Ceftazidime-avibactam

头孢他啶 - 阿维巴坦
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新的β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合代表了治疗由多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染的最后手段抗生素。碳青霉烯酶基因的获取会限制其活性谱,对这些新分子的抗性的报道也在增加。在这项多中心研究中,我们评估了来自血流感染的铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)和比较物的耐药率,医院获得性肺炎或呼吸机相关性肺炎,尿路感染,在意大利南部流通。我们还研究了CZA抗性(CZAR)分离株的相关β-内酰胺抗性机制的克隆性和含量。收集总共120个铜绿假单胞菌分离物。CZA是最活跃的β-内酰胺类,在81.7%的病例中保留易感性,之前是头孢地洛洛尔(95.8%),其次是头孢洛赞-他唑巴坦(79.2%),美罗培南-伐巴坦(76.1%),亚胺培南-莱巴坦(75%),和氨曲南(69.6%)。在非β-内酰胺中,粘菌素和阿米卡星分别对100%和85.8%的分离株具有活性。在进行全基因组测序的CZAR菌株中(n=18),抗性主要是由于金属-β-内酰胺酶的表达(66.6%VIM型和5.5%FIM-1),其次是PER-1(16.6%)和GES-1(5.5%)超广谱β-内酰胺酶,主要由国际高风险克隆(ST111和ST235)携带。值得注意的是,两株产生PER-1酶的菌株对所有β-内酰胺都有抗性,包括头孢得洛.总之,意大利南部铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的CZA耐药率仍然很低。CZAR分离株主要是金属β-内酰胺酶生产者,属于ST111和ST253流行病克隆。重要的是实施强大的监测系统以监测新的抗性机制的出现并限制铜绿假单胞菌高风险克隆的传播。
    目的:多药耐药的铜绿假单胞菌感染是一个日益严重的威胁,由于有限的治疗选择。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是治疗难以治疗的铜绿假单胞菌感染的最后手段抗生素,尽管由于获得可转移的β-内酰胺酶基因而产生的抗性正在增加。有了这项工作,我们报告说,CZA代表一种高活性的反假子β-内酰胺化合物(头孢地洛之后),金属β-内酰胺酶(VIM型)和广谱β-内酰胺酶(GES和PER型)的产生是意大利南部医院分离株对CZA耐药的主要因素。此外,我们报道,此类抗性机制主要由国际高危克隆ST111和ST235携带.
    New β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations represent last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Carbapenemase gene acquisition can limit their spectrum of activity, and reports of resistance toward these new molecules are increasing. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the prevalence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and comparators among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from bloodstream infections, hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated pneumonia, and urinary tract infections, circulating in Southern Italy. We also investigated the clonality and content of relevant β-lactam resistance mechanisms of CZA-resistant (CZAR) isolates. A total of 120 P. aeruginosa isolates were collected. CZA was among the most active β-lactams, retaining susceptibility in the 81.7% of cases, preceded by cefiderocol (95.8%) and followed by ceftolozane-tazobactam (79.2%), meropenem-vaborbactam (76.1%), imipenem-relebactam (75%), and aztreonam (69.6%). Among non-β-lactams, colistin and amikacin were active against 100% and 85.8% of isolates respectively. In CZAR strains subjected to whole-genome sequencing (n = 18), resistance was mainly due to the expression of metallo-β-lactamases (66.6% VIM-type and 5.5% FIM-1), followed by PER-1 (16.6%) and GES-1 (5.5%) extended-spectrum β-lactamases, mostly carried by international high-risk clones (ST111 and ST235). Of note, two strains producing the PER-1 enzyme were resistant to all β-lactams, including cefiderocol. In conclusion, the CZA resistance rate among P. aeruginosa clinical isolates in Southern Italy remained low. CZAR isolates were mostly metallo-β-lactamases producers and belonging to ST111 and ST253 epidemic clones. It is important to implement robust surveillance systems to monitor emergence of new resistance mechanisms and to limit the spread of P. aeruginosa high-risk clones.
    OBJECTIVE: Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections are a growing threat due to the limited therapeutic options available. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is among the last-resort antibiotics for the treatment of difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa infections, although resistance due to the acquisition of transferable β-lactamase genes is increasing. With this work, we report that CZA represents a highly active antipseudomonal β-lactam compound (after cefiderocol), and that metallo-β-lactamases (VIM-type) and extended-spectrum β-lactamases (GES and PER-type) production is the major factor underlying CZA resistance in isolates from Southern Italian hospitals. In addition, we reported that such resistance mechanisms were mainly carried by the international high-risk clones ST111 and ST235.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头孢他啶-阿维巴坦是碳青霉烯耐药革兰阴性杆菌(CR-GNB)感染的一种治疗选择。然而,肾移植(KT)受者与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)治疗失败相关的危险因素以及是否需要基于CAZ-AVI的联合治疗仍不清楚.
