sofa score

SOFA 评分
  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:重度中暑患者乳酸水平与多器官功能障碍之间的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在阐明乳酸在重度中暑预后中的临床意义,并评估将乳酸纳入SOFA评分是否能改善其预测效能.
    方法:本研究是一项多中心回顾性队列调查,纳入了275例患者。进行Logistic回归分析以检查乳酸水平与患者预后和并发症之间的关系。包括急性肾损伤(AKI),弥散性血管内凝血(DIC),和心肌损伤。Further,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和临床决策曲线分析(DCA)评估乳酸和SOFA评分对重度中暑相关死亡的预测能力.最后,采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线来区分不同患者组的生存率.
    结果:调整混杂因素后,乳酸被证明是死亡的独立危险因素(OR=1.353,95%CI[1.170,1.569]),AKI(OR=1.158,95%CI[1.007,1.332]),DIC(OR=1.426,95%CI[1.225,1.659]),和心肌损伤(OR=2.039,95%CI[1.553,2.679])。乳酸预测严重中暑死亡的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.7540,临界值为3.35。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析显示,乳酸水平升高的患者死亡率较高。此外,ROC曲线表明,在重度中暑患者中,乳酸与SOFA评分相结合提供了比单独SOFA评分更好的预测功效(AUC:0.9025vs.0.8773,DeLong试验,P<0.001)。最后,DCA曲线显示乳酸结合SOFA评分的临床净获益率较高.
    结论:乳酸是严重中暑相关死亡的独立危险因素,也是AKI的危险因素。DIC,以及与严重中暑相关的心肌损伤。因此,乳酸与SOFA评分相结合可显著提高重症中暑患者的预测效能。
    The relationship between lactate levels and multiple organ dysfunction in patients with severe heatstroke remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to elucidate the clinical significance of lactate in severe heatstroke prognosis and assess whether incorporating lactate in the SOFA score improves its predictive efficacy.
    This study was a multicenter retrospective cohort investigation included 275 patients. Logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between lactate levels and patient outcomes and complications, including acute kidney injury (AKI), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), and myocardial injury. Further, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive power of lactate and SOFA scores in severe heatstroke-associated death. Lastly, the Kaplan-Meier survival curve was employed to differentiate the survival rates among the various patient groups.
    After adjusting for confounding factors, lactate was demonstrated as an independent risk factor for death (OR = 1.353, 95% CI [1.170, 1.569]), AKI (OR = 1.158, 95% CI [1.007, 1.332]), DIC (OR = 1.426, 95% CI [1.225, 1.659]), and myocardial injury (OR = 2.039, 95% CI [1.553, 2.679]). The area under the curve (AUC) of lactate for predicting death from severe heatstroke was 0.7540, with a cutoff of 3.35. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis showed that patients with elevated lactate levels had higher mortality rates. Additionally, the ROC curves demonstrated that combining lactate with the SOFA score provided better predictive efficacy than the SOFA score alone in patients with severe heatstroke (AUC: 0.9025 vs. 0.8773, DeLong test, P < 0.001). Finally, the DCA curve revealed a higher net clinical benefit rate for lactate combined with the SOFA score.
    Lactate is an independent risk factor for severe heatstroke-related death as well as a risk factor for AKI, DIC, and myocardial injury associated with severe heatstroke. Thus, combining lactate with the SOFA score can significantly improve its predictive efficacy in patients with severe heatstroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    游离甲状腺激素T3(FT3)的减少可用作ICU死亡风险的独立预后指标。然而,FT3作为预测标记受到其准确性的阻碍。该研究引入了动态FT3数据的概念,以支持FT3作为预后工具的价值。因此,这项研究的目的是研究动态FT3演变在综合ICU环境中的预后价值,分析动态FT3变化与疾病严重程度变化之间的一致性,探讨FT3作为临床治疗实时反馈客观指标的可行性。
    采用单中心前瞻性观察研究,FT3测量在登记后的多天进行,收集相应的临床资料。为了研究FT3的动态变化模式,其在预测28天死亡风险中的预后意义。动态FT3变化与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分差异的一致性.
