Objective.We aim to: (1) quantify the benefits of lung sparing using non-adaptive magnetic resonance guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) with advanced motion management for peripheral lung cancers compared to conventional x-ray guided SBRT (ConvSBRT); (2) establish a practical decision-making guidance metric to assist a clinician in selecting the appropriate treatment modality.Approach.Eleven patients with peripheral lung cancer who underwent breath-hold, gated MRgSBRT on an MR-guided linear accelerator (MR linac) were studied. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based retrospective planning using an internal target volume (ITV) was performed to simulate ConvSBRT, which were evaluated against the original MRgSBRT plans. Metrics analyzed included planning target volume (PTV) coverage, various lung metrics and the generalized equivalent unform dose (gEUD). A dosimetric predictor for achievable lung metrics was derived to assist future patient triage across modalities.Main results.PTV coverage was high (median V100% > 98%) and comparable for both modalities. MRgSBRT had significantly lower lung doses as measured by V20 (median 3.2% versus 4.2%), mean lung dose (median 3.3 Gy versus 3.8 Gy) and gEUD. Breath-hold, gated MRgSBRT resulted in an average reduction of 47% in PTV volume and an average increase of 19% in lung volume. Strong correlation existed between lung metrics and the ratio of PTV to lung volumes (RPTV/Lungs) for both modalities, indicating that RPTV/Lungsmay serve as a good predictor for achievable lung metrics without the need for pre-planning. A threshold value of RPTV/Lungs< 0.035 is suggested to achieve V20 < 10% using ConvSBRT. MRgSBRT should otherwise be considered if the threshold cannot be met.Significance.The benefits of lung sparing using MRgSBRT were quantified for peripheral lung tumors; RPTV/Lungswas found to be an effective predictor for achievable lung metrics across modalities. RPTV/Lungscan assist a clinician in selecting the appropriate modality without the need for labor-intensive pre-planning, which has significant practical benefit for a busy clinic.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) is routinely used for vascular evaluation. With existing techniques for CEMRA, diagnostic image quality is only obtained during the first pass of the contrast agent or shortly thereafter, whereas angiographic quality tends to be poor when imaging is delayed to the equilibrium phase. We hypothesized that prolonged blood pool contrast enhancement could be obtained by imaging with a balanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (bT1RESS) pulse sequence, which combines 3D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) with a saturation recovery magnetization preparation to impart T1 weighting and suppress background tissues. An electrocardiographic-gated, two-dimensional-accelerated version with isotropic 1.1-mm spatial resolution was evaluated for breath-hold equilibrium phase CEMRA of the thoracic aorta and heart.
METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board. Twenty-one subjects were imaged using unenhanced 3D bSSFP, time-resolved CEMRA, first-pass gated CEMRA, followed by early and late equilibrium phase gated CEMRA and bT1RESS. Nine additional subjects were imaged using equilibrium phase 3D bSSFP and bT1RESS. Images were evaluated for image quality, aortic root sharpness, and visualization of the coronary artery origins, as well as using standard quantitative measures.
RESULTS: Equilibrium phase bT1RESS provided better image quality, aortic root sharpness, and coronary artery origin visualization than gated CEMRA (P < 0.05), and improved image quality and aortic root sharpness versus unenhanced 3D bSSFP (P < 0.05). It provided significantly larger apparent signal-to-noise and apparent contrast-to-noise ratio values than gated CEMRA and unenhanced 3D bSSFP (P < 0.05) and provided ninefold better fluid suppression than equilibrium phase 3D bSSFP. Aortic diameter and main pulmonary artery diameter measurements obtained with bT1RESS and first-pass gated CEMRA strongly correlated (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We found that using bT1RESS greatly prolongs the useful duration of blood pool contrast enhancement while improving angiographic image quality compared with standard CEMRA techniques. Although further study is needed, potential advantages for vascular imaging include eliminating the current requirement for first-pass imaging along with better reliability and accuracy for a wide range of cardiovascular applications.

UNASSIGNED: Respiratory-triggered (RT) and breath-hold are the most common acquisition modalities for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). The present study compared the three different acquisition modalities for optimizing the use of MRCP in patients with diseases of the pancreatic and biliary systems.