    从2019年6月至2023年12月,对接受CAZ-AVI治疗的CR-GNB感染的KT接受者进行了回顾性观察研究,主要结局是30天死亡率,次要结局是临床治愈,微生物治疗,和安全。还研究了30天死亡率和临床失败的危险因素。
    本研究包括总共81名接受CAZ-AVI治疗的KT接受者。40例(49.4%)接受CAZ-AVI单药治疗,30天死亡率为22.2%。CAZ/AVI治疗的临床治愈率和微生物治愈率分别为72.8%和66.7%,分别。CAZ-AVI单独或与其他药物组合对临床治愈或30天死亡率没有影响。多因素logistic回归分析显示,较高的急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II评分(比值比[OR]:4.517;95%置信区间[CI]:1.397-14.607;P=0.012)是30天死亡率的独立危险因素。临床治愈与感染发作48小时内给予CAZ-AVI呈正相关(OR:11.009;95%CI:1.344-90.197;P=0.025),与较高的APACHEII评分呈负相关(OR:0.700;95%CI:0.555-0.882;P=0.002)。4名(4.9%)受者在初次感染后90天内出现复发,3名(3.7%)受者经历了CAZ-AVI相关的不良事件,没有发现CAZ-AVI耐药性。
    CAZ-AVI是治疗肾移植后CR-GNB感染的有效药物,甚至作为单一疗法。CAZ/AVI治疗的优化(在感染发作的48小时内使用)与潜在的临床益处正相关。需要更大规模的研究来验证这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Ceftazidime-avibactam is a treatment option for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections. However, the risk factors associated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) treatment failure in kidney transplant (KT) recipients and the need for CAZ-AVI-based combination therapy remain unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: From June 2019 to December 2023, a retrospective observational study of KT recipients with CR-GNB infection treated with CAZ-AVI was conducted, with the primary outcome being 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes being clinical cure, microbiological cure, and safety. Risk factors for 30-day mortality and clinical failure were also investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 81 KT recipients treated with CAZ-AVI were included in this study. Forty recipients (49.4%) received CAZ-AVI monotherapy, with a 30-day mortality of 22.2%. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 72.8% and 66.7%, respectively. CAZ-AVI alone or in combination with other medications had no effect on clinical cure or 30-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (odds ratio [OR]: 4.517; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.397-14.607; P = 0.012) was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. Clinical cure was positively associated with the administration of CAZ-AVI within 48 hours of infection onset (OR: 11.009; 95% CI: 1.344-90.197; P=0.025) and negatively associated with higher APACHE II scores (OR: 0.700; 95% CI: 0.555-0.882; P=0.002). Four (4.9%) recipients experienced recurrence within 90 days after the initial infection, 3 (3.7%) recipients experienced CAZ-AVI-related adverse events, and no CAZ-AVI resistance was identified.
    UNASSIGNED: CAZ-AVI is an effective medication for treating CR-GNB infections following kidney transplantation, even as monotherapy. Optimization of CAZ/AVI therapy (used within 48 hours of infection onset) is positively associated with potential clinical benefit. Further larger-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的主要目的是比较和分析使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(CAZ/AVI)与磷霉素加美罗培南(FOS/MER)治疗方案的有效性在危重病人中由碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(KRP)引起的血流感染(BSI)或呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)。在2019年1月4日至2023年7月16日之间,回顾性调查了在三级护理医院ICU中因培养证实的CRKP而诊断为BSI或VAP的成年患者(≥18岁)。共有71名患者被分为两组:30名基于CAZ/AVI的患者,FOS/MER组41例。在ICU住院的总持续时间中没有发现实质性差异,以及14天和30天的死亡率,基于CAZ/AVI和基于FOS/MER的治疗方案的患者之间。我们认为,我们的研究首次全面了解了CRKP相关感染患者的治疗结果和相关危险因素。
    The main aim of this study was to compare and analyze the effectiveness of treatment regimens using ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) versus fosfomycin plus meropenem (FOS/MER) for managing bloodstream infections (BSI) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in critically ill patients. Between 4 January 2019, and 16 July 2023, adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with BSI or VAP due to culture confirmed CRKP in ICU of a tertiary care hospital were investigated retrospectively. A total of 71 patients were categorized into two groups: 30 patients in CAZ/AVI-based, and 41 patients in FOS/MER-based group. No substantial disparities were found in the total duration of ICU hospitalization, as well as the 14- and 30-day mortality rates, between patients treated with CAZ/AVI-based and FOS/MER-based therapeutic regimens. We consider that our study provides for the first time a comprehensive understanding of treatment outcomes and associated risk factors among patients with CRKP-related infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)在中国市场推出以来,越来越多的临床证据证实了其在治疗耐碳青霉烯类革兰阴性菌(CR-GNB)引起的感染方面的有效性.然而,在设计临床抗感染方案时,关于单药治疗和联合治疗之间的选择一直存在争议。
