visual search

视觉搜索
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是系统地比较和评估专家和非专家体育官员之间在感知-认知技能方面的差异,并进一步探讨不同类型体育官员造成的潜在差异,以便更全面地了解体育官员的感知认知能力。
    在四个英文数据库中搜索了2022年12月31日之前发布的相关文献。使用ReviewManager5.4和Stata12.0软件进行荟萃分析和偏倚检验。
    专家体育官员的决策要比非专家体育官员准确得多,并表现出较大的效应量大小(SMD=1.09;95CI:0.52,1.66;P<0.05)。专家体育官员的注视次数明显少于非专家体育官员,并且效果大小适中(SMD=0.71;95CI:1.25,0.17;P<0.05)。专家体育官员的固定时间(SMD=0.23;95CI:0.25,0.71;P=0.35)与非专家体育官员没有显着差异。
    可以看出,专家和非专家体育官员的感知-认知技能存在差异。决策准确性可以作为区分专家和非专家体育官员的感知认知技能的重要指标。注视次数可以作为区分监护仪感知认知技能的重要指标。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?RecordID=418594,标识符:CRD42023418594。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to systematically compare and assess the differences in perceptual-cognitive skills between expert and non-expert sports officials, and further explore the potential differences caused by different types of sports officials, in order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the perceptual-cognitive skills of sports officials.
    UNASSIGNED: Relevant literature published before 31 December 2022 was searched in four English databases. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software were used for meta-analysis and bias test.
    UNASSIGNED: Expert sports officials are significantly more accurate in their decision-making than non-expert sports officials, and exhibit a large amount of effect size (SMD = 1.09; 95%CI: 0.52, 1.66; P < 0.05). Expert sports officials had significantly fewer number of fixations than non-expert sports officials and showed a moderate amount of effect size (SMD = 0.71; 95%CI: 1.25, 0.17; P < 0.05). Expert sports officials\' duration of fixation (SMD = 0.23; 95%CI: 0.25, 0.71; P = 0.35) were not significantly different from non-expert sports officials.
    UNASSIGNED: It can be seen that there are differences in the Perceptual-cognitive skills of expert and non-expert sports officials. Decision-making accuracy can serve as an important indicator for distinguishing the perceptual-cognitive skills of expert and non-expert sports officials. Number of fixations can serve as important indicators to differentiate the perceptual-cognitive skills of monitors.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=418594, identifier: CRD42023418594.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视觉搜索(VS)包括一类任务,我们通常在一天中执行几次,并且需要在干扰因素刺激中有意扫描(有或没有移动眼睛)特定目标(无论是对象还是特征)的环境。在基于实验室或现实世界的环境中进行的实验研究从一个名义的角度提供了对其潜在神经认知机制的见解。鲜为人知但快速增长的准实验和相关研究机构探索了个体差异与VS表现之间的联系。这结合了不同的研究传统,涵盖了部署大量VS任务的研究中广泛的个体差异。因此,在考虑更广泛的文献时,确定单项研究中强调的任何关联是否稳健是一个挑战.然而,系统和全面地阐明这种关系将有助于建立更准确的VS模型,它将突出未来研究的有希望的方向。本系统综述提供了对现有文献的最新和全面综合,这些文献调查了VS任务中常见的性能指标与映射到四类认知能力(短期工作记忆,流体推理,视觉处理和处理速度)和七类性状(五大性状,特质焦虑和自闭症特征)。这两个特征的一致关联(特别是,尽责,自闭症特征和特质焦虑-后者仅限于情绪刺激)和认知能力(尤其是视觉处理)被确定。总的来说,然而,未来研究的信息将受益于检查和报告所有测量工具的可靠性,应用多重性校正,使用互补技术,研究预注册和测试为什么,而不仅仅是如果,某些个体差异与VS表现之间存在稳健的关系。
    Visual search (VS) comprises a class of tasks that we typically perform several times during a day and requires intentionally scanning (with or without moving the eyes) the environment for a specific target (be it an object or a feature) among distractor stimuli. Experimental research in lab-based or real-world settings has offered insight into its underlying neurocognitive mechanisms from a nomothetic point of view. A lesser-known but rapidly growing body of quasi-experimental and correlational research has explored the link between individual differences and VS performance. This combines different research traditions and covers a wide range of individual differences in studies deploying a vast array of VS tasks. As such, it is a challenge to determine whether any associations highlighted in single studies are robust when considering the wider literature. However, clarifying such relationships systematically and comprehensively would help build more accurate models of VS, and it would highlight