Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

慢性威胁肢体缺血
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在一些患者中,血运重建是不可能的或无效的。对于这些,经皮深静脉动脉化(p-DVA)可被视为替代治疗.这项研究的目的是评估仅具有一个经皮通道的血管内超声(IVUS)引导技术的长期结果。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性单中心研究,研究对象为18条非选择性CLTI肢体,采用IVUS引导的p-DVA治疗。主要结局指标是:无重大不良事件(MAE)和30天的生存率;30天的保肢和无截肢生存率(AFS)。6个月,12个月和24个月。次要结果指标是:程序成功,生存,通畅和伤口愈合。
    结果:我们用无选择的CLTI治疗了14例患者,进行18p-DVA。中位年龄为74,4岁(60-87岁)。所有这些患者先前的胫骨和足动脉血管成形术失败。程序性成功率,定义为建立进入脚静脉系统的动脉血流,是100%。30天时无死亡和MAE记录。存活率是100%,83.4%和77.8%;保肢率88.9%,77.8%和77.8%;AFS为88.9%,6、12和24个月分别为61.1%和55.6%。6个月时伤口完全愈合为18.7%,12个月时为80.0%,24个月时为100%。
    结论:基于这些结果,IVUS引导的p-DVA对于无选择的CLTI患者似乎是安全有效的,没有与干预相关的死亡率,可接受的保肢率和无截肢生存率。
    OBJECTIVE: In some patients, revascularization is not possible or is not effective. For these, percutaneous deep vein arterialization (p-DVA) could be considered an alternative treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term results of an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided technique that has only one percutaneous access.
    METHODS: This is a prospective monocentric study on 18 no-option CLTI limbs treated with an IVUS-guided p-DVA. The primary outcome measures are: the freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) and survival at 30 days; limb salvage and amputation free survival (AFS) at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. The secondary outcome measures are: procedural success, survival, patency and wound healing.
    RESULTS: We treated 14 patients with no-option CLTI, carrying out 18 p-DVA. Median age was 74,4 years (60-87). All these patients had a previous failed angioplasty of the tibial and foot arteries. Procedural success rate, defined as the establishment of arterial flow into the venous system of the foot, was 100%. No deaths and MAEs recorded at 30 days. Survival was 100%, 83.4% and 77.8%; limb salvage was 88.9%, 77.8% and 77.8%; AFS was 88.9%, 61.1% and 55.6% at 6, 12 and 24 months. Complete wound healing was 18.7% at 6 months, 80.0% at 12 months and 100% at 24 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, the IVUS-guided p-DVA seems to be safe and effective for no-option CLTI patients, with no mortality related to the intervention, an acceptable limb salvage rate and amputation free survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    西洛他唑已经报道了预防缺血性卒中患者吸入性肺炎的有效性,但它是否对慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)患者同样有益尚不清楚.
    这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了1,368例接受血管内治疗(EVT)的CLTI患者。在多变量分析中,吸入性肺炎的预测因素为年龄(风险比[HR]1.06[95%置信区间(CI)1.03-1.10]),非动态状态(HR2.54[95%CI1.38-4.65]),老年营养风险指数(HR0.97[95%CI0.95-0.99]),和西洛他唑(HR0.37[95%CI0.16-0.87])。
    西洛他唑可降低接受EVT的CLTI患者发生吸入性肺炎的风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Cilostazol has reported effectiveness for preventing aspiration pneumonia in patients with ischemic stroke, but whether it is similarly beneficial for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective single-center study enrolled 1,368 CLTI patients treated with endovascular therapy (EVT). In the multivariate analysis, predictors for aspiration pneumonia were age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.10]), non-ambulatory status (HR 2.54 [95% CI 1.38-4.65]), the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.95-0.99]), and cilostazol (HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.16-0.87]).
