PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study is to systematically compare and assess the differences in perceptual-cognitive skills between expert and non-expert sports officials, and further explore the potential differences caused by different types of sports officials, in order to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the perceptual-cognitive skills of sports officials.
UNASSIGNED: Relevant literature published before 31 December 2022 was searched in four English databases. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software were used for meta-analysis and bias test.
UNASSIGNED: Expert sports officials are significantly more accurate in their decision-making than non-expert sports officials, and exhibit a large amount of effect size (SMD = 1.09; 95%CI: 0.52, 1.66; P < 0.05). Expert sports officials had significantly fewer number of fixations than non-expert sports officials and showed a moderate amount of effect size (SMD = 0.71; 95%CI: 1.25, 0.17; P < 0.05). Expert sports officials\' duration of fixation (SMD = 0.23; 95%CI: 0.25, 0.71; P = 0.35) were not significantly different from non-expert sports officials.
UNASSIGNED: It can be seen that there are differences in the Perceptual-cognitive skills of expert and non-expert sports officials. Decision-making accuracy can serve as an important indicator for distinguishing the perceptual-cognitive skills of expert and non-expert sports officials. Number of fixations can serve as important indicators to differentiate the perceptual-cognitive skills of monitors.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=418594, identifier: CRD42023418594.
UNASSIGNED: Relevant literature published before 31 December 2022 was searched in four English databases. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 12.0 software were used for meta-analysis and bias test.
UNASSIGNED: Expert sports officials are significantly more accurate in their decision-making than non-expert sports officials, and exhibit a large amount of effect size (SMD = 1.09; 95%CI: 0.52, 1.66; P < 0.05). Expert sports officials had significantly fewer number of fixations than non-expert sports officials and showed a moderate amount of effect size (SMD = 0.71; 95%CI: 1.25, 0.17; P < 0.05). Expert sports officials\' duration of fixation (SMD = 0.23; 95%CI: 0.25, 0.71; P = 0.35) were not significantly different from non-expert sports officials.
UNASSIGNED: It can be seen that there are differences in the Perceptual-cognitive skills of expert and non-expert sports officials. Decision-making accuracy can serve as an important indicator for distinguishing the perceptual-cognitive skills of expert and non-expert sports officials. Number of fixations can serve as important indicators to differentiate the perceptual-cognitive skills of monitors.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=418594, identifier: CRD42023418594.
摘要：
■这项研究的目的是系统地比较和评估专家和非专家体育官员之间在感知-认知技能方面的差异，并进一步探讨不同类型体育官员造成的潜在差异，以便更全面地了解体育官员的感知认知能力。
■在四个英文数据库中搜索了2022年12月31日之前发布的相关文献。使用ReviewManager5.4和Stata12.0软件进行荟萃分析和偏倚检验。
■专家体育官员的决策要比非专家体育官员准确得多,并表现出较大的效应量大小(SMD=1.09;95CI:0.52,1.66;P<0.05)。专家体育官员的注视次数明显少于非专家体育官员，并且效果大小适中（SMD=0.71；95CI：1.25，0.17；P<0.05）。专家体育官员的固定时间（SMD=0.23；95CI：0.25，0.71；P=0.35）与非专家体育官员没有显着差异。
■可以看出，专家和非专家体育官员的感知-认知技能存在差异。决策准确性可以作为区分专家和非专家体育官员的感知认知技能的重要指标。注视次数可以作为区分监护仪感知认知技能的重要指标。
■https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?RecordID=418594，标识符：CRD42023418594。
■在四个英文数据库中搜索了2022年12月31日之前发布的相关文献。使用ReviewManager5.4和Stata12.0软件进行荟萃分析和偏倚检验。
■专家体育官员的决策要比非专家体育官员准确得多,并表现出较大的效应量大小(SMD=1.09;95CI:0.52,1.66;P<0.05)。专家体育官员的注视次数明显少于非专家体育官员，并且效果大小适中（SMD=0.71；95CI：1.25，0.17；P<0.05）。专家体育官员的固定时间（SMD=0.23；95CI：0.25，0.71；P=0.35）与非专家体育官员没有显着差异。
■可以看出，专家和非专家体育官员的感知-认知技能存在差异。决策准确性可以作为区分专家和非专家体育官员的感知认知技能的重要指标。注视次数可以作为区分监护仪感知认知技能的重要指标。
■https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/display_record。php?RecordID=418594，标识符：CRD42023418594。
