skin and soft tissue infections

皮肤和软组织感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了分析抗生素耐药性,毒力基因,和金黄色葡萄球菌的分子分型(S.金黄色葡萄球菌)在第一附属医院皮肤和软组织感染中分离出的菌株,赣南医科大学,为了更好地了解金黄色葡萄球菌的分子流行病学特征。
    2023年,从皮肤和软组织感染的患者中分离出65株金黄色葡萄球菌菌株。使用VITEK2和革兰氏阳性菌鉴定卡进行菌株鉴定和药敏试验。用DNA提取试剂盒提取DNA,所有基因都用聚合酶链反应扩增。多位点序列分型(MLST)用于分子分型。
    在这项研究中,对65株金黄色葡萄球菌菌株进行了对16种抗生素的敏感性测试,青霉素G耐药率最高,达95.4%。葡萄球菌分离株均未显示对头孢洛林的耐药性,达托霉素,利奈唑胺,替加环素,替考拉宁,或者万古霉素.fnbA是皮肤和软组织感染中分离的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株中最普遍的毒力基因(100%),其次是arcA(98.5%)。统计分析表明,耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对各种抗生素的耐药率明显高于耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌。五十个序列类型(STs),包括44个新的,由MLST鉴定。
    在这项研究中,确定了金黄色葡萄球菌对青霉素G的高耐药率以及毒力基因fnbA和arcA的高携带率,并确定了44个新的STs,这可能与江西南部的地理位置和当地抗生素使用趋势有关。研究这些地区金黄色葡萄球菌的克隆谱系和进化关系有助于理解其分子流行病学,为病原菌的预防和治疗提供实验依据。
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the antibiotic resistance profile, virulence genes, and molecular typing of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) strains isolated in skin and soft tissue infections at the First Affiliated Hospital, Gannan Medical University, to better understand the molecular epidemiological characteristics of S. aureus.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2023, 65 S. aureus strains were isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Strain identification and susceptibility tests were performed using VITEK 2 and gram-positive bacteria identification cards. DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit, and all genes were amplified using polymerase chain reaction. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) was used for molecular typing.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, of the 65 S. aureus strains were tested for their susceptibility to 16 antibiotics, the highest resistance rate to penicillin G was 95.4%. None of the staphylococcal isolates showed resistance to ceftaroline, daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline, teicoplanin, or vancomycin. fnbA was the most prevalent virulence gene (100%) in S. aureus strains isolated in skin and soft tissue infections, followed by arcA (98.5%). Statistical analyses showed that the resistance rates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates to various antibiotics were significantly higher than those of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates. Fifty sequence types (STs), including 44 new ones, were identified by MLST.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, the high resistance rate to penicillin G and the high carrying rate of virulence gene fnbA and arcA of S.aureus were determine, and 44 new STs were identified, which may be associated with the geographical location of southern Jiangxi and local trends in antibiotic use. The study of the clonal lineage and evolutionary relationships of S. aureus in these regions may help in understanding the molecular epidemiology and provide the experimental basis for pathogenic bacteria prevention and treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    进入21世纪,美国皮肤和软组织感染(STTI)的患者数量似乎正在增加。然而,最近没有数据证实这一趋势。
    这次回顾展,观察性队列研究使用了Optum去识别的诊所数据集市数据库中超过11年(2010-2020年)的索赔数据.SSTI情节,并发症,并使用国际疾病分类代码确定合并症。SSTI年发病率,复发性SSTI的比例,SSTI相关死亡,并估算了总成本。
    在研究期间,540万患者经历了910万SSTI发作,发生率为77.5(95%置信区间,77.4-77.5)每1000人年观察(PYO)。年发病率随时间变化不明显。在没有合并症的患者中,SSTI发作的总发生率(每1000个PYO)为32.1(以前的SSTI发生率最高[113.5]),如果存在合并症,则发生率更高。慢性溃疡的发病率(每1000个PYO)随着时间的推移从11.3增加到18.2(P<.0001),复杂疾病从3.5增加到6.3(P<.0001)。SSTI住院后30天内的死亡人数从2.6%上升到2020年的4.6%。复发发生在26.3%的索引病例中。SSTI发作的平均费用为3334美元(中位数为190美元),手术部位感染和慢性溃疡的费用最高。
    尽管总体发病率稳定,但美国SSTI的流行病学正在发生变化,疾病负担正在增加。这些数据可以为确定可以从有针对性的干预措施中受益的优先人群提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: The number of patients with skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in the United States appeared to be increasing well into the 21st century. However, no recent data have confirmed this trend.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective, observational cohort study used claims data over 11 years (2010-2020) from Optum\'s de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. SSTI episodes, complications, and comorbidities were identified using International Classification of Diseases codes. Annual SSTI incidence rates, proportions of recurrent SSTI, SSTI-associated deaths, and total costs were estimated.
