Factor analysis

因子分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和精神分裂症(SZ)共有特征,特别是在社交技能和阴性症状方面,和较小程度的阳性症状。鉴别诊断可能是具有挑战性的,辨别表达性和经验性阴性症状可能提供具有潜在诊断和功能相关性的知识,可以指导治疗。使用阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)进行了两个探索性因素分析(EFA)以揭示阴性和阳性症状的潜在维度。阳性症状和阴性症状评估量表(SAPS/SANS)和自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS-G)。阴性症状EFA出现了三个因素(70.5%方差):NF1)表达阴性;NF2)经验阴性;和NF3)专注,吸收和表达情感扁平化。出现了三个积极因素(差异68.6%):PF1)幻觉-妄想;PF2)宏伟;和PF3)思想障碍-ADOS阳性症状。SZ表现出更高的PF1成绩,ASD的PF3评分较高。在负面因素方面没有观察到组间差异。跨群体,所有负面因素均与生活质量呈负相关.只有NF1和NF2和PF1与社会功能相关。使用所有因素的判别函数分析正确分类了84.4%的参与者,PF1,NF1其次是NF2是最好的诊断预测因子。表达阴性,然后是经验阴性症状具有诊断价值,与SZ相关的阳性症状无关,并且与有害功能有关。研究结果证实有必要明确针对阴性症状,和特定的SZ相关和ASD相关的阳性症状,特别是使用几种评估工具进行诊断分类。
    Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and schizophrenia (SZ) share traits, especially in social skills and negative symptoms, and to a lesser degree positive symptoms. Differential diagnosis can be challenging and discerning expressive and experiential negative symptoms may provide knowledge with potential diagnostic and functional relevance that can guide treatment. Two exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted to reveal the underlying dimensions of negative and positive symptoms using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms & Negative Symptoms (SAPS/SANS) and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic (ADOS-G). Three factors emerged from the negative symptom EFA (70.5 % variance): NF1) Expressive Negative; NF2) Experiential Negative; and NF3) Preoccupation, Absorption & Expressive Affective Flattening. Three positive factors emerged (68.6 % variance): PF1) Hallucinations-Delusions; PF2) Grandiosity; and PF3) Thought Disorder-ADOS positive Symptoms. SZ showed higher PF1 scores, and ASD had higher PF3 scores. No differences between groups were observed in the negative factors. Across groups, all negative factors were inversely associated with quality of life. Only NF1 and NF2 and PF1 were detrimentally related to social functioning. A discriminant function analysis using all factors classified correctly 84.4 % of participants, with PF1, NF1 followed by NF2 being the best predictors of diagnosis. Expressive negative followed by Experiential negative symptoms are of diagnostic value independent of and beyond SZ-related positive symptoms and are related with detrimental functioning. Findings confirm the need to distinctively target negative symptoms, and specific SZ-related and ASD-related positive symptoms, and especially the use of several assessment tools for diagnostic classification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:牙科学校的主要责任是设计课程,以增强学生对正畸病例分析的信心和知识。本研究旨在比较本科生在正畸病例筛查中的信心水平和表现,由教师以讲座为基础的形式主持,反对他们一年后对相同案例的自我分析,使用基于案例的翻转学习方法。
    方法:这项研究涉及100名五年级学生。同一组通过以讲师为中心的方式接受了博士前正畸训练,第五年的说教方法和基于案例的方法,以学生为中心,在他们的第六年翻转课堂方法。在每个学期结束时,学生完成了正畸病例分析和自我反思调查。
    结果:这项研究发现,两种研究方法对正畸发现的诊断能力没有显着差异。然而,自我评估调查数据显示,学生的信心水平有所提高。这特别是在进行独立的正畸病例诊断方面,与正畸专家有效沟通,以及他们在翻转教室方法后接近正畸病例时的舒适度。尽管对病例诊断的信心增加,结果显示,最后一年的学生不确定制定初步治疗计划和在早期转诊病例。
    结论:尽管在另一学期以学生为中心的学习后,学生的正畸诊断能力没有改善,他们诊断正畸病例的信心明显增强。
    BACKGROUND: Dental schools have a primary responsibility to devise a curriculum that enhances students\' confidence and knowledge in orthodontic case analysis. This study aims to compare the confidence levels and performance of undergraduate students in orthodontic case screening, moderated by faculty in a lecture-based format against their self-analysis of the same cases 1 year later, using a case-based and flipped learning approach.
    METHODS: This study involved 100 fifth-year students. The same group received predoctoral orthodontics training through an instructor-centered, didactic approach in their fifth year and a case-based, student-centered, flipped classroom approach in their sixth year. At the end of each semester, the students completed an orthodontic case analysis and a self-reflection survey.
