Ceftazidime-avibactam

头孢他啶 - 阿维巴坦
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一种新颖的KPC变体,从中国分离的肺炎克雷伯菌中鉴定出KPC-84,在Ambler位置243(T243P)上显示苏氨酸(T)到脯氨酸(P)的氨基酸取代,从KPC-2序列改变。blaKPC-84基因的克隆及其在大肠杆菌中的表达,随着随后的MIC评估,与KPC-2相比,对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦的抗性增加,碳青霉烯酶活性显着降低。动力学测量表明,与KPC-2相比,KPC-84表现出更高的头孢他啶水解率和对阿维巴坦的亲和力降低。这项研究强调了具有头孢他啶-阿维巴坦抗性的KPC变体的新兴多样性,强调解决耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌感染的复杂性。
    A novel KPC variant, KPC-84, identified in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from China, exhibits a threonine (T) to proline (P) amino acid substitution at Ambler position 243(T243P), altering from the KPC-2 sequence. Cloning and expression of blaKPC-84 in Escherichia coli, with subsequent MIC assessments, revealed increased resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and significantly reduced carbapenemase activity compared to KPC-2. Kinetic measurements showed that KPC-84 exhibited sligthly higher hydrolysis of ceftazidime and reduced affinity for avibactam compared to KPC-2. This study emphasizes the emerging diversity of KPC variants with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, underscoring the complexity of addressing carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药的产KPC肺炎克雷伯菌被报道,KPC变异体的检出率显著提高。然而,KPC突变过程中的进化机制和适应性效应尚不清楚.这里,我们报告了两个新的KPC变体的复杂体内进化轨迹,KPC-155(L169P/GT242A)和KPC-185(D179Y/GT242A),来自同一患者的肺炎克雷伯菌。根据质粒转化试验的结果,新的变体被证明赋予头孢他啶-阿维巴坦抗性,但恢复碳青霉烯敏感性。克隆实验,和酶动力学测量。体外竞争实验强调了携带这些KPC变体的菌株赋予的适应性优势,这可能导致这些头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药菌株的快速传播。生长曲线表明,与blaKPC-155相比,blaKPC-185在较低的阿维巴坦浓度下具有更好的生长条件,这与在体内使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦一致。此外,IS26侧翼转位单元(IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26)的复制转座也有助于blaKPC扩增和形成两个拷贝(blaKPC-2和blaKPC-185),同时赋予碳青霉烯类和头孢他啶-阿维巴坦抗性。然而,具有双拷贝的菌株显示出降低的竞争优势和构型稳定性。IS26组(IS26-blaKPC-IS26)和Tn1721组(Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26)的比较质粒分析显示,IS26插入可能会影响抗性基因的分布和自结合能力。blaKPC构型的动态变化突出表明需要在临床治疗期间进行一致的监测,包括抗菌药物敏感性测试和确定blaKPC亚型。尤其是服用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦时。
    More and more ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae have been reported with its widespread use, and the detection rate of KPC variants has increased dramatically. However, the evolutionary mechanism and fitness effects during KPC mutation remained unknown. Here, we report the complex in vivo evolutionary trajectories of two novel KPC variants, KPC-155 (L169P/GT242A) and KPC-185 (D179Y/GT242A), from K. pneumoniae in the same patient. The novel variants were shown to confer ceftazidime-avibactam resistance but restore carbapenem susceptibility based on the results of plasmid transformation assays, cloning experiments, and enzyme kinetic measurements. In vitro, competition experiments highlighted the adaptive advantage conferred by strains carrying these KPC variants, which could lead to the rapid spread of these ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains. The growth curve indicated that blaKPC-185 had better growth conditions at lower avibactam concentration compared to blaKPC-155, which was consistent with ceftazidime-avibactam use in vivo. In addition, replicative transposition of the IS26-flanked translocatable unit (IS26-ISKpn6-blaKPC-ISKpn27-IS26) also contributes to the blaKPC amplification and formation of two copies (blaKPC-2 and blaKPC-185), conferring both carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. However, strains with double copies showed reduced competitive advantage and configuration stability. The comparative plasmid analysis of IS26 group (IS26-blaKPC-IS26) and Tn1721 group (Tn1721-blaKPC-IS26) revealed that IS26-insertion could influence the distribution of resistance genes and ability of self-conjugation. The dynamic changes in blaKPC configuration highlight the need for consistent monitoring including antimicrobial susceptibility testing and determination of blaKPC subtypes - during clinical treatment, especially when ceftazidime-avibactam is administered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了监测耐药率并更深入地了解耐药机制,我们在教学医院进行了为期2年的监测,重点关注与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)临床使用相关的肺炎克雷伯菌.