    与最低点相比,存活组表现出更高的最后FT3水平(p<0.05),而死亡组差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。该研究还确定了第5天的FT3和SOFA评分之间的最佳相关性(最佳相关系数-0.546)。FT3在第5天的ROC曲线产生0.88的最佳AUC,优于SOFA评分。这项研究对FT3曲线模式进行了分类,这些模式的Kaplan-Meier生存分析强调了下降型曲线与死亡风险增加显著相关(P<0.001)。此外,本研究探讨了FT3和SOFA评分变化的一致性.虽然总体一致性率不高,亚组分析显示,更严重的疾病导致更高的一致性率.
    本研究引入了动态FT3变化的概念,以增强其在综合ICU设置中的预后效用。研究确定第5天是预测疗效的最佳时间点,下降的FT3曲线表明预后不良。虽然与SOFA分数的总体一致性不高,这种相关性随着疾病严重程度的增加而增强。
    Decrease in free thyroid hormone T3 (FT3) can be used as an independent prognostic indicator for the risk of death in ICUs. However, FT3 as a predictive marker is hindered by its accuracy. The study introduces the concept of dynamic FT3 data as a means to bolster the value of FT3 as a prognostic tool. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of dynamic FT3 evolution in a comprehensive ICU setting, analyze the consistency between dynamic FT3 changes and variations in disease severity, and explore the feasibility of FT3 as an objective indicator for real-time clinical treatment feedback.
    Employing a single-center prospective observational study, FT3 measurements were taken on multiple days following enrollment, corresponding clinical data were collected. To investigated the pattern of dynamic changes of FT3,its prognostic significance in forecasting the risk of 28-day mortality, the alignment between dynamic FT3 changes and variations in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.
    The survival group exhibited higher last FT3 levels compared to the lowest point (p<0.05), while the death group did not show statistically significant differences (p>0.05). The study also identifies the optimal correlation between FT3 and SOFA score at day 5 (optimal correlation coefficient -0.546).The ROC curve for FT3 at day 5 yielded an optimal AUC of 0.88, outperforming the SOFA score. The study categorizes FT3 curve patterns,Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of these patterns highlighted that the descending-type curve was significantly associated with increased risk of death (P<0.001). Additionally, the research explores the consistency between changes in FT3 and SOFA scores. While overall consistency rates were modest, subgroup analyses unveiled that greater disease severity led to higher consistency rates.
    This study introduces the concept of dynamic FT3 changes to augment its prognostic utility in comprehensive ICU settings. The research identifies day 5 as the optimal time point for predictive efficacy, the descending FT3 curve as indicative of poor prognosis. While overall consistency with SOFA scores is modest, the correlation strengthens with greater disease severity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2016年,在脓毒症3.0的定义中,SOFA评分被提出作为诊断的主要评价体系,SOFA评分成为脓毒症新的研究热点。有些人对使用SOFA评分诊断败血症持怀疑态度。不同地区的专家学者提出了不同的,SOFA评分的修改版本,以弥补使用SOFA评分诊断脓毒症的相关问题。在综合各地区专家学者提出的SOFA的不同改进型的同时,本文还总结了近年来提出的脓毒症的相关定义,改进的SOFA评分应用框架。此外,本文描述并讨论了与脓毒症相关的机器学习和SOFA评分之间的比较。一起来看,通过总结近年来提出的改进的SOFA评分在脓毒症相关定义中的应用,我们认为SOFA评分仍然是诊断脓毒症的有效手段,但在今后脓毒症不断细化发展的过程中,SOFA评分需要进一步细化和改进,以便针对不同患者人群或针对脓毒症的应用指导提供更准确的应对策略.在大数据背景下,机器学习具有不可估量的价值和意义,但是它未来的应用应该增加更多的人文参考和帮助。
    In 2016, the SOFA score was proposed as the main evaluation system for diagnosis in the definition of sepsis 3.0, and the SOFA score has become a new research focus in sepsis. Some people are skeptical about diagnosing sepsis using the SOFA score. Experts and scholars from different regions have proposed different, modified versions of SOFA score to make up for the related problems with the use of the SOFA score in the diagnosis of sepsis. While synthesizing the different improved versions of SOFA proposed by experts and scholars in various regions, this paper also summarizes the relevant definitions of sepsis put forward in recent years to build a clear, improved application framework of SOFA score. In addition, the comparison between machine learning and SOFA scores related to sepsis is described and discussed in the article. Taken together, by summarizing the application of the improved SOFA score proposed in recent years in the related definition of sepsis, we believe that the SOFA score is still an effective means of diagnosing sepsis, but in the process of the continuous refinement and development of sepsis in the future, the SOFA score needs to be further refined and improved to provide more accurate coping strategies for different patient populations or application directions regarding sepsis. Against the big data background, machine learning has immeasurable value and significance, but its future applications should add more humanistic references and assistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Frailty has been considered to be associated with major mortality and increased length of stay after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to explore the predictive potential of frailty assessment in the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing bypass surgery.
