Determination of language hemispheric dominance (HD) in patients undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery has traditionally relied on the sodium amobarbital (Wada) test. The emergence of non-invasive methods for determining language laterality has increasingly shown to be a viable alternative. In this study, we assessed the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), compared to the Wada test, in determining language HD in a sample of 12 patients. TMS-induced speech errors were classified as speech arrest, semantic, or performance errors, and the HD was based on the total number of errors in each hemisphere with equal weighting of all errors (classic) and with a higher weighting of speech arrests and semantic errors (weighted). Using MEG, HD for language was based on the spatial extent of long-latency activity sources localized to receptive language regions. Based on the classic and weighted language laterality index (LI) in 12 patients, TMS was concordant with the Wada in 58.33% and 66.67% of patients, respectively. In eight patients, MEG language mapping was deemed conclusive, with a concordance rate of 75% with the Wada test. Our results indicate that TMS and MEG have moderate and strong agreement, respectively, with the Wada test, suggesting they could be used as non-invasive substitutes.

OBJECTIVE: Language dominance in the developing brain can vary widely across anatomical and pathological conditions as well as age groups. Repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rnTMS) has been applied to calculate the hemispheric dominance ratio (HDR) in adults. In this study, the authors aimed to assess the feasibility of using rnTMS to identify language lateralization in a pediatric neurosurgical cohort and to correlate the preoperative rnTMS findings with the postoperative language outcome.
METHODS: A consecutive prospectively collected cohort of 19 children with language-associated lesions underwent bihemispheric rnTMS mapping prior to surgery (100 stimulation sites on each hemisphere). In addition to feasibility and adverse effects, the HDR (ratio of the left hemisphere to right hemisphere error rate) was calculated. The anatomical surgical site and postoperative language outcome at 3 months after surgery were assessed according to clinical documentation.
RESULTS: Repetitive nTMS mapping was feasible in all 19 children (mean age 12.5 years, range 4-17 years; 16 left-sided lesions) without any relevant adverse events. Thirteen children (68%) showed left hemispheric dominance (HDR > 1.1), and 2 children (11%) showed right hemispheric dominance (HDR < 0.9). In 4 children (21%), the bihemispheric error rates were nearly the same (HDR ≥ 0.9 and ≤ 1.1). Sixteen children underwent surgery (14 tumor/lesion resections and 2 hemispherotomies) and 3 patients continued conservative therapy. After surgery, 4 patients (25%) showed an improvement in language function, 10 (63%) presented with stable language function, and 2 (12.5%) experienced deterioration in language function. Of the 6 patients with right hemispheric language involvement, 4 (80%) had glial tumors, 1 (20%) had focal cortical dysplasia, and 1 (20%) experienced hypoxic brain injury. Children with right hemispheric language involvement (HDR ≤ 1.1) did not show any language deterioration postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Bihemispheric rnTMS language mapping as a noninvasive mapping technique to assess lateralization of language function in the pediatric neurosurgical population is safe and feasible. Why relevant right hemispheric language function (HDR ≤ 1.1) was associated with postoperative unaltered language function needs to be validated in future studies. Bihemispheric rnTMS language mapping strengthens risk-benefit considerations prior to pediatric tumor/epilepsy surgery in language-associated areas.

In this issue of European Journal of Neurology, Robinson et al. present a novel study on primary progressive apraxia of speech. The authors describe different clinicopathological profiles in patients with left-dominant, right-dominant, and bilateral atrophy of the supplementary motor area and lateral premotor cortex. This commentary discusses the importance of this evidence for understanding individual differences among these patients, distinguishing them from those with nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia, and analyzing the relations between motor speech deficits and underlying pathology.

Many functions of the human brain are organized asymmetrically and are subject to strong population biases. Some tasks, like speaking and making complex hand movements, exhibit left hemispheric dominance, whereas others, such as spatial processing and recognizing faces, favor the right hemisphere. While pattern of preference implies the existence of a stereotypical way of distributing functions between the hemispheres, an ever-increasing body of evidence indicates that not everyone follows this pattern of hemispheric functional segregation. On the contrary, the review conducted in this article shows that departures from the standard hemispheric division of labor are routinely observed and assume many distinct forms, each having a different prevalence rate. One of the key challenges in human neuroscience is to model this variability. By integrating well-established and recently emerged ideas about the mechanisms that underlie functional lateralization, the current article proposes a general mechanistic model that explains the observed distribution of segregation phenotypes and generates new testable hypotheses.