    RESULTS: This study found no significant differences in diagnostic capabilities for orthodontic findings between the two methods studied. However, the self-evaluation survey data revealed an increase in students\' confidence levels. This was specifically in terms of carrying out independent orthodontic case diagnosis, effectively communicating with orthodontic specialists, and their comfort in approaching orthodontic cases following the flipped classroom approach. Despite increased confidence in case diagnosis, the results showed that final-year students are uncertain about creating initial treatment plans and referring cases at an early stage.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite no observed improvement in students\' orthodontic diagnostic abilities after another semester of student-centered learning, their confidence in diagnosing orthodontic cases was notably enhanced.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    An efficient, multidimensional instrument is needed to screen non-optimal prenatal parental representations predictive of postnatal parenting behavior and child attachment. The present work aimed to revise and validate the Prenatal Caregiving Expectations Questionnaire-Revised (PCEQ-R). Survey data from two independent samples of pregnant, primarily Danish, women (N = 300/322) were collected to 1) test the factor structure and select items for a 20-item version, and 2) confirm the factor structure, examine internal consistency, and establish initial construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a three-factor model of helpless-dysregulated, anxious-hyperactivated, and avoidant-deactivated caregiving representations. Internal consistency was acceptable (α > .73). Construct validity analyses showed that higher helpless-dysregulated caregiving was associated with low maternal antenatal attachment quality (rs = -.36) and intensity (rs = -.11), increased risk of perinatal depression (rs = .37), and trait anxiety (rs = .37). Higher anxious-hyperactivated caregiving was associated with better maternal antenatal attachment quality (rs = .20) and higher intensity (rs = .26), while avoidant-deactivated caregiving was not associated with maternal antenatal attachment. These findings support the validity and multidimensional structure of the measure. The homogenous nature of the sample limits generalizability of results. Future studies should examine predictive validity of the PCEQ-R and include clinical samples.
    Se necesita un instrumento eficiente y multidimensional para examinar las representaciones prenatales no óptimas de los progenitores que predicen la conducta de crianza y la afectividad del niño. El presente trabajo se propuso revisar y validar el Cuestionario de Expectativas Prenatales de Prestación de Cuidado—Revisado (PCEQ‐R). Se recogió información de encuesta de dos grupos muestra independientes de mujeres embarazadas, primariamente danesas, para 1) probar la estructura de factores y seleccionar los puntos para una versión de 20 asuntos, y 2) confirmar la estructura de factores examinar la consistencia interna, así como establecer la validez del modelo inicial. Los análisis de factores confirmatorios apoyaron un modelo de tres factores de representaciones de prestación de cuidado: indefensas‐desreguladas, ansiosas‐hiperactivas y evasivas‐desactivadas. La consistencia interna fue aceptable (α > .73). Los análisis de validez del modelo mostraron que una prestación de cuidado indefensa‐desregulada más alta se asociaba con la baja calidad de la afectividad materna antenatal (rs = ‐.36) y su intensidad (rs = ‐.11), el aumento en el riesgo de depresión perinatal (rs = .37) y en el rasgo de ansiedad (rs = .37). Una más alta prestación de cuidado de tipo ansiosa‐hiperactiva se asoció con una mejor calidad de la afectividad materna antenatal (rs = .20) y mayor intensidad (rs = .26), mientras que la prestación de cuidado evasiva‐desactivada no se asoció con la afectividad materna antenatal. Estos resultados apoyan la validez y estructura multidimensional de la medida. La naturaleza homogénea del grupo muestra limita la posibilidad de generalización de los resultados. Estudios futuros deben examinar la validez de predicción de PCEQ‐R e incluir grupos muestra clínicos.
