Ceftazidime-avibactam

头孢他啶 - 阿维巴坦
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药的产KPC肺炎克雷伯菌被报道,KPC变异体的检出率显著提高。然而,KPC突变过程中的进化机制和适应性效应尚不清楚.这里,我们报告了两个新的KPC变体的复杂体内进化轨迹,KPC-155(L169P/GT242A)和KPC-185(D179Y/GT242A),来自同一患者的肺炎克雷伯菌。根据质粒转化试验的结果,新的变体被证明赋予头孢他啶-阿维巴坦抗性,但恢复碳青霉烯敏感性。克隆实验,和酶动力学测量。体外竞争实验强调了携带这些KPC变体的菌株赋予的适应性优势,这可能导致这些头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药菌株的快速传播。生长曲线表明,与blaKPC-155相比,blaKPC-185在较低的阿维巴坦浓度下具有更好的生长条件,这与在体内使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦一致。此外,IS26侧翼转位单元(IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26)的复制转座也有助于blaKPC扩增和形成两个拷贝(blaKPC-2和blaKPC-185),同时赋予碳青霉烯类和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦抗性。然而,具有双拷贝的菌株显示出降低的竞争优势和构型稳定性。IS26组(IS26-blaKPC-IS26)和Tn1721组(Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26)的比较质粒分析显示,IS26插入可能会影响抗性基因的分布和自结合能力。blaKPC构型的动态变化突出表明需要在临床治疗期间进行一致的监测,包括抗菌药物敏感性测试和确定blaKPC亚型。尤其是服用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦时。
    More and more ceftazidime-avibactam resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae have been reported with its widespread use, and the detection rate of KPC variants has increased dramatically. However, the evolutionary mechanism and fitness effects during KPC mutation remained unknown. Here, we report the complex in vivo evolutionary trajectories of two novel KPC variants, KPC-155 (L169P/GT242A) and KPC-185 (D179Y/GT242A), from Klebsiella pneumoniae in the same patient. The novel variants were shown to confer ceftazidime-avibactam resistance but restore carbapenem susceptibility based on the results of plasmid transformation assays, cloning experiments, and enzyme kinetic measurements. In vitro competition experiments highlighted the adaptive advantage conferred by strains carrying these KPC variants, which could lead to the rapid spread of these ceftazidime-avibactam resistant strains. The growth curve indicated that blaKPC-185 had better growth conditions at lower avibactam concentration compared to blaKPC-155, which was consistent with ceftazidime-avibactam use in vivo. In addition, replicative transposition of the IS26-flanked translocatable unit (IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26) also contributes to the blaKPC amplification and formation of two copies (blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-185), conferring both carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. However, strains with double copies showed reduced competitive advantage and configuration stability. The comparative plasmid analysis of IS26 group (IS26-blaKPC-IS26) and Tn1721 group (Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26) revealed that IS26-insertion could influence the distribution of resistance genes and ability of self-conjugation. The dynamic changes in blaKPC configuration highlight the need for consistent monitoring including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of blaKPC subtypes-during clinical treatment, especially when ceftazidime-avibactam is administered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了监测耐药率并更深入地了解耐药机制,我们在教学医院进行了为期2年的监测,重点关注与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)临床使用相关的肺炎克雷伯菌.共筛选了4,641株肺炎克雷伯菌,通过药敏试验鉴定CZA耐药性。综合分析,包括同源性分析,共轭实验,克隆试验,和全基因组测序,进一步对CZA抗性菌株进行了研究。总的来说,从4名患者中分离出4株CZA耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(CZA-R-Kp),其中三人在住院期间接受了CZA治疗,占CZA应激下肺炎克雷伯菌抗性发展率的4%(3/75)。发现所有CZA-R-Kp分离株都具有blaKPC-2的变体。鉴定的突变包括blaKPC-33、blaKPC-86和命名为blaKPC-129的新变体,所有这些都位于KPC酶的Ω环中。发现这些突变会影响酶活性中心的氨基酸序列和空间结构,从而影响KPC碳青霉烯酶活性。这项研究强调了主动监测对CZA耐药性出现的重要性,强调需要正在进行的研究,以制定有效的策略来对抗抗菌素耐药性。了解耐药背后的机制对于维持CZA的疗效至关重要,对抗多重耐药感染的重要工具。重要作为治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌的有效药物,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)近年来开始产生耐药性,并呈增加趋势。为了有效监测CZA的耐药率,了解其耐药机制,我们监测肺炎克雷伯菌超过2年,以发现CZA耐药菌株。通过对筛选出的CZA耐药菌株的综合分析,发现所有CZA抗性菌株都有突变,这可能会影响KPC碳青霉烯酶的活性。这项研究强调了主动监测对监测CZA耐药性出现的重要性。这凸显了正在进行的研究以制定有效的策略来对抗抗菌素耐药性的必要性。了解抵抗背后的机制对于保持CZA的有效性至关重要,对抗多重耐药感染的重要工具。
