neighborhood

邻里
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管邻里质量与成人健康状况较差有关,有限的研究探索了邻里劣势之间的联系,例如,区域剥夺指数(ADI),和年长的黑人成年人的健康,前瞻性。这项观察性研究检查了ADI与老年黑人成年人纵向身体健康变化之间的关系。分析样本(n=317)包括来自巴尔的摩黑色老化研究:认知老化模式(BSBA-PCA)的第1和第2波的数据。研究变量包括面积剥夺指数(ADI),身体健康的客观(如平均心率)和主观(如日常生活活动)测量。采用多元线性回归模型控制社会人口统计学和社会支持特征。住在更弱势社区的参与者,基于国家和州的ADI,即使在调整协变量后,心率也更有可能下降。同样,根据国家和州ADI排名,报告ADL困难程度增加的参与者居住在劣势更大的社区.观察到平均心率的显着社会支持和ADI(国家和州)互动。研究结果表明,对邻里质量和社会支持的影响的研究可以增强我们对其对老年黑人健康影响的理解。
    Despite the association of neighborhood quality with poorer adult health, limited research has explored the association between neighborhood disadvantage, e.g. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and older Black adults\' health, prospectively. This observational study examined the association between ADI and changes in longitudinal physical health within older Black adults. The analytic sample (n = 317) included data from waves 1 & 2 of the Baltimore Study of Black Aging: Patterns of Cognitive Aging (BSBA-PCA). Study variables included the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), objective (e.g. average heart rate) and subjective (e.g. activities of daily living) measures of physical health. Multiple linear regression models were conducted controlling for sociodemographic and social support characteristics. Participants living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods, based on national and state ADIs, were more likely to have a decreasing heart rate even after adjusting for covariates. Likewise, participants reporting increasing levels of ADL difficulty were living in a neighborhood with greater disadvantage based on national and state ADI rankings. Significant social support received and ADI (national and state) interactions were observed for average heart rate. The findings suggest that research on the effect of neighborhood quality and social support can enhance our understanding of its impact on older Black adults\' health prospectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究表明,人们居住的社区可能是各种健康结果的风险或保护因素,包括阿尔茨海默病的认知能力下降。类似于邻里对健康结果的影响,睡眠困难与老年人的认知功能有关.然而,很少有研究研究邻居身体障碍如何缓解睡眠对主观认知能力下降(SCD)的影响.
    该研究考察了邻域因素对睡眠困难与SCD之间关系的调节作用。
    数据来自第11波国家健康和老龄化趋势(NHATS)数据中的2,494名受访者(1,065名男性和1,429名女性)。睡眠困难被操作为跌倒和保持睡眠困难的存在。邻里生理障碍(例如,故意破坏,涂鸦)是基于采访者对受访者社区的观察。SCD作为过去12个月中记忆丧失增加或恶化的主观报告和目前的记忆评分进行了操作。我们利用线性回归来测试邻域物理障碍,以调节睡眠困难与SCD之间的关系。
    我们在SCD上发现了睡眠困难与邻居身体障碍之间的显着相互作用(β=0.03,SE=0.01,95%CI[0.00,0.51],p<0.001)。报告较高的平均睡眠困难和较高水平的邻居身体障碍的参与者更有可能报告SCD。
    我们的研究结果为未来的健康干预措施和政策建议提供了信息,以解决认知能力下降和阿尔茨海默病风险的可修改来源。
    UNASSIGNED: Research suggests that the neighborhood in which people live can be a risk or protective factor for various health outcomes, including cognitive decline to Alzheimer\'s disease. Similar to the impact of neighborhood on health outcomes, sleep difficulties have been linked to cognitive function in older adults. However, few studies have examined how neighborhood physical disorders moderate the effects of sleep on subjective cognitive decline (SCD).
    UNASSIGNED: The study examined the moderating effect of neighborhood factors on the relationship between sleep difficulties and SCD.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were obtained from 2,494 respondents (1,065 males and 1,429 females) from Wave 11 of the National Health and Aging Trends (NHATS) data. Sleep difficulties were operationalized as the presence of difficulties in falling and staying asleep. Neighborhood physical disorder (e.g., vandalism, graffiti) was based on interviewer observations of respondents\' neighborhoods. SCD was operationalized as subjective reports of increasing or worse memory loss in the past 12 months and present memory rating. We utilized Linear regression to test neighborhood physical disorder as a moderator of the relationship between sleep difficulties and SCD.
