• 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多地建立区域临终关怀和姑息治疗网络(RHPCN),以改善患有生命限制疾病的患者的综合护理。这项范围审查旨在识别和综合有关RHPCNs的国际文献,专注于结构,结果,好处,成功因素和良好做法。
    方法:遵循Arksey和O\'Malley\(2005)的框架,搜索四个电子数据库(CINAHL,谷歌学者,PubMed,WebofScience核心合集)于2023年7月7日进行。此外,我们对已确定文章的参考列表进行了手动搜索.原创研究,纳入了结构层面RHPCN的资格论文和描述性报告。
    结果:两名研究人员分析了777篇文章摘要,筛选全文104篇,精选文章24篇。纳入的研究主要使用定性设计。RHPCNs自我认定为当地利益相关者,雇用协调办公室和指导委员会,积极招募网络合作伙伴。成果包括改进的专业实践,提高护理质量,提高了患者对区域护理服务的利用率,并改善了患者在护理提供者之间的过渡。成功因素包括明确的协调,透明的沟通,战略规划和资源保障战略。
    结论:分析确定了关键的RHPCN成功因素,例如有效的沟通和适应性领导。尽管需要进一步的研究,研究结果强调了RHPCNs在改善姑息治疗和鼓励政策制定者支持方面的潜力。
    此范围审查是HOPAN研究项目的一部分,旨在评估和分析德国的RHPCN。该项目由联邦联合委员会(G-BA)的德国创新基金资助(GrantN°01VSF22042;资助期:01/2023-12/2024)。
    BACKGROUND: Regional hospice and palliative care networks (RHPCNs) are increasingly being established to improve integrative care for patients with life-limiting illnesses. This scoping review aimed at identifying and synthesising international literature on RHPCNs, focusing on structures, outcomes, benefits, success factors and good practices.
    METHODS: Following Arksey and O\'Malley\'s (2005) framework, a search of four electronic databases (CINAHL, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection) was conducted on 7 July 2023. Additionally, a manual search of reference lists of the identified articles was performed. Original research, qualification theses and descriptive reports on RHPCNs at a structural level were included.
    RESULTS: Two researchers analysed 777 article abstracts, screened 104 full texts and selected 24 articles. The included studies predominantly used qualitative designs. RHPCNs self-identify as local stakeholders, employ coordination offices and steering committees, and actively recruit network partners. Outcomes included improved professional practices, enhanced quality of care, increased patient utilisation of regional care offerings and improved patient transitions between care providers. Success factors included clear coordination, transparent communication, strategic planning and resource-securing strategies.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analysis identified key RHPCN success factors such as effective communication and adaptive leadership. Despite the need for further research, the findings emphasise RHPCNs\' potential to improve palliative care and encourage policymaker support.
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review is part of the research project HOPAN, which aims at assessing and analysing RHPCNs in Germany. The project is funded by the German Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) (Grant N° 01VSF22042; funding period: 01/2023-12/2024).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    便秘是一种令人痛苦的症状,在接受临终关怀和姑息治疗服务的患者中患病率很高,特别是在使用阿片类药物的情况下。彻底的评估,根本原因分析,监测,和预防方法对于症状管理和生活质量至关重要。这项快速评估评估了2018年至2023年之间发表的研究,以确定医疗保健专业人员实施的预防和/或减轻这种令人痛苦的症状的策略。我们确定了12篇文章,这些文章涉及姑息治疗和临终治疗中的便秘,并报道了对多因素管理方法的需求,重点是以患者为中心的护理,包括护理人员。床边护士在评估中起着关键作用,识别,和管理便秘。与跨学科团队的适当文档和沟通有助于指导早期干预和对便秘问题的持续认识。需要对特定工具和增强指南进行更多研究,以确保经常解决和先发制人地管理便秘。
