Muscle relaxants have broad application in anesthesiology. They can be used for safe intubation, preparing the patient for surgery, or improving mechanical ventilation. Muscle relaxants can be classified based on their mechanism of action into depolarizing and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and centrally acting muscle relaxants. Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) (eg, tubocurarine, atracurium, pipecuronium, mivacurium, pancuronium, rocuronium, vecuronium) act as competitive antagonists of nicotine receptors. By doing so, these drugs hinder the depolarizing effect of acetylcholine, thereby eliminating the potential stimulation of muscle fibers. Depolarizing drugs like succinylcholine and decamethonium induce an initial activation (depolarization) of the receptor followed by a sustained and steady blockade. These drugs do not act as competitive antagonists; instead, they function as more enduring agonists compared to acetylcholine itself. Many factors can influence the duration of action of these drugs. Among them, electrolyte disturbances and disruptions in acid-base balance can have an impact. Acidosis increases the potency of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, while alkalosis induces resistance to their effects. In depolarizing drugs, acidosis and alkalosis produce opposite effects. The results of studies on the impact of acid-base balance disturbances on non-depolarizing relaxants have been conflicting. This work is based on the available literature and the authors\' experience. This article aimed to review the use of anesthetic muscle relaxants in patients with acid-base disturbances.

Anaesthesia induced with remimazolam and a fentanyl-series opioid can be reversed with flumazenil and naloxone. Concomitant paralysis with rocuronium can facilitate tracheal intubation whilst being reversible with sugammadex. Together, this combination might offer full reversibility of a \'routine\' or a \'rapid-sequence\' induction anaesthesia. Whether this is useful, or even safe, requires careful evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of tetanic stimulation on the time to achieve stabilization of the T1 height, by acceleromyography train-of-four (TOF) ratio monitoring, in patients aged 60 to 80 years.
METHODS: Randomized, prospective, single-blind, controlled trial in patients aged 60 to 80 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia in two university hospitals in Brazil between December 2019 and March 2022. This trial was performed in accordance with the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and the guidelines for good clinical research practice in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents II. Participants were randomly allocated by computer-generated numbers to receive tetanic stimulation (intervention group, n  =  25) or not receive tetanic stimulation (control group, n  =  25) to achieve T1 height stabilization on TOF ratio monitoring. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effect of tetanic stimulation on the time to achieve stabilization of the T1 height. We also evaluated the effect on the onset time of rocuronium and time to recover from neuromuscular blockade with a single dose of rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 with spontaneous recovery.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the time to T1 height stabilization (intervention: 4.3 [2.0-8.0] min; control: 5.8 [2.0-10.5] min; p  =  0.202), onset time of the neuromuscular blocking agent (intervention: 1.9 [±0.7] min; control: 2.2 [±1.0] min; p  =  0.219), or neuromuscular blockade recovery times to normalized TOF values of 0.7 (intervention: 106.1 [±37.2] min; control: 91.7 [±27.5] min; p  =  0.295), 0.8 (intervention: 114.3 [±40.1] min; control: 97.8 [±28.9] min; p  =  0.225), 0.9 (intervention: 126.5 [±44.0] min; control: 106.9 [±30.6] min; p  =  0.153), and 1.0 (intervention: 138.3 [±43.4] min; control: 123.8 [±43.5] min; p  =  0.425).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the recommendation to use tetanic stimulation to shorten the time to T1 height stabilization in neuromuscular monitoring did not alter the stabilization time of the T1 twitch or the pharmacodynamics of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium in patients aged 60 to 80 years.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is a pharmacologic agent that provides rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade via encapsulation of the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). The sugammadex-NMBA complex is primarily cleared through glomerular filtration from the kidney, raising the possibility that alterations in renal function could affect its elimination. In pediatric patients, the benefits of sugammadex have led to widespread utilization; however, there is limited information on its application in pediatric renal impairment. This study examined sugammadex use and postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients with severe chronic renal impairment at our quaternary pediatric referral hospital.
METHODS: After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective analysis in pediatric patients with stage IV and V chronic kidney disease who received sugammadex from January 2017 to March 2022. Postoperative outcomes studied included new or increased respiratory requirement, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, postoperative pneumonia, anaphylaxis, and death within 48 h postoperatively, unplanned deferral of intraoperative extubation, and repeat administrations of NMBA reversal after leaving the operating room.
RESULTS: The final cohort included 17 patients ranging from 8 months to 16 years old. One patient required new postoperative noninvasive ventilation on postoperative day 2, which was credited to hypervolemia. Another patient had bronchospasm intraoperatively resolving with medication, which could not definitively be associated sugammadex administration. There were no instances of deferred extubation, unplanned ICU or need for supplemental oxygen after tracheal extubation identified.
CONCLUSIONS: No adverse effects directly attributable to sugammadex in pediatric patients with severe renal impairment were detected. There may be a role for utilization of sugammadex for neuromuscular reversal in this population.