    UNASSIGNED: During the study period, 5.4 million patients experienced 9.1 million SSTI episodes, with an incidence of 77.5 (95% confidence interval, 77.4-77.5) per 1000 person-years of observation (PYO). Annual incidence did not change significantly over time. Overall incidence (per 1000 PYO) of SSTI episodes in patients without comorbidities was 32.1 (highest incidence was for previous SSTI [113.5]) versus much higher rates if comorbidities were present. Incidence rates (per 1000 PYO) of chronic ulcers increased over time from 11.3 to 18.2 (P < .0001) and complicated disease from 3.5 to 6.3 (P < .0001). Deaths occurring within 30 days post-SSTI hospitalization rose from 2.6% to 4.6% in 2020. Recurrences occurred in 26.3% of index cases. The mean cost of an SSTI episode was US$3334 (median US$190) and was highest for surgical site infections and chronic ulcers.
    UNASSIGNED: The epidemiology of SSTI in the United States is changing and the disease burden is increasing despite stabilization in overall incidence. These data can inform identification of priority populations who could benefit from targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以前的研究主要集中在皮肤和软组织感染(STTI)的门诊病例,对住院事件的关注有限。因此,我们的目的是比较住院患者的临床参数,进行基因组表征,并确定了从这些患者中分离出的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株的Panton-Valentineleucocidin(PVL)噬菌体的亚型。我们发现PVL阳性患者的住院时间较短(平均,9vs.24天;p<0.001)和脓肿消退持续时间(平均值,8vs.13天;p<0.01)。PVL阳性MRSA诱导的SSTI更频繁地与脓肿相关[36/55(65.5%)15/124(12.1%),p<0.001],52.7%接受切开引流术;超过80%的PVL阴性患者接受切开引流术,排水,和抗生素。在接受经验性抗生素的PVL阳性患者中,抗葡萄球菌药物如万古霉素和利奈唑胺的使用频率较低(32.7%,18/55)比PVL阴性患者(74.2%,92/124),表明PVL阳性SSTI患者更可能需要手术引流而不是抗菌治疗。我们还发现ST59谱系占主导地位,无论PVL状态如何(41.34%,74/179)。此外,我们研究了lukSF-PV基因的线性结构,揭示主要集群与特定的STs相关,表明不同菌株类型对PVL的独立获取,并表明即使在同一设施中检测到的PVL阳性菌株中也观察到显着的多样性。总的来说,我们的研究提供了对临床的全面见解,遗传,以及住院患者中MRSA诱导的SSTI的噬菌体相关方面,有助于对中国人群中这些病原体的流行病学和进化有更深刻的了解。
    Previous studies have mainly focused on outpatient cases of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), with limited attention to inpatient occurrences. Thus, we aimed to compare the clinical parameters of inpatients with SSTIs, performed genomic characterization, and determined the subtypes of Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) bacteriophages of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from these patients. We found that PVL-positive patients had shorter hospital stays (mean, 9 vs. 24 days; p < 0.001) and abscess resolution durations (mean, 8 vs. 13 days; p < 0.01). PVL-positive MRSA-induced SSTIs were more frequently associated with abscesses [36/55 (65.5%) vs. 15/124 (12.1%), p < 0.001], with 52.7% undergoing incision and drainage; over 80% of PVL-negative patients received incision, drainage, and antibiotics. In PVL-positive patients receiving empirical antibiotics, anti-staphylococcal agents such as vancomycin and linezolid were administered less frequently (32.7%, 18/55) than in PVL-negative patients (74.2%, 92/124), indicating that patients with PVL-positive SSTIs are more likely to require surgical drainage rather than antimicrobial treatment. We also found that the ST59 lineage was predominant, regardless of PVL status (41.3%, 74/179). Additionally, we investigated the linear structure of the lukSF-PV gene, revealing that major clusters were associated with specific STs, suggesting independent acquisition of PVL by different strain types and indicating that significant diversity was observed even within PVL-positive strains detected in the same facility. Overall, our study provides comprehensive insights into the clinical, genetic, and phage-related aspects of MRSA-induced SSTIs in hospitalized patients and contributes to a more profound understanding of the epidemiology and evolution of these pathogens in the Chinese population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    从电子健康记录中可靠地识别皮肤和软组织感染(STTI)对于许多应用非常重要,包括质量改进,临床指南建设,和流行病学分析。然而,在美国,在结构化的临床数据中无法可靠地捕获SSTI的类型(例如感染是化脓性的还是非化脓性的?)。有了这项工作,我们使用来自美国退伍军人健康管理局(VA)的6,576份人工注释的临床笔记对基于规则的临床自然语言处理系统进行了训练和评估,目的是从临床笔记中自动提取和分类SSTI亚型.经过训练的系统实现了提及级分类的0.39至0.80的提及级和文档级性能指标,以及文档级分类的0.49至0.98的范围。
