POSAS

POSAS
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:梨状窝瘘(PSF)的外科治疗方法正在改进。这项研究的目的是探讨部分瘘管切除术在使用亚甲蓝辅助PSF儿童中的效果。
    方法:根据用于治疗PSF感染的方法,将患者分为保守治疗组,单切口组(儿童通过环甲关节皮纹处的切口引流脓肿),非单切口组(儿童通过脓肿或溃疡最明显区域的切口引流脓肿)。数据来自电子病历(EMR)和医院信息系统(HIS)。比较瘘管切除术后6个月患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)评分。
    结果:共有239例诊断为PSF的患者采用亚甲蓝通过宫颈入路部分切除瘘管。手术成功率为100%。平均手术时间为32±13.2min。平均住院时间为1±0.2天。出现一过性声音嘶哑2例,伤口感染6例。保守治疗组17例,单切口组81例,非单切口组145例。三组POSAS平均评分分别为2.56±0.6,3.12±0.84和4.56±1.56,三组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论:通过颈部单切口使用亚甲蓝辅助部分瘘管切除术治疗儿童PSF成功率高,与传统手术相比,术后并发症少,舒适度高。这种替代手术可用于治疗儿童PSF。
    OBJECTIVE: The surgical treatment of pyriform sinus fistula (PSF) is improving. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of partial fistula excision in children with PSF assisted by using methylene blue.
    METHODS: According to the method used to treat PSF infection, the patients were divided into a conservative treatment group, a single incision group (the children drained the abscess through the incision at the dermatoglyph of the cricothyroid joint), and a non single incision group (the children drained the abscess through the incision in the most obvious area of the abscess or ulceration). The data were retrieved from the electronic medical records (EMRs) and hospital information system (HIS). The patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) scores at 6 months after fistula resection were compared.
    RESULTS: A total of 239 patients diagnosed with PSF underwent partial resection of the fistula through cervical approach with methylene blue. The success rate of the operation was 100%. The average operation time was 32 ± 13.2 min. The average hospital stay was 1 ± 0.2 days. There were 2 cases of transient hoarseness and 6 cases of wound infection. There were 17 patients in the conservative treatment group, 81 patients in the single incision group and 145 patients in the nonsingle incision group. The average POSAS scores of the three groups were 2.56 ± 0.6, 3.12 ± 0.84 and 4.56 ± 1.56, respectively, with significant differences among the three groups (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Partial fistulectomy assisted by using methylene blue through a single incision in the neck for the treatment of PSF in children yields a high success rate, fewer postoperative complications and greater comfort than traditional surgery. This alternative surgery can be used to treat PSF in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Keloids are caused by uncontrolled excessive proliferation of fibrous tissue. Multiple treatment strategies including steroid injection, surgical excision, laser therapy and radiation therapy have been reported. Few studies have evaluated the performance of plasma skin regeneration (PSR) in the treatment of keloid. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PSR combined with radiation therapy for keloids on different body parts.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 71 patients with 98 keloids were enrolled in this study. Keloids <4 mm thick underwent single-dose PSR, while keloids ≥4 mm thick were administered compound betamethasone injection beforehand. Radiation therapy was administered after 24 hours and again 7 days later after PSR. The outcome was evaluated using the patient and observer scar assessment scale at 12 months post-treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Patient-reported average scores for all keloids significantly decreased from 35.05±9.94 to 21.84±7.04 (p < 0.05). Keloids on face and neck, chest, and back responded better than those on shoulders and limbs. The recurrence rate was observed to be 15.3% (15 out of 98). Adverse effects were mild.
    UNASSIGNED: PSR combined with radiation therapy is an effective and safe strategy to treat keloids. Location could be a factor that affects curative effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:甲状腺癌(TC)更可能发生在年轻女性中。这项研究的目的是比较不同甲状腺切除术的美学效果。
    方法:将120例接受甲状腺切除术的女性患者平均分为三组:常规手术(CA),美学原则访问(APA)和微创访问(MIA)。患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)用作线性疤痕的评估工具。
    结果:MIA组患者术中出血量明显减少,排水少,与CA组和APA组相比,疤痕长度更短,引流时间更短。然而,MIA组手术时间129.0min明显长于CA组79.6min和APA组77.0min。最好的美学分数,由观察者疤痕评估量表(OSAS)评估,在APA组中获得。APA组和CA组的患者疤痕评估量表(PSAS)评分明显低于MIA组。APA组的客观瘢痕评分明显低于其他两组。
    结论:这些结果表明,在TC患者中,APA产生了最好的手术结果,表明传统的甲状腺切除术可以使用美学手术原理产生理想的美学效果。为了患者对疤痕的外观满意,甲状腺手术不需要通过过短的切口进行。
    背景:这项临床试验于8月1日在ClinicalTrials.govPRS上进行了回顾性注册,2017(NCT03239769)。
    BACKGROUND: Thyroid carcinoma (TC) is more likely to occur in young women. The aim of this study was to compare the aesthetic effect of different thyroidectomies.
    METHODS: One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar.
    RESULTS: The patients in the MIA group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss, less drainage, a shorter scar length and a shorter duration of drainage than those in the CA group and the APA group. However, the operation time of 129.0 min in the MIA group was significantly longer than the 79.6 min in the CA group and the 77.0 min in the APA group. The best aesthetic score, as assessed by the Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS), was obtained in the APA group. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scores were significantly lower in the APA group and CA group than in the MIA group. Significantly lower objective scar ratings were found in the APA group than in the other two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: These results show that APA produced the best surgical outcomes in TC patients, indicating that conventional thyroidectomy can produce an ideal aesthetic result using the principles of aesthetic surgery. Thyroid surgery need not be performed through excessively short incisions for the sake of patient satisfaction with the scar\'s appearance.
    BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was retrospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov PRS on August 1st,2017 ( NCT03239769 ).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号