Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents

神经肌肉非去极化剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:残余神经肌肉阻滞与术后肺部并发症有关。这项研究旨在确定sugammadex是否与新斯的明相比,术后肺部并发症(PPC)的风险较低。
    方法:本回顾性队列研究在三级学术医疗中心进行。在2019年1月至2021年9月期间,纳入年龄≥18岁的患者接受全身麻醉和机械通气的非心脏手术。我们通过电子病历审查确定了所有接受罗库溴铵和新斯的明或Sugammadex逆转的患者。主要终点是PPC的复合物(包括肺炎,肺不张,呼吸衰竭,肺栓塞,胸腔积液,或气胸)。使用倾向评分分析比较PPC的发生率。
    结果:本研究共纳入1786例患者。在这些患者中,976人(54.6%)接受了新斯的明,810人(45.4%)收到sugammadex。在整个样本中,PPC发生在81名(4.54%)受试者中(7.04%sugammadexvs.2.46%新斯的明)。重叠加权后,基线协变量在组间平衡良好。sugammadex组的患者与新斯的明相比具有相似的风险(重叠加权OR:0.75;95%CI:0.40至1.41)。敏感性分析结果一致。在亚组分析中,按手术时间分层的逆转剂的交互作用P值为0.011.
    结论:与新斯的明相比,当神经肌肉阻滞逆转时,PPC的比率没有显着差异。接受长时间手术的患者可能会受益于sugammadex,这需要进一步调查。
    OBJECTIVE: Residual neuromuscular blockade has been linked to pulmonary complications in the postoperative period. This study aimed to determine whether sugammadex was associated with a lower risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) compared with neostigmine.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients ≥18 year of age undergoing noncardiac surgical procedures with general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation were enrolled between January 2019 and September 2021. We identified all patients receiving rocuronium and reversal with neostigmine or sugammadex via electronic medical record review. The primary endpoint was a composite of PPCs (including pneumonia, atelectasis, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax). The incidence of PPCs was compared using propensity score analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 1786 patients were included in this study. Among these patients, 976 (54.6%) received neostigmine, and 810 (45.4%) received sugammadex. In the whole sample, PPCs occurred in 81 (4.54%) subjects (7.04% sugammadex vs. 2.46% neostigmine). Baseline covariates were well balanced between groups after overlap weighting. Patients in the sugammadex group had similar risk (overlap weighting OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.41) compared to neostigmine. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results. In subgroup analysis, the interaction P-value for the reversal agents stratified by surgery duration was 0.011.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the rate of PPCs when the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with sugammadex compared to neostigmine. Patients undergoing prolonged surgery may benefit from sugammadex, which needs to be further investigated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    通过等温滴定量热法和1HNMR光谱法在磷酸盐缓冲盐水中测量柱[6]MaxQ对一组神经肌肉阻断剂和神经递质的结合亲和力。体内功效研究表明,P6MQ螯合了罗库溴铵和维库溴铵,并逆转了它们对四组(TOF)比率恢复的影响。
    The binding affinity of pillar[6]MaxQ toward a panel of neuromuscular blockers and neurotransmitters was measured in phosphate buffered saline by isothermal titration calorimetry and 1H NMR spectroscopy. In vivo efficacy studies showed that P6MQ sequesters rocuronium and vecuronium and reverses their influence on the recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在腹腔镜手术中常规使用神经肌肉阻断剂以优化手术条件。我们比较了深度和中度神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)对接受腹腔镜大手术的儿童的手术条件和术后结局的影响。
    方法:将60名年龄在2-14岁接受腹腔镜大手术的儿童随机分为深度(强直后1-2次抽搐)或中度(4次1-2次抽搐)NMB组。用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼维持麻醉,并且用罗库溴铵连续输注维持NMB。手术结束时,NMB被sugammadex拮抗。腹内压,气道压力,莱顿外科评定量表,术中血流动力学,药物用法,手术持续时间,术后恢复时间,疼痛,比较两组患者的并发症情况。
    结果:最大和平均腹内压,峰值吸气压力,深度NMB组的平均气道压力显著低于中度NMB组(p<0.001)。Leiden手术评定量表和罗库溴铵用量在深NMB组明显高于中度NMB组(p<0.001)。术中血流动力学,手术持续时间,术后恢复时间,疼痛,两组间并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
    结论:在接受大型腹腔镜手术的儿童中,与sugamadex逆转的中度NMB相比,深度NMB提供了更好的手术条件和相似的恢复情况。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,不。ChiCTR2100053821。
    OBJECTIVE: Neuromuscular blocking agents are routinely used in laparoscopic surgery to optimize operative conditions. We compared the effect of a deep and moderate neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgical conditions and postoperative outcomes in children undergoing major laparoscopic surgery.
