UNASSIGNED: Many techniques and technologies exist for the intraoperative assessment of component positioning, leg lengths, and offset in total hip arthroplasty, but with limited comparative data. We conducted a systematic review of the available literature to evaluate the range of techniques and technologies for the intraoperative assessment of component position as well as leg lengths and offset in terms of accuracy, precision, surgical time, cost, and relationship to clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search of the Embase and Medline databases from 1974 to 2023 was performed. We included controlled or comparative prospective clinical studies. Cochrane\'s risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials and Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions tools were used by 2 independent reviewers to evaluate each study for risk of bias. We conducted both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the studies included. However, a meta-analysis was deemed not to be feasible due to heterogeneity.
UNASSIGNED: Our review included 25 studies with 52 intraoperative techniques and technologies. Mechanical guides and computerized navigation were most frequently evaluated in the included studies. Computerized navigation systems consistently showed the greatest accuracy and precision across all measures, at the cost of longer mean operative time. In contrast, freehand techniques demonstrated the poorest accuracy and precision. Insufficient data were found to reach any meaningful conclusions in terms of differences in overall surgical cost or clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Evidence shows that computerized navigation systems are most accurate and precise in positioning components during total hip arthroplasty. Further research is needed to determine their health and economic impact and whether the accuracy and precision of navigated techniques are justified in terms of clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Few literature reviews have been published focusing on navigation, robotic or pre-operative planning using 3D-imaging technology (3D-printing, 3D-planning). To our knowledge, no reviews have been performed to assess and compare all these modalities together versus control groups (conventional fluoroscopy) through high Randomized Control Trials (RCTs) and Prospective Control Studies (PCSs). The aim of this study was to assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures through high level studies.
METHODS: A literature search was performed using PubMed, the Cochrane library and Google scholar using keywords up to December 2023. Only prospective comparative studies (RCT and PCS) were included. A total of 341 articles were identified, 39 articles were selected for full-text analysis leaving 7 articles included in this literature systematic review.
RESULTS: A trend towards improved precision in screw placement and reduction of radiation exposure without consequences in term of functional outcomes have been identified. No conclusions can be extrapolated regarding operative time and blood loss except for robotic which improve these parameters because robotic arm assistance help surgeons to correctly follow the planning based on 2D-fluoroscopy. Surgery duration and radiation dose are significantly reduced with robotic-arm assistance for the same reasons. With navigation the results have to be nuanced according to the experience of the surgical team. Interest of navigation is emphasized in sacral dysmorphism in comparison with conventional fluoroscopy. This highlights the benefits of navigation for ilio-sacral screw placement in difficult cases and less experimented teams.
CONCLUSIONS: High level studies which assess and compare 3D-imaging technologies from pre-operative planning to per-operative navigation and robotic in the management of pelvic ring fractures are low. To date and according to the present high level literature, navigation and 3D-technologies in pelvic ring surgery should be recommended for difficult cases.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review of Level II studies.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge on the role of the metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed using the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive review of the applications of the metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality in in-vivo intraoperative navigation, in the training of orthopedic residents, and in the latest innovations proposed in ex-vivo studies was conducted.
RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included in the review. Data on navigated shoulder arthroplasty was extracted from 14 articles: seven hundred ninety-three patients treated with intraoperative navigated rTSA or aTSA were included. Also, three randomized control trials (RCTs) reported outcomes on a total of fifty-three orthopedics surgical residents and doctors receiving VR-based training for rTSA, which were also included in the review. Three studies reporting the latest VR and AR-based rTSA applications and two proof of concept studies were also included in the review.
CONCLUSIONS: The metaverse, augmented reality, and virtual reality present immense potential for the future of orthopedic surgery. As these technologies advance, it is crucial to conduct additional research, foster development, and seamlessly integrate them into surgical education to fully harness their capabilities and transform the field. This evolution promises enhanced accuracy, expanded training opportunities, and improved surgical planning capabilities.

Objectives and Background: To present a novel technique of treatment for a patient with basilar invagination. Basilar invagination (BI) is a congenital condition that can compress the cervicomedullary junction, leading to neurological deficits. Severe cases require surgical intervention, but there is debate over the choice of approach. The anterior approach allows direct decompression but carries high complication rates, while the posterior approach provides indirect decompression and offers good stability with fewer complications. Materials and Methods: A 15-year-old boy with severe myelopathy presented to our hospital with neck pain, bilateral upper limb muscle weakness, and hand numbness persisting for 4 years. Additionally, he experienced increased numbness and gait disturbance three months before his visit. On examination, he exhibited hyperreflexia in both upper and lower limbs, muscle weakness in the bilateral upper limbs (MMT 4), bilateral hypoesthesia below the elbow and in both legs, mild urinary and bowel incontinence, and a spastic gait. Radiographs revealed severe basilar invagination (BI). Preoperative images showed severe BI and that the spinal cord was severely compressed with odontoid process. Results: The patient underwent posterior surgery with the C-arm free technique. All screws including occipital screws were inserted into the adequate position under navigation guidance. Reduction was achieved with skull rotation and distraction. A follow-up at one year showed the following results: Manual muscle testing results and sensory function tests showed almost full recovery, with bilateral arm recovery (MMT 5) and smooth walking. The cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score of the patient improved from 9/17 to 16/17. Postoperative images showed excellent spinal cord decompression, and no major or severe complications had occurred. Conclusions: Basilar invagination alongside Klippel-Feil syndrome represents a relatively uncommon condition. Utilizing a posterior approach for treating reducible BI with a C-arm-free technique proved to be a safe method in addressing severe myelopathy. This novel navigation technique yields excellent outcomes for patients with BI.