    UNASSIGNED: We found a significant interaction between sleep difficulties and neighborhood physical disorder on SCD (β=0.03, SE = 0.01, 95% CI[0.00,0.51], p < 0.001). Participants who reported higher average sleep difficulties and higher levels of neighborhood physical disorder were more likely to report SCD.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings add to inform future health interventions and policy recommendations that address modifiable sources of cognitive decline and risk of Alzheimer\'s disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:邻里因素在不良儿童经历(ACEs)和体重指数(BMI)之间的关联中的作用尚未得到广泛研究。邻域ACE指数(NAI)捕获与ACE暴露相关的邻域环境因素。这项研究调查了纽约市(NYC)青年的BMI与NAI之间的关联。一项探索性目标研究了纽约市社区的NAI地理分布。方法:将2006-2017年在12年级幼儿园就读纽约市公立普通教育学校的学生的数据(n=1,753,867)与25个地理空间数据集相关联,这些数据集捕获了纽约市每个人口普查区域的邻里特征。多变量分层线性回归测试了BMI和NAI之间的关联;还对年轻人(<8岁)进行了分析,学龄(8-12岁),和青少年(>12岁)亚组。此外,NAI是由人口普查区绘制的,和当地莫兰的我确定了高和低NAI社区的集群。结果:在所有性别和年龄组中,较高的BMI与较高的NAI相关,女孩协会规模最大(中等NAIvs.低NAI:未标准化β=0.112(SE0.008),标准化β[效应大小]=0.097,p<0.001;高NAIvs.低NAI:未标准化β=0.195(SE0.008),标准化β=0.178,p<0.001)和青少年(中等NAIvs.低NAI:未标准化β=0.189(SE0.014),标准化β=0.161,p<0.001,高NAIvs.低NAI:未标准化β=0.364(SE0.015),青春期女孩的标准化β=0.334,p<0.001;中等NAIvs.低NAI:未标准化β=0.122(SE0.014),标准化β=0.095,p<0.001,高NAIvs.低NAI:未标准化β=0.217(SE0.015),青春期男孩的标准化β=0.187,p<0.001)。纽约市的每个行政区都包括NAI暴露程度较高和较低的社区集群,尽管集群的大小和地理分散模式各不相同。结论:捕获与ACE暴露相关的邻里环境因素的空间指数与纽约市年轻人的较高BMI相关。研究结果补充了先前关于邻里环境与肥胖风险之间关系的文献,现有的研究记录了ACE与肥胖的关联,以及邻里因素可能成为逆境的根源。总的来说,有证据表明,创伤知情的基于场所的减少肥胖的努力值得进一步探索,作为阻断ACE-肥胖关联的潜在手段.
    Background: The role of neighborhood factors in the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and body mass index (BMI) has not been widely studied. A neighborhood ACEs index (NAI) captures neighborhood environment factors associated with ACE exposure. This study examined associations between BMI and an NAI among New York City (NYC) youth. An exploratory objective examined the NAI geographic distribution across NYC neighborhoods. Methods: Data for students attending NYC public general education schools in kindergarten-12th grade from 2006-2017 (n = 1,753,867) were linked to 25 geospatial datasets capturing neighborhood characteristics for every census tract in NYC. Multivariable hierarchical linear regression tested associations between BMI and the NAI; analyses also were conducted by young (<8 years), school age (8-12 years), and adolescent (>12 years) subgroups. In addition, NAI was mapped by census tract, and local Moran\'s I identified clusters of high and low NAI neighborhoods. Results: Higher BMI was associated with higher NAI across all sex and age groups, with largest magnitude of associations for girls (medium NAI vs. low NAI: unstandardized β = 0.112 (SE 0.008), standardized β [effect size]=0.097, p < 0.001; high NAI vs. low NAI: unstandardized β = 0.195 (SE 0.008), standardized β = 0.178, p < 0.001) and adolescents (medium NAI vs. low NAI: unstandardized β = 0.189 (SE 0.014), standardized β = 0.161, p < 0.001, high NAI vs. low NAI: unstandardized β = 0.364 (SE 0.015), standardized β = 0.334, p < 0.001 for adolescent girls; medium NAI vs. low NAI: unstandardized β = 0.122 (SE 0.014), standardized β = 0.095, p < 0.001, high NAI vs. low NAI: unstandardized β = 0.217 (SE 0.015), standardized β = 0.187, p < 0.001 for adolescent boys). Each borough of NYC included clusters of neighborhoods with higher and lower NAI exposure, although clusters varied in size and patterns of geographic