    To monitor the resistance rate and gain a deeper understanding of the resistance mechanisms, we conducted over a 2-year surveillance focusing on the Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with the clinical usage of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in a teaching hospital. A total of 4,641 K. pneumoniae isolates were screened to identify the CZA resistance through antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Comprehensive analyses, including homology analysis, conjugation experiments, clone assays, and whole genome sequencing, were furtherly performed on the CZA-resistant strains. In total, four CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae (CZA-R-Kp) strains were separated from four patients, in which three of them received CZA treatment during the hospitalization, accounting for a 4% (3/75) resistance development rate of K. pneumoniae under CZA stress. All CZA-R-Kp isolates were found to possess variants of blaKPC-2. The identified mutations included blaKPC-33, blaKPC-86, and a novel variant designated as blaKPC-129, all of which were located in the Ω loop of the KPC enzyme. These mutations were found to impact the amino acid sequence and spatial structure of the enzyme\'s active center, consequently affecting KPC carbapenemase activity. This study underscores the importance of active surveillance to monitor the emergence of resistance to CZA, highlighting the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies for combating antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is crucial in maintaining the efficacy of CZA, a vital tool in the battle against multidrug-resistant infections.IMPORTANCEAs an effective drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) began to develop resistance in recent years and showed an increasing trend. In order to effectively monitor the resistance rate of CZA and understand its resistance mechanism, we monitored K. pneumoniae for more than 2 years to find CZA-resistant strains. Through comprehensive analysis of the selected CZA-resistant strains, it was found that all the CZA-resistant strains had mutation, which could affect the activity of KPC carbapenemase. This study highlights the importance of proactive surveillance to monitor the emergence of CZA resistance, which highlights the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is critical to maintaining the effectiveness of CZA, an important tool in the fight against multidrug-resistant infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是产生碳青霉烯酶A类(尤其是blaKPC)和D类(blaOXA)的革兰氏阴性杆菌感染的良好选择。然而,尚不清楚它是否会对金属β-内酰胺酶(blaMBL)的选择产生影响。该研究的目的是在引入CZA后的两年内比较碳青霉烯和CZA肺炎克雷伯菌(KPN)的敏感性。
    方法:这项研究是在布宜诺斯艾利斯一家三级医院的36张病床的成人ICU中进行的,阿根廷。抗微生物剂消耗量表示为每100名患者的治疗天数-天(DOT)。
    结果:共分析了第一年的123株KPN菌株和第二年的172株。第二年检测到碳青霉烯敏感性的惊人下降(OR0.5[0.3-0.8]p<.001)。并行,CZA易感性降低(OR0.5[0.3-0.9]p<.05)。这些发现与blaMBL-KPN的上升有关(32.1%与45.1%,或1.7[1.1-2.9],p<.04)第二年。这种新的KPN敏感性曲线促进了CZA的增加(1.0DOT与6.6DOT,OR6.6[4.9-9.1]p<.001)和氨曲南(0.3DOTvs.4.1DOT,或16.3[9.1-29.3]p<.001)消费。因此,碳青霉烯类处方药减少(17.8DOTvs.15.4DOT,或0.8[0.8-0.9]p<.001)。
    结论:在CZA引入两年后,blaMBL-KPN率上升,导致CZA和碳青霉烯敏感性降低,CZA和氨曲南处方增加。
    OBJECTIVE: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a good option for Gram-negative bacilli infections that produce carbapenemase Classes A (especially blaKPC) and D (blaOXA). However, it is unknown whether it would have an impact on metallo-β-lactamases (blaMBL) selection. The aim of the study was to compare carbapenem and CZA Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPN) susceptibility profiles for a period of two years following the introduction of CZA.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in a 36-bed adult ICU of a tertiary hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Antimicrobial consumption was expressed as days of treatment per 100 patients-day (DOT).
