Nasal Sprays

鼻腔喷雾剂
  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    在可预见的未来,由复合药剂师制备的0.5%噻吗洛尔鼻喷雾剂将是急性偏头痛治疗中潜在的戏剧性新范式的唯一来源。1也可能使用复合噻吗洛尔鼻喷雾剂治疗其他医学疾病,当静脉输注不可能或不可行时,需要极快的治疗性β受体阻滞剂血液水平。本手稿将回顾过去十二年来复合噻吗洛尔药物的研究和开发,并参考IJPC上的先前文章,详细介绍了如何制备药物复合产品。2最终目标是让医生与复合药房建立有益的工作关系,以立即向患者提供溶液中0.5%的β受体阻滞剂噻吗洛尔的鼻喷雾剂。最近首次被证明对急性偏头痛治疗有益。
    For the foreseeable future, timolol 0.5% nasal spray prepared by compounding pharmacists will be the only source for a potentially dramatic new paradigm in the treatment of acute migraine.1 It is also likely other medical conditions can be treated with the compounded timolol nasal spray that need extremely rapid therapeutic beta blocker blood levels when IV infusion is not possible or practical. This manuscript will review the research and development of compounded timolol medication over the past dozen years and reference previous articles in IJPC detailing how the pharmaceutical compounded product is prepared.2 A final goal is to engage physicians in a beneficial working relationship with compounding pharmacies to make immediately available to patients a nasal spray formulation of the beta blocker timolol 0.5% in solution. It has recently been demonstrated for the first time to benefit acute migraine treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:伴有或不伴有哮喘的夜尿症是衰老疾病之一。去氨加压素已被用作患有夜尿症的患者的鼻喷雾剂。这项研究确定了去氨加压素对离体气管平滑肌的影响。方法:评价去氨加压素对离体大鼠气管平滑肌的疗效。评估去氨加压素对气管平滑肌的以下作用:(1)对静息张力的影响;(2)对副交感神经模拟物10-6M乙酰甲胆碱引起的收缩的影响;(3)对电产生的气管平滑肌收缩的影响。结果:随着浓度的增加,去氨加压素本身对气管基线张力无影响。以10-5M或以上的剂量添加去氨加压素会引起对10-6M乙酰甲胆碱诱导的收缩的显着舒张反应。去氨加压素还可以抑制电场引起的气管尖峰收缩。结论:根据本研究,大量去氨加压素可能阻止气管副交感神经活动。由于其能够阻断副交感神经活动并减轻乙酰甲胆碱引起的气管平滑肌收缩,去氨加压素鼻喷雾剂可以帮助夜尿症患者减少哮喘发作。
    Objectives: Nocturia with or without asthma is one of the aging diseases. Desmopressin has been used as a nasal spray for patients who are suffering from nocturia. This study determined the effects of desmopressin on isolated tracheal smooth muscle in vitro. Methods: We evaluated desmopressin\'s efficiency on isolated rat tracheal smooth muscle. Desmopressin was evaluated for the following effects on tracheal smooth muscle: (1) effect on resting tension; (2) effect on contraction brought on by parasympathetic mimetic 10-6 M methacholine; and (3) effect on electrically produced tracheal smooth muscle contractions. Results: As the concentration grew, desmopressin by itself had no impact on the trachea\'s baseline tension. Addition of desmopressin at doses of 10-5 M or above elicited