共筛选了4,641株肺炎克雷伯菌,通过药敏试验鉴定CZA耐药性。综合分析,包括同源性分析,共轭实验,克隆试验,和全基因组测序,进一步对CZA抗性菌株进行了研究。总的来说,从4名患者中分离出4株CZA耐药肺炎克雷伯菌(CZA-R-Kp),其中三人在住院期间接受了CZA治疗,占CZA应激下肺炎克雷伯菌抗性发展率的4%(3/75)。发现所有CZA-R-Kp分离株都具有blaKPC-2的变体。鉴定的突变包括blaKPC-33、blaKPC-86和命名为blaKPC-129的新变体,所有这些都位于KPC酶的Ω环中。发现这些突变会影响酶活性中心的氨基酸序列和空间结构,从而影响KPC碳青霉烯酶活性。这项研究强调了主动监测对CZA耐药性出现的重要性,强调需要正在进行的研究,以制定有效的策略来对抗抗菌素耐药性。了解耐药背后的机制对于维持CZA的疗效至关重要,对抗多重耐药感染的重要工具。重要作为治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌的有效药物,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)近年来开始产生耐药性,并呈增加趋势。为了有效监测CZA的耐药率,了解其耐药机制,我们监测肺炎克雷伯菌超过2年,以发现CZA耐药菌株。通过对筛选出的CZA耐药菌株的综合分析,发现所有CZA抗性菌株都有突变,这可能会影响KPC碳青霉烯酶的活性。这项研究强调了主动监测对监测CZA耐药性出现的重要性。这凸显了正在进行的研究以制定有效的策略来对抗抗菌素耐药性的必要性。了解抵抗背后的机制对于保持CZA的有效性至关重要,对抗多重耐药感染的重要工具。
    To monitor the resistance rate and gain a deeper understanding of the resistance mechanisms, we conducted over a 2-year surveillance focusing on the Klebsiella pneumoniae associated with the clinical usage of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in a teaching hospital. A total of 4,641 K. pneumoniae isolates were screened to identify the CZA resistance through antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Comprehensive analyses, including homology analysis, conjugation experiments, clone assays, and whole genome sequencing, were furtherly performed on the CZA-resistant strains. In total, four CZA-resistant K. pneumoniae (CZA-R-Kp) strains were separated from four patients, in which three of them received CZA treatment during the hospitalization, accounting for a 4% (3/75) resistance development rate of K. pneumoniae under CZA stress. All CZA-R-Kp isolates were found to possess variants of blaKPC-2. The identified mutations included blaKPC-33, blaKPC-86, and a novel variant designated as blaKPC-129, all of which were located in the Ω loop of the KPC enzyme. These mutations were found to impact the amino acid sequence and spatial structure of the enzyme\'s active center, consequently affecting KPC carbapenemase activity. This study underscores the importance of active surveillance to monitor the emergence of resistance to CZA, highlighting the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies for combating antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is crucial in maintaining the efficacy of CZA, a vital tool in the battle against multidrug-resistant infections.IMPORTANCEAs an effective drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) began to develop resistance in recent years and showed an increasing trend. In order to effectively monitor the resistance rate of CZA and understand its resistance mechanism, we monitored K. pneumoniae for more than 2 years to find CZA-resistant strains. Through comprehensive analysis of the selected CZA-resistant strains, it was found that all the CZA-resistant strains had mutation, which could affect the activity of KPC carbapenemase. This study highlights the importance of proactive surveillance to monitor the emergence of CZA resistance, which highlights the need for ongoing research to develop effective strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Understanding the mechanisms behind resistance is critical to maintaining the effectiveness of CZA, an important tool in the fight against multidrug-resistant infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)感染是全球公共卫生的巨大威胁。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)是一种有效的抗CRKP的β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂。然而,对CZA的抗性报告,主要由肺炎克雷伯菌碳青霉烯酶(KPC)变异体引起,近年来有所增加。在这项研究中,我们的目的是描述KPC-12的耐药特征,这是一种从CZA耐药肺炎克雷伯菌中鉴定出的新型KPC变异体.