OBJECTIVE: The role of robotics in spine surgery remains controversial, especially for scoliosis correction surgery. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted (RA) surgery specifically for scoliosis surgery by comparing RA to both navigation systems (NS) and conventional freehand techniques (CF).
METHODS: As per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted via an electronic search of the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). All papers comparing RA to either NS or CF for posterior spinal fusion in scoliosis were included. Fixed and random effects models of analysis were utilised based on analysis heterogeneity.
RESULTS: 10 observational studies were included in total. RA had significantly greater odds of accurate pedicle screw placement relative to both NS (OR = 2.02, CI = 1.52-2.67, p < 0.00001) and CF (OR = 3.06, CI = 1.79-5.23, p < 0.00001). The downside of RA was the significantly greater operation duration relative to NS (MD = 10.74, CI = 3.52-17.97, p = 0.004) and CF (MD = 40.27, CI = 20.90, p < 0.0001). Perioperative outcomes including estimated blood loss, radiation exposure, length of hospital stay, cobb angle correction rate, postoperative SRS score, VAS pain score, JOA score, as well as rates of neurological injury and revision surgery, were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: RA offers significantly greater pedicle screw placement accuracy relative to NS and CF, however, surgery can take longer. In terms of perioperative outcomes, all three techniques are comparable.

The development of minimally invasive spinal surgery utilizing navigation and robotics has significantly improved the feasibility, accuracy, and efficiency of this surgery. In particular, these methods provide improved accuracy of pedicle screw placement, reduced radiation exposure, and shortened learning curves for surgeons. However, research on the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of navigation and robot-assisted spinal surgery is still in its infancy. Therefore, there is limited available evidence and this makes it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding the long-term benefits of these technologies. In this review article, we provide a summary of the current navigation and robotic spinal surgery systems. We concluded that despite the progress that has been made in recent years, and the clear advantages these methods can provide in terms of clinical outcomes and shortened learning curves, cost-effectiveness remains an issue. Therefore, future studies are required to consider training costs, variable initial expenses, maintenance and service fees, and operating costs of these advanced platforms so that they are feasible for implementation in standard clinical practice.

Wearable digital technologies capable of measuring everyday behaviors could improve the early detection of dementia-causing diseases. We conducted two systematic reviews following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to establish the evidence base for measuring navigation and gait, two everyday behaviors affected early in AD and non-AD disorders and not adequately measured in current practice. PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for studies on asymptomatic and early-stage symptomatic individuals at risk of dementia, with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale used to assess bias and evaluate methodological quality. Of 316 navigation and 2086 gait records identified, 27 and 83, respectively, were included in the final sample. We highlight several measures that may identify at-risk individuals, whose quantifiability with different devices mitigates the risk of future technological obsolescence. Beyond navigation and gait, this review also provides the framework for evaluating the evidence base for future digital measures of behaviors considered for early disease detection.

Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are powerful technologies with proven utility and tremendous potential. Spine surgery, in particular, may benefit from these developing technologies for resident training, preoperative education for patients, surgical planning and execution, and patient rehabilitation. In this review, the history, current applications, challenges, and future of AR/VR in spine surgery are examined.

Skull base surgery has evolved significantly since Harvey Cushing\'s first descriptions in the early 1900s. Computer aided surgery (CAS) applications continue to expand; they include virtual surgical planning, augmented and virtual reality, 3D printing of models/cutting guides/implants, surgical navigation, and intraoperative imaging. The authors will review the current skull base CAS literature and propose a computer aided surgical workflow categorizing these applications into 3 phases: 1) Virtual planning, 2) Surgical execution, 3) Intraoperative verification.

Background: Robot-assisted fracture reduction systems can potentially reduce the risk of infection and improve outcomes, leading to significant health and economic benefits. However, these systems are still in the laboratory stage and not yet ready for commercialization due to unresolved difficulties. While previous reviews have focused on individual technologies, system composition, and surgical stages, a comprehensive review is necessary to assist future scholars in selecting appropriate research directions for clinical use. Methods: A literature review using Google Scholar identified articles on robot-assisted fracture reduction systems. A comprehensive search yielded 17,800, 18,100, and 16,700 results for \"fracture reduction,\" \"computer-assisted orthopedic surgery,\" and \"robot-assisted fracture reduction,\" respectively. Approximately 340 articles were selected, and 90 highly relevant articles were chosen for further reading after reviewing the abstracts. Results and Conclusion: Robot-assisted fracture reduction systems offer several benefits, including improved reduction accuracy, reduced physical work and radiation exposure, enhanced preoperative planning and intraoperative visualization, and shortened learning curve for skill acquisition. In the future, these systems will become integrated and practical, with automatic preoperative planning and high intraoperative safety.