Factor analysis

因子分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19保护行为是世界卫生组织(WHO)建议的预防COVID-19传播的关键干预措施。然而,实现遵守这一建议通常是具有挑战性的,特别是在社会弱势群体中。
    目的:我们制定了社会脆弱性指数(SVI),以预测个人遵守世卫组织关于COVID-19保护性行为建议的倾向,并确定随着Omicron在2022年1月至2022年8月期间在非洲国家和2021年8月至2022年6月期间在亚太国家的演变,社会脆弱性的变化。
    方法:在非洲国家,在第一次Omicron波期间,从14个国家(n=15,375)收集了基线数据,随访数据来自7个国家(n=7179)。在亚太国家,在第一次Omicron波之前,从14个国家(n=12,866)收集了基线数据,随访数据来自9个国家(n=8737)。从相关数据库检索国家的社会经济和健康概况。要为4个数据集中的每个数据集构建SVI,与COVID-19保护行为相关的变量被纳入使用多脉络线相关性和varimax旋转的因子分析中.对影响因素进行了基数调整,求和,和最小值-最大值从0归一化到1(最脆弱到最不脆弱)。遵守世卫组织建议的分数是使用个人自我报告的针对COVID-19的保护行为计算的。使用多元线性回归分析来评估SVI与对WHO建议的依从性评分之间的关联,以验证该指数。
    结果:在非洲,导致社会脆弱性的因素包括识字和媒体使用,对医护人员和政府的信任,国家收入和基础设施。在亚太地区,社会脆弱性是由识字决定的,国家收入和基础设施,和人口密度。该指数与非洲国家在两个时间点遵守世卫组织建议有关,但仅在亚太国家的后续行动期间。在基线,非洲国家的指数值在13个国家从0.00到0.31之间,1个国家的指数值为1.00。亚太国家的指数值在12个国家从0.00到0.23之间,2个国家的指数值为0.79和1.00。在后续阶段,7个非洲国家中的6个和2个最脆弱的亚太国家的指数值下降。两个区域最脆弱国家的指数值保持不变。
    结论:在这两个地区,在基线时观察到社会对遵守世卫组织建议的脆弱性存在显著不平等,在第一次Omicron波之后,间隙变得更大。了解影响社会对COVID-19保护性行为的脆弱性的维度可能会支持有针对性的干预措施,以增强对WHO建议的遵守,并减轻弱势群体未来大流行的影响。
    BACKGROUND: COVID-19 protective behaviors are key interventions advised by the World Health Organization (WHO) to prevent COVID-19 transmission. However, achieving compliance with this advice is often challenging, particularly among socially vulnerable groups.
    OBJECTIVE: We developed a social vulnerability index (SVI) to predict individuals\' propensity to adhere to the WHO advice on protective behaviors against COVID-19 and identify changes in social vulnerability as Omicron evolved in African countries between January 2022 and August 2022 and Asia Pacific countries between August 2021 and June 2022.
    METHODS: In African countries, baseline data were collected from 14 countries (n=15,375) during the first Omicron wave, and follow-up data were collected from 7 countries (n=7179) after the wave. In Asia Pacific countries, baseline data were collected from 14 countries (n=12,866) before the first Omicron wave, and follow-up data were collected from 9 countries (n=8737) after the wave. Countries\' socioeconomic and health profiles were retrieved from relevant databases. To construct the SVI for each of the 4 data sets, variables associated with COVID-19 protective behaviors were included in a factor analysis using polychoric correlation with varimax rotation. Influential factors were adjusted for cardinality, summed, and min-max normalized from 0 to 1 (most to least vulnerable). Scores for compliance with the WHO advice were calculated using individuals\' self-reported protective behaviors against COVID-19. Multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess the associations between the SVI and scores for compliance to WHO advice to validate the index.
