Nasal Sprays

鼻腔喷雾剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Zavegepant是一种新型gepant,在美国以10mg剂量批准的鼻喷雾剂,用于成人有或没有先兆的偏头痛的急性治疗。在健康参与者的单次递增剂量(SAD)和多次递增剂量(MAD)研究中评估了zavegepant鼻喷雾剂的心血管安全性。SAD研究包括72名参与者(54名活跃/18名安慰剂),他们接受了0.1-40mgzavegepant或安慰剂。MAD研究包括72名参与者(56名活跃/16名安慰剂),他们接受5-40mgzavegepant或安慰剂1-14天。血浆zavegepant药代动力学和心电图(ECG)参数(Fridericia校正的QT间期[QTcF],心率,PR间隔,心室去极化[QRS],T波形态,和U波存在)在zavegepant给药前后进行分析。使用来自SAD和MAD研究的汇总数据,使用线性混合效应模型评估了时间匹配的血浆zavegepant浓度与QTc间期之间的关系,以评估QTc间期延长的可能性.结果表明,与安慰剂相比,单剂量和多剂量的zavegepant对ECG参数没有显着影响,对QTcF间期无浓度依赖性影响。血浆zavegepant浓度-QTcF模型的估计斜率为-0.053ms/ng/mL,90%置信区间为-0.0955至-0.0110(p=0.0415),这在临床上没有意义。剂量高达推荐每日剂量的四倍,zavegepant不会将QT间期延长至任何临床相关程度。
    Zavegepant is a novel gepant administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States at a 10 mg dose for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The cardiovascular safety of zavegepant nasal spray was assessed in both single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies in healthy participants. The SAD study included 72 participants (54 active/18 placebo) who received 0.1-40 mg zavegepant or placebo. The MAD study included 72 participants (56 active/16 placebo) who received 5-40 mg zavegepant or placebo for 1-14 days. Plasma zavegepant pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF], heart rate, PR interval, ventricular depolarization [QRS], T-wave morphology, and U-wave presence) were analyzed pre- and post-zavegepant administration. Using pooled data from the SAD and MAD studies, the relationship between time-matched plasma zavegepant concentrations and QTc interval was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the potential for QTc interval prolongation. Results showed that single and multiple doses of zavegepant had no significant impact on ECG parameters versus placebo, and there was no concentration-dependent effect on QTcF interval. The estimated slope of the plasma zavegepant concentration-QTcF model was -0.053 ms per ng/mL with a 90% confidence interval of -0.0955 to -0.0110 (p = 0.0415), which is not considered clinically meaningful. At doses up to four times the recommended daily dose, zavegepant does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项III期随机双盲对照试验的目的是研究在芝麻油(RG)鼻喷雾剂中使用玫瑰天竺葵与等渗盐水(IS)鼻喷雾剂对缓解化疗患者鼻前庭炎症状的疗效。
    方法:接受主动化疗并报告相关鼻部症状的患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受RG或IS,每天两次,持续2周。同意的参与者在基线时完成鼻部症状问卷,然后在治疗期间每周完成一次。开始鼻腔喷雾2周后鼻部症状改善的患者比例,使用六点的全球变化分数,在每个随机分组内和之间进行估计,和武器之间的比较,使用费希尔的精确检验。确定估计的比值比(95%置信区间)。
    结果:106名患者同意这项研究;RG组的43名参与者和IS组的41名参与者可评估主要终点。参与者的平均年龄为57.8岁(SD13.9)。两组之间的人口统计学特征和基线鼻部症状相似。在接受RG的可评估参与者中,67.4%报告鼻腔症状改善,与36.6%接受IS的参与者相比(P=0.009)。不良事件很少,两组之间没有差异。
    结论:芝麻油中的玫瑰天竺葵可显著改善化疗患者的鼻前庭炎症状。
    背景:NCT04620369。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this phase III randomized double-blinded controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of a rose geranium in sesame oil (RG) nasal spray compared with an isotonic saline (IS) nasal spray for alleviating nasal vestibulitis symptoms among patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    METHODS: Patients undergoing active chemotherapy who reported associated nasal symptoms were randomized 1:1 to receive RG or IS, administered twice daily for 2 weeks. Consenting participants completed nasal symptom questionnaires at baseline and then weekly while on treatment. The proportion of patients experiencing improvements in their nasal symptoms 2 weeks after initiating the nasal spray, using a six-point global impression of change score, was estimated within and between each randomized arm, and compared between arms, using Fisher\'s exact test. The estimated odds ratio was determined (95% confidence interval).