UNASSIGNED: Three MRCP acquisition modalities were used in this study: conventional respiratory-triggered sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip evolutions (RT-SPACE), modified RT-SPACE, and breath-hold (BH)-SPACE. Fifty-eight patients with clinically suspected pancreatic and biliary system disease were included. All image data were acquired on a 1.5 T MR. Scan time and image quality were compared between the three acquisition modalities. Friedman test, which was followed by post-hoc analysis, was performed among triple-scan protocol.
UNASSIGNED: There was a significant difference in the mean acquisition time among conventional RT-SPACE, modified RT-SPACE, and BH-SPACE (167.41±32.11 seconds vs 50.84±73.78 seconds vs 18.00 seconds, P <0.001). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also significantly different among the three groups (P <0.001). The SNR and CNR were higher in the RT-SPACE group than in the BH-SPACE group (P <0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences (P >0.05) among the 3 groups regarding quality of overall image, image clarity, background inhibition, and visualization of the pancreatic and biliary system.
UNASSIGNED: MRCP acquisition with the modified RT-SPACE sequence greatly shortens the acquisition time with comparable quality images. The MRCP acquisition modality could be designed based on the patient\'s situation to improve the examination pass rate and obtain excellent images for diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of automated surface-guided gating for left-sided breast cancer with DIBH and VMAT.
METHODS: Patients treated in the first year after introduction of DIBH with VMAT were retrospectively considered for analysis. With automated surface-guided gating the beam automatically switches on/off, if the surface region of interest moved in/out the gating tolerance (±3 mm, ±3°). Patients were coached to hold their breath as long as comfortably possible. Depending on the patient\'s preference, patients received audio instructions during treatment delivery. Real-time positional variations of the breast/chest wall surface with respect to the reference surface were collected, for all three orthogonal directions. The durations and number of DIBHs needed to complete dose delivery, and DIBH position variations were determined. To evaluate an optimal gating window threshold, smaller tolerances of ±2.5 mm, ±2.0 mm, and ±1.5 mm were simulated.
RESULTS: 525 fractions from 33 patients showed that median DIBH duration was 51 s (range: 30-121 s), and median 4 DIBHs per fraction were needed to complete VMAT dose delivery. Median intra-DIBH stability and intrafractional DIBH reproducibility approximated 1.0 mm in each direction. No large differences were found between patients who preferred to perform the DIBH procedure with (n = 21) and without audio-coaching (n = 12). Simulations demonstrated that gating window tolerances could be reduced from ±3.0 mm to ±2.0 mm, without affecting beam-on status.
CONCLUSIONS: Independent of the use of audio-coaching, this study demonstrates that automated surface-guided gating with DIBH and VMAT proved highly efficient. Patients\' DIBH performance far exceeded our expectations compared to earlier experiences and literature. Furthermore, gating window tolerances could be reduced.

Background Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy may increase the risk of cardiovascular death due to possible heart irradiation. The reproducibility of the chest wall to heart distance in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) was studied using a laser sensor with visual feedback. Methodology A total of 10 consecutive postoperative left-sided breast cancer cases receiving DIBH radiotherapy between December 2022 and September 2023 were retrospectively investigated. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. An Anzai respiratory gating system, AZ-733VI (Anzai, Tokyo, Japan), was employed that has a laser displacement sensor and a visual feedback device. An Elekta linac with a cone-beam CT unit, Axesse (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), was used in this study. The interfractional changes in the chest wall to heart distance among 25 fractions were analyzed for each of the 10 patients in each coordinate axis. In addition, the median with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and interquartile range (IQR) for all 250 fractions were calculated in each axis to assess the reproducibility of our DIBH technique. Results The medians of the interfractional changes in the chest wall to heart distance in each of the 10 patients ranged from -2 mm to 3 mm, -1 mm to 3 mm, and -2 mm to 1 mm in the lateral (X), superior-inferior (Y), and anterior-posterior (Z) directions, respectively. For all 10 cases, the medians were 1 mm (95% CI = 0.72 to 1.28 mm) in X, 1 mm (95% CI = 0.76 to 1.24 mm) in Y, and 0 mm (95% CI = -0.20 to 0.20 mm) in Z directions, whereas the IQRs were 4 mm in X, 2 mm in Y and 2 mm in Z directions. The measured IQRs were two to three times smaller than those shown in a previous report without visual feedback, suggesting a clinical advantage of the visual feedback in DIBH for left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. The DIBH solution shown in this study required approximately 10 minutes from room-in to room-out, thereby not reducing the daily number of patients. Conclusions Our DIBH approach with visual feedback achieved better distance reproducibility between the chest wall and heart by a factor of two to three in terms of IQR compared to the previously reported data without visual feedback. Patient throughput was also favorable. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the chest wall to heart distance reproducibility in DIBH with visual feedback.

