Ceftazidime-avibactam

头孢他啶 - 阿维巴坦
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)引起了重大的公共卫生问题。CRE可以是碳青霉烯糖生产者或非生产者。在沙特阿拉伯王国,blaOXA-48和blaNDM代表大多数碳青霉烯酶分离物。由blaNDM引起的产生碳青霉烯酶的CRE的治疗选择非常有限。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦加氨曲南(CZA-ATM)或头孢地洛作为单一疗法被认为是这些感染的首选治疗方法。这里,我们报告了一例70岁的男性患者,其手术部位感染了膝关节以上截肢残端。培养物显示,耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌对CZA-ATM疗法耐药的blaNDM和blaOXA-48呈阳性,对替加环素具有中等敏感性。他开始使用CZA-ATM进行肾功能调整,和高剂量替加环素,每日伤口敷料和冲洗。到抗生素治疗方案的第20天,他根据反复的伤口培养进行了临床和微生物治疗。在有限的靶向选择背景下,该病例确定了对CZA-ATM具有抗性的BlaNDM和BlaOXA-48阳性的CRE皮肤和软组织感染的罕见发生率。但用CZA-ATM和大剂量替加环素成功治疗。当没有其他抗生素选择可用于治疗广泛耐药的肺炎克雷伯菌时,这种治疗方法在少数情况下可能有用。
    Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a significant public health concern. CRE could be carbapenamse producers or non-producers. In the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, bla OXA-48 and bla NDM represent the majority of carbapenemase isolates. There are very limited treatment options for carbapenemase-producing CRE caused by bla NDM. Ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam (CZA-ATM) or cefiderocol as monotherapy are considered the treatment of choice for these infections. Here, we report a case of a 70-year-old man presented with surgical site infection of above knee amputation stump. The cultures revealed carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae positive for bla NDM and bla OXA-48 resistant to CZA-ATM therapy and intermediate susceptibility to tigecycline. He was started on CZA-ATM both adjusted for renal function, and high dose tigecycline with daily wound dressing and irrigation. By day 20 of the antibiotic regimens, he had clinical and microbiological cure based on repeated wound cultures. This case identifies a rare incidence of CRE skin and soft tissue infection positive for bla NDM and bla OXA-48 resistant to CZA-ATM in a background of limited targeted options, but successfully treated with CZA-ATM and high-dose tigecycline. Such therapeutic approach might be useful in few circumstances when no other antibiotic options are available to treat extensively drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了监测耐药率并更深入地了解耐药机制,我们在教学医院进行了为期2年的监测,重点关注与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)临床使用相关的肺炎克雷伯菌.共筛选了4,641株肺炎克雷伯菌,通过药敏试验鉴定CZA耐药性。综合分析,包括同源性分析,共轭实验,克隆试验,和全基因组测序,进一步对CZA抗性菌株进行了研究。总的来说,从4名患者中分离出4株CZA耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(CZA-R-Kp),其中三人在住院期间接受了CZA治疗,占CZA应激下肺炎克雷伯菌抗性发展率的4%(3/75)。发现所有CZA-R-Kp分离株都具有blaKPC-2的变体。鉴定的突变包括blaKPC-33、blaKPC-86和命名为blaKPC-129的新变体,所有这些都位于KPC酶的Ω环中。发现这些突变会影响酶活性中心的氨基酸序列和空间结构,从而影响KPC碳青霉烯酶活性。这项研究强调了主动监测对CZA耐药性出现的重要性,强调需要正在进行的研究,以制定有效的策略来对抗抗菌素耐药性。了解耐药背后的机制对于维持CZA的疗效至关重要,对抗多重耐药感染的重要工具。重要作为治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌的有效药物,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)近年来开始产生耐药性,并呈增加趋势。为了有效监测CZA的耐药率,了解其耐药机制,我们监测肺炎克雷伯菌超过2年,以发现CZA耐药菌株。通过对筛选出的CZA耐药菌株的综合分析,发现所有CZA抗性菌株都有突变,这可能会影响KPC碳青霉烯酶的活性。这项研究强调了主动监测对监测CZA耐药性出现的重要性。这凸显了正在进行的研究以制定有效的策略来对抗抗菌素耐药性的必要性。了解抵抗背后的机制对于保持CZA的有效性至关重要,对抗多重耐药感染的重要工具。