    Prenatal Caregiving Expectations Questionnaire—Revised Version: Faktorenstruktur, interne Konsistenz und erste Konstruktvalidität Es wird ein effizientes, multidimensionales Screeninginstrument benötigt, um nicht‐optimale pränatale elterliche Repräsentationen zu erfassen, welche das postnatale Erziehungsverhalten sowie den Bindungsstil des Kindes vorhersagen. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war die Revision und Validierung des Prenatal Caregiving Expectations Questionnaire—Revised (PCEQ‐R). Es wurden Umfragedaten von zwei unabhängigen Stichproben schwangerer, hauptsächlich dänischer, Frauen (N = 300/322) erhoben, um 1) die Faktorenstruktur zu testen und Items für eine 20‐Item‐Version auszuwählen sowie 2) die Faktorenstruktur zu bestätigen, die interne Konsistenz zu untersuchen und eine erste Konstruktvalidität herzustellen. Die konfirmatorische Faktorenanalyse stützte ein dreifaktorielles Modell mit hilflos‐dysregulierten, ängstlich‐hyperaktivierten und vermeidend‐deaktivierten pränatalen elterlichen Fürsorgerepräsentationen. Die interne Konsistenz war akzeptabel (α > .73). Analysen der Konstruktvalidität zeigten, dass höhere hilflos‐dysregulierte Fürsorge mit niedrigerer mütterlicher pränataler Bindungsqualität (rs = ‐.36) und ‐intensität (rs = ‐.11), einem erhöhten Risiko für perinatale Depression (rs = .37) sowie mit erhöhter Trait‐Angst (rs = .37) verbunden war. Ein höheres Maß an ängstlich‐hyperaktivem Fürsorgeverhalten war mit einer besseren Qualität (rs = .20) und Intensität (rs = .26) der mütterlichen pränatalen Bindung verbunden, während vermeidend‐deaktiviertes Fürsorgeverhalten nicht mit der mütterlichen pränatalen Bindung assoziiert war. Diese Ergebnisse unterstützen die Validität und die multidimensionale Struktur des Instruments. Die Homogenität der Stichprobe schränkt die Generalisierbarkeit der Ergebnisse ein. Künftige Studien sollten die prädiktive Validität des PCEQ‐R untersuchen sowie klinische Stichproben einbeziehen.
    出生前介護期待質問票‐改訂版‐.因子構造、内部一致性、および初期構成概念妥当性 出産後の育児行動と子どもの愛着を予測する、適切ではない出生前の親の表象をスクリーニングするためには、効率的で多次元的な尺度が必要である。本研究は、出生前育児期待質問票 (Prenatal Caregiving Expectations Questionnaire—Revised:PCEQ‐R) の改訂と妥当性の検証を目的としている。 主にデンマーク人の妊娠女性 (N = 300/322) の2つの独立した標本から調査データを収集し、1) 因子構造を検証し、20項目版の項目を選択し、2) 因子構造を確認し、内的一貫性を検討し、初期の構成概念妥当性を確立した。確認的因子分析により、無力‐調節不全、不安‐過活動、回避‐不活動の育児表象の3因子モデルが支持された。内的一貫性は許容範囲であった (α>.73) 。構成概念妥当性分析によると、より高い無力‐調節不全型養育は、低い母親の妊産婦期の愛着の質 (rs = ‐.36) および強度 (rs = ‐.11) 、周産期うつ病のリスク増加 (rs = 0.37) 、および特性不安 (rs = 0.37) と関連していた。より高い不安‐過活動型養育は、より良好な妊産婦の愛着の質 (rs = 0.20) およびより高い強度 (rs = 0.26) と関連していたが、回避‐非活動型養育は妊産婦の愛着とは関連していなかった。.
    我们需要一种高效的多维工具来筛查非最佳的产前父母表现, 这些表现可以预测产后育儿行为和儿童依恋。本研究旨在修订和验证《产前护理期望问卷‐修订版》(PCEQ‐R)。 我们收集了两个独立孕妇样本 (主要是丹麦孕妇) 的调查数据 (N = 300/322), 用于1) 测试因子结构并为“20项版本”选择项目, 以及 2) 确认因子结构, 检查内部一致性, 并建立初步的结构效度。 验证性因子分析支持一个三因子模型, 即无助‐失调、焦虑‐过激和回避‐失活护理表现。内部一致性是可接受的 (α > .73) 。结构效度分析表明, 无助‐失调型护理表现水平越高, 母亲的产前依恋质量 (rs = ‐.36) 和强度 (rs = ‐.11) 越低、围产期抑郁 (rs = .37) 和特质焦虑 (rs = .37) 风险也越高。焦虑‐过激型护理表现水平越高, 母亲的产前依恋质量 (rs = .20) 和强度 (rs = .26) 越高, 而回避‐失活型护理表现与母亲产前依恋无关。.
