腭注射被认为是最痛苦的牙科手术之一。因此,重要的是要找到替代这种痛苦的注射,以改善儿童的合作。牙科文献提到使用EMLA乳膏作为常规注射的可能替代品,但它的麻醉效果引起了争论。因此,研究微针贴片对增强这种乳膏功效的影响是有价值的。这项随机对照临床试验的目的是比较7-11岁儿童不同麻醉方法的有效性和疼痛程度。这项研究比较了EMLA霜的使用,EMLA用微针,和常规腭注射.将90名儿童随机分为三组:第1组接受常规腭部麻醉(对照组),第2组仅接受EMLA霜,第3组接受带微针的EMLA。在三个不同的时间点使用FLACC和Wong-Baker量表评估疼痛水平:T1(麻醉期间),T2(腭探查),和T3(在提取期间)。FLACC量表显示仅在T1时两组之间的疼痛差异显着(P值=0.000)。发现常规pal注射组的疼痛程度高于仅使用EMLA乳膏和使用带有EMLA乳膏的微针贴片组(P值=0.000)。然而,其他组麻醉期间疼痛水平无显著差异(P值=1.00).同样,Wong-Baker量表还显示仅在T1时两组之间的疼痛差异有统计学意义(P值=0.000).发现常规pal注射组的疼痛程度高于仅使用EMLA乳膏和使用带有EMLA乳膏的微针贴片组(P值=0.000)。然而,其他组麻醉期间的疼痛水平无显著差异(P值=0.091).该研究得出的结论是,单独的EMLA乳膏和带有微针的EMLA都可以用作儿童常规腭麻醉的替代品。
Palatal injections are considered to be one of the most painful dental procedures. As a result, it was important to find alternatives to this painful injection to improve children\'s cooperation. The dental literature mentioned using EMLA cream as a possible alternative to conventional injections, but its anesthetic effect was debated. Therefore, it was valuable to research the impact of
microneedle patches to enhance the effectiveness of this cream. The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of different methods of anesthesia and pain levels in children aged 7-11 years. The study compared the use of EMLA cream, EMLA with microneedles, and conventional palatal injections. A total of 90 children were randomly assigned to three groups: Group 1 received conventional palatal anesthesia (control), Group 2 received EMLA cream only, and Group 3 received EMLA with microneedles. Pain levels were assessed using the FLACC and Wong-Baker scales at three different time points: T1(during anesthesia), T2(on palatal probing), and T3(during extraction). The FLACC scale revealed a significant difference in pain between groups only at T1 (P value = 0.000). It was found that the conventional palatal injection group had a higher pain level than the EMLA cream-only group and the group using
microneedle patches with EMLA cream (P value = 0.000). However, the other groups did not show significant differences in pain levels during the anesthesia (P value = 1.00). Similarly, the Wong-Baker scale also demonstrated a statistically significant difference in pain between groups only at T1 (P value = 0.000). It was found that the conventional palatal injection group had a higher pain level than the EMLA cream-only group and the group using
microneedle patches with EMLA cream (P value = 0.000). However, the other groups did not show significant differences in pain levels during the anesthesia (P value = 0.091). The study concludes that both EMLA cream alone and EMLA with microneedles can be used as an alternative to conventional palatal anesthesia for children.