• 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:LGBTQ+患者经历更高的生命限制疾病负担,较差的健康结果,以及获得姑息治疗的多层次障碍,生命的终结,和丧亲关怀。需要高质量的证据来告知干预措施以解决这些不平等现象,并为包容性做法和政策提供信息。尽管全球倡议提高同行评审期刊文章的可用性,少数研究是开放获取(OA)。我们的目标是评估与LGBTQ+包容性姑息治疗相关的文献的可及性,生命的终结,和丧亲关怀。
    方法:快速回顾关于LGBTQ+包容性姑息治疗的证据,生命的终结,并进行丧亲护理;评估已确定物品的OA状态.纳入了三篇已发表的系统综述(2012年、2016年、2020年)的文章。使用原始搜索和纳入/排除策略更新评论文章。
    结果:66篇与LGBTQ包容性姑息治疗有关的文章,在1990-2022年之间确定了临终和丧亲护理。其中,只有21%(n=14)为OA。在OA文章中,79%在2017-2022年间出版,50%在2020-2022年间出版,反映了最近向OA出版的转变。
    结论:卫生和社会护理专业人员和政策制定者依靠获得高质量的证据来告知他们的工作。未能发表与LGBTQ+人群和人口需求相关的文章可能会进一步边缘化,并加剧不平等现象。需要创新的期刊政策和资金来实现访问,特别是针对边缘化社区需求的研究。如果文章目前在收费墙后面,有必要提供可访问的摘要或政策简介,以告知包容性政策和实践。
    BACKGROUND: LGBTQ+ people experience higher burdens of life-limiting illnesses, poorer health outcomes, and multi-level barriers to accessing palliative, end-of-life, and bereavement care. High quality evidence is needed to inform interventions to address these inequities, and inform inclusive practices and policies. Despite global initiatives to improve availability of peer-reviewed journal articles, the minority of research is open access (OA). We aimed to evaluate accessibility of literature related to LGBTQ+ inclusive palliative, end-of-life, and bereavement care.
    METHODS: A rapid review of the evidence regarding LGBTQ+ inclusive palliative, end-of-life, and bereavement care was conducted; OA status of identified articles was assessed. Articles from three published systematic reviews were included (2012, 2016, 2020). Review articles were updated using the original search and inclusion/exclusion strategies.
    RESULTS: 66 articles related to LGBTQ+ inclusive palliative, end-of-life and bereavement care were identified between 1990-2022. Of these, only 21% (n=14) were OA. Of the OA articles, 79% were published between 2017-2022, and 50% were published between 2020-2022, reflecting more recent shifts towards OA publishing.
    CONCLUSIONS: Health and social care professionals and policy makers rely on access to high quality evidence to inform their work. Failing to make articles related to the needs of LGBTQ+ people and populations open access risks further marginalisation and worsened inequities. Innovative journal policies and funding are needed to enable access, particularly for research that foregrounds the needs of marginalised communities. Where articles are currently behind paywalls, there is a need for accessible summaries or policy briefs to inform inclusive policy and practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多地建立区域临终关怀和姑息治疗网络(RHPCN),以改善患有生命限制疾病的患者的综合护理。这项范围审查旨在识别和综合有关RHPCNs的国际文献,专注于结构,结果,好处,成功因素和良好做法。
    方法:遵循Arksey和O\'Malley\(2005)的框架,搜索四个电子数据库(CINAHL,谷歌学者,PubMed,WebofScience核心合集)于2023年7月7日进行。此外,我们对已确定文章的参考列表进行了手动搜索.原创研究,纳入了结构层面RHPCN的资格论文和描述性报告。
    结果:两名研究人员分析了777篇文章摘要,筛选全文104篇,精选文章24篇。纳入的研究主要使用定性设计。RHPCNs自我认定为当地利益相关者,雇用协调办公室和指导委员会,积极招募网络合作伙伴。成果包括改进的专业实践,提高护理质量,提高了患者对区域护理服务的利用率,并改善了患者在护理提供者之间的过渡。成功因素包括明确的协调,透明的沟通,战略规划和资源保障战略。
    结论:分析确定了关键的RHPCN成功因素,例如有效的沟通和适应性领导。尽管需要进一步的研究,研究结果强调了RHPCNs在改善姑息治疗和鼓励政策制定者支持方面的潜力。
    此范围审查是HOPAN研究项目的一部分,旨在评估和分析德国的RHPCN。该项目由联邦联合委员会(G-BA)的德国创新基金资助(GrantN°01VSF22042;资助期:01/2023-12/2024)。
    BACKGROUND: Regional hospice and palliative care networks (RHPCNs) are increasingly being established to improve integrative care for patients with life-limiting illnesses. This scoping review aimed at identifying and synthesising international literature on RHPCNs, focusing on structures, outcomes, benefits, success factors and good practices.