    RESULTS: In Africa, factors contributing to social vulnerability included literacy and media use, trust in health care workers and government, and country income and infrastructure. In Asia Pacific, social vulnerability was determined by literacy, country income and infrastructure, and population density. The index was associated with compliance with the WHO advice in both time points in African countries but only during the follow-up period in Asia Pacific countries. At baseline, the index values in African countries ranged from 0.00 to 0.31 in 13 countries, with 1 country having an index value of 1.00. The index values in Asia Pacific countries ranged from 0.00 to 0.23 in 12 countries, with 2 countries having index values of 0.79 and 1.00. During the follow-up phase, the index values decreased in 6 of 7 African countries and the 2 most vulnerable Asia Pacific countries. The index values of the least vulnerable countries remained unchanged in both regions.
    CONCLUSIONS: In both regions, significant inequalities in social vulnerability to compliance with WHO advice were observed at baseline, and the gaps became larger after the first Omicron wave. Understanding the dimensions that influence social vulnerability to protective behaviors against COVID-19 may underpin targeted interventions to enhance compliance with WHO recommendations and mitigate the impact of future pandemics among vulnerable groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:建立一种新型的可植入结缘晶状体(ICL)植入后的拱顶预测公式,该公式考虑了具有多模态参数的前后房特征。
    方法:共103和65只眼被纳入开发和验证组,分别。使用来自开发组的光学相干断层扫描和超声生物显微镜的数据进行探索性因素分析,以合成具有不同临床意义的总结因素。使用逐步方法筛选具有显著因子重负荷(负荷系数绝对值>0.5)的显性原始指标用于多元线性回归模型。对新得出的公式进行了评估,并与验证组中的NK和KS公式进行了比较。
    结果:六个因素(前房角,水平宽度,镜头,虹膜,虹膜纤毛复合物和睫状体)通过因子分析缩小尺寸后生成。因素2(水平宽度),3(镜头),5(虹膜纤毛复合物)对穹窿有显著影响。当这些因素的主导指标被筛选用于进一步的模型构建时,ICL尺寸,前房宽度,晶状体上升,虹膜曲率,虹膜-睫状突距离保留在最终公式中,调整后的R2为0.698,绝对误差中值为81.97mm,均方根误差为103.35mm。
    结论:多个眼内成分,包括镜头,虹膜,和睫状体,在金库确定中发挥重要作用。新公式对保险库预测和ICL大小建议具有良好的准确性。
    BACKGROUND: To establish a novel vault prediction formula after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation that considers both anterior and posterior chamber characteristics with multi-modal parameters.
    METHODS: A total of 103 and 65 eyes were included in the development and validation groups, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis was performed using data from optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy in the development group to synthesise summative factors with different clinical significance. Dominant original metrics with heavy loadings on significant factors (absolute value of the loading coefficient >0.5) were screened for multivariate linear regression models using a stepwise method. The newly derived formula was evaluated and compared to the NK and KS formulas in the validation group.
    RESULTS: Six factors (anterior chamber angle, horizontal width, lens, iris, iridociliary complex and ciliary body) were generated after dimension reduction via factor analysis. Factors 2 (horizontal width), 3 (lens), and 5 (iridociliary complex) had a significant influence on the vault. When dominant metrics on these factors were screened for further model building, ICL size, anterior chamber width, crystalline lens rise, iris curvature, and iris-ciliary process distance were retained in the final formula, with an adjusted R2 of 0.698, a median absolute error of 81.97 mm, and a root-mean-square error of 103.35 mm.