    Constipation is a distressing symptom that has a high prevalence in patients receiving hospice and palliative care services, particularly in cases of opioid use. A thorough assessment, root cause analysis, monitoring, and prophylactic approach are essential for symptom management and quality of life. This rapid review assessed studies published between 2018 and 2023 to identify strategies implemented by health care professionals to prevent and/or mitigate this distressing symptom. We identified 12 articles that addressed constipation in palliative and end-of-life settings and reported on the need for multifactorial management approaches with a focus on patient-centered care that includes the caregiver(s). Bedside nurses play a key role in assessing, identifying, and managing constipation. Proper documentation and communication with the interdisciplinary team help direct earlier intervention and ongoing awareness of constipation issues. Additional research is needed on specific tools and enhanced guidelines to ensure constipation is frequently addressed and preemptively managed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老龄化的监狱人口具有复杂的健康需求,加上惩罚性的量刑做法,这意味着对被监禁者的姑息治疗越来越重要。然而,关于高收入国家护理模式的证据有限,以及它们相关的挑战和好处。
    为了开发一种针对被监禁者的姑息治疗提供模式的类型学,综合其结果的证据,并描述在监狱中提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的不同模式的促进者和挑战。
    Arksey和O\'Malley之后的范围审查,叙事综合。该方案进行了前瞻性注册(reviewregistry1260)。
    MEDLINE,EMBASE,CINAHL,PsycINFO,2023年3月15日检索了社会科学引文索引和灰色文献。采用混合方法评价工具(MMAT)进行质量评价。
    共筛选了16,865条记录;22篇同行评审文章和18篇灰色文献来源符合纳入标准。确定了三个模型:嵌入式临终关怀,外包护理和社区合作。嵌入式临终关怀模型显示了对患者和监狱的潜在好处。外包护理可能会错过全面护理的机会。协作护理依赖于积极的监狱与社区关系,这种关系可以正式化以改善。在监狱中死亡的人及其照料者的心理社会和丧亲需求缺乏足够的文件。
    需要进一步的研究来评估监狱临终关怀的成本,并检查监狱临终关怀如何影响富有同情心的释放使用。超越美国,政策可能会使护理途径正式化,并认识到最佳做法。需要进一步调查,以解决监狱中患有限制生命的疾病和死后丧亲支持的人的社会心理需求。
    UNASSIGNED: An ageing prison population with complex health needs combined with punitive sentencing practices means palliative care for incarcerated individuals is increasingly important. However, there is limited evidence regarding the models of care delivery in high-income countries, and their associated challenges and benefits.
    UNASSIGNED: To develop a typology of models of palliative care provision for incarcerated individuals, synthesise evidence of their outcomes and describe facilitators of and challenges in delivering different models of palliative and end-of-life care in prisons.
    UNASSIGNED: Scoping review following Arksey and O\'Malley, with narrative synthesis. The protocol was registered prospectively (reviewregistry1260).
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Social Sciences Citation Index and grey literature were searched on 15th March 2023. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used for quality appraisal.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 16,865 records were screened; 22 peer-reviewed articles and 18 grey literature sources met the inclusion criteria. Three models were identified: Embedded Hospice, Outsourcing Care and Community Collaboration. The Embedded Hospice model shows potential benefits for patients and prisons. Outsourcing Care may miss opportunities for comprehensive care. Collaborative Care relies on proactive prison-community relationships that could be formalised for improvement. Psychosocial and bereavement needs of those dying in prison and their caregivers lack sufficient documentation.