    To monitor the resistance rate and gain a deeper understanding of the resistance mechanisms, we conducted over a 2-year surveillance focusing on the Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with the clinical usage of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in a teaching hospital. A total of 4,641 K. pneumoniae isolates were screened to identify the CZA resistance through antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Comprehensive analyses, including homology analysis, conjugation experiments, clone assays, and whole genome sequencing, were furtherly performed on the CZA-resistant strains. In total, four CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae (CZA-R-Kp) strains were separated from four patients, in which three of them received CZA treatment during the hospitalization, accounting for a 4% (3/75) resistance development rate of K. pneumoniae under CZA stress. All CZA-R-Kp isolates were found to possess variants of blaKPC-2. The identified mutations included blaKPC-33, blaKPC-86, and a novel variant designated as blaKPC-129, all of which were located in the Ω loop of the KPC enzyme. These mutations were found to impact the amino acid sequence and spatial structure of the enzyme\'s active center, consequently affecting KPC carbapenemase activity. This study underscores the importance of active surveillance to monitor the emergence of resistance to CZA, highlighting the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies for combating antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is crucial in maintaining the efficacy of CZA, a vital tool in the battle against multidrug-resistant infections.IMPORTANCEAs an effective drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) began to develop resistance in recent years and showed an increasing trend. In order to effectively monitor the resistance rate of CZA and understand its resistance mechanism, we monitored K. pneumoniae for more than 2 years to find CZA-resistant strains. Through comprehensive analysis of the selected CZA-resistant strains, it was found that all the CZA-resistant strains had mutation, which could affect the activity of KPC carbapenemase. This study highlights the importance of proactive surveillance to monitor the emergence of CZA resistance, which highlights the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is critical to maintaining the effectiveness of CZA, an important tool in the fight against multidrug-resistant infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新的β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合代表了治疗由多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染的最后手段抗生素。碳青霉烯酶基因的获取会限制其活性谱,对这些新分子的抗性的报道也在增加。在这项多中心研究中,我们评估了来自血流感染的铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)和比较物的耐药率,医院获得性肺炎或呼吸机相关性肺炎,尿路感染,在意大利南部流通。我们还研究了CZA抗性(CZAR)分离株的相关β-内酰胺抗性机制的克隆性和含量。收集总共120个铜绿假单胞菌分离物。CZA是最活跃的β-内酰胺类,在81.7%的病例中保留易感性,之前是头孢地洛洛尔(95.8%),其次是头孢洛赞-他唑巴坦(79.2%),美罗培南-伐巴坦(76.1%),亚胺培南-莱巴坦(75%),和氨曲南(69.6%)。在非β-内酰胺中,粘菌素和阿米卡星分别对100%和85.8%的分离株具有活性。在进行全基因组测序的CZAR菌株中(n=18),抗性主要是由于金属-β-内酰胺酶的表达(66.6%VIM型和5.5%FIM-1),其次是PER-1(16.6%)和GES-1(5.5%)超广谱β-内酰胺酶,主要由国际高风险克隆(ST111和ST235)携带。值得注意的是,两株产生PER-1酶的菌株对所有β-内酰胺都有抗性,包括头孢得洛.总之,意大利南部铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的CZA耐药率仍然很低。CZAR分离株主要是金属β-内酰胺酶生产者,属于ST111和ST253流行病克隆。重要的是实施强大的监测系统以监测新的抗性机制的出现并限制铜绿假单胞菌高风险克隆的传播。
    目的:多药耐药的铜绿假单胞菌感染是一个日益严重的威胁,由于有限的治疗选择。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是治疗难以治疗的铜绿假单胞菌感染的最后手段抗生素,尽管由于获得可转移的β-内酰胺酶基因而产生的抗性正在增加。有了这项工作,我们报告说,CZA代表一种高活性的反假子β-内酰胺化合物(头孢地洛之后),金属β-内酰胺酶(VIM型)和广谱β-内酰胺酶(GES和PER型)的产生是意大利南部医院分离株对CZA耐药的主要因素。此外,我们报道,此类抗性机制主要由国际高危克隆ST111和ST235携带.