dispersion across boroughs. Conclusions: A spatial index capturing neighborhood environment factors associated with ACE exposure is associated with higher BMI among NYC youth. Findings complement prior literature about relationships between neighborhood environment and obesity risk, existing research documenting ACE-obesity associations, and the potential for neighborhood factors to be a source of adversity. Collectively, evidence suggests that trauma-informed place-based obesity reduction efforts merit further exploration as potential means to interrupt ACE-obesity associations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:创伤的诱发因素是复杂和多变的。邻里环境可能会影响损伤机制或结果。社会脆弱性指数(SVI)确定有紧急情况风险的地区;地区剥夺指数(ADI)衡量社会经济劣势。目的是评估SVI或ADI对受伤患者住院时间(LOS)和死亡率的影响,以确定SVI或ADI是否指示伤害预防可能最有效的区域。
    方法:包括2015年至2022年居住在密尔沃基县并在I级创伤中心接受损伤治疗的成年患者。对患者地址进行地理编码,并与2020年州级SVI和ADI措施合并。SVI将人口普查范围从最少到最脆弱的0-100排名。ADI将人口普查区块组从最少到最不利的排名为1-10。ADI和SVI排名转换为十分位数。统计分析包括描述性统计,卡方检验,以及LOS和住院死亡率的回归模型,针对不同型号中的SVI或ADI进行了调整,年龄,性别,种族或民族,损伤机制(MOI),损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。
    结果:纳入14542例患者;63%为男性。平均总住院LOS为6.4±9.8天,5.2%的患者发生院内死亡率。基于SVI和ADI,5,280名(36%)患者居住在高脆弱性地区,5,576名(39%)居住在高度不利地区,分别。在调整了患者因素后,SVI分位数6、9、10与医院LOS增加有关,SVI第5分位数与住院死亡率相关(OR=2.22,95CI:1.06-4.63;p=0.034)。当针对ADI进行调整时,第7-10十分位数与医院LOS增加相关.经SVI和ADI校正后,年龄和ISS增加与医院LOS和死亡率增加相关。
    结论:SVI和ADI在高脆弱性或弱势地区确定了相似比例的患者。较高的SVI和ADI十分位数与较长的医院LOS相关,仅第5分位数SVI与住院死亡率相关.高度不利或脆弱的地区可能有更长的LOS,但SVI和ADI对创伤死亡率的影响有限.需要对邻里和社区因素以及创伤后果进行持续研究。
    BACKGROUND: Predisposing factors for traumatic injuries are complex and variable. Neighborhood environments may influence injury mechanism or outcomes. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) identifies areas at risk for emergencies; Area Deprivation Index (ADI) measures socioeconomic disadvantage. The objective was to assess the impact of SVI or ADI on hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality for injured patients to determine whether SVI or ADI indicated areas where injury prevention may be most impactful.
    METHODS: Adult patients who resided in Milwaukee County and were treated for injuries from 2015 to 2022 at a level I trauma center were included. Patients\' addresses were geocoded and merged with 2020 state-level SVI and ADI measures. SVI ranks census tracts 0-100 from least to most vulnerable. ADI ranks census block groups 1-10 from least to most disadvantaged. ADI and SVI rankings were converted to deciles. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and regression models for LOS and in-hospital mortality, adjusted for either SVI or ADI within separate models, age, sex, race or ethnicity, mechanism of injury (MOI), injury severity score (ISS).
    RESULTS: 14,542 patients were included; 63 % were male. Mean total hospital LOS was 6.4 ± 9.8 days, and in-hospital mortalities occurred in 5.2 % of patients. Based on SVI and ADI, 5,280 (36 %) patients resided in high vulnerability areas and 5,576 (39 %) lived in highly disadvantaged areas, respectively. After adjusting for patient factors, SVI deciles #6, 9, 10 were associated with increased hospital LOS, and SVI decile #5 was associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 2.22, 95 %CI:1.06-4.63; p = 0.034). When adjusted for ADI, the 7th-10th deciles were associated with increased hospital LOS. Greater age and ISS were associated with increased hospital LOS and mortality when adjusted for SVI and ADI.