    UNASSIGNED: Cilostazol administration reduced the risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients with CLTI undergoing EVT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外周动脉疾病(PAD)是最普遍的心血管疾病过程之一,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)患者,PAD最严重的表现,在整个PAD人群中,心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率最高。由于小血管口径以及终末期肾病和糖尿病的常见合并症,膝盖以下(BTK)PAD患者对CLTI的倾向增加。倾向于优先影响小动脉床。对于那些与BTKPAD与CLTI,护理标准是血运重建.早期血运重建采用外科搭桥术进行。然而,血管内技术,从经皮腔内血管成形术开始,扩展到辅助设备和疗法的现代设备,由于BTKPAD,已成为大多数CLTI患者的护理标准。在这次审查中,我们将讨论现代手术和血管内血管重建的方法,以及目前正在开发或预先批准的BTKPAD治疗装置。
    Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents one of the most prevalent cardiovascular disease processes and carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the most severe manifestation of PAD, have the highest rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the overall PAD population. Patients with below-the-knee (BTK) PAD have an increased propensity toward CLTI due to small-vessel caliber and the frequently comorbid conditions of end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus, which tend to affect small artery beds preferentially. For those with BTK PAD with CLTI, the standard of care is revascularization. Early revascularization was performed using surgical bypass. However, endovascular techniques, starting with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and expanding to the modern armamentarium of adjunctive devices and therapies, have become standard of care for most patients with CLTI due to BTK PAD. In this review, we will discuss the modern surgical and endovascular approaches to revascularization, as well as devices that are currently in development or preapproval study for the treatment of BTK PAD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:外周动脉疾病的患病率正在上升,全球数百万人遭受其最后阶段的表现,慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)。下肢搭桥等血运重建手术在保肢中起着至关重要的作用,但最佳的药物治疗对于最大化这些手术的益处和降低心血管和肢体相关事件的长期风险至关重要。
    结果:接受下肢搭桥手术的PAD患者需要采取全面的方法来改变危险因素,以进行心血管和肢体相关并发症的一级和二级预防。这包括适当使用高强度他汀类药物,戒烟,以及高血压和糖尿病的管理。此外,抗血小板治疗适用于所有CLTI患者,低剂量抗凝治疗也可能有益.
    结论:最佳药物治疗对于优化下肢旁路手术患者的预后至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of peripheral artery disease is growing, with millions of people globally suffering its end-stage manifestation, chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Revascularization procedures like lower extremity bypass play a vital role in limb salvage but optimal medical therapy is essential for maximizing the benefit of these procedures and reducing long-term risks of cardiovascular and limb-related events.
    RESULTS: Patients with PAD who undergo lower extremity bypass warrant a comprehensive approach to risk factor modification for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and limb-related complications. This includes appropriate use of high-intensity statins, smoking cessation, and management of hypertension and diabetes. Additionally, antiplatelet therapy is indicated for all patients with CLTI and additional treatment with low-dose anticoagulation may also be beneficial.
    CONCLUSIONS: Optimal medical therapy is essential for optimizing outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing lower extremity bypass.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述一种新颖的救助技术,以接近踝下(BTA)慢性完全闭塞或足弓严重疾病,其中球囊/导管无法跟随交叉导丝,并且没有其他描述的再通方法是可行的。
    当面对复杂的BTA血运重建时,如果导丝穿过,但由于缺乏可推动性,球囊无法前进,对导丝尖端所在的膝下血管进行顺行穿刺。然后将导丝小心地导航通过该远端BTA血管进入针中以实现其会合和外化。低轮廓的球囊通过股骨通路插入并前进直到BTA血管的不可交叉点。然后将扭矩装置连接到球囊的近端毂,然后将穿通导丝从新的远端通道中拉出,允许气球与电线一起拖过病变。
    对于高度复杂的BTA血运重建手术,可以考虑使用踝关节下顺行远距(BAT)技术,其中导线穿过病变,但没有其他设备可以跟踪它。
    结论:本文的临床影响在于描述了导丝交叉的BTA血运重建的救助技术,但没有设备可以先进。这种技术在未能取得成功可能导致肢体丧失的情况下可能是有帮助的。BAT技术在极具挑战性的情况下提供了解决方案,增强技术成功,改善预后并可能保留否则将面临截肢的患者的四肢,如果不是血运重建的话.该视频显示了在透视下使用支持导管进行的BAT技术:对DP进行的前置式穿刺,支撑导管在导线上的推进,导管中导丝的会合和随后的线的外部化。
    UNASSIGNED: To describe a novel bailout technique to approach below-the-ankle (BTA) chronic total occlusions or plantar-arch severe disease where the balloon/catheter is unable to follow the crossing guidewire and no other described recanalization approach is feasible.
