sofa score

SOFA 评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在研究我们中心的慢加急性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者的病因和临床特征,并描述与死亡率相关的因素。
    方法:纳入符合亚太肝脏研究协会(APASL)ACLF定义的患者。我们研究了ACLF患者的病因和临床特征,并分析了与死亡率相关的因素。我们还根据器官衰竭的数量和ACLF的等级分析了死亡率。
    结果:114例患者被纳入。酒精(82,71.9%),药物(22,19.3%),病毒性肝炎(17,14.9%)是ACLF最常见的诱发因素。慢性疾病的最常见原因是酒精(83,72.8%)。53人(46.5%),60(52.6%),44(38.6%),32(28.1%),和24(21.1%)经历肾脏,凝血,大脑,呼吸,和循环故障,分别。总的来说,住院死亡率为54例(48.6%),平均停留8天.晚期肝性脑病和呼吸机支持独立预测死亡率。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在预测ACLF死亡率方面优于所有其他预后评分。
    结论:酒精是ACLF最常见的沉淀因子。住院死亡率为48.6%。晚期肝性脑病和呼吸机支持独立预测死亡率。与其他预后评分相比,SOFA评分是ACLF死亡率更准确的预测指标。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study the etiologies and clinical profile and to describe the factors associated with mortality in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients at our center.
    METHODS: Patients meeting the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) definition of ACLF were included. We studied etiologies and clinical profile and analyzed the factors associated with mortality in patients with ACLF. We also analyzed the mortality rates based on the number of organ failures and the grade of ACLF.
    RESULTS: 114 patients were included. Alcohol (82, 71.9%), drugs (22, 19.3%), and viral hepatitis (17, 14.9%) were the commonest precipitating factors of ACLF. The commonest cause of chronic disease was alcohol (83, 72.8%). Fifty-three (46.5%), 60 (52.6%), 44 (38.6%), 32 (28.1%), and 24 (21.1%) experienced renal, coagulation, cerebral, respiratory, and circulation failures, respectively. Overall, the in-hospital mortality rate stood at 54 (48.6%), with a median stay of eight days. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score outperformed all other prognostic scores in predicting mortality in ACLF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol was the most common precipitating factor for ACLF. The in-hospital mortality rate was 48.6%. Advanced hepatic encephalopathy and ventilator support independently predicted mortality. The SOFA score is a more accurate predictor of mortality in ACLF when compared to other prognostic scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒症是影响全球数百万人的主要全球健康,因此,了解其影响因素变得至关重要。这项在三级护理中心进行的横断面研究探讨了铁轮廓之间的关系,维生素D水平,以及脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的预后。主要目的是探讨早期重症监护病房(ICU)住院期间铁和维生素D参数的患病率及其与28天死亡率的关系。
    跨越18个月,本研究纳入ICU符合脓毒症或脓毒性休克标准的成年患者.数据收集包括人口统计信息,临床特征,入院时的铁和维生素D水平的血液样本。使用序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和急性生理学和慢性健康评估II(APACHEII)评分评估疾病严重程度,按照存活的脓毒症-3指南进行治疗。
    这项研究涉及142名参与者,发现流行的生物体,如鲍曼不动杆菌,铜绿假单胞菌,和肺炎克雷伯菌.确定了与死亡率的值得注意的联系,包括血管加压药支持,ICU住院时间,SOFA得分,和APACHE-II得分。有趣的是,年龄,性别,和维生素D水平没有显着关联。然而,这项研究确实揭示了铁之间的显著关联,铁蛋白,和转铁蛋白饱和度水平增加28天死亡率。
    我们的研究得出结论,低铁,铁蛋白升高,转铁蛋白饱和度降低与感兴趣的结果保持相关性。虽然与维生素D水平没有建立这种关系。这些结果表明对患者管理和预后的潜在影响,值得在未来的研究中进一步探索。
    BairwaM,JatteppanavarB,康德R,辛格M,ChoudhuryA.铁谱和维生素D水平对脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者临床结局的影响:三级护理中心的横断面分析。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(6):569-574。
    UNASSIGNED: Sepsis is a major global health affecting millions worldwide, hence understanding its contributing factors becomes paramount. This cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center explores the relationship between iron profile, vitamin D levels, and outcomes in sepsis and septic shock patients. The primary objective was to explore the prevalence of iron profile and vitamin D parameters during early intensive care unit (ICU) admission and their association with 28-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Spanning 18 months, the study enrolled adult patients meeting sepsis or septic shock criteria at the ICU. Data collection included demographic information, clinical characteristics, and blood samples for iron profile and vitamin D levels at admission. Disease severity was assessed using sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, and treatment was administered as per surviving sepsis-3 guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: The research involved 142 participants, uncovering prevalent organisms such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Noteworthy connections to mortality were identified for factors including vasopressor support, ICU stay duration, SOFA score, and APACHE-II score. Interestingly, age, gender, and vitamin D levels showed no significant associations. However, the study did reveal a significant association between iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels with increased 28-day mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study concluded that low Iron, elevated ferritin, and decreased transferrin saturation levels maintained associations with the outcome of interest. While no such relationship was established with vitamin D levels. These results suggest potential implications for patient management and prognosis, warranting further exploration in future research.