    CONCLUSIONS: Multiple intraocular components, including the lens, iris, and ciliary body, play important roles in vault determination. The new formula exhibits good accuracy for vault predictions and ICL size recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在开发文化适应的中文版基于价值的污名量表(VASI),并评估其心理测量特性,包括信度和效度,在一般中国人口中。
    方法:本研究为横断面研究。采用便利抽样方式,从沈阳市招募普通市民708人,辽宁省,中国。VASI的内部一致性,半分割可靠性,测试重测信度,以评估翻译量表的信度。进行了几次有效性测试,包括专家咨询,探索性因素分析,和验证性因素分析。使用SPSS25.0(IBMCorp.,Armonk,NY,美国)和AMOS23.0(IBMCorp.,Armonk,NY,美国)。
    结果:中文版的VASI显示出良好的可靠性,Cronbach的α值为0.808,尺寸范围为0.812至0.850。重测信度表现出良好的时间稳定性,值为0.855,分半信度值为0.845,表明高度的一致性。该量表还显示出良好的内容效度,内容效度指数为0.952。在进行探索性因素分析后,确定了一个五因素结构,包括自我实现的因素,个人致富,声誉,精英价值观,和安全。在验证性因素分析中,所有推荐的配合指标均在可接受范围内,其中χ2/DF=1.338,GFI=0.960,AGFI=0.940,RMSEA=0.031,TLI=0.985,CFI=0.989,FI=0.989,PGFI=0.640,PNFI=0.729。
    结论:VASI的中文版在中国公众中有效可靠。五因素结构化量表有效评估了公众对精神疾病的污名,包括与个人污名相关的价值取向。鉴于公众对精神疾病的严重和广泛的污名,问卷的结果可能为未来公共卫生教育计划的发展提供信息。需要进行公共卫生教育以减少精神疾病的污名,提高公众对心理健康问题的认识,减轻对精神疾病的持续污名化。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a culturally adapted Chinese version of the Value-based Stigma Inventory (VASI) and to evaluate its psychometric properties, including reliability and validity, among the general Chinese population.
    METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional study. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 708 general citizens from Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, China. The VASI\'s internal consistency, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability were tested to assess the translated scale\'s reliability. Several validity tests were performed, including expert consultation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) and AMOS 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States).
    RESULTS: The Chinese version of the VASI showed good reliability, with a Cronbach\'s α value of 0.808, and the dimensions ranged from 0.812 to 0.850. Test-retest reliability showed good temporal stability with a value of 0.855, and the split-half reliability value was 0.845, indicating a high degree of consistency. The scale also demonstrated good content validity with a content validity index of 0.952. After conducting exploratory factor analysis, a five-factor structure was identified, including factors of self-realization, personal enrichment, reputation, meritocratic values, and security. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all recommended fit indicators were found to be within the acceptable range, including χ2/DF = 1.338, GFI = 0.960, AGFI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.031, TLI = 0.985, CFI = 0.989, IFI = 0.989, PGFI = 0.640, and PNFI = 0.729.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the VASI is valid and reliable among the Chinese general public. The five-factor structured scale effectively assessed public stigma against mental illness, including the value orientations associated with personal stigma. Given the harsh and widespread public stigma against mental illness, the findings from the questionnaire may inform the development of future public health education programs. Public health education is needed to reduce the stigma of mental illness, increase public awareness of mental health issues, and mitigate the continued stigmatization of mental illness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    家庭暴力(DV)在中国是一个重要的问题。目前,很少有标准化的测量工具来衡量中国利益相关者对DV的看法和信念。这项研究试图验证与这些利益相关者一起使用的工具。因子分析用于横截面,调查数据来自广东四个机构的683名中国DV专业人员的目的样本。分析开发了三种测量DV定义的量表,DV态度,DV警务。这些量表的发展有利于以与中国背景相关的方式推进与中国DV相关的已经在增长的研究。