    هناك حاجة إلى أداة فعالة ومتعددة الأبعاد لفحص تمثيلات الرعاية الوالدية غير المثلى قبل الولادة والتي تنبئ بسلوك الأبوة والأمومة بعد الولادة والتعلق بالطفل. يهدف هذا العمل إلى مراجعة استبيان توقعات الرعاية قبل الولادة والتحقق من صحته (R‐PCEQ). تم جمع بيانات المسح من عينتين مستقلتين من النساء الحوامل الدنماركيات (العدد = 300/322) من أجل 1) اختبار بنية العوامل واختيار بنود لنسخة مكونة من 20 بندًا، و2) تأكيد هيكل العوامل، وفحص الاتساق الداخلي، وإثبات صحة البناء الأولي. دعم تحليل العامل التأكيدي نموذجاً ثلاثي العوامل من تمثيلات تقديم الرعاية المتمثل في التالي: العجز—عدم التنظيم ، والقلق‐ فرط النشاط ، والتجنب—عدم النشاط. كان الاتساق الداخلي مقبولاً (α > .73). وأظهرت تحليلات صلاحية البناء أن تمثيلات تقديم الرعاية الأعلى في نمط العاجز الغير منتظم ارتبطت بانخفاض جودة التعلق قبل الولادة لدى الأمهات (rs = ‐.36) وشدته (rs = ‐.11)، وزيادة خطر الإصابة بالاكتئاب في الفترة المحيطة بالولادة (rs = .37)،,وقلق السمات الشخصية (rs = .37). وارتبط تقديم الرعاية الأكثر قلقاَ مفرط النشاط بجودة تعلق الأمهات قبل الولادة (rs = .20) وشدة التعلق (rs = .26)، بينما لم يرتبط تقديم الرعاية التجنبي غير النشط بتعلق الأمهات قبل الولادة. تدعم هذه النتائج صحة المقياس وبنيته متعددة الأبعاد. تحد الطبيعة المتجانسة للعينة من قابلية تعميم النتائج. يجب أن تفحص الدراسات المستقبلية الصلاحية التنبؤية لمقياس R‐PCEQ وأن تشمل عينات سريرية.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对食物的奖励反应被认为在高度可口的食物过度消费中起着重要作用。在动物模型中,食物奖励响应可以解耦为独特的“喜欢”(在当下享受)和“想要”(动机/渴望)组件。然而,关于喜欢和想要的研究受到了关于喜欢和想要是否可以在人类中可靠分离的不确定性的阻碍。我们使用因子分析来测试是否可以在连续49天评估的女性中经验上区分喜欢和想要的等级。密歇根州立大学双胞胎登记处的女性参与者(N=688;年龄15-30岁)报告说,他们喜欢和想要当天食用的食物,想要当天没有食用的食物,分别用于甜食(例如,cookies),快餐(例如,薯条),碳水化合物(例如,面包),和整个食物(水果,普通鸡肉)连续49天每天晚上。我们检查了49天期间的平均水平和每日喜欢/想要的水平,这些水平捕捉到了随着时间的推移喜欢/想要的个体差异。在这两种类型的分析中,喜欢和想要吃的食物形成了一个单一的因素,而不是单独的,可分离的因素,而想要不吃的食物形成了一个独立的因素。在日常水平上,每个食物类别都出现了一个喜欢/想要的因素(例如,喜欢/想要甜食),而在平均分析中,出现了一个在所有食物类型中崩溃的单一因素(即,喜欢/想要所有食物)。结果表明,个体很难区分他们当天吃过的食物的喜好和渴望,但可能能够更可靠地区分他们没有食用的食物。
    Reward responses to food are thought to play an important role in highly palatable food overconsumption. In animal models, food reward responses can be decoupled into unique \"liking\" (in the moment enjoyment) and \"wanting\" (motivation/craving) components. However, research on liking and wanting has been hampered by uncertainty regarding whether liking and wanting can be reliably separated in humans. We used factor analysis to test whether ratings of liking and wanting could be empirically separated in women assessed across 49 consecutive days. Female participants (N = 688; ages 15-30) from the Michigan State University Twin Registry reported liking and wanting of foods consumed that day, and wanting of foods not consumed that day, separately for sweets (e.g., cookies), fast food (e.g., French fries), carbohydrates (e.g., bread), and whole foods (fruit, plain chicken) each evening for 49 consecutive days. We examined both average levels and daily levels of liking/wanting across the 49-day period that captured individual differences in liking/wanting over time. Across both types of analyses, liking and wanting for foods that were eaten formed a single factor rather than separate, dissociable factors, while wanting of foods not eaten formed an independent factor. At the daily level, a liking/wanting factor emerged for each individual food category (e.g., liking/wanting sweets), whereas in average analyses, a single factor emerged that collapsed across all food types (i.e., liking/wanting of all foods). Results suggest individuals have difficulty distinguishing between liking and wanting of foods they have eaten on that day but may be able to more reliably separate wanting of foods they have not consumed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心理社会因素影响个体对体力活动的渴望。设计了一种新开发的仪器(避免身体活动和运动的趋势;TAPAS)来评估避免身体活动。考虑到文化差异可能是决定性因素,本研究旨在为台湾青年翻译和验证TAPAS为中文(普通话),预计将进行进一步的文化比较。