    从呼吸道感染患者收集的肺炎克雷伯菌YFKP-97在IlluminaNovaSeq6000平台上进行了全基因组测序(WGS)。使用生物信息学方法分析基因组特征。通过肉汤微量稀释法进行抗菌药敏感性测试。如前所述在体外进行抗性菌株的诱导。采用G.mellonella杀灭试验评价菌株的致病性,并进行接合实验以评估质粒转移能力。
    菌株YFKP-97是一种多重耐药的临床ST11-KL47肺炎克雷伯菌,对CZA(16/4μg/mL)具有高度耐药性。WGS透露,KPC变体,KPC-12由IncFII(pHN7A8)质粒(pYFKP-97_a和pYFKP-97_b)携带,对碳青霉烯类抗生素的活性显着降低。此外,blaKPC-12对其对头孢他啶的活性具有剂量依赖性作用.体外诱导型抗性测定结果表明,KPC-12变体比KPC-2和KPC-3变体更可能赋予对CZA的抗性。
    我们的研究表明,未接受CZA治疗的患者也可能感染具有新型KPC变体的CZA抗性菌株。鉴于携带blaKPC-12的转化体更可能表现出CZA抗性表型。因此,尽早准确识别KPC变异非常重要.
    UNASSIGNED: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a great threat to public health worldwide. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is an effective β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors against CRKP. However, reports of resistance to CZA, mainly caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants, have increased in recent years. In this study, we aimed to describe the resistance characteristics of KPC-12, a novel KPC variant identified from a CZA resistant K. pneumoniae.
    UNASSIGNED: The K. pneumoniae YFKP-97 collected from a patient with respiratory tract infection was performed whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform. Genomic characteristics were analyzed using bioinformatics methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted by the broth microdilution method. Induction of resistant strain was carried out in vitro as previously described. The G. mellonella killing assay was used to evaluate the pathogenicity of strains, and the conjugation experiment was performed to evaluate plasmid transfer ability.
    UNASSIGNED: Strain YFKP-97 was a multidrug-resistant clinical ST11-KL47 K. pneumoniae confers high-level resistance to CZA (16/4 μg/mL). WGS revealed that a KPC variant, KPC-12, was carried by the IncFII (pHN7A8) plasmids (pYFKP-97_a and pYFKP-97_b) and showed significantly decreased activity against carbapenems. In addition, there was a dose-dependent effect of bla KPC-12 on its activity against ceftazidime. In vitro inducible resistance assay results demonstrated that the KPC-12 variant was more likely to confer resistance to CZA than the KPC-2 and KPC-3 variants.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study revealed that patients who was not treated with CZA are also possible to be infected with CZA-resistant strains harbored a novel KPC variant. Given that the transformant carrying bla KPC-12 was more likely to exhibit a CZA-resistance phenotype. Therefore, it is important to accurately identify the KPC variants as early as possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些队列研究探讨了多粘菌素B(PMB)与其他抗生素治疗医院感染的效果和安全性,产生不一致的结果。本系统评价旨在探讨PMB的有效性和安全性,并将其与其他抗生素进行比较。
    在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,和WebofScience,搜索特定术语以确定定量队列研究或RCT,这些研究或RCT比较了PMB与其他抗生素的疗效和安全性.采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估观察性研究偏倚的风险。使用95%置信区间的赔率比进行结果评估。我们使用I2检验评估异质性。
    共22项观察性试验纳入分析。与对照组相比,PMB组的死亡率更高(比值比:1.84,95%CI:1.36-2.50,p<0.00001,I2=73%)。while,头孢他啶-阿维巴坦组表现出明显的优势,死亡率较低,尽管仍表现出较高的异质性(比值比2.73,95%置信区间1.59-4.69;p=0.0003;I2=53%)。此外,与粘菌素组相比,PMB组的肾毒性率较低,但结果具有高度异质性(比值比0.58,95%CI0.36~0.93;p=0.02;I2=73%).
