Renal disease

肾脏疾病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术语“糖化化合物”包括通过美拉德反应内源性和在食物中形成的各种结构上不同的化合物。还原糖和氨基酸之间的化学反应。内源性产生的糖基化化合物被认为有助于一系列疾病。这导致了这样的假设:食物中存在的糖化化合物也可能引起不利影响,从而对人类健康造成营养风险。在这项工作中,德国研究基金会(DFG)的参议院食品安全委员会(SKLM)总结了有关形成的数据,发生,糖化化合物的暴露和毒性(A部分),并系统地评估了定义的糖化化合物的饮食摄入与疾病之间的潜在关联,包括过敏,糖尿病,心血管和肾脏疾病,肠/胃毒性,脑/认知障碍和癌症(B部分)。在Pubmed(Medline)中进行系统搜索,Scopus和WebofScience使用关键字的组合来定义与食品主题领域相关的单个糖基化化合物和相关疾病模式,《营养与饮食》检索了253份与该研究问题相关的原始出版物。其中,只有192例符合先前定义的质量标准,因此被认为适合评估膳食糖基化化合物的潜在健康风险.对于本评估中考虑的每种不良健康影响,然而,只有有限数量的人类,动物和体外研究被确定。虽然人类的研究通常由于队列规模小而受到限制,研究持续时间短,和混杂因素,在动物中进行的实验研究允许控制暴露于单个糖化化合物,提供了一些葡萄糖耐量受损的证据,胰岛素抵抗,口服二羰基化合物对心血管的影响和肾损伤,尽管剂量水平远远超过估计的人类暴露量。总体数据库通常不一致或不确定。在此系统回顾的基础上,SKLM得出的结论是,目前尚无令人信服的证据证明饮食中摄入的糖化化合物与不良健康影响之间存在因果关系.
    考虑内源性糖基化化合物在衰老和疾病中的意义,越来越多的人建议通过食用“AGE(晚期糖基化终产物)丰富的饮食”来暴露饮食会带来潜在的健康风险。然而,试图评估膳食糖化化合物和不良健康影响之间的关联的研究经常遭受糖化化合物的化学分析不足,包括结构表征不足和定量数据有限。德国研究基金会(DFG)的参议院食品安全委员会(SKLM)先前定义了旨在评估饮食糖化化合物对人类健康影响的研究的质量标准。当前工作的目的是总结有关地层的数据,发生,糖化化合物的暴露和毒性(A部分),并系统评估当前可用的科学数据库是否允许对定义的糖化化合物的潜在健康影响进行结论性评估(B部分)。术语“糖化化合物”包括广泛的衍生自美拉德反应的结构上不同的化合物。在食品加工过程中发生的还原碳水化合物和氨基化合物之间的化学反应。在美拉德反应的第一阶段,还原糖,如葡萄糖和果糖,例如与赖氨酸的ε-氨基反应,这是最丰富的食物(“糖化”赖氨酸)。随后,这些主要反应产物经过Amadori重排,得到产物(ARP),如来自葡萄糖的果糖基赖氨酸(FL),以及Heyns重排产物(HRP),如来自果糖的葡萄糖基-和甘露糖基赖氨酸。虽然ARPs在食品加工过程中迅速形成,它们不稳定并发生降解反应,主要是1,2-二羰基化合物,如乙二醛(GO),甲基乙二醛(MGO)和3-脱氧葡萄糖酮(3-DG),这是高度反应。美拉德反应的最后阶段的特征主要在于这些二羰基化合物与蛋白质的亲核基团的反应。赖氨酸和精氨酸残基的侧链以及蛋白质的N-末端是重要的反应位点。羧基烷基化的氨基酸如N-ε-羧甲基赖氨酸(CML)和N-ε-羧基乙基赖氨酸(CEL)由赖氨酸的ε-氨基与二羰基化合物GO和MGO的反应产生。具有C5或C6链的二羰基化合物可以在赖氨酸的ε-氨基上形成环状吡咯衍生物。这种反应最重要的例子是吡咯,由3-DG和赖氨酸反应形成。二羰基化合物与精氨酸的胍基反应主要导致氢咪唑酮,其中MGO衍生的氢咪唑酮1(MG-H1)在食品系统中描述得最好。ARPs是食物中发现的最丰富的糖化产物。食品中多达55%的赖氨酸残基可以在侧链上被修饰为ARPs。ARPs特别丰富的食物包括面包,腊斯克,饼干,巧克力,和婴儿配方奶粉。接触估计范围在0.6-1.6毫克/千克体重(bw)之间,尽管在食用具有极端ARP浓度的食物的个体中,暴露量可能高达14.3mg/kgbw。特别富含二羰基化合物的食物包括热处理或长期储存的富含还原糖的物品,如果酱,替代甜味剂,软饮料,蜂蜜,糖果,饼干,还有醋,尤其是香脂型醋.MGO每日摄入量的主要贡献者,GO,3-DG是咖啡和面包。MGO的饮食暴露量估计为0.02-0.29mg/kgbw/d,GO为0.04-0.16mg/kgbw/d,3-DG为0.14-2.3mg/kgbw/d,3-脱氧半乳糖酮(3-DGal)为0.08-0.13mg/kgbw/d。饮食摄入5-羟甲基糠醛(HMF),可以由3-DG形成,估计范围在0.0001-0.9毫克/千克体重/天之间。对于CML,单个糖化氨基酸的暴露估计范围为0.03-0.35mg/kgbw/d,CEL为0.02-0.04mg/kgbw/d,MG-H1为0.19-0.41mg/kgbw/d。从由1L牛奶组成的模型饮食中,500克烘焙产品和400毫升咖啡,估计一个70公斤的人摄入的吡咯碱相当于0.36毫克/公斤体重/天。对组织或体液中的单个糖基化化合物或其代谢产物及其与氨基酸的反应产物进行定量分析,蛋白质或DNA可用于监测对糖化化合物的暴露。然而,因为糖基化化合物也是内源性形成的,这些生物标志物反映了暴露的整体,使得在内源性形成的背景下,定义由于饮食摄入导致的身体负担本身就很困难。有关糖基化化合物的毒物动力学和毒性的信息很少,并且大多限于反应性二羰基化合物GO,MGO,3-DG,HMF,和个别糖化氨基酸如CML和CEL。二羰基化合物的急性毒性为低至中等。有一些数据表明,胃肠道和肝脏中二羰基化合物的快速解毒可能会限制其口服生物利用度。GO和MGO的生物转化主要通过谷胱甘肽(GSH)依赖性乙二醛酶系统发生,并且在较小程度上通过不依赖谷胱甘肽的醛酮还原酶,它们也负责3-DG的生物转化。GO,MGO和3-DG在体外容易与DNA碱基反应,产生DNA加合物。有明确的证据表明GO的遗传毒性,MGO和3-DG。对GO的重复剂量毒性研究一致报道了伴随食物和水消耗减少的体重增加减少,但没有确定临床化学和血液学或组织病理学病变中的化合物相关变化。根据现有的研究,也没有证据表明GO和MGO具有系统性致癌性。然而,启动/促进研究表明,口服GO可能在胃肠道局部表现出基因毒性和肿瘤促进活性。