    Domestic violence (DV) is a significant concern within China. Currently, there are few standardized measurement tools to gauge Chinese stakeholders\' perceptions and beliefs concerning DV. This research sought to validate tools to be used with such stakeholders. Factor analyses were utilized on cross-sectional, survey data from a purposive sample of 683 Chinese DV professionals working in four institutions in Guangdong. Analyses developed three scales for measuring DV Definitions, DV Attitudes, and DV Policing. The development of these scales is beneficial to advance the already growing research related to DV in China in ways that are relevant to the Chinese context.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文以华北地区县级粮食生产和粮食安全为研究对象;从气候条件和人类活动两方面选取17个指标;应用产量波动系数,空间计量经济模型,随机森林方法,因素分析,研究华北地区粮食生产特点及影响因素,并基于粮食生产能力对华北地区粮食安全状况进行评价。得到了以下研究结果:(1)2000-2020年华北粮食产量时空变化明显。2000-2020年华北地区粮食产量以0.38×1011kg/10a的速度波动增长。东部和南部是华北粮食生产的重点地区。除2003年外,粮食产量相对稳定。粮食生产的冷点主要在西北地区,热点地区在中部和南部地区。(2)2000-2020年华北地区粮食产量变化受气候影响较小,主要受人类活动指标影响。(3)随着时间的推移,粮食短缺区面积缩小,从最初的集中在河北北部和山西大部分地区开始变得均匀分布和分散;供需平衡区的变化不明显;富余粮食区的面积明显增加,具有从研究区域的南部和中心向西部和北部扩展的趋势。西北,北方各县粮食生产能力普遍偏低,甚至位于粮食过剩地区的县也存在潜在的粮食安全风险。然而,在东部和南部,由于他们的高粮食生产能力,即使在粮食短缺地区的县,人均粮食供应状况也可能得到缓解。本研究可以加深对华北地区粮食生产特点的认识,丰富粮食安全研究。对影响粮食生产的因素进行分析,将加深对粮食安全的认识。基于粮食生产能力的粮食安全评价有助于更准确、全面地认识华北地区的粮食安全格局。
    This paper focuses on county-level grain production and food security in North China; selects 17 indicators from both climatic conditions and human activities; applies yield fluctuation coefficients, spatial econometric modelling, the random forest method, and factor analysis to study the characteristics of grain production in North China and the influencing factors; and evaluates the situation of food security in North China based on grain production capacity. The following results were obtained: (1) The spatial and temporal changes in grain production located in North China from 2000 to 2020 are obvious. The grain output in North China from 2000 to 2020 maintains fluctuating growth at a rate of 0.38 × 1011 kg/10a. The east and south are the key areas for grain production in North China. Grain output was relatively stable except for 2003. with the cold spots of grain production being mainly in the northwestern area and the hot spots in the central and southern areas. (2) The changes in grain production in North China from 2000 to 2020 were less affected by climate and mainly influenced by human activity indicators. (3) As time progresses, the area of food shortage zones decreases in size, becoming evenly distributed and dispersed from the initial concentration in northern Hebei and most of Shanxi; the change in the supply-demand equilibrium zones is not obvious; and the area of surplus grain zones increases markedly in size, with a tendency to expand from the south and centre of the study area to the west and north. The grain production capacity of counties in the northwest and north is generally low, and even counties located in surplus grain areas have potential food security risks. However, in the east and south, due to their high grain production capacity, the per capita grain supply situation may be alleviated even in counties located in grain shortage areas. This study can deepen the understanding of the characteristics of food production in North China and enrich the research on food security. Analyses of factors influencing food production will improve a deeper understanding of food security. Food security evaluation based on food production capacity will contribute to a more precise and comprehensive understanding of the food security pattern in North China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    恐怖主义是指制造社会恐慌的主张和行为,危害公共安全,侵犯人身和财产,或者通过暴力威胁国家机关和组织实现政治和意识形态目标,破坏,恐吓和其他手段。根据调查,世界上92%的国家都遭受过不同程度的恐怖袭击,涉及南美,中东和北非。自1970年以来,全世界发生了大约20万起恐怖事件。全球恐怖袭击的目标范围很广,涉及近20个团体,导致多达28万人死亡和36万人受伤。基于GTD数据库,本文选取1998-2017年的相关数据,运用因子分析模型,从恐怖袭击危害角度建立恐怖袭击危害评价指标体系。同时,GIS用于数据的定量分析,时间序列模型用于相关性预测。结果表明,恐怖袭击综合评价模型客观、准确地评价了近20年来的恐怖袭击,其中9/11事件危害程度最高,随后是萨拉姆大使馆爆炸案。事件危害性排序与国内外主流媒体的报道基本一致。从恐怖袭击的全球空间范围来看,恐怖袭击正从北非和阿拉伯半岛转移到东部前线,中东继续聚集,中东恐怖袭击的形势不容乐观。目前和未来一段时间,国际恐怖主义将保持在高水平,恐怖袭击仍将集中在中东和阿拉伯半岛。