BACKGROUND: The effect of neuromuscular blocking agents may be reversed by administration of neostigmine, when two twitches are present using train-of-four (TOF) stimulation. However, in elderly patients, limited data are available about when to administer neostigmine. We hypothesised that time to two twitches after TOF (TOF-2) was shorter after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg than after rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg. Also, we hypothesised that time to TOF-2 would be shorter after rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg than after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of 50 elderly patients > 80 years; 16 patients received rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg, another 16 patients received rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg; and, finally, 18 patients received rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg. Patients received total intravenous anaesthesia, and neuromuscular block was monitored with acceleromyography.
RESULTS: Time to TOF-2 was shorter after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg than after rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg: 37 min. versus 59 min. (difference: 22 min. (95% confidence intervals (CI): 10 to 33 min.), p = 0.0007). Time to TOF-2 after rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg was shorter than after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg: 19 min. versus 37 min. (difference: 18 min. (95% CI: 11 to 25 min.), p = 0.00006). However, only 33% of the patients receiving 0.3 mg/kg obtained full effect i.e. TOF-0.
CONCLUSIONS: Time to TOF-2 was shorter after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg than after 0.9 mg/kg and shorter after rocuronium 0.3 mg/kg than after 0.6 mg/kg.
BACKGROUND: This work was supported by departmental sources.
BACKGROUND: This study was a secondary analysis of two clinical trials.
RESULTS: gov (NCT04512313), (NCT03857750).

Background: There have been few studies comparing the effects of high- and low-dose rocuronium during cesarean section by directly measuring the concentration. Therefore, we conducted a study to examine the blood concentrations and clinical effects of both doses of rocuronium on mothers and fetuses. Methods: Eighteen patients were randomly assigned to two groups: C Group (0.6 mg/kg), and H Group, (1.0 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the comparison of umbilical vein rocuronium concentration between two groups. We assessed ease of intubation, time from rocuronium administration to some TOF points, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay time, infused remifentanil dose, maternal rocuronium concentration, and Apgar scores. Results: No differences were observed in demographic data, ease of intubation, PACU stay time, 1 min Apgar scores, umbilical venous blood gas analysis between both groups. However, the time from rocuronium administration to T3 disappearance was shorter (p=0.009) and time to T1 and T2 reappearance were longer (p=0.003, p=0.009) in H group than that in C group. The administered remifentanil dose (p=0.042) was lower in the H group than in the C group. Rocuronium concentrations in the umbilical vein (p=0.004) and maternal vein before cord clamping (p=0.002) and at discharge (p<0.001) were also found to be higher in the H group than in the C group. Conclusions: We observed no prolongation of PACU stay, and no differences in Apgar scores in H group compared to C group. It suggests that 1.0 mg/kg of rocuronium has no negative effects on the fetus and mother in cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Deep neuromuscular blockade (d-NMB) is an essential requirement for carboperitoneum during laparoscopy surgery. However, sustaining d-NMB till the completion of surgery delays the reversal of the residual block. Therefore, there is a merit in exploring the effect of synergistic vecuronium-atracurium combination on the duration-of-action of d-NMB during \"laparoscopic\" surgery when we compare intubating bolus non-depolarizers (atracurium, vecuronium) administered alone. This study aims to evaluate whether the synergistic effect atracurium-vecuronium combination increases duration-of-action of d-NMB \"laparoscopic\" surgery settings.
METHODS: Forty-eight patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status- II/III, either sex) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to receive vecuronium (vecuronium group, n = 16) or atracurium (atracurium group, n = 16) or vecuroniumatr-acurium combination (vecuronium-atracurium combination group, n = 16) and analyzed for the effects on the duration-of-action (primary objective); onset-of-action, reversibility, and quality of intubating conditions (secondary objectives) profile of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
RESULTS: Duration-of-action of neuromuscular blockade was significantly longer in patients who received atracurium-vecuronium combination (53.9 ± 9.7 minutes) versus atracurium-alone (41.1 ± 3.8 minutes) or vecuronium-alone (43.5 ± 9.2 minutes) (P = 0.000). No difference was found for the time to onset-of-action (vecuronium [198.1 ± 34.9 seconds], atracurium [188.5 ± 50.6 seconds], or atracurium-vecuronium combination [196.3 ± 46.3 seconds] [P = 0.829]); time for the reversal of muscle relaxation effect (vecuronium [559.9 ± 216.2 seconds], atracurium [584.7 ± 258.3 seconds], and atracurium-vecuronium combination [555.0 ± 205.4 seconds] [P = 0.925]); and quality-of-intubating conditions (vecuronium group [9.6 ± 1.3]; atracurium group [10.0 ± 0.0]; atracurium-vecuronium group [10.0 ± 0.0] [P = 0.182]).
CONCLUSIONS: The synergistic effect of the atracurium-vecuronium combination leads to an increased duration-of-action of d-NMB during laparoscopic cholecystectomy without impacting onset-of-action, quality of intubating conditions, and reversal of muscle relaxant effect.