    RESULTS: A total of 123 KPN strains in the first year and 172 in the second year were analyzed. An alarming decrease in carbapenem susceptibility was detected in the second year (OR 0.5 [0.3-0.8] p<.001). In parallel, there was a decrease in CZA susceptibility (OR 0.5 [0.3-0.9] p<.05). These findings were linked to a rise in blaMBL-KPN (32.1% vs. 45.1%, OR 1.7 [1.1-2.9], p <.04) during the second year. This new KPN susceptibility profile promoted an increment in CZA (1.0 DOT vs. 6.6 DOT, OR 6.6 [4.9-9.1] p<.001) and aztreonam (0.3 DOT vs. 4.1 DOT, OR 16.3 [9.1-29.3] p<.001) consumption. Thus, there was a decrease in carbapenem prescription (17.8 DOT vs. 15.4 DOT, OR 0.8 [0.8-0.9] p<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: There was an escalation of blaMBL-KPN rate two years after CZA introduction, leading to a decrease in CZA and carbapenem susceptibility and an increase in CZA and aztreonam prescriptions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新的β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合代表了治疗由多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染的最后手段抗生素。碳青霉烯酶基因的获取会限制其活性谱,对这些新分子的抗性的报道也在增加。在这项多中心研究中,我们评估了来自血流感染的铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)和比较物的耐药率,医院获得性肺炎或呼吸机相关性肺炎,尿路感染,在意大利南部流通。我们还研究了CZA抗性(CZAR)分离株的相关β-内酰胺抗性机制的克隆性和含量。收集总共120个铜绿假单胞菌分离物。CZA是最活跃的β-内酰胺类,在81.7%的病例中保留易感性,之前是头孢地洛洛尔(95.8%),其次是头孢洛赞-他唑巴坦(79.2%),美罗培南-伐巴坦(76.1%),亚胺培南-莱巴坦(75%),和氨曲南(69.6%)。在非β-内酰胺中,粘菌素和阿米卡星分别对100%和85.8%的分离株具有活性。在进行全基因组测序的CZAR菌株中(n=18),抗性主要是由于金属-β-内酰胺酶的表达(66.6%VIM型和5.5%FIM-1),其次是PER-1(16.6%)和GES-1(5.5%)超广谱β-内酰胺酶,主要由国际高风险克隆(ST111和ST235)携带。值得注意的是,两株产生PER-1酶的菌株对所有β-内酰胺都有抗性,包括头孢得洛.总之,意大利南部铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的CZA耐药率仍然很低。CZAR分离株主要是金属β-内酰胺酶生产者,属于ST111和ST253流行病克隆。重要的是实施强大的监测系统以监测新的抗性机制的出现并限制铜绿假单胞菌高风险克隆的传播。
    目的:多药耐药的铜绿假单胞菌感染是一个日益严重的威胁,由于有限的治疗选择。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是治疗难以治疗的铜绿假单胞菌感染的最后手段抗生素,尽管由于获得可转移的β-内酰胺酶基因而产生的抗性正在增加。有了这项工作,我们报告说,CZA代表一种高活性的反假子β-内酰胺化合物(头孢地洛之后),金属β-内酰胺酶(VIM型)和广谱β-内酰胺酶(GES和PER型)的产生是意大利南部医院分离株对CZA耐药的主要因素。此外,我们报道,此类抗性机制主要由国际高危克隆ST111和ST235携带.