    Terrorism refers to the claims and acts that create social panic, endanger public security, infringe upon persons and property, or threaten state organs and organizations to achieve political and ideological goals through violence, sabotage, intimidation and other means. According to the survey, 92 % of the world\'s countries have been subjected to terrorist attacks to varying degrees, involving South America, the Middle East and North Africa. Since 1970, there have been about 200,000 terrorist incidents worldwide. Global terrorist attacks have a wide range of targets, involving nearly 20 groups, resulting in up to 280,000 deaths and 360,000 injuries. Based on the GTD database, this paper selects the relevant data from 1998 to 2017, and uses the factor analysis model to establish the evaluation index system of terrorist attack harm from the perspective of terrorist attack harm. At the same time, GIS is used for quantitative analysis of the data, and time series model is used for correlation prediction. The results show that the comprehensive evaluation model of terrorist attacks has objectively and accurately evaluated the terrorist attacks in the past 20 years, among which 9/11 incident has the highest degree of harm, followed by the Salam Embassy bombing. The ranking of the harmfulness of the incident is basically consistent with the reports of mainstream media at home and abroad. From the perspective of the global spatial scope of terrorist attacks, terrorist attacks are shifting from North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula to the eastern front, and the Middle East has continued to gather, and the situation of terrorist attacks in the Middle East is not optimistic. At present and for some time to come, international terrorism will remain at a high level, and terrorist attacks will remain concentrated in the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于硬件配置的变化,多变量校准模型在外推校准仪器方面经常遇到挑战。信号处理算法,或环境条件。已经开发了校准传递技术来缓解这个问题。在这项研究中,我们介绍了一种称为监督因子分析转移(SFAT)的新方法,旨在实现稳健和可解释的校准转移。SFAT从概率框架运行,并将响应变量集成到其传输过程中,以有效地将目标仪器的数据与源仪器的数据对齐。在SFAT模型中,来自源仪器的数据,目标仪器,并且响应变量被共同投影到一组共享的潜在变量上。这些潜在变量作为三个不同领域之间信息传递的管道,从而促进有效的光谱转移。此外,SFAT明确建模与每个变量相关的噪声方差,从而最大限度地减少非信息噪声的传输。此外,我们提供了经验证据,展示了SFAT在三个真实世界数据集的有效性,在校准转移方案中展示其卓越的性能。
    Multivariate calibration models often encounter challenges in extrapolating beyond the calibration instruments due to variations in hardware configurations, signal processing algorithms, or environmental conditions. Calibration transfer techniques have been developed to mitigate this issue. In this study, we introduce a novel methodology known as Supervised Factor Analysis Transfer (SFAT) aimed at achieving robust and interpretable calibration transfer. SFAT operates from a probabilistic framework and integrates response variables into its transfer process to effectively align data from the target instrument to that of the source instrument. Within the SFAT model, the data from the source instrument, the target instrument, and the response variables are collectively projected onto a shared set of latent variables. These latent variables serve as the conduit for information transfer between the three distinct domains, thereby facilitating effective spectra transfer. Moreover, SFAT explicitly models the noise variances associated with each variable, thereby minimizing the transfer of non-informative noise. Furthermore, we provide empirical evidence showcasing the efficacy of SFAT across three real-world datasets, demonstrating its superior performance in calibration transfer scenarios.