midazolam

咪达唑仑
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    咪达唑仑的静脉内(IV)给药可导致癫痫样活动或运动。本报告描述了5例静脉注射咪达唑仑后出现癫痫样运动的新生儿。这些患者在2019年至2022年之间出现,并被送往位于马斯喀特学术中心内的新生儿重症监护病房。阿曼。静脉注射咪达唑仑后不久发生异常运动。接受咪达唑仑输注后,没有患者出现癫痫样运动。癫痫样运动是自发或通过抗癫痫药物中止的。此外,任何婴儿在治疗后期均未观察到癫痫复发.由于这种不良反应可能与推注给药的速度有关,静脉注射咪达唑仑必须在2-3分钟内缓慢推注,然后缓慢冲洗生理盐水。为了防止咪达唑仑对新生儿的潜在不良影响,新生儿看护者必须意识到这一点。
    An intravenous (IV) administration of midazolam may result in seizure-like activity or movement. This report describes 5 neonates who developed seizure-like movements after IV midazolam injection. The patients presented between 2019 and 2022 and were admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit located within an academic centre in Muscat, Oman. The abnormal movements occurred shortly after IV bolus administration of midazolam. None of the patients experienced seizure-like movements after receiving midazolam infusions. The seizure-like movements were aborted either spontaneously or by antiseizure medications. In addition, seizure recurrence was not observed in any of the infants during the later stages of their treatment. Since this adverse effect might be related to the speed of the bolus administration, IV midazolam must be given as a slow bolus over 2-3 minutes followed by a slow flush of normal saline. To prevent midazolam\'s potential adverse effect on newborns, neonatal caregivers must be aware of it.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌是全球癌症死亡的主要原因。它可能表现为支气管内肿块患者的气道阻塞。支气管内近距离放射治疗(EBBT)已被证明可以提供姑息性治疗。它是在肿块附近插入放射性物质以减小肿瘤大小,从而改善气道阻塞。这是我们机构在COVID-19大流行期间进行的第一例EBBT病例。一个53岁的男性,60kg,ASA高血压的身体状态2,吸烟者,恶性肿瘤,和以前的肺结核患者,出现咳嗽和呼吸困难.在计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描中看到几乎阻塞右主支气管的支气管内肿块。他被诊断为肺鳞状细胞癌,并接受了放疗和厄洛替尼化疗。重复CT扫描时,没有注意到质量大小的减少。EBBT被建议,并为计划的程序成立了一个多学科小组。肺科,放射肿瘤学,麻醉小组被确认,并且在实际程序之前进行了彻底的计划。使用咪达唑仑在镇静下完成了三个部分的EBBT,芬太尼,和右美托咪定输注。在镇静之前,利多卡因喷雾剂和经气管阻滞也作为辅助手段。程序按计划进行,并讨论了后续馏分的改进点。由于导管持续咳嗽和不适,额外的异丙托溴铵雾化减少分泌物,并纳入口服右美沙芬抑制咳嗽。在每个分数之后,术后对患者进行放疗和麻醉技术的副作用监测.在随后的级分中注意到质量大小的定性减少。患者能够完成3个部分,并建议在一个月后进行随访。EBBT是肺癌的一种新兴的姑息治疗方式,尤其是腔内肿块。麻醉考虑将取决于每个病例的特征,如气道解剖,患者的舒适度和能力,和程序要求。清醒镇静和局部麻醉是一种适当的麻醉选择,特别是在严重的气道阻塞可能损害通气的情况下,如果气道反射减弱。具有不同服务和利益相关者的多学科方法对于适当规划很重要,执行,以及对此类患者的管理。
    Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. It may present as airway obstruction in a patient with endobronchial masses. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) has been shown to provide palliative therapy. It is the insertion of a radioactive material near the mass to reduce tumor size, thereby improving airway obstruction. This is the first case of EBBT done in our institution during the COVID-19 pandemic. A 53-year-old male, 60 kg, ASA Physical Status 2 for hypertension, smoker, malignancy, and previous pulmonary tuberculosis patient, presented with a cough and dyspnea. An endobronchial mass almost obstructing the right mainstem bronchus was seen on a computed tomography (CT) scan. He was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung and underwent radiotherapy and erlotinib chemotherapy. On repeat CT scan, there was no noted decrease in the size of the mass. EBBT was suggested, and a multi-disciplinary team was formed for the planned procedure. Pulmonology, radiation oncology, and anesthesiology teams were identified, and thorough planning was done prior to the actual procedure. Three fractions of EBBT were done under sedation using midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine infusion. Lidocaine spray and transtracheal block were also performed as adjuncts prior to sedation. The procedure went as planned, and points for improvement were discussed for subsequent fractions. Due to persistent cough and discomfort from the catheter, additional ipratropium