Hallucinogens

致幻剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管人们对迷幻药的兴趣与日俱增,缺乏对迷幻药微量给药的常规基于人群的监测(服用“潜意识”剂量的迷幻药,大约是全剂量的二十分之一到五分之一,长时间)。分析Google搜索查询可以提供对公共利益的见解,并帮助解决这一差距。
    通过Google搜索查询分析美国微剂量的公共利益趋势,并评估其与大麻和迷幻立法改革的关联。
    在这项横断面研究中,从2010年1月1日至2023年12月31日,我们采用动态事件-时差时间序列分析评估大麻和迷幻药物立法对微量给药搜索率的影响.谷歌搜索率提到“微剂量”,“\”微剂量,\"\"微剂量,在美国和美国各州内的“或”微剂量“是汇总测量的。
    颁布(1)当地迷幻药非刑事化法律;(2)迷幻药辅助治疗和全州迷幻药非刑事化的合法化;(3)全州医疗大麻使用法律;(4)全州娱乐性大麻使用法律;(5)所有大麻和迷幻药的使用受到限制。
    测量了每1000万个Google查询的微剂量搜索,检查美国各地搜索率的年度和月度变化,包括相关搜索的频率和性质。
    美国微量给药的搜索在2014年之前保持稳定,此后每年增加,从2015年到2023年,累计增长了13.4倍(每1000万次搜索7.9到每1000万次搜索105.6,分别)。2023年,美国有300万次微剂量搜索。州一级的分析显示,当地的迷幻非刑事化法律与搜索率每1000万增加22.4相关(95%CI,7.5-37.2),全州迷幻治疗合法化和非刑事化与搜索率增加28.9/10百万相关(95%CI,16.5-41.2),全州范围内的休闲大麻法律与搜索率每1000万增加40.9相关(95%CI,28.6-53.3),和全州范围内的医用大麻法律与搜索率每10百万增加11.5相关(95%CI,6.0-16.9).从2023年8月到12月,各州之间每月微量剂量搜索率变化的27.0%是由大麻和迷幻药法律地位的差异解释的。
    这项横断面研究发现,国家主导的大麻和迷幻药立法改革与公众对微剂量迷幻药的兴趣增加有关。
    UNASSIGNED: Despite growing interest in psychedelics, there is a lack of routine population-based surveillance of psychedelic microdosing (taking \"subperceptual\" doses of psychedelics, approximately one-twentieth to one-fifth of a full dose, over prolonged periods). Analyzing Google search queries can provide insights into public interest and help address this gap.
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze trends in public interest in microdosing in the US through Google search queries and assess their association with cannabis and psychedelic legislative reforms.
    UNASSIGNED: In this cross-sectional study, a dynamic event-time difference-in-difference time series analysis was used to assess the impact of cannabis and psychedelic legislation on microdosing search rates from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. Google search rates mentioning \"microdosing,\" \"micro dosing,\" \"microdose,\" or \"micro dose\" within the US and across US states were measured in aggregate.
    UNASSIGNED: Enactment of (1) local psychedelic decriminalization laws; (2) legalization of psychedelic-assisted therapy and statewide psychedelic decriminalization; (3) statewide medical cannabis use laws; (4) statewide recreational cannabis use laws; and (5) all cannabis and psychedelic use restricted.
    UNASSIGNED: Microdosing searches per 10 million Google queries were measured, examining annual and monthly changes in search rates across the US, including frequency and nature of related searches.