a significant relaxation response to 10-6 M methacholine-induced contraction. Desmopressin could also inhibit spike contraction of the trachea induced by electrical field. Conclusion: According to this study, desmopressin at high quantities may prevent the trachea\'s parasympathetic activity. Due to its ability to block parasympathetic activity and lessen the contraction of the tracheal smooth muscle brought on by methacholine, Desmopressin nasal spray might help nocturia sufferers experience fewer asthma attacks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:少量证据表明鼻喷雾剂,或者身体活动和压力管理,可以缩短呼吸道感染的持续时间。这项研究旨在评估鼻腔喷雾剂或促进身体活动和压力管理的行为干预对呼吸系统疾病的影响。与平时的护理相比。
    方法:这是随机的,控制,开放标签,在英国的332名全科医生诊所进行了平行组试验.符合条件的成年人(年龄≥18岁)至少有一种合并症或风险因素会增加他们因呼吸道疾病而导致不良结局的风险(例如,严重疾病或药物治疗引起的免疫损害;心脏病;哮喘或肺病;糖尿病;轻度肝功能损害;中风或严重的神经系统问题;肥胖[BMI≥30kg/m2];或年龄≥65岁)或在正常年份至少有三次自我报告的呼吸道感染(即,在COVID-19大流行之前的任何一年)。参与者被随机分配(1:1:1:1)使用计算机系统进行:常规护理(关于管理疾病的简短建议);基于凝胶的喷雾剂(在感染的第一个迹象或潜在暴露于感染后,每个鼻孔喷雾两次,每天最多6次);盐水喷雾(在感染的第一个迹象或潜在暴露于感染后,每个鼻孔喷雾两次,每天最多6次);或简短的行为干预,其中参与者可以访问促进体育锻炼和压力管理的网站。该研究被部分掩盖:研究人员和医务人员都不知道治疗分配,进行统计学分析的研究者并不知晓治疗分配.重新标记喷雾剂以保持参与者掩蔽。使用参与者完成的月度调查和6个月时的调查数据评估结果。主要结果是由于自我报告的呼吸道疾病而患病的总天数(咳嗽,感冒,喉咙痛,鼻窦或耳部感染,流感,或COVID-19)在过去6个月中,在修改后的意向治疗人群中评估,其中包括所有具有主要结局数据的随机分配参与者.关键的次要结果是可能的危害,包括头痛或面部疼痛,和抗生素的使用,在所有随机分配的参与者中进行评估。该试验已在ISRCTN注册,17936080,并已停止招募。
    结果:在2020年12月12日至2023年4月7日之间,对19475名个人进行了资格筛选,13799名参与者被随机分配到常规护理(n=3451),基于凝胶的鼻喷雾剂(n=3448),生理盐水喷鼻剂(n=3450),或促进身体活动和压力管理的数字干预(n=3450)。11612名参与者具有主要结局的完整数据,并被纳入主要结局分析(常规护理组,n=2983;凝胶喷雾组,n=2935;生理盐水喷雾组,n=2967;行为网站组,n=2727)。与常规护理组的参与者相比,平均患病8·2(SD16·1)天,在基于凝胶的喷雾组(平均6·5天[SD12·8];调整后的发病率比率[IRR]0·82[99%CI0·76-0·90];p<0·0001)和盐水喷雾组(6·4天[12·4];0·81[0·74-0·88];p<0·0001)中,但不在分配给行为网站的组中(7·4天[14·7];0·97[0·89-1·06];p=0·46)。最常见的不良事件是基于凝胶的组的头痛或窦性疼痛:常规护理组2556名参与者中的123名(4·8%);基于凝胶的组的2498名参与者中的199名(7·8%)(风险比1·61[95%CI1·30-1·99];p<0·0001);盐水组的2377名参与者中的101(4·5%)(0·91与平时护理相比,所有干预措施的抗生素使用率均较低:凝胶喷雾组的IRR0·65(95%CI0·50-0·84;p=0·001);生理盐水喷雾组的IRR0·69(0·45-0·88;p=0·003);行为网站组的IRR0·74(0·57-0·94;p=0·02).
    结论:建议使用任何一种鼻喷雾剂可缩短病程,同时使用喷雾剂和行为网站可减少抗生素的使用。未来的研究应旨在解决广泛实施这些简单干预措施的影响。
    背景:国家卫生和护理研究所。
    BACKGROUND: A small amount of evidence suggests that nasal sprays, or physical activity and stress management, could shorten the duration of respiratory infections. This study aimed to assess the effect of nasal sprays or a behavioural intervention promoting physical activity and stress management on respiratory illnesses, compared with usual care.