The evidence for the hemispheric specialization of motor planning reveals several inconsistencies between the left-lateralized hypothesis and a distributed system across the hemispheres. We compared participants with left hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP) to right-handed control subjects in this study\'s first experiment by inviting them to perform a motor planning task. Participants were required to release the start button, grasp a hexagon, and rotate it according to the instructions. In the second experiment, we compared left-HCP subjects with right-HCP subjects inviting them to perform the same task (we used the data for left-HCP subjects from the first experiment). P2 amplitude, as well as planning time, grasping time, releasing time, and initial grip selection planning patterns, were used as outcome measures in both experiments. The first experiment revealed that controls acted more quickly and chose more effective planning patterns. Also, the P2 amplitude was smaller in left-HCP subjects than in control subjects. No significant group effect was observed in the second experiment for any movement-related measure or P2. At the neural level, however, there was an interaction between \'region\' and \'group,\' indicating the distinction between the two groups in the right region. The results are discussed in terms of motor planning\'s hemispheric distribution and individual differences in the HCP group.

UNASSIGNED: There was a reorganization of the brain network after stroke. Some studies have compared the characteristics of activation or functional connectivity (FC) of cortical and subcortical regions between the dominant and non-dominant hemisphere stroke.
UNASSIGNED: To analyze hemispheric dominance differences in task-state motor network properties in subacute stroke by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
UNASSIGNED: Patients with first ischemic stroke in the basal ganglia within 1-3 months after onset and age- and sex-matched right-handed healthy subjects (HS) were enrolled. fNIRS with 29 channels was used to detect the oxyhemoglobin concentration changes when performing the hand grasping task. Activation patterns of motor cortex and two macroscale and two mesoscale brain network indicators based on graph theory were compared between dominant and non-dominant hemisphere stroke.
UNASSIGNED: We enrolled 17 subjects in each of left hemisphere stroke (LHS), right hemisphere stroke (RHS), and HS groups. Both patient groups showed bilateral activation. The average weighted clustering coefficient and global efficiency of patients were lower than those of healthy people, and the inter-density was higher than that of the HS group, but the significance was different between LHS and RHS groups. The intra-density changes in the RHS group were opposite to those in the LHS group. The correlation between mesoscale indicators and motor function differed between dominant and non-dominant hemisphere stroke.
UNASSIGNED: The changes in macroscale cortical network indicators were similar between the two patient groups, while those of the mesoscale indicators were different. The mesoscale brain network characteristics were affected by the severity of dysfunction to varying degrees in the LHS and RHS patients.

This study aimed to investigate the disparity in locomotor and spatial memory deficits caused by left- or right-sided unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD) using a mouse model of unilateral labyrinthectomy (UL) and to examine the effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on the deficits over 14 days. Five experimental groups were established: the left-sided and right-sided UL (Lt.-UL and Rt.-UL) groups, left-sided and right-sided UL with bipolar GVS with the cathode on the lesion side (Lt.-GVS and Rt.-GVS) groups, and a control group with sham surgery. We assessed the locomotor and cognitive-behavioral functions using the open field (OF), Y maze, and Morris water maze (MWM) tests before (baseline) and 3, 7, and 14 days after surgical UL in each group. On postoperative day (POD) 3, locomotion and spatial working memory were more impaired in the Lt.-UL group compared with the Rt.-UL group (p < 0.01, Tamhane test). On POD 7, there was a substantial difference between the groups; the locomotion and spatial navigation of the Lt.-UL group recovered significantly more slowly compared with those of the Rt.-UL group. Although the differences in the short-term spatial cognition and motor coordination were resolved by POD 14, the long-term spatial navigation deficits assessed by the MWM were significantly worse in the Lt.-UL group compared with the Rt.-UL group. GVS intervention accelerated the vestibular compensation in both the Lt.-GVS and Rt.-GVS groups in terms of improvement of locomotion and spatial cognition. The current data imply that right- and left-sided UVD impair spatial cognition and locomotion differently and result in different compensatory patterns. Sequential bipolar GVS when the cathode (stimulating) was assigned to the lesion side accelerated recovery for UVD-induced spatial cognition, which may have implications for managing the patients with spatial cognitive impairment, especially that induced by unilateral peripheral vestibular damage on the dominant side.

