Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents

神经肌肉非去极化剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Sugammadex是一种通过包封神经肌肉阻断剂(NMBA)快速逆转神经肌肉阻滞的药物。sugammadex-NMBA复合物主要通过肾脏的肾小球过滤清除,增加肾功能改变可能影响其消除的可能性。在儿科患者中,sugammadex的好处导致了广泛的利用;然而,关于其在小儿肾功能损害中的应用信息有限。这项研究在我们的四级儿科转诊医院检查了患有严重慢性肾功能不全的儿科患者的sugammadex使用情况和术后结局。
    方法:IRB批准后,我们对2017年1月至2022年3月接受sugammadex治疗的IV期和V期慢性肾病儿科患者进行了回顾性分析.研究的术后结果包括新的或增加的呼吸需求,计划外重症监护病房(ICU)入院,术后肺炎,过敏反应,术后48小时内死亡,术中拔管的非计划延迟,离开手术室后,重复NMBA逆转的管理。
    结果:最终队列包括17名8个月至16岁的患者。一名患者在术后第2天需要新的术后无创通气,这归因于高血容量。另一名患者术中使用药物缓解支气管痉挛,这不能明确地与sugammadex管理相关。没有延迟拔管的情况,非计划ICU或气管拔管后需要补充氧气。
    结论:在患有严重肾功能损害的儿科患者中,未发现直接归因于sugamadex的不良反应。在该人群中,利用Sugammadex进行神经肌肉逆转可能有作用。
    BACKGROUND: Sugammadex is a pharmacologic agent that provides rapid reversal of neuromuscular blockade via encapsulation of the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA). The sugammadex-NMBA complex is primarily cleared through glomerular filtration from the kidney, raising the possibility that alterations in renal function could affect its elimination. In pediatric patients, the benefits of sugammadex have led to widespread utilization; however, there is limited information on its application in pediatric renal impairment. This study examined sugammadex use and postoperative outcomes in pediatric patients with severe chronic renal impairment at our quaternary pediatric referral hospital.
    METHODS: After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective analysis in pediatric patients with stage IV and V chronic kidney disease who received sugammadex from January 2017 to March 2022. Postoperative outcomes studied included new or increased respiratory requirement, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, postoperative pneumonia, anaphylaxis, and death within 48 h postoperatively, unplanned deferral of intraoperative extubation, and repeat administrations of NMBA reversal after leaving the operating room.
    RESULTS: The final cohort included 17 patients ranging from 8 months to 16 years old. One patient required new postoperative noninvasive ventilation on postoperative day 2, which was credited to hypervolemia. Another patient had bronchospasm intraoperatively resolving with medication, which could not definitively be associated sugammadex administration. There were no instances of deferred extubation, unplanned ICU or need for supplemental oxygen after tracheal extubation identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: No adverse effects directly attributable to sugammadex in pediatric patients with severe renal impairment were detected. There may be a role for utilization of sugammadex for neuromuscular reversal in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    关于全身麻醉下罗库溴铵浸润的报道很少。我们报告了一例在麻醉诱导过程中可疑的意外罗库溴铵浸润。一位25岁的自闭症患者,智力残疾,并计划在全身麻醉下摘除4颗受累的第三磨牙。七氟醚诱导后,在左头静脉建立了静脉(IV)线。服用了罗库溴铵;然而,立即观察到静脉部位的皮下肿胀。保持自发通气,直到通过新的IV线施用额外的罗库溴铵。热包应用后,浸润60分钟后肿胀消失,未观察到组织损伤。制定了一项策略,继续进行神经肌肉监测,直到恢复为止。使用了加速度描记术,渗透后99、130和140分钟的4列比率分别为0.79、0.91和1.0。施用Sugammadex以防止神经肌肉阻滞复发。一旦观察到足够的肌肉功能和意识恢复,就将患者拔管。术后未观察到神经肌肉阻滞延长或复发。当怀疑罗库溴铵渗入时,重要的是消除浸润部位的肿胀,并确定基于神经肌肉监测的管理策略。