    UNASSIGNED: Further research is needed to evaluate prison hospice costs and examine how prison hospices impact compassionate release usage. Beyond the USA, policies might formalise care pathways and recognise best practices. Further investigation to address psychosocial needs of people in prison with life-limiting illnesses and post-death bereavement support is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临终关怀患者的行为健康(BH)合并症普遍存在,并影响重要的结局,包括症状负担,生活质量,和照顾者的福祉。然而,针对临终关怀环境量身定制的基于证据的BH干预措施仍未得到充分研究。
    方法:我们进行了一项范围审查,目的是对临终关怀环境中BH合并症的干预措施进行研究。我们纳入了临终关怀患者对BH结局干预的实证研究。我们抽象了研究设计的数据,干预类型,和患者特征。
    结果:我们的搜索产生了7,672个独特的结果,其中37人最终被纳入我们的分析。研究代表16个地区,英国(n=13)最具代表性。最常见的干预类型是补充和替代干预(n=13),其次是心理治疗干预(n=12)。大多数研究都是试点或可行性研究。15项研究采用随机对照试验设计。BH结果最常用的测量工具包括医院焦虑和抑郁量表和埃德蒙顿症状评估量表。17项研究表明,在BH结果测量中具有统计学意义。作为干预工作重点的临终关怀患者中普遍存在的BH状况包括抑郁症状,焦虑症状,和一般的心理困扰。没有研究集中在创伤相关疾病或物质使用障碍。
    结论:这项范围审查揭示了关于临终关怀环境中基于证据的BH干预措施的研究中的一个令人担忧的差距,特别是在美国,尽管临终关怀服务得到了广泛利用,而且临终关怀患者中BH疾病的患病率很高,以改善BH结局为重点的随机对照试验仍然很少.BH目前的做法,比如苯二氮卓类药物和抗精神病药的广泛使用,可能不是基于强有力的证据,强调迫切需要投资于临终关怀研究基础设施和量身定制的临床试验,以测试行为方法,以减轻生命结束时的心理健康结果。
    BACKGROUND: Behavioral health (BH) comorbidities in hospice patients are widespread and impact important outcomes, including symptom burden, quality of life, and caregiver wellbeing. However, evidence-based BH interventions tailored for the hospice setting remain understudied.
    METHODS: We conducted a scoping review with the objective of mapping studies of interventions for BH comorbidities in the hospice setting. We included empirical studies among hospice patients of interventions with BH outcomes. We abstracted data on study design, intervention type, and patient characteristics.
    RESULTS: Our search generated 7,672 unique results, of which 37 were ultimately included in our analysis. Studies represented 16 regions, with the United Kingdom (n=13) most represented. The most frequent intervention type was complementary and alternative interventions (n=13), followed by psychotherapeutic interventions (n=12). Most of the studies were either pilot or feasibility investigations. Fifteen studies employed a randomized controlled trial design. The most frequently utilized measurement tools for BH outcomes included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. Seventeen studies demonstrated statistically significant results in a BH outcome measure. BH conditions prevalent among hospice patients that were the focus of intervention efforts included depression symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and general psychological distress. No study focused on trauma-related disorders or substance use disorders.
    CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review reveals a concerning gap in research regarding evidence-based BH interventions in hospice settings, especially in the U.S. Despite extensive utilization of hospice care services and the high prevalence of BH conditions among hospice patients, randomized controlled trials focused on improving BH outcomes remain scant. The current BH practices, like the widespread use of benzodiazepines and antipsychotics, may not be rooted in robust evidence, underscoring an urgent need for investment in hospice research infrastructure and tailored clinical trials to test behavioral approaches to mitigate mental health outcomes at the end of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:由于许多患者在重症监护病房度过了最后的日子,他们必须得到适当的临终护理。然而,文化差异,在生命终结期间,重症监护环境中可能会出现道德困境和偏好实践。重症监护中临终患者的限制治疗是一个没有法律定义的新概念,因此在解释“无复苏”和“舒适护理”这两个术语时可能会出现混淆。因此,研究的问题是“什么帮助或阻碍了中东国家成人重症监护病房中有效的临终关怀?”