一项为期2年的大鼠慢性毒性和致癌性研究,据报道,通过饮用水给药25mg/kgbw的GO的全身毒性的NOAEL是基于减轻的体重和腺胃糜烂/溃疡.未观察到其他非肿瘤性和肿瘤性病变。HMF的急性毒性也低。从小鼠的90天重复剂量毒性研究中,基于肾脏近端小管上皮细胞的细胞质改变,NOAEL为94mg/kgbw。HMF在体外遗传毒性试验中大多为阴性,尽管在促进化学反应性硫酸酯5-硫氧基甲基糠醛形成的条件下获得了诱变性的积极发现。有一些证据表明HMF在雌性B6C3F1小鼠中的致癌活性是基于肝细胞腺瘤的发病率增加,但不是在雄性小鼠和男女大鼠中。尽管糖化氨基酸的口服生物利用度数据主要限于CML,似乎糖化氨基酸在口服暴露于游离和蛋白质结合形式后可能会从胃肠道吸收。在肠道中不吸收的糖化氨基酸可能会受到肠道微生物组的代谢。存在于体循环中的糖化氨基酸通过尿液迅速消除。CML的急性口服毒性较低。在小鼠和大鼠中的研究报告了指示肾功能和肝功能受损的临床化学参数的变化。然而,这些变化与剂量无关,组织病理学评估也不支持.先前对个体糖基化化合物的风险评估未在估计的人类暴露中确定健康问题(GO,HMF),但也指出缺乏数据来得出与接触MGO相关的健康风险的确切结论。为了确定定义的糖基化化合物的饮食摄入与疾病之间的潜在关联,根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)模型的首选报告项目进行了系统评价。应用SKLM先前定义的质量标准。使用关键词的组合来定义单个糖化化合物和与食物主题领域相关的相关疾病模式,营养和饮食,在Pubmed(Medline)中进行系统搜索,进行了Scopus和WebofScience。尽管本系统综述确定了许多研究调查了“富含年龄的饮食”与不良健康影响之间的关联,只有一部分研究符合SKLM定义的质量标准,因此被认为适合评估膳食糖基化化合物的潜在健康风险.对于本评估中考虑的每种不良健康影响,仅确定了有限数量的人体研究。尽管人体研究提供了研究相关人体暴露影响的优势,这些研究没有为饮食糖化化合物的不良反应提供令人信服的证据.本系统综述中确定的动物研究为诱导糖耐量受损提供了一些证据,胰岛素抵抗,以GO和MGO为代表的二羰基化合物口服暴露对心血管的影响和肾损伤。只有有限的证据表明糖化氨基酸的高摄入与代谢紊乱之间存在联系。然而,据报道,这些影响通常发生在超过人类饮食暴露的剂量水平,通常是几个数量级。不幸的是,大多数研究只使用一种剂量水平,排除剂量反应的表征和风险评估出发点的推导。虽然体外研究提供了一些证据,表明单个糖化化合物与假定的不良健康影响之间存在潜在的机械联系。体外研究结果的临床和毒理学相关性通常由于使用高浓度的糖化化合物而受到限制,该化合物的使用远远超过了人类的饮食暴露量,并且由于体内相应不良反应的证据不足。在大多数调查糖化化合物的系统效应的研究中,尚未充分考虑的关键问题是饮食糖化化合物的口服生物利用度的程度。包括MRP可以采用的形式(例如,免费与肽结合的糖化氨基酸)。了解有多少膳食糖化化合物真正增加了重要的内源性背景,对于评估膳食MRP对人类健康的相关性至关重要。虽然从机制上看,膳食过敏原的糖化可能会影响其潜在的过敏,现有数据不支持饮食糖化化合物可能增加饮食诱导过敏风险的假设.没有人类研究解决饮食AGEs的免疫学影响。因此,没有关于饮食AGEs是否促进过敏发展的数据,现有的过敏是否增强或减弱。在许多体外研究中,据报道,抗原的IgG/E结合能力以及它们的变应原潜能主要被糖化降低。然而,一些体外研究表明,糖化蛋白与免疫细胞的受体结合,因此可能对免疫反应和炎症有促进作用。尽管来自动物研究的实验数据提供了一些证据,表明高剂量的单个糖基化化合物,如MGO和蛋白质结合的CML可能会产生某些不良健康影响,包括糖尿病,心血管,代谢和肾脏的影响,达到这些效果所需的剂量远远超过人类饮食暴露量。值得注意的是,在唯一确定的长期研究中,通过饮用水给予小鼠18个月的高剂量MGO对肾脏没有不利影响,心血管系统,或糖尿病的发展。来自动物研究的实验数据提供了高剂量的确定的糖基化化合物如MGO或蛋白质结合的CML可能影响葡萄糖稳态的证据。然而,产生这些效应所需的剂量明显超过人类饮食暴露。人类研究的结果尚无定论:三项短期干预研究表明,富含AGEs的饮食可能会损害葡萄糖稳态,而最近的一项干预研究和两项观察性研究未能显示出这种效果。对于心血管系统,有一些来自体外和体内研究的证据表明高浓度的MRPs,远高于人类的饮食暴露,可能会增强心血管系统的炎症,诱导内皮损伤,增加血压,增加血栓形成的风险。只有有限数量的人类干预研究调查了糖化化合物对心血管系统的短期暴露和长期影响的潜在影响。并产生了不一致的结果。少数可获得的观察性研究发现饮食MRP摄入量与心血管功能之间没有关联,甚至报道了有益的影响。因此,目前尚无关于膳食MRPs对炎症和心血管功能的潜在急性和慢性影响的明确结论.然而,目前也没有令人信服的证据表明膳食MRP摄入对心血管系统的潜在不利影响.此外,人体研究未提供膳食MRPs对肾功能有不利影响的证据.在高水平口服的动物研究中,据报道MGO在肾脏中引起结构和功能作用。一些研究表明,修饰的蛋白质和氨基酸的浓度,比如CML,口服后肾脏组织显着增加。一项研究表明,包含CML浓度增加的高温处理饮食对肾脏结构完整性和肾小球滤过功能受损的负面影响。膳食MRPs积累与肾功能下降的因果关系,然而,需要进一步确认。关于肠道健康,有一些证据表明,在饮食中暴露于糖化化合物后,肠道菌群组成和单个短链脂肪酸(SCFA)的产生发生了变化。然而,这与人类对健康的不良影响无关,更可能反映了肠道微生物群适应不断变化的营养物质.特别是,一项人体观察性研究和几项动物研究未发现糖化化合物的摄入与肠道炎症增加之间存在相关性.在动物研究中,我们描述了糖基化化合物对结肠炎期间肠道组织损伤和菌群失调的积极作用。考虑到二羰基化合物GO的DNA反应性和遗传毒性的明确证据,MGO和3-DG,怀疑二羰基化合物可能会引起突变和癌症。尽管有一些证据表明GO在胃肠道局部具有促进肿瘤的活性,唯一符合指南的慢性啮齿动物生物测定法报告腺胃糜烂和溃疡,但未报告治疗相关的肿瘤性病变.最近一项针对CEL的跨国队列研究,CML,和MG-H1发现没有证据支持饮食AGEs与癌症风险相关的假设。