    METHODS: This randomised, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial was done at 332 general practitioner practices in the UK. Eligible adults (aged ≥18 years) had at least one comorbidity or risk factor increasing their risk of adverse outcomes due to respiratory illness (eg, immune compromise due to serious illness or medication; heart disease; asthma or lung disease; diabetes; mild hepatic impairment; stroke or severe neurological problem; obesity [BMI ≥30 kg/m2]; or age ≥65 years) or at least three self-reported respiratory tract infections in a normal year (ie, any year before the COVID-19 pandemic). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using a computerised system to: usual care (brief advice about managing illness); gel-based spray (two sprays per nostril at the first sign of an infection or after potential exposure to infection, up to 6 times per day); saline spray (two sprays per nostril at the first sign of an infection or after potential exposure to infection, up to 6 times per day); or a brief behavioural intervention in which participants were given access to a website promoting physical activity and stress management. The study was partially masked: neither investigators nor medical staff were aware of treatment allocation, and investigators who did the statistical analysis were unaware of treatment allocation. The sprays were relabelled to maintain participant masking. Outcomes were assessed using data from participants\' completed monthly surveys and a survey at 6 months. The primary outcome was total number of days of illness due to self-reported respiratory tract illnesses (coughs, colds, sore throat, sinus or ear infections, influenza, or COVID-19) in the previous 6 months, assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned participants who had primary outcome data available. Key secondary outcomes were possible harms, including headache or facial pain, and antibiotic use, assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial was registered with ISRCTN, 17936080, and is closed to recruitment.
    RESULTS: Between Dec 12, 2020, and April 7, 2023, of 19 475 individuals screened for eligibility, 13 799 participants were randomly assigned to usual care (n=3451), gel-based nasal spray (n=3448), saline nasal spray (n=3450), or the digital intervention promoting physical activity and stress management (n=3450). 11 612 participants had complete data for the primary outcome and were included in the primary outcome analysis (usual care group, n=2983; gel-based spray group, n=2935; saline spray group, n=2967; behavioural website group, n=2727). Compared with participants in the usual care group, who had a mean of 8·2 (SD 16·1) days of illness, the number of days of illness was significantly lower in the gel-based spray group (mean 6·5 days [SD 12·8]; adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0·82 [99% CI 0·76-0·90]; p<0·0001) and the saline spray group (6·4 days [12·4]; 0·81 [0·74-0·88]; p<0·0001), but not in the group allocated to the behavioural website (7·4 days [14·7]; 0·97 [0·89-1·06]; p=0·46). The most common adverse event was headache or sinus pain in the gel-based group: 123 (4·8%) of 2556 participants in the usual care group; 199 (7·8%) of 2498 participants in the gel-based group (risk ratio 1·61 [95% CI 1·30-1·99]; p<0·0001); 101 (4·5%) of 2377 participants in the saline group (0·81 [0·63-1·05]; p=0·11); and 101 (4·5%) of 2091 participants in the behavioural intervention group (0·95 [0·74-1·22]; p=0·69). Compared with usual care, antibiotic use was lower for all interventions: IRR 0·65 (95% CI 0·50-0·84; p=0·001) for the gel-based spray group; 0·69 (0·45-0·88; p=0·003) for the saline spray group; and 0·74 (0·57-0·94; p=0·02) for the behavioural website group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Advice to use either nasal spray reduced illness duration and both sprays and the behavioural website reduced antibiotic use. Future research should aim to address the impact of the widespread implementation of these simple interventions.