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    问卷冷漠评估量表-自我(AES-S)已在全球范围内广泛采用,具有较高的信度和效度。然而,将AES直接翻译成中文不太适合中国的文化背景,因此,需要进行结构化和全面的修订,以获得高信度和效度的量表版本。
    在这项研究中,来自北京两个社区的436名年龄≥60岁的成年人使用改良的AES-S进行了评估。方法包括项目分析,探索性因素分析,和验证性因素分析。使用快乐时间体验量表(TEPS)和简易精神状态检查(MMSE)测试量表的有效性。可靠性评估包括重新测试可靠性,内部一致性可靠性,和半分割的可靠性。
    改良的冷漠评估量表-自我评估(AES-S-C)在中国老年人社区中呈现一阶四因素结构,具有比原始版本更高的信度和效度。
    修订后的AES-S-C更适合社区环境中的中国老年人。
    该自评量表适用于在社区或护理机构中筛查老年人的冷漠,帮助识别认知障碍并促进心理健康。
    UNASSIGNED: The questionnaire Apathy Evaluation Scale-Self (AES-S) has been widely adopted globally, demonstrating high reliability and validity. However, direct translation of the AES into Chinese does not fit well into the Chinese cultural setting, so a structured and comprehensive revision is needed to obtain a high reliability and validity version of the scale.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, 436 adults aged ≥ 60 years from two communities in Beijing were assessed using a modified AES-S. The methodology included item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The scale\'s validity was tested using the Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale (TEPS) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Reliability assessment included retest reliability, internal consistency reliability, and split-half reliability.
    UNASSIGNED: The modified Apathy Evaluation Scale-Self-Assessment (AES-S-C) presented a first-order four-factor structure with higher reliability and validity than the original version within the Chinese older adult community.
    UNASSIGNED: The revised AES-S-C is more suitable for the Chinese older adults in community settings.
    UNASSIGNED: This self-rated scale is suitable for screening apathy among older adults in community or nursing facilities, aiding in the identification of cognitive impairment and promoting mental health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:心理社会因素影响个体对体力活动的渴望。设计了一种新开发的仪器(避免身体活动和运动的趋势;TAPAS)来评估避免身体活动。考虑到文化差异可能是决定性因素,本研究旨在为台湾青年翻译和验证TAPAS为中文(普通话),预计将进行进一步的文化比较。
    方法:标准翻译程序(即,正向翻译,回译,andreconciliation)wasusedtotranslatetheEnglishTAPASintotheChineseTAPAS.翻译之后,608名青年(平均[SD]年龄29.10[6.36]岁;333[54.8%]女性)通过滚雪球抽样方法和在线调查参与了这项研究。所有参与者都完成了中国TAPAS和其他评估体重污名和心理困扰的工具。验证性因子分析(CFA)用于检查中国TAPAS和多组CFA的因子结构,以检查性别之间的测量不变性(男性与女性)和体重状况(超重与不超重)。Pearson相关性用于检查并发有效性;性别组和体重状态组之间的独立t检验用于检查已知组有效性。
    结果:与英文版一致,CFA结果证明了中国TAPAS具有单因素结构。多组CFA结果证明了性别和体重状态组的结构不变。并发有效性得到与相关结构的显着关联的支持(r=0.326至0.676;p<0.001)。性别和体重状态组之间TAPAS总分的显着差异支持了已知组的有效性(p=0.004和<0.001;Cohen\sd=0.24和0.48)。
    结论:中文版的TAPAS是一个有效和可靠的工具,用于评估台湾青少年由于潜在的社会心理问题而避免体力活动和运动。预计将在大量亚洲人口中应用,以及跨文化比较,为了进一步探索健康,行为和流行病学研究与实践。
    OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial factors affect individuals\' desire for physical activity. A newly developed instrument (Tendency to Avoid Physical Activity and Sport; TAPAS) has been designed to assess the avoidance of physical activity. Considering cultural differences could be decisive factors, the present study aimed to translate and validate the TAPAS into Chinese (Mandarin) for Taiwanese youths, and further cultural comparisons are expected.