    New β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations represent last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Carbapenemase gene acquisition can limit their spectrum of activity, and reports of resistance toward these new molecules are increasing. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and comparators among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from bloodstream infections, hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, and urinary tract infections, circulating in Southern Italy. We also investigated the clonality and content of relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms of CZA-resistant (CZAR) isolates. A total of 120 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected. CZA was among the most active β-lactams, retaining susceptibility in the 81.7% of cases, preceded by cefiderocol (95.8%) and followed by ceftolozane-tazobactam (79.2%), meropenem-vaborbactam (76.1%), imipenem-relebactam (75%), and aztreonam (69.6%). Among non-β-lactams, colistin and amikacin were active against 100% and 85.8% of isolates respectively. In CZAR strains subjected to whole-genome sequencing (n = 18), resistance was mainly due to the expression of metallo-β-lactamases (66.6% VIM-type and 5.5% FIM-1), followed by PER-1 (16.6%) and GES-1 (5.5%) extended-spectrum β-lactamases, mostly carried by international high-risk clones (ST111 and ST235). Of note, two strains producing the PER-1 enzyme were resistant to all β-lactams, including cefiderocol. In conclusion, the CZA resistance rate among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in Southern Italy remained low. CZAR isolates were mostly metallo-β-lactamases producers and belonging to ST111 and ST253 epidemic clones. It is important to implement robust surveillance systems to monitor emergence of new resistance mechanisms and to limit the spread of P. aeruginosa high-risk clones.
    OBJECTIVE: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a growing threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is among the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections, although resistance due to the acquisition of transferable β-lactamase genes is increasing. With this work, we report that CZA represents a highly active antipseudomonal β-lactam compound (after cefiderocol), and that metallo-β-lactamases (VIM-type) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (GES and PER-type) production is the major factor underlying CZA resistance in isolates from Southern Italian hospitals. In addition, we reported that such resistance mechanisms were mainly carried by the international high-risk clones ST111 and ST235.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染是全球公共卫生的巨大威胁。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是一种有效的抗CRKP的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂。然而,对CZA的抗性报告,主要由肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)变异体引起,近年来有所增加。在这项研究中,我们的目的是描述KPC-12的耐药特征,这是一种从CZA耐药肺炎克雷伯菌中鉴定出的新型KPC变异体.
    从呼吸道感染患者收集的肺炎克雷伯菌YFKP-97在IlluminaNovaSeq6000平台上进行了全基因组测序(WGS)。使用生物信息学方法分析基因组特征。通过肉汤微量稀释法进行抗菌药敏感性测试。如前所述在体外进行抗性菌株的诱导。采用G.mellonella杀灭试验评价菌株的致病性,并进行接合实验以评估质粒转移能力。
    菌株YFKP-97是一种多重耐药的临床ST11-KL47肺炎克雷伯菌,对CZA(16/4μg/mL)具有高度耐药性。WGS透露,KPC变体,KPC-12由IncFII(pHN7A8)质粒(pYFKP-97_a和pYFKP-97_b)携带,对碳青霉烯类抗生素的活性显着降低。此外,blaKPC-12对其对头孢他啶的活性具有剂量依赖性作用.体外诱导型抗性测定结果表明,KPC-12变体比KPC-2和KPC-3变体更可能赋予对CZA的抗性。
    我们的研究表明,未接受CZA治疗的患者也可能感染具有新型KPC变体的CZA抗性菌株。鉴于携带blaKPC-12的转化体更可能表现出CZA抗性表型。因此,尽早准确识别KPC变异非常重要.
    UNASSIGNED: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a great threat to public health worldwide. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is an effective β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors against CRKP. However, reports of resistance to CZA, mainly caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants, have increased in recent years. In this study, we aimed to describe the resistance characteristics of KPC-12, a novel KPC variant identified from a CZA resistant K. pneumoniae.
    UNASSIGNED: The K. pneumoniae YFKP-97 collected from a patient with respiratory tract infection was performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Genomic characteristics were analyzed using bioinformatics methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by the broth microdilution method. Induction of resistant strain was carried out in vitro as previously described. The G. mellonella killing assay was used to evaluate the pathogenicity of strains, and the conjugation experiment was performed to evaluate plasmid transfer ability.