    方法:作者使用五个电子数据库进行了全面的系统文献综述。我们确定了Medline的主要研究,Embase,CINAHL,Psycinfo和Scopus。该团队使用JoannaBriggs研究所检查表(JBI)评估了审查中包含的全文论文的质量。我们在2022年4月1日完成了文献检索,并且不限于特定时期。
    结果:我们确定并纳入了9项相关研究。我们确定了五个主要主题作为临终护理挑战和/或促进者:组织结构和管理,(错误)对临终护理的理解,临终的灵性和宗教实践,关于临终关怀的沟通,以及ICU环境的影响。
    结论:本综述报告了在ICU中提供临终关怀的挑战和促进因素,并提出了改进实践的初步建议。这些当然不是中东独有的,但可以在整个国际文献中找到。然而,中东和北非国家的文化背景给这些地区的实践带来了特殊的挑战和机遇。建议进一步的观察性研究来确认或修改本综述的结果,并制定和评估综合干预措施,以促进中东ICU的临终护理。
    BACKGROUND: As many patients are spending their last days in critical care units, it is essential that they receive appropriate end-of -life care. However, cultural differences, ethical dilemmas and preference practices can arise in the intensive care settings during the end of life. Limiting therapy for dying patients in intensive care is a new concept with no legal definition and therefore there may be confusion in interpreting the terms \'no resuscitation\' and \'comfort care\' among physicians in Middle East. Therefore, the research question is \'What helps or hinders effective end-of-life care in adult intensive care units in Middle Eastern countries?\'
    METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic literature review using five electronic databases. We identified primary studies from Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Psycinfo and Scopus. The team assessed the full-text papers included in the review for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist (JBI). We completed the literature search on the first of April 2022 and was not limited to a specific period.
    RESULTS: We identified and included nine relevant studies in the review. We identified five main themes as end-of-life care challenges and/or facilitators: organisational structure and management, (mis)understanding of end-of-life care, spirituality and religious practices for the dying, communication about end-of-life care, and the impact of the ICU environment.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review has reported challenges and facilitators to providing end-of-life care in ICU and made initial recommendations for improving practice. These are certainly not unique to the Middle East but can be found throughout the international literature. However, the cultural context of Middle East and North Africa countries gives these areas of practice special challenges and opportunities. Further observational research is recommended to confirm or modify the results of this review, and with a view to developing and evaluating comprehensive interventions to promote end-of-life care in ICUs in the Middle East.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Nurses play a unique and critical role in palliative care, and it is noteworthy that nurses often encounter ethical dilemmas in this field.
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to conduct a summarised synthesis of the latest research on the ethical considerations nurses faced in palliative care.
    METHODS: We conducted a rigorous systematic review of relevant existing studies published in high-quality English peer-reviewed journals from January 2017 to July 2023. We identified a total of 4492 articles (1029 in Web of Science, 1570 in PubMed and 1893 in Science Direct). Out of these, only 13 studies met the inclusion criteria.
    RESULTS: Following the thematic analysis, the ethical considerations reported in these 13 studies were grouped into three main themes and four subthemes: ethical issues in communication (ethical issues in communication with patients, ethical issues in communication with families), ethical issues in decision-making (autonomy, dignity) and moral distress in palliative care.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study elaborated on the ethical challenges faced by nurses in their communication with patients and families as well as decision-making and analysed the causes and effects of ethical distress, hoping to give a hand to ethical issues for nurses\' work in palliative care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    家是大多数人首选的死亡之地。护士在支持临终家庭护理方面发挥着关键作用,然而,人们对决定家作为死亡地点的因素知之甚少。本范围审查描述了实际死亡地点的百分比,并确定了与家庭相关的社会因素,作为终末期慢性健康状况的非癌症患者的死亡地点。纳入标准包括(1)非癌症慢性病,(2)死亡地点的结果,和(3)决定家作为死亡地点的因素。证据来源包括PubMed,CINAHL,和WebofScience数据库,2022年5月进行了搜索,2022年5月至2023年11月进行了额外搜索。使用JBI范围审查指南(2020)和系统审查和Meta分析的首选报告项目范围审查扩展。该分析包括28项研究。百分比的范围在样品中相同的死亡地点内变化。确定了将房屋确定为死亡地点的两个主要结构:先前因素和社会资本。结果表明,应继续了解患有晚期慢性健康状况的非癌症患者的死亡地点。两种结构将家庭确定为死亡地点,并被认为是在启动姑息治疗服务以促进家庭死亡和实现临终护理目标时增加平等可及性的基础。