BACKGROUND: Breath-hold volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (BH-VIBE) of multiphase contrast-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging (MPCE-LMRI) requires good cooperative individuals to comply with multiple breath-holds.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a free-breathing modified VIBE (FB-mVIBE) as a substitute of BH-VIBE in MPCE-LMRI.
METHODS: We modified VIBE with a high acceleration factor (2 × 2) and four averages to produce the mVIBE scan. A total of 90 individuals (40 men; mean age = 54.6 ± 10.0 years) who had received MPCE-LMRI as part of a voluntary health check-up for oncology survey were enrolled. Each participant was scanned in four phases (pre-contrast, arterial phase, venous phase, and delay phase), and each phase had two sequential scans. To encounter the timing effect of contrast enhancement, three scan orders were designed: BH-VIBE and FB-mVIBE (group A, n = 30); BH-VIBE and FB-VIBE (group B, n = 30); and FB-mVIBE and BH-VIBE (group C, n = 30). The comparisons included the objective measurements and 25 visual-score by two abdominal radiologists independently.
RESULTS: Consistency between raters was observed for all three sequences (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.741-0.829). For rater 1, the mean scores of FB-mVIBE (23.67 ± 1.32) were equal to those of BH-VIBE (23.83 ± 1.98) in groups C and B (P = 0.852). The mean scores of FB-mVIBE (22.07 ± 3.02), but significantly higher than those of FB-VIBE (14.7 ± 3.41) in groups A and B (P <0.001). Similar scores were found for rater 2. The objective measurement of FB-mVIBE were equal to or higher than BH-VIBE and markedly superior to FB-VIBE.
CONCLUSIONS: FB-mVIBE is a practical alternative to BH-VIBE for individuals who cannot cooperate with multiple breath-holds for MPCE-LMRI.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the magnitude of physiological strain imposed by repeated maximal static and dynamic apneas through assessing a panel of stress-related biomarkers.
METHODS: Eleven healthy men performed on three separate occasions (≥72-h apart): a series of five repeated maximal (i) static (STA) or (ii) dynamic apneas (DYN) or (iii) a static eupneic protocol (CTL). Venous blood samples were drawn at 30, 90, and 180-min after each protocol to determine ischaemia modified albumin (IMA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), myoglobin, and high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) concentrations.
RESULTS: IMA was elevated after the apnoeic interventions (STA,+86%;DYN,+332%,p ≤ 0.047) but not CTL (p = 0.385). Myoglobin was higher than baseline (23.6 ± 3.9 ng/mL) 30-min post DYN (+70%,38.8 ± 13.3 ng/mL,p = 0.030). A greater myoglobin release was recorded in DYN compared with STA and CTL (p ≤ 0.035). No changes were observed in NSE (p = 0.207) or hscTnT (p = 0.274).