    METHODS: Standard translation procedure (i.e., forward translation, back translation, and reconciliation) was used to translate the English TAPAS into the Chinese TAPAS. Following translation, 608 youths (mean [SD] age 29.10 [6.36] years; 333 [54.8%] women) participated in the study via a snowballing sampling method with an online survey. All participants completed the Chinese TAPAS and additional instruments assessing weight stigma and psychological distress. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure of the Chinese TAPAS and multigroup CFA to examine measurement invariance across gender (men vs. women) and weight status (overweight vs. non-overweight). Pearson correlations were used to examine the concurrent validity; independent t-tests between gender groups and weight status groups were used to examine the known-group validity.
    RESULTS: Consistent with the English version, the Chinese TAPAS was found to have a one-factor structure evidenced by CFA results. The structure was invariant across gender and weight status groups evidenced by multigroup CFA results. Concurrent validity was supported by significant associations with the related constructs assessed (r = 0.326 to 0.676; p < 0.001). Known-group validity was supported by the significant differences in TAPAS total scores between gender and weight status groups (p = 0.004 and < 0.001; Cohen\'s d = 0.24 and 0.48).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the TAPAS is a valid and reliable instrument assessing individuals\' avoidance of physical activity and sports due to underlying psychosocial issues among Taiwanese youths. It is anticipated to be applied within a large Asian population, as well as cross-cultural comparisons, for further explorations in health, behavioral and epidemiological research and practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是介绍,翻译,并在中国背景下验证患者参与量表(PPS)。
    我们应用了内部一致性测试的组合,项目分析,探索性因素分析,和验证性因素分析。这项研究涉及453人,包括门诊病人和住院病人,横跨中国锦州医科大学附属三家医院。此外,一个50例患者的亚组在2周后接受了重新测试,以评估可靠性.
    PPS的改编中文版包括21个项目。探索性因素分析确定了四个不同的因素,占总方差的66.199%。验证性因素分析支持合适的四因素结构(χ/df:2.045,RMSEA:0.048,GFI:0.935,AGFI:0.914,TLI:0.958,CFI:0.965,PGFI:0.712)。与每个项目相对应的因子载荷超过0.6,提取的平均方差(AVE)超过0.5,复合可靠性(CR)超过0.7。相关系数保持在AVE的平方根以下,表现出相对良好的收敛效度和判别效度。中文PPS版本显示出高内部一致性(Cronbach'salpha:0.919),尺寸为Cronbach的α范围为0.732至0.918。分割和重新测试的可靠性分别为0.737和0.864。中文PPS版的内容效度指数为0.974。
    PPS的中文版成为评估患者参与治疗和护理的有效和可靠的工具。适用于住院和门诊设置。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this research was to introduce, translate, and verify the Patient Participation Scale (PPS) within a Chinese context.
    UNASSIGNED: We applied a combination of internal consistency testing, item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The research involved 453 individuals, comprising both outpatients and inpatients, across three Jinzhou Medical University-affiliated hospitals in China. Additionally, a subgroup of 50 patients underwent a retest after a 2-week interval to assess reliability.
    UNASSIGNED: The adapted Chinese edition of the PPS included 21 items. Exploratory factor analysis identified four distinct factors, accounting for 66.199% of the total variance. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a suitable four-factor structure ( χ / d f : 2.045, RMSEA: 0.048, GFI: 0.935, AGFI: 0.914, TLI: 0.958, CFI: 0.965, and PGFI: 0.712). The factor loadings corresponded to each item exceeded 0.6, the average variance extracted (AVE) exceeded 0.5, and the composite reliability (CR) exceeded 0.7. The correlation coefficients stayed below the square root of the AVE, demonstrated relatively favourable convergent and discriminant validity.The Chinese PPS edition demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach\'s alpha: 0.919), with dimensional Cronbach\'s alpha ranged from 0.732 to 0.918. Split-half as well as retest reliabilities were recorded at 0.737 and 0.864, respectively. The content validity index for the Chinese PPS edition stood at 0.974.
    UNASSIGNED: The Chinese edition of the PPS emerges as a valid and reliable tool for assessing patient engagement in their own treatment as well as care, applicable in both inpatient as well as outpatient settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号