    UNASSIGNED: Searches for microdosing in the US remained stable until 2014, then increased annually thereafter, with a cumulative increase by a factor of 13.4 from 2015 to 2023 (7.9 per 10 million to 105.6 per 10 million searches, respectively). In 2023, there were 3.0 million microdosing searches in the US. Analysis at the state level revealed that local psychedelic decriminalization laws were associated with an increase in search rates by 22.4 per 10 million (95% CI, 7.5-37.2), statewide psychedelic therapeutic legalization and decriminalization were associated with an increase in search rates by 28.9 per 10 million (95% CI, 16.5-41.2), statewide recreational cannabis laws were associated with an increase in search rates by 40.9 per 10 million (95% CI, 28.6-53.3), and statewide medical cannabis laws were associated with an increase in search rates by 11.5 per 10 million (95% CI, 6.0-16.9). From August through December 2023, 27.0% of the variation in monthly microdosing search rates between states was explained by differences in cannabis and psychedelics legal status.
    UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study found that state-led legislative reforms on cannabis and psychedelics were associated with increased public interest in microdosing psychedelics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经典迷幻药和MDMA有丰富多彩的娱乐使用历史,两者最近都被重新评估为治疗精神疾病的工具。已经进行了几项研究来评估定期使用对认知的潜在长期影响,为迷幻药和摇头丸提供不同的结果。然而,迄今为止,在这些物质的急性影响期间,关于认知表现的知识很少。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们研究了在急性药物作用和亚急性("余辉")窗口期间,迷幻药和MDMA对认知功能的影响.我们的定量分析表明,与MDMA相比,迷幻药会对急性认知表现产生不同的影响:迷幻药会损害注意力和执行功能,而MDMA主要影响记忆,让执行功能和注意力不受影响。我们的定性分析表明,在迷幻药的急性作用消退后至少24小时内,执行功能和创造力可能会增加,而MDMA没有观察到这样的结果。我们的发现可能有助于为娱乐环境提供减少伤害的建议,并有助于在治疗框架内促进使用迷幻药和MDMA的不同方法。
    Classic psychedelics and MDMA have a colorful history of recreational use, and both have recently been re-evaluated as tools for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Several studies have been carried out to assess potential long-term effects of a regular use on cognition, delivering distinct results for psychedelics and MDMA. However, to date knowledge is scarce on cognitive performance during acute effects of those substances. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigate how cognitive functioning is affected by psychedelics and MDMA during the acute drug effects and the sub-acute (\"afterglow\") window. Our quantitative analyses suggest that acute cognitive performance is differentially affected by psychedelics when compared to MDMA: psychedelics impair attention and executive function, whereas MDMA primarily affects memory, leaving executive functions and attention unaffected. Our qualitative analyses reveal that executive functioning and creativity may be increased during a window of at least 24 h after the acute effects of psychedelics have subsided, whereas no such results have been observed for MDMA. Our findings may contribute to inform recommendations on harm reduction for recreational settings and to help fostering differential approaches for the use of psychedelics and MDMA within a therapeutic framework.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是一个悖论,精神模拟药物可以缓解症状,增加风险和并发精神病,如注意力和动机缺陷(例如,安非他明),疼痛(例如,大麻)和抑郁症状(例如,迷幻药,分离)。我们引入了精神拟态补偿和精神拟态敏化的思想来解释这一悖论。精神模拟补偿是指通过神经递质/调节剂系统(内源性大麻素,血清素能,谷氨酸能和多巴胺能)介导常见拟精神药物的作用。在反复暴露于压力和/或药物后发生精神拟态致敏,并且随着时间的推移,精神病样经历的逐渐加剧和增加证明了这一点。讨论了该模型的理论和实践意义。