    METHODS: Sixty children aged 2-14 years scheduled to undergo major laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to deep (post-tetanic count 1-2 twitches) or moderate (train-of-four 1-2 twitches) NMB groups. The anesthesia was maintained with propofol and remifentanil, and the NMB was maintained with a rocuronium continuous infusion. At the end of the operation, the NMB were antagonized with sugammadex. The intra-abdominal pressure, airway pressure, Leiden Surgical Rating Scale, intraoperative hemodynamics, drug usages, duration of surgery, postoperative recovery time, pain, and complications were compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: The maximum and mean intra-abdominal pressure, the peak inspiratory pressure, and mean airway pressure were significantly lower in the deep NMB group than in the moderate NMB group (p < 0.001). The Leiden Surgical Rating Scale and the dosage of rocuronium were significantly higher in the deep NMB group than the moderate NMB group (p < 0.001). The intraoperative hemodynamics, duration of surgery, post-operative recovery time, pain, and the incidence rate of complications were not significantly different between the groups (p > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: A deep NMB provided better operative conditions and similar recovery profiles compared with a moderate NMB as reversed with sugammadex in children undergoing major laparoscopic surgery.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2100053821.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    选择性松弛剂结合剂(SRBA)在临床手术中具有精确逆转神经肌肉阻滞的巨大潜力。了解SRBA的结构亲和力逆转效应与神经肌肉阻滞之间的关系对于设计新的SRBA至关重要。这很少被探索。设计了七个具有不同脂肪链和两个边缘的阴离子基团的阴离子柱[5]芳烃(AP5As)。使用1HNMR研究了它们与神经肌肉阻断剂decamonium溴化物(DMBr)的结合亲和力,等温滴定量热法(ITC),和理论计算。结果表明,AP5As对DMBr的捕获主要是由静电相互作用驱动的,离子-偶极相互作用和C-H‧‧π相互作用。羧酸盐AP5As和DMBr之间的最佳尺寸匹配为~0.80。结合亲和力随着AP5As电荷量的增加而增加。进一步的动物实验表明,逆转效率随着对羧酸盐或膦酸盐AP5A的结合亲和力的增加而增加。然而,膦酸酯AP5As的逆转效率低于羧酸酯AP5As,尽管与DMBR有更强的亲和力。通过理解结构-亲和力-反转关系,这项研究为设计用于逆转神经肌肉阻滞的创新SRBA提供了有价值的见解。
    Selective relaxant binding agents (SRBA) have great potential in clinical surgeries for the precise reversal of neuromuscular blockades. Understanding the relationship between the structure-affinity-reversal effects of SRBA and neuromuscular blockade is crucial for the design of new SRBAs, which has rarely been explored. Seven anionic pillar[5]arenes (AP5As) with different aliphatic chains and anionic groups at both edges were designed. Their binding affinities to the neuromuscular blocking agent decamonium bromide (DMBr) were investigated using 1H NMR, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and theoretical calculations. The results indicate that the capture of DMBr by AP5As is primarily driven by electrostatic interactions, ion-dipole interactions and C-H‧‧‧π interactions. The optimal size matching between the carboxylate AP5As and DMBr was ∼0.80. The binding affinity increased with an increase in the charge quantity of AP5As. Further animal experiments indicated that the reversal efficiency increased with increasing binding affinity for carboxylate or phosphonate AP5As. However, phosphonate AP5As exhibited lower reversal efficiencies than carboxylate AP5As, despite having stronger affinities with DMBr. By understanding the structure-affinity-reversal relationships, this study provides valuable insights into the design of innovative SRBAs for reversing neuromuscular blockade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    高体脂百分比患者的药效学可能与肥胖患者相似。