midazolam

咪达唑仑
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    酶诱导剂的作用的剂量依赖性和通过相同的诱导途径(孕烷X受体)发挥其作用的两种诱导剂的联合给药的作用尚未得到很好的研究。使用口服咪达唑仑微剂量(30μg),我们已经研究了CYP3A4诱导的圣约翰草(SJW)在11名健康志愿者使用低(300毫克/天,含7.48毫克高富素),治疗性(900毫克/天),和SJW的超治疗剂量(1800毫克/天)14天。然后将SJW与利福平(600mg/天)共同施用另外7天,以评价两种诱导剂的组合施用的效果。此外,在SJW之前静脉注射咪达唑仑微剂量(10μg),在SJW1800毫克/天,以及在施用两种诱导剂期间评估肝脏对总诱导的贡献(半同时施用)。服用SJW使口服咪达唑仑清除率增加1.96倍(300mg/天),3.86倍(900毫克/天),和5.62倍(1800毫克/天),加入利福平后的17.5倍。同时,静脉注射咪达唑仑的清除率分别增加2.05倍(1800mg/天)和2.93倍(SJW+利福平).这些结果表明,利福平在肝和整体上均显着增强了最高SJW剂量的诱导,并表明这些代谢作用主要发生在肠道中。这些发现还表明,在涉及强和中等酶诱导剂的药物相互作用中,强诱导剂的加害者效应对相互作用是决定性的。
    The dose dependence of the effect of enzyme inducers and the effect of the combined administration of two inducers that exert their effect via the same induction pathway (pregnane X receptor) have not been well studied. Using oral midazolam microdoses (30 μg), we have investigated CYP3A4 induction by St. John\'s wort (SJW) in 11 healthy volunteers using low (300 mg/day containing 7.48 mg hyperforin), therapeutic (900 mg/day), and supratherapeutic doses of SJW (1800 mg/day) for 14 days. SJW was then co-administered with rifampin (600 mg/day) for a further 7 days to evaluate the effect of the combined administration of two inducers. In addition, intravenous midazolam microdoses (10 μg) were administered before SJW, at SJW 1800 mg/day, and during administration of the two inducers to assess the hepatic contribution to total induction (semi-simultaneous administration). Administration of SJW increased oral midazolam clearance 1.96-fold (300 mg/day), 3.86-fold (900 mg/day), and 5.62-fold (1800 mg/day), and 17.5-fold after the addition of rifampin. Concurrently, the clearance of intravenous midazolam increased 2.05-fold (1800 mg/day) and 2.93-fold (SJW + rifampin). These results show that rifampin significantly enhances the induction of the highest SJW doses both hepatically and overall and suggest that these metabolic effects occur predominantly in the gut. These findings also suggest that in drug interactions involving strong and moderate enzyme inducers, the perpetrator effects of the strong inducer are decisive for the interaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一个潜在的,随机化,进行盲法实验以比较鼻内(IN)右美托咪定(Dex,10µg/kg;n=12)单独或与咪达唑仑联合使用(DexM,0.3mg/kg;n=12)或氯胺酮(DexK,2mg/kg;n=12)健康犬。易于管理(EA1),总给药时间(TAT),第一次(TA1)和第二次鼻孔给药(TA2)的时间,记录雾化过程中的不良事件。两天后,通过注射水的IN雾化作为额外的结果变量来评估EA2。评估了镇静的开始,以及从T0(基线)到T120的行为评分和生理参数。统计分析包括卡方,单向方差分析或Kruskal-Wallis,重复测量或弗里德曼的方差分析,和Wilcoxon的测试.显著性为p≤0.05。Dex的镇静开始为12.9±4.1、18.2±7.5和9.9±4.3分钟(平均值±SD),DexM,还有Dexk,分别。与DexM相比,DexK的发病时间较短(p=0.002),解释T15时DexM的较低行为得分。Dex和DexK的所有狗都达到了足够的镇静,在T30出现峰值镇静,而DexM中的一些狗从未达到足够的镇静,该组在T45达到峰值。在DexM和DexK中,诸如唾液流口水和鼻子上的爪子等不良事件明显更高,解释他们在TA2、TAT、和EA1与Dex相比。与DexM和DexK相比,Dex中的EA2也更高。总之,Dex在狗中的耐受性更好,DexK显示出更快,更深刻的镇静作用。由于矛盾的兴奋,不可预测的镇静,和鼻腔刺激,不建议使用DexM。