nebulization for minimization of secretions, and oral dextromethorphan for cough suppression were incorporated. After each fraction, the patient was monitored post-procedure for any side effects both from the radiotherapy and anesthetic technique. Qualitative reduction in mass size was noted in subsequent fractions. The patient was able to complete 3 fractions and was advised to follow-up after a month. EBBT is an emerging palliative and treatment modality for lung cancer, especially for intraluminal masses. Anesthetic considerations will depend on each case\'s characteristics such as airway anatomy, patient comfort and capacity, and procedural requirements. Conscious sedation with topical anesthesia is an adequate and appropriate anesthetic option, especially in cases where severe airway obstruction may compromise ventilation if airway reflexes are blunted. A multidisciplinary approach with different services and stakeholders is important for the proper planning, execution, and management of such patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在I/IIMajesTEC-1期研究中,细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)与teclistamab治疗有关。细胞因子,特别是白细胞介素(IL)-6是已知的细胞色素P450(CYP)酶活性抑制剂。基于生理学的药代动力学模型评估了IL-6血清水平对各种CYP酶(1A2、2C9、2C19、3A4、3A5)的底物暴露的影响。评估了两个IL-6动力学曲线,在MajesTEC-1中接受推荐的II期剂量替列他单抗的患者中,具有最大IL-6浓度(Cmax)(21pg/mL)的平均IL-6谱和具有最高IL-6Cmax(288pg/mL)的患者的IL-6谱.对于平均IL-6动力学曲线,预计teclistamab会导致CYP底物暴露的有限变化(曲线下面积[AUC]平均比0.87-1.20)。对于最大的IL-6动力学曲线,对奥美拉唑的影响,辛伐他汀,咪达唑仑,环孢素暴露弱至中度(平均AUC比1.90-2.23),咖啡因和s-华法林最低(平均AUC比0.82-1.25)。这些底物的最大暴露变化发生在第1周期的逐步给药后3-4天。这些结果表明,在第1周期后,来自IL-6效应的药物相互作用对CYP活性没有有意义的影响,对CYP底物的影响最小或中等。预期药物相互作用的最高风险发生在第一治疗剂量(1.5mg/kg皮下)后7天的逐步给药期间以及CRS期间和之后。
    Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was associated with teclistamab treatment in the phase I/II MajesTEC-1 study. Cytokines, especially interleukin (IL)-6, are known suppressors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes\' activity. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model evaluated the impact of IL-6 serum levels on exposure of substrates of various CYP enzymes (1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 3A4, 3A5). Two IL-6 kinetics profiles were assessed, the mean IL-6 profile with a maximum concentration (Cmax) of IL-6 (21 pg/mL) and the IL-6 profile of the patient presenting the highest IL-6 Cmax (288 pg/mL) among patients receiving the recommended phase II dose of teclistamab in MajesTEC-1. For the mean IL-6 kinetics profile, teclistamab was predicted to result in a limited change in exposure of CYP substrates (area under the curve [AUC] mean ratio 0.87-1.20). For the maximum IL-6 kinetics profile, the impact on omeprazole, simvastatin, midazolam, and cyclosporine exposure was weak to moderate (mean AUC ratios 1.90-2.23), and minimal for caffeine and s-warfarin (mean AUC ratios 0.82-1.25). Maximum change in exposure for these substrates occurred 3-4 days after step-up dosing in cycle 1. These results suggest that after cycle 1, drug interaction from IL-6 effect has no meaningful impact on CYP activities, with minimal or moderate impact on CYP substrates. The highest risk of drug interaction is expected to occur during step-up dosing up to 7 days after the first treatment dose (1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously) and during and after CRS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    咪达唑仑,短效苯二氮卓类药物,广泛用于缓解患者的焦虑,加强合规性,并帮助麻醉。虽然其副作用通常是剂量依赖性的,并且可以通过警惕的围手术期监测来控制,严重的心肺并发症,包括死亡和永久性神经损伤,已被记录在案。长期接触苯二氮卓类药物,比如咪达唑仑,与婴儿的神经系统变化有关。尽管尝试使用治疗药物监测以获得最佳镇静剂量,其功效有限。因此,目前正在努力确定替代预测标志物,以指导个体化给药和减轻不良反应.了解这些因素对于确定咪达唑仑未来给药的适用性至关重要,特别是在严重的不良反应之后。本文旨在阐明影响咪达唑仑药代动力学和药效学的因素,可能导致不良事件。最后,我们提供了一个案例研究来举例说明对咪达唑仑相关不良事件的致病因素的复杂调查.
    Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, is widely used to alleviate patient anxiety, enhance compliance, and aid in anesthesia. While its side effects are typically dose-dependent and manageable with vigilant perioperative monitoring, serious cardiorespiratory complications, including fatalities and permanent neurological impairment, have been documented. Prolonged exposure to benzodiazepines, such as midazolam, has been associated with neurological changes in infants. Despite attempts to employ therapeutic drug monitoring for optimal sedation dosing, its efficacy has been limited. Consequently, efforts are underway to identify alternative predictive markers to guide individualized dosing and mitigate adverse effects. Understanding these factors is crucial for determining midazolam\'s suitability for future administration, particularly after a severe adverse reaction. This article aims to elucidate the factors influencing midazolam\'s pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, potentially leading to adverse events. Finally, a case study is presented to exemplify the complex investigation into the causative factors of midazolam-related adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝功能损害,由于肝硬化,降低细胞色素P450酶(CYPs)的活性。使用基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型来预测CYP底物的这种作用已经得到了完善。但肝硬化对尿苷-葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶(UGT)活性的影响研究较少,PBPK模型报道较少。UGT酶参与CYP3A羟基化后咪达唑仑的初级N-葡糖醛酸化和1'-OH-咪达唑仑的葡糖醛酸化。在这项研究中,Simcyp®用于建立咪达唑仑的PBPK模型,其主要代谢产物咪达唑仑-N-葡糖苷酸(UGT1A4)和1'-OH咪达唑仑(CYP3A4/3A5)和次级代谢产物1'-OH-咪达唑仑-O-葡糖苷酸(UGT2B7/2B4),允许模拟肝硬化对咪达唑仑的原发性和继发性葡萄糖醛酸化的影响。在外推到Child-Pugh(CP)A类肝硬化患者之前,在非肝硬化受试者中验证了该模型,B,和C.我们的模型成功地预测了咪达唑仑及其代谢物在非肝硬化和肝硬化患者中的暴露,86%的观察到的血浆浓度在预测的第5-95百分位数之内,并且观察到的AUCinf和Cmax的几何平均值在预测的0.7-1.43倍之内。模拟代谢率(AUC葡糖醛酸/AUCparent,MR),计算咪达唑仑-N-葡糖苷酸对咪达唑仑的影响(表明UGT1A4活性),并降低了40%(CPA),48%(CPB),和75%(CPC)。对于1'-OH-咪达唑仑-O-葡糖苷酸至1'-OH-咪达唑仑,MR(表明UGT2B7/2B4活性)下降了35%(CPA),51%(CPB),和64%(CPC)。观察到的数据证实了这些预测的MR。因此,这项工作增加了Simcyp®预测肝硬化对UGT1A4和UGT2B7/UGT2B4底物药代动力学影响的信心。意义陈述本文介绍了咪达唑仑及其代谢物的PBPK模型,并验证了使用Simcyp®肝功能损害人群模型时对药代动力学曲线的准确模拟。咪达唑仑-N-葡糖苷酸和1'-OH-咪达唑仑-O-葡糖苷酸的暴露变化反映了肝硬化患者UGT1A4和UGT2B7/2B4葡糖苷酸活性降低的影响。本研究中使用的方法可以扩展到验证受肝硬化影响的其他UGT酶的建模。
    Hepatic impairment, due to liver cirrhosis, decreases the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes (CYPs). The use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to predict this effect for CYP substrates has been well-established, but the effect of cirrhosis on uridine-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activities is less studied and few PBPK models have been reported. UGT enzymes are involved in primary N-glucuronidation of midazolam and glucuronidation of 1\'-OH-midazolam following CYP3A hydroxylation. In this study, Simcyp was used to establish PBPK models for midazolam, its primary metabolites midazolam-N-glucuronide (UGT1A4) and 1\'-OH midazolam (CYP3A4/3A5), and the secondary metabolite 1\'-OH-midazolam-O-glucuronide (UGT2B7/2B4), allowing to simulate the impact of liver cirrhosis on the primary and secondary glucuronidation of midazolam. The model was verified in noncirrhotic subjects before extrapolation to cirrhotic patients of Child-Pugh (CP) classes A, B, and C. Our model successfully predicted the exposures of midazolam and its metabolites in noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients, with 86% of observed plasma concentrations within 5th-95th percentiles of predictions and observed geometrical mean of area under the plasma concentration curve between 0 hours to infinity and maximal plasma concentration within 0.7- to 1.43-fold of predictions. The simulated metabolic ratio defined as the ratio of the glucuronide metabolite AUC over the parent compound AUC (AUCglucuronide/AUCparent, metabolic ratio [MR]), was calculated for midazolam-N-glucuronide to midazolam (indicative of UGT1A4 activity) and decreased by 40% (CP A), 48% (CP B), and 75% (CP C). For 1\'-OH-midazolam-O-glucuronide to 1\'-OH-midazolam, the MR (indicative of UGT2B7/2B4 activity) dropped by 35% (CP A), 51% (CP B), and 64% (CP C). These predicted MRs were corroborated by the observed data. This work thus increases confidence in Simcyp predictions of the effect of liver cirrhosis on the pharmacokinetics of UGT1A4 and UGT2B7/UGT2B4 substrates. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This article presents a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for midazolam and its metabolites and verifies the accurate simulation of pharmacokinetic profiles when using the Simcyp hepatic impairment population models. Exposure changes of midazolam-N-glucuronide and 1\'-OH-midazolam-O-glucuronide reflect the impact of decreases in UGT1A4 and UGT2B7/2B4 glucuronidation activity in cirrhotic patients. The approach used in this study may be extended to verify the modeling of other uridine glucuronosyltransferase enzymes affected by liver cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一个50多岁的女人,由于气道困难,对全身麻醉犹豫不决,选择椎弓根螺钉固定L4椎板切除术(L3-L5)的神经轴麻醉。术前,她接受了150微克丁丙诺啡和1毫克咪达唑仑.在横向位置,放置了T8-T9硬膜外导管,随后在T10-T11进行节段性脊髓麻醉(2.5mL0.5%高压布比卡因+30µg可乐定).使用标准技术执行俯卧定位。在6-7个小时的手术中,每隔90分钟给予3次7mL硬膜外灌注(2%利多卡因肾上腺素).血液动力学在2.5L晶体下保持稳定,350毫升的红细胞和三剂麻黄碱(每剂6毫克)。镇静包括150µg丁丙诺啡和两个1mg咪达唑仑剂量。术后,她接受了0.25%布比卡因硬膜外2天,全身镇痛药,第六天出院。
    A woman in her mid-50s, hesitant about general anaesthesia due to a difficult airway, opted for neuraxial anaesthesia for L4 laminectomy with pedicle screw fixation (L3-L5). Preoperatively, she received 150 µg buprenorphine and 1 mg midazolam. In lateral position, a T8-T9 epidural catheter was placed, followed by segmental spinal anaesthesia (2.5 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine+30 µg clonidine) at T10-T11. Prone positioning was executed using standard techniques. During the 6-7 hours surgery, three 7 mL epidural top-ups (2% lignocaine epinephrine) were administered at 90 min intervals. Haemodynamics remained stable with 2.5 L crystalloids, 350 mL packed red cells and three ephedrine doses (6 mg each). Sedation included 150 µg buprenorphine and two 1 mg midazolam doses. Postoperatively, she received epidural 0.25% bupivacaine for 2 days, systemic analgesics and was discharged on the sixth day.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景在儿科牙科,镇静旨在消除焦虑,以促进牙科手术的完成。儿童中的镇静是一个多维字段,包括儿童,父母/监护人,还有医疗团队.直肠途径通常是无痛的,使其适合害怕针头的儿童。这种途径比口服途径有几个优点,包括减少患者合作要求,更快、更可预测的发作,与静脉和肌肉内途径相比,身体创伤更小。本病例系列旨在评估氯胺酮和咪达唑仑直肠镇静在牙科治疗期间治疗不合作儿童的有效性和成功率。案例介绍本研究招募了10名绝对消极行为的健康儿童。每个孩子通过直肠途径给予7mg/kg的氯胺酮与0.1mg/kg的咪达唑仑组合。平均起效镇静时间为9.5分钟,并进行了牙髓切除术。使用俄亥俄州立大学行为评定量表(OSUBRS)在整个治疗过程中监测行为反应,使用密歇根大学镇静量表(UMSS)测量镇静深度。Houpt一般行为量表用于根据总体行为评级评估治疗成功率。10例直肠给药后均表现出良好的抗焦虑和合作。没有观察到副作用。结论氯胺酮联合咪达唑仑直肠给药可能是治疗牙科治疗期间不合作儿童的可靠方法。在镇静过程期间或之后未观察到不良反应。
    Background In pediatric dentistry, sedation aims to eliminate anxiety to facilitate the completion of dental procedures. Sedation in children is a multidimensional field that includes the child, parents/guardians, and the health care team. The rectal route is generally painless, making it suitable for children who are afraid of needles. This route has several advantages over the oral route, including reduced patient cooperation requirements, a faster and more predictable onset, and less physical trauma than the intravenous and intramuscular routes. This case series aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and success rate of rectal sedation with ketamine and midazolam in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment. Case presentation Ten healthy children with definitely negative behavior were enrolled in this study. Each child was given 7 mg/kg of ketamine in combination with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg by the