    New β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations represent last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Carbapenemase gene acquisition can limit their spectrum of activity, and reports of resistance toward these new molecules are increasing. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and comparators among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from bloodstream infections, hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, and urinary tract infections, circulating in Southern Italy. We also investigated the clonality and content of relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms of CZA-resistant (CZAR) isolates. A total of 120 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected. CZA was among the most active β-lactams, retaining susceptibility in the 81.7% of cases, preceded by cefiderocol (95.8%) and followed by ceftolozane-tazobactam (79.2%), meropenem-vaborbactam (76.1%), imipenem-relebactam (75%), and aztreonam (69.6%). Among non-β-lactams, colistin and amikacin were active against 100% and 85.8% of isolates respectively. In CZAR strains subjected to whole-genome sequencing (n = 18), resistance was mainly due to the expression of metallo-β-lactamases (66.6% VIM-type and 5.5% FIM-1), followed by PER-1 (16.6%) and GES-1 (5.5%) extended-spectrum β-lactamases, mostly carried by international high-risk clones (ST111 and ST235). Of note, two strains producing the PER-1 enzyme were resistant to all β-lactams, including cefiderocol. In conclusion, the CZA resistance rate among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in Southern Italy remained low. CZAR isolates were mostly metallo-β-lactamases producers and belonging to ST111 and ST253 epidemic clones. It is important to implement robust surveillance systems to monitor emergence of new resistance mechanisms and to limit the spread of P. aeruginosa high-risk clones.
    OBJECTIVE: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a growing threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is among the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections, although resistance due to the acquisition of transferable β-lactamase genes is increasing. With this work, we report that CZA represents a highly active antipseudomonal β-lactam compound (after cefiderocol), and that metallo-β-lactamases (VIM-type) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (GES and PER-type) production is the major factor underlying CZA resistance in isolates from Southern Italian hospitals. In addition, we reported that such resistance mechanisms were mainly carried by the international high-risk clones ST111 and ST235.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染是全球公共卫生的巨大威胁。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是一种有效的抗CRKP的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂。然而,对CZA的抗性报告,主要由肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)变异体引起,近年来有所增加。在这项研究中,我们的目的是描述KPC-12的耐药特征,这是一种从CZA耐药肺炎克雷伯菌中鉴定出的新型KPC变异体.
    从呼吸道感染患者收集的肺炎克雷伯菌YFKP-97在IlluminaNovaSeq6000平台上进行了全基因组测序(WGS)。使用生物信息学方法分析基因组特征。通过肉汤微量稀释法进行抗菌药敏感性测试。如前所述在体外进行抗性菌株的诱导。采用G.mellonella杀灭试验评价菌株的致病性,并进行接合实验以评估质粒转移能力。
    菌株YFKP-97是一种多重耐药的临床ST11-KL47肺炎克雷伯菌,对CZA(16/4μg/mL)具有高度耐药性。WGS透露,KPC变体,KPC-12由IncFII(pHN7A8)质粒(pYFKP-97_a和pYFKP-97_b)携带,对碳青霉烯类抗生素的活性显着降低。此外,blaKPC-12对其对头孢他啶的活性具有剂量依赖性作用.体外诱导型抗性测定结果表明,KPC-12变体比KPC-2和KPC-3变体更可能赋予对CZA的抗性。
    我们的研究表明,未接受CZA治疗的患者也可能感染具有新型KPC变体的CZA抗性菌株。鉴于携带blaKPC-12的转化体更可能表现出CZA抗性表型。因此,尽早准确识别KPC变异非常重要.
