Skill

技能
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着所有专业的机器人辅助手术的增加,需要确定适当的培训和认证策略,以确保患者安全。荟萃分析评估了腹腔镜手术之间技术手术技能的可转移性,开放手术,和机器人辅助手术。
    方法:在Medline进行了系统搜索,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和WebofScience。结果被归类为时间,process,产品,和复合结果测量值,并使用Hedges\'g(标准化平均差[SMD])单独汇总。进行亚组分析以评估研究设计的效果,虚拟现实平台和任务难度。
    结果:在14,120项筛选研究中,在定性合成中包括30个,在定量合成中包括26个。已证明从腹腔镜手术到机器人辅助手术的技术手术技能转移(复合:SMD0.40,95%-置信区间[CI][0.19;0.62],时间:SMD0.62,CI[0.33;0.91]),反之亦然(复合:SMD0.66,CI[0.33;0.99],时间[基本技能]:SMD0.36,CI[0.01;0.72])。在可用数据有限的情况下,没有从开放到机器人辅助手术的技能转移。
    结论:技术手术技能可以从腹腔镜转移到机器人辅助手术,反之亦然。机器人辅助和腹腔镜手术技能培训和认证不应单独考虑,但是合理的组合可以缩短整体训练时间并提高效率。以前的开放手术经验不应被视为机器人辅助手术培训的必要条件。提出了评估技能转移的研究建议,以增加可比性和未来研究的意义。
    PROSPEROCRD42018104507。
    With an increase in robot-assisted surgery across all specialties, adequate training and credentialing strategies need to be identified to ensure patients safety. The meta-analysis assesses the transferability of technical surgical skills between laparoscopic surgery, open surgery, and robot-assisted surgery.
    A systematic search was conducted in Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Outcomes were categorized into time, process, product, and composite outcome measures and pooled separately using Hedges\'g (standardized mean difference [SMD]). Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the effect of study design, virtual reality platforms and task difficulty.
    Out of 14,120 screened studies, 30 were included in the qualitative synthesis and 26 in the quantitative synthesis. Technical surgical skill transfer was demonstrated from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery (composite: SMD 0.40, 95%-confidence interval [CI] [0.19; 0.62], time: SMD 0.62, CI [0.33; 0.91]) and vice versa (composite: SMD 0.66, CI [0.33; 0.99], time [basic skills]: SMD 0.36, CI [0.01; 0.72]). No skill transfer was seen from open to robot-assisted surgery with limited available data.
    Technical surgical skills can be transferred from laparoscopic to robot-assisted surgery and vice versa. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgical skills training and credentialing should not be regarded separately, but a reasonable combination could shorten overall training times and increase efficiency. Previous experience in open surgery should not be considered as an imperative prerequisite for training in robot-assisted surgery. Recommendations for studies assessing skill transfer are proposed to increase comparability and significance of future studies.
    PROSPERO CRD42018104507.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高尔夫是一项由复杂的运动技能组成的运动,需要以最高的精度执行。因此,运动技能学习在高尔夫中起着至关重要的作用,大量研究涉及各种运动学习方法。在本次审查中,我们对高尔夫运动技能运动学习方面的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统概述.在三个电子数据库中搜索RCT,以查看至少一种学习方法对高尔夫特定运动任务中的表现的影响。我们根据学习策略“认知训练”对研究进行分组,\"练习调度\",“增强反馈”,“内隐和外显学习”和“关注焦点”。52个RCT符合资格标准,并被纳入系统评价。在各自的策略中,优越的方法是外部关注的焦点,并增加了上下文干扰,以及无差错的学习。对于“认知训练”和“增强反馈”,没有一种方法可以被认为是最有利的。总体上最大的限制是一半以上的RCT缺乏统计能力,事实上,本综述的大多数研究只调查了简单的将任务放在新手身上。尽管我们已经显示了特定学习方法的优越性,从新手的简单高尔夫任务到高级运动员的运动特定任务的建议的可转移性仍然需要证明,并且需要研究设计,旨在为高尔夫运动中的教练和运动员提供实用的建议。
    Golf is a sport that consists of complex movement skills that need to be executed with utmost precision. Consequently, motor skill learning plays a crucial role in golf, and large numbers of studies address various methods of motor learning. In the present review, we give a systematic overview of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on motor learning of golf-specific motor skills. Three electronic databases were searched for RCTs looking at the effect of at least one learning method on performance in a golf-specific motor task. We grouped the studies depending on the learning strategies \"cognitive training\", \"practice scheduling\", \"augmented feedback\", \"implicit and explicit learning\" and \"focus of attention\". Fifty-two RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Superior methods within their respective strategies