    在医院感染患者中,PMB在死亡率方面并不优于其他抗生素,特别是与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦相比。然而,与粘菌素相比,PMB在肾毒性方面表现出优势。
    UNASSIGNED: Some cohort studies have explored the effects and safety of polymyxin B (PMB) in comparison to other antibiotics for the treatment of nosocomial infections, yielding inconsistent results. This systematic review aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of PMB and compared it with other antibiotics.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, searching specific terms to identify quantitative cohort studies or RCTs that compared the effects of PMB with other antibiotics in terms of their efficacy and safety. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was conducted to evaluate the risk of bias of observational studies. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used for outcome assessment. We evaluated heterogeneity using the I 2 test.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 22 observational trials were included in the analysis. The PMB group had a higher mortality rate compared to the control group (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.36-2.50, p<0.00001, I 2 = 73%). while, the ceftazidime-avibactam group demonstrated a distinct advantage with lower mortality rates, despite still exhibiting high heterogeneity (odds ratio 2.73, 95% confidence interval 1.59-4.69; p = 0.0003; I 2 = 53%). Additionally, the PMB group had a lower nephrotoxicity rate compared to the colistin group but exhibited high heterogeneity in the results (odds ratio 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; p = 0.02; I 2 = 73%).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients with nosocomial infections, PMB is not superior to other antibiotics in terms of mortality, specifically when compared to ceftazidime-avibactam. However, PMB demonstrated an advantage in terms of nephrotoxicity compared to colistin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)特别是耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)的快速传播对全球公共卫生构成了巨大威胁。头孢他啶-阿维巴坦,一种新型β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,由于其对产生KPC的肺炎克雷伯菌具有优异的抗菌活性,因此已被广泛使用。然而,自使用以来,已经报道了几种抗性机制。这里,我们进行了一系列体外实验,以揭示和证明头孢他啶-阿维巴坦抗性的动态演变,包括阴沟肠球菌和肺炎克雷伯菌之间的种间IncX3_NDM-5质粒转移和blaKPC突变从blaKPC-2到blaKPC-33。通过对共轭频率和健身成本的分析,本研究中的IncX3_NDM-5质粒在作为受体菌株的大肠杆菌EC600和临床菌株肺炎克雷伯菌5298中显示出强的可传播性和稳定性。随着头孢他啶-阿维巴坦浓度的增加,在相同浓度下,肺炎克雷伯菌5298的结合频率保持在10-3-10-5,而突变频率为10-6-10-8。进一步的质粒分析(来自本研究的IncX3_NDM质粒和来自NCBI数据库的其他658个质粒)揭示了携带blaNDM-5的质粒的不同起源和遗传结构。大肠杆菌(42.9%),中国(43.9%),IncX3(66.6%)是最常见的菌株,regions,和Inc分别类型。通过分析IncX3质粒中检测到的遗传环境,确定了主要结构(168/258,65.1%):ISKox3-IS26-blaNDM-5-IS5-ISAba125-Tn3000-Tn3。另外,在核心基因结构中发现了几种结构变异。总之,IncX3_NDM-5质粒的高适应性和可传输性值得注意。更重要的是,不同的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药机制,包括blaNDM-5转运和blaKPC-2突变,突出了头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗期间持续监测抗菌药物敏感性和碳青霉烯酶亚型的重要性.
    The rapid dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) especially carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a great threat to global public health. Ceftazidime-avibactam, a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has been widely used due to its excellent antibacterial activity against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. However, several resistance mechanisms have been reported since its use. Here, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments to reveal and demonstrate the dynamic evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance including interspecies IncX3_NDM-5 plasmid transfer between Enterobacter cloacae and K. pneumoniae and blaKPC mutation from blaKPC-2 to blaKPC-33. Through the analysis of conjugation frequency and fitness cost, the IncX3_NDM-5 plasmid in this study showed strong transmissibility and stability in E. coli EC600 and clinical strain K. pneumoniae 5298 as recipient strain. With increasing