    UNASSIGNED: Strain YFKP-97 was a multidrug-resistant clinical ST11-KL47 K. pneumoniae confers high-level resistance to CZA (16/4 μg/mL). WGS revealed that a KPC variant, KPC-12, was carried by the IncFII (pHN7A8) plasmids (pYFKP-97_a and pYFKP-97_b) and showed significantly decreased activity against carbapenems. In addition, there was a dose-dependent effect of bla KPC-12 on its activity against ceftazidime. In vitro inducible resistance assay results demonstrated that the KPC-12 variant was more likely to confer resistance to CZA than the KPC-2 and KPC-3 variants.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed that patients who was not treated with CZA are also possible to be infected with CZA-resistant strains harbored a novel KPC variant. Given that the transformant carrying bla KPC-12 was more likely to exhibit a CZA-resistance phenotype. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify the KPC variants as early as possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)是可用于治疗碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌(CRB)感染的新型抗生素之一。我们的目的是描述CAZ-AVI在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院的儿童中的使用,怀疑或证实CRB感染。
    方法:在里约热内卢的两个PICU中进行了回顾性描述性研究,巴西,2020年1月至2024年1月。包括接受CAZ-AVI超过24小时的0至18岁儿童。
    结果:37例患者使用CAZ-AVI。中位年龄为28个月(范围1-215),男性17人(45.9%)。从患者入院到CAZ-AVI的初始处方的中位时间为39.9天(范围1-138)。34(91.9%)儿童在入院时至少有一种合并症,并且(91.9%)在CAZ-AVI处方之前使用了至少一种侵入性设备,89.2%的患者之前曾接受过碳青霉烯;15例(40.5%)患者在使用CAZ-AVI之前曾接受过医疗保健相关感染(HAI)。CAZ-AVI的平均使用时间为11天(范围1-22)。在处方前24小时或处方当天,从12名(32.4%)患者的培养物中分离出革兰氏阴性细菌。在五名患者中,CRB在文化中得到证实,在其中四个(80%)中,治疗7天后验证微生物清除。30天死亡率为37.8%。
    结论:几乎所有使用CAZ-AVI的患者都是患有多种合并症且既往使用过碳青霉烯类抗生素的危重患儿。在CRB确认的感染中,7天内微生物学清除率高。
    BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is one of the new antibiotics available to treat infections due to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRB). Our aim was to describe the use of CAZ-AVI in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), with suspected or proven CRB infections.
    METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in two PICUs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between January 2020 and January 2024. Children aged 0 to 18 years who received CAZ-AVI for more than 24 h were included.
    RESULTS: CAZ-AVI was used in 37 patients. The median age was 28 months (range 1-215), 17 (45.9%) being male. The median time from the patient admission to the initial prescription of CAZ-AVI was 39.9 days (range 1-138). Thirty-four (91.9%) children had at least one comorbidity at admission and (91.9%) used at least one invasive device prior to the CAZ-AVI prescription, and 89.2% had received carbapenem before; and fifteen (40.5%) had healthcare-associated infection (HAI) prior to CAZ-AVI use. The mean time of CAZ-AVI use was 11 days (range 1-22). Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in cultures from 12 (32.4%) patients in the 24 h prior to prescription or on the day of prescription. In five patients, CRB was confirmed in cultures, and in four (80%) of them, microbiological clearance was verified after 7 days of treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 37.8%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients who used CAZ-AVI were critically ill children with multiple comorbidities and previous use of carbapenems. Among CRB confirmed infections, microbiology clearance in 7 days was high.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:产生碳青霉烯酶的肺炎克雷伯菌(CP-KP)对公共卫生构成全球威胁,有限的抗菌治疗选择。在这项研究中,我们分析了从一名患者中获得的头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)耐药肺炎克雷伯菌分离株,该患者先前暴露于表达新型肺炎克雷伯酶(KPC)-3变异体的CAZ-AVI.
