Muscle relaxants have broad application in anesthesiology. They can be used for safe intubation, preparing the patient for surgery, or improving mechanical ventilation. Muscle relaxants can be classified based on their mechanism of action into depolarizing and non-depolarizing muscle relaxants and centrally acting muscle relaxants. Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs) (eg, tubocurarine, atracurium, pipecuronium, mivacurium, pancuronium, rocuronium, vecuronium) act as competitive antagonists of nicotine receptors. By doing so, these drugs hinder the depolarizing effect of acetylcholine, thereby eliminating the potential stimulation of muscle fibers. Depolarizing drugs like succinylcholine and decamethonium induce an initial activation (depolarization) of the receptor followed by a sustained and steady blockade. These drugs do not act as competitive antagonists; instead, they function as more enduring agonists compared to acetylcholine itself. Many factors can influence the duration of action of these drugs. Among them, electrolyte disturbances and disruptions in acid-base balance can have an impact. Acidosis increases the potency of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, while alkalosis induces resistance to their effects. In depolarizing drugs, acidosis and alkalosis produce opposite effects. The results of studies on the impact of acid-base balance disturbances on non-depolarizing relaxants have been conflicting. This work is based on the available literature and the authors\' experience. This article aimed to review the use of anesthetic muscle relaxants in patients with acid-base disturbances.

BACKGROUND: Residual neuromuscular block is associated with increased patient morbidity. Therefore prevention of residual neuromuscular block is an important component of general anaesthesia where neuromuscular blocking agents are used. Whereas sugammadex improves reversal based on neuromuscular twitch monitoring parameters, there have been no prospective, adequately powered definitive studies demonstrating that sugammadex is also associated with less patient morbidity.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review of randomised trials comparing sugammadex with anticholinesterase-based reversal or placebo reversal that reported important patient outcomes beyond the postanaesthesia care unit.
RESULTS: We identified 43 articles, including 5839 trial participants. Only one trial reported days alive and out of hospital to 30 days (DAOH-30), which showed that the number of DAOH-30 was similar in those allocated to sugammadex compared with neostigmine-based reversal (25 days [19-27] vs 24 days [21-27], median difference 0.00 [-2.15 to 2.15]). Pooled analyses of data from 16 trials showed an estimated odds ratio (OR) for postoperative pulmonary complications of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.95) with sugammadex use. Pooled analysis showed that pneumonia (eight trials OR 0.51 [0.24-1.01] with sugammadex use), hospital length of stay (23 trials, mean difference -0.31 [-0.84 to 0.22] with sugammadex use), and patient-reported quality of recovery (11 trials, varied depending on metric used) are similar in those allocated to sugammadex vs control. The difference seen in mortality (11 trials, OR 0.39 [0.15-1.01] with sugammadex use) would be considered to be clinically significant and warrants further investigation, however, the rarity of these events precludes drawing definitive conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: Although few trials reported on DAOH-30 or important patient outcomes, sugammadex is associated with a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications, however, this might not translate to a difference in hospital length of stay, patient-reported quality of recovery, or mortality.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO database (CRD42022325858).

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Cholinesterase inhibitors, such as neostigmine and edrophonium, commonly used to reverse the residual effects of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs at the end of surgery are associated with a high rate of residual neuromuscular blockade (NMB). Due to its direct mechanism of action, sugammadex is associated with rapid and predictable reversal of deep NMB. The current analysis compares the clinical efficacy and risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) on using sugammadex or neostigmine for routine NMB reversal in adult and pediatric populations.
METHODS: PubMed and ScienceDirect were searched as the primary databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing sugammadex with neostigmine for routine NMB reversal in adult and pediatric patients have been included. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from initiation of sugammadex or neostigmine to the recovery of a time-of-four ratio (TOF) ≥ 0.9. PONV events have been reported as secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 26 studies have been included in this meta-analysis, 19 for adults with 1574 patients and 7 for children with 410 patients. Sugammadex, when compared to neostigmine, has been reported to take a shorter time to reverse NMB in adults (mean difference = -14.16 min; 95% CI [-16.88, -11.43], P < 0.01), as well as in children (mean difference = -26.36 min; 95% CI [- 40.16, -12.57], P < 0.01). Events of PONV have been found to be similar in both the groups in adults, but significantly lower in children treated with sugammadex, i.e., 7 out of 145 with sugammadex versus 35 out of 145 with neostigmine (odds ratio = 0.17; 95% CI [0.07, 0.40]).
CONCLUSIONS: Sugammadex is associated with a significantly shorter period of reversal from NMB in comparison to neostigmine in adult and pediatric patients. Regarding PONV, the use of sugammadex for NMB antagonism may offer a better option for pediatric patients.