    This study assessed the preoperative frailty according to the Fried\'s frailty phenotype, and included 150 frail and 150 non-frail elderly patients (≥ 65 y) who underwent bypass surgery. The present study evaluated the prognosis of elderly patients based on sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and collected clinical indicators to construct logistic regression models with the prognosis as the dependent variable, to explore the potential predictive ability of preoperative frailty. Moreover, this study focused on the complications and analyzed the relationship between preoperative frailty and postoperative complications.
    In the present study, 244 patients were divided into the favorable prognosis group and 56 patients were divided into the unfavorable prognosis group. Logistic regression analysis showed that increased myoglobin and high cardiac function classification were independent risk factors for unfavorable prognosis in elderly patients undergoing bypass surgery. The discrimination of the clinical prediction model was determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under curve (AUC) was 0.928. After adding preoperative frailty assessment, the AUC was improved to 0.939. This study found a significant correlation between preoperative frailty and postoperative complications, mainly in the circulatory system.
    Preoperative frailty assessment could be a predictive factor for the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. According to our study, frailty assessment and appropriate intervention before bypass surgery may be beneficial to the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery.
    The clinical study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (2021-SR-393). All patients signed an informed consent form.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:研究表明迷走神经介导的炎症反射可以抑制脓毒症动物中细胞因子的产生和炎症。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)对脓毒症患者炎症反应及病情严重程度的影响。
    方法:随机,双盲,进行了假对照试验研究.20名脓毒症患者被随机分配接受taVNS或假刺激连续五天。用血清细胞因子水平评估刺激作用,急性生理与慢性健康评价(APACHE)Ⅱ评分,基线和第3天、第5天和第7天的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。
    结果:TaVNS在研究人群中耐受性良好。接受taVNS的患者血清TNF-α显着降低,IL-1β,IL-6和IL-8水平和IL-4和IL-10水平增加。与taVNS组中的基线相比,在第5天和第7天降低SOFA评分。然而,假刺激组无变化.taVNS在第7天至第1天的细胞因子变化大于假刺激。两组患者的APACHEⅡ评分和SOFA评分无明显差异。
    结论:TaVNS导致脓毒症患者血清促炎细胞因子显著降低,血清抗炎细胞因子显著升高。
    Studies have shown that vagus nerve-mediated inflammatory reflex could inhibit cytokine production and inflammation in sepsis animals.
    This study aimed to explore the efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on inflammation and disease severity of sepsis patients.
    A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot study was performed. Twenty sepsis patients were randomly assigned to receive taVNS or sham stimulation for five consecutive days. Stimulation effect was assessed with serum cytokine levels, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ score, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at baseline and on Day 3, Day 5, and Day 7.
    TaVNS was well tolerated in the study population. Patients receiving taVNS experienced significant reductions in serum TNF-α and IL-1β levels and increases in IL-4 and IL-10 levels. SOFA scores decreased on Day 5 and Day 7 compared with baseline in the taVNS group. However, no changes were found in sham stimulation group. The changes of cytokine from Day 7 to Day 1 were greater with taVNS than sham stimulation. No differences in the APACHE Ⅱ score and SOFA score were observed between the two groups.