    UNASSIGNED: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a great threat to public health worldwide. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is an effective β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors against CRKP. However, reports of resistance to CZA, mainly caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants, have increased in recent years. In this study, we aimed to describe the resistance characteristics of KPC-12, a novel KPC variant identified from a CZA resistant K. pneumoniae.
    UNASSIGNED: The K. pneumoniae YFKP-97 collected from a patient with respiratory tract infection was performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Genomic characteristics were analyzed using bioinformatics methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by the broth microdilution method. Induction of resistant strain was carried out in vitro as previously described. The G. mellonella killing assay was used to evaluate the pathogenicity of strains, and the conjugation experiment was performed to evaluate plasmid transfer ability.
    UNASSIGNED: Strain YFKP-97 was a multidrug-resistant clinical ST11-KL47 K. pneumoniae confers high-level resistance to CZA (16/4 μg/mL). WGS revealed that a KPC variant, KPC-12, was carried by the IncFII (pHN7A8) plasmids (pYFKP-97_a and pYFKP-97_b) and showed significantly decreased activity against carbapenems. In addition, there was a dose-dependent effect of bla KPC-12 on its activity against ceftazidime. In vitro inducible resistance assay results demonstrated that the KPC-12 variant was more likely to confer resistance to CZA than the KPC-2 and KPC-3 variants.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed that patients who was not treated with CZA are also possible to be infected with CZA-resistant strains harbored a novel KPC variant. Given that the transformant carrying bla KPC-12 was more likely to exhibit a CZA-resistance phenotype. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify the KPC variants as early as possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)是可用于治疗碳青霉烯类耐药革兰氏阴性菌(CRB)感染的新型抗生素之一。我们的目的是描述CAZ-AVI在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)住院的儿童中的使用,怀疑或证实CRB感染。
    方法:在里约热内卢的两个PICU中进行了回顾性描述性研究,巴西,2020年1月至2024年1月。包括接受CAZ-AVI超过24小时的0至18岁儿童。
    结果:37例患者使用CAZ-AVI。中位年龄为28个月(范围1-215),男性17人(45.9%)。从患者入院到CAZ-AVI的初始处方的中位时间为39.9天(范围1-138)。34(91.9%)儿童在入院时至少有一种合并症,并且(91.9%)在CAZ-AVI处方之前使用了至少一种侵入性设备,89.2%的患者之前曾接受过碳青霉烯;15例(40.5%)患者在使用CAZ-AVI之前曾接受过医疗保健相关感染(HAI)。CAZ-AVI的平均使用时间为11天(范围1-22)。在处方前24小时或处方当天,从12名(32.4%)患者的培养物中分离出革兰氏阴性细菌。在五名患者中,CRB在文化中得到证实,在其中四个(80%)中,治疗7天后验证微生物清除。30天死亡率为37.8%。
    结论:几乎所有使用CAZ-AVI的患者都是患有多种合并症且既往使用过碳青霉烯类抗生素的危重患儿。在CRB确认的感染中,7天内微生物学清除率高。
    BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is one of the new antibiotics available to treat infections due to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CRB). Our aim was to describe the use of CAZ-AVI in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), with suspected or proven CRB infections.
    METHODS: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in two PICUs of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, between January 2020 and January 2024. Children aged 0 to 18 years who received CAZ-AVI for more than 24 h were included.
    RESULTS: CAZ-AVI was used in 37 patients. The median age was 28 months (range 1-215), 17 (45.9%) being male. The median time from the patient admission to the initial prescription of CAZ-AVI was 39.9 days (range 1-138). Thirty-four (91.9%) children had at least one comorbidity at admission and (91.9%) used at least one invasive device prior to the CAZ-AVI prescription, and 89.2% had received carbapenem before; and fifteen (40.5%) had healthcare-associated infection (HAI) prior to CAZ-AVI use. The mean time of CAZ-AVI use was 11 days (range 1-22). Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in cultures from 12 (32.4%) patients in the 24 h prior to prescription or on the day of prescription. In five patients, CRB was confirmed in cultures, and in four (80%) of them, microbiological clearance was verified after 7 days of treatment. The 30-day mortality rate was 37.8%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients who used CAZ-AVI were critically ill children with multiple comorbidities and previous use of carbapenems. Among CRB confirmed infections, microbiology clearance in 7 days was high.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:产生碳青霉烯酶的肺炎克雷伯菌(CP-KP)对公共卫生构成全球威胁,有限的抗菌治疗选择。在这项研究中,我们分析了从一名患者中获得的头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)耐药肺炎克雷伯菌分离株,该患者先前暴露于表达新型肺炎克雷伯酶(KPC)-3变异体的CAZ-AVI.
