This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated post-biopsy manoeuvres to reduce pneumothorax following computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy. Twenty-one articles were included with 7080 patients. Chest drain insertion rates were significantly reduced by ninefold with the normal saline tract sealant compared to controls (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.48), threefold with the rapid rollover manoeuvre to puncture site down (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.63), threefold with the tract plug (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.48) and threefold with the blood patch (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.58). The absolute chest drain insertion rates were the lowest in the normal saline tract sealant (0.8% vs 7.3% for controls), rapid rollover (1.9% vs 5.2%), deep expiration and breath-hold on needle extraction (0.9% vs 1.8%) and standard rollover versus no rollover (2.6% vs 5.2%). These findings highlight post-biopsy manoeuvres which could help reduce pneumothorax and chest drain insertions following lung biopsies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1/no level of evidence, systematic review.

Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is the cerebral hemodynamic response to a vasoactive substance. Breath-hold (BH) induced CVR has the advantage of being non-invasive and easy to implement during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We systematically reviewed the literature regarding MRI measurement of BH induced CVR. The literature was searched using MEDLINE with the search terms breath-hold; and MRI or cerebrovascular reactivity. The search yielded 2244 results and 54 articles were included. Between-group comparisons have found that CVR was higher among healthy controls than patients with various pathologies (e.g. sleep apnea, diabetes, hypertension etc.). However, counter-intuitive findings have also been reported, including higher CVR among smokers, sedentary individuals, and patients with schizophrenia vs.
METHODS: Methodological studies have highlighted important measurement characteristics (e.g. normalizing signal to end-tidal CO2), and comparisons of BH induced CVR to non-BH methods. Future studies are warranted to address questions about group differences, treatment response, disease progression, and other salient clinical themes. Standardization of CVR and BH designs is needed to fully exploit the potential of this practical non-invasive method.