were an external focus of attention and increasing contextual interference, as well as errorless learning. For \"cognitive training\" and \"augmented feedback\", no single method can be considered the most favorable. The overall biggest limitations were the lack of statistical power for more than half of the RCTs, and the fact that most studies of the present review investigated simple putting tasks in novices only. Although we have shown superiority of specific learning methods, transferability of the recommendations that can be derived from simple golf tasks in novices to sport-specific tasks in advanced players still has to be demonstrated and require study designs with the intention to provide practical recommendations for coaches and athletes in the sport of golf.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    教练在发展运动特定技能时使用身体约束工具来补充他们的教练,然而,其有效性未知。此范围审查旨在了解在球拍中使用的物理约束工具的功效,棍子,和俱乐部运动,以发展特定的握力技能。这项范围审查遵循了乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA指南。同行评议的研究,包括准实验,真正的实验,案例研究,考虑了灰色文献。在WebofScience上搜索了同行评审的来源,Medline,和SPORTDiscus直到10月6日,2022年。排除标准是(1)不是原始的同行评审研究;(2)残疾参与者或用于康复;或(3)英语不可用。提取的数据是工具的类型,研究重点,措施,以及该工具功效的结果。关于使用物理约束工具进行特定技能开发的有效性,确定了零同行评审的来源。探索了从排除的来源中确定的共同趋势,以为使用物理约束工具进行特定技能开发的重要性提供基础。许多工具被用于教练,尽管它们的功效不清楚,然而,目前的结果可以指导未来的工作,以评估使用这些工具的急性和纵向影响,特别是在特定运动技能的发展和表现中。
    Coaches use physically constraining tools to supplement their coaching when developing sport-specific skills, however, their effectiveness is unknown. This scoping review aimed to understand the efficacy of physically constraining tools used in racket, stick, and club sports for grip-specific skill development. This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed research, including quasi-experimental, true-experimental, case studies, and grey literature were considered. Peer-reviewed sources were searched on Web of Science, Medline, and SPORTDiscus until October 6th, 2022. Exclusion criteria were (1) not original peer-reviewed research; (2) disabled participants or used for rehabilitation; or (3) not available in English. Data extracted were the type of tool, research foci, measures, and outcomes of the tool\'s efficacy. Zero peer-reviewed sources were identified on the efficacy of using physically constraining tools for grip-specific skill development. Common trends identified from the excluded sources were explored to provide a basis for the importance of using physically constraining tools for grip-specific skill development. Many tools are used in coaching despite their unclear efficacy, however, the current results can guide future work to assess the acute and longitudinal effects of using these tools, specifically within the development and performance of sport-specific skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:沟通是每个医疗保健行业的关键要素,在所有医疗保健行业中进行沟通技能培训非常重要。人工智能(AI),特别是机器学习(ML)等技术进步可能会支持这一原因:它可能为学生提供易于访问和随时可用的交流培训的机会。
    目的:本范围审查旨在总结在学术医疗保健专业中使用AI或ML获取沟通技能的现状。
    方法:我们在PubMed进行了全面的文献检索,Scopus,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience核心合集,和CINAHL数据库,以确定涵盖在追求医疗保健专业教育的本科生的沟通技能培训中使用AI或ML的文章。使用归纳法,纳入的研究分为不同的类别.研究的具体特点,AI或ML应用程序使用的方法和技术,并对研究的主要结局进行了评估。此外,概述了使用AI和ML进行医疗保健专业人员沟通技能培训的支持和阻碍因素。
    结果:确定了385项研究的标题和摘要,其中29人(7.5%)接受了全文审查。在29项研究中,根据纳入和排除标准,包括12(3.1%)。这些研究分为3个不同的类别:使用AI和ML进行文本分析和信息提取的研究,使用AI、ML和虚拟现实的研究,以及使用AI和ML以及虚拟患者模拟的研究,每个医疗专业人员的沟通技巧的学术培训。在这些主题领域中,人工智能也用于提供反馈。参与人员的动机在实施过程中起着重要作用。据报道,在沟通技能培训中使用AI和ML的障碍围绕着基于AI和ML的虚拟患者系统缺乏真实性和有限的语言自然流动。此外,目前,在医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训中使用基于教育AI和ML的系统仅限于少数情况,主题,和临床领域。
    结论:在医疗保健专业人员的沟通技能培训中使用AI和ML显然是一个不断发展和有前途的领域,有可能使培训更具成本效益和更少的时间。此外,它可以作为一种个性化和容易获得的锻炼方法。然而,在大多数情况下,概述的应用程序和技术解决方案在访问方面受到限制,可能的场景,谈话的自然流动,和真实性。这些问题仍然阻碍任何广泛的实施雄心。
    Communication is a crucial element of every health care profession, rendering communication skills training in all health care professions as being of great importance. Technological advances such as artificial intelligence (AI) and particularly machine learning (ML) may support this cause: it may provide students with an opportunity for easily accessible and readily available communication training.