    方法:使用参考肉汤微量稀释进行抗菌药物敏感性试验。使用Illumina和纳米孔技术进行全基因组测序(WGS)。短读段和长读段与Unicycler组合。研究了组装的多位点序列分型(MLST),抗菌素抗性基因,孔,和质粒。
    结果:肺炎克雷伯菌分离株(KP_RM_1)对CAZ-AVI耐药,广谱头孢菌素,阿米卡星,厄他培南,和头孢地洛(FDC),但对替加环素敏感,粘菌素,甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑,美罗培南-瓦巴坦,还有亚胺培南-莱巴坦.WGS揭示KP_RM_1基因组由5个Mbp的单个染色体和5个环状质粒组成。进一步分析显示存在位于72kb质粒上的新型blaKPC-216。KPC-216与KPC-3的不同之处在于Lysin(K)在位置168(+K168)插入。
    结论:我们报告了与CAZ-AVI抗性相关的新KPC-3变体的鉴定。应确定与CAZ-AVI耐药性相关的KPC变体,以及时通知临床医生并开始适当的抗菌治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-KP) represents a global threat to public health, with limited antimicrobial therapeutic options. In this study, we analyzed a ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-resistant K. pneumoniae isolate obtained from a patient previously exposed to CAZ-AVI expressing a novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-3 variant.
    METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using reference broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed using Illumina and Nanopore Technologies. Short- and long-reads were combined with Unicycler. Assemblies were investigated for multilocus sequence typing (MLST), antimicrobial resistance genes, porins, and plasmids.
    RESULTS: The K. pneumoniae isolate (KP_RM_1) was resistant to CAZ-AVI, expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, amikacin, ertapenem, and cefiderocol (FDC) but was susceptible to tigecycline, colistin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-relebactam. WGS revealed that the KP_RM_1 genome is composed of a single chromosome of 5 Mbp and five circular plasmids. Further analysis showed the presence of novel blaKPC-216 located on a 72 kb plasmid. KPC-216 differs from KPC-3 by a Lysin (K) insertion at position 168 (+K168).
    CONCLUSIONS: We report the identification of a new KPC-3 variant associated with CAZ-AVI resistance. The KPC variants associated with CAZ-AVI resistance should be determined to promptly inform clinicians and start the appropriate antimicrobial therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯的肠杆菌代表了主要的健康威胁,几乎没有批准的治疗选择。从六个欧洲国家(2020年1月1日至12月31日)的49个地点的住院患者中收集肠杆菌分离株,并对头孢地洛和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合进行了敏感性测试。通过PCR分析了耐美罗培南(MIC>8mg/L)和对头孢地洛敏感的分离株,通过全基因组测序和抗头孢霉素分离株,确定抗性机制。总的来说,1,909株(包括970个克雷伯菌属。,382大肠杆菌,和244种肠杆菌属。)被收集,通常来自血液感染(43.6%)。头孢地醇对所有肠杆菌的敏感性高于批准的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,并且与头孢吡肟-坦尼巴坦和氨曲南-阿维巴坦相当(98.1%vs78.1%-97.4%和98.7%-99.1%,分别)和对美罗培南耐药的肠杆菌(n=148,包括125种克雷伯菌。;87.8%vs0%-71.6%和93.2%-98.6%,分别),β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(66.7%-92.1%vs0%-88.1%和66.7%-97.9%,分别),美罗培南和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合(61.9%-65.9%vs0%-20.5%和76.2%-97.7%,分别)。批准和开发的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对头孢地洛耐药肠杆菌(n=37)的敏感性分别为10.8%-56.8%和78.4%-94.6%,分别。大多数耐美罗培南的肠杆菌含有肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(110/148)基因,尽管金属-β-内酰胺酶(35/148)和氧嘧啶酶(OXA)碳青霉烯酶(6/148)基因较不常见;头孢地洛敏感性保留在β-内酰胺酶生产者中,除了NDM,AMPC,和非碳青霉烯酶OXA生产者。大多数头孢地洛耐药肠杆菌具有多种耐药机制,包括≥1个铁摄取相关突变(37/37),碳青霉烯酶基因(33/37),和FTSI突变(24/37)。对头孢地洛的敏感性高于批准的β-lac+tam/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合对欧洲肠杆菌的敏感性,包括美罗培南和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合耐药的分离株。