    METHODS: Following Arksey and O\'Malley\'s (2005) framework, a search of four electronic databases (CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection) was conducted on 7 July 2023. Additionally, a manual search of reference lists of the identified articles was performed. Original research, qualification theses and descriptive reports on RHPCNs at a structural level were included.
    RESULTS: Two researchers analysed 777 article abstracts, screened 104 full texts and selected 24 articles. The included studies predominantly used qualitative designs. RHPCNs self-identify as local stakeholders, employ coordination offices and steering committees, and actively recruit network partners. Outcomes included improved professional practices, enhanced quality of care, increased patient utilisation of regional care offerings and improved patient transitions between care providers. Success factors included clear coordination, transparent communication, strategic planning and resource-securing strategies.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analysis identified key RHPCN success factors such as effective communication and adaptive leadership. Despite the need for further research, the findings emphasise RHPCNs\' potential to improve palliative care and encourage policymaker support.
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review is part of the research project HOPAN, which aims at assessing and analysing RHPCNs in Germany. The project is funded by the German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) (Grant N° 01VSF22042; funding period: 01/2023-12/2024).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在调查韩国晚期癌症患者临终关怀(EoL)的趋势,并确定影响此类护理的因素,分析2012年至2018年的全国数据。
    方法:这是基于人群的,全国回顾性研究。我们使用国家健康保险局和韩国中央癌症登记处的行政数据,分析了2012年至2018年间在IV期癌症诊断后一年内死亡的125,350名20岁及以上的患者。
    结果:EoL护理的总体积极性在2012年至2018年之间有所下降。在病人生命的最后一个月,化疗使用(37.1%至32.3%;p<0.05),心肺复苏(13.2%至10.4%;p<0.05),在研究期间,重症监护病房的入院率(15.2%至11.1%;p<0.05)下降,尽管急诊室就诊次数没有显著趋势。在生命的最后一个月中,住院临终关怀的使用急剧增加(8.6%至26.6%;p<0.05),而临终关怀入院在死亡前3天内呈下降趋势(13.9%~11%;p<0.05).如果患者更年轻,他们更有可能接受积极的EoL护理,女人,在三级医院接受治疗,或者有恶性血液病.在亚组分析中,所有5种主要癌症类型的积极EoL治疗的总体趋势下降.
    结论:在韩国,2012-2018年期间,IV期癌症患者的EoL治疗的积极性总体下降。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the trends of aggressive care at the end-of-life (EoL) for patients with advanced cancer in Korea and to identify factors affecting such care analyzing nationwide data between 2012 to 2018.
    METHODS: This was a population-based, retrospective nationwide study. We used administrative data from the National Health Insurance Service and the Korea Central Cancer Registry to analyze 125,350 patients aged 20 years and above who died within one year of a stage IV cancer diagnosis between 2012 and 2018.
