broth microdilution

肉汤微量稀释
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术耐多药革兰氏阴性菌在全球范围内的不断上升对患者安全提出了越来越大的威胁。在过去的十年里,耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)已成为医院获得性感染中最关键的病原体之一,特别是在重症监护室。粘菌素已经成为用于对抗由CRE引起的感染的最后的抗微生物剂之一。然而,粘菌素的使用伴随着粘菌素抗性细菌的患病率显着增加。本研究旨在研究肠杆菌顺序成员中质粒介导的粘菌素抗性基因,范围从mcr-1到mcr-8。材料和方法这项前瞻性研究于2021年5月1日至2022年7月31日在Afyonkarahisar健康科学大学健康研究与实践中心的微生物学实验室进行。从各个诊所发送的所有培养阳性临床样品中获得了总共2646种肠杆菌分离株。其中,该研究包括79个对碳青霉烯类抗生素具有抗性的分离株。在79个分离株中,在27个对粘菌素具有抗性的分离株中研究了mcr-1至mcr-8基因的存在。使用VITEK2自动化系统(bioMérieux,美国)。使用肉汤微量稀释技术(ComASP™Colistin,Liofilchem,意大利),按照制造商的说明。结果在我们的体外研究中,美罗培南的最小抑制浓度(MIC)值被确定为>8µg/ml,而粘菌素,MIC50值>16µg/ml,MIC90值为8µg/ml.在分析的79株耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌菌株中,共鉴定出27株耐粘菌素菌株。粘菌素耐药菌株中最普遍的药物是肺炎克雷伯菌(K。肺炎),占分离株的66.7%。其次是Proteusmirabilis(P.mirabilis)与29.6%和大肠杆菌(E.大肠杆菌)占3.7%。耐碳青霉烯类菌株对粘菌素的耐药率为34.2%,通过肉汤微量稀释法测试的菌株中粘菌素的MIC值范围为4至>16µg/ml浓度。在聚合酶链反应(PCR)研究中,通过实时PCR在阳性对照分离株中成功检测到mcr-1基因区。然而,在我们使用多重PCR试剂盒调查质粒介导基因的存在的研究中,没有发现从mcr-1到mcr-8的基因区域。结论虽然我们的研究表明耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌分离株粘菌素耐药率增加,它导致无法通过多重PCR方法检测从mcr-1到mcr-8的基因。因此,结论是,在我们地区的肠杆菌科分离物中观察到的粘菌素抗性不是由于筛选的mcr基因,而是不同的抗性发展机制。
    Background The escalating global rise in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria presents an increasingly substantial threat to patient safety. Over the past decade, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have emerged as one of the most critical pathogens in hospital-acquired infections, notably within intensive care units. Colistin has become one of the last-resort antimicrobial agents utilized to combat infections caused by CRE. However, the use of colistin has been accompanied by a notable increase in the prevalence of colistin-resistant bacteria. This study aimed to investigate plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes ranging from mcr-1 to mcr-8 among members of the Enterobacterales order. Materials and methods This prospective study was conducted in the microbiology laboratory of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Health Research and Practice Center between May 1, 2021 and July 31, 2022. A total of 2,646 Enterobacterales isolates were obtained from all culture-positive clinical samples sent from various clinics. Of these, 79 isolates exhibiting resistance to carbapenem antibiotics were included in the study. Among the 79 isolates, the presence of mcr-1 to mcr-8 genes was investigated in 27 isolates that were shown to be resistant to colistin. The identification of bacteria at the species level and antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted using the VITEK 2 automated system (bioMérieux, USA). Colistin resistance among Enterobacterales strains exhibiting carbapenem resistance was evaluated using the broth microdilution technique (ComASP™ Colistin, Liofilchem, Italy), in accordance with the manufacturer\'s instructions. Results In our in vitro investigations, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for meropenem were determined to be >8 µg/ml, whereas for colistin, the MIC50 value was >16 µg/ml and the MIC90 value was 8 µg/ml. A total of 27 colistin-resistant strains were identified among the 79 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales strains analyzed. The