    A prospective, randomized, blinded experiment was conducted to compare the effects of intranasal (IN) dexmedetomidine (Dex, 10µg/kg; n=12) alone or combined with midazolam (DexM, 0.3mg/kg; n=12) or ketamine (DexK, 2mg/kg; n=12) in healthy dogs. Ease of administration (EA1), total administration time (TAT), time for first (TA1) and second nostril administration (TA2), and adverse events during atomization were recorded. Two days later, EA2 was assessed by IN atomization of injectable water as an additional outcome variable. Onset of sedation was evaluated, along with behavioral scores and physiological parameters from T0 (baseline) to T120. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis, repeated measures or Friedman\'s ANOVA, and Wilcoxon\'s tests. Significance was p≤0.05. Onset of sedation was 12.9 ± 4.1, 18.2 ± 7.5, and 9.9 ± 4.3mins (mean ± SD) for Dex, DexM, and DexK, respectively. Onset was shorter in DexK compared to DexM (p=0.002), explaining the lower behavioral scores in DexM at T15. All dogs in Dex and DexK reached adequate sedation, with peak sedation occurring at T30, while some dogs in DexM never reached adequate sedation and this group peaked at T45. Adverse events such as saliva drooling and pawing at the nose were significantly higher in DexM and DexK, explaining their differences in TA2, TAT, and EA1 comparing to Dex. EA2 was also higher in Dex compared to DexM and DexK. In conclusion, Dex was better tolerated in dogs and DexK showed faster and more profound sedative effects. Due to paradoxical excitement, unpredictable sedation, and nasal irritation, DexM is not recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    焦虑和抑郁可以通过脑-肠轴影响胃肠道的生理,导致胃肠功能紊乱,主要表现为消化不良,腹泻,便秘,或腹痛。由于与父母分离,儿童会出现术前焦虑,害怕陌生的环境和麻醉和外科手术。探讨缓解术前焦虑对小儿腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术后胃肠功能恢复的影响。
    90例腹腔镜下腹股沟斜疝疝囊高位结扎术患儿随机分为对照组(C组)和实验组(M组)。M组给予咪达唑仑口服溶液0.5mg/kg(最大剂量20mg),C组给予相同剂量的5%葡萄糖溶液。主要结果是术后首次排便时间和I-FEED评分。次要结果包括mYPAS-SF评分;儿童镇静评分;儿童-父母分离评分;父母STAI评分;PHBQ评分;FLACC评分,手术时间,流体输入和外科医生工作满意度。
    与C组相比,术后首次排便时间较短(P<0.05),术后第1天I-FEED评分较低(P<0.05)。mYPAS-SF分数,M组在T1、T2和T3时差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),S1时的父母STAI评分、T1时的儿童镇静评分和儿童-父母分离评分以及外科医生工作满意度两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。第2天和第3天的I-FEED评分、PHBQ评分、FLACC分数,手术时间,两组患儿的液体输入量比较(P>0.05)。
    术前应用咪达唑仑口服液缓解术前焦虑,有助于促进腹股沟斜疝患儿术后胃肠功能恢复,提高外科医生工作满意度。
    UNASSIGNED: Anxiety and depression can affect the physiology of the gastrointestinal tract through the brain-gut axis, causing gastrointestinal dysfunction, which is mainly manifested as indigestion, diarrhoea, constipation, or abdominal pain. Preoperative anxiety arises in children due to separation from parents, fear of unfamiliar surroundings and anaesthesia and surgical procedures.To discuss the effect of alleviating preoperative anxiety on postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function in children with indirect inguinal hernia after laparoscopic high ligation of the hernia sac.