    方法:标准翻译程序(即,正向翻译,回译,andreconciliation)wasusedtotranslatetheEnglishTAPASintotheChineseTAPAS.翻译之后,608名青年(平均[SD]年龄29.10[6.36]岁;333[54.8%]女性)通过滚雪球抽样方法和在线调查参与了这项研究。所有参与者都完成了中国TAPAS和其他评估体重污名和心理困扰的工具。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于检查中国TAPAS和多组CFA的因子结构,以检查性别之间的测量不变性(男性与女性)和体重状况(超重与不超重)。Pearson相关性用于检查并发有效性;性别组和体重状态组之间的独立t检验用于检查已知组有效性。
    结果:与英文版一致,CFA结果证明了中国TAPAS具有单因素结构。多组CFA结果证明了性别和体重状态组的结构不变。并发有效性得到与相关结构的显着关联的支持(r=0.326至0.676;p<0.001)。性别和体重状态组之间TAPAS总分的显着差异支持了已知组的有效性(p=0.004和<0.001;Cohen\sd=0.24和0.48)。
    结论:中文版的TAPAS是一个有效和可靠的工具,用于评估台湾青少年由于潜在的社会心理问题而避免体力活动和运动。预计将在大量亚洲人口中应用,以及跨文化比较,为了进一步探索健康,行为和流行病学研究与实践。
    OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial factors affect individuals\' desire for physical activity. A newly developed instrument (Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport; TAPAS) has been designed to assess the avoidance of physical activity. Considering cultural differences could be decisive factors, the present study aimed to translate and validate the TAPAS into Chinese (Mandarin) for Taiwanese youths, and further cultural comparisons are expected.
    METHODS: Standard translation procedure (i.e., forward translation, back translation, and reconciliation) was used to translate the English TAPAS into the Chinese TAPAS. Following translation, 608 youths (mean [SD] age 29.10 [6.36] years; 333 [54.8%] women) participated in the study via a snowballing sampling method with an online survey. All participants completed the Chinese TAPAS and additional instruments assessing weight stigma and psychological distress. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure of the Chinese TAPAS and multigroup CFA to examine measurement invariance across gender (men vs. women) and weight status (overweight vs. non-overweight). Pearson correlations were used to examine the concurrent validity; independent t-tests between gender groups and weight status groups were used to examine the known-group validity.
    RESULTS: Consistent with the English version, the Chinese TAPAS was found to have a one-factor structure evidenced by CFA results. The structure was invariant across gender and weight status groups evidenced by multigroup CFA results. Concurrent validity was supported by significant associations with the related constructs assessed (r = 0.326 to 0.676; p < 0.001). Known-group validity was supported by the significant differences in TAPAS total scores between gender and weight status groups (p = 0.004 and < 0.001; Cohen\'s d = 0.24 and 0.48).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the TAPAS is a valid and reliable instrument assessing individuals\' avoidance of physical activity and sports due to underlying psychosocial issues among Taiwanese youths. It is anticipated to be applied within a large Asian population, as well as cross-cultural comparisons, for further explorations in health, behavioral and epidemiological research and practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究旨在测试个人变化问卷(Q-PC)的捷克语翻译的心理测量特性,一种用于回顾性(直接)测量心理治疗变化的方法。
    使用一组心理治疗对象样本(N=222)和非临床样本(N=167)样本。除了几个前-后结果测量外,对临床样品中的客户施用Q-PC。验证性因素分析,相关分析,并采用结构方程模型对Q-PC的因子结构进行了检验,纵向测量不变性,可靠性,收敛有效性,对变化的敏感性,和其他心理测量属性。
    Q-PC展示了在两个后续测量波之间严格不变的一维结构。该措施还表现出优异的可靠性和对变化的敏感性以及良好的收敛有效性。此外,它显示与基线严重程度的关系与pre-post结局指标相似.
    对变化进行回顾性测量是一种有前途的方法,有可能补充传统的变化前的后测量。
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to test the psychometric properties of the Czech translation of the Questionnaire of Personal Changes (Q-PC), a measure designed for retrospective (direct) measurement of change in psychotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: A sample of group psychotherapy clients (N = 222) and a nonclinical sample (N = 167) sample were used. Clients in the clinical sample were administered the Q-PC in addition to several pre-post outcome measures. Confirmatory factor analysis, correlational analysis, and structural equation modeling were used to test the Q-PC\'s factor structure, longitudinal measurement invariance, reliability, convergent validity, sensitivity to change, and other psychometric properties.
