Social Perception

社会感知
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们对浪漫伴侣的看法有些准确,但也包含偏见。在当前的元分析综述中,我们试图检查浪漫伴侣感知的准确性和偏见的总体水平,以及准确性和偏见的调节因素。我们检查了跟踪精度(k=157),投影(k=157),间接精度(k=69),以及同时估计跟踪准确性和投影的样本中对浪漫伴侣的感知的均值水平偏差(k=153)。性别,关系长度,研究设计,地理区域,出版年份,和判断类型被视为潜在的调节者。结果表明,跟踪精度的平均效应大小显著(β=.24),投影(β=.42),相似性(β=.22),和间接精度(β=.11)。总的来说,即使结构在概念上被编码为阳性或阴性(d=-0.03),人们也倾向于具有平均水平的准确性(d=-0.006)。男人似乎更消极地看待他们的伴侣。出版年份和关系长度对任何感知过程都无关紧要。总体判断跟踪精度较高,而在日常判断中投影较高。积极的互动特征和读心术判断显示出消极的偏见。非交互判断中较大的投影和正偏差与较高的关系质量相关。我们的结果是第一个为投影提供效果大小的,跟踪精度,同时控制投影,和间接准确性,并建立在先前关于合作伙伴彼此感知的复杂方式的研究基础上。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023年APA,保留所有权利)。
    People\'s perceptions of their romantic partners are somewhat accurate but also contain biases. In the current meta-analytic review, we sought to examine overall levels of accuracy and bias in romantic partner perceptions and moderators of accuracy and bias. We examined tracking accuracy (k = 157), projection (k = 157), indirect accuracy (k = 69), and mean-level bias (k = 153) in perceptions of a romantic partner across samples that estimated tracking accuracy and projection simultaneously. Gender, relationship length, study design, geographic region, publication year, and judgment type were examined as potential moderators. Results revealed significant mean effect sizes for tracking accuracy (β = .24), projection (β = .42), similarity (β = .22), and indirect accuracy (β = .11). Overall, people tended to have mean-level accuracy (d = -0.006) even when constructs were coded as conceptually positive or negative (d = -0.03). Men seemed to view their partners more negatively. Publication year and relationship length did not matter for any perceptual process. Tracking accuracy was higher in overall judgments, whereas projection was higher in daily judgments. Positive interaction traits and mind-reading judgments showed a negative bias. Greater projection and positive bias in noninteraction judgments were associated with higher relationship quality. Our results are the first to provide effect sizes for projection, tracking accuracy while controlling for projection, and indirect accuracy, and build on prior research concerning the complex ways in which partners perceive each other. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    亨廷顿病(HD)患者在整个疾病中表现出神经认知改变,包括社会认知过程中的缺陷,如心理理论(ToM)。
    目的是确定HD中使用的方法和ToM仪器,除了相关发现,在过去二十年的科学文献中。
    我们对SCOPUS中的相关论文进行了全面搜索,PubMed,APA-PsyArticles,WebofScience,Redalyc,和SciELO数据库。在选择过程中,我们特别关注的研究包括具有已确认的HD遗传状态的个体,并调查了有或无运动症状的患者的ToM功能.系统评价遵循PRISMA方案。
    本次系统综述共选取了27篇论文,涵盖2003年至2023年期间。研究结果一致表明,在具有明显运动症状的患者中,ToM受到全球影响。在没有运动症状的个体中,损伤集中在ToM的情感维度上。
    根据我们的分析,情感ToM可以被认为是HD的潜在生物标志物。因此,建议将ToM评估作为临床环境中神经心理学评估方案的一部分.这种纳入可以帮助识别疾病的早期阶段,并提供新的治疗机会,特别是反义寡聚体等新兴药物。本次审查的Prospero注册号为CRD42020209769。
    UNASSIGNED: People with Huntington\'s disease (HD) exhibit neurocognitive alterations throughout the disease, including deficits in social cognitive processes such as Theory of Mind (ToM).