这项随机对照临床试验观察了罗库溴铵对不同体脂百分比(PBFs)患者的影响。本研究纳入了在上海市总医院进行全身麻醉下择期泌尿外科或盆腔手术的54例患者;纳入了51例患者进行数据分析。PBF正常(<25%)的患者根据总体重(N-TBW,对照组)。PBF较高(≥25%)的患者根据总体重(H-TBW)计算单剂量的罗库溴铵。PBF和罗库溴铵较高的患者根据无脂质量(H-FFM)给药。一组四个(TOF)-观察加速度描记器用于测量罗库溴铵的作用。H-TBW(91.9±28.8s)的起效时间明显短于N-TBW和H-FFM(p=0.003)。H-TBW的临床持续时间和药理持续时间明显长于其他组(p=0.000和0.000);三组的TOF比值0.25-0.9时间差异有统计学意义(p=0.005)。三组间恢复时间(p=0.103)和恢复指数(p=0.159)差异无统计学意义。基于FFM的罗库溴铵对高PBF患者的影响与正常患者相似。基于TBW计算的单剂量罗库溴铵可能会缩短起效时间,延长临床和药理持续时间,并延长恢复时间。
    The pharmacodynamics in patients with high body fat percentage might be similar to those in obese patients. This randomised controlled clinical trial observed the effects of rocuronium in patients with different percent body fats (PBFs). Fifty-four patients who underwent elective urological or pelvic surgery under general anaesthesia at Shanghai General Hospital were included in the present study; 51 patients were included for data analysis. Patients with normal PBF (<25%) were given a single dose of rocuronium calculated based on total body weight (N-TBW, control group). Patients with a higher PBF (≥25%) were given a single dose of rocuronium calculated based on total body weight (H-TBW). Patients with higher PBF and rocuronium were dosed based on fat-free mass (H-FFM). A train of four (TOF)-Watch acceleromyography monitor was used to measure the effects of the rocuronium. H-TBW (91.9 ± 28.8 s) had significantly shorter onset time than N-TBW and H-FFM (p = 0.003). H-TBW had significantly longer clinical duration time and pharmacological duration time than the other groups (p = 0.000 and 0.000, respectively); the TOF ratio0.25-0.9 time was significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in the recovery time (p = 0.103) or recovery index (p = 0.159) among the three groups. The effects of rocuronium dosed based on FFM in patients with high PBFs are similar to those in normal patients. A single dose of rocuronium calculated based on TBW might shorten the onset time, prolong the clinical and pharmacological duration times, and prolong the recovery time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:adamgammadex的初步临床试验,一种新型的基于环糊精的选择性逆转剂,已证明其在逆转罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞中的功效。
    方法:这个多中心,随机化,双盲,阳性对照,非劣效性III期临床试验比较了adamgammadex和sugammadex的疗效和安全性。我们随机分配了310名受试者,以在四人组(TOF)的第二次抽搐出现时接受adamgammadex(4mgkg-1)或sugammadex(2mgkg-1),并收集标准安全性数据.
    结果:对于主要结果,在adamgammadex组中,5分钟内TOF比率≥0.9的患者比例为98.7%,在sugammadex组中为100%,点估计和95%置信区间(CI)为1.3%(-4.6%,+1.3%);下限大于-10%的非劣效性边缘。对于关键的次要结果,从开始服用adamgammadex或sugammadex到TOF比率恢复到0.9的中位数(四分位数间)时间为2.25(1.75,2.75)min和1.75(1.50,2.00)min,分别。差异为0.50(95%CI:0.25,0.50);上限低于5分钟的非劣效性边缘。此外,在次要结局中未观察到较差的结果.与sugammadex相比,Adamgammadex的药物不良反应发生率较低(过敏反应,递归,心率下降,和喉痉挛;P=0.047)。
    结论:Adamgammadex不劣于sugammadex,与sugammadex相比,药物不良反应的发生率可能更低。Adamgammadex在其整体风险收益方面可能具有潜在优势。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2000039525。2020年10月30日注册。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=56825。
    BACKGROUND: Preliminary clinical trials of adamgammadex, a new cyclodextrin-based selective reversal agent, have demonstrated its efficacy in reversing neuromuscular block by rocuronium.
    METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, positive-controlled, non-inferiority phase III clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adamgammadex and sugammadex. We randomised 310 subjects to receive adamgammadex (4 mg kg-1) or sugammadex (2 mg kg-1) at reappearance of the second twitch of the train-of-four (TOF), and standard safety data were collected.
    RESULTS: For the primary outcome, the proportion of patients with TOF ratio ≥0.9 within 5 min was 98.7% in the adamgammadex group vs 100% in the sugammadex group, with a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.3% (-4.6%, +1.3%); the lower limit was greater than the non-inferiority margin of -10%. For the key secondary outcome, the median (inter quartile range) time from the start of administration of adamgammadex or sugammadex to recovery of TOF ratio to 0.9 was 2.25 (1.75, 2.75) min and 1.75 (1.50, 2.00) min, respectively. The difference was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.50); the upper limit was lower than the non-inferiority margin of 5 min. In addition, there were no inferior results observed in secondary outcomes. Adamgammadex had a lower incidence of adverse drug reactions compared with sugammadex (anaphylactic reaction, recurarisation, decreased heart rate, and laryngospasm; P=0.047).
    CONCLUSIONS: Adamgammadex was non-inferior to sugammadex with a possible lower incidence of adverse drug reactions compared with sugammadex. Adamgammadex may have a potential advantage in terms of its overall risk-benefit profile.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000039525. Registered October 30, 2020. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=56825.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:使用神经肌肉阻滞剂后残留的神经肌肉阻滞是全身麻醉的常见且潜在有害的并发症。新斯的明是一种广泛使用的拮抗剂,但其对老年患者的最佳剂量尚不清楚。
    目的:比较新斯的明逆转老年患者顺式阿曲库铵诱导神经肌肉阻滞后浅残留阻滞的最佳剂量和安全性。
    方法:对196例老年患者在顺式阿曲库铵全身麻醉下进行非心脏手术。患者被分配为不接受新斯的明(对照组)或20µg/kg的新斯的明,手术结束时,四组(TOF)比率达到0.2时,为40µg/kg或50µg/kg。主要结果是给药后达到0.9的TOF比率的时间。次要结果包括给药后10分钟的TOF比率,术后恶心呕吐,术后认知障碍和麻醉后监护病房(PACU)停留时间。
    结果:在20µg/kg中达到0.9的TOF比率的时间,40µg/kg和50µg/kg组明显短于对照组(H=104.257,P<0.01),40µg/kg组和50µg/kg组的时间明显短于20µg/kg组(P<0.001)。40µg/kg和50µg/kg组之间没有显着差异(P=0.249)。给药后10分钟的TOF比率显示出相似的结果。术后恶心呕吐组间差异无统计学意义,术后认知障碍或术后住院时间。
    结论:老年患者全身麻醉后及时使用新斯的明可明显缩短TOF值达到0.9的时间,其中40µg/kg剂量可能是更优化的选择。
    背景:这项研究已在chictr.org上注册。cn(ChiCTR2100054685,2021年12月24日)。
    Residual neuromuscular block after using neuromuscular blocking agents is a common and potentially harmful complication of general anesthesia. Neostigmine is a widely used antagonist, but its optimal dose for elderly patients is unclear.
    To compare the optimal dosage and safety of neostigmine for reversing shallow residual block in elderly patients after cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block.
    A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 196 elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia with cisatracurium. Patients were assigned to receive either no neostigmine (control group) or neostigmine at 20 µg/kg, 40 µg/kg or 50 µg/kg when train-of-four (TOF) ratio reached 0.2 at the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the time to reach TOF ratio of 0.9 after administration. Secondary outcomes included TOF ratio at 10 min after administration, postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative cognitive impairment and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay time.
    The time to reach TOF ratio of 0.9 in the 20 µg/kg, 40 µg/kg and 50 µg/kg groups was significantly shorter than the control group (H = 104.257, P < 0.01), and the time of 40 µg/kg group and 50 µg/kg group was significantly shorter than the 20 µg/kg group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between 40 µg/kg and 50 µg/kg groups (P = 0.249). The TOF ratio at 10 min after administration showed similar results. There were no significant differences among groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, postoperative cognitive impairment or post-operation hospital stay.