    UNASSIGNED: The Q-PC demonstrated a unidimensional structure that was strictly invariant between two follow-up measurement waves. The measure also demonstrated excellent reliability and sensitivity to change and good convergent validity. Furthermore, it demonstrated a similar relationship to baseline severity as the pre-post outcome measures.
    UNASSIGNED: The retrospective measurement of change is a promising approach that has the potential to complement the traditional pre-post measurement of change.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肥料的有效管理对于影响水稻(OryzasativaL.)田间昆虫的流行至关重要。超过两年(2019-20年和2020-21年),在孟加拉国水稻研究所(BRRI)进行的一项实验,Habiganj,在boro季节,旨在通过测试化学肥料的各种组合及其对水稻昆虫的影响来确定最有效的多维处理(EMT)。目标是优化水稻产量,同时最大程度地减少有害昆虫的侵扰并支持天敌。八种不同的化肥使用如下:T1含有氮(N)的充分混合物,磷(P),钾(K),和硫(S);T2具有PKS,但缺少N;T3具有NKS,但缺少P;T4具有NPS,但缺少K;T5具有NPK,但缺少S;T6具有KS,但缺少N和P;T7具有PS,但缺少N和K;T8缺少所有四种元素-N,P,K,和S。有害昆虫的动态与天敌之间呈高度正相关(r=0.72至0.97)。在连续两年的成长中,2020-21赛季表现出明显更高的有害昆虫数量,水稻卷叶机(RLR)在孕穗期占主导地位,而白背飞虱(WBPH)在分till期占主导地位,当绿色MiridBug(GMB)在两个阶段的天敌中盛行时,超过害虫数量,特别是GMB,夫人鸟甲虫(LBB),甲虫(CDB),和葡萄球菌(STD)。然而,尽管有这些虫害压力,但2019-20年的生长季节产量明显更高。在整个中耕和引导阶段,T1始终表现出最高的有害昆虫和天敌的平均种群,虽然T7显示了最低数量的有害昆虫,其次是T2在两个生长阶段。此外,最高的粮食产量(GY)始终记录在T1,其次是T5,T6和T3,单产为7.98t/ha,7.63吨/公顷,7.38吨/公顷,和7.33吨/公顷,分别。在这两个阶段,在所有肥料施用中,有益昆虫胜过有害昆虫,T2和T7显著下降。因素分析显示,在2019-20赛季中,除了INT和GY之外,所有变量的MGIDI指数中EMT都被成功选择,选择差异(SD)范围为-0.10至8.29。然而,在2020-21年,所有变量均实现了选择,SD范围为0.37至6.08。根据MGIDI指数,在2019-20年期间,排名最高的EMT被确定为T4和T3,以及2020-21年期间的T3和T5。EMT在这两年分享了,T3,被证明是有效的,因为它在两个时期都对增强天敌具有积极影响(2019-20年的SD范围为4.76至8.29,2020-21年的SD范围为3.03至6.08),2020-21年对水稻籽粒产量的贡献显著(SD=0.37)。这项研究独特地整合了EMT,以优化水稻籽粒产量,同时管理有害昆虫的侵扰和支持天敌,解决可持续水稻种植的关键需求。建议优先使用T3的肥料,该肥料省略了P,但包含N和K,为了提高水稻产量和增强天敌,从而减少有害昆虫的侵扰。此外,未来的研究应集中在精炼肥料混合物上,以在水稻种植中实现产量最大化和生态稳健性之间的和谐。
    Effective management of fertilizers is essential in influencing the prevalence of insects in rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields. Over two years (2019-20 and 2020-21), an experiment conducted at Bangladesh Rice Research Institute (BRRI), Habiganj, during the boro season aimed to identify the most effective multidimensional treatment (EMT) by testing various combinations of chemical fertilizers and its effect on rice insects. The goal was to optimize rice grain yield while minimizing harmful insect infestation and supporting natural enemies. Eight different chemical fertilizer applications were used as follows: T1 contained a full mix of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulfur (S); T2 had PKS but lacked N; T3 had NKS but lacked P; T4 had NPS but lacked K; T5 had NPK but lacked S; T6 had KS but lacked N and P; T7 had PS but lacked N and K; and T8 lacked all four elements - N, P, K, and S. The relationship between the dynamics of harmful insects and natural enemies was highly positively correlated (r = 0.72 to 0.97). In two consecutive growing years, the 2020-21 season exhibited notably higher counts of harmful insects, with Rice Leafroller (RLR) dominating in the booting stage and White Backed Planthopper (WBPH) in mid-tillering, while Green Mirid Bug (GMB) prevailed among natural enemies across both stages, surpassing insect pest counts, notably GMB, Lady bird beetle (LBB), Carabid beetle (CDB), and Staphylinid (STD). However, the yield was notably higher in the 2019-20 growing season despite these pest pressures. Throughout the mid-tillering and booting stages, T1 consistently exhibited the highest average populations of harmful insects and natural enemies, while T7 demonstrated the lowest count of harmful insects, followed by T2 at both growth stages. Additionally, the highest grain yield (GY) was