    This scoping review aimed to summarize the status quo regarding the use of AI or ML in the acquisition of communication skills in academic health care professions.
    We conducted a comprehensive literature search across the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, and CINAHL databases to identify articles that covered the use of AI or ML in communication skills training of undergraduate students pursuing health care profession education. Using an inductive approach, the included studies were organized into distinct categories. The specific characteristics of the studies, methods and techniques used by AI or ML applications, and main outcomes of the studies were evaluated. Furthermore, supporting and hindering factors in the use of AI and ML for communication skills training of health care professionals were outlined.
    The titles and abstracts of 385 studies were identified, of which 29 (7.5%) underwent full-text review. Of the 29 studies, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 (3.1%) were included. The studies were organized into 3 distinct categories: studies using AI and ML for text analysis and information extraction, studies using AI and ML and virtual reality, and studies using AI and ML and the simulation of virtual patients, each within the academic training of the communication skills of health care professionals. Within these thematic domains, AI was also used for the provision of feedback. The motivation of the involved agents played a major role in the implementation process. Reported barriers to the use of AI and ML in communication skills training revolved around the lack of authenticity and limited natural flow of language exhibited by the AI- and ML-based virtual patient systems. Furthermore, the use of educational AI- and ML-based systems in communication skills training for health care professionals is currently limited to only a few cases, topics, and clinical domains.
    The use of AI and ML in communication skills training for health care professionals is clearly a growing and promising field with a potential to render training more cost-effective and less time-consuming. Furthermore, it may serve learners as an individualized and readily available exercise method. However, in most cases, the outlined applications and technical solutions are limited in terms of access, possible scenarios, the natural flow of a conversation, and authenticity. These issues still stand in the way of any widespread implementation ambitions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于模拟的学习(SBL)是一种强制性教学方法,适用于涉及广泛变化的临床内容的情况,而不会使患者暴露于受训者学习固有的风险。本综述的目的是评估SBL在学习领域的结果,即认知,情感,和精神运动。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,临床试验数据库,和其他来源,以评估SBL与传统教学方法在护理学生中的有效性,直到2021年3月。两位作者分别提取了数据,确定了偏差风险并对数据进行了分析。
    纳入总共364名护生的选定研究进行分析。总的来说,发现通过模拟学习具有有益的效果。在组合亚组分析中,模拟的使用对学生的理解有显著影响(SMD=1.31,95%CI[0.80,1.82],P<0.00001),自信(SMD=1.93,95%CI[1.01,2.84],P<0.0001),(SMD=1.83,95%CI[0.91,2.74],P<0.0001),学习满意度[E:17.94,C-17.60]和技能(SMD=1.62,95%CI[0.62,2.62],P=0.002)和心理护理(SMD=1.60,95CI[0.61,2.58],P=0.001)。在分析过程中发现了I2=54%-86%的异质性。
    本研究的发现认为模拟是一种有效的教学方法,可以增强认知能力,情感,和精神运动技能。
    UNASSIGNED: Simulation-based learning (SBL) emerged as an imperative pedagogical approach adaptable to situations involving widely varying clinical content without exposing patients to the risks inherent in trainee learning. The purpose of the present review was to assess the outcome of SBL on the domains of learning i.e cognitive, affective, and psychomotor.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Clinical Trial database, and other sources to evaluate the effectiveness of SBL versus traditional teaching methods among nursing students till March 2021. Two authors individually extracted the data and identified the risk of bias and analyzed the data.