    CONCLUSIONS: SVI and ADI identified a similar proportion of patients in high vulnerability or disadvantaged areas. Higher SVI and ADI deciles were associated with longer hospital LOS, and only the 5th SVI decile was associated with in-hospital mortality. Highly disadvantaged or vulnerable areas may have a longer LOS, but SVI and ADI have limited influence on trauma mortality. Continued research on neighborhood and community factors and trauma outcomes is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于人群的调查表明,较低的社会经济地位(SES)与较高的抑郁症状患病率有关,而他们的医疗保健利用率不一定更高。
    目的:调查社区社会经济状况(NSES)与被诊断为重度抑郁症(MDD)的个体的医疗保健利用之间的关系。
    方法:这是一项回顾性纵向研究,对2010-2018年期间在初级保健中首次诊断为MDD的所有成年人进行了研究。NSES使用Mosaic™分类由居住的家庭区域定义。结果是AD(抗抑郁药)(N06A)分配和精神病门诊就诊,这两种方法都被列为抑郁症指南中的选项。Cox多变量回归用于事件时间分析。
    结果:共纳入117,193人,其中87,499(75%)被分配了AD和35,989(31%)的精神病门诊就诊记录。与高NSES相比,低NSES与诊断后第一年AD分配率较低(HR:0.95,95%CI:0.93-0.96,p<0.001)和精神病就诊率较高(HR:1.10,95%CI:1.07-1.12,p<0.001)相关。
    结论:数据源具有很高的覆盖率。不包括由非公共资助的提供者提供的少数精神病护理。无法调整抑郁症的严重程度。
    结论:按居住区衡量的社会经济状况与MDD中的AD分配和精神病门诊就诊有关,也在几乎免费访问的医疗保健系统中。这与临床实践有关,考虑到对护理公平性的关注和全球抑郁症患病率的增加。
    BACKGROUND: Population-based surveys suggest that low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with higher prevalence of depressive symptoms, while their healthcare utilization is not necessarily higher.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) and healthcare utilization among individuals diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD).
    METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study of all adults with a first MDD diagnosis within primary care during 2010-2018. NSES was defined by the household area of residence using the Mosaic™ classification. Outcomes were AD (antidepressants) (N06A) dispensation and psychiatric outpatient visit, both of which are outlined as options in depression guidelines. Cox multivariable regression was used for the time to event analyses.
    RESULTS: A total of 117,193 individuals were included, of which 87,499 (75 %) were dispensed an AD and 35,989 (31 %) had a recorded psychiatric outpatient visit. Low NSES was associated with lower rate of AD dispensation in the first-year post-diagnosis (HR: 0.95, 95 % CI: 0.93-0.96, p < 0.001) and higher rate of psychiatric visit (HR: 1.10, 95 % CI: 1.07-1.12, p < 0.001) compared with high NSES.
    CONCLUSIONS: Data sources have high coverage. A minority of psychiatric care provided by non-publicly financed providers was not included. It was not possible to adjust for depression severity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic status as measured by the neighborhood of residency was associated with AD dispensation and psychiatric outpatient visit in MDD, also in a healthcare system with virtually free access. This is of relevance for clinical practice, considering the focus on equity of care and the increase in depression prevalence worldwide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查种族不平等,和社会决定因素,新西兰Aotearoa的青少年睡眠健康。
    方法:分析来自中学生(12至18岁)的横断面调查的自我报告数据。分析包括按种族分层的良好和不良睡眠健康的加权患病率估计,和多变量逻辑回归模型同时针对种族进行了调整,学年,性别,rurality,邻里剥夺,学校十位数,住房剥夺,由于缺乏足够的住房而睡在其他地方,不安全的环境,种族主义。
    结果:毛利人(新西兰奥特罗阿土著人民;n=1528)和少数民族(太平洋n=1204;亚洲n=1927;中东,拉丁美洲,和非洲[MELAA]n=210;和“其他种族n=225)青少年。毛利人的比例更高,太平洋,亚洲人,MELAA,和“其他”青少年睡眠不足,与欧洲相比(n=3070)。毛利人,太平洋,亚洲人,MELAA青少年更有可能报告晚睡时间(午夜之后),还有毛利人,太平洋,和\'其他\'青少年更有可能报告早期觉醒时间(上午5-6点或更早),在学校的日子。Rurality,邻里剥夺,学校层面的剥夺,住房剥夺,由于住房不足而睡在其他地方,不安全的环境,部分种族主义,但不完全,解释了种族和睡眠不足之间的关联,晚睡时间,和早醒时间。
    结论:新西兰奥特罗阿青少年睡眠健康中存在种族不平等现象。需要采取社会政治行动来解决种族主义和殖民主义,这是青少年睡眠中种族不平等的根本原因,确保所有年轻人享有良好睡眠健康和相关身心健康的基本人权。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate ethnic inequities in, and social determinants of, adolescent sleep health in Aotearoa New Zealand.