    TaVNS resulted in significantly lower serum pro-inflammatory cytokines and higher serum anti-inflammatory cytokines in sepsis patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:确定严重烧伤患者的吸入性损伤的严重程度很重要。氧合指数PaO2/FiO2(PF)比值是吸入性损伤的关键临床指标。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)旨在评估人群中危重病的急性发生率。我们希望根据呼吸SOFA评分对严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的生存或预后因素进行评估。
    方法:本研究是对四川大学华西医院烧伤整形外科2010年7月至2021年3月所有住院患者的回顾性队列研究。使用Cox回归模型分析数据以确定死亡率的重要预测因子。使用具有对数秩检验的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行死亡事件时间的生存分析。所有潜在的危险因素都被认为是自变量,而生存率被认为是风险因变量。
    结果:符合纳入和排除标准的118例严重烧伤吸入性损伤患者被纳入,其中男性占76.3%。平均年龄和住院时间为45.9(14.8)岁和44.3(38.4)天。火焰烧伤是烧伤的主要病因(74.6%)。呼吸SOFA评分大于2的患者接受了机械通气。单变量Kaplan-Meier分析确定年龄,烧伤总表面积(TBSA),ICU入院和呼吸SOFA评分是生存的重要因素。Cox回归分析显示TBSA和呼吸SOFA评分与患者生存相关(p<0.001)。在一些严重烧伤和吸入性损伤的患者中,生存概率降至10%以下(TBSA大于80%:8.9%,呼吸SOFA评分大于2:5.6%).本研究统计发现,具有呼吸SOFA评分模型(AUROC:0.955)和rBaux评分(AUROC:0.927)的TBSA具有相似的预测值(p=0.175)。
    结论:研究表明,高呼吸系统SOFA评分被认为是严重烧伤患者住院期间发生吸入性损伤的一个强有力的独立预测因子。当与TBSA结合使用时,呼吸SOFA评分可动态评估患者肺损伤的严重程度,提高预测水平.
    It is important to determine the severity of inhalation injury in severely burned patients. The oxygenation index PaO2/FiO2(PF) ratio is a key clinical indicator of inhalation injury. Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) is developed to assess the acute incidence of critical illness in the population. We hope to provide an assessment of survival or prognostic factor for severely burned patients with inhalation injury based on the respiratory SOFA score.
    This is a retrospective cohort study of all admissions to Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery at West China Hospital of Sichuan University from July 2010 to March 2021. Data was analyzed using Cox regression models to determine significant predictors of mortality. Survival analysis with time to death event was performed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve with the log-rank test. All potential risk factors were considered independent variables, while survival was considered the risk dependent variable.
    One hundred eighteen severe burn patients with inhalation injury who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were admitted, including men accounted for 76.3%. The mean age and length of stay were 45.9 (14.8) years and 44.3 (38.4) days. Flame burns are the main etiology of burn (74.6%). Patients with the respiratory SOFA score greater than 2 have undergone mechanical ventilation. Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis identified age, total body surface area burned (TBSA), ICU admission and the respiratory SOFA score as significant factors on survival. Cox regression analysis showed that TBSA and the respiratory SOFA score were associated with patient survival (p < 0.001). In some patients with severe burns and inhalation damage, the survival probability drops to less than 10% (TBSA greater than 80%: 8.9% and respiratory SOFA score greater than 2: 5.6%). This study statistically found that the TBSA with the respiratory SOFA score model (AUROC: 0.955) and the rBaux score (AUROC: 0.927) had similar predictive value (p = 0.175).