    The reliable identification of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) from electronic health records is important for a number of applications, including quality improvement, clinical guideline construction, and epidemiological analysis. However, in the United States, types of SSTIs (e.g. is the infection purulent or non-purulent?) are not captured reliably in structured clinical data. With this work, we trained and evaluated a rule-based clinical natural language processing system using 6,576 manually annotated clinical notes derived from the United States Veterans Health Administration (VA) with the goal of automatically extracting and classifying SSTI subtypes from clinical notes. The trained system achieved mention- and document-level performance metrics of the range 0.39 to 0.80 for mention level classification and 0.49 to 0.98 for document level classification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区获得性金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-Sa)皮肤和软组织感染(STTI)与人口稠密的城市地区经历高贫困率相关,静脉注射毒品,和无家可归。然而,自2010年社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌流行以来,美国对CA-SaSTTI的流行病学了解甚少。本研究考察了CA-SaSSTI在大型、地理异质性人群,并确定与感染风险增加相关的邻里特征。
    方法:使用唯一的邻域边界,加州医疗服务研究区,热点分析,我们对2016年至2019年在非联邦加州急诊科提交的所有CA-SaSTTI进行了邻里感染风险比估算.贝叶斯泊松回归模型评估了邻域水平感染风险与人口结构之间的关系,邻里贫困率,成为医疗保健短缺的地区。
    结果:在2016年至2019年期间,加利福尼亚州更多农村和山区的急诊科经历了更高的CA-SaSTTI负担。感染率高的社区更有可能有较高比例的成年人生活在联邦贫困水平以下,并且是指定的医疗保健短缺地区。在加利福尼亚社区,人口结构的测量与感染风险无关。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了加州急诊科CA-SaSSTI流行病学的潜在变化。未来的研究应该调查其他地区的CA-Sa负担,以确定流行病学的这种转变是否在其他州和人群中存在。Further,我们需要对加州各社区感染聚集的潜在机制进行更全面的评估.
    Community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus (CA-Sa) skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are historically associated with densely populated urban areas experiencing high poverty rates, intravenous drug use, and homelessness. However, the epidemiology of CA-Sa SSTIs in the United States has been poorly understood since the plateau of the Community-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus epidemic in 2010. This study examines the spatial variation of CA-Sa SSTIs in a large, geographically heterogeneous population and identifies neighborhood characteristics associated with increased infection risk.
    Using a unique neighborhood boundary, California Medical Service Study Areas, a hotspot analysis, and estimates of neighborhood infection risk ratios were conducted for all CA-Sa SSTIs presented in non-Federal California emergency departments between 2016 and 2019. A Bayesian Poisson regression model evaluated the association between neighborhood-level infection risk and population structure, neighborhood poverty rates, and being a healthcare shortage area.
    Emergency departments in more rural and mountainous parts of California experienced a higher burden of CA-Sa SSTIs between 2016 and 2019. Neighborhoods with high infection rates were more likely to have a high percentage of adults living below the federal poverty level and be a designated healthcare shortage area. Measures of population structure were not associated with infection risk in California neighborhoods.