most prevalent agent among colistin-resistant strains was Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), representing 66.7% of the isolates. This was followed by Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) with 29.6% and Escherichia coli (E. coli) with 3.7%. The colistin resistance rate among carbapenem-resistant strains was found to be 34.2%, with colistin MIC values in strains tested by the broth microdilution method ranging from 4 to >16 µg/ml concentrations. In polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies, the mcr-1 gene region was successfully detected by real-time PCR in the positive control isolate. Nevertheless, none of the gene regions from mcr-1 to mcr-8 were identified in our study investigating the presence of plasmid-mediated genes using a multiplex PCR kit. Conclusion Although our study demonstrated the presence of increased colistin resistance rates in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates, it resulted in the failure to detect genes from mcr-1 to mcr-8 by the multiplex PCR method. Therefore, it is concluded that the colistin resistance observed in Enterobacteriaceae isolates in our region is not due to the mcr genes screened, but to different resistance development mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管一线推荐磷霉素治疗简单的尿路感染(UTI),优化其用于治疗非大肠杆菌肠杆菌UTI的用途存在紧迫的障碍。没有批准的针对其他肠杆菌的口服断点,并且推荐的琼脂稀释(AD)参考方法用于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)测定在很大程度上是不切实际的。使用160株临床肺炎克雷伯菌,我们试图了解肉汤微量稀释(BMD)中的跳孔率和MIC不精确性,以及这与使用AD时的错误率的比较.尽管临床和实验室标准研究所在他们反对使用BMD的建议中提到了跳井现象,关于其频率的数据很少。虽然AD和BMD产生相似的MIC50/90值(AD为32/256µg/mL,BMD为64/256µg/mL),基本协议很差。在给定浓度下,浓度低于MIC的无生长孔出现在高达10.9%的孔中,最常见的科学错误。在高达3.3%的孔中发生高于测量的MIC的浓度的生长,并且在BMD的MIC的三个稀释度内观察到。观察到处于或超过AD测得的MIC的单菌落也很常见,发生时间高达8.3%和2.5%,分别。两种测试方法中频繁出现的科学错误应促使重新评估AD指南和扩展磷霉素敏感性测试的MIC测试方法,因为与另一种容易产生科学错误的方法的不良一致性不应该是BMD使用的主要利弊。IMPORTANCEAlthoughtherecommendedoffosfomycinforuncomplicated尿路感染(UTIs),优化其使用存在障碍。没有批准的针对其他肠杆菌的口服断点,建议的琼脂稀释(AD)参考方法用于MIC测定在很大程度上是不切实际的。临床和实验室标准研究所不建议使用肉汤微量稀释(BMD)进行磷霉素测试,因为精度不令人满意,并且跳过了孔-在最小抑制浓度(MIC)之前在单个孔中出现无生长-和尾随终点。我们试图了解跳过孔的速率和在BMD中测得的MIC以上的浓度下的生长,以及如何将其与使用AD的科学误差进行比较。对于BMD,在高达10.9%的孔中出现低于MIC的浓度的无生长孔,并且对于AD,处于或超过测量的MIC的单菌落也是常见的。两种方法中频繁出现的科学错误应促使重新评估AD和BMD以进行磷霉素敏感性测试。
    Despite the first-line recommendation of fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), there are pressing barriers for optimizing its use for the treatment of non-Escherichia coli Enterobacterales UTI. There are no approved breakpoints for oral use against other Enterobacterales, and the recommended agar dilution (AD) reference method for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination is largely impractical. Using 160 clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, we sought to understand rates of skipped wells and MIC imprecision in broth microdilution (BMD) and how that compares to rates of error using AD. Though the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute refers to the skipped well phenomena in their recommendation against the use of BMD, there is a paucity of data on its frequency. While AD and BMD produced similar MIC50/90 values (32/256 µg/mL for AD and 64/256 µg/mL for BMD), essential agreement was poor. No-growth wells at concentrations below the MIC occurred