rectal route. The mean onset sedation time was 9.5 minutes, and pulpotomy procedures were done. Behavioral response was monitored throughout treatment using the Ohio State University Behavioral Rating Scale (OSUBRS), and the depth of sedation was measured using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS). The Houpt General Behavior Scale was used to estimate the treatment success rate based on the overall behavior rating. All 10 cases showed good anxiolysis and cooperation following rectal administration, with no side effects observed. Conclusions Rectal administration of ketamine in combination with midazolam may be considered a reliable method in the management of uncooperative children during dental treatment. No adverse effects were observed during or after the sedation procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    咪达唑仑是一种常用的,耐受性良好,抗焦虑药,镇静剂,麻醉诱导剂,以及在急诊科广泛使用的程序性镇静辅助手段。通过多种途径给予咪达唑仑的能力,包括鼻内,使其成为儿童使用的特别常见的选择。鼻内给药是安全的,easy,并且耐受性良好,已被证明是获得抗焦虑和/或镇静的有效方法。药物不良反应,包括过敏反应,可以用任何药物治疗。然而,过敏反应是咪达唑仑的罕见现象。尽管是急诊科和手术室中最常见的药物之一,只有少数明确的继发于咪达唑仑的过敏反应病例.此演示文稿的稀有性可能导致护理延迟和潜在的不良后果。我们介绍了一例10岁的患者,该患者在鼻内咪达唑仑给药后出现过敏反应,以促进计算机断层扫描。
    Midazolam is a commonly used, well-tolerated, anxiolytic, sedative, anesthesia induction agent, and an adjunct for procedural sedation that is used widely in the emergency department. The ability to administer midazolam via multiple routes, including intranasal, makes it a particularly common choice for use in children. Intranasal administration is safe, easy, and well tolerated and has been shown to be an effective method of obtaining anxiolysis and/or sedation. Adverse drug reactions, including allergic reactions, can occur with any medication. However, anaphylaxis is an uncommon phenomenon from midazolam. Despite being one of the most common medications used in the emergency department and operating room, there are only a handful of unequivocal cases of anaphylaxis secondary to midazolam. The rarity of this presentation may lead to delays in care and potential adverse outcomes as a result. We present one such case of a 10-year-old patient who experienced anaphylaxis after administration of intranasal midazolam to facilitate a computed tomography scan.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:苯磺酸雷米唑仑,一种新开发的药物,与各种过敏反应病例有关。我们介绍了一例使用激发试验证实的瑞咪唑仑过敏反应。病例:一名51岁的女性患者被安排进行肱骨固定。全身麻醉是用雷米唑仑诱导的,罗库溴铵,还有瑞芬太尼.气管插管后,患者血压下降,心率加快,和全身性皮疹.反复服用肾上腺素,病人的生命体征稳定了.急性期类胰蛋白酶水平在正常范围内。四周后,皮内试验结果为阴性。当静脉内给药瑞马唑仑进行激发试验时,面部肿胀,冲洗,出现咳嗽,用肾上腺素改善。使用激发试验将罪魁祸首药物鉴定为瑞米唑仑。结论:当麻醉诱导过程中发生过敏反应时,不应排除雷米唑仑作为致病药物。如果瑞米唑仑的皮肤测试结果为阴性,应该考虑挑衅测试。在仔细的患者监测下,应谨慎地在低剂量下启动激发试验。
    Background: Remimazolam besylate, a newly developed drug, is linked to various anaphylaxis cases. We present a case of remimazolam anaphylaxis confirmed using a provocation test. Case: A 51-year-old female patient was scheduled for humeral pinning. General anesthesia was induced using remimazolam, rocuronium, and remifentanil. After tracheal intubation, the patient experienced decreased blood pressure, increased heart rate, and a systemic rash. Epinephrine was administered repeatedly, and the patient\'s vital signs stabilized. Acute phase tryptase levels were within normal limits. After four weeks, intradermal test results were negative. When remimazolam was administered intravenously for the provocation test, facial swelling, flushing, and coughing occurred, which improved with epinephrine. The culprit drug was identified as remimazolam using a provocation test. Conclusions: When anaphylaxis occurs during anesthesia induction, remimazolam should not be ruled out as the causative drug. If the skin test result for remimazolam is negative, a provocation test should be considered. The provocation test should be initiated cautiously at a low dose under careful patient monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号