    Our results highlight a potential change in the epidemiology of CA-Sa SSTIs in California emergency departments. Future studies should investigate the CA-Sa burden in other geographies to identify whether this shift in epidemiology holds across other states and populations. Further, a more thorough evaluation of potential mechanisms for the clustering of infections seen across California neighborhoods is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:静脉(IV)万古霉素通常用于治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的多种感染。在急诊科(ED)出院之前施用单剂量的静脉万古霉素的做法可能在临床上无效并促进抗微生物耐药性。此外,这种做法会带来不必要的感染风险以及可预防的不良反应,同时可能会增加ED住院时间(LOS).在该患者人群中,缺乏确定患者特征和客观发现的文献,这可能会促进ED未来的抗菌药物管理计划。
    方法:这是一个单中心,回顾性,对2020年1月至2023年1月在ED中观察到的接受单剂量静脉注射万古霉素并随后在没有入院的情况下从ED出院的成年患者进行描述性分析.收集了有关患者人口统计和某些合并症的信息,万古霉素的适应症和剂量,EDLOS,初始生命体征和实验室,同时服用抗生素,文化结果,30天回访ED和入院,和急诊出院时开的抗生素。
    结果:共有295例患者符合纳入标准。总共32.1%的患者符合SIRS标准。静脉万古霉素最常选择的顺序适应症是“皮肤和皮肤结构感染”(41%)。共有86.1%的患者在ED中同时使用抗生素,只有54.6%的患者在ED出院时口服了抗生素。总共80%的患者在ED访视期间获得至少一种培养物。在那些获得至少一种文化的人中,78.4%的患者有阴性培养,4.2%的患者有MRSA阳性培养,MRSA的皮肤培养是最常见的(3.1%)。在ED出院时接受和未接受口服抗生素的患者之间,30天内的ED复诊和入院没有统计学上的显着差异。
    结论:尽管先前文献报道的临床疗效和潜在风险不足,在ED出院前给予静脉一次剂量的万古霉素是临床实践中常见的。在ED中存在与IV万古霉素使用相关的增强抗菌药物管理的机会。未来的重点领域包括在临床上适当时使用口服抗菌药物,特别是皮肤和软组织感染,和抗生素过敏的澄清。
    BACKGROUND: Intravenous (IV) vancomycin is commonly used to treat a variety of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The practice of administering a single dose of IV vancomycin prior to emergency department (ED) discharge may be clinically ineffective and foster antimicrobial resistance. Furthermore, this practice introduces an unnecessary infection risk along with preventable adverse effects while potentially increasing ED length of stay (LOS). There is a paucity of literature identifying patient characteristics and objective findings in this patient population, which may foster future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in the ED.
    METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of adult patients seen in the ED between January 2020 and January 2023 who received a single dose of IV vancomycin and were subsequently discharged from the ED without hospital admission. Information was collected on patient demographics and select comorbidities, vancomycin indication and dosing, ED LOS, initial vitals and labs, concomitant antibiotics administered, culture results, 30-day return ED visits and admissions, and antibiotics prescribed at ED discharge.