    UNASSIGNED: The aim is to identify methodologies and ToM instruments employed in HD, alongside relevant findings, within the scientific literature of the past two decades.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a comprehensive search for relevant papers in the SCOPUS, PubMed, APA-PsyArticles, Web of Science, Redalyc, and SciELO databases. In the selection process, we specifically focused on studies that included individuals with a confirmed genetic status of HD and investigated ToM functioning in patients with and without motor symptoms. The systematic review followed the PRISMA protocol.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 27 papers were selected for this systematic review, covering the period from 2003 to 2023. The findings consistently indicate that ToM is globally affected in patients with manifest motor symptoms. In individuals without motor symptoms, impairments are focused on the affective dimensions of ToM.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on our analysis, affective ToM could be considered a potential biomarker for HD. Therefore, it is recommended that ToM assessment be included as part of neuropsychological evaluation protocols in clinical settings. Suchinclusion could aid in the identification of early stages of the disease and provide new opportunities for treatment, particularly with emerging drugs like antisense oligomers. The Prospero registration number for this review is CRD42020209769.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对服装的认知是复杂的,因个体而异,情况,文化,和时间。尽管在我们这个领域对这个主题的研究很少,来自各种其他学科的证据表明服装在工作场所的重要性。在这篇文章中,我们回顾了这一证据,并确定了三个普遍和独特的服装特征:形式,挑衅,和时尚。我们还确定了另外两个类别:制服和服装的宗教信仰,与特定的社会群体联系在一起。借鉴归因理论和刻板印象内容模型,我们提供了一个有凝聚力的概念框架,其中服装特征通过观察者的性格归因过程影响观察者对穿着者温暖和能力的感知。这些感知,反过来,影响促进行为,例如为穿着者提供支持,和伤害行为,比如负面的绩效考核。最后,我们为未来的研究提供了建议,并在管理服装选择和避免潜在偏见方面对员工和雇主产生了影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023年APA,保留所有权利)。
    Perceptions of clothing are complex, varying across individuals, situations, cultures, and time. Although there is very little research on the topic in our field, evidence from a wide variety of other disciplines points to the importance of clothing in the workplace. In this article, we review this evidence and identify three universal and distinctive clothing characteristics at work: formality, provocativeness, and fashionability. We also identify two other categories: uniforms and religiosity of clothing, which are tied to particular social groups. Drawing on attribution theory and the stereotype content model, we provide a cohesive conceptual framework in which clothing characteristics influence observers\' perceptions of wearer\'s warmth and competence through observers\' dispositional attribution processes. These perceptions, in turn, influence facilitation behaviors, such as providing support to wearers, and harm behaviors, such as negatively biased performance appraisal. We conclude by offering suggestions for future research and implications for employees and employers with regard to managing clothing choices and avoiding potential biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)与社会功能缺陷有关,包括同伴困难和关系质量差。鲜为人知,然而,关于支持多动症人际交往的基础社会认知能力的完整性。面部处理-社会认知的基本组成部分-一直是该领域最近研究的热门话题。研究人员试图描述ADHD的面部处理机制,以阐明该疾病中经常出现的社会缺陷。调查N170事件相关电位,面部处理的神经标记,在这一努力中一直是一种流行的方法。这里,我们提出了两个账户,这些账户提供了关于多动症患者可能如何出现社会赤字的相互竞争的观点。接下来,我们系统地回顾并综合了有关ADHD中N170的文献,以确定该患者人群中是否存在诸如面部处理等社会认知领域的非典型现象.确定了文献中的差距,并提供了具体的解决方案来改善该领域的未来研究。最后,我们讨论了旨在解决ADHD患者广泛观察到的社会缺陷的治疗方法的直接影响。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023年APA,保留所有权利)。
    Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is associated with deficits in social functioning, including peer difficulties and poor relationship quality. Little is known, however, about the integrity of foundational sociocognitive abilities that support interpersonal interactions in ADHD. Face processing-a fundamental component of social cognition-has been a popular topic of recent investigations in this area. Researchers have attempted to delineate face processing mechanisms in ADHD to elucidate social deficits often seen in the disorder. Investigating the N170 event-related potential, a neural marker of face processing, has been a popular approach in this endeavour. Here, we present two accounts that offer competing views of how social deficits might arise in those with ADHD. Next, we systematically review and synthesise the literature on the N170 in ADHD to identify whether atypicalities in sociocognitive domains like face processing occur in this patient population. Gaps in the literature are identified and concrete solutions are offered to improve future research in this area. We end by discussing immediate implications for treatment approaches designed to address widely observed social deficits in individuals with ADHD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:本报告旨在比较自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)和精神分裂症在社会和非社会认知方面的群体差异,并考察年龄等因素对群体差异的影响。
    方法:文献检索于1980年1月至2022年8月在Pubmed和WebofScience中进行。选择了报告认知客观指标的原始研究文章。
    结果:已纳入57篇文章,涉及1864例精神分裂症患者和1716例ASD患者。精神分裂症与更严重的非社会认知障碍有关,特别是在流畅度(g=0.47;CI[0.17-0.76])和处理速度域(g=0.41;CI[0.20-0.62])。精神分裂症患者的社会认知(Z=3.68,p=0.0002)和非社会认知(Z=2.48,p=0.01)表现较差与年龄显着相关。当与非社会认知(g=-0.18,p=0.04)或推理/问题解决(g=-0,62;CI[-1,06-(-0.08)]相匹配时,ASD与更严重的社会认知障碍相关。
    结论:虽然这两种疾病都有社会和非社会认知障碍,这些赤字的模式和发展轨迹是不同的。局限性包括认知测量的异质性,以及缺乏关于抗精神病药物使用的足够信息。
    BACKGROUND: This report aimed to compare group differences in social and non-social cognition in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and schizophrenia, and examine the influence of age and other factors on group differences.
    METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in Pubmed and Web of Science from January 1980 to August 2022. Original research articles reporting objective measures of cognition were selected.
    RESULTS: 57 articles involving 1864 patients with schizophrenia and 1716 patients with ASD have been included. Schizophrenia was associated with more severe non-social-cognitive impairment, particularly in fluency (g=0.47;CI[0.17-0.76]) and processing speed domains (g=0.41;CI[0.20-0.62]). Poorer performance in social cognition (Z = 3.68,p = 0.0002) and non-social cognition (Z = 2.48,p = 0.01) in schizophrenia were significantly related to older age. ASD was associated with more severe social cognitive impairment when groups were matched for non-social-cognition (g=-0.18, p = 0.04) or reasoning/problem solving (g=-0,62; CI [-1,06-(-0.08)].
    CONCLUSIONS: While both disorders present with social and non-social cognitive impairments, the pattern and developmental trajectories of these deficits are different. The limitations included heterogeneity of the cognitive measures, and the lack of sufficient information about antipsychotic use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    在许多诊断为精神分裂症的个体中,社会功能在整个生命周期中都受到损害。社会认知已成为可能导致这些挑战的可能因素之一。神经影像学研究可以进一步了解社会(认知)困难的潜在机制。这篇综述总结了心理理论与情绪感知和加工领域的社会认知之间关联的证据,和个人的社会功能和社会技能,以及相关的神经机制。自该领域的最后一次主要综述和荟萃分析以来,进行了18项行为研究(纳入2017年7月1日至2022年1月)。尚无主要综述研究精神分裂症中社会认知的神经机制及其与社会功能的关联之间的联系。包括14项相关研究(从2000年1月1日至2022年1月1日)。行为研究的结果表明,心理理论与社会结果的关联比情绪感知和处理的关联略强。此外,与基于问卷的社区社会功能评估相比,两个社会认知领域的表现与社会技能指标的表现更密切相关.对这些关联的潜在神经底物的研究提出了不同的发现。总的来说,在社会大脑的各个区域中更高的激活与更好的社会功能相关。现有证据表明,一些共享区域可能是不同领域之间社会认知-社会结果联系的基础。然而,由于方法和发现的异质性,在得出明确的结论之前,需要扩大当前的知识库。
    In many individuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia social functioning is impaired across the lifespan. Social cognition has emerged as one of the possible factors that may contribute to these challenges. Neuroimaging research can give further insights into the underlying mechanisms of social (cognitive) difficulties. This review summarises the evidence on the associations between social cognition in the domains of theory of mind and emotion perception and processing, and individuals\' social functioning and social skills, as well as associated neural mechanisms. Eighteen behavioural studies were conducted since the last major review and meta-analysis in the field (inclusion between 7/2017 and 1/2022). No major review has investigated the link between the neural mechanisms of social cognition and their association with social functioning in schizophrenia. Fourteen relevant studies were included (from 1/2000 to 1/2022). The findings of the behavioural studies showed that associations with social outcomes were slightly stronger for theory of mind than for emotion perception and processing. Moreover, performance in both social cognitive domains was more strongly associated with performance on social skill measures than questionnaire-based assessment of social functioning in the community. Studies on the underlying neural substrate of these associations presented mixed findings. In general, higher activation in various regions of the social brain was associated with better social functioning. The available evidence suggests some shared regions that might underlie the social cognition-social outcome link between different domains. However, due to the heterogeneity in approaches and findings, the current knowledge base will need to be expanded before firm conclusions can be drawn.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:患有精神分裂症谱和相关精神病(SSD)的个体在社会认知方面经历了严重的损害,从而阻碍了功能。社会认知是由四个领域组成的多维结构:1.心理理论,2.情绪处理,3.归因风格和4。社会认知。元认知训练(MCT)是一种干预措施,旨在针对精神病中的认知偏见,其中包含两个解决社会认知的模块。
    方法:进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,以研究MCT对社会认知及其两个领域的影响:心理理论和情绪加工。从2007年到2022年2月1日,对十个电子数据库进行了搜索,用于MCT研究,报告了SSD患者的社会认知结果(1050确定,282评估)。使用R.中的Cohen'sd计算效应大小。
    结果:9项研究纳入荟萃分析(nMCT=212,ncontrol=194)。MCT对整体社会认知(d=0.28[95%CI0.07-0.49])和心理理论(d=0.27[95%CI0.01-0.52])有很小但积极的影响。MCT没有显示对情绪处理有影响的证据(d=0.03[95%CI-0.26至0.32])。
    结论:MCT对SSD患者的社会认知有微小但显著的影响。我们的结果添加到其他最近的荟萃分析中,显示MCT对临床相关结果的显着影响,例如阳性症状,认知偏见和认知洞察力。我们建议未来对MCT的研究报告社会认知的所有四个领域的结果。
    背景:PROSPERO(在注册过程中)可在https://www上获得。crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/#recordDetails.