    目的:这项研究收集了大量来自欧洲的肠杆菌分离株,首次直接比较了头孢地洛和发育型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合的体外活性。高剂量美罗培南的MIC断点用于定义美罗培南耐药性,因此,在临床上可用于患者的剂量下,仍对美罗培南耐药的分离株被包括在数据中。对头孢地洛的易感性,作为单一的活性化合物,对肠杆菌的抵抗力较高,并且高于或与可用的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合相当。这些结果提供了对由于具有抗性表型的肠杆菌引起的感染的治疗选择的见解。头孢地洛与β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合平行的早期敏感性测试将允许患者及时接受最合适的治疗选择。当选项更有限时,这一点尤其重要,例如针对产生金属-β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌。
    Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-‍resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-‍97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-‍92.1% vs 0%-‍88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and β-‌lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-‍20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-‍56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-β-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in β-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved β-lac‌tam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates.
    OBJECTIVE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于革兰氏阴性杆菌的多药耐药性而难以获得有效的抗生素治疗,这迫使人们探索现有抗生素之间协同相互作用的新可能性。
    进行了一项分析,以评估两种抗生素治疗方案在治疗由产生碳青霉烯酶(MBL)的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株引起的感染中的功效。考虑了两个患者组:A组-感染治疗涉及头孢他啶-阿维巴坦联合氨曲南的应用的个体。B组包括接受替代抗生素治疗方案的患者。
    在接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南治疗方案的组中,与替代抗生素组合相比,在治疗过程中统计学上较低的死亡率和对给药治疗更快的临床反应是明显的.
    获得的结果可能适用于进行的常规体外测定,并为通过头孢他啶-阿维巴坦和氨曲南之间的协同作用潜在利用抗生素治疗的积极作用提供有价值的指导。选择用于治疗肺炎克雷伯菌引起的侵袭性感染的抗生素会影响最终的治疗结果。
    UNASSIGNED: The difficulties in attaining effective antibiotic therapy arising from the multidrug resistance of Gram-negative bacilli compel the exploration of new possibilities for synergistic interactions among existing antibiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: An analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of two antibiotic therapy regimens in the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing carbapenemases (MBL). Two patient groups were considered: Group A - individuals in whom the treatment of infection involved the application of ceftazidime-avibactam in combination with aztreonam. Group B comprised patients subjected to an alternative antibiotic therapy regimen.
    UNASSIGNED: In the group subjected to the treatment regimen involving ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam, as compared to alternative antibiotic combinations, a statistically lower mortality rate during the course of treatment and a faster clinical response to the administered therapy were evident.