promising directions for future research. This systematic review provides an up to date and comprehensive synthesis of the existing literature investigating associations between common indices of performance in VS tasks and measures of individual differences mapped onto four categories of cognitive abilities (short-term working memory, fluid reasoning, visual processing and processing speed) and seven categories of traits (Big Five traits, trait anxiety and autistic traits). Consistent associations for both traits (in particular, conscientiousness, autistic traits and trait anxiety - the latter limited to emotional stimuli) and cognitive abilities (particularly visual processing) were identified. Overall, however, informativeness of future studies would benefit from checking and reporting the reliability of all measurement tools, applying multiplicity correction, using complementary techniques, study preregistration and testing why, rather than only if, a robust relation between certain individual differences and VS performance exists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    视觉搜索,试图在干扰者中找到目标的过程,是一项备受研究的认知任务。较少研究的是在找到目标之前中断搜索任务的条件。视觉搜索中这种中断的后果已经在各个学科中进行了调查,这导致了不同的,有时是矛盾的发现。本系统综述的目的是对视觉搜索中断的影响提供更有凝聚力的理解。为此,我们确定了28项符合纳入标准的研究.为了便于更有组织和全面的分析,我们根据三个维度对研究进行分组:搜索环境,中断的后果,以及中断事件的类型。虽然视觉搜索中的中断是可变的,并且在研究中表现不同,我们的审查提供了一个更有凝聚力的理解这个主题的基础方案。这种分类是探索潜在未来方向的起点,我们在结论中描述了这一点。
    Visual search, the process of trying to find a target presented among distractors, is a much-studied cognitive task. Less well-studied is the condition in which the search task is interrupted before the target is found. The consequences of such interruptions in visual search have been investigated across various disciplines, which has resulted in diverse and at times contradictory findings. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a more cohesive understanding of the effects of interruptions in visual search. For this purpose, we identified 28 studies that met our inclusion criteria. To facilitate a more organized and comprehensive analysis, we grouped the studies based on three dimensions: the search environment, the interruption aftermath, and the type of the interrupting event. While interruptions in visual search are variable and manifest differently across studies, our review provides a foundational scheme for a more cohesive understanding of the subject. This categorization serves as a starting point for exploring potential future directions, which we delineate in our conclusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    为了系统地评估专家和非专家对不同类型格斗运动的知觉预期,我们需要进行全面评估。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们搜索了四个英语和三个中文数据库,它们使用专家/非专家研究范式,探索格斗运动中的感性期待。我们采用了随机效应模型,使用逆方差方法进行汇总分析。在这项荟萃分析中,我们纳入了27项符合条件的研究,涉及233个数据集。我们观察到专家和非专家之间在反应准确性(1.51;95%CI:1.15至1.87,p<0.05)和反应时间(-0.91;95%CI:-1.08至-0.73,p<0.05)方面的差异很大。我们还观察到专家和非专家在每次试验的平均视觉固定持续时间上存在实质性差异(1.51;95%CI:-2.40至-0.63,p<0.05),但不在视觉固定持续时间内(0.16;-061至0.92,p=0.69)。一起来看,高水平的格斗运动员比低水平的运动员在感性预期上更有优势,在面对对手的攻击时表现出更快,更准确的反应,以及专注于比新手运动员更少的视觉关注点。不同类型的战斗运动和刺激表现会在不同程度上影响与结果指标有关的知觉预期能力,在更接近现实世界情况的刺激方面拥有更明显的专业知识。
    UNASSIGNED:https://www。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021226343,PROSPEROCRD42021226343。
    In order to systematically evaluate perceptual anticipation between experts and non-experts for different kinds of combat sports, we needed to perform a comprehensive assessment. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four English-language and three Chinese-language databases that used expert/non-expert research paradigms, to explore perceptual anticipation in combat sports. We employed a random effects model for pooled analyses using the inverse variance method. We included 27 eligible studies involving 233 datasets in this meta-analysis. We observed large effect sizes for the differences between experts and non-experts in both response accuracy (1.51; 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.87, p < 0.05) and reaction time (-0.91; 95% CI: -1.08 to-0.73, p < 0.05). We also observed substantial differences between experts and non-experts in the mean duration of visual fixations per trial (1.51; 95% CI: -2.40 to -0.63, p < 0.05), but not in the visual fixation duration (0.16; -061 to 0.92, p = 0.69). Taken together, high-level combat athletes have more advantages in perceptual anticipation than lower-level athletes, showing faster and more accurate responses when facing the opponent\'s attacks, as well as focusing on fewer points of visual fixations than novice athletes. Different types of combat sports and stimulus presentations affect perceptual anticipation abilities to varying extents in relation to outcome measures, with more pronounced expertise in a stimulus that is closer to real-world situations.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021226343, PROSPERO CRD42021226343.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    未经批准:迄今为止,单方面空间忽视(USN)的评估没有黄金标准,一种常见的卒中后认知障碍,目前使用的临床评估提供的敏感性有限。广泛的研究表明,基于计算机(CB)的评估可以更敏感,但是这些还没有被中风服务机构采用。
    UNASSIGNED:我们进行了系统回顾,概述了USN的现有CB测试,以确定知识差距和不同方法的积极/消极方面。这篇综述还调查了将CB评估任务引入临床环境的好处和障碍,并探讨了优化未来设计的实际意义。
    UNASSIGNED:我们纳入的研究调查了与常规方法相比,CB忽视评估任务在检测脑损伤成人USN方面的功效。通过电子数据库搜索进行研究识别(例如,Scopus),使用关键词和标准化术语组合,没有日期限制(最后搜索:08/06/2022)。文献综述和研究选择基于预先指定的纳入标准。使用诊断准确性研究工具(Quadas-2)的质量评估来评估研究质量。数据合成包括叙事合成,一张总结证据的表格,并根据影响方向图进行计票分析。
    UNASSIGNED:共有28项研究符合资格标准并被纳入审查。根据我们的结果,13/28研究探索了常规任务的CB版本,11/28涉及视觉搜索任务,和5/28其他类型的任务。投票计数分析显示,17/28研究发现CB任务的灵敏度与常规方法相同或更高,并且与常规方法呈正相关(15/28研究)。最后,20/28研究显示,CB任务有效地检测了不同患者组和对照组中的USN患者(17/28)。
    UNASSIGNED:本次审查的结果为今后实施CB评估提供了实际影响,提供重要信息以增强各种方法论问题。这项研究增加了我们对使用CB任务进行USN评估的理解,探索它们与传统方法相比的功效和益处,并考虑在临床环境中采用它们。
    UNASSIGNED: To date, no gold standard exists for the assessment of unilateral spatial neglect (USN), a common post-stroke cognitive impairment, with limited sensitivity provided by currently used clinical assessments. Extensive research has shown that computer-based (CB) assessment can be more sensitive, but these have not been adopted by stroke services yet.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review providing an overview of existing CB tests for USN to identify knowledge gaps and positive/negative aspects of different methods. This review also investigated the benefits and barriers of introducing CB assessment tasks to clinical settings and explored practical implications for optimizing future designs.
    UNASSIGNED: We included studies that investigated the efficacy of CB neglect assessment tasks compared to conventional methods in detecting USN for adults with brain damage. Study identification was conducted through electronic database searches (e.g., Scopus), using keywords and standardized terms combinations, without date limitation (last search: 08/06/2022). Literature review and study selection were based on prespecified inclusion criteria. The quality of studies was assessed with the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool (Quadas-2). Data synthesis included a narrative synthesis, a table summarizing the evidence, and vote counting analysis based on a direction of effect plot.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 28 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. According to our results, 13/28 studies explored CB versions of conventional tasks, 11/28 involved visual search tasks, and 5/28 other types of tasks. The vote counting analysis revealed that 17/28 studies found CB tasks had either equal or higher sensitivity than conventional methods and positive correlation with conventional methods (15/28 studies). Finally, 20/28 studies showed CB tasks effectively detected patients with USN within different patient groups and control groups (17/28).
