BACKGROUND: Both running horizontal mattress (HM) and running subcuticular (SQ) suturing techniques have been suggested to be superior to other running cuticular suturing techniques . These two techniques have not been directly compared.
OBJECTIVE: To compare cosmetic outcomes between a running HM and a running SQ technique in a split scar model following linear closure of trunk and extremity defects.
METHODS: Fifty patients were enrolled in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-scar study. One side of the surgical wound was randomized to receive one intervention (HM vs SQ) with the other side receiving the alternate intervention. The primary outcome was the POSAS score at a minimum of 3 months post-operatively.
RESULTS: Observer POSAS sum of components was 19.49 and 17.76 for HM and SQ, respectively (p=0.14). The mean score for patient overall opinion was 4.71 for HM and 3.50 for the SQ technique (p=0.02). Overall opinion scores of evaluators were 3.87 and 3.29 for HM and SQ, respectively (p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-center study of a relatively homogenous population.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no significant difference in the sum of POSAS components between HM and SQ (p=0.14), both patients and evaluators had a superior overall opinion of the SQ-treated side (patient p=0.02, evaluator p=0.03).

BACKGROUND: The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is frequently used to assess scar quality after burns. It is important to be aware of the minimal important change (MIC) and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to establish if a POSAS score represents a clinically relevant change or difference. The aim of this study is to explore the MIC and MCID of POSAS version 2.0.
METHODS: This prospective study included 127 patients with deep dermal burns that underwent split thickness skin grafting with a mean age of 44 years (range 0 - 87) and total body surface area burned of 10 % (range 0.5 - 55). POSAS data was obtained for one burn scar area at three, six, and 12 months after split skin grafting. At the second and third visits, patients rated the degree of clinical change in scar quality in comparison to the previous visit. At 12 months, they completed the POSAS for a second burn scar area and rated the degree of clinical difference between the two scar areas. Two anchor-based methods were used to determine the MIC and MCID.
RESULTS: MIC values of the patient POSAS ranged from - 0.59 to - 0.29 between three and six months and from - 0.75 to - 0.38 between six and 12 months follow-up. Both had a poor discriminatory value. MCID values ranged from - 0.39 and - 0.08, with a better discriminatory value.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that patients consider minor differences (less than 0.75 on the 1-10 scale) in POSAS scores as clinically important scar quality changes. MCID values can be used to evaluate the effects of burn treatment and perform sample-size calculations.

BACKGROUND: Scar formation after neck surgery is a frequent concern, impacting patients both physically and psychologically. Cosmetic appearance plays a crucial role in assessing surgical success. At present, the evolving medical technologies introduces innovations like Geometric Electron Modulation (GEM) electrocautery. GEM technology offers potential benefits such as reduced thermal injury and consistent heat emission during surgery compared to conventional electrocautery.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference between postoperative neck scars from the surgical blade as the gold standard and geometric electron modulation electrocautery.
METHODS: A randomized controlled study was performed on the patients who were diagnosed with surgical conditions requiring neck surgery at the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, from 2023 to 2024. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale was utilized to assess scar appearance at 1 and 3 months following the surgery, and the amount of blood loss during incision was recorded.
RESULTS: 22 patients were enrolled to this study. At 1-month follow-up, we saw significant difference between GEM (20.32 ± 4.11) and the surgical blade (23.27 ± 4.59) (P = 0.008) from POSAS, patient scale but no significant difference in doctor scale, (GEM 21.55 ± 7.34, surgical blade 24.27 ± 7.88, P = 0.155). At 3-month follow-up, there were no significant difference between the groups both doctor (GEM 16.45 ± 4.62, surgical blade 17.65 ± 4.50, P = 0.411) and patient scale (GEM 13.15 ± 2.96, surgical blade 14.05 ± 3.33, P = 0.328).
CONCLUSIONS: GEM electrocautery had a superior scar outcome to a surgical blade at 1 month from the patient perspective. There was also significantly less blood loss in GEM compared with the surgical blade.