in up to 10.9% of wells at a given concentration, as the most frequent scientific error. Growth in concentrations above the measured MIC occurred in up to 3.3% of wells and was seen within three dilutions of the MIC for BMD. Observation of single colonies either at or beyond the measured MIC for AD was also common and occurred up to 8.3% and 2.5% of the time, respectively. The frequent scientific error in both testing methods should prompt re-evaluation of AD guidelines and expansion of MIC testing methods for fosfomycin susceptibility testing, as poor agreement with another method prone to scientific error should not be the main detractor from BMD use.IMPORTANCEDespite the recommendation of fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), there are barriers for optimizing its use. There are no approved breakpoints for oral use against other Enterobacterales, and the recommended agar dilution (AD) reference method for MIC determination is largely impractical. The use of broth microdilution (BMD) for fosfomycin testing is not recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute due to unsatisfactory precision and skipped wells-occurrence of no-growth in a single well before the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)-and trailing endpoints. We sought to understand rates of skipped wells and growth at concentrations above measured MICs in BMD and how that compares to scientific error using AD. No-growth wells at concentrations below the MIC occurred in up to 10.9% of wells for BMD and single colonies at or beyond measured MICs for AD were also common. Frequent scientific error in both methods should prompt re-evaluation of both AD and BMD for fosfomycin susceptibility testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血流感染(BSIs)的快速抗菌药物敏感性测试(AST)有助于优化抗菌治疗,预防抗菌素耐药性并改善患者预后。QMAC-dRAST(QuantaMatrixInc.,韩国)是基于微流控芯片技术的快速AST平台,直接使用阳性血培养肉汤(PBCB)进行AST。本研究使用PBCB和传代培养的菌落分离物评估了QMAC-dRAST对革兰氏阴性菌的性能,将其与VITEK2(bioMérieux,法国)使用肉汤微量稀释(BMD)作为参考方法。
    方法:我们纳入了141个来自BSI患者的革兰氏阴性血培养分离株和12个产碳青霉烯酶的肠杆菌临床分离株,这些临床分离株被添加到血培养瓶中。使用PBCB和菌落分离物评估QMAC-dRAST性能,而VITEK2和BMD仅在菌落分离株上进行测试。
    结果:对于PBCB,QMAC-dRAST达成了92.1%的分类协议(CA),95.3%基本协议(EA),1.8%的非常大错误(VME),3.5%主要错误(ME),和5.2%的小错误(mE)。有了菌落分离株,它表现出92.5%的CA和95.1%的EA,2.0%的中小微企业,3.2%的MEs,和4.8%的MEE。VITEK2显示94.1%CA和96.0%EA,4.3%的中小微企业,0.4%MEs,和4.3%的MES。QMAC-dRAST对特定的抗菌剂产生了较高的错误率,碳青霉烯类和氨基糖苷类具有较高的VME。PBCB样品获得QMAC-dRAST的中位时间为5.9h,传代培养的菌落分离株为6.1h。
    结论:QMAC-dRAST系统表现出与VITEK2系统相当的优势和性能;然而,挑战被识别为特定的抗微生物剂,强调改进的必要性。
    BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method.
    METHODS: We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates.
    RESULTS: For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates.
    CONCLUSIONS: The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌(CRE)的报道被测试为头孢吡肟敏感(S)或易感剂量依赖性(SDD)。然而,没有数据可以比较BDPhoenix自动药敏系统(BDPhoenix)和圆盘扩散(DD)相对于参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)对产碳青霉烯酶(CPblaKPC-CRE)和非产(非CPCRE)分离株的头孢吡肟检测性能.根据CLSIM100Ed32解释头孢吡肟敏感性结果。基本协议(EA),绝对协议(CA),小错误(MIE),主要错误(ME),计算BDPhoenix(NMIC-306革兰氏阴性图)和DD相对于BMD的非常大的误差(VME)。还通过错误率有界方法分析了相关性。对于BDPhoenix,CPblaKPC-CRE分离株(n=64)的EA和CA<90%,而在非CPCRE分离株(n=58)中,EA和CA为96.6%,和79.3%,分别。两个队列的CA均<90%,DD。任一分离组均未观察到ME或VME;然而,通过BDPhoenix和DD测试,CPblaKPC-CRE和非CPCRE的miE>10%。对于错误率有界方法,对于具有BDPhoenix的CPblaKPC-CRE和非CPCRE,IHigh+1至IILow-1范围的miE<40%。关于磁盘扩散,对于CPblaKPC-CRE中的所有MIC范围,miE都是不可接受的。对于非CPCRE分离株,只有IHigh+1到ILow-1范围是可以接受的,为37.2%。使用这个挑战组的基因型-表型不一致的CRE,相对于参考BMD结果,BDPhoenixMIC和DD易感性结果呈较高趋势(朝向SDD和抗性表型),从而产生较低的CA。这些结果在CPblaKPC-CRE中比非CPCRE更为突出。