    UNASSIGNED: Bairwa M, Jatteppanavar B, Kant R, Singh M, Choudhury A. Impact of Iron Profile and Vitamin D Levels on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Cross-sectional Analysis at a Tertiary Care Center. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):569-574.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    如何引用这篇文章:PatnaikRK,KaranN.协同生存:在重症监护预后中联合急性胃肠道损伤等级和疾病严重程度评分。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(6):529-530。
    How to cite this article: Patnaik RK, Karan N. Synergizing Survival: Uniting Acute Gastrointestinal Injury Grade and Disease Severity Scores in Critical Care Prognostication. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):529-530.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究β-内酰胺治疗药物监测(TDM)在危重患者中的益处的临床研究受到小患者群体的阻碍,研究之间的差异,患者异质性,以及TDM的使用不足。因此,关于TDM疗效的确切结论仍然难以捉摸。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了一种创新的方法,利用数据驱动的方法来揭示治疗有效性和患者数据之间的隐藏联系,通过一项随机对照试验(DRKS00011159;2016年10月10日)收集。我们的发现表明,机器学习算法可以成功地识别出区分健康和生病状态的信息特征。这些有望成为疾病分类和严重程度分层的潜在标志,以及提供连续和数据驱动的“多维”序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。通过机器学习揭示治疗有效性和临床相关数据之间的复杂联系,证明了TDM对患者恢复率的积极影响。
    Clinical studies investigating the benefits of beta-lactam therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) among critically ill patients are hindered by small patient groups, variability between studies, patient heterogeneity, and inadequate use of TDM. Accordingly, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of TDM remain elusive. To address these challenges, we propose an innovative approach that leverages data-driven methods to unveil the concealed connections between therapy effectiveness and patient data, collected through a randomized controlled trial (DRKS00011159; 10th October 2016). Our findings reveal that machine learning algorithms can successfully identify informative features that distinguish between healthy and sick states. These hold promise as potential markers for disease classification and severity stratification, as well as offering a continuous and data-driven \"multidimensional\" Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The positive impact of TDM on patient recovery rates is demonstrated by unraveling the intricate connections between therapy effectiveness and clinically relevant data via machine learning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于TS的高死亡率,有效指导其诊断和治疗至关重要。JTA在2012年引入的诊断标准,以及Burch-WartofskyPointScale,构成TS诊断的有价值的工具。2016年,JTA和JES制定了TS管理指南。最近,一项基于多中心登记的前瞻性研究将110例新发TS患者的预后和结局与之前的可比研究结果进行了比较,并评估了指南的疗效.研究表明,较高的APACHEII评分与较低的BMI之间存在显着相关性,复苏后休克,和发烧的结果,总的来说,改善TS预后。研究中的大多数患者接受了甲氧咪唑和碘化钾,及时的管理与较低的死亡率有关。坚持治疗指南与较低的死亡率相关,强调ICU环境中经验丰富的多学科团队的重要性,以及定期审查指南以加强治疗方法和降低死亡率的必要性。
    Due to the high mortality rate of TS, effective guidance for its diagnosis and treatment is essential. The diagnostic criteria introduced by the JTA in 2012, along with the Burch-Wartofsky Point Scale, constitute valuable tools for the diagnosis of TS. In 2016, Guidelines on the management of TS were produced by the JTA and the JES. Recently, a prospective multicenter register-based study compared the prognosis and outcome of 110 new-onset TS patients with the results of previous comparable studies and evaluated the efficacy of the Guidelines. The study revealed higher APACHE II scores and significant correlations between lower BMI, post-resuscitation shock, and fever with outcomes and, overall, improved TS prognosis. Most patients in the study received methimazole and potassium iodide, the timely administration of which was linked to lower fatality rates. Adherence to treatment guidelines correlates with lower mortality rates, emphasizing the importance of experienced multidisciplinary teams in ICU settings and the necessity for periodic review of the guidelines to enhance therapeutic approaches and reduce mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的研究表明促红细胞生成素对中枢神经系统具有抗炎作用。作者旨在研究促红细胞生成素对格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)的影响。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,以及创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的死亡率。
