Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a significant public health concern. CRE could be carbapenamse producers or non-producers. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, bla OXA-48 and bla NDM represent the majority of carbapenemase isolates. There are very limited treatment options for carbapenemase-producing CRE caused by bla NDM. Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam (CZA-ATM) or cefiderocol as monotherapy are considered the treatment of choice for these infections. Here, we report a case of a 70-year-old man presented with surgical site infection of above knee amputation stump. The cultures revealed carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae positive for bla NDM and bla OXA-48 resistant to CZA-ATM therapy and intermediate susceptibility to tigecycline. He was started on CZA-ATM both adjusted for renal function, and high dose tigecycline with daily wound dressing and irrigation. By day 20 of the antibiotic regimens, he had clinical and microbiological cure based on repeated wound cultures. This case identifies a rare incidence of CRE skin and soft tissue infection positive for bla NDM and bla OXA-48 resistant to CZA-ATM in a background of limited targeted options, but successfully treated with CZA-ATM and high-dose tigecycline. Such therapeutic approach might be useful in few circumstances when no other antibiotic options are available to treat extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Carbapenem resistance due to metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) is a global phenomenon and an important challenge for antibiotic therapy (Boyd et al., 2020 [1]). While previous reports have demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo synergy using the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, an MBL-harboring organism, this treatment strategy has not been reported during pregnancy (Mojic et al., 2017 [2], [3], Mojica et al., 2016 [4], Alexander et al., 2020 [5]). We describe a 33-year-old pregnant female with polymicrobial, bilateral pyelonephritis caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and other gram-negative bacteria. The organisms were eradicated with the combination of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam followed by successful delivery with no observed adverse effects in either mother or child post-partum.

Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel cephalosporin/B-lactamase inhibitor developed in the context of increasing resistance. This case reports the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime-avibactam in a critically ill child under continuous renal replacement (CRRT) therapy for fluid overload. The patient was a 6-month-old female with sepsis due to bloodstream infection to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia following stem cell transplantation for severe combined immunodeficiency. CRRT was started on Day 2. Concentrations have been monitored using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Treatment was given every 8 h with a 2 h infusion of 30-7,5 mg/kg and did not reach pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. Total clearance was respectively 1.7 and 3.02 L/h, with CRRT clearance respectively 28.8%-60% for ceftazidime and 14%-33% for avibactam. Those clearances are higher than reported in adult literature leading to a risk of treatment failure and emerging resistance. This supports the benefit of monitoring antimicrobial therapy under CRRT and the necessity to assess higher dosing or continuous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam.

To describe the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of a 2 h infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in critically ill patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC). A retrospective review of all critically ill patients with ARC who were treated with CAZ-AVI between August 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients whose 12-h creatinine clearance prior to CAZ-AVI treatment and steady-state concentration (Css) of CAZ-AVI were both monitored were enrolled. The free fraction (fCss) of CAZ-AVI was calculated from Css. The joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI were considered optimal when a Css/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio for CAZ ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT > 4 MIC) and a Css/CT ratio of AVI >1 (equivalent to 100% fT > CT 4.0 mg/L) were reached simultaneously, quasioptimal when only one of the two targets was reached, and suboptimal when neither target was reached. The relationship between PK/PD goal achievement, microbial eradication and the clinical efficacy of CAZ-AVI was evaluated. Four patients were included. Only one patient achieved optimal joint PK/PD targets, while the other three reached suboptimal targets. The patient with optimal PK/PD targets achieved microbiological eradication, while the other three patients did not, but all four patients achieved good clinical efficacy. Standard dosages may not enable most critically ill patients with ARC to reach the optimal joint PK/PD targets of CAZ-AVI. Optimal drug dose adjustment of CAZ-AVI in ARC patients requires dynamic drug concentration monitoring.

Among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, metallo-beta-lactamase producing strains represent a growing therapeutic challenge. While the association of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam has been investigated in recent years for the treatment of infections involving these strains, little to no clinical data support the use of this association for the treatment of bone and joint infections. We report two cases of complex bone and joint infections involving metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, successfully treated at our referral center with aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam for 12 weeks in continuous infusions through elastomeric infusors.