    UNASSIGNED: 90 children with laparoscopic high ligation of the herniated sac in oblique inguinal hernia were randomly divided into control group (Group C) and experimental group (Group M). The Group M was given midazolam oral solution 0.5mg/kg (maximum dose 20mg), and The Group C was given 5% glucose solution with the same dose.Primary outcome was the time to first postoperative defecation and I-FEED scores.The secondary outcomes included mYPAS-SF scores; child sedation scores; child-parent separation scores; parental STAI scores;PHBQ scores;FLACC scores, operative time, and fluid input and surgeon job satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared with Group C, there was a shorter time to first postoperative defecation (P < 0.05), and lower I-FEED scores on postoperative day 1 (P < 0.05). The mYPAS-SF scores, which were significantly different in Group M at T1, T2, and T3 (P < 0.05), parental STAI scores at S1, child sedation scores and child-parent separation scores in T1, and surgeon job satisfaction between the two groups were significantly different (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in I-FEED scores on days 2 and 3, PHBQ scores, FLACC scores, operative time, and fluid input between the two groups of children (P > 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Preoperative application of midazolam oral solution to relieve preoperative anxiety helps to promote the recovery of postoperative gastrointestinal function in children with indirect inguinal hernia and increases the surgeon job satisfaction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生儿和小婴儿在诊断过程中无法积极合作;因此,镇静通常是员工保持固定和获得高质量的图像。然而,这些程序通常在生病时显示,脆弱的,或血流动力学不稳定的新生儿和幼儿,这增加了镇静的相关风险。这项研究总结了我们在该脆弱人群中安全有效的程序性镇静的4年经验。
    这项回顾性研究分析了从2019年12月至2023年11月接受非疼痛诊断程序的新生儿和幼儿的数据。将患者分为新生儿(年龄≤28天)和年轻婴儿(29天≤年龄≤90天)组。
    非药物策略,包括自然睡觉,包裹/便利的塞住,非营养性吸吮,和皮肤对皮肤的护理,镇静成功率约为98.4%。就药理学方法而言,我们的机构主要利用水合氯醛对接受非疼痛诊断程序的新生儿和年轻婴儿进行程序性镇静.咪达唑仑作为一种替代镇静剂。仅水合氯醛在第一次尝试时显示出92.5%的成功率,与单独的咪达唑仑相比,成功率为85.11%。新生儿在镇静过程中的不良事件发生率高于幼儿。
    本研究回顾了我们在新生儿和小婴儿中进行手术镇静的4年经验。水合氯醛在该人群中表现出高度的安全性和有效性。然而,需要熟练医务人员的监督和长期观察。在我们的机构里,使用咪达唑仑的经验在这个人群中是有限的,需要进一步研究以确定其安全性和有效性。非药物策略可以达到可接受的镇静成功率,可以根据患者的耐受性使用。
    UNASSIGNED: Newborns and small infants are unable to cooperate actively during diagnostic procedures; therefore, sedation is often employee to maintain immobilization and obtain high-quality images. However, these procedures are often indicated in sick, vulnerable, or hemodynamically unstable neonates and young infants, which raises the associated risks of sedation. This study summarizes our 4-year of experience with safe and effective procedural sedation in this vulnerable population.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study analyzed data on neonates and young infants who underwent non-painful diagnostic procedures from December 2019 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into the neonate (aged≦ 28 days) and the young infant (29 days ≦ aged ≦ 90 days) groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Non-pharmacological strategies, including sleeping naturally, swaddling/facilitated tucking, non-nutritive sucking, and skin-to-skin care, can achieve a success rate for sedation about 98.4%. In terms of pharmacological methods, our institution primarily utilizes chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in neonates and young infants undergoing non-painful diagnostic procedures. Midazolam serves as an alternative sedative. Chloral hydrate alone demonstrated a 92.5% success rate on the first attempt, compared to midazolam alone, with an 85.11% success rate. Neonates experienced a higher incidence of adverse events during sedation compared to young infants.