BACKGROUND Mivacurium is a non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agent. TOF-Cuff® is a device that monitors intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and blood pressure. TOF-Scan® measures muscle relaxation status of an anaesthetized patient. This study included 36 patients aged 18 to 75 years presenting for elective surgery, to compare neuromuscular blockade measured using the TOF-Cuff of the upper arm and the TOF-Scan of the facial corrugator supercilii muscle during general anesthesia and following administration of mivacurium. MATERIAL AND METHODS Train-of-four (TOF) values were obtained every 30 s before intubation and successively every 5 min until extubation. RESULTS The median onset time for TOF-Cuff was longer than for TOF-Scan (210 s vs 90 s, P<0.00001). Multiplying the time to relaxation (according to TOF-Scan) by 1 to 8, respectively, provided concordance with the TOF-Cuff result for the following cumulative percentages of patients: 5.5%, 38.9%, 58.3%, 77.8%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 88.9%, and 91.7%. Analogue values for time to recovery from the last dose were 11.1%, 63.9%, 83.3%, 86.1%, 86.1%, 88.9%, 88.9%, and 91.7%. The proportion of patients who still had TOFratio=0 in the assessment performed at min 15 did not differ significantly between these 2 methods (P=0.088). Both TOF-Scan and TOF-Cuff showed a false-negative result in patients with clinical symptoms of preterm recovery; the numerical difference favored TOF-Cuff (1.6% vs 2.1%) but without statistical significance (P=0.2235). CONCLUSIONS When measurement on the limb is not possible, TOF-Scan on the eyelid can be an alternative for TOF-Cuff on the upper arm, if the time to relaxation is multiplied by at least 8, which is enough for 90% of patients.

OBJECTIVE: In our study, we aimed to compare the effect of standard rapid sequence intubation protocol and the application of rocuronium priming technique on the procedure time and hemodynamic profile.
METHODS: Patients who applied to the emergency department and needed rapid sequence intubation were included in our study, which we conducted with a randomized controlled design. Randomization in the study was made according to the order of arrival of the cases. Rapid sequence intubation was performed in the standard group. In the priming group, 10% of the rocuronium dose was administered approximately 3 min before the induction agent. Intubation time, amount of drug used, vital signs, and end-tidal CO2 level before and after intubation used to confirm intubation were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in the study, of which 26 patients were included in the standard group and 26 patients in the priming group. While intubation time was 121.2±21.9 s in the standard group, it was calculated as 68.4±11.6 s in the priming group (p<0.001). While the mean arterial pressure was 58.3±26.6 mmHg in the standard group after intubation, it was 80.6±21.1 mmHg in the priming group (p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that priming with rocuronium shortened the intubation time and preserved the hemodynamic profile better.
BACKGROUND: NCT05343702.

OBJECTIVE: Residual neuromuscular blockade has been linked to pulmonary complications in the postoperative period. This study aimed to determine whether sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared with neostigmine.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients ≥18 year of age undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures with general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2021. We identified all patients receiving rocuronium and reversal with neostigmine or sugammadex via electronic medical record review. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs (including pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax). The incidence of PPCs was compared using propensity score analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 1786 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 976 (54.6%) received neostigmine, and 810 (45.4%) received sugammadex. In the whole sample, PPCs occurred in 81 (4.54%) subjects (7.04% sugammadex vs. 2.46% neostigmine). Baseline covariates were well balanced between groups after overlap weighting. Patients in the sugammadex group had similar risk (overlap weighting OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.41) compared to neostigmine. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results. In subgroup analysis, the interaction P-value for the reversal agents stratified by surgery duration was 0.011.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the rate of PPCs when the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with sugammadex compared to neostigmine. Patients undergoing prolonged surgery may benefit from sugammadex, which needs to be further investigated.