    UNASSIGNED: The results obtained may be applicable to routine in vitro assays performed and serve as valuable guidance for the potential utilization of the positive effect of antibiotic therapy through the synergy between ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam. The selection of antibiotics employed in the therapy of invasive infections caused by K. pneumoniae influences the ultimate treatment outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景与目的多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌(MDR-GNB)引起的血流感染(BSIs)在抗生素耐药性(AMR)上升的情况下构成了重大的全球健康威胁。本研究旨在探讨头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)作为这些感染的治疗选择的疗效,解决迫切需要新的治疗方法。材料和方法本研究在微生物学系进行了一年多,JSS医学院和医院,Mysuru,印度,并采用了基于实验室的前瞻性设计。从总共376个阳性血培养物中,已鉴定出147株多重耐药(MDR)生物,随机选择100个进行最终分析。通过圆盘扩散和最小抑制浓度(MIC)测定进行敏感性测试以评估CZA功效。结果肺炎克雷伯菌(K。肺炎)是亚群中的主要(78%)生物,在不同物种中观察到不同的易感性模式。总体CZA易感性为45%,磁盘扩散和黄金标准测试之间存在显著差异。值得注意的是,对铜绿假单胞菌的疗效有限(P.铜绿假单胞菌)结论这项研究强调了在对抗MDR感染中迫切需要可靠的测试方法和新的治疗策略。必须进行更大样本量的进一步研究,以验证我们的发现并指导临床医生有效地应对这一关键的健康挑战。
    Background and objective Bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) pose a significant global health threat amid rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) as a therapeutic option for these infections, addressing the urgent need for novel treatments. Materials and methods This study was conducted over one year in the Department of Microbiology, JSS Medical College and Hospital, Mysuru, India, and employed a laboratory-based prospective design. From a total of 376 positive blood cultures, 147 multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms were identified, and 100 were randomly selected for final analysis. Susceptibility testing via disk diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination was performed to evaluate CZA efficacy. Results Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) was the predominant (78%) organism among the subsets, with varying susceptibility patterns observed across species. The overall CZA susceptibility was 45%, with significant discrepancies between disk diffusion and gold standard testing. Notably, there was limited efficacy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) Conclusions This study underscores the pressing need for reliable testing methods and novel treatment strategies in combating MDR infections. Further research with larger sample sizes is imperative to validate our findings and guide clinicians effectively in addressing this critical health challenge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些队列研究探讨了多粘菌素B(PMB)与其他抗生素治疗医院感染的效果和安全性,产生不一致的结果。本系统评价旨在探讨PMB的有效性和安全性,并将其与其他抗生素进行比较。
    在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,和WebofScience,搜索特定术语以确定定量队列研究或RCT,这些研究或RCT比较了PMB与其他抗生素的疗效和安全性.采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估观察性研究偏倚的风险。使用95%置信区间的赔率比进行结果评估。我们使用I2检验评估异质性。
    共22项观察性试验纳入分析。与对照组相比,PMB组的死亡率更高(比值比:1.84,95%CI:1.36-2.50,p<0.00001,I2=73%)。while,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组表现出明显的优势,死亡率较低,尽管仍表现出较高的异质性(比值比2.73,95%置信区间1.59-4.69;p=0.0003;I2=53%)。此外,与粘菌素组相比,PMB组的肾毒性率较低,但结果具有高度异质性(比值比0.58,95%CI0.36~0.93;p=0.02;I2=73%).
    在医院感染患者中,PMB在死亡率方面并不优于其他抗生素,特别是与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦相比。然而,与粘菌素相比,PMB在肾毒性方面表现出优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Some cohort studies have explored the effects and safety of polymyxin B (PMB) in comparison to other antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial infections, yielding inconsistent results. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of PMB and compared it with other antibiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, searching specific terms to identify quantitative cohort studies or RCTs that compared the effects of PMB with other antibiotics in terms of their efficacy and safety. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was conducted to evaluate the risk of bias of observational studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used for outcome assessment. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I 2 test.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 22 observational trials were included in the analysis. The PMB group had a higher mortality rate compared to the control group (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p<0.00001, I 2 = 73%). while, the ceftazidime-avibactam group demonstrated a distinct advantage with lower mortality rates, despite still exhibiting high heterogeneity (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.59-4.69; p = 0.0003; I 2 = 53%). Additionally, the PMB group had a lower nephrotoxicity rate compared to the colistin group but exhibited high heterogeneity in the results (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; p = 0.02; I 2 = 73%).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with nosocomial infections, PMB is not superior to other antibiotics in terms of mortality, specifically when compared to ceftazidime-avibactam. However, PMB demonstrated an advantage in terms of nephrotoxicity compared to colistin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号