    The study indicates that a high respiratory system SOFA score was identified as a strong and independent predictor of severely burned patients with inhalation injury during hospitalization. When combined with TBSA, the respiratory SOFA scores can dynamically assess the severity of the patient\'s lung injury and improve the predictive level.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UASSIGNED:鲍曼不动杆菌是引起医院感染的最重要的致病菌之一,具有很高的死亡率。评估与鲍曼不动杆菌相关的微生物学特征和预后的危险因素至关重要。在这项研究中,目的探讨鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症患者的临床特点及预后危险因素。
    UNASSIGNED:本研究根据2017年至2022年在三级教学医院就诊的鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症患者的临床资料,回顾性分析了病原体的抗生素耐药性。Logistic回归和决策树确定了鲍曼贫血患者的预后危险因素。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行MDR与非MDR组之间的生存分析。使用受试者-工作特征曲线下面积(ROC曲线)比较APACHEII评分和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的预测值。
    未经授权:共纳入110例鲍曼不动杆菌血培养阳性的患者。大多数患者来自重症监护病房(ICU)病房。药敏结果显示鲍曼不动杆菌对粘菌素的耐药率最低(1.1%),其次是替加环素(3.6%)。MDR组的生存时间明显短于非MDR组。多变量分析表明,APACHEⅡ评分和SOFA评分是影响鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症28天预后的独立危险因素。两个评分都显示出优异的AUROC(SOFA:0.909,APACHEII:0.895预测28天死亡率)。两种评分系统高度相关,预测差异无统计学意义(r2=0.4410,P<0.001)。我们发现SOFA>7和APACHEII>21与显著较高的死亡率相关。
    未经评估:A.鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症在ICU中发病率最高,具有较高的耐药性和死亡率。MDR鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症患者的生存时间明显缩短。SOFA评分和APACHEⅡ评分可反映鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症患者的病情严重程度,并评估28d预后。此外,为了方便计算,在预测鲍曼不动杆菌菌血症的死亡率方面,SOFA评分在临床上可能比APACHEII评分更有用.
    UNASSIGNED: Acinetobacter baumannii is one of the most important pathogenic bacteria causing nosocomial infections and has a high mortality rate. Assessment of the microbiological characteristics and risk factors on prognosis associated with A.baumannii is essential. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic risk factors of patients with A.baumannii bacteremia.
    UNASSIGNED: This study retrospectively analyzed the antibiotic resistance of pathogens based on the clinical data of A.baumannii bacteremia patients presented in a tertiary teaching hospital from 2017 to 2022. Logistic regression and decision tree identified the prognostic risk factors for patients with baumannemia. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis between MDR and Non-MDR groups. The area under receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to compare the predictive value of the APACHE II score and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 110 patients with positive A. Baumannii blood cultures were included. Most of the patients were from intensive care unit (ICU) wards. The drug sensitivity results showed that the resistance rate of A. baumannii to colistin was the lowest (1.1%), followed by tigecycline (3.6%).The survival time of MDR group was significantly shorter than that of Non-MDR group. Multivariate analysis showed that, APACHE II score and SOFA score were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of 28 days of A.baumannii bacteremia. And both scores displayed excellent AUROCs (SOFA: 0.909, APACHE II: 0.895 in predicting 28-day mortality). The two scoring systems were highly correlated and predicted no significant difference (r 2 = 0.4410, P < 0.001). We found that SOFA > 7 and APACHE II > 21 are associated with significantly higher mortality rates.
    UNASSIGNED: A.baumannii bacteremia have the highest incidence in the ICU, with high drug resistance and mortality rates. The survival time of patients with MDR A. Baumannii bacteremia was significantly shortened. The SOFA score and APACHE II score can reflect the severity of A.baumannii bacteremia patients and evaluate the 28-day prognosis. In addition, for the convenience of calculation, the SOFA score may be more clinically useful than the APACHE II score in predicting the mortality rate of A.baumannii bacteremia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们试图确定心脏重症监护病房首日序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分的预测能力,以及将阴离子间隙(AG)与SOFA评分(SOFA-AG)相结合的新评分。
    方法:信息来自重症监护医疗信息集市III(MIMICIII1.4)数据库。我们绘制了入院后第一天最大AG和90天死亡率之间的关系。根据风险比(HR)将患者分为五组,并分配0、1、2、3或4分的评分。我们比较了SOFA和SOFA-AG的接受者工作特征曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)。
    结果:共确定1316例患者,分为以下五组:AG8至<16mmol/L;AG16至<17mmol/L;AG17至<19mmol/L;AG19至<21mmol/L;AG≥21mmol/L。在第7天,SOFA-AG评分的AUC高于SOFA评分(0.770vs.0.711;P<0.001),14天(0.751vs.0.692;P<0.001),28天(0.741vs.0.684;P<0.001),和90天(0.727vs.0.667;P<0.001)。
    结论:SOFA评分仅对心脏重症监护病房入院后7天死亡率显示中等预测值,但SOFA-AG评分在入院后长达90天的预测能力有所提高.