    RESULTS: A total of 295 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 32.1% of patients met SIRS criteria. The most commonly selected order indication for IV vancomycin was \"skin and skin structure infection\" (41%). A total of 86.1% of patients received concomitant antibiotics in the ED and only 54.6% of patients were prescribed oral antibiotics at ED discharge. A total of 80% of patients had at least one culture obtained during the ED visit. In those who had at least one culture obtained, 78.4% of patients had negative cultures and 4.2% of patients had MRSA positive cultures, with MRSA skin cultures being the most common (3.1%). Return ED visits and admissions within 30 days were not statistically significantly different between patients who did and did not receive oral antibiotics at ED discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite a lack of clinical efficacy reported in prior literature and the potential risks, administration of a one-time dose of IV vancomycin prior to ED discharge is commonly encountered in clinical practice. There are opportunities for enhanced antimicrobial stewardship related to IV vancomycin use in the ED. Areas of future focus include the utilization of oral antimicrobials when clinically appropriate, particularly for skin and soft tissue infections, and clarification of antibiotic allergies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    副溶血性弧菌分布在世界各地的海鲜,如鱼,虾,和贝类,是海鲜传播腹泻病的主要原因。先前的研究报告了与受污染的海鲜海水接触的感染。到目前为止,11例报告由副溶血性弧菌引起的皮肤和软组织感染(STTI),其中5例患者死亡,6例存活。我们发现,通过接触受污染的水传播也会导致感染。我们报告了一名46岁的男性在被市场污水溅到后感染了副溶血性弧菌。他的病情迅速恶化,最终死亡,提示副溶血性弧菌传播的更多非典型模式在未来可能是可能的。文献综述显示,由副溶血性弧菌引起的SSTI很少见,所以,详细询问患者的暴露史可以帮助早期进行经验性药物管理。患有免疫缺陷疾病和进行性起泡的患者迫切需要强制性清创。如果在清创期间发现筋膜坏死,早期截肢可以挽救病人的生命。
    Vibrio parahaemolyticus is distributed worldwide in seafood such as fish, shrimp, and shellfish and is a major cause of seafood-borne diarrhoeal disease. Previous studies have reported infections contacting with contaminated seafood seawater. So far, 11 cases reported of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) caused by V. parahaemolyticus, which 5 patients died and 6 survived. We found that transmission through contact with contaminated water also causes infection. We report a 46-year-old male contracted V. parahaemolyticus after being splashed with market sewage. His condition deteriorated rapidly and he died eventually, suggesting that more atypical modes of V. parahaemolyticus transmission may be possible in the future. Literature review revealed that SSTIs due to V. parahaemolyticus are rare, so, detailed questioning of the patient\'s exposure history can help with empirical drug administration early. Patients with immunodeficiency disease and progressive blistering need mandatory debridement urgently. If fascial necrosis is found during debridement, early amputation may save the patient\'s life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:头孢洛林,广谱头孢菌素具有抗革兰氏阳性和几种革兰氏阴性细菌(GNB)的活性。这项研究旨在评估头孢洛林和比较剂对2016-2020年在拉丁美洲(LATAM)收集的引起皮肤和软组织感染(STTI)和呼吸道感染(RTIs)的分离株的抗菌活性,作为抗菌测试领导和监测计划(ATLAS)的一部分。
    方法:使用临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)和欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)标准确定最小抑制浓度。
    结果:头孢洛林对甲氧西林敏感的金黄色葡萄球菌表现出有效的活性(CLSI/EUCAST:MIC900.25mg/L;敏感性100%),而针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的活性因SSTIs(MIC901mg/L;敏感性92.5%)和RTIs分离株(MIC902mg/L;敏感性72.9%)而有所不同。对于肺炎链球菌,特别是青霉素耐药菌株通常会引起呼吸道感染,发现头孢洛林活性高(MIC900.25mg/L;敏感性100%/98.4%)。所有分离的β-溶血性链球菌对头孢洛林敏感[。无乳:MIC900.03mg/L(SSTIs);MIC900.015mg/L(RTIs);敏感性100%;化脓性链球菌:MIC900.008mg/L;敏感性100%)。头孢洛林对包括β-内酰胺酶阳性的流感嗜血杆菌具有较高的活性(MIC900.06mg/L;敏感性为100%/85.7%)。头孢洛林对不产生ESBL的GNB表现出高活性(E.大肠杆菌:MIC900.5mg/L,敏感性91.9%;肺炎克雷伯菌:MIC900.25mg/L,敏感性95.1%;氧化钾,MIC900.5mg/L;敏感性95.7%)。
    结论:头孢洛林对最近在LATAM中通常引起SSTI和RTIs的细菌病原体具有活性。对抗生素耐药性模式的本地和区域监测对于了解不断发展的耐药性和指导治疗管理至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Ceftaroline, a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, has activity against Gram-positive and several Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline and comparators against isolates causing skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and respiratory tract infections (RTIs) collected in Latin America (LATAM) in 2016-2020 as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance program (ATLAS).
    METHODS: Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using both Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria.