    UNASSIGNED: This study reviews our 4-year experience with procedural sedation in neonates and young infants. Chloral hydrate demonstrated a high degree of safety and efficacy in this population. However, supervision by skilled medical personnel and extended observation is required. In our institution, the experience with midazolam is limited in this population, and further research is warranted to establish its safety and efficacy. Non-pharmacological strategies can achieve an acceptable rate of sedation success, which can be used based on patient\'s tolerance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在重症监护病房(ICU)的术后患者中,不仅需要镇痛药,还需要镇静,以便患者在治疗期间保持镇静,尤其是机械通气患者。通过使用量子意识指数(qCON)和量子有害指数(qNOX)的测量参数来测量镇痛药的镇静深度和充足性,使用亚剂量氯胺酮代替芬太尼和咪达唑仑作为镇静剂,镇痛剂可以作为一种新的替代方法,以获得更客观的结果。这项研究旨在通过在RSUPHajiAdamMalikMedan中施用亚剂量氯胺酮与芬太尼和咪达唑仑的组合来比较术后患者的qCON和qNOX的结果。
    这项研究采用了双盲方法的随机临床试验。总共收集了44个实验样本,并在满足纳入标准后随机分为两组。A组给予氯胺酮亚剂量,而B组给予芬太尼和咪达唑仑的混合物。使用统计产品和科学服务(SPSS)对获得的研究数据进行了测试。
    中位数存在差异,minimum,以及给予亚剂量氯胺酮、芬太尼和咪达唑仑的组的qCON和qNOX的最大值,但在T0、T1和T2时均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    给予亚剂量氯胺酮可提供与芬太尼和咪达唑仑相当的镇静和镇痛作用。
    MashartoAR,卢比斯美联社,BangunCG,Wahyunias.术后ICU患者氯胺酮亚剂量给药与芬太尼和咪达唑仑相比的定量意识指数和定量中毒指数:前瞻性,观察性研究。印度J暴击护理中心2024;28(6):581-586。
    UNASSIGNED: In postoperative patients in the intensive care units (ICUs), not only analgesics are needed but also sedation so that the patient can remain calm during treatment, especially patients with mechanical ventilation. By using the measurement parameters of the quantum consciousness index (qCON) and quantum noxious index (qNOX) in measuring the depth of sedation and adequacy of analgesics, the use of subdose ketamine instead of fentanyl and midazolam as sedative, analgesic agents can be performed as a new alternative to nociceptive monitoring methods with more objective results. This study aims to obtain results of comparing qCON and qNOX in postoperative patients by administering subdose ketamine compared with a combination of fentanyl and midazolam in RSUP Haji Adam Malik Medan.
    UNASSIGNED: A randomized clinical trial with a double-blind approach has been used in this study. A total of 44 experimental samples were gathered and randomly split into two groups after meeting the criteria for inclusion. Group A administered a ketamine subdose, whereas Group B administered a mixture of fentanyl and midazolam. The research data obtained were tested using Statistical Product and Science Service (SPSS).
    UNASSIGNED: There were differences in the median, minimum, and maximum values of qCON and qNOX in the groups given subdose ketamine and fentanyl and midazolam, but these were not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at T0, T1, and T2.
    UNASSIGNED: Administering a subdose of ketamine can provide sedation and analgesia comparable to fentanyl and midazolam.
    UNASSIGNED: Masharto AR, Lubis AP, Bangun CG, Wahyuni AS. Quantium Consciousness Index and Quantium Noxious Index in Ketamine Subdose Administration Compared with Fentanyl and Midazolam in Postoperative ICU Patients: A Prospective, Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):581-586.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非癫痫患者癫痫持续状态(SE)的触发因素可能差异很大,从特发性原因到接触化学惊厥药。不管它的病因是什么,长时间的SE会导致严重的脑损伤,通常导致癫痫的发展,这往往伴随着焦虑的增加。GABAA受体(GABAAR)介导的抑制在脑损伤和随后的癫痫和焦虑的潜在机制中具有核心作用。在SE期间,钙内流主要通过离子型谷氨酸受体激活信号级联,触发突触GABAAR的快速内化;这减弱抑制,加重癫痫发作和兴奋性毒性。GABA能中间神经元比主要神经元更容易发生兴奋性毒性死亡。在癫痫发生的潜伏期,在受损脑区神经元间丢失后突触相互作用的异常重组,导致过度兴奋的形成,引起尿源性神经元回路的癫痫发作,伴随着大脑振荡节律的紊乱。在自发的减少,基底外侧杏仁核神经元中IPSC的节律性“爆发”可能在焦虑发生中起重要作用。在SE期间保护中间神经元是预防癫痫和焦虑的关键。抗谷氨酸治疗,包括钙通透性AMPA受体的拮抗作用,不仅可以通过直接抑制兴奋来控制癫痫发作和减少兴奋性毒性,而且还通过抵消突触GABAAR的内化。苯二氮卓类药物,作为SE的延迟治疗,由于其靶标(突触GABAAR)的减少和分散,但也因为它们本身有助于进一步减少突触处可用的GABAAR;此外,苯二氮卓类药物在未成熟的大脑中可能完全无效。