    这次回顾展,单中心观察性研究纳入了2019年12月至2023年8月期间接受CZA治疗的CR-GNB感染患者.评估的主要结果是30天死亡率,测量的次要结局是14天细菌清除。使用多变量Cox回归模型来确定与30天死亡率独立相关的变量。
    83名患者被纳入研究;其中,45人接受CZA单药治疗,而38人接受联合治疗。总体30天死亡率为31.3%,CZA联合治疗组和单药治疗组的30天死亡率没有显着差异(31.6%vs31.1%,p=0.963)。在通过倾向得分匹配进行调整后,两组的30天死亡率没有显着差异(28.6%vs31.4%,p=0.794)。多因素COX分析显示年龄和SOFA评分是30天死亡率的独立预测因子。
    未发现CZA和其他抗微生物剂的联合疗法在降低30天死亡率方面优于单一疗法。
    UNASSIGNED: Since the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in the Chinese market, accumulating clinical evidence has substantiated its efficacy in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). Nevertheless, an ongoing debate persists concerning the choice between monotherapy and combination therapy when devising clinical anti-infection protocols.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, single-center observational study enrolled patients with CR-GNB infections who received CZA treatment between December 2019 and August 2023. The primary outcome assessed was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome measured was 14-day bacterial clearance. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to identify variables that were independently associated with 30-day mortality rate.
    UNASSIGNED: Eighty-three patients were enrolled in the study; of which, 45 received CZA monotherapy, whereas 38 received combination therapy. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 31.3%, and no significant difference was observed in the 30-day mortality rates between the CZA combination therapy and monotherapy groups (31.6% vs 31.1%, p=0.963). After adjustment by propensity score matching, the 30-day mortality rate was not significantly different between the two groups (28.6% vs 31.4%, p=0.794). Multivariate COX analysis revealed that age and SOFA score were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Combination therapy with CZA and other antimicrobials was not found to have an advantage over monotherapy in reducing the 30-day mortality rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:据报道,印度重症监护病房(ICU)医院获得性肺炎的发生率在9%至58%之间,死亡率为30-70%。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对OXA-48样碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌(CRE)具有活性,并且与肾毒性粘菌素相比具有更安全的不良反应。本研究旨在评估头孢他啶-阿维巴坦在印度现实环境中的革兰阴性医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的有效性和使用模式。
    方法:印度三个著名医疗中心住院患者的电子病历(富通纪念研究中心,Gurugram,SLRaheja医院,孟买,和富通医院,Anandapur,收集了加尔各答)医院获得性肺炎和记录的革兰氏阴性肺炎克雷伯菌(KP)证实的感染。这项研究评估了有效性,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的使用模式,以及临床和微生物治愈率。
    结果:在116名患者中,78.45%(91/116)显示临床治愈。13例患者中有9例(69.23%)观察到微生物治愈。在子集分析中,在诊断后72小时内开始使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦,临床治愈率为84.85%(28/33),微生物回收率为62.50%(5/8)。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的平均(±SD)时间为7.79±4.43天,在91.38%(106/116)中报告了体征和症状的改善。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦在研究中显示56%(28/56)的易感性。
    结论:本研究显示头孢他啶-阿维巴坦在耐碳青霉烯的KP医院性肺炎和VAP中的临床和微生物治愈率较高,耐受性较安全。这项研究进一步证明,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦可作为碳青霉烯类耐药KP的可行治疗选择之一,具有良好的临床疗效。
    OBJECTIVE: The incidences of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care units (ICUs) in India have been reported to range from 9% to 58% and are associated with a mortality rate of 30-70%. Ceftazidime-avibactam has activity against OXA-48-like carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and has a safer adverse effect profile as compared to the nephrotoxic colistin. The current study aimed to assess the effectiveness and usage pattern of ceftazidime-avibactam in gram-negative hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in real-world settings in India.
    METHODS: Electronic medical records of hospitalized patients in three prominent medical centers in India (Fortis Memorial Research Centre, Gurugram, S L Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, and Fortis Hospital, Anandapur, Kolkata) with nosocomial pneumonia and documented gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP)-confirmed infection were collected. This study assessed the effectiveness, usage pattern of ceftazidime-avibactam, and clinical and microbiological cure rates.