consistently recorded in T1, followed by T5, T6, and T3, with yields of 7.98 t/ha, 7.63 t/ha, 7.38 t/ha, and 7.33 t/ha, respectively. In both stages, beneficial insects prevailed over harmful ones in all fertilizer applications, with significant declines noted in T2 and T7. Factor analysis showed successful selection for EMT in the MGIDI index for all variables except INT and GY during the 2019-20 season, with selection differentials (SD) ranging from -0.10 to 8.29. However, in 2020-21, selection was achieved for all variables with SD ranging from 0.37 to 6.08. According to the MGIDI index, the top-ranked EMTs were identified as T4 and T3 for the 2019-20 period, and T3 and T5 for the 2020-21 period. The EMT shared in both years, T3, proved effective because of its positive impact on enhancing natural enemies throughout both periods (with SD ranging from 4.76 to 8.29 for 2019-20 and 3.03 to 6.08 for 2020-21), and its notable contribution to rice grain yield (SD = 0.37) in 2020-21. This study uniquely integrates EMT to optimize rice grain yield while simultaneously managing harmful insect infestations and supporting natural enemies, addressing a critical need in sustainable rice cultivation. The suggestion is to give preference to fertilizer application T3, which omits P but contains N and K, to improve rice grain yield and boost natural enemies, thereby reducing harmful insect infestation. Moreover, future investigations should concentrate on refining fertilizer blends to strike a harmony between maximizing yield and fostering ecological robustness in rice cultivation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在韩国,住院患者的经历显著影响满意度和治疗结果。这项研究开发并评估了住院患者经验测量量表(IEMS)的心理测量特性。
    使用便利抽样招募了来自三家医院的参与者。量表项目生成涉及患者访谈和专家的Delphi调查。心理测验使用150名参与者的探索性因素分析(EFA)和151名参与者的验证性因素分析(CFA)。
    共有301名患者参加,产生了20个项目的量表,涵盖了四个因素:“护理质量和信息提供”,“患者安全和饮食服务”,“设施和舒适基础设施”,和“全面的患者支持服务”。以5分的李克特量表评分,量表显示高含量有效性指数(CVI)超过0.80。EFA解释了61.43%的差异。使用具有良好拟合指数的CFA验证了四因素模型。IEMS表现出很强的收敛有效性,由高复合可靠性(CR)和平均方差提取(AVE)值支持。与患者满意度量表的显着相关性增强了其收敛有效性。确认了判别有效性,并且所有可靠性测量都超过了0.80的最小阈值。
    IEMS有效捕获住院患者的经验,表现出稳健的可靠性和有效性。该量表是评估患者体验的宝贵工具,促进医院环境中患者护理和满意度的增强。
    UNASSIGNED: In South Korea, hospitalized patients\' experiences significantly impact satisfaction and treatment outcomes. This study developed and evaluated the Inpatients Experience Measurement Scale (IEMS) for its psychometric properties.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants from three hospitals were recruited using convenience sampling. Scale item generation involved patient interviews and a Delphi survey with experts. Psychometric testing used Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with 150 participants and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with 151 participants.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 301 patients participated, resulting in a 20-item scale across four factors: \"Care Quality and Information Provision\", \"Patient Safety and Dietary Services\", \"Facility and Comfort Infrastructure\", and \"Comprehensive Patient Support Services\". Rated on a 5-point Likert scale, the scale showed a high Content Validity Index (CVI) over 0.80. EFA explained 61.43% of the variance. The four-factor model was validated using CFA with favorable fit indices. The IEMS demonstrated strong convergent validity, supported by high composite reliability (CR) and average variance extracted (AVE) values. Significant correlations with the Patient Satisfaction Scale reinforced its convergent validity. Discriminant validity was confirmed, and all reliability measures exceeded the minimum threshold of 0.80.