ceftazidime-avibactam concentration, the conjugation frequency remained at 10-3-10-5, while the mutation frequency of K. pneumoniae 5298 was 10-6-10-8 at the same concentration. Further plasmid analysis (the IncX3_NDM plasmid from this study and other 658 plasmids from the NCBI database) revealed the diverse origin and genetic structure of blaNDM-5 carrying plasmids. E. coli (42.9%), China (43.9%), IncX3 (66.6%) are the most common strains, regions, and Inc types respectively. By analysing of genetic environment detected in IncX3 plasmids, the dominant structures (168/258, 65.1%) were identified: ISKox3-IS26-blaNDM-5-IS5-ISAba125-Tn3000-Tn3. In additon, several structural variations were found in the core gene structure. In conclusion, the high fitness and transmissibility of the IncX3_NDM-5 plasmids were noteworthy. More importantly, the diverse ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mechanisms including blaNDM-5 tranfer and blaKPC-2 mutation highlighted the importance of the continuous monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility and carbapenemases subtype during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    blaKPC-2基因突变导致的头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性在临床上越来越多地被证实。在这项研究中,我们表征了导致携带blaKPC-135基因的ST11-K47高毒力肺炎克雷伯菌对头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性发展的机制。该菌株具有菌毛和生物膜,证明致病性。与野生型KPC-2碳青霉烯酶相比,新型KPC-135酶显示Glu168和Leu169的缺失,以及Val262和Ala276之间的15个氨基酸串联重复。blaKPC-135基因位于由IS26截短的Tn6296转座子内,并携带在IncFII/IncR型质粒上。与blaKPC-2阳性克隆菌株相比,只有头孢他啶对blaKPC-135阳性肺炎克雷伯菌的MIC增加,并且不被阿维巴坦(MIC32μg/mL)抑制,而克拉维酸和伐巴坦则表现出一定的抑制作用。动力学参数显示KPC-135在头孢他啶和碳青霉烯类中表现出较低的Km和kcat/Km,与KPC-2相比,阿维巴坦的抑制浓度更高(~26倍)50%。相对于野生型菌株,KPC-135酶对适应性产生不利影响。此外,这个菌株具有高毒力的决定簇,其中包括具有rmpA2的IncHI1B/FIB质粒以及1型和3型菌毛的表达。总之,我们报道了一个新的KPC变种,KPC-135,在临床ST11-K47高毒力肺炎克雷伯菌菌株中,赋予头孢他啶-阿维巴坦耐药性,可能通过增加头孢他啶亲和力和降低阿维巴坦敏感性。该菌株同时具有抗性和毒力基因,在临床治疗中提出了更高的挑战。
    Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance attributable to the blaKPC-2 gene mutation is increasingly documented in clinical settings. In this study, we characterized the mechanisms leading to the development of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in ST11-K47 hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae that harboured the blaKPC-135 gene. This strain possessed fimbriae and biofilm, demonstrating pathogenicity. Compared with the wild-type KPC-2 carbapenemase, the novel KPC-135 enzyme exhibited a deletion of Glu168 and Leu169 and a 15-amino acid tandem repeat between Val262 and Ala276. The blaKPC-135 gene was located within the Tn6296 transposon truncated by IS26 and carried on an IncFII/IncR-type plasmid. Compared to the blaKPC-2-positive cloned strain, only the MIC of ceftazidime increased against blaKPC-135-positive K. pneumoniae and wasn\'t inhibited by avibactam (MIC 32 μg/mL), while clavulanic acid and vaborbactam demonstrated some inhibition. Kinetic parameters revealed that KPC-135 exhibited a lower Km and kcat/Km with ceftazidime and carbapenems, and a higher (∼26-fold) 50% inhibitory concentration with avibactam compared to KPC-2. The KPC-135 enzyme exerted a detrimental effect on fitness relative to the wild-type strain. Furthermore, this strain possessed hypervirulent determinants, which included the IncHI1B/FIB plasmid with rmpA2 and expression of type 1 and 3 fimbriae. In conclusion, we reported a novel KPC variant, KPC-135, in a clinical ST11-K47 hypervirulent K. pneumoniae strain, which conferred ceftazidime-avibactam resistance, possibly through increased ceftazidime affinity and decreased avibactam susceptibility. This strain simultaneously harboured resistance and virulence genes, posing an elevated challenge in clinical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头孢他啶-阿维巴坦是碳青霉烯耐药革兰阴性杆菌(CR-GNB)感染的一种治疗选择。然而,肾移植(KT)受者与头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CAZ-AVI)治疗失败相关的危险因素以及是否需要基于CAZ-AVI的联合治疗仍不清楚.