    RESULTS: The overall aggressiveness of EoL care decreased between 2012 and 2018. In patients\' last month of life, chemotherapy use (37.1% to 32.3%; p < 0.05), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (13.2% to 10.4%; p < 0.05), and intensive care unit admission (15.2% to 11.1%; p < 0.05) decreased during the study period, although no significant trend was noted in the number of emergency room visits. A steep increase was seen in inpatient hospice use in the last month of life (8.6% to 26.6%; p < 0.05), while downward trends were observed for hospice admission within three days prior to death (13.9% to 11%; p < 0.05). Patients were more likely to receive aggressive EoL care if they were younger, women, had treatment in tertiary hospitals, or had hematologic malignancies. In the subgroup analysis, the overall trend of aggressive EoL care decreased for all five major cancer types.
    CONCLUSIONS: The aggressiveness of EoL care in stage IV cancer patients showed an overall decrease during 2012-2018 in Korea.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:姑息治疗的提供应该由高质量的研究证据驱动。然而,进行研究存在障碍。大多数研究注意力集中在潜在的患者障碍;影响研究参与的人员和组织问题没有得到充分的探索。这项研究的目的是了解专业和组织的促进者以及进行姑息治疗研究的障碍。
    方法:混合方法研究,使用公开的横断面在线调查,其次是使用名义分组技术的工作组。参与者是对姑息治疗研究感兴趣的专业人士,作为通才/专科姑息治疗提供者,或英格兰西北部地区的姑息治疗研究人员。招募是通过当地的卫生组织进行的,个人网络,以及2022年的社交媒体。使用描述性统计和内容分析对数据进行检查。
    结果:参与者(调查n=293,工作组n=20)主要来自临床机构(71%),其中45%的护士和45%的姑息治疗工作超过10年。75%的人在研究中不活跃,但73%的人表示希望增加研究参与。主要障碍包括缺乏组织研究文化和能力(包括优先级和可用时间);研究知识(包括技能/专业知识和资金机会);研究基础设施(包括跨多个组织和治理挑战的合作机会);以及患者和公众对研究的看法(包括漏洞和负担)。主要促进者包括专门的研究人员,和活跃的研究小组,合作,和网络机会。
    结论:从事姑息治疗的专业人士热衷于研究,但缺乏时间,技能,并支持建立研究能力和合作。需要组织文化的转变,以增强姑息治疗研究能力和临床和研究环境中的合作机会。
    BACKGROUND: Palliative care provision should be driven by high quality research evidence. However, there are barriers to conducting research. Most research attention focuses on potential patient barriers; staff and organisational issues that affect research involvement are underexplored. The aim of this research is to understand professional and organisational facilitators and barriers to conducting palliative care research.
    METHODS: A mixed methods study, using an open cross-sectional online survey, followed by working groups using nominal group techniques. Participants were professionals interested in palliative care research, working as generalist/specialist palliative care providers, or palliative care research staff across areas of North West England. Recruitment was via local health organisations, personal networks, and social media in 2022. Data were examined using descriptive statistics and content analysis.
    RESULTS: Participants (survey n = 293, working groups n = 20) were mainly from clinical settings (71%) with 45% nurses and 45% working more than 10 years in palliative care. 75% were not active in research but 73% indicated a desire to increase research involvement. Key barriers included lack of organisational research culture and capacity (including prioritisation and available time); research knowledge (including skills/expertise and funding opportunities); research infrastructure (including collaborative opportunities across multiple organisations and governance challenges); and patient and public perceptions of research (including vulnerabilities and burdens). Key facilitators included dedicated research staff, and active research groups, collaborations, and networking opportunities.