    68例符合纳入标准的患者被随机分配到对照组或干预组。在干预组中,在第1、3和5天施用促红细胞生成素(4000单位)。在对照组中,同日使用生理盐水。主要结果是干预期间GCS和SOFA评分的变化。次要结果是前2周的通气期和3个月的死亡率。
    促红细胞生成素给药随着时间的推移显著影响SOFA评分(P=0.008),但对GCS没有显著影响,观察两组患者的通气时间。最后,促红细胞生成素对三个月死亡率没有显著影响(23.5%vs.促红细胞生成素和对照组为38.2%,分别)。然而,干预组的死亡率低于对照组。
    我们的发现表明,在TBI中使用促红细胞生成素可以改善SOFA评分。因此,促红细胞生成素可能对TBI患者的早期发病和临床改善有有益作用。
    UNASSIGNED: Recent studies suggest that erythropoietin has an anti-inflammatory effect on the central nervous system. The authors aimed to investigate the effect of erythropoietin on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, and the mortality rate of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty-eight patients with available inclusion criteria were randomly allocated to the control or intervention groups. In the intervention group, erythropoietin (4000 units) was administrated on days 1, 3, and 5. In the control group, normal saline on the same days was used. The primary outcomes were the GCS and SOFA score changes during the intervention. The secondary outcomes were the ventilation period during the first 2 weeks and the 3-month mortality rate.
    UNASSIGNED: Erythropoietin administration significantly affected SOFA score over time (P=0.008), but no significant effect on the GCS, and duration of ventilation between the two groups was observed. Finally, erythropoietin had no significant effect on the three-month mortality (23.5% vs. 38.2% in the erythropoietin and control group, respectively). However, the mortality rate in the intervention group was lower than in the control group.
    UNASSIGNED: Our finding showed that erythropoietin administration in TBI may improve SOFA score. Therefore, erythropoietin may have beneficial effects on early morbidity and clinical improvement in TBI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)是支持心脏手术后心源性休克患者的一种挽救生命的方法。这项工作旨在分析血液乳酸水平变化对心脏手术后ECMO(PC-ECMO)患者生存的影响,以及乳酸清除率(LC)是否优于绝对乳酸水平。
    结果:我们回顾性分析了2016年至2022年在我们中心接受PC-ECMO治疗的成年患者的数据。主要结果是住院死亡率。在ECMO开始时测量动脉血乳酸水平,峰值以及VA-ECMO支持后12和24小时。在12和24小时计算LC。在2368例接受心脏手术的患者中,152(平均年龄,48岁;其中57.9%是男性)接受PC-ECMO。其中,48人(31.6%)存活出院,104人(68.4%)在住院期间死亡。非幸存者的房颤发生率较高(41.35%vs.12.5%,P<0.001),慢性肾脏病(26.9%vs.6.3%,P=0.004),延长体外循环(237vs.192分钟,P=0.016)和主动脉交叉钳夹时间(160vs.124分钟,P=0.04)比幸存者。非幸存者在开始ECMO时序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分中位数明显较高(13.5vs.9,P<0.001)和静脉动脉ECMO(SAVE)评分后中位生存率较低(-3vs.3,P<0.001),SAVE等级高于幸存者(P<0.001)。经过12小时的VA-ECMO支持,存活者(r=-0.755,P<0.001)和非存活者(r=-0.601,P<0.001)血乳酸水平与LC呈负相关。24小时后,存活者(r=-0.764,P<0.001)和非存活者(r=-0.847,P<0.001)之间存在相同的负相关。在12小时测量血乳酸水平以确定医院死亡率[>8.2mmol/L,接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC):0.868]和24h(>2.6mmol/L,AUROC:0.896)具有最佳性能,其次是LC-T12(<21.94%,AUROC:0.807),LC-T24(<40.3%,AUROC:0.839)和峰值血乳酸(>14.35mmol/L,AUROC:0.828)。最初的前ECMO血乳酸(>6.25mmol/L,AUROC:0.731)具有可接受的区分死亡率的能力,但低于以下测量值和清除率。Kaplan-Meier曲线表明,T12h时LC<21.94%,T24h时<40.3%与生存率降低相关(log-rankP<0.001)。死亡率的Cox比例风险回归分析显示,T12h时<21.94%的LC调整后的风险比(HR)为2.73[95%置信区间(CI):1.64-5.762,P<0.001],T24h时<40.3%的LC调整后的HR为1.98(95%CI:1.46-4.173,P<0.001)。PC-ECMO后住院死亡率的预测因素是12h时的乳酸水平[比值比(OR):1.67,95%CI:1.121-2.181,P=0.001]。初始SOFA评分(OR:1.593,95%CI:1.15-2.73,P<0.001),初始血乳酸(OR:1.21,95%CI:1.016-1.721,P=0.032)和心房颤动(OR:6.17,95%CI:2.37-57.214,P=0.003)。在相同点使用乳酸水平和清除率的双变量模型显示,血液乳酸水平优于清除率。