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of this review provide practical implications for the implementation of CB assessment in the future, offering important information to enhance a variety of methodological issues. The study adds to our understanding of using CB tasks for USN assessment, exploring their efficacy and benefits compared to conventional methods, and considers their adoption in clinical environments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视觉选择性注意是指在场景中选择相关的视觉元素而忽略不相关的视觉元素。视觉选择性注意功能障碍(VSAD)在脑视力损害(CVI)儿童中普遍存在,注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和阅读障碍。儿科神经心理学实践中的一个重要问题是如何区分这些人群的任务表现。我们对CVI儿童的视觉搜索表现(VSP)的文献进行了范围审查,多动症,和阅读障碍,6-12岁。经过系统的选择过程,共纳入35项研究。结果表明,与通常发育中的儿童相比,所有患者组都有一定程度的VSP受损。患有CVI的儿童往往反应较慢且不准确。患有ADHD的儿童的VSP损伤的特点是准确性差,而不是反应时间。患有阅读障碍的儿童往往速度较慢,准确性较低,取决于刺激类型。除了VSAD,有人认为其他神经认知机制可能会影响VSP,例如速度-准确性权衡或多动症的执行功能缺陷和阅读障碍的语音缺陷。本文进一步研讨了群体间视觉搜刮成绩的异同。官方诊断为CVI的儿童的稀疏数据以及关于ADHD和阅读障碍儿童的技术不确定性数据表明,在临床实践中基于VSP区分这些人群的复杂性。新的和更定量的VSP参数,例如基于眼睛跟踪的措施,可能有助于CVI之间的精细分类,多动症,和阅读障碍。
    Visual selective attention refers to the selection of relevant visual elements in a scene whilst ignoring irrelevant visual elements. Visual Selective Attention Dysfunctions (VSAD) are prevalent in children with Cerebral Visual Impairment (CVI), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and Dyslexia. An important issue in the pediatric neuropsychological practice is how to discriminate between the task performance of these populations. We conducted a scoping review of the literature on visual search performance (VSP) in children with CVI, ADHD, and Dyslexia, aged 6-12 years. After a systematic selection process, 35 studies were included. Results suggest that all patient groups have some degree of impaired VSP compared to typically developing children. Children with CVI tend to react slower and less accurately. VSP impairments in children with ADHD are characterized by poor accuracy rather than reaction time. Children with Dyslexia tend to be slower and less accurate, depending on stimulus type. Besides VSAD, it is argued that other neurocognitive mechanisms might influence VSP, such as speed-accuracy trade-off or an executive functioning deficit in ADHD and a phonological deficit in Dyslexia. This paper further discusses the differences and similarities in visual search performance between the groups. The sparse data in children with an official diagnosis of CVI and the technical inconclusive data on children with ADHD and Dyslexia demonstrate complexity of discriminating between these populations in clinical practice based on VSP. New and more quantitative VSP parameters, such as eye tracking-based measures, may contribute to a refined classification among CVI, ADHD, and Dyslexia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    In studies on probabilistic cuing of visual search, participants search for a target among several distractors and report some feature of the target. In a biased stage the target appears more frequently in one specific area of the search display. Eventually, participants become faster at finding the target in that rich region compared to the sparse region. In some experiments, this stage is followed by an unbiased stage, where the target is evenly located across all regions of the display. Despite this change in the spatial distribution of targets, search speed usually remains faster when the target is located in the previously rich region. The persistence of the bias even when it is no longer advantageous has been taken as evidence that this phenomenon is an attentional habit. The aim of this meta-analysis was to test whether the magnitude of probabilistic cuing decreases from the biased to the unbiased stage. A meta-analysis of 42 studies confirmed that probabilistic cuing during the unbiased stage was roughly half the size of cuing during the biased stage, and this decrease persisted even after correcting for publication bias. Thus, the evidence supporting the claim that probabilistic cuing is an attentional habit might not be as compelling as previously thought.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    50多年来,在放射学领域已经研究了搜索效果的满意度。定义为当在图像中找到初始目标时,后续目标的检测率降低,已知这些多个目标错误是遗漏错误的基础(例如,如果发现另一个异常,放射科医生更有可能错过一个异常)。最近,他们还被发现是认知科学实验中基于实验室的搜索错误的基础(例如,如果检测到不同的目标“T”,则观察者更有可能错过目标“T”)。这种现象在认知科学中被重命名为随后的搜索遗漏(SSM)效应。在这里,我们回顾了放射学和认知科学中的SSM文献,并讨论:(1)当前的SSM理论(即,满意,感知集,和资源枯竭理论),(2)SSM效应背后的眼动误差,(3)测试了减轻SSM错误的现有努力,(4)计算SSM效应时使用的方法和分析的演变。最后,我们提出了注意模板理论,对SSM错误的一种新的机械解释,这将我们目前对SSM错误的理解和关注模板文献联系在一起。