    UNASSIGNED: The IEMS effectively captures inpatients\' experiences, demonstrating robust reliability and validity. This scale is a valuable tool for assessing patient experiences, facilitating enhancements in patient care and satisfaction within hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该数据集广泛检查了选择甘薯基因型时考虑的因素,考虑到各种特点。值得注意的是,Moz1.15表现出最高的可销售根系产量,为46.46吨/公顷,H5.ej.10表现出最高的β-胡萝卜素水平,为48.94毫克/100克,Moz1.9记录了最高的维生素C含量,为23.89mg/100g。此外,在甘薯中研究的产量和品质性状之间存在显着相关性(从0.21到0.84)。主成分分析(PCA)证实了这些性状之间的联系,确定四个不同的基因型簇,每种特征都具有特定的显著性状组合。使用多性状基因型-理想型指数(MGIDI)的因子分析强调了甘薯性状在两个生长季节(2020-21和2021-22)的显着影响。促进选择潜在遗传增益为1.86%至75.4%的基因型。广义遗传力(h2)从64.9%到99.8%不等。MGIDI指数的使用确定了几种有希望的基因型,BARIMistialu-12和H9.7.12在这两年中一直表现良好。这些基因型表现出优点和缺点。
    The dataset extensively examines the factors considered when choosing sweet potato genotypes, considering various characteristics. Notably, Moz1.15 demonstrated the highest marketable root yield at 46.46 t/ha, H5.ej.10 exhibited the highest beta-carotene level at 48.94 mg/100 g, and Moz1.9 recorded the highest vitamin C content at 23.89 mg/100 g. Moreover, there were significant correlations (ranging from 0.21 to 0.84) among the yield and quality traits studied in sweet potatoes. Principal component analysis (PCA) confirmed the connections among these traits, identifying four distinct clusters of genotypes, each characterized by specific significant combinations of traits. Factor analysis using the multi-trait genotype-ideotype index (MGIDI) highlighted the considerable impact of sweet potato traits across two growing seasons (2020-21 and 2021-22), facilitating the selection of genotypes with potential genetic gains ranging from 1.86 % to 75.4 %. Broad-sense heritability (h2) varied from 64.9 % to 99.8 %. The use of the MGIDI index pinpointed several promising genotypes, with BARI Mistialu-12 and H9.7.12 consistently performing well over both years. These genotypes exhibited both strengths and weaknesses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抑郁症的17项汉密尔顿评定量表(HRSD-17)是抗抑郁药临床试验中最受欢迎的抑郁症衡量标准。先前的证据表明,可复制性差,阶乘结构不一致。这还没有在汇总随机试验数据中进行研究,也没有开发出心理上的最佳模型。
    目的:在抗抑郁药随机对照试验参与者的大型汇总数据库中,研究HRSD-17对治疗前和治疗后临床试验数据的心理测量特性,并确定最佳的缩写版本。
    方法:从数据库Vivli.org获得6843名参与者的数据,并随机分成几组进行探索性(n=3421)和验证性(n=3422)因素分析。不变性方法用于评估潜在的性别差异。
    结果:对于所有模型,HRSD-17在心理上都是次优且非不变的。高项目方差和低方差解释了每个模型中的建议冗余。EFA在基线时失败,并为结果组产生了四个项目模型(安慰剂结果为五个),它们是公制的,但不是标量不变的。
    结论:在抗抑郁药试验数据中,HRSD-17在心理测量方面不足,并且评分不具有性别不变性.完整或缩写的HRSD模型均不适合在临床试验环境中使用,并且应重新考虑HRSD作为黄金标准的地位。
    BACKGROUND: The 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) is the most popular depression measure in antidepressant clinical trials. Prior evidence indicates poor replicability and inconsistent factorial structure. This has not been studied in pooled randomised trial data, nor has a psychometrically optimal model been developed.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychometric properties of the HRSD-17 for pre-treatment and post-treatment clinical trial data in a large pooled database of antidepressant randomised controlled trial participants, and to determine an optimal abbreviated version.
    METHODS: Data for 6843 participants were obtained from the data repository Vivli.org and randomly split into groups for exploratory (n = 3421) and confirmatory (n = 3422) factor analysis. Invariance methods were used to assess potential sex differences.
    RESULTS: The HRSD-17 was psychometrically sub-optimal and non-invariant for all models. High item variances and low variance explained suggested redundancy in each model. EFA failed at baseline and produced four item models for outcome groups (five for placebo-outcome), which were metric but not scalar invariant.
    CONCLUSIONS: In antidepressant trial data, the HRSD-17 was psychometrically inadequate and scores were not sex invariant. Neither full nor abbreviated HRSD models are suitable for use in clinical trial settings and the HRSD\'s status as the gold standard should be reconsidered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号