    BACKGROUND: We attempted to determine the predictive ability of the first-day Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in the cardiac intensive care unit, as well as a new score combining the anion gap (AG) with the SOFA score (SOFA-AG).
    METHODS: Information was obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC III 1.4) database. We plotted the relationship between the maximum first-day AG and 90-day mortality after admission to the care unit. Patients were divided into five groups based on the hazard ratio (HR) and assigned scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 points. We compared the area under the curve (AUC) for the receiver-operating characteristic curve of the SOFA and that of the SOFA-AG.
    RESULTS: A total of 1316 patients were identified and divided into the following five groups: AG 8 to <16 mmol/L; AG 16 to <17 mmol/L; AG 17 to <19 mmol/L; AG 19 to <21 mmol/L; and AG ≥ 21 mmol/L. The SOFA-AG score had a greater AUC than the SOFA score at 7 days (0.770 vs. 0.711; P < 0.001), 14 days (0.751 vs. 0.692; P < 0.001), 28 days (0.741 vs. 0.684; P < 0.001), and 90 days (0.727 vs. 0.667; P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The SOFA score showed moderate predictive value only for 7-day mortality after admission to the cardiac intensive care unit, but the SOFA-AG score had improved predictive ability for up to 90 days after admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:本研究的目的是探讨白细胞介素-6(IL-6)在急诊败血症患者中的诊断和预后价值。
    UNASSIGNED:共有128名患者到北京朝阳医院西院急诊科就诊,隶属于首都医科大学,从2021年11月到2022年2月接受了这项研究。根据脓毒症-3.0诊断标准,将患者分为非脓毒症组(65例)和脓毒症组(63例)。比较两组患者的人口统计学数据和临床特征。血清生物标志物水平包括IL-6,血尿素氮(BUN),将乳酸(Lac)与序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分进行比较。采用Logistic回归分析独立危险因素,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)法分析曲线下面积(AUC)以确定标志物的诊断和预后价值。
    UNASSIGNED:与非脓毒症患者相比,IL-6,PCT,脓毒症患者CRP和BUN显著高于(10.84(4.41-27.01):92.22(21.53-201.12),0.03(0.01-0.1):0.49(0.08-3.1),8.3(0.5-31.8):39.8(10.3-98.6),7.01(4.90-11.74):13.03(6.93-25.99),所有p=0.001)。IL-6、BUN和平均动脉压(MAP)是脓毒症诊断的独立危险因素。IL-6、BUN、MAP和IL-6+BUN+MAP分别为0.764、0.696、0.685和0.848。乳酸,年龄和SOFA评分是脓毒症患者28日死亡率的独立危险因素.Lac的AUC,年龄,预测脓毒症患者28天死亡的SOFA评分和Lac+年龄+SOFA评分分别为0.679、0.626、0.747和0.819。
    未经证实:IL-6是脓毒症诊断的独立预测因子,血BUN和MAP的组合具有优越的诊断性能。Lac,年龄,SOFA评分可以有效预测脓毒症患者的临床结局。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study was to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in sepsis patients presenting to the emergency department.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 128 patients who visited the emergency department of West Hospital of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, affiliated to Capital Medical University, from November 2021 to February 2022 were subjected to this study. According to Sepsis-3.0 diagnostic criteria for sepsis, patients were divided into non-sepsis group (65 cases) and sepsis group (63 cases). Demographic data and clinical characteristics of the two patient groups were compared. Serum levels of biomarkers including IL-6, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and lactic acid (Lac) were compared with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. Logistic regression was used to analyze independent risk factors and Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) method was used to analyze the Area Under the Curve (AUC) to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of markers.