To explore pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam for treating difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative (DTR-GN) infections in critical patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).
Patients treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam for DTR-GN infections during CVVHDF were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured at steady-state and the free fraction (fCss) was calculated. Total clearance (CLtot) of both agents were calculated and the impact of CVVHDF intensity was assessed by linear regression. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime-avibactam was defined as optimal when both fCss/MIC≥4 for ceftazidime and fCss/CT > 1 for avibactam were achieved. Relationship between ceftazidime-avibactam PK/PD targets and microbiological outcome was assessed.
Eight patients with DTR-GN infections were retrieved. Median fCss were 84.5 (73.7-87.7 mg/L) for ceftazidime and 24.8 mg/L (20.7-25.8 mg/L) for avibactam. Median CLtot was 2.39 L/h (2.05-2.96 L/h) for ceftazidime and 2.56 L/h (2.12-2.98 L/h) for avibactam. Median CVVHDF dose was 38.6 mL/h/kg (35.9-40.0 mL/kg/h). CLtot were linearly correlated with CVVHDF dose (r = 0.53;p = 0.03, and r = 0.64;p = 0.006, respectively). The joint PK/PD targets were optimal granting microbiological eradication in all the assessable cases.
CI administration of 1.25-2.5 g q8h ceftazidime-avibactam may allow prompt attainment and maintenance of optimal joint PK/PD targets during high-intensity CVVHDF.

Objectives: To perform a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analysis of continuous-infusion (CI) fosfomycin combined with extended-infusion (EI) cefiderocol or CI ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of severe difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) infections. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients who were treated with CI fosfomycin plus EI cefiderocol or CI ceftazidime-avibactam for severe DTR-PA infections and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), from 1 September 2021 to 30 June 2022 was performed. Concentrations were measured at steady-state (Css) for CI fosfomycin and ceftazidime-avibactam and at trough (Cmin) for EI cefiderocol. Joint PK/PD targets of combination therapy were analyzed (thresholds: area-under-the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC/MIC) ratio > 40.8 for fosfomycin; ceftazidime Css/MIC ratio ≥ 4 coupled with avibactam Css > 4 mg/L for ceftazidime-avibactam; Cmin/MIC ratio ≥ 4 for cefiderocol). Joint PK/PD targets of the combination therapy were analyzed and defined as optimal when both were achieved, quasi-optimal if only one of the two was achieved, and suboptimal if none of the two was achieved). The relationship between joint PK/PD target attainment and microbiological response was assessed. Results: Six patients (three pneumonia, two BSI + pneumonia, and one BSI) were included. The joint PK/PD targets were optimal in four cases and quasi-optimal in the other two. Microbiological eradication (ME) occurred in 4/4 of patients with optimal joint PK/PD targets and in one of the two patients with quasi-optimal joint PK/PD targets. Conclusions: Attaining optimal joint PK/PD targets with a combo-therapy of CI fosfomycin plus EI cefiderocol or CI ceftazidime-avibactam could represent an effective strategy for granting favorable microbiological outcomes in patients with DTR-PA pneumonia and/or BSI.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) behaviour of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam and the microbiological outcome in a case series of critically ill renal patients treated for documented carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative (CR-GN) bloodstream infections (BSI) and/or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).
METHODS: Critically ill patients with different degrees of renal function who were treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam for documented CR-GN infections, and who underwent therapeutic drug monitoring from April 2021 to March 2022, were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were determined at steady-state, and the free fraction (fCss) was calculated. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime-avibactam was considered as optimal when both Css/MIC ratio for ceftazidime ≥4 (equivalent to 100%fT>4xMIC) and Css/CT ratio for avibactam >1 (equivalent to 100% fT>CT of 4.0 mg/L) were simultaneously achieved (quasi-optimal if only one of the two was achieved, and suboptimal if neither of the two was achieved). The relationship between ceftazidime-avibactam PK/PD targets and microbiological outcome was assessed.
RESULTS: Ten patients with documented CR-GN infections (5 BSIs, 4 VAP, 1 BSI+VAP) were retrieved. The joint PK/PD targets of ceftazidime-avibactam were optimal and quasi-optimal in eight and two cases, respectively. Microbiological failure occurred in two patients (one with VAP, one with BSI+VAP), one of whom developed ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. Both underwent renal replacement therapy, and failed despite attaining optimal joint PK/PD target and receiving fosfomycin co-treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: CI administration may enable optimal joint PK/PD targets of ceftazidime-avibactam to be achieved in most critical renal patients with CR-GN infections, and may help to minimize the risk of microbiological failure.

暂无摘要。

PurposeThe emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is a major public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) provides a new option for treating infections caused by most beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria in infants older than three months. However, treatment options are extremely limited, with no safety data available for preterm neonates. Here, we describe our experience regarding the safety and efficacy of off-label use of CAZ-AVI in a NICU in Brazil. Summary: We report a case of a premature infant (born at 29 weeks gestational age) treated with CAZ-AVI due to a bloodstream infection caused by MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae. Conclusion: Treatment with CAZ-AVI was safe and effective in our patient.