    For over 50 years, the satisfaction of search effect has been studied within the field of radiology. Defined as a decrease in detection rates for a subsequent target when an initial target is found within the image, these multiple target errors are known to underlie errors of omission (e.g., a radiologist is more likely to miss an abnormality if another abnormality is identified). More recently, they have also been found to underlie lab-based search errors in cognitive science experiments (e.g., an observer is more likely to miss a target \'T\' if a different target \'T\' was detected). This phenomenon was renamed the subsequent search miss (SSM) effect in cognitive science. Here we review the SSM literature in both radiology and cognitive science and discuss: (1) the current SSM theories (i.e., satisfaction, perceptual set, and resource depletion theories), (2) the eye movement errors that underlie the SSM effect, (3) the existing efforts tested to alleviate SSM errors, and (4) the evolution of methodologies and analyses used when calculating the SSM effect. Finally, we present the attentional template theory, a novel mechanistic explanation for SSM errors, which ties together our current understanding of SSM errors and the attentional template literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在视觉搜索过程中检查眼动行为是一种越来越流行的方法,可以深入了解我们在环境中寻找目标时发生的即时处理。在本教程回顾中,我们描述了一系列陷阱和考虑因素,这些陷阱和考虑因素对从事眼动和视觉搜索实验的研究人员来说很重要-无论是经验丰富的还是对该领域的新手。我们引导读者完成视觉搜索和眼动实验的研究周期,选择正确的预测,通过数据收集,方法报告,分析方法,要分析的不同因变量,从结果模式中得出结论。总的来说,我们希望这次审查可以作为指导,一个谈话点,反思当前关于这一主题的文献的实践和潜在问题,最终迈出了标准化该领域研究实践的第一步。
    Examining eye-movement behavior during visual search is an increasingly popular approach for gaining insights into the moment-to-moment processing that takes place when we look for targets in our environment. In this tutorial review, we describe a set of pitfalls and considerations that are important for researchers - both experienced and new to the field - when engaging in eye-movement and visual search experiments. We walk the reader through the research cycle of a visual search and eye-movement experiment, from choosing the right predictions, through to data collection, reporting of methodology, analytic approaches, the different dependent variables to analyze, and drawing conclusions from patterns of results. Overall, our hope is that this review can serve as a guide, a talking point, a reflection on the practices and potential problems with the current literature on this topic, and ultimately a first step towards standardizing research practices in the field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述的目的是研究有关裁判凝视行为的文献。文献检索发现只有12项相关研究。其中五项研究是针对协会足球(足球)的裁判进行的,三个关于体操法官,一个是垒球裁判,手球裁判每人一名,橄榄球,还有冰球.七项研究报告了较高技能水平的裁判和较低技能水平的裁判在凝视行为上的差异,而四项研究没有发现差异。此外,五项研究报告了不同技能水平的裁判在凝视行为和表现方面的差异,而四项研究仅发现性能差异。当前的审查引起了许多方法上的关注。其中包括缺乏在生态有效条件下进行的研究,缺乏对周边视觉的研究,以及缺乏作为团队一起工作的裁判的数据。基于这篇综述,我们得出的结论是,需要更多的研究来澄清凝视行为和裁判表现之间的关系。与裁判一起工作的从业者在采用注视训练策略以提高选择性注意力时应谨慎,因为关于其有效性的数据很少,有时甚至相互矛盾。
    The purpose of this review was to examine the literature on gaze behavior in referees. A literature search found only 12 relevant studies. Five of those studies were conducted on referees in association football (soccer), three on judges in gymnastics, one on softball umpires, and one each on referees in team handball, rugby, and ice hockey. Seven studies reported differences in gaze behavior between referees of a higher skill level and those of a lower skill level, while four studies found no differences. In addition, five studies reported differences between referees of different skill levels in both gaze behavior and performance, while four studies found differences in performance only. A number of methodological concerns arise from the current review. Among them are the lack of studies conducted in ecologically valid conditions, the lack of studies on peripheral vision, and the lack of data on referees who are working together as teams. Based on this review, we conclude that additional research is needed to clarify the relationships between gaze behavior and performance in refereeing. Practitioners who work with referees should be cautious when adopting gaze training strategies to improve selective attention, since the data on their effectiveness are scarce and sometimes contradictory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号