    方法:使用参考肉汤微量稀释进行抗菌药物敏感性试验。使用Illumina和纳米孔技术进行全基因组测序(WGS)。短读段和长读段与Unicycler组合。研究了组装的多位点序列分型(MLST),抗菌素抗性基因,孔,和质粒。
    结果:肺炎克雷伯菌分离株(KP_RM_1)对CAZ-AVI耐药,广谱头孢菌素,阿米卡星,厄他培南,和头孢地洛(FDC),但对替加环素敏感,粘菌素,甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑,美罗培南-瓦巴坦,还有亚胺培南-莱巴坦.WGS揭示KP_RM_1基因组由5个Mbp的单个染色体和5个环状质粒组成。进一步分析显示存在位于72kb质粒上的新型blaKPC-216。KPC-216与KPC-3的不同之处在于Lysin(K)在位置168(+K168)插入。
    结论:我们报告了与CAZ-AVI抗性相关的新KPC-3变体的鉴定。应确定与CAZ-AVI耐药性相关的KPC变体,以及时通知临床医生并开始适当的抗菌治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) represents a global threat to public health, with limited antimicrobial therapeutic options. In this study, we analyzed a ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate obtained from a patient previously exposed to CAZ-AVI expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant.
    METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using Illumina and Nanopore Technologies. Short- and long-reads were combined with Unicycler. Assemblies were investigated for multilocus sequence typing (MLST), antimicrobial resistance genes, porins, and plasmids.
    RESULTS: The K. pneumoniae isolate (KP_RM_1) was resistant to CAZ-AVI, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, ertapenem, and cefiderocol (FDC) but was susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam. WGS revealed that the KP_RM_1 genome is composed of a single chromosome of 5 Mbp and five circular plasmids. Further analysis showed the presence of novel blaKPC-216 located on a 72 kb plasmid. KPC-216 differs from KPC-3 by a Lysin (K) insertion at position 168 (+K168).
    CONCLUSIONS: We report the identification of a new KPC-3 variant associated with CAZ-AVI resistance. The KPC variants associated with CAZ-AVI resistance should be determined to promptly inform clinicians and start the appropriate antimicrobial therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述GES型碳青霉烯酶体内头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性的出现,并描述在西班牙COVID-19大流行期间产生GES-6的粘质沙雷菌的异常爆发。
    方法:回顾性研究描述了基于全基因组测序和抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST)的GES-CPSM爆发。通过接合实验评估携带blaGES的质粒的可转移性。
    结果:在2020年12月,我们确定了一组含有blaGES-6的粘质链球菌,涉及9例患者。全基因组序列分析显示,在每个进化患者中鉴定的第一批分离株与GES-CPSM检测的环境样品之间存在克隆关系(≤3个SNP)。质粒分析表明blaGES-6基因位于IncQ3型质粒中。使用辅助质粒的三亲本交配实验证明了携带blaGES-6的质粒的动员。我们的结果还证明了粘质沙氏菌分离株的宿主内进化,导致由P162S突变引起的从blaGES-6到新blaGES-55的转变,随后感染了一名受影响的患者。在blaGES-55中,我们发现了头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性的出现以及碳青霉烯类抗生素敏感性的增加。该患者接受了14天的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦疗程。携带blaGES-6和blaGES-55质粒的转化体的AST,确认影响头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和碳青霉烯类的敏感性变化。
    结论:我们报告了一次罕见的GES-6暴发,其发病率正在增加。从GES-6到GES-55的转变可能容易在体内发生,导致头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性。这使人们迫切需要开发更准确的诊断工具来检测GESβ-内酰胺酶并优化抗微生物剂的使用。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the in vivo emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in GES-type carbapenemases and to characterize an unusual outbreak of GES-6-producing Serratia marcescens during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.
    METHODS: Retrospective study to describe a GES-CPSM outbreak based on whole genome sequencing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Transferability of blaGES-carrying plasmid was assessed by conjugation experiments.
    RESULTS: In December 2020, we identified a cluster of S. marcescens harbouring blaGES-6 involving 9 patients. Whole-genome sequence analysis revealed a clonal relationship (≤3 SNPs) between the first isolates identified in each of the evolved patients and environmental samples with GES-CPSM detection. Plasmid analysis showed that the blaGES-6 gene was located in an IncQ3-type plasmid. Triparental mating experiments using a helper plasmid demonstrated mobilization of the blaGES-6-carrying plasmid. Our results also demonstrate within-host evolution in S. marcescens isolates, leading to a transition from blaGES-6 to the new blaGES-55, caused by the P162S mutation, in a subsequent infection in one of the affected patients. In blaGES-55 we identified emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance along with an increase of carbapenems susceptibility. This patient had been treated with a 14-day course of ceftazidime-avibactam. AST of the transformants bearing blaGES-6 and blaGES-55 plasmids, confirmed susceptibility variation affecting ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems.