    METHODS: Analysis of self-report data from a cross-sectional survey of secondary school students (12- to 18-year-olds). Analyses included weighted prevalence estimates of good and poor sleep health stratified by ethnicity, and multivariable logistic regression models concurrently adjusted for ethnicity, school year, gender, rurality, neighborhood deprivation, school decile, housing deprivation, sleeping elsewhere due to lack of adequate housing, unsafe environment, and racism.
    RESULTS: Inequities in social determinants of health were evident for Māori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand; n = 1528) and minoritized (Pacific n = 1204; Asian n = 1927; Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African [MELAA] n = 210; and \'Other\' ethnicity n = 225) adolescents. A greater proportion of Māori, Pacific, Asian, MELAA, and \'Other\' adolescents had short sleep, compared to European (n = 3070). Māori, Pacific, Asian, and MELAA adolescents were more likely to report late bedtimes (after midnight), and Māori, Pacific, and \'Other\' adolescents were more likely to report early waketimes (5 AM-6 AM or earlier), on school days. Rurality, neighborhood deprivation, school-level deprivation, housing deprivation, sleeping elsewhere due to inadequate housing, unsafe environments, and racism partially, but not fully, explained associations between ethnicity and short sleep, late bedtimes, and early waketimes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic inequities exist in adolescent sleep health in Aotearoa New Zealand. Socio-political actions are needed to address racism and colonialism as root causes of ethnic inequities in adolescent sleep, to ensure all young people are afforded the basic human right of good sleep health and associated mental and physical well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    综合邻里环境对空气污染与死亡率关联的影响尚不清楚。我们分析了英国生物库前瞻性研究的数据(n=421,650,中位随访12.5年),以检查不同社区环境中与空气污染相关的死亡风险差异。细颗粒物(PM2.5),测量PM10和二氧化氮(NO2),并将其分配给每个参与者的地址。社区的不同生态和社会环境与主成分分析相结合,并分类为弱势群体,中间和优势水平。我们使用Cox回归估算了不同社区与空气污染相关的死亡风险。我们计算了可归因于空气污染物的社区级死亡率比例。有证据表明,在弱势社区中,与PM2.5和NO2相关的全因和呼吸系统疾病死亡风险较高。在弱势社区,空气污染物解释了更大比例的死亡,这种差异在过去几十年中一直存在。在2010年至2021年期间,将PM2.5和NO2降低至10μg/m3(世界卫生组织限值)将为40岁以上的人口节省87,000例(52,000-120,000例)和91,000例(37,000-145,000例)死亡。在不利的社区环境中发生了150000例死亡。这些发现表明,弱势社区可能会加剧与空气污染相关的死亡风险。
    Effect modification of integrated neighborhood environment on associations of air pollution with mortality remained unclear. We analyzed data from UK biobank prospective study (n = 421,650, median 12.5 years follow-up) to examine disparities of mortality risk associated with air pollution among varied neighborhood settings. Fine particulate matter (PM2.5), PM10 and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were measured and assigned to each participants\' address. Diverse ecological and societal settings of neighborhoods were integrated with principal component analysis and categorized into disadvantaged, intermediate and advantaged levels. We estimated mortality risk associated with air pollution across diverse neighborhoods using Cox regression. We calculated community-level proportions of mortality attributable to air pollutants. There was evidence of higher all-cause and respiratory disease mortality risk associated with PM2.5 and NO2 among those in disadvantaged neighborhoods. In disadvantaged communities, air pollutants explained larger proportions of deaths and such disparities persisted over past decades. Across 2010-2021, reducing PM2.5 and NO2 to 10 μg/m3 (World Health Organization limits) would save 87,000 (52,000-120,000) and 91,000 (37,000-145,000) deaths of populations aged ≥ 40 years, with 150 000 deaths occurred in disadvantaged neighborhood settings. These findings suggested that disadvantaged neighborhoods can exacerbate mortality risk associated with air pollution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为网络安全领域的研究热点,机器学习的实现,比如联邦学习,涉及大量分布式网络设备之间的信息交互。