    A home is a preferred place of death by most people. Nurses play a key role in supporting end-of-life home care, yet less is known about the factors that determine home as a place of death. This scoping review describes the percentage of actual places of death and determines social factors related to home as the place of death among noncancer patients with end-stage chronic health conditions. Inclusion criteria included (1) noncancer chronic illness conditions, (2) outcomes of place of death, and (3) factors that determine home as a place of death. Sources of evidence included PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases, which were searched in May 2022, and additional searches from May 2022 to November 2023.The JBI scoping review guide (2020) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review extension were used. Twenty-eight studies were included in this analysis. The range of percentages is varied within the same place of death among the sample. Two major constructs that determine a home as a place of death were identified: preceding factors and social capital. The results suggest that the place of death among noncancer patients with end-stage chronic health conditions should be continued to be understood. Two constructs determined home as a place of death and are considered as a fundamental to increasing equal accessibility in the initiation of palliative care services to promote home death and meet end-of-life care goals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:在美国(美国),近三分之一的熟练家庭保健(HH)患者和近一半的临终关怀患者诊断为阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD),通常以认知和功能缓慢下降为特征的疾病。许多患有痴呆症(PLWD)的人在家中得到照顾,但可能会在诸如熟练的HH或临终关怀等护理环境之间过渡。可能导致分散和较差的护理。本系统评价的目的是研究与(I)在美国参加熟练HH和临终关怀的PLWD的护理过渡有关的文献,(二)具体而言,熟练的HH和PWD临终关怀之间的护理过渡。
    方法:我们进行了系统评价。从2023年3月到11月16日,我们搜索了CINAHL,PsychInfo(EBSCO版本),和PubMed数据库输入与HH相关的关键字和索引术语,护理过渡,临终关怀,和痴呆症。如果文章经过同行评审,则包括在内,在2017-2023年间发表的主要研究研究,解决了在美国熟练HH和临终关怀中注册的PLWD的护理过渡或两种设置之间的过渡.我们评估了每篇文章的质量并提取了相关数据。我们通过设置来描述研究,同时分析它们之间的异同。
    结果:在230项研究中,14符合我们的纳入标准。我们发现PLWD早期风险较高,不成功的出院和再次入院熟练的HH;PLWD从临终关怀医院存活出院的风险较高。只有一项研究涉及熟练的HH和临终关怀之间PLWD的护理过渡。
    结论:我们只纳入了美国的研究,由于熟练的HH和临终关怀在其他国家的政策和实践可能有所不同,这限制了我们的发现。未来的工作应探索针对PLWD的评估方法,以提高护理协调的质量,从,在熟练的HH和临终关怀之间。
    BACKGROUND: In the United States (US), nearly one third of skilled home health (HH) patients and nearly one half of hospice patients have diagnoses of Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD), conditions often characterized by a slow decline in cognition and function. Many persons living with dementia (PLWDs) are cared for at home yet may transition between care settings such as skilled HH or hospice, potentially leading to fragmented and poorer care. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine literature pertaining to (I) care transitions for PLWD who are enrolled in skilled HH and hospice in the US, and (II) specifically, care transitions between skilled HH and hospice for PLWD.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review. From March to November 16, 2023, we searched CINAHL, PsychInfo (EBSCO version), and PubMed databases inputting keywords and index terms related to HH, care transition, hospice, and dementia. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed, primary research studies that were published between 2017-2023 and addressed care transitions for PLWD enrolled in US skilled HH and hospice or transitions between the two settings. We evaluated the quality of each article and extracted relevant data. We described studies by setting while analyzing for similarities and differences between them.