    It is a paradox that psychotomimetic drugs can relieve symptoms that increase risk of and cooccur with psychosis, such as attention and motivational deficits (e.g., amphetamines), pain (e.g., cannabis) and symptoms of depression (e.g., psychedelics, dissociatives). We introduce the ideas of psychotomimetic compensation and psychotomimetic sensitization to explain this paradox. Psychotomimetic compensation refers to a short-term stressor or drug-induced compensation against stress that is facilitated by engagement of neurotransmitter/modulator systems (endocannabinoid, serotonergic, glutamatergic and dopaminergic) that mediate the effects of common psychotomimetic drugs. Psychotomimetic sensitization occurs after repeated exposure to stress and/or drugs and is evidenced by the gradual intensification and increase of psychotic-like experiences over time. Theoretical and practical implications of this model are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癫痫发作是一种经常与使用迷幻药有关的不良事件,因此,涉及这些物质的研究倾向于排除既往有癫痫史的患者.这一点尤其重要,因为癫痫发作在患有精神疾病的人群中明显增加,迷幻辅助疗法正在研究中,作为一种有希望的治疗方法。为了确定当前有关经典迷幻药与癫痫发作之间关系的文献的范围,使用PRISMA-ScR(系统评价的首选报告项目和范围审查的Meta分析扩展)进行范围审查。搜索是在PubMed中进行的,WebofScience,谷歌学者,LILACS和Scielo,并包括动物和人体模型。共有16篇关于人类的出版物,11关于动物,被发现了。结果是异质的,但在全球范围内表明,在没有其他药物的情况下,迷幻药可能不会增加健康个体或动物的癫痫发作风险。然而,同时使用其他物质或药物,例如kambo或锂,可能会增加癫痫发作的风险。此外,这些结论是从缺乏足够外部有效性的数据中得出的,所以他们应该谨慎解释。还提供了未来的研究路径以及可能阐明经典迷幻药与癫痫发作之间关系的神经生物学基础的总结。
    Seizures are a concerning adverse event frequently associated with the use of psychedelics, and hence, studies involving these substances tend to exclude patients with past history of epilepsy. This is especially relevant because epileptic seizures are markedly increased in the population suffering from mental disorders, and psychedelic assisted therapy is being researched as a promising treatment for several of them. To determine the extent of the current literature on the relationship between classic psychedelics and seizures, a scoping review was performed using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews). The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google scholar, LILACS and Scielo, and both animal and human models were included. A total of 16 publications on humans, and 11 on animals, were found. The results are heterogeneous, but globally suggest that psychedelics may not increase the risk of seizures in healthy individuals or animals in the absence of other drugs. However, concomitant use of other substances or drugs, such as kambo or lithium, could increase the risk of seizures. Additionally, these conclusions are drawn from data lacking sufficient external validity, so they should be interpreted with caution. Future paths for research and a summary on possible neurobiological underpinnings that might clarify the relationship between classical psychedelics and seizures are also provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为致幻药物类别的共同特征,功能网络中功能连通性(FC)的变化程度尚未得到充分探索。这项工作利用功能磁共振成像来评估解离性致幻剂Psilocybin,经典的血清素迷幻药,和Salvinorin-A,κ阿片受体(KOR)激动剂,关于非人灵长类动物的静息状态FC。我们强调这些物质相对于丘脑对FC的重叠和不同影响,claustrum,前额叶皮质(PFC),默认模式网络(DMN),和DMN子组件。分析是在受试者内部进行的。研究结果支持皮质-claustro-皮质网络模型,用于探测致幻剂的功能作用,无论血清素能潜能如何,一个潜在的关键范式围绕着claustrum,PFC,前扣带回皮质(ACC),和角回的关系.Thalamo-皮层网络有牵连,但似乎依赖于5-HT2AR激活。还显示了两种药物相对于DMN的急性去同步。我们的发现提供了一个框架,以了解更广泛的机制,无论目标受体如何,不同类别的致幻剂都可能影响受试者。