    UNASSIGNED: The selected studies with a total of 364 nursing students were included for analysis. Overall, it was found that learning via simulation has beneficial effects. In combined subgroup analysis, use of simulation showed significant effects on students\' understanding (SMD = 1.31, 95% CI [0.80, 1.82], P < 0.00001), Self-confidence (SMD = 1.93, 95% CI [1.01,2.84], P < 0.0001), (SMD = 1.83, 95% CI [0.91,2.74], P < 0.0001), Learning satisfaction [E:17.94, C-17.60] and Skill (SMD = 1.62, 95% CI [0.62,2.62], P = 0.002) and psychological care (SMD = 1.60, 95%CI [0.61,2.58], P = 0.001). Heterogeneity ranging from I2 = 54%-86% was found during the analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The findings of the present study considered simulation as an effective teaching method to enhance cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:接受现场护理超声(POCUS)培训的医生数量越来越多,因此需要对当前培训方法进行严格的评估和改进。执行POCUS是一项复杂的任务,并且未知哪种(神经)认知机制在该技能的能力发展中最重要。进行此系统评价是为了确定可用于优化POCUS培训的POCUS能力发展的决定因素。
    方法:PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Emcare,搜索PsycINFO和ERIC数据库以进行测量超声(US)技能和能力的研究。论文分为三类:“相关知识”,“精神运动能力”和“视觉空间能力”。“相关知识”类别在“图像解释”中进一步细分,“技术方面”和“一般认知能力”。基于智能v2.2的Cattell-Horn-Carroll(CHC)模型,将视觉空间能力细分为视觉空间子类别,其中包括视觉空间操纵和视觉空间感知。事后,进行了荟萃分析以计算合并相关性.
    结果:选择了26篇论文纳入综述。15人报告了相关知识,汇总确定系数为0.26。四篇论文报道了精神运动能力,其中一人报告说与POCUS能力有显著关系。13篇论文报道了视觉空间能力,合并的决定系数为0.16.
    结论:评估POCUS能力和POCUS能力获得的可能决定因素的方法存在很多异质性。这使得很难就哪些决定因素应成为改善POCUS教育的框架的一部分得出强有力的结论。然而,我们确定了POCUS能力发展的两个决定因素:相关知识和视觉空间能力。无法更深入地检索相关知识的内容。对于视觉空间能力,我们使用CHC模型作为理论框架来分析这项技能。我们不能指出精神运动能力是POCUS能力的决定因素。
    BACKGROUND: The increasing number of physicians that are trained in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) warrants critical evaluation and improvement of current training methods. Performing POCUS is a complex task and it is unknown which (neuro)cognitive mechanisms are most important in competence development of this skill. This systematic review was conducted to identify determinants of POCUS competence development that can be used to optimize POCUS training.
    METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, PsycINFO and ERIC databases were searched for studies measuring ultrasound (US) skills and aptitude. The papers were divided into three categories: \"Relevant knowledge\", \"Psychomotor ability\" and \'Visuospatial ability\'. The \'Relevant knowledge\' category was further subdivided in \'image interpretation\', \'technical aspects\' and \'general cognitive abilities\'. Visuospatial ability was subdivided in visuospatial subcategories based on the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Model of Intelligence v2.2, which includes visuospatial manipulation and visuospatial perception. Post-hoc, a meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled correlations.