人类暴露于饮食糖化化合物与对大脑和认知表现的有害影响之间的关联的证据远非令人信服。没有发现完全符合定义的质量标准的人体研究。一些实验研究报道了饮食MRP暴露后的神经炎症和认知障碍,但这些充其量只能被认为是指示性的,并不支持人类健康的坚定结论。除了使用极高剂量的单个药物如CML,导致大量与过程相关的主要变化的苛刻处理条件无法令人信服地调和单独测量/假定的游离和蛋白质结合的CML含量所观察到的效果。总的来说,虽然饮食中的糖化化合物被声称会对健康造成广泛的不利影响,目前对文献的批判性评估得出了可用数据不足的结论,不充分或不确定,并不令人信服地支持人类健康风险与食品中存在糖化化合物有关的假设。上面详述的研究局限性,大量研究不符合定义的质量标准,因此必须被排除在外,这突出了进行充分设计的人类或动物研究以提供科学可靠的健康风险评估的重要性.为了实现这一点,高质量,各学科之间可靠的科学合作至关重要。
    The term \"glycation compounds\" comprises a wide range of structurally diverse compounds that are formed endogenously and in food via the Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing sugars and amino acids. Glycation compounds produced endogenously are considered to contribute to a range of diseases. This has led to the hypothesis that glycation compounds present in food may also cause adverse effects and thus pose a nutritional risk to human health. In this work, the Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) summarized data on formation, occurrence, exposure and toxicity of glycation compounds (Part A) and systematically assessed potential associations between dietary intake of defined glycation compounds and disease, including allergy, diabetes, cardiovascular and renal disease, gut/gastrotoxicity, brain/cognitive impairment and cancer (Part B). A systematic search in Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science using a combination of keywords defining individual glycation compounds and relevant disease patterns linked to the subject area of food, nutrition and diet retrieved 253 original publications relevant to the research question. Of these, only 192 were found to comply with previously defined quality criteria and were thus considered suitable to assess potential health risks of dietary glycation compounds. For each adverse health effect considered in this assessment, however, only limited numbers of human, animal and in vitro studies were identified. While studies in humans were often limited due to small cohort size, short study duration, and confounders, experimental studies in animals that allow for controlled exposure to individual glycation compounds provided some evidence for impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, cardiovascular effects and renal injury in response to oral exposure to dicarbonyl compounds, albeit at dose levels by far exceeding estimated human exposures. The overall database was generally inconsistent or inconclusive. Based on this systematic review, the SKLM concludes that there is at present no convincing evidence for a causal association between dietary intake of glycation compounds and adverse health effects.