    结论:连续测量动脉血乳酸和LC有助于获得心脏手术后VA-ECMO支持的成年患者的早期预后指导。绝对乳酸水平,与LC在同一时间点相比,在区分死亡率方面表现更好。
    OBJECTIVE: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a life-saving procedure for supporting patients with cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery. This work aimed to analyse the impact of changes in blood lactate levels on the survival of patients on post-cardiotomy ECMO (PC-ECMO) and whether lactate clearance (LC) performs better than absolute lactate levels.
    RESULTS: We retrospectively analysed the data of adult patients who received PC-ECMO at our centre between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. Arterial lactate levels were measured at ECMO initiation, peak and 12 and 24 h after VA-ECMO support. LC was calculated at 12 and 24 h. Out of 2368 patients who received cardiac surgeries, 152 (median age, 48 years; 57.9% of them were men) received PC-ECMO. Of them, 48 (31.6%) survived and were discharged, while 104 (68.4%) died during the index hospitalization. Non-survivors had higher frequencies of atrial fibrillation (41.35% vs. 12.5%, P < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (26.9% vs. 6.3%, P = 0.004), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass (237 vs. 192 min, P = 0.016) and aortic cross-clamping times (160 vs. 124 min, P = 0.04) than survivors. Non-survivors had a significantly higher median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at ECMO initiation (13.5 vs. 9, P < 0.001) and a lower median Survival After Veno-arterial ECMO (SAVE) score (-3 vs. 3, P < 0.001) with higher SAVE classes (P < 0.001) than survivors. After 12 h of VA-ECMO support, the blood lactate level was negatively correlated with LC in survivors (r = -0.755, P < 0.001) and non-survivors (r = -0.601, P < 0.001). After 24 h, the same negative correlation was identified between survivors (r = -0.764, P < 0.001) and non-survivors (r = -0.847, P < 0.001). Blood lactate levels measured at 12 h to determine hospital mortality [>8.2 mmol/L, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC): 0.868] and 24 h (>2.6 mmol/L, AUROC: 0.896) had the best performance, followed by LC-T12 (<21.94%, AUROC: 0.807), LC-T24 (<40.3%, AUROC: 0.839) and peak blood lactate (>14.35 mmol/L, AUROC: 0.828). The initial pre-ECMO blood lactate (>6.25 mmol/L, AUROC: 0.731) had an acceptable ability to discriminate mortality but was less than the following measurements and clearance. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that LC of <21.94% at T12 h and <40.3% at T24 h was associated with decreased survival (log-rank P < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis for mortality revealed that LC of <21.94% at T12 h had an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.73 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-5.762, P < 0.001] and LC of <40.3% at T24 h had an adjusted HR of 1.98 (95% CI: 1.46-4.173, P < 0.001). The predictors of hospital mortality after PC-ECMO were the lactate level at 12 h [odds ratio (OR): 1.67, 95% CI: 1.121-2.181, P = 0.001], initial SOFA score (OR: 1.593, 95% CI: 1.15-2.73, P < 0.001), initial blood lactate (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.016-1.721, P = 0.032) and atrial fibrillation (OR: 6.17, 95% CI: 2.37-57.214, P = 0.003). Bivariate models using lactate levels and clearance at the same points revealed that blood lactate levels performed better than the clearance percentage.