    UNASSIGNED: When facing a complex BTA revascularization, if the guidewire crosses but the balloon cannot progress due to a lack of pushability, an antegrade puncture of the infrapopliteal vessel where the tip of the guidewire lays is performed. The guidewire is then carefully navigated through this distal BTA vessel into the needle to achieve its rendezvous and externalization. A low-profile balloon is inserted through the femoral access and advanced till the non-crossable point of the BTA vessels. A torque device is then attached to the proximal hub of the balloon, and the through-and-through guidewire is subsequently pulled from the new distal access, allowing the balloon to be dragged across the lesion together with the wire.
    UNASSIGNED: The below-the-ankle antegrade teleferic (BAT) technique may be considered for highly complex BTA revascularization procedures where the wire crosses the lesion, but no other device can be tracked over it.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical impact of this article lies in the description of a bailout technique for BTA revascularization where the guidewire crosses, but no device can be advanced. This technique can be helpful in scenarios where failure to achieve success could result in limb loss. The BAT technique provides a solution in extremely challenging cases, enhancing technical success, improving outcomes and potentially preserving the limbs of patients who would otherwise face amputation, if not revascularized.The video shows the BAT technique performed with a support catheter under fluoroscopy: antegrate puncture of the DP, advancement of the support catheter over the wire, rendezvous of the guidewire in the catheter and subsequent externalization of the wire.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    无选择的慢性威胁肢体缺血的患者不是常规血运重建的候选人,并且不可避免地需要大截肢。深静脉动脉化(DVA)是这些患者的潜在选择。一个完整的血管内系统进行DVA最近获得了广泛的赞誉和美国食品和药物管理局的批准。然而,严重的胫骨内侧钙质沉着症患者,如糖尿病或肾功能衰竭患者,可能不适合这种情况,因为大多数血管内针无法穿透严重的钙质.在这里,我们描述了一种新型的DVA混合方法,该方法在三名患有终末期肾病和严重内侧钙质沉着症的患者中取得了技术成功。
    Patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia are not candidates for conventional revascularization options and will inevitably require major amputation. Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a potential option for these patients. A complete endovascular system to perform DVA has recently received great acclaim and US Foor and Drug Administration approval. However, patients with severe tibial medial calcinosis such as those with diabetes or renal failure may not be candidates for this because most endovascular needles cannot penetrate severe calcium. Here we describe a novel hybrid approach to DVA that provided technical success in three patients with end-stage renal disease and severe medial calcinosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性威胁肢体缺血定义为缺血性静息疼痛或组织丢失(例如,溃疡/坏疽)存在超过2周。整理包括一个仔细的历史,体检的重点是评估脉搏和伤口,下肢无创血管研究(如,踝臂指数,脚趾压力),大隐静脉标测,和下肢动脉解剖成像(例如,计算机断层扫描,磁共振,或减影血管造影),如果计划进行血运重建干预。
    Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is defined as ischemic rest pain or tissue loss (eg, ulceration/gangrene) that has been present for greater than 2 weeks. Workup includes a careful history, physical examination focused on evaluation of pulses and wounds, lower extremity noninvasive vascular studies (eg, ankle-brachial indices, toe pressures), saphenous vein mapping, and imaging of the lower extremity arterial anatomy (eg, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, or subtraction angiography) if a revascularization intervention is planned.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前评估组织缺血的方法主要基于评估血流而不是组织灌注。然而,糖尿病主要影响小血管和血流评估不足。该试验的目的是评估NIRS在测量膝关节以下(BTK)动脉慢性完全闭塞(CTO)血运重建过程中灌注变化的可行性。
    进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。在血管内血运重建过程中,使用三个NIRS传感器测量组织氧合变化.评估术后血管造影和30天伤口愈合。
    该研究纳入了30例慢性威胁肢体缺血患者,阻塞在膝盖动脉以下,卢瑟福5号.平均年龄74.7±11.2岁,16例(53%)患者患有糖尿病,10例(33%)有终末期肾病。血运重建后,在伤口附近的传感器上观察到有统计学意义的NIRSrSO2增加,p=0.001。30天的随访包括27名患者,因为3名患者死亡。比较伤口愈合良好组与伤口愈合不良组术中NIRSrSO2升高差异有统计学意义,p=0.017。