    There are few reports on rocuronium infiltration under general anesthesia. We report a case of suspected accidental rocuronium infiltration during anesthesia induction. A 25-year-old woman with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy was scheduled for the extraction of 4 impacted third molars under general anesthesia. After induction with sevoflurane, an intravenous (IV) line was established in the left cephalic vein. Rocuronium was administered; however, subcutaneous swelling at the IV site was observed immediately. Spontaneous ventilations were maintained until additional rocuronium was administered via a new IV line. After heat pack application, the swelling disappeared 60 minutes after infiltration, and no tissue damage was observed. A strategy was developed to continue neuromuscular monitoring until recovery occurred. Acceleromyography was used, and the train-of-4 ratios at 99, 130, and 140 minutes after infiltration were 0.79, 0.91, and 1.0, respectively. Sugammadex was administered to prevent neuromuscular blockade recurrence. The patient was extubated once adequate return of muscle function and consciousness were observed. No neuromuscular block prolongation or recurrence were observed postoperatively. When rocuronium infiltration is suspected, it is important to eliminate swelling at the infiltration site and determine a management strategy based on neuromuscular monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    服用sumgammadex逆转神经肌肉阻滞可引起明显的心动过缓,很少发生心搏停止。在这种情况下,快速发作,双相心率反应;减慢然后加快,在稳定状态下给药sugammadex后,1.3%潮气末七氟烷。在检查心电图(ECG)时,心率减慢与二度的发作相吻合,Mobitz类型I块持续45秒。没有其他事件,毒品,或刺激与事件相吻合。房室传导阻滞的急性发作和短暂性质,没有缺血的证据,这意味着sugammadex给药后对房室结的短暂副交感神经作用。
    Administering sugammadex to reverse neuromuscular blockade can cause marked bradycardia and rarely asystole. In this case, a rapid onset, biphasic heart rate response; slowing then speeding, after administering sugammadex was noted while at steady state, 1.3% end-tidal sevoflurane. On review of the electrocardiogram (ECG), the heart rate slowing coincided with the onset of a second-degree, Mobitz type I block that lasted 45 seconds. No other events, drugs, or stimuli coincided with the event. The acute onset and transient nature of the atrioventricular block without evidence of ischemia implies a brief parasympathetic effect on the atrioventricular node after sugammadex administration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景技术麻醉后残余神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBA)的不完全恢复是麻醉后护理单元中的严重不良事件。乙酰胆碱酯酶新斯的明通常用于逆转残余的神经肌肉阻滞,促进自主呼吸和气管内拔管。病例报告一名40岁妇女接受了斜视矫正手术的全身麻醉。手术结束时,高达85µg/kg的新斯的明重复剂量未能逆转残余的神经肌肉阻滞(四[TOF]比率低于21%).Sugammadex(200毫克)提供了立即逆转,TOF比率高达100%。病人恢复了自主呼吸,并拔除气管导管。手术后,诊断为重症肌无力。结论当出现意想不到的长时间神经肌肉阻滞时,应使用TOF比率来检测其深度并指导逆转剂的合理剂量。抗胆碱酯酶具有上限效应;一旦乙酰胆碱酯酶活性被完全抑制,额外的抗胆碱酯酶的给药可能导致没有进一步的恢复。此外,过量的乙酰胆碱会导致肌肉无力。相比之下,sugammadex是类固醇NMBA的选择性逆转剂,通过与氨基类固醇的紧密水溶性复合物包封起作用(例如,罗库溴铵),而不是在神经肌肉接头处增加乙酰胆碱。在这种情况下,sugammadex从中度神经肌肉阻滞中恢复的效果比新斯的明更有效,更快。当反复服用抗胆碱酯酶后出现难治性和长期残留的神经肌肉阻滞时,sugammadex应被视为有效的逆转剂。特别是在重症肌无力的情况下,sugammadex在逆转手术患者罗库溴铵诱导的NMBA方面优于新斯的明。