    RESULTS: One hundred and six patients consented to this study; 43 participants in the RG arm and 41 in the IS arm were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Participants had a mean age of 57.8 years (SD 13.9). Demographic characteristics and baseline nasal symptoms were similar between arms. Of the evaluable participants who received RG, 67.4% reported improved nasal symptoms, compared with 36.6% of the participants who received IS (P = 0.009). Adverse events were sparse and did not differ between arms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rose geranium in sesame oil significantly improves nasal vestibulitis symptoms among patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04620369.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    阿米洛利是美国食品和药物管理局批准的利尿剂,用于治疗高血压和充血性心力衰竭。最近的人类和动物研究表明,阿米洛利还可能通过其酸敏感离子通道拮抗作用在治疗焦虑症中发挥作用。通过临时复合制剂鼻内施用阿米洛利鼻喷雾剂具有快速递送至作用部位以在患有焦虑症的个体患者中实现治疗结果的潜力。然而,这些患者特异性制剂不具有制剂前的特征,包括化学稳定性,传统制造的剂型。这项研究的目的是评估复合阿米洛利鼻喷雾剂在6个月和12个月内利用高热加速降解和阿伦尼乌斯方程的估计化学稳定性。在12个月的时间内,以适当的间隔采用了指示稳定性的高效液相色谱分析方法,以揭示阿米洛利在测试期间和通过外推法保持化学稳定。物理稳定性和与防腐剂苯甲醇的相容性也通过目视检查证实。pH监测,和浊度的测量。
    Amiloride is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved diuretic agent used to treat hypertension and congestive heart failure. Recent human and animal studies have suggested that amiloride may also have a role in treating anxiety through its acid-sensing ion channel antagonism. Intranasal administration of amiloride nasal spray via an extemporaneously compounded preparation has the potential for rapid delivery to the site of action to achieve therapeutic outcomes in individual patients with anxiety disorders. However, these patient-specific preparations do not have the pre-formulation characterization, including chemical stability, that conventional manufactured dosage forms have. The objective of this study was to assess the estimated chemical stability of compounded amiloride nasal spray over 6 months and 12 months utilizing accelerated degradation with high heat and the Arrhenius equation. A stability-indicating highperformance liquid chromatography analytical method was employed at appropriate intervals over a 12-month period to reveal that amiloride remained chemically stable over the period tested and by extrapolation. Physical stability and compatibility with the preservative benzyl alcohol were also confirmed via visual inspection, pH monitoring, and measurement of turbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗性液体和疫苗的鼻给药用于治疗过敏性鼻炎,鼻窦炎,拥塞,冠状病毒甚至阿尔茨海默病。在后者中,药物必须到达嗅觉区域,所以它进入了中枢神经系统。由于鼻腔的曲折解剖结构,能够到达嗅觉区域的有效给药技术具有挑战性。并且经常使用透明解剖模型在体外进行评估。这里,3D打印人鼻腔内的液体分布被量化为模型流体,该模型流体是由带有喷雾生成喷嘴的1-mL注射器排出而产生的,和发射准直流体流的直尖端。使用两种具有不同粘度的模型流体的实验表明,正确定位的直尖端连接到注射器能够有效地输送大部分的治疗流体在人体嗅觉区域在侧躺位置,避免采用头靠和头靠下的位置,这对于典型的阿尔茨海默病年龄范围内的患者来说是困难的。此外,我们通过计算机模拟证明了结论在很宽的参数范围内是有效的。
    The nasal administration of therapeutic fluids and vaccines is used to treat allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, congestion, coronaviruses and even Alzheimer\'s disease. In the latter, the drug must reach the olfactory region, so it finds its way into the central nervous system. Effective administration techniques able to reach the olfactory region are challenging due to the tortuous anatomy of the nasal cavity, and are frequently evaluated in vitro using transparent anatomical models. Here, the liquid distribution inside a 3D printed human nasal cavity is quantified for model fluids resulting from the discharge of a 1-mL syringe with either a spray-generating nozzle, and a straight tip emitting a collimated fluid stream. Experiments using two model fluids with different viscosities suggest that a simple, correctly positioned straight tip attached to a syringe is able to efficiently deliver most of a therapeutic fluid in the human olfactory region in the side-laying position, avoiding the adoption of head-back and head-down positions that can be difficult for patients in the age range typical of Alzheimer\'s disease. Furthermore, we demonstrate by computer simulations that the conclusion is valid within a wide range of parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在风险评估和缓解战略计划下,esketamine鼻喷雾剂CIII需要在认证的治疗中心自我给药。我们的目的是确定与艾氯胺酮开始和持续相关的因素。