BACKGROUND: Scarring after burn injuries remains one of the major challenges in burn medicine and is the subject of current research. Accurate and high-quality assessment of scars is needed to enable exact outcome evaluation of different treatments. Our aim was to evaluate the most common subjective scar evaluation scores-the POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale) and VSS (Vancouver Scar Scale)-in comparison with the objective device Mexameter® for colour evaluation.
METHODS: A prospective monocentre study was performed, which included 120 examined scar areas of 60 patients with third degree burns who had received skin grafts between 1975 and 2018 with a total burned surface area (TBSA) > 2%. Two different scar areas in comparison with one healthy skin area concerning \'colour\', \'pigmentation\', and \'vascularization\' were evaluated by the Mexameter® MX 18, the OSAS, and the VSS by the same examiner, as well as the PSAS by the patient.
RESULTS: The mean TBSA of the 60 patients was 24.3%. In the OSAS, 61% of the scars were evaluated as \'hyper-\', 19% as \'hypo-\', and 19% as \'mix-pigmented\'. Furthermore, 65% of the scars were estimated as highly vascularized. In the Mexameter®, the melanin index values of the scar areas compared to the healthy skin areas showed a small difference of 12 (p < 0.05). The mean difference of erythema between the scar and the healthy skin areas was 84 (p < 0.001). For the Mexameter®, moderate correlations were found when comparing \'erythema\' with the OSAS category \'vascularization\' (r = 0.33, p < 0.05) and \'melanin\' with the OSAS parameter \'pigmentation\' (r = 0.28, p < 0.05). When comparing the Mexameter® measurements to the OSAS questionnaire, 27% of the scars were wrongly evaluated as \'hyperpigmented\' by the observer and 21% as \'hypervascularized\', while showing low measurements in the device. Additionally, a novel Mexameter® ordinal scare scale was calculated.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we were able to show on a relatively large patient population that with the Mexameter®, the subjectivity of the scar colour assessment by examiner/patient can be overcome, but precise differentiation can still be ensured with subjective evaluation tools. We further introduced a novel Mexameter® Scar Scale. It is necessary to further investigate the vast range of objective devices and develop scar panels for with an incorporation of objective and subjective devices to further improve reliability with reduced bias in terms of scar assessment.

Background Post-surgical scars (PSS) are an expected consequence of surgery. Several factors have previously been associated with PSS satisfaction including patient age and time elapsed post-operative. Little data are available regarding patient attitudes toward orthopaedic PSS. Knowledge of patient attitudes and the various associated factors may allow physicians to administer peri-operative care to mitigate the potential negative effects of PSS. Our study aims to investigate the attitudes of patients toward their PSS using quantitative scar assessment scales and to identify factors associated with PSS satisfaction. Methods We conducted a retrospective study with a follow-up. We included all patients with orthopaedic PSS on their upper or lower limbs between two and 18 weeks postoperative attending Cork University Hospital, Ireland, between February and August 2022. Patients completed an initial baseline questionnaire and then a follow-up questionnaire six months post-operative. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) evaluated PSS satisfaction. The European Quality of Life 5 Domain (EQ-5D), alongside several Likert scales, evaluated the patient\'s quality of life (QoL). Results In total, 91 patients were included. The mean POSAS score was 28.41 (95% CI, 25.85-30.97). Younger patient age (p=0.045) and decreased time passed post-operatively (p=0.002) were associated with poorer PSS satisfaction. Patients reporting their PSS appearing worse than expected were more likely to agree that their QoL had been adversely affected by it (p=0.001). Conclusion Most patients were satisfied with their orthopaedic PSS. This study identified several factors associated with poor PSS satisfaction. Our finding, which associated patient scar expectations and QoL, is novel and has not been previously examined. Accordingly, peri-operative interventions, including scar expectation management, may be implemented to mitigate scar-related QoL impact.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgeons are increasingly using surgical adhesives in their practice. Studies comparing sutured wounds to those that utilize a combination of suturing and skin adhesive have not been previously conducted.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the cosmetic outcome and patient wound care satisfaction of an intermediate suture closure with an intermediate suture closure followed by the application of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (2-OCA).
METHODS: Fifty patients were enrolled in a randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-scar study. Following intermediate sutured closure of a surgical defect, one side of the wound was randomized to receive an additional application of 2-OCA. After 3 months, the scar was assessed using the POSAS tool and patients reported wound care preferences.
RESULTS: As the primary outcome measure, the mean sum of observer POSAS was 12.80 for sutured closure alone versus 12.40 for sutured closures followed by 2-OCA (P = .49).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-center study of a relatively homogenous population.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no significant differences in scar cosmesis, both patients and observers tended to prefer the side with an additional application of 2-OCA in most POSAS components, in overall opinion, and in patient wound care satisfaction. Dermatologic surgeons may add this to their practice without sacrificing scar outcomes or patient satisfaction.