    CONCLUSIONS: Serial measurements of arterial blood lactate and LC help in obtaining early prognostic guidance in adult patients supported by VA-ECMO after cardiac surgery. Absolute lactate levels, compared with LC at the same time points, demonstrated better performance in differentiating mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分是诊断败血症和量化器官功能障碍的重要工具。然而,尽管有新的证据表明女性和男性在败血症病理生理学上存在差异,性别目前不在SOFA评分中。我们旨在调查器官功能障碍的潜在性别差异,以SOFA评分衡量,并探讨脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的预后相关性。
    方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月12日期间,在85个认证瑞士ICU之一中,前瞻性纳入ICU的脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的SOFA评分的性别差异。
    结果:在125,782名患者中,5947(5%)入院,临床诊断为败血症(2244,38%)或败血症性休克(3703,62%)。其中,5078(37%的女性)有资格进行分析。女性(平均7.5±SD3.6分)和男性(7.8±3.6分,威尔科克森秩和p<0.001)。这是由凝血差异驱动的(p=0.008),肝脏(p<0.001)和肾脏(p<0.001)SOFA成分。年龄<52岁的年轻患者之间的性别差异更为明显(女性7.1±4.0分,男性8.1±4.2分,p=0.004)。ICU住院时间没有发现性别差异(女性中位数2.6天(IQR1.3-5.3)与男性2.7天(IQR1.2-6.0),p=0.13)和ICU死亡率(女性14%vs男性15%,p=0.17)。
    结论:瑞士ICU脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的SOFA评分存在性别差异,特别是在基于实验室的组件中。尽管这些差异的临床意义尚不清楚,有必要对SOFA评分成分的性别阈值进行重新评估,以便做出更准确和个性化的分类.
    BACKGROUND: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is an important tool in diagnosing sepsis and quantifying organ dysfunction. However, despite emerging evidence of differences in sepsis pathophysiology between women and men, sex is currently not being considered in the SOFA score. We aimed to investigate potential sex-specific differences in organ dysfunction, as measured by the SOFA score, in patients with sepsis or septic shock and explore outcome associations.
    METHODS: Retrospective analysis of sex-specific differences in the SOFA score of prospectively enrolled ICU patients with sepsis or septic shock admitted to one of 85 certified Swiss ICUs between 01/2021 and 12/2022.
    RESULTS: Of 125,782 patients, 5947 (5%) were admitted with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis (2244, 38%) or septic shock (3703, 62%). Of these, 5078 (37% women) were eligible for analysis. A statistically significant difference of the total SOFA score on admission was found between women (mean 7.5 ± SD 3.6 points) and men (7.8 ± 3.6 points, Wilcoxon rank-sum p < 0.001). This was driven by differences in the coagulation (p = 0.008), liver (p < 0.001) and renal (p < 0.001) SOFA components. Differences between sexes were more prominent in younger patients < 52 years of age (women 7.1 ± 4.0 points vs men 8.1 ± 4.2 points, p = 0.004). No sex-specific differences were found in ICU length of stay (women median 2.6 days (IQR 1.3-5.3) vs men 2.7 days (IQR 1.2-6.0), p = 0.13) and ICU mortality (women 14% vs men 15%, p = 0.17).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sex-specific differences exist in the SOFA score of patients admitted to a Swiss ICU with sepsis or septic shock, particularly in laboratory-based components. Although the clinical meaningfulness of these differences is unclear, a reevaluation of sex-specific thresholds for SOFA score components is warranted in an attempt to make more accurate and individualised classifications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:1)评估基线和24h血清钙卫蛋白的能力,与经典生物标志物(乳酸和降钙素原)相比,用于危重脓毒症患者28天死亡率的预后;和2)建立结合三种生物标志物的预测模型。
    方法:单中心,回顾性研究。
    方法:大学医院重症监护病房。
    方法:纳入了一百七十三个脓毒症患者。
    方法:测量基线乳酸,降钙素原和钙卫蛋白水平以及降钙素原和钙卫蛋白水平在24小时。
    方法:人口统计学和合并症,入住ICU的SOFA评分,基线乳酸,入院时降钙素原和钙卫蛋白以及24小时和28天死亡率。
    结果:1)入住ICU时,乳酸是唯一具有显著准确性的生物标志物(AUC:0.698);2)在24小时,降钙素原和钙网蛋白水平无差异.降钙素原和钙卫蛋白清除率在非存活者中显著较低,并且均达到中等性能(AUC:分别为0.668和0.664);3)基于生物标志物的模型达到了显着的准确性(AUC:0.766),仅SOFA评分有增加趋势(AUC:0.829);y4)基线乳酸水平、降钙素原和钙卫蛋白清除率是结局的独立预测因子.