    Timely use of neostigmine after general anesthesia in elderly patients can significantly shorten time of TOF value reaching 0.9, among which 40 µg/kg dosage may be a more optimized choice.
    this study was registered on chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100054685, 24/12/2021).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景技术胰肾联合移植(SPK)是一项耗时且重要的外科手术,这可以提供达到正常血糖的生理手段,并使患者无需透析。sugammadex的潜在临床益处包括快速和可预测的反向神经肌肉阻滞(NMB),但是sugammadex是否影响SPK移植物的功能尚不确定。材料与方法研究了48例患者,并用sugamadex(n=24)或新斯的明(n=24)逆转了深NMB。安全性变量包括血清肌酐(Scr),肌酐清除率(CCr),血清淀粉酶(AMS),血糖(Glu),平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR)次要结果是从预定时间给予sugamadex/新斯的明到TOF比率恢复到0.7和0.9的时间,以及急性肺部并发症。结果T2-6时Scr明显低于T0-1时(P<0.01),CCr较高(P<0.05)。在两组之间,Scr,CCr,与AMS在相同时间点相似(P>0.05)。MAP,HR,T1时S组Glu高于N组(P<0.05)。S组TOF=0.7的恢复时间为3(2.4-4.2)min,N组为12.1(10.2-15.9)min(P<0.001),S组至TOFr≥0.9的恢复时间为4.8(3.6-7.1)min,S组为23.5(19.8-30.8)。与N组相比,S组急性肺部并发症的风险较低:补充氧需求0vs4(16.7%),肺不张0比2(0.83%),肺炎1(4.2%)对3(12.5%),低氧血症1(4.2%)vs4(16.7%)。结论Sugammadex给药对SPK移植受体是安全有效的。
    BACKGROUND Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is a time-consuming and important surgical procedure, which can provide a physiological mean of achieving normoglycemia and render patients free of dialysis. The potential clinical benefits of sugammadex include fast and predictable reverse deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB), but whether sugammadex affects the function of SPK grafts is uncertain. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-eight patients were studied and reversed deep NMB with either sugammadex (n=24) or neostigmine (n=24). The safety variables included serum creatinine (Scr), creatinine clearance rate (CCr), serum amylase (AMS), blood glucose (Glu), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). Secondary outcomes were time from administration of sugammadex/neostigmine at the scheduled time to recovery of a TOF ratio to 0.7 and 0.9, and post-acute pulmonary complications. RESULTS Scr at T2-6 was significantly lower than that at T0-1 (P<0.01), while CCr was higher (P<0.05). Between the 2 groups, Scr, CCr, and AMS were similar at the same timepoints (P>0.05). MAP, HR, and Glu were higher in group S than in group N at T1 (P<0.05). The recovery time of TOF=0.7 was 3 (2.4-4.2) min for group S and 12.1 (10.2-15.9) min for group N (P<0.001), and recovery time to TOFr ≥0.9 was 4.8 (3.6-7.1) min for group S and 23.5 (19.8-30.8) in group S. Compared to group N, group S had lower risk for post-acute pulmonary complications: supplemental oxygen requirements 0 vs 4 (16.7%), pulmonary atelectasis 0 vs 2 (0.83%), pneumonia 1 (4.2%) vs 3 (12.5%), and hypoxemia 1 (4.2%) vs 4 (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS Sugammadex administration is safe and effective for SPK transplantation recipients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:Sugammadex是一种用于快速可靠逆转神经肌肉阻滞的新型药物。这项研究评估了sugammadex是否可以减少腹部手术患者的术后住院时间。
    方法:这项单中心回顾性队列研究包括2015年1月至2019年10月接受腹部大手术的患者。根据sugammadex逆转或自发恢复对患者进行随机分组。主要结果是术后住院时间。次要结果是麻醉后护理单元(PACU)住院时间,术后下床时间,第一次排便时间,和肺部并发症的发生率。1:1倾向评分匹配后,单变量和多元线性回归分析估计了结果的差异.