    CONCLUSIONS: Professionals working in palliative care are keen to be research active, but lack time, skills, and support to build research capabilities and collaborations. A shift in organisational culture is needed to enhance palliative care research capacity and collaborative opportunities across clinical and research settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是回顾性分析音乐疗法对终末期癌症患者临终关怀的影响。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究包括2021年1月至2023年12月的195例终末期癌症患者。常规组包括接受常规临终关怀的患者,而组合组包括接受常规临终关怀和音乐疗法的患者.免疫指标,焦虑和抑郁评分,生活质量分数,比较两组患者管理前后的睡眠质量评分。
    结果:在管理之前,免疫指标无显著差异,焦虑和抑郁评分,生活质量分数,两组睡眠质量评分比较(P>0.05)。然而,在管理之后,联合组淋巴细胞CD3+、CD4+免疫指标明显高于常规组(P<0.05);联合组焦虑抑郁情绪和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数评分均低于常规组(P<0.05)。最后,世界卫生组织生活质量简报版得分在组合组中的所有领域均明显高于常规组;此外,身体素质下降的程度,心理,联合组社会关系领域得分小于常规组(P<0.05)。
    结论:对于终末期癌症患者,音乐疗法可以改善他们的免疫状态,生活质量,和睡眠和改善他们的焦虑和抑郁。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the effect of music therapy on patients with end-stage cancer in hospice care.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 195 patients with end-stage cancer from January 2021 to December 2023. The conventional group comprised patients who received routine hospice care, whereas the combination group comprised those who received routine hospice care and music therapy. The immune indicators, anxiety and depression scores, quality of life scores, and sleep quality scores of both groups were compared before and after management.
    RESULTS: Before management, no significant differences were observed in the immune indicators, anxiety and depression scores, quality of life scores, and sleep quality scores between both groups (P > 0.05). However, after management, the immune indicators lymphocytes CD3+ and CD4+ were significantly higher in the combination group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05); in contrast, anxiety and depression and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index scores were lower in the combination group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Lastly, the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version scores were significantly higher in all domains in the combination group than in those in the conventional group; furthermore, the degree of decline in the physical, psychological, and social relationship domain scores was smaller in the combination group than in the conventional group (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: For patients with end-stage cancer, music therapy can improve their immune status, quality of life, and sleep and ameliorate their anxiety and depression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在急性/复杂姑息治疗期间受益于专科干预的患者,一旦这种需求得到控制,通常会从专科护理过渡到初级护理。服务之间的有效沟通是协调护理的核心,以避免未满足的需求的潜在后果,支离破碎的护理,和可怜的病人和家庭经验。出院通信是护理过渡的关键组成部分。然而,对那些主要接收这些通信的人的经历知之甚少,包括病人,护理人员和初级保健医疗保健专业人员。这项研究旨在更好地了解患者如何从专科姑息治疗服务到初级保健的出院沟通,看护者,和医疗保健专业人士,以及如何改善这些沟通以支持有效的以患者为中心的护理。
    方法:这是一项为期15个月的定性研究。我们将采访30名成年患者和护理人员以及15名医疗保健专业人员(n=45)。我们将通过使用最大变化方法进行采样来寻求一系列放电通信的经验,包括从4-6个专科姑息治疗服务(医院和收容所)以及5-7个一般做法中有目的地招募来自一系列人口背景的人。面试数据将使用反身性专题方法进行分析,并将涉及研究和咨询团队的投入。与临床医生合作,专员,和PPI代表,我们将共同制定一份建议清单,供专科姑息治疗的出院沟通。
    结论:数据收集可能受到对参与者的健康需求敏感的限制。研究结果将通过学术出版物和演讲分享。我们将起草有关专业姑息治疗临床医生如何最好地与患者沟通出院的原则,看护者,和初级保健临床医生。这些将与临床医生分享,政策制定者,专员,和PPI代表以及主要利益相关者和组织(例如英国临终关怀医院)和社交媒体。主要产出将是对专科姑息治疗出院形式的建议。
    背景:于29.12.2023在ISRCTN注册中心注册,参考:ISRCTN18098027。
    BACKGROUND: Patients who have benefited from specialist intervention during periods of acute/complex palliative care needs often transition from specialist-to-primary care once such needs have been controlled. Effective communication between services is central to co-ordination of care to avoid the potential consequences of unmet needs, fragmented care, and poor patient and family experience. Discharge communications are a key component of care transitions. However, little is known about the experiences of those primarily receiving these communications, to include patients\', carers\' and primary care healthcare professionals. This study aims to have a better understanding of how the discharge communications from specialist palliative care services to primary care are experienced by patients, carers, and healthcare professionals, and how these communications might be improved to support effective patient-centred care.