如果我们将这些分布式网络设备和连接关系视为一个复杂的网络,我们可以识别有影响的节点,找到优化联邦学习系统中设备可靠性失衡的关键点。本文将分析现有复杂网络中影响节点识别算法的优缺点,并从信息传播的角度提出了一种基于邻域内Kullback-Leibler散度模型(KLN)的有影响力节点查找方法。首先,KLN算法删除一个节点来模拟信息传播过程中节点失效的场景。其次,KLN通过建立KL发散度模型来评估节点去除后邻域内信息熵的损失。最后,它通过集成网络属性和KL发散模型来评估移除节点的损伤影响,从而实现节点重要性的评估。为了验证KLN的性能,本文将其结果与其他11种算法在10个网络上的结果进行了分析和比较,使用SIR模型作为参考。此外,对一个真实的流行病传播网络进行了案例研究,从而提出了基于影响节点的日常保护管理和控制策略。实验结果表明,KLN在邻域内使用KL模型有效地评估了移除节点的重要性,并在不同规模的网络中表现出更好的准确性和适用性。
    As a research hot topic in the field of network security, the implementation of machine learning, such as federated learning, involves information interactions among a large number of distributed network devices. If we regard these distributed network devices and connection relationships as a complex network, we can identify the influential nodes to find the crucial points for optimizing the imbalance of the reliability of devices in federated learning system. This paper will analyze the advantages and disadvantages of existing algorithms for identifying influential nodes in complex networks, and propose a method from the perspective of information dissemination for finding influential nodes based on Kullback-Leibler divergence model within the neighborhood (KLN). Firstly, the KLN algorithm removes a node to simulate the scenario of node failure in the information dissemination process. Secondly, KLN evaluates the loss of information entropy within the neighborhood after node removal by establishing the KL divergence model. Finally, it assesses the damage influence of the removed node by integrating the network attributes and KL divergence model, thus achieving the evaluation of node importance. To validate the performance of KLN, this paper conducts an analysis and comparison of its results with those of 11 other algorithms on 10 networks, using SIR model as a reference. Additionally, a case study was undertaken on a real epidemic propagation network, leading to the proposal of management and control strategies for daily protection based on the influential nodes. The experimental results indicate that KLN effectively evaluates the importance of the removed node using KL model within the neighborhood, and demonstrate better accuracy and applicability across networks of different scales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康结果的种族差异是高档化社区的持续威胁。健康结果的一个贡献者是卫生服务的利用,人们从医疗专业人员那里得到护理的程度。在一般人群中,卫生服务利用方面存在种族差异。我们的目标是确定高档化社区中是否存在卫生服务利用方面的种族差异。
    我们使用美国社区调查的数据来确定2006年至2017年美国各地的高档化社区。我们收集了关于医疗服务利用率的三种衡量标准的数据(基于办公室的医生就诊,基于办公室的非医师访问,并拥有通常的护理来源)居住在高档化社区的2014年医疗支出小组调查的247名黑人和689名白人非西班牙裔受访者。我们使用改进的Poisson模型来确定高档化社区居民之间按种族划分的卫生服务利用率是否存在差异。
    调整年龄后,性别,教育,收入,employment,保险,婚姻状况,区域,和自我评估的健康,高档化社区的黑人居民表现出类似的以办公室为基础的医生就诊的患病率,以办公室为基础的非医师就诊的患病率较低(患病率:0.74;95%置信区间,0.60至0.91),并且具有通常的护理来源的患病率较低(患病率:0.87;95%置信区间,0.77至0.98)比白人居民高。
    美国高档化社区在卫生服务利用方面存在种族差异,这表明需要与政策相关的解决方案来创建更公平的卫生资源分配。
    UNASSIGNED: Racial disparities in health outcomes are a persistent threat in gentrifying neighborhoods. A contributor to health outcomes is health services utilization, the extent to which people receive care from a medical professional. There are documented racial disparities in health services utilization in the general population. We aim to determine whether racial disparities in health services utilization exist in gentrifying neighborhoods.