Background and Objectives: Sugammadex is widely used in anesthesia to reverse rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade (NMB). In patients with compromised kidney function, most drugs show alteration of their pharmacokinetic profile with reduced clearance. The purpose of this article is to examine the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of sugammadex in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving general anesthesia, using a systematic review. Materials and Methods: The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, KoreaMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies comparing the efficacy or safety outcomes of sugammadex administration for the reversal of rocuronium-induced NMB, in ESRD patients (group R) or in those with normal renal function (group N) undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Results: We identified nine studies with 655 patients-six prospective, case-control studies with 179 patients (89 and 90 in groups R and N) and three retrospective observational studies with 476 ESRD patients. In the six prospective studies, the times taken to reach a train-of-four ratio ≥0.9, 0.8, and 0.7 were significantly longer in group R than in group N (weighted mean difference [95% confidence interval] [min]: 1.14 [0.29 to 2.00], 0.9 [0.24 to 1.57], 0.89 [0.20 to 1.57], respectively). The total plasma clearance of sugammadex was significantly lower in group R than in group N. There was no significant difference in the incidence of NMB recurrence and prolonged time to recovery between the groups. In the three retrospective studies, the possibility of sugammadex-related adverse events appears to be insignificant. Conclusions: Sugammadex may effectively and safely reverse rocuronium-induced NMB in patients with ESRD, although the recovery to a TOF ratio of 0.9 may be prolonged compared to patients with normal renal function. Further studies are needed, considering the small number of studies included and the high heterogeneity of some of the results.

Perioperative management in patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis is challenging. Most recommendations regarding anesthetic management in these patients are based on clinical reports, and there are controversies about the use of rocuronium and sugammadex. We present a case report of a patient with systemic mastocytosis who was given sugammadex for rocuronium reversal. Tryptase levels were monitored during the first postoperative 24 h, without evidence of elevation. We also performed a systematic review to provide an overview of current evidence regarding the safety of using sugammadex in patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis. The search strategy included PubMed and Google Scholar. All studies published up to and including January 2021 concerning anesthetic management in systemic mastocytosis were included. Of the 122 articles located, 9 articles were included: 2 reviews and 7 case reports. Data from reviewed studies confirm that sugammadex can safely be administered in patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis.
Die perioperative Behandlung von Patienten mit systemischer Mastozytose ist eine Herausforderung. Die meisten Empfehlungen zur Anästhesiebehandlung von diesen Patienten basieren auf klinischen Berichten und es gibt Kontroversen über die Anwendung von Rocuronium und Sugammadex. Wir präsentieren einen Fallbericht über eine Patientin mit systemischer Mastozytose, der Sugammadex zur Rocuronium-Umkehr verabreicht wurde. Die Tryptasespiegel wurden während der ersten postoperativen 24 h überwacht, wobei keine Erhöhung dieser Tryptasespiegel beobachtet wurde. Es wurde auch ein systematisches Review durchgeführt, um einen Überblick über die aktuelle Evidenz zur Sicherheit der Anwendung von Sugammadex bei diesen Patienten zu geben. Die Suchstrategie umfasste PubMed und Google Scholar. Alle Studien zur Anästhesiebehandlung bei systemischer Mastozytose bis einschließlich Januar 2021 wurden eingeschlossen. Von den 122 gefundenen Artikeln wurden 9 Artikel aufgenommen: 2 Reviews und 7 Fallberichte. Die Daten aus überprüften Studien bestätigen, dass Sugammadex bei Patienten mit systemischer Mastozytose sicher verabreicht werden kann.