    BACKGROUND Incomplete recovery from residual neuromuscular block agent (NMBA) after anesthesia is a serious adverse event in the post-anesthesia care unit. Acetylcholinesterase neostigmine is usually used to reverse residual neuromuscular blockade and facilitate spontaneous breathing and endotracheal extubation. CASE REPORT A 40-year-old woman received general anesthesia for strabismus correction surgery. At the end of surgery, repeated doses of neostigmine up to 85 µg/kg failed to reverse the residual neuromuscular blockade (train-of-four [TOF] ratio below 21%). Sugammadex (200 mg) provided immediate reversal, with the TOF ratio up to 100%. The patient regained spontaneous breathing, and the endotracheal tube was removed. After surgery, myasthenia gravis was diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS When unexpected prolonged neuromuscular blockade presents, the TOF ratio should be used to detect its depth and guide a reasonable dose of reversal agents. Anticholinesterase has a ceiling effect; once acetylcholinesterase activity is fully inhibited, administration of additional anticholinesterase can result in no further recovery. Furthermore, excessive acetylcholine can cause muscle weakness. In contrast, sugammadex is a selective reversal agent for steroidal NMBA, which works by encapsulation via tight water-soluble complexes with amino steroids (eg, rocuronium) rather than increasing acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. In this case, the recovery from moderate neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex was more effective and rapid than that by neostigmine. When refractory and prolonged residual neuromuscular blockade presents after repeated doses of anticholinesterase, sugammadex should be considered as an effective reversal agent. Particularly in cases of myasthenia gravis, sugammadex is superior to neostigmine for reversing rocuronium-induced NMBA in patients undergoing surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:神经肌肉阻滞剂(NMBAs)的Sugammadex逆转通常在术后进行。缺乏文献来探索Sugammadex用于神经外科患者的及时神经系统检查。NMBA,比如罗库溴铵,在插管期间在急诊科使用,其不可预测的作用持续时间通常会阻碍患者神经状态的及时准确评估。我们旨在探讨sugammadex在评估需要急性神经外科护理的患者中的作用。
    方法:在我们的1级创伤中心对出现创伤性脑损伤或颅内出血的患者进行回顾性评估。感兴趣的患者是那些sugammadex逆转罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞的患者,从插管剂量,旨在确保及时的神经系统评估。9名患者被确定为GCS前/后sugammadex,罗库溴铵剂量,罗库溴铵给药和逆转之间的经过时间,并检索临床课程数据。
    结果:到达GCS为5.2±3.2,插管在出现后10±2.5分钟内完成。罗库溴铵的剂量在患者之间是一致的,平均单剂量为1.2±0.3mg/kg。持续的神经肌肉阻滞范围为28至132分钟(87.3±34.3分钟)。所有患者在初始神经外科评估时表现出3T的GCS,在逆转之前。逆转后GCS升至6.0T±2.2。Sugammadex促进了9名患者中的8名更准确的临床决策,包括预防不必要的侵入性程序。9名患者中有2名最终出院或康复机构。
    结论:罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞可以超出药代动力学预测,从而延迟及时和精确的神经评估。我们的数据表明,sugammadex可能是临床医生在神经外科人群中进行急性神经系统评估的有用补充。Sugammadex可能会影响某些患者的临床决策,并允许家庭和医生做出更明智的决策。需要前瞻性研究来明确评估sugammadex对急性神经外科手术结局的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) is usually performed postoperatively. A scarcity of literature exists exploring sugammadex use for timely neurological examination of neurosurgical patients. NMBAs, like rocuronium, are used in the Emergency Department during intubation and their unpredictable duration of action often impedes timely and accurate assessment of patient neurological status. We aim to explore the role of sugammadex in evaluating patients in need of acute neurosurgical care.