    Considering the implication of endogenous glycation compounds in aging and disease, dietary exposure via consumption of an “AGE (advanced glycation end product) rich diet” is increasingly suggested to pose a potential health risk. However, studies attempting to assess an association between dietary glycation compounds and adverse health effects frequently suffer from insufficient chemical analysis of glycation compounds, including inadequate structural characterization and limited quantitative data. The Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) of the German Research Foundation (DFG) previously defined quality criteria for studies designed to assess the effects of dietary glycation compounds on human health. The aim of the present work is to summarize data on formation, occurrence, exposure and toxicity of glycation compounds (Part A) and to systematically evaluate if the currently available scientific database allows for a conclusive assessment of potential health effects of defined glycation compounds (Part B).The term “glycation compounds” comprises a wide range of structurally diverse compounds that derive from the Maillard reaction, a chemical reaction between reducing carbohydrates and amino compounds that occurs during food processing. In the first stage of the Maillard reaction, reducing sugars such as glucose and fructose react for instance with the ε-amino group of lysine, which is most abundant in food (“glycation” of lysine). Subsequently, these primary reaction products undergo Amadori rearrangement to yield products (ARP) such as fructosyllysine (FL) from glucose and also Heyns rearrangement products (HRPs) such as glucosyl- and mannosyllysine from fructose. While ARPs are rapidly formed during food processing, they are not stable and undergo degradation reactions, predominantly to 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds such as glyoxal (GO), methylglyoxal (MGO) and 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG), which are highly reactive. The last stage of the Maillard reaction is characterized predominantly by the reaction of these dicarbonyl compounds with nucleophilic groups of proteins. The side-chains of lysine and arginine residues as well as the N-termini of proteins are important reaction sites. Carboxyalkylated amino acids such as N-ε-carboxymethyllysine (CML) and N-ε-carboxyethyllysine (CEL) result from reaction of the ε-amino group of lysine with the dicarbonyl compounds GO and MGO. Dicarbonyl compounds with C5 or C6 chains can form cyclic pyrrole derivatives at the ε-amino group of lysine. The most important example for this reaction is pyrraline, which is formed from reaction of 3-DG and lysine. The reaction of dicarbonyl compounds with the guanidino group of arginine mainly leads to hydroimidazolones, of which the MGO-derived hydroimidazolone 1 (MG-H1) is best described in food systems.ARPs are the most abundant glycation products found in food. Up to 55% of the lysine residues in food may be modified to ARPs at the side-chain. Food items particularly rich in ARPs include bread, rusk, biscuits, chocolate, and powdered infant formulas. Exposure estimates range between 0.6–1.6 mg/kg body weight (bw), although exposure may be as high as 14.3 mg/kg bw in individuals consuming foods with extreme ARP concentrations. Foods particularly rich in dicarbonyl compounds include heat-treated or long-term stored items rich in reducing sugars such as jams, alternative sweeteners, soft drinks, honey, candies, cookies, and vinegars, especially balsamico-type vinegars. The main contributors to the daily intake of MGO, GO, and 3-DG are coffee and bread. Dietary exposure to dicarbonyl compounds has been estimated to range between 0.02–0.29 mg/kg bw/d for MGO, 0.04–0.16 mg/kg bw/d for GO, 0.14–2.3 mg/kg bw/d for 3-DG, and 0.08–0.13 mg/kg bw/d for 3-deoxygalactosone (3-DGal). Dietary intake of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), which can be formed from 3-DG, is estimated to range between 0.0001–0.9 mg/kg bw/d. Exposure estimates for individual glycated amino acids range from 0.03–0.35 mg/kg bw/d for CML, 0.02–0.04 mg/kg bw/d for CEL and 0.19–0.41 mg/kg bw/d for MG-H1. From a model diet consisting of 1 L milk, 500 g bakery products and 400 mL coffee, an intake of pyrraline corresponding to 0.36 mg/kg bw/d for a 70 kg person was estimated.Quantitative analysis of individual glycation compounds or their metabolites in tissues or body fluids as well as their reaction products with amino acids, proteins or DNA may serve to monitor exposure to glycation compounds. However, since glycation compounds are also formed endogenously, these biomarkers reflect the totality of the exposure, making it inherently difficult to define the body burden due to dietary intake against the background of endogenous formation.Information on the toxicokinetics and toxicity of glycation compounds is scarce and mostly limited to the reactive dicarbonyl compounds GO, MGO, 3-DG, HMF, and individual glycated amino acids such as CML and CEL. Acute toxicity of dicarbonyl compounds is low to moderate. There are some data to suggest that rapid detoxification of dicarbonyls in the gastrointestinal tract and liver may limit their oral bioavailability. Biotransformation of GO and MGO occurs predominantly via the glutathione (GSH)-dependent glyoxalase system, and to a lesser extent via glutathione-independent aldo-keto-reductases, which are also responsible for biotransformation of 3-DG. GO, MGO and 3-DG readily react with DNA bases in vitro, giving rise to DNA adducts. There is clear evidence for genotoxicity of GO, MGO and 3-DG. Repeated dose toxicity studies on GO consistently reported reduced body weight gain concomitant with reduced food and water consumption but did not identify compound related changes in clinical chemistry and hematology or histopathological lesions. There is also no evidence for systemic carcinogenicity of GO and MGO based on the available studies. However, initiation/promotion studies indicate that oral exposure to GO may exhibit genotoxic and tumor promoting activity locally in the gastrointestinal tract. From a 2-year chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study in rats, a NOAEL for systemic toxicity of GO administered via drinking water of 25 mg/kg bw was reported based on reduced body weight and erosions/ulcer in the glandular stomach. Other non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions were not observed. Acute toxicity of HMF is also low. From a 90-day repeated dose toxicity study in mice, a NOAEL of 94 mg/kg bw was derived based on cytoplasmic alterations of proximal tubule epithelial cells of the kidney. HMF was mostly negative in in vitro genotoxicity tests, although positive findings for mutagenicity were obtained under conditions that promote formation of the chemically reactive sulfuric acid ester 5-sulfoxymethylfurfural. There is some evidence of carcinogenic activity of HMF in female B6C3F1 mice based on increased incidences of hepatocellular adenoma, but not in male mice and rats of both sexes. Although data on oral bioavailability of glycated amino acids are mostly limited to CML, it appears that glycated amino acids may be absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after oral exposure to their free and protein bound form. Glycated amino acids that are not absorbed in the intestine may be subject to metabolism by the gut microbiome. Glycated amino acids present in the systemic circulation are rapidly eliminated via the urine. Acute oral toxicity of CML is low. Studies in mice and rats reported changes in clinical chemistry parameters indicative of impaired renal and hepatic function. However, these changes were not dose-related and not supported by histopathological evaluation.Previous risk assessments of individual glycation compounds did not identify a health concern at estimated human exposures (GO, HMF) but also noted the lack of data to draw firm conclusions on health risks associated with exposure to MGO.To identify potential associations between dietary intake of defined glycation compounds and disease a systematic review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) model, applying the quality criteria previously defined by the SKLM. Using a combination of keywords defining individual glycation compounds and relevant disease patterns linked to the subject area of food, nutrition and diet, a systematic search in Pubmed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science was performed. Although the present systematic review identified numerous studies that investigated an association between an “AGE-rich diet” and adverse health effects, only a subset of studies was found to comply with the quality criteria defined by the SKLM and was thus considered suitable to assess potential health risks of dietary glycation compounds.For each adverse health effect considered in this assessment, only limited numbers of human studies were identified. Although studies in humans offer the advantage of investigating effects at relevant human exposures, these studies did not provide compelling evidence for adverse