    RESULTS: Ceftaroline demonstrated potent activity against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (CLSI/EUCAST: MIC90 0.25 mg/L; susceptibility 100%), whereas activity against methicillin-resistant S. aureus varied for SSTIs (MIC90 1 mg/L; susceptibility 92.5%) and RTIs isolates (MIC90 2 mg/L; susceptibility 72.9%) isolates. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, particularly penicillin-resistant isolates commonly causing respiratory infections, high ceftaroline activity (MIC90 0.25 mg/L; susceptibility 100%/98.4%) was noted. All isolates of β-hemolytic streptococci were susceptible to ceftaroline (S. agalactiae: MIC90 0.03 mg/L [SSTIs]; MIC90 0.015 mg/L (RTIs); susceptibility 100%; S. pyogenes: MIC90 0.008 mg/L; susceptibility 100%). Ceftaroline was highly active against Haemophilus influenzae, including β-lactamase positive isolates (MIC90 0.06 mg/L; susceptibility 100%/85.7%). Ceftaroline demonstrated high activity against non-ESBL-producing GNB (E. coli: MIC90 0.5 mg/L, susceptibility 91.9%; K. pneumoniae: MIC90 0.25 mg/L, susceptibility 95.1%; K. oxytoca, MIC90 0.5 mg/L; susceptibility 95.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline was active against the recent collection of bacterial pathogens commonly causing SSTIs and RTIs in LATAM. Local and regional surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns are crucial to understand evolving resistance and guide treatment management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管反复清创术和长期的全身性抗生素治疗,非结核分枝杆菌治疗皮肤和软组织感染有时会失败。这些治疗难治性感染可引起显著的发病率并构成治疗挑战。手术后,我们用局部抗生素滴注和停留时间的负压伤口疗法治疗了三名患者,除了全身抗生素治疗。治疗成功且耐受性良好,除了一些局部刺激。
    Treatment of skin and soft tissue infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria sometimes fails despite repeated debridements and long-term systemic antibiotic therapy. These treatment-refractory infections can cause significant morbidity and pose a treatment challenge. Following surgery, we treated three patients with negative pressure wound therapy with the instillation and dwell time of topical antibiotics, in addition to systemic antibiotic treatment. Treatment was successful and well tolerated, except for some local irritation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:注射药物的人有急性感染的风险,如皮肤和软组织感染,感染性心内膜炎,骨和关节感染和血流感染。在过去10年中,在国际上注射毒品的人中这些感染有所增加。然而,关于澳大利亚急性感染的当地数据尚未得到很好的描述.
    方法:我们回顾了澳大利亚注射毒品人群中急性感染的流行病学及相关发病率和死亡率。我们总结了这些感染的危险因素,包括同时影响健康的社会和心理决定因素。
    结果:在过去的18年中,澳大利亚报告在过去12个月内注射过药物的比例有所下降。然而,该人群的急性感染负担有所增加。这种增加主要由皮肤和软组织感染驱动。注射毒品的人通常有多个相互冲突的优先事项,这可能会延迟参与护理。
    结论:注射药物者的急性感染与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。急性感染导致大量的卧床天数,澳大利亚的手术要求和医疗费用。这些感染的增加可能是由于微生物的复杂相互作用,个人,社会和环境因素。
    结论:在澳大利亚注射药物者的急性感染对患者和卫生保健系统都是一个巨大的负担。灵活的医疗保健模式,例如低阈值伤口诊所,会有助于直接瞄准,并解决早期干预问题,这些感染。
    OBJECTIVE: People who inject drugs are at risk of acute infections, such as skin and soft tissue infections, infective endocarditis, bone and joint infections and bloodstream infections. There has been an increase in these infections in people who inject drugs internationally over the past 10 years. However, the local data regarding acute infections in Australia has not been well described.
    METHODS: We review the epidemiology of acute infections and associated morbidity and mortality amongst people who inject drugs in Australia. We summarise risk factors for these infections, including the concurrent social and psychological determinants of health.
    RESULTS: The proportion of people who report having injected drugs in the prior 12 months in Australia has decreased over the past 18 years. However, there has been an increase in the burden of acute infections in this population. This increase is driven largely by skin and soft tissue infections. People who inject drugs often have multiple conflicting priorities that can delay engagement in care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Acute infections in people who inject drugs are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Acute infections contribute to significant bed days, surgical requirements and health-care costs in Australia. The increase in these infections is likely due to a complex interplay of microbiological, individual, social and environmental factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Acute infections in people who inject drugs in Australia represent a significant burden to both patients and health-care systems. Flexible health-care models, such as low-threshold wound clinics, would help directly target, and address early interventions, for these infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号