    METHODS: Retrospective assessment of patients presenting with traumatic brain injury or intracranial hemorrhage was conducted at our level 1 trauma center. Patients of interest were those for whom sugammadex reversal of rocuronium neuromuscular blockade, from intubating doses, was pursued to ensure timely neurologic assessment. Nine patients were identified for whom GCS pre-/post-sugammadex, rocuronium dosing, elapsed time between rocuronium administration and reversal, and clinical course data were retrieved.
    RESULTS: Arrival GCS was 5.2 ± 3.2, with intubation accomplished within 10 ± 2.5 min of presentation. Rocuronium dosing was consistent between patients, average single dose of 1.2 ± 0.3 mg/kg. Lingering neuromuscular blockade ranged from 28 to 132 min (87.3 ± 34.3 min). All patients exhibited a GCS of 3 T upon initial neurosurgical evaluation, prior to reversal. Post-reversal GCS rose to 6.0 T ± 2.2. Sugammadex facilitated more accurate clinical decision making in 8 of 9 patients, including prevention of unnecessary invasive procedures. Two of 9 patients were eventually discharged home or to a rehabilitation facility.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rocuronium neuromuscular blockade can linger beyond pharmacokinetic predictions, thus delaying timely and precise neurologic assessment. Our data suggests sugammadex may be a useful addition to the clinician\'s armamentarium for acute neurologic assessment in the neurosurgical population. Sugammadex may impact clinical decision-making in certain patients and allow for more informed decision-making by families and physicians alike. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the impact of sugammadex on outcomes in acute neurosurgical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    尽管麻醉期间的过敏反应是罕见的事件,神经肌肉阻滞药物是62%的麻醉相关过敏反应的原因.然而,sugammadex,一种改性的γ-环糊精,可以封装罗库溴铵分子并导致神经肌肉阻滞的快速逆转。一名接受根治性前列腺切除术的68岁男子被静脉注射芬太尼/异丙酚/罗库溴铵诱导。他以前没有接受过罗库溴铵,但接受过顺式阿曲库铵。麻醉后不久,病人的心率突然增加,收缩压(SBP)降至40mmHg。尽管心肺复苏和强化管理,他的血流动力学稳定性没有改善,直到他接受静脉注射sugammadex,200毫克。皮内皮肤测试显示他的顺式阿曲库铵呈阳性,罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱.怀疑患者具有罗库溴铵与顺式阿曲库铵的交叉反应性。此案例凸显了Sugammadex作为罗库溴铵引起的过敏反应期间常规措施的辅助手段的潜在益处。
    Although anaphylaxis during anaesthesia is a rare event, neuromuscular blocking drugs are responsible for 62% of anaesthesia-related anaphylaxis. However, sugammadex, a modified gamma-cyclodextrin, can encapsulate rocuronium molecules and cause the rapid reversal of the neuromuscular blockade. A 68-year-old man who presented for a radical prostatectomy was induced with IV fentanyl/propofol/rocuronium. He had not received rocuronium previously but had received cisatracurium. Shortly after anaesthesia, the patient\'s heart rate abruptly increased, and systolic blood pressure (SBP) dropped to 40 mm Hg. Despite cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intensive management, his haemodynamic stability did not improve until he received IV sugammadex, 200 mg. Intradermal skin tests showed he was positive for cisatracurium, rocuronium and succinylcholine. The patient was suspected to have cross-reactivity of rocuronium with cisatracurium. This case highlights the potential benefit of sugammadex as an adjunct to conventional measures during rocuronium-induced anaphylaxis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童残余神经肌肉阻滞的患病率和危险因素仍未明确。