effects of dietary glycation compounds. Animal studies identified in this systematic review provide some evidence for induction of impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, cardiovascular effects and renal injury in response to oral exposure to GO and MGO as representatives of dicarbonyl compounds. Only limited evidence points to a link between high intake of glycated amino acids and metabolic disorders. However, these effects were typically reported to occur at dose levels that exceed human dietary exposure, often by several orders of magnitude. Unfortunately, most studies employed only one dose level, precluding characterization of dose-response and derivation of a point of departure for risk assessment. While in vitro studies provide some evidence for a potential mechanistic link between individual glycation compounds and presumed adverse health effects, the clinical and toxicological relevance of the in vitro findings is often limited by the use of high concentrations of glycation compounds that by far exceed human dietary exposure and by insufficient evidence for corresponding adverse effects in vivo. A key question that has not been adequately considered in most studies investigating systemic effects of glycation compounds is the extent of oral bioavailability of dietary glycation compounds, including the form in which MRPs may be taken up (e.g. free vs. peptide bound glycated amino acids). Understanding how much dietary glycation compounds really add to the significant endogenous background is critical to appraise the relevance of dietary MRPs for human health.While it appears mechanistically plausible that glycation of dietary allergens may affect their allergenic potential, the currently available data do not support the hypothesis that dietary glycation compounds may increase the risk for diet-induced allergies. There are no human studies addressing the immunological effects of dietary AGEs. Accordingly, there are no data on whether dietary AGEs promote the development of allergies, nor whether existing allergies are enhanced or attenuated. In numerous in vitro studies, the IgG/E binding ability of antigens and therefore their allergenic potential has been predominantly reported to be reduced by glycation. However, some in vitro studies showed that glycated proteins bind to receptors of immunological cells, and thus may have promoting effects on immune response and inflammation.Although experimental data from animal studies provide some evidence that high doses of individual glycation compounds such as MGO and protein-bound CML may produce certain adverse health effects, including diabetogenic, cardiovascular, metabolic and renal effects, the doses required to achieve these effects by far exceed human dietary exposures. Of note, in the only long-term study identified, a high dose of MGO administered via drinking water to mice for 18 months had no adverse effects on the kidneys, cardiovascular system, or development of diabetes.Experimental data from animal studies provide evidence that high doses of defined glycation compounds such as MGO or protein-bound CML may affect glucose homeostasis. However, the doses required to produce these effects markedly exceed human dietary exposure. Results from human studies are inconclusive: Three short-term intervention studies suggested that diets rich in AGEs may impair glucose homeostasis, whereas one recent intervention study and two observational studies failed to show such an effect.For the cardiovascular system, there is some evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies that high concentrations of MRPs, well above the dietary exposure of humans, may enhance inflammation in the cardiovascular system, induce endothelial damage, increase blood pressure and increase the risk of thrombosis. Only a limited number of human intervention studies investigated potential effects of short-term exposure and longer-term effects of glycation compounds on the cardiovascular system, and yielded inconsistent results. The few observational studies available either found no association between dietary MRP intake and cardiovascular function or even reported beneficial effects. Therefore, currently no definitive conclusion on potential acute and chronic effects of dietary MRPs on inflammation and cardiovascular function can be drawn. However, there is currently also no convincing evidence that potential adverse effects on the cardiovascular system are triggered by dietary MRP intake.Furthermore, human studies did not provide evidence for an adverse effect of dietary MRPs on kidney function. In animal studies with high levels of oral intake, MGO was reported to cause structural and functional effects in the kidney. Several studies show that the concentration of modified proteins and amino acids, such as CML, increases significantly in kidney tissue after oral intake. One study showed a negative effect of a high-temperature-treated diet containing increased CML concentrations on kidney structure integrity and impaired glomerular filtration. The causative relationship of accumulation of dietary MRPs and a functional decline of the kidneys, however, needs further confirmation.With regard to gut health, there is some evidence for alterations in gut microflora composition and the production of individual short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) upon dietary exposure to glycation compounds. However, this has not been linked to adverse health effects in humans and may rather reflect adaptation of the gut microbiota to changing nutrients. In particular, a human observational study and several animal studies did not find a correlation between the intake of glycation compounds and increased intestinal inflammation. In animal studies, positive effects of glycation compounds on gut tissue damage and dysbiosis during colitis were described.Considering clear evidence for DNA reactivity and genotoxicity of the dicarbonyl compounds GO, MGO and 3-DG, it is plausible to suspect that dicarbonyl compounds may induce mutations and cancer. Although there is some evidence for tumor promoting activity of GO locally in the gastrointestinal tract, the only guideline-compatible chronic rodent bioassays reported erosions and ulcer in the glandular stomach but no treatment-related neoplastic lesions. A recent multinational cohort study with focus on CEL, CML, and MG-H1 found no evidence to support the hypothesis that dietary AGEs are linked to cancer risk.Evidence for an association between human exposure to dietary glycation compounds and detrimental effects on the brain and on cognitive performance is far from being compelling. No human studies fully complying with the defined quality criteria were identified. A few experimental studies reported neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment following dietary MRP exposure, but these can be considered indicative at best and do not support firm conclusions for human health. In addition to utilizing exceedingly high dosages of individual agents like CML, harsh processing conditions causing a multitude of major process-related changes do not allow to convincingly reconcile effects observed with measured/supposed contents of free and protein-bound CML alone.Overall, although dietary glycation compounds have been claimed to contribute to a wide range of adverse health effects, the present critical evaluation of the literature allows the conclusion that the available data are insufficient, inadequate or inconclusive and do not compellingly support the hypothesis of human health risks being related to the presence of glycation compounds in food. The study limitations detailed above, together with the fact that a large number of studies did not comply with the defined quality criteria and therefore had to be excluded highlight the importance of performing adequately designed human or animal studies to inform scientifically reliable health risk assessment.To achieve this, high quality, dependable scientific cooperation within various disciplines is pivotal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)越来越多地被诊断为老年人。我们的目标是评估不同降糖药物在这一特定人群中的优势和潜在缺陷。
    方法:进行了网络荟萃分析,以确定随机对照试验,该试验检查了年龄≥65岁的T2DM成人以患者为中心的结局。我们搜索了PubMed,科克伦中部,和Embase至2023年9月23日。使用CochraneRoB2.0工具评估合格研究的质量。
    结果:共纳入22项试验,涉及41654名参与者,掺入钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT2)抑制剂,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs),二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂,二甲双胍,磺酰脲类(SU)和阿卡波糖。我们的研究结果表明,GLP-1RA可降低主要不良心血管事件的风险(风险比[RR],0.83;95%置信区间[CI],0.71至0.97)和体重(平均差[MD],-3.87千克;95%CI,-5.54至-2.21)。SGLT2抑制剂可预防心力衰竭住院(RR,0.66;95%CI,0.57至0.77),肾脏综合结局(RR,0.69;95%CI,0.53至0.89),并减轻体重(MD,-1.85千克;95%CI,-2.42至-1.27)。SU治疗会增加任何低血糖的风险(RR,4.19;95%CI,3.52至4.99)和严重低血糖(RR,7.06;95%CI,3.03至16.43)。GLP-1RA,SGLT2抑制剂,二甲双胍,SU和DPP-4抑制剂可有效降低血糖参数。值得注意的是,在大多数情况下,随着年龄的增加,所需的治疗次数减少。
    结论:对于老年糖尿病患者,应优先选择效益大于风险的新型降糖药物。
    BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasingly being diagnosed in older adults. Our objective is to assess the advantages and potential drawbacks of different glucose-lowering medications in this specific population.