    方法:在符合难治性抑郁症(TRD)标准的美国成年人中进行了一项回顾性观察性队列研究。病例(n=966)在2019年10月11日至2022年2月28日之间开始使用艾氯胺酮,并与使用TRD但未使用艾氯胺酮的对照组(n=39,219)进行比较。结果包括启动,诱导(45天内8次给药),和中断(30天治疗间隔)。使用国际疾病分类确定合并症精神病,第十次修订,临床改造,代码。
    结果:病例明显靠近治疗中心(8.9英里vs20.3英里)。与0-9英里相比,起爆率下降11.9%,50.8%,68.1%,75.9%,居住在距中心10-19、20-29、30-39、40-49和50英里以上的个人占92.8%。调整后,与启动可能性增加相关的因素是创伤后应激障碍,伴有自杀意念的重度抑郁症,和男性,在增加距离的同时,物质使用障碍,医疗补助,Charlson合并症指数(CCI),年龄和年龄与较低的可能性相关。与完成诱导的可能性较低相关的因素是医疗补助,低社会经济地位(SES),CCI和西班牙裔社区。与中断可能性增加相关的因素是酒精使用障碍,距离,和少数民族社区,而广泛性焦虑症和医疗补助与较低的可能性相关。
    结论:行程距离,保险,低SES,和少数民族社区是治疗的潜在障碍。可能需要替代护理模式,以确保充分获得护理。
    JClin精神病学2024;85(2):23m15102。
    Background: Under a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy program, esketamine nasal spray CIII requires self administration at a certified treatment center. Our objective was to identify factors associated with esketamine initiation and continuation.
    Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted among US adults who met treatment-resistant depression (TRD) criteria. Cases (n = 966) initiated esketamine between October 11, 2019, and February 28, 2022, and were compared to controls (n = 39,219) with TRD but no esketamine use. Outcomes included initiation, induction (8 administrations within 45 days), and interruptions (30-day treatment gap). Comorbid psychiatric conditions were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes.
    Results: Cases resided significantly closer to treatment centers (8.9 vs 20.3 miles). Compared to 0-9 miles, initiation rate decreased by 11.9%, 50.8%, 68.1%, 75.9%, and 92.8% for individuals residing 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, and 50+ miles from a center. After adjustment, factors associated with increased likelihood of initiation were posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation, and male sex, while increasing distance, substance use disorder, Medicaid, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and older age were associated with lower likelihood. Factors associated with lower likelihood of completing induction were Medicaid, low socioeconomic status (SES), CCI, and Hispanic communities. Factors associated with increased likelihood of interruption were alcohol use disorder, distance, and minority communities, while generalized anxiety disorder and Medicaid were associated with lower likelihood.
    Conclusions: Travel distance, insurance, low SES, and minority communities are potential barriers to treatment. Alternative care models may be needed to ensure adequate access to care.
    J Clin Psychiatry 2024;85(2):23m15102.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:学龄前儿童经常患有呼吸道感染(RI),这可能会导致某些受试者的喘息。2型极化可能有利于增加对RI和相关喘息的敏感性。非药物疗法作为可能的附加疗法正在引起越来越多的兴趣。本初步研究调查了一种新的多组分鼻喷雾剂在患有频繁RI和相关喘息的学龄前儿童中的疗效和安全性。
    方法:一些具有这些特征的学龄前儿童随机服用了该产品,含有乳铁蛋白,甘草酸二钾,羧甲基-β-葡聚糖,和维生素C和D3(Saflovir),每个鼻孔两次喷雾,每天两次,持续3个月。其他儿童仅随机接受标准治疗。结果包括RI的数量和喘息发作,使用药物,和临床表现的严重程度。
    结果:使用这种多组分产品进行附加治疗的学龄前儿童比未经治疗的儿童经历更少的RI,并且使用更少的β-2激动剂(分别为P=0.01和0.029)。
    结论:这项初步研究表明,多组分产品,作为鼻喷雾剂添加,可以减少RIs的发生率和使用对症药物缓解儿童喘息。
    BACKGROUND: Preschoolers frequently have respiratory infections (RIs), which may cause wheezing in some subjects. Type 2 polarization may favor increased susceptibility to RIs and associated wheezing. Non-pharmacological remedies are garnering increasing interest as possible add-on therapies. The present preliminary study investigated the efficacy and safety of a new multi-component nasal spray in preschoolers with frequent RIs and associated wheezing.