Behavioural lateralization, which reflects the functional specializations of the two brain hemispheres, is assumed to play an important role in cooperative intraspecific interactions. However, there are few studies focused on the lateralization in cooperative behaviours of individuals, especially in a natural setting. In the present study, we investigated lateralized spatial interactions between the partners in life-long monogamous pairs. The male-female pairs of two geese species (barnacle, Branta leucopsis, and white-fronted, Anser albifrons geese), were observed during different stages of the annual cycle in a variety of conditions. In geese flocks, we recorded which visual hemifield (left/right) the following partner used to monitor the leading partner relevant to the type of behaviour and the disturbance factors. In a significant majority of pairs, the following bird viewed the leading partner with the left eye during routine behaviours such as resting and feeding in undisturbed conditions. This behavioural lateralization, implicating the right hemisphere processing, was consistent across the different aggregation sites and years of the study. In contrast, no significant bias was found in a variety of geese behaviours associated with enhanced disturbance (when alert on water, flying or fleeing away when disturbed, feeding during the hunting period, in urban area feeding and during moulting). We hypothesize that the increased demands for right hemisphere processing to deal with stressful and emergency situations may interfere with the manifestation of lateralization in social interactions.

People with substance use disorders (SUDs) usually experience emotion dysregulation, which may be a consequence of or a risk factor for the development and maintenance of substance misuse. Despite growing evidence on emotion dysregulation among people with SUDs, relatively few studies have explored emotion dysregulation in heroin use disorder (HUD) patients.
Using event-related potentials (ERP), we compared the emotion regulation ability of 33 HUD patients and 30 healthy controls according to their average electroencephalogram amplitudes of the late positive potential (LPP) component in 400-1000 ms and 1000-2000 ms time windows, while viewing neutral and unpleasant emotional pictures, and using emotion regulation strategies (expressive suppression, cognitive reappraisal, and a combination) while viewing unpleasant pictures. We recorded their mood states and how successfully they used emotion regulation strategies in each block using 7-point scales.
Relative to healthy controls, the LPP amplitudes of HUD patients were significantly lower when viewing emotional stimuli (pearlyLPP < 0.05) and using emotion regulation strategies (all p < 0.05). The left hemisphere was more active in healthy controls (pearlyLPP < 0.05, plateLPP < 0.01); there were no differences in scalp position activation among HUD patients.
Compared to healthy controls, HUD patients\' emotional arousal and emotion regulation ability were impaired, as reflected by the LPP component. Their abnormal scalp activation pattern may imply abnormal brain activity. Future research could explore this with electroencephalogram source analysis techniques, functional magnetic resonance imaging, or other technologies. Intervention effects for emotion dysregulation in HUD treatment are also worth exploring.

A previous study we reported in this journal suggested that left and right-handers may differ in their patterns of lateralization for different language tasks (Woodhead et al. 2019 R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 181801. (doi:10.1098/rsos.181801)). However, it had too few left-handers (N = 7) to reach firm conclusions. For this update paper, further participants were added to the sample to create separate groups of left- (N = 31) and right-handers (N = 43). Two hypotheses were tested: (1) that lateralization would be weaker at the group level in left-than right-handers; and (2) that left-handers would show weaker covariance in lateralization between tasks, supporting a two-factor model. All participants performed the same protocol as in our previous paper: lateralization was measured using functional transcranial Doppler sonography during six different language tasks, on two separate testing sessions. The results supported hypothesis 1, with significant differences in laterality between groups for four out of six tasks. For hypothesis 2, structural equation modelling showed that there was stronger evidence for a two-factor model in left than right-handers; furthermore, examination of the factor loadings suggested that the pattern of laterality across tasks may also differ between handedness groups. These results expand on what is known about the differences in laterality between left- and right-handers.