    CONCLUSIONS: We report an unusual outbreak of GES-6 whose incidence is becoming increasing. Transition from GES-6 to GES-55 may readily occur in vivo leading to ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, which brings to the fore the critical need for developing more accurate diagnosis tools for detection of GES β-lactamases and optimise the use of antimicrobials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯的肠杆菌代表了主要的健康威胁,几乎没有批准的治疗选择。从六个欧洲国家(2020年1月1日至12月31日)的49个地点的住院患者中收集肠杆菌分离株,并对头孢地洛和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合进行了敏感性测试。通过PCR分析了耐美罗培南(MIC>8mg/L)和对头孢地洛敏感的分离株,通过全基因组测序和抗头孢霉素分离株,确定抗性机制。总的来说,1,909株(包括970个克雷伯菌属。,382大肠杆菌,和244种肠杆菌属。)被收集,通常来自血液感染(43.6%)。头孢地醇对所有肠杆菌的敏感性高于批准的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,并且与头孢吡肟-坦尼巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦相当(98.1%vs78.1%-97.4%和98.7%-99.1%,分别)和对美罗培南耐药的肠杆菌(n=148,包括125种克雷伯菌。;87.8%vs0%-71.6%和93.2%-98.6%,分别),β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(66.7%-92.1%vs0%-88.1%和66.7%-97.9%,分别),美罗培南和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(61.9%-65.9%vs0%-20.5%和76.2%-97.7%,分别)。批准和开发的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对头孢地洛耐药肠杆菌(n=37)的敏感性分别为10.8%-56.8%和78.4%-94.6%,分别。大多数耐美罗培南的肠杆菌含有肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(110/148)基因,尽管金属-β-内酰胺酶(35/148)和氧嘧啶酶(OXA)碳青霉烯酶(6/148)基因较不常见;头孢地洛敏感性保留在β-内酰胺酶生产者中,除了NDM,AMPC,和非碳青霉烯酶OXA生产者。大多数头孢地洛耐药肠杆菌具有多种耐药机制,包括≥1个铁摄取相关突变(37/37),碳青霉烯酶基因(33/37),和FTSI突变(24/37)。对头孢地洛的敏感性高于批准的β-lac+tam/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对欧洲肠杆菌的敏感性,包括美罗培南和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合耐药的分离株。
    目的:这项研究收集了大量来自欧洲的肠杆菌分离株,首次直接比较了头孢地洛和发育型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合的体外活性。高剂量美罗培南的MIC断点用于定义美罗培南耐药性,因此,在临床上可用于患者的剂量下,仍对美罗培南耐药的分离株被包括在数据中。对头孢地洛的易感性,作为单一的活性化合物,对肠杆菌的抵抗力较高,并且高于或与可用的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合相当。这些结果提供了对由于具有抗性表型的肠杆菌引起的感染的治疗选择的见解。头孢地洛与β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合平行的早期敏感性测试将允许患者及时接受最合适的治疗选择。当选项更有限时,这一点尤其重要,例如针对产生金属-β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌。
    Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-‍resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-‍97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-‍92.1% vs 0%-‍88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and β-‌lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-‍20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-‍56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-β-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in β-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved β-lac‌tam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates.
    OBJECTIVE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在连续的多药耐药铜绿假单胞菌菌血症或肺炎患者中,我们发现使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗的患者比使用头孢他啶-他唑巴坦治疗的患者更容易产生耐药性(定义为MIC增加≥4倍)(40%vs.10%;P=0.002)。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性与ampC和外排调节途径的新突变有关。
    Among consecutive patients with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia or pneumonia we found those treated with ceftazidime-avibactam were more likely to develop resistance (defined as ≥4-fold increased MIC) than those treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam (40% vs. 10%; P=0.002). Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance was associated with new mutations in ampC and efflux regulatory pathways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号