    METHODS: This is a 15-month qualitative study. We will interview 30 adult patients and carers and 15 healthcare professionals (n = 45). We will seek a range of experiences of discharge communication by using a maximum variation approach to sampling, including purposively recruiting people from a range of demographic backgrounds from 4-6 specialist palliative care services (hospitals and hospices) as well as 5-7 general practices. Interview data will be analysed using a reflexive thematic approach and will involve input from the research and advisory team. Working with clinicians, commissioners, and PPI representatives we will co-produce a list of recommendations for discharge communication from specialist palliative care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Data collection may be limited by the need to be sensitive to participants\' wellbeing needs. Study findings will be shared through academic publications and presentations. We will draft principles for how specialist palliative care clinicians can best communicate discharge with patients, carers, and primary care clinicians. These will be shared with clinicians, policy makers, commissioners, and PPI representatives and key stakeholders and organisations (e.g. Hospice UK) and on social media. Key outputs will be recommendations for a specialist palliative care discharge proforma.
    BACKGROUND: Registered in ISRCTN Registry on 29.12.2023 ref: ISRCTN18098027.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非正式照顾者在临终关怀患者的生命结束时帮助他们。人们对他们在提供护理方面的准备和信心知之甚少,以及这与临终关怀的经历有什么关系。
    目的:检查与非正式护理人员家庭临终关怀评级相关的因素。
    方法:数据来自2022年1月至2023年12月从一个非营利性临终关怀组织寄出的828项完成的CAHPS®调查。多变量逻辑回归分析了临终关怀护理各个方面对临终关怀评级的独立影响。
    结果:每10名受访者中就有9人将临终关怀护理评价高(9或10)。临终关怀的大多数方面都得到了好评。几乎所有受访者都认为患者得到了尊严和尊重(96%)。改进空间最大的措施是在需要时尽快获得帮助(82%“总是”)。多变量分析揭示了6个独立预测临终关怀总体评级的因素。最强的预测指标总是在需要时尽快得到帮助,然后相信临终关怀团队关心病人.护理人员培训的三项措施与接受培训的临终关怀护理的较高评级显着相关:安全地移动患者,如果病人变得焦躁不安该怎么办,和止痛药。
    结论:当非正式护理人员感到接受过评估和管理症状的培训时,他们对临终关怀的评价更高。对于改善临终关怀护理,必须更加重视非正式的护理人员培训和支持。
    BACKGROUND: Informal caregivers aid hospice patients at the end of life. Little is known of their preparation and confidence in providing care, and how this relates to experiences of hospice care.
    OBJECTIVE: Examine factors associated with informal caregivers\' rating of home hospice care.
    METHODS: Data come from 828 completed CAHPS® surveys mailed between January 2022 and December 2023 from a single non-profit Hospice organization. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined the independent influence of various aspects of hospice care on ratings of hospice.
    RESULTS: Nine of every 10 respondents rated hospice care high (9 or 10). Most aspects of hospice care were rated favorably. Nearly all respondents felt the patient was treated with dignity and respect (96%). The measure with the greatest room for improvement was getting help as soon as needed (82% \"always\"). Multivariate analyses revealed 6 factors that independently predicted overall rating of hospice care. The strongest predictor was always getting help as soon as needed, followed by believing the hospice team cared about the patient. Three measures of caregiver training were significantly associated with higher ratings of hospice care being trained to: safely move the patient, what to do if patient became restless, and on pain medications.