    RESULTS: 26 papers were selected for inclusion in the review. 15 reported on relevant knowledge with a pooled coefficient of determination of 0.26. Four papers reported on psychomotor abilities, one reported a significant relationship with POCUS competence. 13 papers reported on visuospatial abilities, the pooled coefficient of determination was 0.16.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was a lot of heterogeneity in methods to assess possible determinants of POCUS competence and POCUS competence acquisition. This makes it difficult to draw strong conclusions on which determinants should be part of a framework to improve POCUS education. However, we identified two determinants of POCUS competence development: relevant knowledge and visuospatial ability. The content of relevant knowledge could not be retrieved in more depth. For visuospatial ability we used the CHC model as theoretical framework to analyze this skill. We could not point out psychomotor ability as a determinant of POCUS competence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在对有关核心训练对足球运动员与技能相关的体能表现的影响的现有文献进行深入回顾。以及为研究人员和教练提供建议。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究的数据是根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目提供的。使用科学数据库和网络搜索引擎,包括Scopus,Ebscohost,WebofScience,PubMed,和谷歌学者,研究人员从已发表的文献中收集研究。84篇文章中只有26篇满足所有纳入标准,因此被纳入系统审查。使用PEDro量表确定每个研究的质量。26项研究的分数在3到6之间。
    未经评估:核心训练可以提高足球运动员与技能相关的身体素质,包括他们的力量,速度,balance,和敏捷性。
    UNASSIGNED:核心是身体的解剖和功能中心以及其“引擎”。“所有运动都是从身体的中心发出的,并传递到四肢。核心肌肉与四肢肌肉不同,因为它们经常收缩,从而使躯干变得艰难,所有的肌肉一起工作,成为增效剂。理论上,坚固的核心允许从下半身到上半身的力传递,而躯干的能量损失最小。根据26项研究,这项审查建议,核心训练应纳入足球运动员的日常训练中,每次训练的最小频率和长度为15分钟,每周两次,4周。
    UNASSIGNED:https://inplasy.com,标识符INPLASY202290045。
    This study aims to present an in-depth review of the available literature on the effect of core training on skill-related physical fitness performance among soccer players, as well as to offer suggestions for researchers and coaches.
    The data in this study were presented based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Using scientific databases and web search engines including Scopus, Ebscohost, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, researchers collected studies from the published literature. Only 26 of the 84 articles satisfied all the inclusion criteria and were thus included in the systematic review. The quality of each study was determined using the PEDro scale. The scores for 26 studies range between three and six.
    Core training can improve soccer players\' skill-related physical fitness, including their power, speed, balance, and agility.
    The core is the anatomic and functional center of the body as well as its \"engine.\" All movements emanate from the center of the body and are transmitted to the extremities. The core muscles differ from the limb muscles because they frequently cocontract, thus making the torso hard to the point whereby all the muscles work together to become synergists. Theoretically, a strong core permits the passage of force from the lower body to the upper body with minimal energy loss in the torso. Based on the 26 studies, this review suggests that core training should be incorporated into the daily training sessions of soccer players, with a minimum frequency and length of 15 min per training session, twice per week, for 4 weeks.