    该研究证实,在膝下动脉血运重建过程中,NIRS可检测到组织灌注增加。术中NIRSrSO2的增加被证明可以预测伤口愈合的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Current methods evaluating tissue ischemia are based mainly on evaluating blood flow and not tissue perfusion. However, diabetes mainly affects small vessels and blood flow evaluation is insufficient. The aim of the trial was to evaluate the feasibility of NIRS in measuring perfusion changes during chronic total occlusion (CTO) revascularization in below the knee (BTK) arteries.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective observational study was performed. During the endovascular revascularization procedure, tissue oxygenation changes were measured using three NIRS sensors. Postoperative angiographies and 30 days wound healing was evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: The study enrolled 30 patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia, occluded below the knee arteries, Rutherford 5. Mean age 74.7 ± 11.2 years, 16 (53%) of the patients had diabetes mellitus, 10 (33%) had end-stage renal disease. A statistically significant NIRS rSO 2 increase was observed on sensors near the wound after the revascularization, p = 0.001. Thirty days follow-up visits included 27 patients, because 3 patients had died. Comparing good wound healing group with poor wound healing group intraoperative NIRS rSO 2 increase difference was statistically significant, p = 0.017.
    UNASSIGNED: The study confirmed tissue perfusion increase could be detected using NIRS during revascularization of below the knee arteries. An intraoperative increase of NIRS rSO 2 proved to predict wound healing results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已经建立了使用诸如药物涂层球囊(DCB)和药物洗脱支架(DES)之类的设备治疗股pop动脉粥样硬化性疾病的血管内治疗(EVT)。然而,EVT使用基于药物的设备治疗慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)仍然具有挑战性。CLTI患者FP病变的最佳装置仍不清楚。本研讨比拟了DCB和DES对CLTI和FP病变患者的临床疗效。方法和结果:这项回顾性单中心研究包括2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受EVT治疗的539例连续患者(562个病灶);166例CLTI和卢瑟福5级或6级伤口患者接受DCB或DES的EVT治疗。在倾向评分匹配后,对53对患者的临床结果进行比较。DCB组和DES组在伤口完全愈合而无死亡或严重截肢的发生率方面没有显着差异(84.8%vs.80.2%,分别为;P=0.99),原发性通畅性(69.4%vs.75.6%,分别为;P=0.65),1年无靶病变血运重建(78.6%vs.78.0%,分别为;P=0.92)。多因素分析显示,1年伤口完全愈合与血液透析和伤口,缺血,和足部感染阶段4,但与全球肢体解剖分期系统FP等级3或4呈正相关。
    结论:对于有CLTI和FP病变的患者,DCB和DES之间的临床结果没有发现显著差异。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy (EVT) with devices such as drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) for atherosclerotic disease in the femoropopliteal (FP) artery has been established. However, EVT using drug-based devices for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) remains challenging. The optimal device for FP lesions in patients with CLTI remains unknown. This study compared the clinical efficacy of DCB and DES in patients with CLTI and FP lesions.Methods and Results: This retrospective single-center study included 539 consecutive patients (562 lesions) treated with EVT between January 2018 and December 2022; 166 patients with CLTI and Rutherford Class 5 or 6 wounds underwent EVT with DCB or DES. Clinical outcomes were compared between 53 pairs after propensity score matching. There were no significant differences between the DCB and DES groups in the incidence of complete wound healing without death or major amputation (84.8% vs. 80.2%, respectively; P=0.99), primary patency (69.4% vs. 75.6%, respectively; P=0.65), and freedom from target lesion revascularization at 1 year (78.6% vs. 78.0%, respectively; P=0.92). Multivariate analysis showed that complete wound healing at 1 year is negatively associated with hemodialysis and Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection Stage 4, but positively associated with Global Limb Anatomic Staging System FP Grade 3 or 4.
    CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between DCB and DES for patients with CLTI and FP lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号