    结果:在1614名患者中,517接受sugammadex,645自发回收。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,在Sugammadex的给药与术后住院时间之间检测到非线性关系(β=0.2995%置信区间{CI}:[-1.13,-0.54],P=0.4912)。然而,它与较短的PACU停留时间相关(β=-20.3095%CI:[-24.48,-17.11],P<0.0001),术后下床活动时间较短(β=-0.4395%CI:[-0.62,-0.23],P<0.0001),减少首次排便时间(β=-2.2595%CI:[-0.45,-0.05],P=0.0129),与自发恢复组相比。sugammadex组的肺炎发生率明显低于自发恢复组(18.6%[44/237]vs.39.2%[93/237]P<0.05)。
    结论:腹部手术后使用sugamadex逆转神经肌肉阻滞显示出良好的恢复情况,并与肺炎风险降低相关。虽然不影响术后住院时间。
    Sugammadex is a newer medication used for rapid and reliable reversal of neuromuscular blockade. This study evaluated whether sugammadex could reduce the length of postoperative hospital stay in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
    This single center retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent major abdominal surgery between January 2015 and October 2019. Patients were randomized according to reversal with sugammadex or spontaneous recovery. The primary outcome was length of postoperative hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were length of post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) stay, postoperative ambulation time, time-to-first-defecation, and incidence of pulmonary complications. After 1:1 propensity score matching, univariate and multiple linear regression analyses estimated the differences in outcomes.
    Of the 1614 patients, 517 received sugammadex and 645 spontaneously recovered. After adjusting for potential confounders, non-linear relationship was detected between administration of sugammadex and the length of postoperative hospital stay (β = 0.29 95% confidence interval {CI}: [- 1.13, - 0.54], P = 0.4912). However, it was associated with shorter PACU stay (β = - 20.30 95% CI: [- 24.48, - 17.11], P < 0.0001), shorter time to postoperative ambulation movement (β = - 0.43 95% CI: [- 0.62, - 0.23], P < 0.0001), and reduced time-to-first-defecation (β = - 2.25 95% CI: [- 0.45, - 0.05], P = 0.0129), when compared to the spontaneously recovered group. The incidence of pneumonia in the sugammadex group was significantly lower than that in the spontaneously recovered group (18.6% [44/237] vs. 39.2% [93/237] P < 0.05).
    Neuromuscular blockade reversal with sugammadex after abdominal surgery demonstrated an excellent recovery profile and was associated with decreased risk of pneumonia, although it did not affect the length of postoperative hospital stay.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    广谱剂对于逆转神经肌肉阻断剂诱导的残余curarization具有重要意义。这里,我们报道了一种高水溶性葫芦[8]脲(CB[8])衍生物,作为一种广谱神经肌肉阻滞逆转剂,其由苄基半烯啉和氨基类固醇神经肌肉阻滞剂通过超分子螯合策略诱导.UV/Vis竞争滴定试验表明,CB[8]衍生物对苄烯醇型顺式阿曲库铵和氨基类固醇型罗库溴铵的高结合亲和力,维库溴铵,和潘库溴铵,在107M-1的水平。体内研究表明,与安慰剂或新斯的明组相比,CB[8]衍生物的给药可以显着加快恢复时间。CB[8]衍生物的逆转活性与临床批准的sugammadex相当或更高。急性毒性评估表明,CB[8]-衍生物表现出优异的生物相容性,最大耐受剂量高达960mgkg-1。
    Broad-spectrum agents for the reversal of residual curarization induced by neuromuscular blocking agents are of great significance. Here, we report a highly water-soluble cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) derivative as a broad-spectrum neuromuscular block reversal agent induced by both benzylisquinolinium and aminosteroid neuromuscular block agents by the supramolecular sequestration strategy. The UV/Vis competition titration assays suggest the high binding affinity of the CB[8] derivative toward both benzylisquinolinium-type cisatracurium besylate and aminosteroid-type rocuronium, vecuronium, and pancuronium, at the level of 107 M-1. In vivo studies demonstrate that the administration of the CB[8] derivative could significantly accelerate the recovery time compared to the placebo or neostigmine groups. The reversal activity of the CB[8] derivative is comparable to or higher than that of clinically approved sugammadex. Acute toxicity evaluations reveal that the CB[8]-derivative displays outstanding biocompatibility, with the maximum tolerance dose as high as 960 mg kg-1.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号