Abstract：
Coaches use physically constraining tools to supplement their coaching when developing sport-specific skills, however, their effectiveness is unknown. This scoping review aimed to understand the efficacy of physically constraining tools used in racket, stick, and club sports for grip-specific skill development. This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed research, including quasi-experimental, true-experimental, case studies, and grey literature were considered. Peer-reviewed sources were searched on Web of Science, Medline, and SPORTDiscus until October 6th, 2022. Exclusion criteria were (1) not original peer-reviewed research; (2) disabled participants or used for rehabilitation; or (3) not available in English. Data extracted were the type of tool, research foci, measures, and outcomes of the tool\'s efficacy. Zero peer-reviewed sources were identified on the efficacy of using physically constraining tools for grip-specific skill development. Common trends identified from the excluded sources were explored to provide a basis for the importance of using physically constraining tools for grip-specific skill development. Many tools are used in coaching despite their unclear efficacy, however, the current results can guide future work to assess the acute and longitudinal effects of using these tools, specifically within the development and performance of sport-specific skills.
摘要：
教练在发展运动特定技能时使用身体约束工具来补充他们的教练，然而,其有效性未知。此范围审查旨在了解在球拍中使用的物理约束工具的功效，棍子,和俱乐部运动，以发展特定的握力技能。这项范围审查遵循了乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法和PRISMA指南。同行评议的研究，包括准实验，真正的实验，案例研究,考虑了灰色文献。在WebofScience上搜索了同行评审的来源，Medline,和SPORTDiscus直到10月6日，2022年。排除标准是（1）不是原始的同行评审研究；（2）残疾参与者或用于康复；或（3）英语不可用。提取的数据是工具的类型，研究重点,措施，以及该工具功效的结果。关于使用物理约束工具进行特定技能开发的有效性，确定了零同行评审的来源。探索了从排除的来源中确定的共同趋势，以为使用物理约束工具进行特定技能开发的重要性提供基础。许多工具被用于教练，尽管它们的功效不清楚，然而,目前的结果可以指导未来的工作，以评估使用这些工具的急性和纵向影响，特别是在特定运动技能的发展和表现中。