    METHODS: A network meta-analysis was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that examined patient-centered outcomes in adults aged ≥65 years with T2DM. We searched PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase up to September 23, 2023. Quality of eligible studies were assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool.
    RESULTS: A total of 22 trials that involved 41 654 participants were included, incorporating sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, metformin, sulfonylureas (SU) and acarbose. Our findings reveal that GLP-1RAs reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71 to 0.97) and body weight (mean difference [MD], -3.87 kg; 95% CI, -5.54 to -2.21). SGLT2 inhibitors prevent hospitalization for heart failure (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.77), renal composite outcome (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.89), and reduce body weights (MD, -1.85 kg; 95% CI, -2.42 to -1.27). SU treatment increases the risk of any hypoglycaemia (RR, 4.19; 95% CI, 3.52 to 4.99) and severe hypoglycaemia (RR, 7.06; 95% CI, 3.03 to 16.43). GLP-1RAs, SGLT2 inhibitors, metformin, SU and DPP-4 inhibitors are effective in reducing glycaemic parameters. Notably, the number of treatments needed decreases in most cases as age increases.
    CONCLUSIONS: Novel glucose-lowering medications with benefits that outweigh risks should be prioritized for older patients with diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    X-连锁无丙种球蛋白血症(XLA)是一种以反复感染为特征的体液免疫缺陷疾病,严重的低丙种球蛋白血症,循环B细胞缺乏.虽然XLA的标志性临床表现通常包括呼吸道,皮肤病学,和胃肠系统,肾脏受累是罕见的。在这篇文章中,我们报告了两例XLA并发肾脏疾病,补充了对记录在案的案例的审查。
    所描述的两个案例涉及孪生兄弟,均表现为呼吸道感染和肾脏表现。随后的基因检测证实了XLA的诊断。弟弟在静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)治疗和抗感染治疗后表现出改善。由于资金紧张,哥哥只接受了抗感染和对症治疗。出院后七个月,哥哥患上了肾炎。然而,他在IVIG治疗后表现出改善。
    对于复发性感染的男性儿童,应考虑进行免疫分析和基因检测,以促进XLA的有效诊断。定期监测对于检测和治疗XLA患者的免疫介导的肾脏疾病也是必要的。
    UNASSIGNED: X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA) is a humoral immunodeficiency disorder characterized by recurrent infections, severe hypogammaglobulinemia, and a deficiency of circulating B cells. While the hallmark clinical manifestations of XLA typically include the respiratory, dermatological, and gastrointestinal systems, renal involvement is infrequent. In this article, we report two cases of XLA with concurrent renal disease, supplemented with a review of documented cases.
    UNASSIGNED: The two cases described involve twin brothers, both presenting with respiratory tract infections and renal manifestations. Subsequent genetic testing confirmed the diagnosis of XLA. The younger brother exhibited improvement following intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy and anti-infection treatment. Due to financial constraints, the older brother received only anti-infection and symptomatic treatments. Seven months after discharge, the older brother developed nephritis. However, he showed improvement following IVIG treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Immune profiling and genetic testing should be considered in male children with recurrent infections to facilitate the effective diagnosis of XLA. Regular monitoring is also imperative to detect and treat immune-mediated renal diseases in patients with XLA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在概述医学复杂患者的偏头痛治疗策略,包括那些有肾脏的,肝脏,和心血管疾病。
    结果:在心血管疾病中,激素对于急性治疗可能是安全的;NSAIDs,麦角胺,不建议使用Triptans。β受体阻滞剂,ACEi/ARB,和维拉帕米除了偏头痛的预防性益处外,还有潜在的心血管益处.Frovatriptan在肾脏疾病或轻度至中度肝脏疾病中不需要剂量调整。在轻度和中度肾脏和肝脏疾病中,Gepants是安全的急性和预防性治疗选择。TCA和丙戊酸在肾病中不需要剂量调整。烟草素毒素A在心脏疾病中可能是安全的,肾,和肝功能损害。虽然CGRP单克隆抗体在肾脏和肝脏疾病中可能是安全的,在这些疾病以及心脏病中需要进一步的研究,没有剂量建议。有效的选择可用于那些复杂的医疗合并症。在这些复杂人群中,需要进一步研究新型偏头痛特异性疗法的安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: The current review aims to provide an overview of migraine treatment strategies in medically complex patients, including those with renal, liver, and cardiovascular disease.