    RESULTS: Among the 116 patients included, 78.45% (91/116) showed clinical cure. Microbiological cure was observed in nine out of 13 (69.23%) patients. In the subset analysis, a clinical cure rate of 84.85% (28/33) and microbiological recovery rate of 62.50% (5/8) were observed when ceftazidime-avibactam was initiated within 72 hours of diagnosis. Ceftazidime-avibactam was administered for a mean (±SD) duration of 7.79 ± 4.43 days, with improvement in signs and symptoms reported among 91.38% (106/116). Ceftazidime-avibactam showed a susceptibility of 56% (28/56) in the study.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed a better clinical and microbiological cure rate with a safer tolerability profile of ceftazidime-avibactam in carbapenem-resistant KP nosocomial pneumonia and VAP. This study has further demonstrated that ceftazidime-avibactam may be used as one of the viable treatment choices in carbapenem-resistant KP with favorable clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (XDR-PA) is a growing concern due to its increasing incidence, limited therapeutic options, limited data on the optimal treatment, and high mortality rates. The study aimed to characterize the population, the outcome and the microbiological characteristics of XDR-PA identified in a Portuguese university hospital center.
    UNASSIGNED: All XDR-PA isolates between January 2019 and December 2021 were identified. XDR-PA was defined as resistance to piperacillin-tazobactam, third and fourth generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. A retrospective analysis of the medical records was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: One hundred seventy-eight individual episodes among 130 patients with XDR-PA detection were identified. The most common sources of infection were respiratory (32%) and urinary tracts (30%), although skin and soft tissue infections (18%) and primary bacteremia (14%) were also prevalent. Colonization was admitted in 64 cases. Several patients had risk factors for complicated infections, most notably immunosuppression, structural lung abnormalities, major surgery, hemodialysis or foreign intravascular or urinary devices. XDR-PA identification was more frequent in male patients with an average age of 64.3 ± 17.5 years. One non-susceptibility to colistin was reported. Only 12.4% were susceptible to aztreonam. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) was susceptible in 71.5% of the tested isolates. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) was susceptible in 77.5% of the tested isolates. Antibiotic regimens with XDR-PA coverage were reserved for patients with declared infection, except to cystic fibrosis. The most frequently administered antibiotics were colistin (41 cases), CZA (39 cases), and C/T (16 cases). When combination therapy was used, CZA plus colistin was preferred. The global mortality rate among infected patients was 35.1%, significantly higher in those with hematologic malignancy (50.0%, p < 0.05), followed by the ones with bacteremia (44.4%, p < 0.05) and those medicated with colistin (39.0%, p < 0.05), especially the ones with respiratory infections (60.0%). Among patients treated with CZA or C/T, the mortality rate seemed to be lower.
    UNASSIGNED: XDR-PA infections can be severe and difficult to treat, with a high mortality rate. Even though colistin seems to be a viable option, it is likely less safe and efficient than CZA and C/T. To the best of the authors\' knowledge, this is the first description of the clinical infection characteristics and treatment of XDR-PA in Portugal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)是一种重大的公共卫生威胁,因为它与大量的发病率和死亡率有关。然而,与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)治疗失败相关的危险因素以及是否需要以CAZ-AVI为基础的联合用药仍不清楚.
    我们对2020年6月至2022年12月在河南省人民医院诊断为CRKP感染并接受CAZ-AVI治疗至少24小时的危重患者(年龄>18岁)进行了回顾性研究。
    本研究共纳入103名接受CAZ-AVI的患者。其中,91例(88.3%)患者每q8h接受标准剂量2.5g,而只有20例(19.4%)接受单一疗法。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,在经历感染性休克的患者中,全因30天死亡率明显高于未经历感染性休克的患者。单药治疗和联合治疗之间的死亡率没有显着差异。CAZ-AVI的剂量减少与显著增加的死亡率相关。30天死亡率的独立危险因素包括较高的APACHEII评分(HR:1.084,95%CI:1.024-1.147,p=0.005)和较低的淋巴细胞计数(HR:0.247,95%CI:0.093-0.655,p=0.005)。相反,含有碳青霉烯类抗生素的联合治疗方案与较低的死亡率相关(HR:0.273,95%CI:0.086~0.869,p=0.028).