CONCLUSIONS: Five repeated maximal DYN led to a greater muscle injury compared with STA but neither elicited myocardial injury or neuronal-parenchymal damage.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely used to understand the neurodevelopmental changes that occur in cognition and behavior across childhood. The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal obtained from fMRI is understood to be comprised of both neuronal and vascular information. However, it is unclear whether the vascular response is altered across age in studies investigating development in children. Since the breath-hold (BH) task is commonly used to understand cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) in fMRI studies, it can be used to account for developmental differences in vascular response. This study examines how the cerebrovascular response changes over age in a longitudinal children\'s BH data set from the Nathan Kline Institute (NKI) Rockland Sample (aged 6-18 years old at enrollment). A general linear model approach was applied to derive CVR from BH data. To model both the longitudinal and cross-sectional effects of age on BH response, we used mixed-effects modeling with the following terms: linear, quadratic, logarithmic, and quadratic-logarithmic, to find the best-fitting model. We observed increased BH BOLD signals in multiple networks across age, in which linear and logarithmic mixed-effects models provided the best fit with the lowest Akaike information criterion scores. This shows that the cerebrovascular response increases across development in a brain network-specific manner. Therefore, fMRI studies investigating the developmental period should account for cerebrovascular changes that occur with age.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most widespread cancer in women and young women worldwide. Moving towards customised radiotherapy, balancing the use of the available technology with the best treatment modality may not be an easy task in the daily routine. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing IQ-feasibility into clinical practice to support the decision of free-breathing (FB) versus breath-hold (BH) left-sided breast irradiations, in order to optimise the technology available and the effectiveness of the treatment.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients who received 3D radiotherapy treatment of the left breast in deep-inspiration BH were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography scans in FB and BH were acquired for each patient; targets contoured in both imaging datasets by an experienced radiation oncologist, and organs at risk delineated using automatic segmentation software were exported to PlanIQ™ (Sun Nuclear Corp.) to generate feasibility dose volume histogram (FDVHs). The dosimetric parameter of BH versus FB FDVH, and BH clinical dataset versus BH FDVH were compared.
RESULTS: A total of 30 patients out of 35 patients analysed, presented for the BH treatments a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the heart mean dose ([Formula: see text]), volume receiving 5 Gy ([Formula: see text]) and 20 Gy ([Formula: see text]), of 35.7%, 54.5%, and 2.1%, respectively; for the left lung, a lower reduction was registered and significant only for [Formula: see text] (21.4%, p = 0.046). For the remaining five patients, the FDVH cut-off points of heart and lung were superimposable with differences of less than 1%. Heart and left lung dosimetric parameters of the BH clinical plans are located in the difficult zone of the FDVH and differ significantly (p < 0.05) from the corresponding parameters of the FDVH curves delimiting this buffer area between the impossible and feasible zones, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PlanIQTM as a decision-support tool for the FB versus BH treatment delivery modality allows customisation of the treatment technique using the most appropriate technology for each patient enabling accurate management of available technologies.

UNASSIGNED: Intrafractional motion constitutes a significant challenge in SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy).The breath-hold (BH) technique is employed to mitigate tumor motion; however, ensuring reproducibility and consistency remains critically important. Surface tracking systems, integrated into the treatment process, facilitate motion tracking through three-dimensional camera technology. Surface guidance has been incorporated with Varian EDGE (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and has been utilized at multiple treatment sites within our department since 2018. Drawing on four years of experience, this study aims to publish patient experience, assess the feasibility, and evaluate the tolerability of breath-hold during SBRT with surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT), particularly focusing on a specific subgroup: patients with liver metastases.
UNASSIGNED: Prospective evaluation was conducted on patients with liver metastases undergoing breath-hold SBRT with SGRT. A two-step survey consisting of seven questions was administered after CT simulation and treatment. Treatment duration and the number of breath-holds were recorded. Additionally, factors potentially influencing SGRT and treatment time were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Between April 2021 and May 2022, a total of 41 patients underwent 171 fractions of treatment. According to the questionnaire, prior training was found to be beneficial, and breath-holding during the procedure was tolerable. Patients reported experiencing slight stress due to their active participation in the treatment. Factors such as Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), age, lung volume, conditions affecting lung capacity, previous breath-hold history, and being a native speaker showed no correlation with treatment time. Moreover, these factors did not correlate with the tolerability of breath-hold during SGRT. However, female patients showed better breath-holding performance in SGRT treatments compared to male patients (p: 0.02).
UNASSIGNED: The application of breath-hold with SGRT procedures is tolerable and feasible in liver SBRT treatments. There exists no specific subgroup that cannot tolerate this method.