目的:评价38%二氟化银(SDF)溶液对人恒牙牙釉质和牙本质的防蚀作用。
方法:从恒牙中制备90个牙釉质和90个牙本质块,并分为三组。Gp-SDF收到了38%SDF解决方案的一次性申请。Gp-SNF接受一次性应用含有800ppm氯化亚锡和500ppm氟化物的溶液。Gp-DW接受一次性施加的去离子水。块在pH3.2下接受酸攻击,2分钟,5次/天持续7天。所有块在循环之间浸入人唾液中1小时。水晶的特性,表面显微硬度损失百分比(%SMHL),表面损失,元素分析和表面形貌进行了X射线衍射(XRD),显微硬度试验,非接触轮廓术,和能量色散X射线光谱(EDS)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM),分别。通过单向ANOVA分析%SMHL和表面损失的数据。
结果:XRD光谱显示,在Gp-SDF中形成了氟磷灰石和银化合物,而氟磷灰石和亚锡化合物在Gp-SNF中形成。Gp-DW仅呈现羟基磷灰石。Gp-SDF中%SMHL的中位数(四分位数间距),Gp-SNF和Gp-DW分别为27.86(3.66),43.41(2.45),牙釉质成分为46.40(3.54)(p<0.001),和14.21(1.57),27.99(1.95),牙本质和33.18(1.73),分别(p<0.001)。平均值(标准偏差,μm)的Gp-SDF表面损耗,Gp-SNF,Gp-DW为2.81(0.59),4.28(0.67),牙釉质中的4.63(0.64)(p<0.001)和4.13(0.69),6.04(0.61),牙本质为7.72(0.66),分别(p<0.001)。与Gp-SNF和Gp-DW相比,SEM图像在Gp-SDF中显示出较少的牙釉质腐败和较多的牙本质小管闭塞。EDS分析显示在Gp-SDF中检测到银,而在Gp-SNF的牙质块中检测到亚锡。
结论:与SNF和DW相比,38%的SDF在保护牙釉质和牙本质块免受牙齿侵蚀方面产生了更好的结果。
结论:局部应用38%SDF可有效预防人牙釉质和牙本质的牙齿侵蚀。
To evaluate the erosion preventive effect of 38 % silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution in enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth.
Ninety enamel and ninety dentin blocks were prepared from permanent molars and allocated into three groups. Gp-SDF received a one-off application of 38 % SDF solution. Gp-SNF received a one-off application of a solution containing 800 ppm stannous chloride and 500 ppm fluoride. Gp-DW received a one-off application of deionized water. The blocks were submitted to acid challenge at pH 3.2, 2 min, 5 times/day for 7 days. All blocks were immersed in human saliva between cycles for one hour. The crystal characteristics, percentage of surface microhardness loss (%SMHL), surface loss, and elemental analysis and surface morphology were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD), microhardness test, non-contact profilometry, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Data of%SMHL and surface loss were analyzed by one-way ANOVA.
XRD spectra revealed that fluorapatite and silver compounds formed in Gp-SDF, while fluorapatite and stannous compounds formed in Gp-SNF. Gp-DW presented only hydroxyapatite. The median (interquartile range) of%SMHL in Gp-SDF, Gp-SNF and Gp-DW were 27.86(3.66), 43.41(2.45), and 46.40(3.54) in enamel (p< 0.001), and 14.21(1.57), 27.99(1.95), and 33.18(1.73) in dentin, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean (standard deviation, μm) of surface loss of Gp-SDF, Gp-SNF, and Gp-DW were 2.81(0.59), 4.28(0.67), and 4.63(0.64) in enamel (p < 0.001) and 4.13(0.69), 6.04(0.61), and 7.72(0.66) in dentin, respectively (p < 0.001). SEM images exhibited less enamel corruption and more dentinal tubular occlusion in Gp-SDF compared to Gp-SNF and Gp-DW. EDS analysis showed silver was detected in Gp-SDF while stannous was detected in the dentin block of Gp-SNF.
38 % SDF yielded superior results in protecting enamel and dentin blocks from dental erosion compared to SNF and DW.
Topical application of 38 % SDF is effective in preventing dental erosion in human enamel and dentin.