    BACKGROUND: National Institute for Health and Care Research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在ESCAPE-TRD(NCT04338321)中,与喹硫平缓释剂(XR)相比,在难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者中,艾氯胺酮鼻喷雾剂(NS)显着增加了第8周缓解的可能性,以及在第8周缓解后第32周无复发的可能性。这里,我们探索时间进程,IIIb期ESCAPE-TRD试验中治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)的负担和后果。TRD患者以1:1的比例随机分配给艾氯胺酮NS或喹硫平XR,与正在进行的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂/5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂一起按标签给药。在这个二级出版物中,安全性分析(包括接受≥1剂量研究治疗的患者)包括发病率,TEAE的严重程度和持续时间(Kaplan-Meier方法),以及随后的性格变化。P值未针对多次测试进行调整。336名患者被随机分配给艾氯胺酮NS和340名患者接受喹硫平XR;334和336名患者接受≥1剂量的研究治疗。分别。与喹硫平XR相比,esketamineNS的TEAE明显更常见(91.9%对78.0%;p<0.001),但通常是轻度/中度和短暂的性质:在同一天解决的比例更大(92.0%对12.1%),导致治疗中断的患者明显减少(4.2%对11.0%,分别为;p<0.001)。使用esketamineNS治疗TEAE的天数比例显著低于喹硫平XR(中位数:11.9%对21.3%;p<0.001)。虽然使用esketamineNS更频繁,TEAE通常是短暂的和轻度的,与喹硫平XR相比,停药的可能性较小。数据与已建立的安全概况一致,没有发现新的安全信号。除了更高的疗效,与喹硫平XR相比,艾氯胺酮NS明显更有利的耐受性特征进一步支持其用于TRD.
    In ESCAPE-TRD (NCT04338321), esketamine nasal spray (NS) significantly increased the probability of remission at Week 8, and of being relapse-free through Week 32 after remission at Week 8, versus quetiapine extended release (XR) in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Here, we explore the time course, burden and consequences of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the phase IIIb ESCAPE‑TRD trial. Patients with TRD were randomised 1:1 to esketamine NS or quetiapine XR, dosed per label alongside an ongoing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. In this secondary publication, safety analyses (comprising patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment) included incidence, severity and durations (Kaplan‑Meier method) of TEAEs, and subsequent dispositional changes. P values were not adjusted for multiple testing. 336 patients were randomised to esketamine NS and 340 to quetiapine XR; 334 and 336 received ≥1 dose of study treatment, respectively. TEAEs were significantly more common with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (91.9 % versus 78.0 %; p < 0.001), but were typically mild/moderate and transient in nature: a greater proportion resolved on the same-day (92.0 % versus 12.1 %) and lead to treatment discontinuation in significantly fewer patients (4.2 % versus 11.0 %, respectively; p < 0.001). The proportion of days spent with TEAEs was significantly lower with esketamine NS than quetiapine XR (median: 11.9 % versus 21.3 %; p < 0.001). Although more frequent with esketamine NS, TEAEs were typically transient and mild, with discontinuation less likely versus quetiapine XR. Data were consistent with established safety profiles, with no new safety signals identified. Alongside greater efficacy, the demonstrably more favourable tolerability profile of esketamine NS versus quetiapine XR further supports its use for TRD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Zavegepant是一种新型gepant,在美国以10mg剂量批准的鼻喷雾剂,用于成人有或没有先兆的偏头痛的急性治疗。在健康参与者的单次递增剂量(SAD)和多次递增剂量(MAD)研究中评估了zavegepant鼻喷雾剂的心血管安全性。SAD研究包括72名参与者(54名活跃/18名安慰剂),他们接受了0.1-40mgzavegepant或安慰剂。MAD研究包括72名参与者(56名活跃/16名安慰剂),他们接受5-40mgzavegepant或安慰剂1-14天。血浆zavegepant药代动力学和心电图(ECG)参数(Fridericia校正的QT间期[QTcF],心率,PR间隔,心室去极化[QRS],T波形态,和U波存在)在zavegepant给药前后进行分析。使用来自SAD和MAD研究的汇总数据,使用线性混合效应模型评估了时间匹配的血浆zavegepant浓度与QTc间期之间的关系,以评估QTc间期延长的可能性.结果表明,与安慰剂相比,单剂量和多剂量的zavegepant对ECG参数没有显着影响,对QTcF间期无浓度依赖性影响。血浆zavegepant浓度-QTcF模型的估计斜率为-0.053ms/ng/mL,90%置信区间为-0.0955至-0.0110(p=0.0415),这在临床上没有意义。剂量高达推荐每日剂量的四倍,zavegepant不会将QT间期延长至任何临床相关程度。