    从2019年6月至2023年12月,对接受CAZ-AVI治疗的CR-GNB感染的KT接受者进行了回顾性观察研究,主要结局是30天死亡率,次要结局是临床治愈,微生物治疗,和安全。还研究了30天死亡率和临床失败的危险因素。
    本研究包括总共81名接受CAZ-AVI治疗的KT接受者。40例(49.4%)接受CAZ-AVI单药治疗,30天死亡率为22.2%。CAZ/AVI治疗的临床治愈率和微生物治愈率分别为72.8%和66.7%,分别。CAZ-AVI单独或与其他药物组合对临床治愈或30天死亡率没有影响。多因素logistic回归分析显示,较高的急性生理和慢性健康评估(APACHE)II评分(比值比[OR]:4.517;95%置信区间[CI]:1.397-14.607;P=0.012)是30天死亡率的独立危险因素。临床治愈与感染发作48小时内给予CAZ-AVI呈正相关(OR:11.009;95%CI:1.344-90.197;P=0.025),与较高的APACHEII评分呈负相关(OR:0.700;95%CI:0.555-0.882;P=0.002)。4名(4.9%)受者在初次感染后90天内出现复发,3名(3.7%)受者经历了CAZ-AVI相关的不良事件,没有发现CAZ-AVI耐药性。
    CAZ-AVI是治疗肾移植后CR-GNB感染的有效药物,甚至作为单一疗法。CAZ/AVI治疗的优化(在感染发作的48小时内使用)与潜在的临床益处正相关。需要更大规模的研究来验证这些发现。
    UNASSIGNED: Ceftazidime-avibactam is a treatment option for carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) infections. However, the risk factors associated with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) treatment failure in kidney transplant (KT) recipients and the need for CAZ-AVI-based combination therapy remain unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: From June 2019 to December 2023, a retrospective observational study of KT recipients with CR-GNB infection treated with CAZ-AVI was conducted, with the primary outcome being 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes being clinical cure, microbiological cure, and safety. Risk factors for 30-day mortality and clinical failure were also investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 81 KT recipients treated with CAZ-AVI were included in this study. Forty recipients (49.4%) received CAZ-AVI monotherapy, with a 30-day mortality of 22.2%. The clinical cure and microbiological cure rates of CAZ/AVI therapy were 72.8% and 66.7%, respectively. CAZ-AVI alone or in combination with other medications had no effect on clinical cure or 30-day mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (odds ratio [OR]: 4.517; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.397-14.607; P = 0.012) was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality. Clinical cure was positively associated with the administration of CAZ-AVI within 48 hours of infection onset (OR: 11.009; 95% CI: 1.344-90.197; P=0.025) and negatively associated with higher APACHE II scores (OR: 0.700; 95% CI: 0.555-0.882; P=0.002). Four (4.9%) recipients experienced recurrence within 90 days after the initial infection, 3 (3.7%) recipients experienced CAZ-AVI-related adverse events, and no CAZ-AVI resistance was identified.
    UNASSIGNED: CAZ-AVI is an effective medication for treating CR-GNB infections following kidney transplantation, even as monotherapy. Optimization of CAZ/AVI therapy (used within 48 hours of infection onset) is positively associated with potential clinical benefit. Further larger-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)用于治疗由产生碳青霉烯酶的肺炎克雷伯菌(KPC-KP)引起的感染。对CZA的抗性通常与blaKPC中的点突变有关。我们使用CZA进行了体内blaKPC突变的体外模拟。评估了四种治疗前KPC-KP分离株(K1、K2、K3和K4),所有患者最初均表现出对CZA的易感性,并产生KPC-2.关键的区别是在CZA治疗之后,blaKPC-2在K1,K2和K3中突变,使它们对CZA具有抗性,而K4实现了微生物清除,BlaKPC-2保持不变.诱导测定鉴定了各种blaKPC-2变体,包括blaKPC-25、blaKPC-127、blaKPC-100、blaKPC-128、blaKPC-137、blaKPC-138、blaKPC-144和blaKPC-180。我们的研究结果表明,KPC-KP对CZA的抗性主要来自KPC变体的出现,补充blaKPC表达增加。阿维巴坦浓度与CZA最低抑制浓度增加速率之间存在密切的相关性,以及blaKPC突变。阿维巴坦浓度不足更可能诱导菌株对CZA的抗性,blaKPC-2突变的可能性也较高,最佳阿维巴坦比值尚待确定.同时,我们选择了一个产生blaKPC-33的肺炎克雷伯菌菌株(从blaKPC-2突变),并用亚胺培南和美罗培南诱导它,分别。在此过程中检测到blaKPC-2,表明突变是可逆的。临床使用碳青霉烯类抗生素治疗KPC变异株增加了感染的风险,因为该基因可以突变回blaKPC-2,使菌株对碳青霉烯类和CZA更具交叉抗性。
    Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the blaKPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo blaKPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the blaKPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and blaKPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various blaKPC-2 variants, including blaKPC-25, blaKPC-127, blaKPC-100, blaKPC-128, blaKPC-137, blaKPC-138, blaKPC-144 and blaKPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased blaKPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as blaKPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the blaKPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a blaKPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from blaKPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The blaKPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to blaKPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估头孢他啶-阿维巴坦(CZA)与各种抗菌药物联合应用对耐碳青霉烯类肺炎克雷伯菌(CRKP)的体外疗效。我们选择了59个含有不同耐药机制的临床CRKP分离株。美罗培南(MEM)的最低抑制浓度(MIC),粘菌素(COL),eravacycline(ERA),阿米卡星(AK),磷霉素(FOS),和氨曲南(ATM),无论是单独还是与CZA结合,使用棋盘方法进行了测试。通过分数抑制浓度指数(FICI)和易感断点指数(SBPI)评估抗微生物剂组合的相互作用。时间-杀死曲线测定用于动态评估这些药物单独和组合形式的作用。在棋盘分析中,CZA+MEM的组合对产生KPC和不产生碳青霉烯酶的分离株显示出最高水平的协同作用,协同率为91.3%和100%,分别。紧随其后的是FOS+CZA的组合。对于产生金属β-内酰胺酶(MBL)的菌株,ATM+CZA显示出完全的协同作用,而MEM+CZA组合对NDM产生菌株的协同率仅为57.14%,对IMP产生菌株的协同率仅为91.67%。在时间杀伤分析中,MEM+CZA对两种产KPC-2的分离株(Y070和L70)也表现出显著的协同作用,两个不产生碳青霉烯酶的分离株(Y083和L093),和产生NDM-1的菌株L13,与对照相比,log10CFU/mL的降低超过10。对产IMP菌株Y047,ATM+CZA表现出最高的协同作用,与对照相比,log10CFU/mL降低了10.43。CZA和MEM的组合对产KPC和非产酶菌株具有良好的协同作用。其次是FOS+CZA组合。在MBL产生菌株中,ATM+CZA表现出最显著的协同作用。然而,CZA与ERA的组合,AK,和COL对测试的临床分离株显示不相关的作用。
    目的:我们的研究证实了CZA+MEM组合对产KPC和非产碳青霉烯酶菌株的疗效。对于产生金属酶的菌株,CZA+ATM表现出最显著的协同作用。此外,CZA与FOS组合时表现出显著的协同作用。这些联合疗法为CRKP感染的治疗提供了有希望的新选择。
    This study aimed to assess the in vitro efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) in combination with various antimicrobial agents against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). We selected 59 clinical CRKP isolates containing distinct drug resistance mechanisms. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), eravacycline (ERA), amikacin (AK), fosfomycin (FOS), and aztreonam (ATM), both individually and in combination with CZA, were tested using the checkerboard method. The interactions of antimicrobial agent combinations were assessed by fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptible breakpoint index (SBPI). The time-kill curve assay was employed to dynamically evaluate the effects of these drugs alone and in combination format. In the checkerboard assay, the combination of CZA+MEM showed the highest level of synergistic effect against both KPC-producing and carbapenemase-non-producing isolates, with synergy rates of 91.3% and 100%, respectively. Following closely was the combination of FOS+CZA . For metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) producing strains, ATM+CZA displayed complete synergy, while the combination of MEM+CZA showed a synergy rate of only 57.14% for NDM-producing strains and 91.67% for IMP-producing strains. In the time-kill assay, MEM+CZA also demonstrated significant synergistic effects against the two KPC-2-producing isolates (Y070 and L70), the two carbapenemase-non-producing isolates (Y083 and L093), and the NDM-1-producing strain L13, with reductions in log10 CFU/mL exceeding 10 compared to the control. Against the IMP-producing strain Y047, ATM+CZA exhibited the highest synergistic effect, resulting in a log10 CFU/mL reduction of 10.43 compared to the control. The combination of CZA and MEM exhibited good synergistic effects against KPC-producing and non-enzyme-producing strains, followed by the FOS+CZA combination. Among MBL-producing strains, ATM+CZA demonstrated the most pronounced synergistic effect. However, the combinations of CZA with ERA, AK, and COL show irrelevant effects against the tested clinical isolates.
    OBJECTIVE: Our study confirmed the efficacy of the combination CZA+MEM against KPC-producing and non-carbapenemase-producing strains. For metalloenzyme-producing strains, CZA+ATM demonstrated the most significant synergy. Additionally, CZA exhibited a notable synergy effect when combined with FOS. These combination therapies present promising new options for the treatment of CRKP infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号