    我们的研究表明,CAZ-AVI在CRKP感染的危重患者的生存和临床反应方面提供了临床益处。较高的APACHEII评分和较低的淋巴细胞计数与30天死亡率相关。而含有碳青霉烯类的联合治疗方案是唯一的保护因素。CAZ-AVI剂量减少与死亡率增加相关。需要进一步的大规模研究来验证这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a significant public health threat, because it is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. However, the risk factors associated with treatment failure of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and the need for CAZ-AVI-based combination remain unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective study of critically ill patients (age: > 18 years) diagnosed with CRKP infections and treated with CAZ-AVI for at least 24 h between June 2020 and December 2022 at Henan Provincial People\'s Hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: This study included a total of 103 patients who received CAZ-AVI. Of these, 91 (88.3%) patients received the standard dosage of 2.5 g every q8h, while only 20 (19.4%) received monotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the all-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher among patients who experienced septic shock than those who did not. There was no significant difference in mortality between monotherapy and combination therapy. Dose reduction of CAZ-AVI was associated with a significantly increased mortality rate. Independent risk factors for the 30-day mortality included higher APACHE II score (HR: 1.084, 95% CI: 1.024-1.147, p = 0.005) and lower lymphocyte count (HR: 0.247, 95% CI: 0.093-0.655, p = 0.005). Conversely, a combination therapy regimen containing carbapenems was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.273, 95% CI: 0.086-0.869, p = 0.028).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study suggests that CAZ-AVI provides clinical benefits in terms of survival and clinical response in critically ill patients with CRKP infection. A higher APACHE II score and lower lymphocyte count were associated with 30-day mortality, while the combination therapy regimen containing carbapenems was the only protective factor. CAZ-AVI dose reduction was associated with an increased mortality rate. Futher large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯生物(CRO)感染的发生率在儿童中正在增加。然而,儿科特异性治疗策略提出了独特的挑战.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦是β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂的组合,对CRO分离株表现出足够的效率。然而,关于头孢他啶/阿维巴坦在儿童中的疗效的临床数据仍然缺乏。
    这是一项2020年至2022年在郑州大学第一附属医院接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗的儿童(年龄<18岁)的回顾性研究。
    我们确定了38名14岁(5.0-16.3)岁的儿童;20名(52.6%)患有血液系统恶性肿瘤。25例确诊为CRO感染的患儿给予头孢他啶-阿维巴坦作为靶向治疗。中位治疗时间为10(6.0-16.5)天。其中,24例由耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)(18例耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌和6例耐碳青霉烯类大肠杆菌)和1例耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌引起的感染。60.0%的病例(15/25)的感染源是血流。临床有效率为84.0%(21/25),30天死亡率为20%(5/25)。13名儿童接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦作为疑似感染的经验性治疗。中位治疗为8(6.0-13.0)天。13例接受头孢他啶-阿维巴坦经验性治疗的患者中,有12例(92.3%)没有发生死亡,并且达到了临床反应。
    头孢他啶-阿维巴坦对提高生存率很重要,以及由CRO引起的感染儿童的临床反应。
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of carbapenem-resistant organism (CRO) infections is increasing in children. However, pediatric-specific treatment strategies present unique challenges. Ceftazidime/avibactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, showing adequate efficiency against CRO isolates. However, clinical data on the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam in children are still lacking.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study of children (aged <18 years) infected with confirmed or suspected carbapenem-resistant pathogens and treated with ceftazidime-avibactam at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between 2020 and 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 38 children aged 14 (5.0-16.3) years; 20 (52.6%) had hematologic malignancies. 25 children with confirmed CRO infections were administered ceftazidime-avibactam as targeted therapy. The median treatment was 10 (6.0-16.5) days. Among them, 24 had infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) (18 carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and six carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli species) and one with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. The source of infection was the bloodstream in 60.0% of the cases (15/25). The clinical response rate was 84.0% (21/25), and 30-day mortality rate was 20% (5/25). 13 children were administered ceftazidime-avibactam as empiric therapy for suspected infections. The median treatment was 8 (6.0-13.0) days. No deaths occurred and clinical response was achieved in 12 of the 13 patients (92.3%) who empirically treated with ceftazidime-avibactam.
    UNASSIGNED: Ceftazidime-avibactam is important for improving survival, and clinical response in children with infections caused by CRO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    在美国24家医院的183名患有碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌菌血症的成人的倾向评分加权队列中,接受短期积极治疗的患者(7-10天,中位数9天)与接受长期积极治疗(14-21天,中位数14天)。
    In a propensity-score-weighted cohort of 183 adults with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteremia at 24 US hospitals, patients receiving short courses of active therapy (7-10 days, median 9 days) experienced similar odds of recurrent bacteremia or death within 30 days as those receiving prolonged courses of active therapy (14-21 days, median 14 days).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号