    METHODS: Some preschoolers with these characteristics randomly took this product, containing lactoferrin, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, carboxymethyl-beta-glucan, and vitamins C and D3 (Saflovir), two sprays per nostril twice daily for 3 months. Other children were randomly treated only with standard therapy. Outcomes included the number of RIs and wheezing episodes, use of medications, and severity of clinical manifestations.
    RESULTS: Preschoolers treated add-on with this multicomponent product experienced fewer RIs and used fewer beta-2 agonists than untreated children (P = 0.01 and 0.029, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrated that a multicomponent product, administered add-on as a nasal spray, could reduce the incidence of RIs and use of symptomatic drugs for relieving wheezing in children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究CarrieS,O\'HaraJ,FouweatherT,etal.鼻中隔成形术与药物治疗鼻气道阻塞的临床疗效:多中心,开放标签,随机对照试验。英国医学杂志2023;383:e075445。要阅读完整的NIHR警报,转到:https://evidence。尼尔。AC.英国/警报/手术比鼻腔喷雾剂更好,适用于气道严重阻塞的人/。
    The studyCarrie S, O\'Hara J, Fouweather T, et al. Clinical effectiveness of septoplasty versus medical management for nasal airways obstruction: multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2023;383:e075445.To read the full NIHR Alert, go to: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/surgery-is-better-than-nasal-sprays-for-people-with-severely-blocked-airways/.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对现实生活中的鼻炎控制知之甚少,与治疗相关和患者相关因素的贡献也是如此。
    目的:本研究旨在研究持续性鼻炎患者的鼻炎控制水平和鼻炎药物利用情况,并确定鼻炎控制的预测因子。
    方法:在社区药房招募的持续性鼻炎患者中进行了一项横断面观察性研究。参与者完成了鼻炎控制评估测试(RCAT),和一份关于患者/鼻炎特征的问卷,和鼻炎药物使用。还完成了鼻部症状的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。药房配药数据用于计算鼻内糖皮质激素的依从性。使用标准化检查表评估鼻腔喷雾技术。使用线性回归模型探索鼻炎控制的预测因素。
    结果:共1514例患者,在215家药店招募,参加了这项研究(平均年龄48.7岁,62%女性)。几乎60%的鼻炎控制不佳(RCAT≤21/30)。VAS上的50mm截止值产生78.1%的敏感性,以识别次优的鼻炎控制。参与者最常使用鼻内糖皮质激素(55.6%)和鼻内减充血剂(47.4%)。目前只有10.3%的鼻喷雾剂使用者表现出完美的技术。超过一半(54.8%)的糖皮质激素使用者被确定为粘附不足。女性性别,自我报告的鼻腔高反应性,活动性哮喘,使用口服/鼻内减充血剂或鼻腔盐水被确定为鼻炎控制较差的预测因素。
    结论:在持续性鼻炎患者的现实生活样本中,鼻炎控制欠佳是常见的。改善鼻炎药物的使用可能是提高疾病控制的关键。
    BACKGROUND: Little is known about rhinitis control in real-life, nor about the contribution of treatment-related and patient-related factors.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the level of rhinitis control and rhinitis medication utilization in patients with persistent rhinitis and to identify predictors of rhinitis control.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in patients with persistent rhinitis recruited in community pharmacies. Participants completed the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test, a questionnaire on patient/rhinitis characteristics, and rhinitis medication use. A visual analog scale for nasal symptoms was also completed. Pharmacy dispensing data were used to calculate adherence to intranasal glucocorticoids. Nasal spray technique was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Predictors of rhinitis control were explored using a linear regression model.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,514 patients, recruited in 215 pharmacies, participated in the study (mean age 48.7 y, 62% female). Almost 60% exhibited suboptimal rhinitis control (Rhinitis Control Assessment Test ≤ 21 of 30). A 50-mm cut-off on the visual analog scale yielded 78.1% sensitivity to identify suboptimal rhinitis control. Participants most frequently used intranasal glucocorticoids (55.6%) and intranasal decongestants (47.4%). Only 10.3% of current nasal spray users demonstrated perfect technique. More than half (54.8%) of glucocorticoid users were identified as underadherent. Female sex, self-reported nasal hyperreactivity, active asthma, and use of oral/intranasal decongestants or nasal saline were identified as predictors of worse rhinitis control.
    CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal rhinitis control was common in this real-life sample of persistent rhinitis patients. Improving use of rhinitis medication may be key to increase disease control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号