    RESULTS: In cardiovascular disease, gepants are likely safe for acute therapy; NSAIDs, ergotamines, and triptans are not recommended. Beta-blockers, ACEi/ARBs, and verapamil have potential cardiovascular benefits in addition to migraine preventive benefit. Frovatriptan requires no dose adjustments in kidney disease or in mild to moderate liver disease. Gepants are safe acute and preventive treatment options in mild and moderate renal and hepatic disease. TCAs and valproic acid require no dose adjustments in renal disease. OnabotulinumtoxinA is likely safe in cardiac, renal, and hepatic impairment. Although CGRP monoclonal antibodies are likely safe in renal and hepatic disease, further study is needed in these conditions as well as in cardiac disease, and no dosing recommendations are available. Effective options are available for those with complex medical comorbidities. Further research is required on the safety of newer migraine-specific therapies in these complex populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    血清和尿调节素被评估为肾脏疾病的潜在生物标志物。我们研究的目的是选择更合适的尿调节素形式来诊断慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的早期阶段。我们还重点研究了一个品种的年龄和性别对尿调蛋白的影响以及可能的品种间差异。在2岁以下的狗中,血清尿调节素的值最低,但性别没有影响,品种,或观察到CKD。与尿调节蛋白转化为尿比重相比,CKD第2阶段犬的尿尿调节蛋白显着降低(p=0.003)。与德国牧羊犬相比,比利时牧羊犬的尿路调节素均显着降低(p<0.0001,p=0.0054),但不受性别或年龄的影响。在CKD的第一阶段,尿调节蛋白与肾脏疾病标志物SDMA(p=0.0424,p=0.0214)和UPC(p=0.0050,p=0.0024)相关。尿路调节素似乎比血清尿路调节素更与CKD相关。对于尿路调节素作为早期疾病标志物的适用性,需要对更多患者进行进一步研究。
    Serum and urinary uromodulin are evaluated as potential biomarkers of kidney disease. The aim of our research was to select a more appropriate form of uromodulin for the diagnosis of early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). We also focused on the influence of age and gender in one breed on uromodulin and on the possible interbreed differences. Serum uromodulin had the lowest values in dogs younger than 2 years but no effect of gender, breed, or CKD was observed. Urinary uromodulin indexed to urinary creatinine was significantly reduced in dogs in stage 2 of CKD (p = 0.003) in contrast to uromodulin converted to urine specific gravity. Urinary uromodulin with both corrections was significantly lower in Belgian shepherds compared to German shepherds (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0054) but was not influenced by gender or age. In stage 1 of CKD, urinary uromodulin correlated with kidney disease markers SDMA (p = 0.0424, p = 0.0214) and UPC (p = 0.0050, p = 0.0024). Urinary uromodulin appears to be more associated with CKD than serum uromodulin. Further studies with a larger number of patients are needed for the suitability of urinary uromodulin as a marker of early-stage disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肾脏受累于炎症性肠病是相当罕见的。这项研究旨在描述IBD儿科患者肾脏受累的频谱,并减少检测和管理的延迟。
    方法:这是一项对所有患者肾功能的回顾性研究,年龄<18岁,从2019年1月到2023年1月,我们的儿科消化内科一直随访IBD。
    结果:本研究纳入的75例IBD患者中,有16%有肾脏表现。尿液分析显示7例患者有蛋白尿,蛋白尿和血尿3例,蛋白尿和糖尿2例。对所有12例尿常规异常患者进行了进一步调查,以确定肾损害的原因,结果如下:2例患者患有肾小球肾炎,另外2例患者肾损害是由于药物不良反应。1例患有肾盂肾炎并伴有慢性活动性肾小管间质性肾炎,另1例患有薄基底膜疾病。3例患者患有IBD相关的依赖性肾脏受累,1例由于淀粉样变性而导致慢性肾功能衰竭。
    结论:所有临床医生都必须意识到IBD患者肾脏表现的可能性,以便早期诊断和预防这些表现和并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: Renal involvement in inflammatory bowel disease is rather uncommon. This study aims to describe the spectrum of renal involvement in pediatric patients with IBD and reduce delay in detection and management.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective study of the renal function of all patients, aged <18 years, who have been followed for IBD in our pediatric gastroenterology department from January 2019 till January 2023.
    RESULTS: From the 75 IBD patients included in this study 16 % had renal manifestations. The urinalysis revealed proteinuria in 7 patients, proteinuria and hematuria in 3 and proteinuria and glycosuria in 2 patients. All 12 patients with abnormal urinalysis underwent further investigation in order to determine the cause of renal damage and the results are as follows: 2 patients had glomerulonephritis and in other 2 patients renal damage was due to medication adverse effect, 1 had pyelonephritis in combination with chronic active tubulointerstitial nephritis and another 1 had thin basement membrane disease. Three patients had IBD-related dependent renal involvement and 1 resulted in chronic renal failure due to amyloidosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is important for all clinicians to be aware of the possibility of renal manifestations in IBD patients for the early diagnosis and prevention of these manifestations and complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    髓源性生长因子(MYDGF)是一种新型分泌蛋白,具有有效的抗凋亡和组织修复特性,存在于近140个人类组织和细胞系中。在口腔上皮和皮肤中丰度最高。最初,在骨髓来源的单核细胞和巨噬细胞中发现MYDGF用于心肌梗死后的心脏保护和修复。随后的研究表明,MYDGF在其他心血管疾病中起着重要作用(例如,动脉粥样硬化和心力衰竭),代谢紊乱,肾脏疾病,自身免疫性/炎症性疾病,和癌症。尽管基本机制尚未得到充分探索,MYDGF在健康和疾病中的作用可能涉及细胞凋亡和增殖,组织修复和再生,抗炎,和糖脂代谢调节。在这次审查中,我们总结了目前在了解MYDGF在健康和疾病中的作用方面的进展,专注于它的结构,功能和机制。图形摘要显示了MYDGF在不同器官和疾病中的当前作用(图。1).