    结论:1)基线和24小时钙网和降钙素原水平缺乏预测28天死亡率的能力;2)两种生物标志物清除的准确性中等;3)SOFA评分和基于预测生物标志物的模型的组合显示出较高的预后准确性。
    OBJECTIVE: 1) To evaluate the ability of baseline and on 24 h serum calprotectin, in comparison to canonical biomarkers (lactate and procalcitonin), for prognosis of 28-day mortality in critically ill septic patients; and 2) To develop a predictive model combining the three biomarkers.
    METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study.
    METHODS: Intensive Care Unit of a university hospital.
    METHODS: One hundred and seventy three septic pacientes were included.
    METHODS: Measurement of baseline lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin level and procalcitonin and calprotectin levels on 24 h.
    METHODS: Demographics and comorbidities, SOFA score on ICU admission, baseline lactate, procalcitonin and calprotectin on admission and on 24 h and 28-day mortality.
    RESULTS: 1) On ICU admission, lactate was the only biomarker achieving a significant accuracy (AUC: 0.698); 2) On 24 h, no differences were found on procalcitonin and calprotectin levels. Procalcitonin and calprotectin clearances were significantly lower in non-survivors and both achieved a moderate performance (AUCs: 0.668 and 0.664, respectively); 3) A biomarker based-model achieved a significant accuracy (AUC: 0.766), trending to increase (AUC: 0.829) to SOFA score alone; y 4) Baseline lactate levels and procalcitonin and calprotectin clearance were independent predictors for the outcome.
    CONCLUSIONS: 1) Baseline and on 24 h calprotectina and procalcitonin levels lacked ability in predicting 28-day mortality; 2) Accuracy of clearance of both biomarkers was moderate; and 3) Combination of SOFA score and the predictive biomarker based-model showed a high prognostic accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在重症监护病房(ICU)中起着至关重要的作用,可以提供患者器官功能或衰竭程度的可靠指标。然而,精确的评估是耗时的,ICU临床实践中的日常评估可能具有挑战性。
    方法:创建了ICU环境中的真实场景,和ChatGPT4.0Plus的数据挖掘精度,巴德,使用Spearman's以及关于确定SOFA评分的准确性的组内相关系数评估了困惑AI。
    结果:在实际SOFA评分与通过ChatGPT4.0Plus计算的评分之间观察到最强的相关性(r相关系数0.92)(p<0.001)。相比之下,实际SOFA与Bard计算的SOFA之间的相关性中等(r=0.59,p=0.070),虽然与困惑AI的相关性很大,在0.89,p<0.001。SOFA与ChatGPT4.0Plus的类间相关系数分析,巴德,困惑AI为ICC=0.94。
    结论:人工智能(AI)工具,特别是ChatGPT4.0Plus,在ICU设置中通过AI数据挖掘协助自动进行SOFA分数计算方面表现出重大希望。它们提供了减少人工工作量并提高连续患者监测和评估效率的途径。然而,进一步的开发和验证是必要的,以确保在重症监护环境的准确性和可靠性。
    OBJECTIVE: The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score plays a crucial role in intensive care units (ICUs) by providing a reliable measure of a patient\'s organ function or extent of failure. However, the precise assessment is time-consuming, and daily assessment in clinical practice in the ICU can be challenging.
    METHODS: Realistic scenarios in an ICU setting were created, and the data mining precision of ChatGPT 4.0 Plus, Bard, and Perplexity AI were assessed using Spearman\'s as well as the intraclass correlation coefficients regarding the accuracy in determining the SOFA score.
    RESULTS: The strongest correlation was observed between the actual SOFA score and the score calculated by ChatGPT 4.0 Plus (r correlation coefficient 0.92) (p<0.001). In contrast, the correlation between the actual SOFA and that calculated by Bard was moderate (r=0.59, p=0.070), while the correlation with Perplexity AI was substantial, at 0.89, with a p<0.001. The interclass correlation coefficient analysis of SOFA with those of ChatGPT 4.0 Plus, Bard, and Perplexity AI was ICC=0.94.
    CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools, particularly ChatGPT 4.0 Plus, show significant promise in assisting with automated SOFA score calculations via AI data mining in ICU settings. They offer a pathway to reduce the manual workload and increase the efficiency of continuous patient monitoring and assessment. However, further development and validation are necessary to ensure accuracy and reliability in a critical care environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号