    https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202290045.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是研究攀岩和攀岩阻力训练对攀岩表现的影响。以及力量和耐力测试。我们系统地搜索了三个数据库(SPORTDiscus,Scopus,和PubMed)发布到2021年1月的记录。搜索仅限于使用活动攀岩者并测量攀岩性能或攀岩特定测试中的性能的随机对照试验。来自荟萃分析的数据呈现为具有95%置信区间(95%CI)的标准化平均值差异(SDM)。系统评价中包括11项研究,5项研究将训练与对照组进行比较,可以进行荟萃分析。总体荟萃分析显示,与仅攀岩相比,攀岩特定阻力训练后的攀岩相关测试性能有所改善(SDM=0.57,95CI=0.24-0.91)。进一步的分析表明,手指力量(SDM=0.41,95CI0.03-0.80),力发展率(SDM=0.91,95CI=0.21-1.61),与攀岩训练相比,前臂耐力(SDM=1.23,95CI=0.69-1.77)通过手指屈肌的阻力训练得到改善。系统评价表明,可以通过特定的阻力训练或间歇式抱石来改善攀爬性能。然而,在特定的攀爬测试中,手指屈肌的阻力训练在力量或耐力方面没有改善。现有证据表明,阻力训练可能比仅仅攀岩训练更有效,以提高成绩。重要的是,包括登山者在内的介入研究是有限的,需要更多的研究来证实这些发现。
    The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effects of climbing and climbing-and-resistance-training on climbing performance, and strength and endurance tests. We systematically searched three databases (SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for records published until January 2021. The search was limited to randomized-controlled trials using active climbers and measuring climbing performance or performance in climbing-specific tests. Data from the meta-analysis are presented as standardized difference in mean (SDM) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Eleven studies are included in the systematic review and five studies compared training to a control group and could be meta-analyzed. The overall meta-analysis displayed an improvement in climbing-related test performance following climbing-specific resistance training compared to only climbing (SDM = 0.57, 95%CI = 0.24-0.91). Further analyses revealed that finger strength (SDM = 0.41, 95%CI 0.03-0.80), rate of force development (SDM = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.21-1.61), and forearm endurance (SDM = 1.23, 95%CI = 0.69-1.77) were improved by resistance-training of the finger flexors compared to climbing training. The systematic review showed that climbing performance may be improved by specific resistance-training or interval-style bouldering. However, resistance-training of the finger flexors showed no improvements in strength or endurance in climbing-specific tests. The available evidence suggests that resistance-training may be more effective than just climbing-training for improving performance outcomes. Importantly, interventional studies including climbers is limited and more research is needed to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在护士中促进循证实践(EBP)可能是改善医疗保健的重要组成部分。然而,迄今为止,尚未对与护士知识和技能EBP相关的因素进行综合分析.这对于促进获取相关知识和技能以有效实施EBP至关重要。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定与护士EBP知识和技能相关的因素。
    方法:我们搜索了截至2021年10月25日的各种文献数据库,以进行相关研究,调查与护士EBP知识和技能相关的因素。作者,一年的学习,国家,研究设计,研究主题信息,用于评估EBP知识和技能的仪器,使用多变量分析,从每项符合条件的研究中提取与护士EBP知识和技能显著相关的因素,并对其进行整理,以确定常见的报告因素.
    结果:我们确定了在多个国家进行的47项符合条件的研究。九篇文章应用了多变量分析,38篇文献未进行任何多变量分析.将与护士EBP知识和技能水平相关的因素分为两类:个人和工作环境因素。在进行多变量分析的九篇文章中,个人因素,其中包括教育水平,参与EBP教育,和进行研究的经验,和工作环境因素,例如对EBP的资源和组织支持,与护士的EBP知识和技能有关。
    结论:我们的评论强调了教育水平,参与EBP教育,进行研究的经验,EBP的资源和组织支持是与全球护士EBP知识和技能相关的重要因素。关注这些因素可能有助于提高护士对EBP的认识并促进EBP的实施。
    BACKGROUND: Promoting evidence-based practice (EBP) among nurses may be a valuable component of improving health care. However, a comprehensive analysis of the factors associated with the knowledge and skill EBP in nurses has not been performed to date. This is essential for facilitating the acquisition of relevant knowledge and skills to effectively implement EBP.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the factors related to the knowledge and skills of EBP among nurses.
    METHODS: We searched various literature databases up to October 25, 2021, for relevant studies that investigated the factors associated with the knowledge and skills of EBP in nurses. The authors, year of study, country, study design, study subject information, instruments used for the assessment EBP knowledge and skills, use of multivariable analysis, and factors significantly associated with the knowledge and skills of EBP among nurses were extracted from each eligible study and collated to identify commonly reported factors.