    Zavegepant is a novel gepant administered as a nasal spray approved in the United States at a 10 mg dose for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The cardiovascular safety of zavegepant nasal spray was assessed in both single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies in healthy participants. The SAD study included 72 participants (54 active/18 placebo) who received 0.1-40 mg zavegepant or placebo. The MAD study included 72 participants (56 active/16 placebo) who received 5-40 mg zavegepant or placebo for 1-14 days. Plasma zavegepant pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (Fridericia-corrected QT interval [QTcF], heart rate, PR interval, ventricular depolarization [QRS], T-wave morphology, and U-wave presence) were analyzed pre- and post-zavegepant administration. Using pooled data from the SAD and MAD studies, the relationship between time-matched plasma zavegepant concentrations and QTc interval was assessed using a linear mixed-effects model to evaluate the potential for QTc interval prolongation. Results showed that single and multiple doses of zavegepant had no significant impact on ECG parameters versus placebo, and there was no concentration-dependent effect on QTcF interval. The estimated slope of the plasma zavegepant concentration-QTcF model was -0.053 ms per ng/mL with a 90% confidence interval of -0.0955 to -0.0110 (p = 0.0415), which is not considered clinically meaningful. At doses up to four times the recommended daily dose, zavegepant does not prolong the QT interval to any clinically relevant extent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项III期随机双盲对照试验的目的是研究在芝麻油(RG)鼻喷雾剂中使用玫瑰天竺葵与等渗盐水(IS)鼻喷雾剂对缓解化疗患者鼻前庭炎症状的疗效。
    方法:接受主动化疗并报告相关鼻部症状的患者以1:1的比例随机分配接受RG或IS,每天两次,持续2周。同意的参与者在基线时完成鼻部症状问卷,然后在治疗期间每周完成一次。开始鼻腔喷雾2周后鼻部症状改善的患者比例,使用六点的全球变化分数,在每个随机分组内和之间进行估计,和武器之间的比较,使用费希尔的精确检验。确定估计的比值比(95%置信区间)。
    结果:106名患者同意这项研究;RG组的43名参与者和IS组的41名参与者可评估主要终点。参与者的平均年龄为57.8岁(SD13.9)。两组之间的人口统计学特征和基线鼻部症状相似。在接受RG的可评估参与者中,67.4%报告鼻腔症状改善,与36.6%接受IS的参与者相比(P=0.009)。不良事件很少,两组之间没有差异。
    结论:芝麻油中的玫瑰天竺葵可显著改善化疗患者的鼻前庭炎症状。
    背景:NCT04620369。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this phase III randomized double-blinded controlled trial was to investigate the efficacy of a rose geranium in sesame oil (RG) nasal spray compared with an isotonic saline (IS) nasal spray for alleviating nasal vestibulitis symptoms among patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    METHODS: Patients undergoing active chemotherapy who reported associated nasal symptoms were randomized 1:1 to receive RG or IS, administered twice daily for 2 weeks. Consenting participants completed nasal symptom questionnaires at baseline and then weekly while on treatment. The proportion of patients experiencing improvements in their nasal symptoms 2 weeks after initiating the nasal spray, using a six-point global impression of change score, was estimated within and between each randomized arm, and compared between arms, using Fisher\'s exact test. The estimated odds ratio was determined (95% confidence interval).