    BACKGROUND: Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum and related psychotic disorders (SSD) experience significant impairments in social cognition that impede functioning. Social cognition is a multidimensional construct consisting of four domains: 1. theory of mind, 2. emotion processing, 3. attributional style and 4. social perception. Metacognitive training (MCT) is an intervention designed to target cognitive biases in psychosis containing two modules addressing social cognition.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effects of MCT on social cognition and two of its domains: theory of mind and emotion processing. Ten electronic databases were scoured from 2007 to 1 February 2022 for MCT studies reporting social cognition outcomes for people with SSD (1050 identified, 282 assessed). Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen\'s d in R.
    RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis (nMCT = 212, ncontrol = 194). MCT had a small but positive effect on global social cognition (d = 0.28 [95% CI 0.07-0.49]) and theory of mind (d = 0.27 [95% CI 0.01-0.52]). MCT showed no evidence of an effect on emotion processing (d = 0.03 [95% CI -0.26 to 0.32]).
    CONCLUSIONS: MCT has a small but significant effect on social cognition for people with SSD. Our results add to other recent meta-analyses showing significant effects of MCT on clinically relevant outcomes such as positive symptoms, cognitive biases and cognitive insight. We recommend that future studies on MCT report outcomes on all four domains of social cognition.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO (in the process of registration) available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    许多研究表明,我们的社交大脑涉及皮质和皮质下脑区域的网络,这些区域负责感知和控制身体运动。然而,目前尚不清楚运动障碍是否会对社会认知产生系统性影响.为了解决这个问题,我们进行了一项系统评价,检查多动性运动障碍(包括亨廷顿病,Tourette综合征,肌张力障碍,和特发性震颤)对社会认知的影响。遵循PRISMA指南并在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42022327459)中注册协议,我们分析了50项发表的研究,重点是心理理论(ToM),社会感知,和同理心。这些研究的结果提供了所有多动性运动障碍的ToM和社会感知受损的证据,特别是在识别负面情绪的过程中。此外,患有亨廷顿病和抽动症的个体表现出共情障碍。这些发现支持皮质下结构(如基底神经节和小脑)的功能作用,主要负责运动障碍,与社会认知有关的缺陷。
    Numerous lines of research indicate that our social brain involves a network of cortical and subcortical brain regions that are responsible for sensing and controlling body movements. However, it remains unclear whether movement disorders have a systematic impact on social cognition. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review examining the influence of hyperkinetic movement disorders (including Huntington disease, Tourette syndrome, dystonia, and essential tremor) on social cognition. Following the PRISMA guidelines and registering the protocol in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022327459), we analyzed 50 published studies focusing on theory of mind (ToM), social perception, and empathy. The results from these studies provide evidence of impairments in ToM and social perception in all hyperkinetic movement disorders, particularly during the recognition of negative emotions. Additionally, individuals with Huntington\'s Disease and Tourette syndrome exhibit empathy disorders. These findings support the functional role of subcortical structures (such as the basal ganglia and cerebellum), which are primarily responsible for movement disorders, in deficits related to social cognition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:以前的研究表明,听力损失患者可以内化社会污名,导致了一些自我感知的负面内涵,比如无能,认知障碍,社会残疾。这项系统评价旨在调查与听力损失相关的社会污名对成年人和老年人所经历的自我污名的影响。
    方法:为每个电子数据库选择并特别调整单词和适当的截断的组合。人口,曝光,比较器,结果,和研究特征策略被用来界定审查的范围,铭记一个精心制定的研究问题的重要性。
    结果:从每个数据库的最终搜索中总共检索到953篇文章。选择了34项研究进行全文阅读。十三被排除在外,21项研究最终纳入本综述.本综述的结果分为三个主题:(1)社会污名对自我污名的影响,(2)情绪对自我污名的影响,(3)影响自我污名的其他因素。主题与参与者报告的关于他们的听力经历的个人和社会观念之间的关系有关。
    结论:我们的结果表明,与听力损失相关的社会污名对成年人和老年人的自我污名的影响与衰老和听力损失的影响密切相关。这可能会导致撤军,社会隔离,和消极的自我认知。
    Previous studies have demonstrated that individuals with hearing loss can internalize social stigmas, resulting in several self-perceived negative connotations, such as incompetence, cognitive impairment, and social disability. This systematic review aimed to investigate the impact of the social stigma associated with hearing loss on the self-stigma experienced by adults and older adults.