    The triggers of status epilepticus (SE) in non-epileptic patients can vary widely, from idiopathic causes to exposure to chemoconvulsants. Regardless of its etiology, prolonged SE can cause significant brain damage, commonly resulting in the development of epilepsy, which is often accompanied by increased anxiety. GABAA receptor (GABAAR)-mediated inhibition has a central role among the mechanisms underlying brain damage and the ensuing epilepsy and anxiety. During SE, calcium influx primarily via ionotropic glutamate receptors activates signaling cascades which trigger a rapid internalization of synaptic GABAARs; this weakens inhibition, exacerbating seizures and excitotoxicity. GABAergic interneurons are more susceptible to excitotoxic death than principal neurons. During the latent period of epileptogenesis, the aberrant reorganization in synaptic interactions that follow interneuronal loss in injured brain regions, leads to the formation of hyperexcitable, seizurogenic neuronal circuits, along with disturbances in brain oscillatory rhythms. Reduction in the spontaneous, rhythmic \"bursts\" of IPSCs in basolateral amygdala neurons is likely to play a central role in anxiogenesis. Protecting interneurons during SE is key to preventing both epilepsy and anxiety. Antiglutamatergic treatments, including antagonism of calcium-permeable AMPA receptors, can be expected to control seizures and reduce excitotoxicity not only by directly suppressing hyperexcitation, but also by counteracting the internalization of synaptic GABAARs. Benzodiazepines, as delayed treatment of SE, have low efficacy due to the reduction and dispersion of their targets (the synaptic GABAARs), but also because themselves contribute to further reduction of available GABAARs at the synapse; furthermore, benzodiazepines may be completely ineffective in the immature brain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿科患者术前焦虑的管理,以及它的含义,对麻醉师来说仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们比较了鼻腔右美托咪定的安全性和有效性,咪达唑仑,氯胺酮作为儿童手术前用药。
    这项双盲随机临床试验于2014年1月在两家三级医院进行,对象是90名2-7岁的儿童。参与者\'美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)的身体状况是I或II,他们被安排进行选择性单侧腹股沟疝修补术。使用块随机化方法,患者被随机分为三组,每个人鼻内接受右美托咪定(2µg/Kg),咪达唑仑(0.2mg/Kg),麻醉诱导前60分钟和氯胺酮(8mg/Kg)。给药前进行焦虑、镇静状态评估,然后在接下来的50分钟内每10分钟一次。父母分离焦虑,面罩验收,术后躁动,疼痛,恶心,并记录和比较这些组之间的呕吐。所有统计分析均使用SPSS软件(21.0版)进行。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    氯胺酮显示给药后10、20和30分钟的镇静作用最强(分别为P<0.001,P=0.03,P=0.01)。然而,右美托咪定在40和50min后比其他药物更有效(P<0.001).其他变量无统计学意义差异。
    在紧急情况下,鼻内氯胺酮,用最短的时间行动,可以管理。鼻内右美托咪定,它被认为是这项研究中最有效的药物,可以在择期儿科手术前40-50分钟给药。试验注册号:IRCT2013081614372N1。
    UNASSIGNED: The management of preoperative anxiety in pediatric patients, as well as its implications, has remained challenging for anesthesiologists. In this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and ketamine as surgical premedication in children.
    UNASSIGNED: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial was conducted at two tertiary hospitals in January 2014, on 90 children aged between 2-7 years old. The participants\' American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status was I or II, and they were scheduled for elective unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Using the block randomization method, the patients were randomly assigned to three groups, each receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine (2 µg/Kg), midazolam (0.2 mg/Kg), and ketamine (8 mg/Kg) 60 min before induction of anesthesia. Anxiety and sedation state were evaluated before drug administration, and then every 10 min for the next 50 min. Parental separation anxiety, mask acceptance, postoperative agitation, pain, nausea, and vomiting were also recorded and compared between these groups. All the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Ketamine indicated the strongest sedative effect 10, 20, and 30 min after administration of premedication (P<0.001, P=0.03, P=0.01, respectively). However, dexmedetomidine was more effective than other drugs after 40 and 50 min (P<0.001). Other variables indicated no statistically significant difference.