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with non-sepsis patients, levels of IL-6, PCT, CRP and BUN were significantly higher in sepsis patients (10.84 (4.41-27.01): 92.22 (21.53-201.12), 0.03 (0.01-0.1):0.49 (0.08-3.1), 8.3 (0.5-31.8):39.8(10.3-98.6), 7.01 (4.90-11.74):13.03 (6.93-25.99), all p = 0.001). IL-6, BUN and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were independent risk factors for sepsis diagnosis. AUC values of IL-6, BUN, MAP and IL-6+BUN+MAP were 0.764, 0.696, 0.685, and 0.848, respectively. Lactate, age and SOFA score were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients. The AUC of Lac, age, SOFA score and Lac+age+SOFA score to predict 28-day death in sepsis patients was 0.679, 0.626, 0.747, and 0.819, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: IL-6 is an independent predictor of sepsis diagnosis, and the combination of blood BUN and MAP has superior diagnostic performance. Lac, age, and SOFA score could effectively predict clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:探讨Barthel评分的护理预测价值,非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)住院患者的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和D-二聚体。
    UNASSIGNED:对急诊科收治的358例NSTEMI患者的临床资料进行logistic回归方程分析,并绘制ROC曲线。比较不同指标的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)。建立了COX回归模型,并绘制了生存曲线。
    未经评估:年龄差异显著,D-二聚体,WBC,NT-proBNP,EF(%),BI得分,MEWS得分,28天死亡组与存活组之间的SOFA评分(P<0.05)。结果显示D-二聚体(P=0.002),SOFA评分(P=0.017),BI评分(P<0.001),胸痛症状(P<0.001)是28天死亡的独立预测因子。当胸痛症状(AUC=0.585),D-二聚体(AUC=0.945,Z=8.00,P<0.01),BI评分(AUC=0.145,Z=5.36,P<0.01),与SOFA评分(AUC=0.847,Z=4.93,P<0.01)比较,结果表明,BI评分(HR=0.961,P<0.01)和SOFA评分(HR=1.316,P<0.001)对死亡患者28天生存时间具有统计学意义。
    未经授权:Barthel得分,SOFA得分,D-二聚体对预测NSTEMI患者的严重程度均有重要意义,具有较高的护理评价价值。Barthel和SOFA评分与28天内的死亡风险相关。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the nursing prediction value of Barthel score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and D-dimer on non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) inpatients.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical data of 358 NSTEMI patients admitted to the emergency department were analyzed using logistic regression equation and a ROC curve was drawn. The area under ROC curve (AUC) of different indicators was compared. A COX regression model was created, and a survival curve was drawn.
    UNASSIGNED: There were significant differences in age, D-dimer, WBC, NT-proBNP, EF (%), BI score, MEWS score, and SOFA score between the 28-day death group and the survival group (P < 0.05). The results showed that D-dimer (P = 0.002), SOFA score (P = 0.017), BI score (P < 0.001), and chest pain symptoms (P < 0.001) were independent predictors of 28-day death. When chest pain symptoms (AUC = 0.585), D-dimer (AUC = 0.945, Z = 8.00, P < 0.01), BI score (AUC = 0.145, Z = 5.36, P < 0.01), and SOFA score (AUC = 0.847, Z = 4.93, P < 0.01) were compared, the results showed that BI score (HR = 0.961, P < 0.01) and SOFA score (HR = 1.316, P < 0.001) had statistical significance on the 28-day survival time of the dead patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The Barthel score, SOFA score, and D-dimer are all essential in predicting the severity of NSTEMI patients, with a high nursing evaluation value. The Barthel and SOFA scores are associated with the risk of death within 28 days.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号