我们假设特定患者和麻醉危险因素可能与新斯的明罗库溴铵初始逆转后的儿童额外逆转有关。
    我们的电子健康记录被查询为从2017年到2020年接受罗库溴铵和新斯的明逆转的年龄<18岁的患者。接受其他非去极化神经肌肉阻滞药物的患者被排除在外。感兴趣的结果被定义为在用新斯的明初次逆转后施用额外的新斯的明或Sugammadex。最后一次罗库溴铵和新斯的明初始剂量之间的时间,和罗库溴铵的累积剂量是二分法。这些与其他协变量相结合,包括年龄,体重,性别,种族群体,程序类型,ASA物理状态,>1剂量罗库溴铵在操作过程中给予,初始新斯的明剂量<0.05mgkg-1,使用四人组监控,麻醉持续时间,住院或门诊,紧急情况下,神经肌肉疾病,和极端的体重,评估与主要结局可能的关联。
    在研究期间,101/6373(1.58%)患者接受了罗库溴铵和额外的逆转。最后一次剂量的罗库溴铵和新斯的明之间的时间二分法产生<28分钟,自上一次剂量的罗库溴铵和累积剂量>0.45mgkg-1hr-1。这些与OR为1.52(95%CI,1.08-2.35)和OR为1.71(95%CI,1.10-2.67)的额外逆转有关,分别。其他危险因素包括新斯的明初始剂量<0.05mgkg-1,或4.98(95%CI,2.84-6.49),和非洲裔美国人种族,OR1.78(95%CI,1.07-2.87)。
    与额外逆转给药相关的危险因素包括从最后一次罗库溴铵到新斯的明初始剂量的时间<28分钟,罗库溴铵的累积剂量>0.45mgkg-1hr-1,初始新斯的明剂量<0.05mgkg-1,和非洲裔美国人种族。
    The prevalence and risk factors for residual neuromuscular blockade in children remain poorly characterized. We hypothesize that specific patient and anesthetic risk factors may be associated with the administration of additional reversal in children following initial reversal of rocuronium with neostigmine.
    Our electronic health record was queried for patients <18 years of age who received rocuronium and reversal with neostigmine from 2017 through 2020. Patients receiving other nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs were excluded. The outcome of interest was defined as the administration of additional neostigmine or sugammadex following primary reversal with neostigmine. Time between the last dose of rocuronium and initial dose of neostigmine, and the cumulative dose of rocuronium were dichotomized. These were combined with other covariates including age, weight, sex, racial group, procedure type, ASA physical status, >1 rocuronium dose administered during the procedure, initial neostigmine dose <0.05 mg kg-1 , use of train-of-four monitoring, duration of anesthesia, inpatient or outpatient, emergency case, neuromuscular disease, and extremes of weight, to assess possible associations with the primary outcome.
    During the study period, 101/6373 (1.58%) patients received rocuronium and additional reversal. Dichotomization of time between last dose of rocuronium and neostigmine yielded <28 min since the last dose of rocuronium and cumulative dose of rocuronium >0.45 mg kg-1  hr-1 . These were associated with the administration of additional reversal with an OR 1.52 (95% CI, 1.08-2.35) and OR 1.71 (95% CI, 1.10-2.67), respectively. Other risk factors included an initial neostigmine dose <0.05 mg kg-1 , OR 4.98 (95% CI, 2.84-6.49), and African American race, OR 1.78 (95% CI, 1.07-2.87).