    The extent of changes in functional connectivity (FC) within functional networks as a common feature across hallucinogenic drug classes is under-explored. This work utilized fMRI to assess the dissociative hallucinogens Psilocybin, a classical serotonergic psychedelic, and Salvinorin-A, a kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist, on resting-state FC in nonhuman primates. We highlight overlapping and differing influence of these substances on FC relative to the thalamus, claustrum, prefrontal cortex (PFC), default mode network (DMN), and DMN subcomponents. Analysis was conducted on a within-subject basis. Findings support the cortico-claustro-cortical network model for probing functional effects of hallucinogens regardless of serotonergic potential, with a potential key paradigm centered around the claustrum, PFC, anterior cingulate cortices (ACC), and angular gyrus relationship. Thalamo-cortical networks are implicated but appear dependent on 5-HT2AR activation. Acute desynchronization relative to the DMN for both drugs was also shown. Our findings provide a framework to understand broader mechanisms at which hallucinogens in differing classes may impact subjects regardless of the target receptor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迷幻药在积极的临床效果后经历了新的兴趣,然而,潜在效应的神经生物学机制仍不清楚.下丘脑室旁核(PVN)在应激反应中起着不可或缺的作用,自主神经功能,社会行为,和其他情感过程。我们研究了psilocin的作用,psilocybin的精神活性代谢产物,SpragueDawley大鼠PVN反应性的研究。通过c-Fos表达在雄性和雌性大鼠中测量,Psilocin增加了不依赖刺激的PVN活性。Psilocin增加了男性而不是女性的PVN对厌恶性空气刺激的反应性。在注射后2天和7天恢复反应性,没有组差异。此外,先前注射psilocin不会影响急性束缚应激后的PVN反应性。通过基线威胁响应进行分类的实验组表明,男性PVN反应性的增加是由主动威胁响应者驱动的。这些发现将PVN确定为迷幻药作用的重要部位,并暗示了威胁响应行为。
    Psychedelics have experienced renewed interest following positive clinical effects, however the neurobiological mechanisms underlying effects remain unclear. The paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) plays an integral role in stress response, autonomic function, social behavior, and other affective processes. We investigated the effect of psilocin, the psychoactive metabolite of psilocybin, on PVN reactivity in Sprague Dawley rats. Psilocin increased stimulus-independent PVN activity as measured by c-Fos expression in male and female rats. Psilocin increased PVN reactivity to an aversive air-puff stimulus in males but not females. Reactivity was restored at 2- and 7-days post-injection with no group differences. Additionally, prior psilocin injection did not affect PVN reactivity following acute restraint stress. Experimental groups sub-classified by baseline threat responding indicate that increased male PVN reactivity is driven by active threat responders. These findings identify the PVN as a significant site of psychedelic drug action with implications for threat responding behavior.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近对经典迷幻药的研究表明,它们的使用与心理力量和韧性有关,从而赋予用户一种相对于非用户的心理保护。然而,最近的研究结果表明,麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)的终身使用者在紧张的经历期间报告的心理健康更差,这一观点受到了质疑.当前的研究通过检查在压力经历之前使用LSD是否可以缓冲压力经历后所经历的心理困扰来解决这些混合发现。这项研究借鉴了来自全国药物使用和健康调查(2008-2019)的公开数据,涉及5,067,553(加权)失业者,求职经历失业的个人。使用有目的的受访者排除标准来确定所调查变量的时间优先级,这项研究提供了一个简单的测试,即使用LSD是否会赋予自然使用者心理弹性。失业前使用LSD与失业后严重心理困扰的可能性更高相关,无论社会人口统计学变量是否得到控制。总之,这项研究未能找到证据证明自然主义使用者在经历紧张经历后具有LSD赋予的心理弹性.