    RESULTS: We identified 47 eligible studies conducted in a wide range of countries. Nine articles applied multivariable analyses, and 38 articles did not perform any multivariable analyses. The factors related to the knowledge and skill levels of EBP among nurses were classified into two categories: personal and work-environment factors. In the nine articles that conducted multivariable analysis, personal factors, which included educational level, participation in EBP education, and experience conducting research, and work-environment factors, such as resources and organizational support for EBP, were related to the knowledge and skills of EBP among nurses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our review highlighted educational level, participation in EBP education, experience conducting research, and resources and organizational support for EBP as important factors that are associated with the knowledge and skills of EBP in nurses worldwide. Focusing on these factors may help improve nurses\' understanding of EBP and facilitate the implementation of EBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:高度测量训练(PT)已在运动人群中进行了广泛的研究。然而,PT对网球运动员的影响不太清楚。方法:我们旨在巩固现有的关于PT对健康网球运动员技能和身体表现的影响的研究。2022年5月30日,对SCOPUS进行全面搜索,PubMed,WebofScience,和SPORTDiscus(通过EBSCOhost)数据库进行。采用PICOS来定义入选标准:1)健康的网球运动员;2)PT计划;3)将补全度干预与对照组或其他运动组进行比较,和单组试验;4)测试了至少一项网球技巧或身体表现的指标;5)非随机研究试验和随机对照设计。通过使用CochraneRoB-2和ROBINS-I仪器评估个别研究的方法学质量。使用建议评估的分级,发展,和评估(等级),评估了每个结果的证据的确定性,采用综合Meta分析软件进行Meta分析。结果:12项研究包括443名年龄在12.5-25岁之间的网球运动员。PT持续3至9周。八项研究提供了数据,以便在荟萃分析中汇集结果。PT程序对最大发球速度检测到中等正效应(ES=0.75;p<0.0001)。就物理性能而言,小到中等(ES=0.43-0.88;p=0.046至<0.001)的影响,注意到冲刺速度,下肢肌肉力量,和敏捷性。而对下肢肌肉力量没有显著和小的影响(ES=0.30;p=0.115)。我们没有发现明确的证据表明PT改变了其他参数(即,服务准确性,上肢力量和力量,反应时间,和有氧耐力)。基于等级,纳入研究的证据确定性从非常低到中等不等.结论:PT可以改善最大发球速度和物理性能成分(冲刺速度,下肢肌肉力量,和敏捷性)对于健康的网球运动员;但是,关于PT对网球运动员技术和身体表现的影响的更多高质量证据值得进一步研究。系统审查注册:[https://inplasy.com/],标识符[INPLASY202250146]。
    Background: Plyometric training (PT) has been researched extensively in athletic populations. However, the effects of PT on tennis players are less clear. Methods: We aim to consolidate the existing research on the effects of PT on healthy tennis players\' skill and physical performance. On 30th May 2022, a comprehensive search of SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, and SPORTDiscus (via EBSCOhost) databases was performed. PICOS was employed to define the inclusion criteria: 1) healthy tennis players; 2) a PT program; 3) compared a plyometric intervention to a control group or another exercise group, and single-group trials; 4) tested at least one measures of tennis skill or physical performance; and 5) non-randomized study trials and randomized control designs. Individual studies\' methodological quality was evaluated by using the Cochrane RoB-2 and ROBINS-I instruments. Using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), the certainty of the body of evidence for each outcome was assessed, and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software was employed for the meta-analysis. Results: Twelve studies comprising 443 tennis players aged 12.5-25 years were eligible for inclusion. The PT lasted from 3 to 9 weeks. Eight studies provided data to allow for the pooling of results in a meta-analysis. A moderate positive effect was detected for PT programs on maximal serve velocity (ES = 0.75; p < 0.0001). In terms of measures of physical performance, small to moderate (ES = 0.43-0.88; p = 0.046 to < 0.001) effects were noted for sprint speed, lower extremity muscle power, and agility. While no significant and small effect was noted for lower extremity muscle strength (ES = 0.30; p = 0.115). We found no definitive evidence that PT changed other parameters (i.e., serve accuracy, upper extremity power and strength, reaction time, and aerobic endurance). Based on GRADE, the certainty of evidence across the included studies varied from very low to moderate. Conclusion: PT may improve maximal serve velocity and physical performance components (sprint speed, lower extremity muscular power, and agility) for healthy tennis players; however, more high-quality evidence about the effects of PT on the skill and physical performance of tennis players merits further investigation. Systematic Review Registration: [https://inplasy.com/], identifier [INPLASY202250146].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号