    Combinations of words and appropriate truncations were selected and adjusted specifically for each electronic database. The Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcomes, and Study Characteristics strategy was used to delimit the scope of the review, bearing in mind the importance of a well-formulated research question.
    A total of 953 articles were retrieved from the final search of each database. Thirty-four studies were selected for full-text reading. Thirteen were excluded, and 21 studies were ultimately included in this review. The results of this review were divided into three themes: (1) impact of social stigmas on self-stigma, (2) effect of emotions on self-stigma, and (3) other factors that impact self-stigma. The themes were related to the relationship between the individual and social perceptions reported by the participants with respect to their hearing experiences.
    Our results suggest that the impact of social stigma associated with hearing loss on the self-stigma of adults and older adults is strongly associated with the effects of aging and hearing loss, which may lead to withdrawal, social segregation, and negative self-perception.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在精神分裂症(SCZ)中经常发生社会认知(SC)受损,然而与自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)相比,SCZ中SC的研究是稀疏的,在方法上是异构的。为了准确评估群体SC之间的差异,有必要进一步建立非社会认知(NSC)与SC之间的关系。特别是因为这在不同的疾病中可能不相同。
    本研究旨在绘制,对2014-2021年间发表的SCZ调查SC的研究质量进行索引和评估,并总结现有的局限性和对未来研究的建议。
    遵循PRISMA范围审查指南(PRISMA-ScR),确定了15项(n=15)病例对照研究,并将其纳入三个电子数据库。包括另外利用ASD样品的研究,因为它们的临床效用。
    大多数研究报告了SCZ相对于健康对照(HC)的显着SC损伤,具有不同的效应大小。在包括两个样本的大多数研究中,SCZ和ASD之间均未发现显着差异。经常发现SC和NSC之间的弱至中等相关性,尽管通常仅在患者样本中。在整个研究中,SC测试被不一致地描述为“社会认知”的测量,“精神化”和,最常见和变化的是,“心理理论”。大多数研究缺乏方法的透明度。与样本量和测试可靠性有关的限制最常被提及。
    当前在SCZ中对SC的研究受到概念和方法不确定性的限制。未来的研究应侧重于确保关键术语的清晰和有效的定义,评估和澄清SC结局指标,进一步理清SC和NSC之间的关系。
    UNASSIGNED: Impaired social cognition (SC) occurs frequently in schizophrenia (SCZ), yet compared to autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the research on SC in SCZ is sparse and methodologically heterogeneous. To accurately assess between-group SC differences it is further necessary to establish the relationship between nonsocial cognition (NSC) and SC, particularly as this may not be identical across disorders.
    UNASSIGNED: The present study aimed to map, index and assess the quality of research published between 2014-2021 investigating SC in SCZ, and to summarize existing limitations and recommendations for future research.
    UNASSIGNED: Following the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) fifteen (n = 15) case-control studies were identified and included across three electronic databases. Studies additionally utilizing ASD samples were included because of their clinical utility.
    UNASSIGNED: Most studies reported significant SC impairments in SCZ relative to healthy controls (HC) with varying effect sizes. Significant differences between SCZ and ASD were not found in most studies including both samples. Weak-to-moderate correlations between SC and NSC were often found, although often only within patient samples. Across studies, SC tests were inconsistently described as measurements of \"social cognition\", \"mentalization\" and, most frequently and varyingly, \"theory of mind\". Most studies lacked methodological transparency. Limitations related to sample sizes and test reliability were most frequently mentioned.
    UNASSIGNED: The current research on SC in SCZ is limited by conceptual and methodological uncertainties. Future research should focus on ensuring clear and valid definitions of key terms, evaluating and clarifying SC outcome measures and further untangling the relationship between SC and NSC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号