    UNASSIGNED: In case of emergencies, intranasal ketamine, with the shortest time of action, could be administered. Intranasal dexmedetomidine, which was revealed to be the most potent drug in this study, could be administrated 40-50 min before elective pediatric surgeries.Trial registration number: IRCT2013081614372N1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景丙泊酚和咪达唑仑是在关键环境中使用的最常见的镇静剂。丙泊酚和咪达唑仑镇静后可能有不同的死亡率。一些研究提到,在机械通气患者中,异丙酚的死亡率低于咪达唑仑,但是其他研究的结果相互矛盾。这项研究旨在比较在国民警卫队医院卫生事务(NGHA)-西部地区(WR)接受机械通气的患者中丙泊酚与咪达唑仑的28天死亡率。方法对2016年3月至2022年7月(NGHA-WR)进行回顾性图表回顾。纳入标准是那些入院ICU的18岁或以上的机械通气患者,给予异丙酚或咪达唑仑作为初始镇静剂。那些签署DNR(不要复苏)或禁忌镇静的人,比如过敏,被排除在研究之外。数据是回顾性检索的,并从医院信息系统(HIS-BestCare,沙特-韩国健康信息学公司,利雅得,沙特阿拉伯)和数据情报办公室。结果镇静类型与28天死亡率之间存在显着差异。咪达唑仑的死亡率较高-104(47.93%),与异丙酚-3(14.29%)相比。此外,与异丙酚相比,使用咪达唑仑的患者ICU住院时间更长,平均为19.23天vs7.55天,分别。结论丙泊酚或咪达唑仑作为机械通气≥24小时的初始镇静剂患者的28天死亡率存在显着差异。此外,与咪达唑仑相比,丙泊酚的使用与插管或ICU住院天数减少相关.
    Background Propofol and midazolam are the most common sedative agents used in critical settings. Propofol and midazolam might have different mortality rates after sedation administration. Some studies mention that propofol is associated with a lower mortality rate than midazolam in mechanically ventilated patients, but other studies have contradicting results. This study aims to compare the 28-day mortality of propofol versus midazolam for patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the National Guard Hospital Health Affairs (NGHA)-Western Region (WR). Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted at (NGHA-WR) from March 2016 to July 2022. The inclusion criteria were those mechanically ventilated patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to ICU, where they were given either propofol or midazolam as the initial sedative agent. Those who signed DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or were contraindicated to sedation, such as allergy, were excluded from the study. Data were retrospectively retrieved and obtained from the Hospital Information System (HIS-BestCare, Saudi-Korean Health Informatics Company, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) and the Office of Data Intelligence. Results There is a significant difference between the type of sedation and the 28-day mortality rate. Midazolam was associated with higher rates of mortality - 104 (47.93%) when compared to propofol - three (14.29%). Also, patients who used midazolam had longer durations of ICU stay compared to propofol, with a mean number of 19.23 days vs 7.55 days, respectively. Conclusion There is a significant difference regarding the 28-day mortality between patients who were given propofol or midazolam as an initial sedative agent for mechanical ventilation ≥ 24 hours. Moreover, the use of propofol is associated with fewer days of being intubated or being in ICU when compared to midazolam.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:针对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的初级医疗保健和常规次要程序的管理可能具有挑战性;因此,当行为策略失败时,经常使用镇静药物。我们评估了当前治疗ASD儿童的药物策略的有效性。
    方法:我们对ASD患儿目前的程序性镇静方法进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。
    结果:20项研究符合纳入标准。右美托咪定,咪达唑仑,异丙酚和水合氯醛是成功手术的最有效药物,而异丙酚的不良事件最多。最常用的药物是右美托咪定和咪达唑仑或两者的组合,右美托咪定联合咪达唑仑的疗效优于单用右美托咪定.
    结论:ASD患儿存在多种有效的程序性镇静药物方案。这些结果可以支持制定ASD儿童程序性镇静的具体指南。
    OBJECTIVE: Management of primary healthcare and routine minor procedures for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be challenging; therefore, when behavioural strategies fail, sedative medications are often employed. We evaluated the effectiveness of the current pharmacological strategies for managing children with ASD.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current approaches for procedural sedation in children with ASD.
    RESULTS: Twenty studies met inclusion criteria. Dexmedetomidine, midazolam, propofol and chloral hydrate were the most efficient agents for successful procedures, while propofol had the highest number of adverse events. The most frequently used agents were dexmedetomidine and midazolam or a combination of the two, and the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine plus midazolam was superior to dexmedetomidine alone.
    CONCLUSIONS: Multiple effective drug regimens exist for procedural sedation in children with ASD. These results could support the development of specific guidelines for procedural sedation in children with ASD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号