    Myeloid-derived growth factor (MYDGF) is a novel secreted protein with potent antiapoptotic and tissue-repairing properties that is present in nearly 140 human tissues and cell lines, with the highest abundance in the oral epithelium and skin. Initially, MYDGF was found in bone marrow-derived monocytes and macrophages for cardioprotection and repair after myocardial infarction. Subsequent studies have shown that MYDGF plays an important role in other cardiovascular diseases (e.g., atherosclerosis and heart failure), metabolic disorders, renal disease, autoimmune/inflammatory disorders, and cancers. Although the underlying mechanisms have not been fully explored, the role of MYDGF in health and disease may involve cell apoptosis and proliferation, tissue repair and regeneration, anti-inflammation, and glycolipid metabolism regulation. In this review, we summarize the current progress in understanding the role of MYDGF in health and disease, focusing on its structure, function and mechanisms. The graphical abstract shows the current role of MYDGF in different organs and diseases (Fig. 1).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头发皮质醇浓度(HCC)和问卷被用作慢性应激状态和生活质量(QoL)的指标,分别,在猫。迄今为止,关于两种指标在不适猫中同时应用的研究有限。我们的目的是评估从健康猫队列(n=61)和慢性肾病(CKD)(n=78)或疑似猫传染性腹膜炎(FIP)(n=24)的猫队列获得的HCC和问卷调查数据。此外,我们还调查了HCC与临床病理数据之间的相关性。对于这项研究,收集猫腹部的毛发并使用商业ELISA试剂盒分析HCC。业主还填写了一份问卷,从中计算平均项目加权影响评分(AWIS)。患有晚期CKD的猫(中位数,HCC=330.15pg/mg,AWIS=-0.43)与早期CKD(HCC=183.56pg/mg相比,HCC显着升高(p<0.01),AWIS显着降低(p<0.01),AWIS=1.08)。同样,怀疑FIP的猫之间的HCC(p<0.001)和AWIS(p<0.001)均存在显着差异(HCC=896.27pg/mg,AWIS=-1.97)和健康猫(HCC=181.24pg/mg,AWIS=1.24)。HCC结果和问卷结果之间的一致性程度提醒我们,慢性疾病的严重程度或危及生命的疾病的存在可以显着增加压力,因此可以影响猫的QoL。
    Hair cortisol concentration (HCC) and a questionnaire were used as indicators of chronic stress status and quality of life (QoL), respectively, in cats. To date, there has been limited research on the simultaneous application of both indicators in unwell cats. Our aim was to evaluate HCC and questionnaire data obtained from a healthy cat cohort (n = 61) and cat cohorts with either chronic kidney disease (CKD) (n = 78) or suspected feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) (n = 24). Furthermore, we also investigated the correlation between HCC and clinical pathological data. For this study, hair from the abdomen of cats was collected and analyzed for HCC using a commercial ELISA kit. Owners also completed a questionnaire, from which average-item-weighted-impact-scores (AWISs) were calculated. Cats with late-stage-CKD (median, HCC = 330.15 pg/mg, AWIS = -0.43) presented with a significantly higher HCC (p < 0.01) and a significantly lower AWIS (p < 0.01) than cats with early-stage-CKD (HCC = 183.56 pg/mg, AWIS = 1.08). Similarly, there were significant differences in both HCC (p < 0.001) and AWIS (p < 0.001) between cats with suspected FIP (HCC = 896.27 pg/mg, AWIS = -1.97) and healthy cats (HCC = 181.24 pg/mg, AWIS = 1.24). The degree of consistency between the HCC results and the questionnaire results reminds us that the severity of a chronic disease or the presence of a life-threatening disease can significantly increase stress and thus can affect the QoL of cats.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞周期停滞生物标志物(金属蛋白酶-2[uTIMP-2]和胰岛素样生长因子结合蛋白7[uIGFBP7]的组织抑制剂),中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)变量是早期诊断急性肾损伤(AKI)的有价值的生物标志物.
    目的:评估uTIMP-2,uIGFBP7,NGAL的排泄分数(FeNGAL),和健康狗的尿与血清NGAL比率(u/sNGAL),有AKI的狗,患有慢性肾病(CKD)的狗,和重症(CI)狗。
    方法:42只客户拥有的狗(健康,n=10;AKI,n=11;CKD,n=11;CI,n=10)。
    方法:前瞻性,观察性研究。在评估常规肾脏生物标志物后,测量应激(uTIMP-2,uIGFBP7)和损伤(NGAL)生物标志物,使用ELISA试剂盒,并对尿肌酐(uCr)进行归一化。
    结果:归一化uTIMP-2和[uTIMP-2]×[uIGFBP7]/uCr在AKI组中明显更高(中位数151.9[范围,2.2-534.2]和62.9[1.1-266.8]pg/mL),与健康狗相比(0.3[0.2-74.7];P<.001和0.16[0.1-58.1]pg/mL;P<.001),CKD犬(0.7[0.3-742.5];P=.04和0.37[0.2-180.1]pg/mL;P=.03)和CI犬(1.9[0.2-37.0];P=.03和0.8[0.1-16.1]pg/mL;P=.02)。NGAL的排泄分数在患有AKI的狗中显著更高(54.17[7.93-155.32]%),健康犬(0.03[0.01-0.21]%;P<.001)和CI犬(3.05[0.05-28.86]%;P=.02)。
    结论:归一化uTIMP-2,[uTIMP-2]×[uIGFBP7]/uCr,FeNGAL可以作为早期诊断犬AKI的肾脏生物标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Cell cycle arrest biomarkers (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 [uTIMP-2] and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 [uIGFBP7]), and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) variables are valuable biomarkers for early diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) in people.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate uTIMP-2, uIGFBP7, fractional excretion of NGAL (FeNGAL), and urinary to serum NGAL ratio (u/sNGAL) in healthy dogs, dogs with AKI, dogs with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and critically ill (CI) dogs.
    METHODS: Forty-two client-owned dogs (healthy, n = 10; AKI, n = 11; CKD, n = 11; CI, n = 10).
    METHODS: Prospective, observational study. After assessment of routine renal biomarkers, stress (uTIMP-2, uIGFBP7) and damage (NGAL) biomarkers were measured, using ELISA kits, and normalized to urinary creatinine (uCr).
    RESULTS: Normalized uTIMP-2 and [uTIMP-2] × [uIGFBP7]/uCr were significantly higher in the AKI group (median 151.9 [range, 2.2-534.2] and 62.9 [1.1-266.8] pg/mL respectively), compared to healthy dogs (0.3 [0.2-74.7]; P < .001 and 0.16 [0.1-58.1] pg/mL; P < .001), dogs with CKD (0.7 [0.3-742.5]; P = .04 and 0.37 [0.2-180.1] pg/mL; P = .03) and CI dogs (1.9 [0.2-37.0]; P = .03 and 0.8 [0.1-16.1] pg/mL; P = .02). Fractional excretion of NGAL was significantly higher in dogs with AKI (54.17 [7.93-155.32] %), than in healthy (0.03 [0.01-0.21] %; P < .001) and CI dogs (3.05 [0.05-28.86] %; P = .02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Normalized uTIMP-2, [uTIMP-2] × [uIGFBP7]/uCr, and FeNGAL can be valuable renal biomarkers for early diagnosis of AKI in dogs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号