    CONCLUSIONS: When informal caregivers feel trained to assess and manage the symptoms, they rate hospice care more favorably. Greater attention to informal caregiver training and support are imperative to improving hospice care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在临终关怀期间,护理人员的生活经历是在文化和语言上不同背景的人中的生活经历吗?
    方法:解释性现象学分析方法:捕获了澳大利亚首都地区和地区的11名护理人员的生活经历,这些护理人员在临终关怀期间曾照顾过文化和语言上不同背景的人。每位护理人员都接受了单独采访,并回答了一系列半结构化的开放式问题。
    结果:使用解释现象学分析,得出三组体验主题:(I)导航文化冲击和死亡,(ii)沟通的辛勤工作和(iii)寻找与客户和自我的更深层次的联系。其中包括关键要素:护理人员努力拥抱文化多样性,但努力满足文化需求,特别是关于死亡的不可预测的时间表。护理人员依靠自己和他们的即兴创作,但经历了自责的照顾不足和意外的挑战在沟通。与治疗关系的模糊界限是显而易见的,护理人员感到孤独和情感负担,但也在他们的工作中找到归属感和快乐。
    结论:护理人员的经验对于理解在提供符合文化的临终关怀方面的障碍和挑战至关重要。护理人员在这一领域的工作中反复经历了情感负担和替代创伤。护理人员在护理的各个方面都自力更生,包括沟通和始终如一的教育,培训,资源和支持。关于护理人员及其在澳大利亚医疗保健背景下的作用的研究仍然不足。
    护理人员需要获得支持和资源,包括专业翻译人员,以提供文化上适当的临终护理。工作场所和注册护士应促进培训并向护理人员提供指导。在所有客户遇到时都需要以人为中心的方法,同时保持适当的治疗关系,包括自我和专业界限的治疗使用。
    COREQ清单。
    在这项研究中,护理人员接受了采访,了解他们在临终关怀期间照顾文化和语言不同背景的人的经历。患者没有直接参与这项研究,但他们的观点可能是通过护理人员的经验表达的。
    OBJECTIVE: What are care workers\' lived experiences caring for people of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds during end-of-life care?
    METHODS: Interpretative phenomenological analysis METHODS: The lived experiences of 11 care workers within the Australian Capital Territory and region who have cared for someone of a culturally and linguistically diverse background during end-of-life care were captured. Each care worker was interviewed individually and answered a series of semi-structured open-ended questions.
    RESULTS: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis, three group experiential themes were derived: (i) navigating cultural shock and death, (ii) the hard work of communication and (iii) searching for deeper connections with client and self. Within these were key elements: Care workers worked hard to embrace cultural diversity, but struggled to meet cultural needs, particularly in relation to the unpredictable timeline of dying. Care workers relied on themselves and their improvisation, but experienced self-blame for inadequate care and unexpected challenges in communication. Blurred boundaries in relation to therapeutic relationships were apparent, and care workers felt alone with emotional burden, but also found belonging and joy in their work.
    CONCLUSIONS: Care workers\' experiences are vital to understanding the barriers and challenges in providing culturally appropriate end-of-life care. Care workers repeatedly experienced an emotional burden and vicarious trauma throughout their work in this field. Care workers were self-reliant in all aspects of care including communication and consistently desired education, training, resources and support. There remains inadequate research on care workers and their role within the Australian healthcare context.
    UNASSIGNED: Care workers need access to support and resources including professional translators to provide culturally appropriate end-of-life care. Workplaces and registered nurses should facilitate training and provide guidance to care workers. A person-centred approach is required during all client encounters while maintaining appropriate therapeutic relationships including therapeutic use of self and professional boundaries.
    UNASSIGNED: COREQ Checklist.
    UNASSIGNED: During this study, care workers were interviewed on their experiences caring for people of culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds during end-of-life care. Patients were not directly involved within this study, but their views may have been expressed through the care workers\' experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号