    Recent studies on classic psychedelics have suggested that their use is associated with psychological strengths and resilience, thereby conferring users a type of psychological protection relative to non-users. However, this idea has been brought into question by recent findings suggesting that lifetime users of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) report worse mental health during stressful experiences. The current study addresses these mixed findings by examining whether LSD use prior to a stressful experience buffers against the psychological distress experienced in the wake of the stressful experience. This study draws on openly-available data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (2008-2019) on 5,067,553 (weighted) unemployed, job seeking individuals experiencing job loss. Using purposeful respondent exclusion criteria to establish temporal precedence of the variables under investigation, this study offers a straightforward test of whether LSD use confers psychological resilience to naturalistic users. LSD use prior to job loss was associated with a higher likelihood of severe psychological distress following job loss, regardless of whether sociodemographic variables were controlled for or not. In sum, this study fails to find evidence for LSD-conferred psychological resilience in naturalistic users in the wake of a stressful experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对有效治疗抑郁症的需求越来越大,特别是对于患有难治性抑郁症的个体。近年来,越来越多的兴趣集中在探索psilocybin作为抑郁症的潜在治疗方法的安全性和有效性上.然而,第二阶段研究的初步结果尚无定论,促使对诸如维持致盲和辅助心理治疗的作用等问题进行严格的检查。双盲的维持和辅助心理治疗的作用引入了偏见,使临床研究中的结论性结果复杂化。检查历史数据揭示了与使用精神活性物质有关的反复出现的模式,首先是过度乐观,最后是一般的成瘾行为和严重公共卫生问题的风险增加。考虑到这些发现,谨慎和谨慎的方法是必要的,鉴于psilocybin治疗的有效性和安全性尚未明确确定。研究人员过度乐观的可能性是一个值得注意的问题,因为毫无根据的热情可能会在没有足够经验支持的情况下无意中促进这种治疗的广泛采用。在驾驭抑郁症治疗的复杂性时,有必要在创新和审慎之间取得平衡,以确保基于证据的治疗方法的进步。
    There is an increasing demand for effective treatments for depression, particularly for individuals grappling with treatment-resistant depression. Over recent years, a surge of interest has focused on exploring the safety and efficacy of psilocybin as a potential treatment for depression. However, preliminary findings from phase 2 studies have been inconclusive, prompting critical examination of issues such as maintaining blinding and the role of adjunctive psychotherapy. The maintenance of double-blinding and the role of adjunctive psychotherapy introduce biases that complicate the attainment of conclusive results in clinical research. Examining historical data reveals a recurrent pattern linked to the use of psychoactive substances, which starts with an excess of optimism and ends with general addictive behaviors and a heightened risk of serious public health problems. Considering these findings, a cautious and measured approach is imperative, given that the efficacy and safety of psilocybin treatment have yet to be unequivocally established. The potential for excessive optimism among researchers is a notable concern, as unwarranted enthusiasm may inadvertently facilitate the widespread adoption of this treatment without sufficient empirical support. In navigating the complexities of depression treatment, it is necessary to strike a balance between innovation and prudence to ensure evidence-based advancement of therapeutic approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有人提出,迷幻药通过精神类型的转变来促进幸福,涉及形而上学信仰的变化。过去的实证研究表明,迷幻药的使用与非物理主义形而上学信念的认可之间存在联系。然而,非物理主义信仰包含了广泛的形而上学思想,它们与健康和迷幻药使用的联系仍不清楚。我们利用横断面互联网调查来探索参与者的形而上学信念(N=701)与古典迷幻药的过去经验,使用一个新颖的42项问卷(核心形而上学信仰,CMB),包含广泛的形而上学信念。CMB的因子分析揭示了两个因素,理想主义和唯物主义。在网络分析中,理想主义与过去的迷幻经历(E=0.24)和迷幻药的平均使用(E=0.16)中的心理洞察力有关,和预测的健康状况(Es=0.13和0.22)。中介分析显示,通过理想主义使用过去的迷幻药与幸福之间存在间接联系(ps≤.005)。非物理主义信仰或唯物主义不是重要的媒介。结果表明,特别是理想主义,不是一般的非物理主义信仰,调解使用迷幻药和幸福之间的联系。需要未来的研究来确定这种联系是否是因果关系,并理解理想主义因素的含义。