    RESULTS: One hundred and six patients consented to this study; 43 participants in the RG arm and 41 in the IS arm were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Participants had a mean age of 57.8 years (SD 13.9). Demographic characteristics and baseline nasal symptoms were similar between arms. Of the evaluable participants who received RG, 67.4% reported improved nasal symptoms, compared with 36.6% of the participants who received IS (P = 0.009). Adverse events were sparse and did not differ between arms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rose geranium in sesame oil significantly improves nasal vestibulitis symptoms among patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04620369.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    阿米洛利是美国食品和药物管理局批准的利尿剂,用于治疗高血压和充血性心力衰竭。最近的人类和动物研究表明,阿米洛利还可能通过其酸敏感离子通道拮抗作用在治疗焦虑症中发挥作用。通过临时复合制剂鼻内施用阿米洛利鼻喷雾剂具有快速递送至作用部位以在患有焦虑症的个体患者中实现治疗结果的潜力。然而,这些患者特异性制剂不具有制剂前的特征,包括化学稳定性,传统制造的剂型。这项研究的目的是评估复合阿米洛利鼻喷雾剂在6个月和12个月内利用高热加速降解和阿伦尼乌斯方程的估计化学稳定性。在12个月的时间内,以适当的间隔采用了指示稳定性的高效液相色谱分析方法,以揭示阿米洛利在测试期间和通过外推法保持化学稳定。物理稳定性和与防腐剂苯甲醇的相容性也通过目视检查证实。pH监测,和浊度的测量。
    Amiloride is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved diuretic agent used to treat hypertension and congestive heart failure. Recent human and animal studies have suggested that amiloride may also have a role in treating anxiety through its acid-sensing ion channel antagonism. Intranasal administration of amiloride nasal spray via an extemporaneously compounded preparation has the potential for rapid delivery to the site of action to achieve therapeutic outcomes in individual patients with anxiety disorders. However, these patient-specific preparations do not have the pre-formulation characterization, including chemical stability, that conventional manufactured dosage forms have. The objective of this study was to assess the estimated chemical stability of compounded amiloride nasal spray over 6 months and 12 months utilizing accelerated degradation with high heat and the Arrhenius equation. A stability-indicating highperformance liquid chromatography analytical method was employed at appropriate intervals over a 12-month period to reveal that amiloride remained chemically stable over the period tested and by extrapolation. Physical stability and compatibility with the preservative benzyl alcohol were also confirmed via visual inspection, pH monitoring, and measurement of turbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    治疗性液体和疫苗的鼻给药用于治疗过敏性鼻炎,鼻窦炎,拥塞,冠状病毒甚至阿尔茨海默病。在后者中,药物必须到达嗅觉区域,所以它进入了中枢神经系统。由于鼻腔的曲折解剖结构,能够到达嗅觉区域的有效给药技术具有挑战性。并且经常使用透明解剖模型在体外进行评估。这里,3D打印人鼻腔内的液体分布被量化为模型流体,该模型流体是由带有喷雾生成喷嘴的1-mL注射器排出而产生的,和发射准直流体流的直尖端。使用两种具有不同粘度的模型流体的实验表明,正确定位的直尖端连接到注射器能够有效地输送大部分的治疗流体在人体嗅觉区域在侧躺位置,避免采用头靠和头靠下的位置,这对于典型的阿尔茨海默病年龄范围内的患者来说是困难的。此外,我们通过计算机模拟证明了结论在很宽的参数范围内是有效的。
    The nasal administration of therapeutic fluids and vaccines is used to treat allergic rhinitis, sinusitis, congestion, coronaviruses and even Alzheimer\'s disease. In the latter, the drug must reach the olfactory region, so it finds its way into the central nervous system. Effective administration techniques able to reach the olfactory region are challenging due to the tortuous anatomy of the nasal cavity, and are frequently evaluated in vitro using transparent anatomical models. Here, the liquid distribution inside a 3D printed human nasal cavity is quantified for model fluids resulting from the discharge of a 1-mL syringe with either a spray-generating nozzle, and a straight tip emitting a collimated fluid stream. Experiments using two model fluids with different viscosities suggest that a simple, correctly positioned straight tip attached to a syringe is able to efficiently deliver most of a therapeutic fluid in the human olfactory region in the side-laying position, avoiding the adoption of head-back and head-down positions that can be difficult for patients in the age range typical of Alzheimer\'s disease. Furthermore, we demonstrate by computer simulations that the conclusion is valid within a wide range of parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号