    Risk factors associated with the administration of additional reversal included time <28 min from the last dose of rocuronium to initial dose of neostigmine, cumulative dose of rocuronium >0.45 mg kg-1  hr-1 , initial neostigmine dose <0.05 mg kg-1 , and African American race.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    过敏反应是由不同的抗原刺激引发的广泛的超敏反应过程,导致肥大细胞脱颗粒的最终效果和不利的生理作用。围手术期,最常见的药物包括抗生素,神经肌肉阻断剂(罗库溴铵和琥珀酰胆碱),氯己定,和用于放射成像的碘化染料。Sugammadex是一种用于逆转使用罗库溴铵或维库溴铵实现的神经肌肉阻滞的新型药剂。其独特的作用机制,它与罗库溴铵包封并形成一对一的络合物,已导致其在治疗罗库溴铵后的过敏性和类过敏反应中用作辅助手段。当前的手稿讨论了sugammadex在服用罗库溴铵后治疗过敏反应中的潜在用途,回顾以前关于其在这些场景中使用的轶事报告,并为未来的护理提供建议。
    Allergic reactions are generalized hypersensitivity processes triggered by different antigenic stimuli, resulting in the end effect of mast cell degranulation and adverse physiologic effects. During the perioperative period, the most commonly identified agents include antibiotics, neuromuscular blocking agents (rocuronium and succinylcholine), chlorhexidine, and iodinated dyes for radiologic imaging. Sugammadex is a novel agent for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade achieved with rocuronium or vecuronium. Its unique mechanism of action, whereby it encapsulates and forms a one-to-one complex with rocuronium, has led to its anecdotal use as an adjunct in the treatment of anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions following rocuronium. The current manuscript discusses the potential use of sugammadex in the treatment of allergic reactions following the administration of rocuronium, reviews previous anecdotal reports of its use in these scenarios, and provides recommendations for future care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Sugammadex是一种独特的神经肌肉逆转药物,通过封装神经肌肉松弛剂分子并将其从其作用部位移出。Sugammadex已被批准用于2岁以上的儿科患者。尽管已经报道了心律失常,健康儿童没有不良反应的报告,如严重的心动过缓需要干预。我们报告了健康儿童服用sugammadex后立即发生的两例严重心动过缓。我们的目的是警惕sugammadex最严重的不良反应之一的发生,在健康的儿科人群中也是如此。
    Sugammadex is a distinctive neuromuscular reversal drug that acts by encapsulating the neuromuscular relaxant molecule and dislodging it from its site of action. Sugammadex has been approved for pediatric patients over 2 years of age. Although arrhythmias have been reported, there is no report of adverse effects in healthy children, such as severe bradycardia requiring intervention. We report two cases of severe bradycardia immediately after the administration of sugammadex in healthy children. Our aim is to alert to the occurrence of one of the most severe adverse effects of sugammadex, in the healthy pediatric population as well.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    Perioperative management in patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis is challenging. Most recommendations regarding anesthetic management in these patients are based on clinical reports, and there are controversies about the use of rocuronium and sugammadex. We present a case report of a patient with systemic mastocytosis who was given sugammadex for rocuronium reversal. Tryptase levels were monitored during the first postoperative 24 h, without evidence of elevation. We also performed a systematic review to provide an overview of current evidence regarding the safety of using sugammadex in patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis. The search strategy included PubMed and Google Scholar. All studies published up to and including January 2021 concerning anesthetic management in systemic mastocytosis were included. Of the 122 articles located, 9 articles were included: 2 reviews and 7 case reports. Data from reviewed studies confirm that sugammadex can safely be administered in patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis.
    Die perioperative Behandlung von Patienten mit systemischer Mastozytose ist eine Herausforderung. Die meisten Empfehlungen zur Anästhesiebehandlung von diesen Patienten basieren auf klinischen Berichten und es gibt Kontroversen über die Anwendung von Rocuronium und Sugammadex. Wir präsentieren einen Fallbericht über eine Patientin mit systemischer Mastozytose, der Sugammadex zur Rocuronium-Umkehr verabreicht wurde. Die Tryptasespiegel wurden während der ersten postoperativen 24 h überwacht, wobei keine Erhöhung dieser Tryptasespiegel beobachtet wurde. Es wurde auch ein systematisches Review durchgeführt, um einen Überblick über die aktuelle Evidenz zur Sicherheit der Anwendung von Sugammadex bei diesen Patienten zu geben. Die Suchstrategie umfasste PubMed und Google Scholar. Alle Studien zur Anästhesiebehandlung bei systemischer Mastozytose bis einschließlich Januar 2021 wurden eingeschlossen. Von den 122 gefundenen Artikeln wurden 9 Artikel aufgenommen: 2 Reviews und 7 Fallberichte. Die Daten aus überprüften Studien bestätigen, dass Sugammadex bei Patienten mit systemischer Mastozytose sicher verabreicht werden kann.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号