    UNASSIGNED: We used data from the American Community Survey to identify gentrifying neighborhoods across the United States from 2006 to 2017. We collected data on three measures of healthcare services utilization (office-based physician visits, office-based nonphysician visits, and having a usual source of care) for 247 Black and 689 White non-Hispanic respondents of the 2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey living in gentrifying neighborhoods. We used modified Poisson models to determine whether there is a difference in the prevalence of health services utilization by race among residents of gentrifying neighborhoods.
    UNASSIGNED: After adjusting for age, gender, education, income, employment, insurance, marital status, region, and self-rated health, Black residents of gentrifying neighborhoods demonstrated a similar prevalence of having an office-based physician visit, a lower prevalence of having an office-based nonphysician visit (prevalence ratio: 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.91), and a lower prevalence of having a usual source of care (prevalence ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.98) than White residents.
    UNASSIGNED: The existence of racial disparities in health services utilization in US gentrifying neighborhoods demonstrates a need for policy-relevant solutions to create a more equitable distribution of health resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:虽然研究表明,不良邻里状况的某些方面可能会影响儿童和青少年的体重发育,尚不清楚儿童机会指数(COI)29个邻域条件指标的综合度量,与青春期的体重结果有关。我们假设,在9岁和10岁的全国样本中,在横截面和纵向模型中,较低的COI将与较高的超重和肥胖相关,并且这种关联因性别而异。
    方法:使用来自青少年大脑认知发育研究的数据(n=11,857),我们研究了9岁和10岁儿童COI五分位数与超重和肥胖之间的横断面关系.此外,我们使用风险比在三波数据收集中检查超重和肥胖事件.
    结果:由于性别与COI之间的相互作用(p<.05),我们展示了特定性别的模型。有一个逐步的双变量关联,其中较高的COI与较低的肥胖患病率相关。这种模式在多层次模型中保持不变,与女性有更强的联系。在针对个人和家庭特征进行调整的模型中,在COI最低的五分之一区,女性青少年的肥胖几率是最高的五分之一区的1.81倍(95%置信区间:1.32,2.48).在纵向模型中,COI仅与女性肥胖相关:最低与最高COI的校正风险比=4.27(95%置信区间:1.50,12.13).
    结论:邻里机会与青春期前至青春期中期的肥胖风险相关。女性可能特别受到邻里条件的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Though research indicates that certain aspects of adverse neighborhood conditions may influence weight development in childhood and adolescence, it is unknown if the Child Opportunity Index (COI), a composite measure of 29 indicators of neighborhood conditions, is associated with weight outcomes in adolescence. We hypothesized that lower COI would be associated with higher overweight and obesity in cross-sectional and longitudinal modeling in a national sample of 9 year olds and 10 year olds and that this association would be different by sex.
    METHODS: Using data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (n = 11,857), we examined the cross-sectional association between COI quintile and overweight and obesity in 9 year olds and 10 year olds. Additionally, we used hazard ratios to examine incident overweight and obesity across three waves of data collection.
    RESULTS: Due to the interaction between sex and COI (p < .05), we present sex-specific models. There was a stepwise bivariate association, in which higher COI was associated with lower obesity prevalence. This pattern held in multilevel models, with a stronger association in females. In models adjusted for individual and household characteristics, female adolescents in the lowest quintile COI neighborhoods had 1.81 (95% confidence interval: 1.32, 2.48) times the odds of obesity compared to those in the highest quintile. In longitudinal models, the COI was associated with incident obesity in females only: adjusted hazard ratio = 4.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.50, 12.13) for lowest compared to highest COI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood opportunity is associated with risk of obesity in pre-adolescence into mid-adolescence. Females may be particularly influenced by neighborhood conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号