    RESULTS: Of 230 studies, 14 met our inclusion criteria. We found that PLWD are at higher risk for early, unsuccessful discharge from-and readmission to-skilled HH; and PLWD are at higher risk for being discharged alive from hospice. Only one study pertained to care transitions for PLWD between skilled HH and hospice.
    CONCLUSIONS: We included only studies set in the US, as skilled HH and hospice may differ in policy and practice in other countries, which limits our findings. Future work should explore assessment approaches specific to PLWD that lead to higher quality of coordination of care to, from, and between skilled HH and hospice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The demand for palliative care for terminally ill patients is rising globally. This review examines the potential of health worker education to enhance palliative care in Africa. A search of PubMed yielded 32 relevant articles published in English from 2013 to 2023 focused on African countries with WHO-categorized palliative care development and health care worker training. The findings underscore the pivotal role of health care worker education in elevating palliative care standards. Targeted initiatives equip health care workers with vital skills in pain management, symptom control, and communication. The integration of palliative care into public health systems is important for the sustainability of end-of-life care for terminally ill patients in Africa and around the world.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    目标:多年来,医疗保健中的种族和族裔差异问题一直是一个重大问题。它包括各个方面,包括疾病预防,诊断,管理,和报废(EOL)护理。研究发现,及时干预姑息治疗可以改善EOL护理并降低医疗成本。这篇综述旨在详细介绍医疗保健差异对姑息治疗的影响,临终关怀注册,以及面临EOL的严重疾病患者的EOL护理。它解决了在造成这些差异中起作用的因素,并描述了可以减少提供EOL护理方面的差异的具体干预措施。
    方法:作者搜索,PubMedCentral,Medline,和PubMed数据库使用种族差异和临终/姑息治疗组合。共确定了57项研究。所有文章都进行了审查,并综合现有证据,确定受种族差异影响的EOL护理关键领域及其影响因素.
    几个病人,提供者,机构层面的因素可能是导致EOL护理差异的原因,包括健康素养,获得护理,对医疗系统的不信任,健康的社会决定因素(SDH),医学种族主义,文化和宗教习俗,在EOL的沟通。少数族裔患者经历的EOL护理差异是医疗保健系统中系统和制度化种族主义猖ramp的延伸。供应商必须在多个方面努力解决这种不平等和不公正,首先是关于EOL护理差异的认可和对话。
    结论:沟通中的差异,姑息治疗和临终关怀的利用,症状管理必须根除。所有患有严重疾病的患者和家庭,无论其种族或族裔背景如何,都应获得姑息治疗和临终关怀。
    OBJECTIVE: The issue of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare has been a significant concern for many years. It encompasses various aspects, including disease prevention, diagnosis, management, and end-of-life (EOL) care. Research has found that timely intervention with palliative care can result in better EOL care and reduced healthcare costs. This review aims to detail the role of healthcare disparities impacting palliative care, hospice enrollment, and EOL care in patients with serious illnesses who are facing EOL. It addresses the factors that play a role in creating these disparities and describes specific interventions that may reduce disparities in the provision of EOL care.
    METHODS: Authors searched, PubMed Central, Medline, and PubMed databases using Racial Disparity and End-of-Life/Palliative Care combinations. A total of 57 studies were identified. All articles were reviewed, and the available evidence was synthesized and to identify key domains in EOL care impacted by racial disparities and the factors contributing to them.
    UNASSIGNED: Several patient, provider, and institutional level factors may be responsible for disparities seen in EOL care, including health literacy, access to care, mistrust of the healthcare system, social determinants of health (SDH), medical racism, cultural and religious customs, and communication at EOL. Disparities in EOL care experienced by minority patients is an extension of the systemic and institutionalized racism rampant in the healthcare system. Providers must work on multiple fronts to address this inequity and injustice, the first of which is recognition and conversation regarding disparities in EOL care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in communication, palliative and hospice care utilization, and symptom management must be eradicated. Palliative care and hospice should be made accessible for all patients and families experiencing severe illness regardless of their racial or ethnic background.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号