    It has been proposed that psychedelics promote wellbeing through spiritual-type transformations, involving changes in metaphysical beliefs. Past empirical research shows a link between the use of psychedelics and the endorsement of non-physicalist metaphysical beliefs. However, non-physicalist beliefs encompass a wide range of metaphysical ideas, and their links to wellbeing and psychedelics use remain unclear. We utilized a cross-sectional Internet survey to probe the metaphysical beliefs of participants (N = 701) with past experience of classical psychedelics, using a novel 42-item questionnaire (Core Metaphysical Beliefs, CMB), encompassing a wide range of metaphysical beliefs. Factor analysis of CMB revealed two factors, Idealism and Materialism. In network analyses, Idealism was linked to psychological insight in a past psychedelic experience (E = 0.24) and average use of psychedelics (E = 0.16), and predicted wellbeing (Es = 0.13 and 0.22). Mediation analyses showed an indirect link from past psychedelics use through Idealism to wellbeing (ps ≤ .005). Non-Physicalist Beliefs or Materialism were not significant mediators. The results indicate that Idealism specifically, not non-physicalist beliefs generally, mediate a link between the use of psychedelics and wellbeing. Future research is required to establish whether the link is causal, and to understand what the Idealism factor means.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着全球政府机构考虑批准第一批迷幻药物,关于他们融入主流医疗实践的伦理问题仍然存在许多问题。
    确定与迷幻疗法最终融入临床实践相关的关键伦理和政策问题。
    从2023年6月9日至12日,代表临床医生观点的27个人,研究人员,土著群体,工业,慈善事业,退伍军人,撤退促进者,培训计划,和生物伦理学家在冷泉港实验室的班伯里中心召集。在会议之前,与会者提交了迷幻药的关键伦理和政策问题。反应分为6大主题:研究伦理问题;管理期望和知情同意;治疗伦理;培训,教育,和从业人员的执照;公平和准入;以及把关的适当作用。在每个主题上都有相关专业知识的与会者,接下来是小组讨论。会议组织者(A.L.M.,I.G.C.,D.S.)起草了讨论和建议的摘要,注意到共识和分歧,作为一个小组进行了讨论和修订。
    这份共识声明报告了关于5个道德问题(赔偿和互惠,股本,和尊重;知情同意;专业界限和身体接触;个人经验;和把关),由相应的相关行为者负责实施。还确定了进一步研究和审议的领域。
    这份共识声明的重点是美国和国外政府批准的迷幻药的未来医疗用途。这是一个令人难以置信的激动人心和充满希望的时刻,但至关重要的是,政策制定者必须认真对待未来的挑战。
    UNASSIGNED: As government agencies around the globe contemplate approval of the first psychedelic medicines, many questions remain about their ethical integration into mainstream medical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: To identify key ethics and policy issues related to the eventual integration of psychedelic therapies into clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: From June 9 to 12, 2023, 27 individuals representing the perspectives of clinicians, researchers, Indigenous groups, industry, philanthropy, veterans, retreat facilitators, training programs, and bioethicists convened at the Banbury Center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Prior to the meeting, attendees submitted key ethics and policy issues for psychedelic medicine. Responses were categorized into 6 broad topics: research ethics issues; managing expectations and informed consent; therapeutic ethics; training, education, and licensure of practitioners; equity and access; and appropriate role of gatekeeping. Attendees with relevant expertise presented on each topic, followed by group discussion. Meeting organizers (A.L.M., I.G.C., D.S.) drafted a summary of the discussion and recommendations, noting points of consensus and disagreement, which were discussed and revised as a group.
    UNASSIGNED: This consensus statement reports 20 points of consensus across 5 ethical issues (reparations and reciprocity, equity, and respect; informed consent; professional boundaries and physical touch; personal experience; and gatekeeping), with corresponding relevant actors who will be responsible for implementation. Areas for further research and deliberation are also identified.
    UNASSIGNED: This consensus statement focuses on the future of government-approved medical use of psychedelic medicines in the US and abroad. This is an incredibly exciting and hopeful moment, but it is critical that policymakers take seriously the challenges ahead.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号