BACKGROUND: There have been conflicting results regarding clinical dexamethasone-sugammadex interactions in adults and pediatric patients under general anesthesia.
METHODS: This study used a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies based on the Cochrane Review Methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials that investigated the effect of dexamethasone on sugammadex reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia.
RESULTS: Among the 314 patients in the 6 studies, 147 received intravenous dexamethasone (dexamethasone group), and 167 received intravenous saline or other antiemetics (control group). The primary outcome, the time to recovery after sugammadex administration (the time to recovery of the train-of-four ratio to 0.9 after sugammadex administration; s) was comparable between the 2 groups, the weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval [CI]) being -2.93 (-36.19, 30.33) (I2 = 94%). The time to extubation after sugammadex administration (s) and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was not different between the 2 groups, the weighted mean difference (95% CI) being 23.31 (-2.26, 48.88) (I2 = 86%) and the pooled risk ratio (95% CI) being 0.25 (0.03, 2.11), respectively. The time to recovery after sugammadex administration might be different according to the study design or study region.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that use of dexamethasone in the perioperative period neither delayed nor facilitated the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex in patients undergoing elective surgery with general anesthesia. However, given that the results showed high heterogeneity, further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Serotonin syndrome is a potentially life-threatening condition associated with increased serotonergic activity in the central nervous system. The increasing incidence of this condition is thought to parallel the increasing use of serotonergic agents in medical practice. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are perhaps the most commonly implicated group of medications associated with serotonin syndrome. This case report describes the occurrence of postoperative serotonin syndrome in a patient on long-term sertraline who underwent coronary artery bypass graft and was treated with methylene blue for perioperative vasoplegia. It delineates the various clinical features commonly encountered and illustrates the recommended management modalities, including prevention, for this potentially lethal medical emergency. With prompt diagnosis and expeditious treatment, the patient has had full recovery.

Rocuronium-associated injection pain/withdrawal response (RAIPWR) was non-ideal but occurred frequently when injection intravenously during anesthesia induction. Many studies had reported that pretreating with antipyretic analgesics (AAs) could reduce the occurrence of RAIPWR, but there was no consensus yet. Therefore, this meta-analysis was designed to systematically evaluate the benefits of AAs on RAIPWR in patients.
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, EMbase, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data were searched by January 1st 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) applying AAs to alleviate RAIPWR in patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia. Two investigators assessed quality of RCTs and extracted data respectively and the meta-analysis was carried on Revman 5.3 software. Moreover, we compared AAs in pros and cons directly with lidocaine, the most reported medicine to prevent RAIPWR.
Data were analyzed from 9 RCTs totaling 819 patients. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared to the control group, pretreating with AAs could prevent the total occurrence of RAIPWR [Risk ratio (RR), 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42 to 0.66; P < 0.0001], and took effect on moderate (RR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P < 0.0001) and severe RAIPWR (RR = 0.14; 95%CI, 0.08 to 0.24; P < 0.00001). When compared to lidocaine, the preventive effect was not so excellent as the latter but injection pain induced by prophylactic occurred less.
The currently available evidence suggested that pretreating with AAs intravenously could alleviate RAIPWR.
PROSPERO CRD42019129776.

Rocuronium is a muscle relaxant with increased use due to its binding relation with the reversal agent sugammadex. The purpose of this review entails the investigation of its use for the maintenance of Deep Neuromuscular Block (NMB) via continuous infusion.
Based on PRISMA systematic search guidelines, databases included PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. This comprehensive search addresses surgical patients under deep muscle relaxation via continuous rocuronium infusion. The main indicators were the rocuronium administration, NMB monitoring approaches and effects in order to maintain the deep level of relaxation, as well as reversal time after a standard dose of sugammadex.
Despite the variance in approaches found in the literature, findings show the overall maintenance of deep NMB requires approximately 0.758 mg.kg-1h-1 of rocuronium (according to the PTC target of 0-10, 0-5 and 1-2, mean estimates are 0.445, 0.65 and 0.833 mg.kg-1h-1 respectively), suggesting that a lower range and a smaller maximum of PTC response require higher amount of rocuronium for its maintenance. The standard dose of sugammadex (4 mg/kg), administered at the end of the surgery takes longer [2.85 (1.17) min] than when they are administered after moderate NMB recovery [1.68 (0.47) min].
Continuous infusion for deep NMB presents inherent advantages in terms of maintenance and stability of muscle relaxation. Monitoring and rocuronium administration approaches are fundamental and intrinsically connected to provide a stable and improved maintenance of deep NMB.