Introduction: Different therapies have been applied to keloids and hypertrophic scars. Intense pulsed light (IPL) has recently been used but the evidence is limited. This study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IPL as monotherapy for keloids and hypertrophic scars. Methods: This was a before-and-after interventional study on 16 patients with 50 scars who underwent IPL. Seven scars receive one IPL session, seven received two sessions, and 36 received three sessions. Outcomes were evaluated by the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), scar ultrasound, colorimeter for pigmentation and erythema, and side effects. Results: After the treatment, most outcomes significantly improved except that the pigmentation of the scars did not change. Scar thickness significantly reduced by nearly 10% after the first IPL session, 15% after the second session, and>20% after the third session. All side effects were mild with crust (33.3-46%), blisters (8.3-40%), and hyperpigmentation around the scar (0-14%); the pain was moderate as assessed by the patients. Conclusion: IPL is a safe and effective treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars. More studies are required to confirm our results.

OBJECTIVE: A notable advantage of laparoscopic colorectal surgery is that only a small incision at the extraction site is necessary, which is considered to be cosmetically beneficial. Meanwhile, the optimal extraction site for the resected specimen in laparoscopic colectomy is controversial in terms of cosmetic benefit. This randomized controlled trial compares midline and off-midline extraction sites in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with colon cancer, with consideration of cosmetic benefits as the primary endpoint.
METHODS: Included were patients that underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy at WMUH between October 2014 and February 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to either midline incision group or off-midline incision group. Prospectively collected data included cosmetic results (patients and observer assessment scale) and complications including incidence of incisional hernia, SSI, and pain. This trial was registered with UMIN Clinical Trials (UMIN000028943).
RESULTS: Finally, 98 patients with colorectal cancer were analyzed. No significant differences were found between the two groups in patient and observer assessment scales of cosmetic results (midline 8 ± 1.1 vs off-midline 11 ± 5.9 p = 0.16, midline 13.5 ± 6.6 vs off-midline 15 ± 11 p = 0.58, respectively) or in postoperative pain. However, incisional hernia occurred in four cases in the midline group (8%), which was significantly higher than that in the off-midline group (no cases, 0%).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in terms of cosmetic benefit, the primary endpoint, between the two groups. In this study, only the extraction site location was compared; future studies will examine differences depending on the incisional direction, including the incidence of incisional hernia.

Controversy remains regarding the optimal technique and suture type for wound closure after carpal tunnel surgery. Adult patients undergoing open carpal tunnel release were prospectively randomized to receive either interrupted, buried Monocryl sutures or traditional nylon horizontal mattress sutures for their wound closures. At the 2-week and 6-week postoperative visits, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale questionnaires were completed. At 2 weeks, patients and observers had a significantly better opinion of incisions closed with Monocryl. By 6 weeks, neither patients nor observers found a difference between suture types in any category. Scars of wounds closed with Monocryl did not change appreciably in appearance between 2 and 6 weeks. However, patients and observers noted significant improvement in scar appearance in the nylon group over time. Monocryl suture represents an effective method for carpal tunnel closure that leads to improved patient- and observer-reported outcome scores in the early postoperative period compared with nylon.Level of evidence: II.

Deep partial and full-thickness burns require surgical treatment with autologous skin grafts after necrectomy, which is the generally accepted way to achieve permanent wound coverage. This study sought to examine the grafted and donor areas of children who underwent autologous skin transplantation, using two assessment scales to determine the severity of the scarring and the cosmetic outcome during long-term follow-up. At the Surgical Unit of the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Pécs, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2019, children who had been admitted consecutively and received autologous skin transplantation were analyzed. Twenty patients met the inclusion criteria in this retrospective cohort study. The authors assessed the results using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS). There was a significant difference in how parents and examiners perceived the children\'s scars. In the evaluation of the observer scale, the most critical variables for the area of skin grafted were relief and thickness. Besides color, relief was the worst clinical characteristic on the patient scale. However, when medical professionals evaluated the donor site, significantly better results were obtained compared to the transplanted area (average observer scale score: 1.4 and 2.35, p = 0.001; VSS: 0.85 vs. 2.60, p < 0.001), yet it was similar to the graft site in the parents\' opinion (Patient Scale: 2.95 and 4.45, p = 0.181).