    There are increasing reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that test as cefepime-susceptible (S) or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD). However, there are no data to compare the cefepime testing performance of BD Phoenix automated susceptibility system (BD Phoenix) and disk diffusion (DD) relative to reference broth microdilution (BMD) against carbapenemase-producing (CPblaKPC-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP CRE) isolates. Cefepime susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI M100Ed32. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (miEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for BD Phoenix (NMIC-306 Gram-negative panel) and DD relative to BMD. Correlates were also analyzed by the error rate-bounded method. EA and CA for CPblaKPC-CRE isolates (n = 64) were <90% with BD Phoenix while among non-CP CRE isolates (n = 58), EA and CA were 96.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. CA was <90% with DD for both cohorts. No ME or VME was observed for either isolate cohort; however, miEs were >10% for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 ranges for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix. Regarding disk diffusion, miEs were unacceptable for all MIC ranges among CPblaKPC-CRE. For non-CP CRE isolates, only IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 range was acceptable at 37.2%. Using this challenge set of genotypic-phenotypic discordant CRE, the BD Phoenix MICs and DD susceptibility results trended higher (toward SDD and resistant phenotypes) relative to reference BMD results yielding lower CA. These results were more prominent among CPblaKPC-CRE than non-CP CRE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在开发一种用于Avibacterium(Av。)副鸡,鸡传染性鼻炎的病原体。为此,共83Av。从15个国家收集了副鸡的分离株和菌株。要为方法验证步骤选择不相关的隔离,用15个Av进行宏观限制分析.paragallinarum.可见Av的增长。在六种肉汤培养基中检查了副鸡,并编制了生长曲线。在兽医Fastidious培养基和阳离子调节的Mueller-Hinton肉汤(CAMHB)+1%鸡血清+0.0025%NADH(CAMHBCSNADH)中,检测到所有分离物的可见生长,并且两种培养基都允许足够的细菌生长。由于Av的可读性更好。副鸡在微量滴定板中的生长,选择CAMHB+CS+NADH用于AST。在35±2°C下孵育48小时后,使用一组24种抗菌剂对5种流行病学无关的分离物进行MIC测试的重复导致了96%-100%的高必需MIC协议。因此,剩下的78Av。使用所提出的方法对副鸡进行了测试并证明了易于阅读的MIC。在来自不同大陆的分离株之间检测到中等收入国家的差异,与来自美国和欧洲的分离株相比,来自非洲的分离株显示出更低的中等收入国家,更常见的是氨基糖苷类药物的MIC升高,喹诺酮类药物,四环素,和/或甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑。用于方法开发的分离株的PCR分析显示,四环素MIC升高的分离株具有四环素抗性基因tet(B),但未检测到其他测试的抗性基因。因此,来自62个Av的全基因组测序数据。对副鸡进行了分析,发现存在与aph(6)-Id基因具有核苷酸序列同一性的序列,aph(3″)-Ib,blaTEM-1B,catA2,sul2,tet(B),tet(H),和mcr一样。总的来说,拟议的方法使用CAMHBCSNADH进行敏感性测试,在35±2°C的环境空气中孵育48小时,适用于Av。paragallinarum.由于检测到多种抗性基因,强烈建议开发临床断点。
    目的:副鸡副细菌是引起鸡传染性鼻炎的重要兽医学病原。由于抗生素通常用于治疗并且已知病原体的抗性,应在病原体的抗性测试后给予靶向治疗。不幸的是,目前,标准中没有可接受的方法可以对这种挑剔的病原体进行敏感性测试。因此,我们已经制定了一种方法,可以对病原体进行统一的敏感性测试。该方法符合CLSI的要求,可用于诊断实验室。
    This study aimed to develop a method for standardized broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Avibacterium (Av.) paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza in chickens. For this, a total of 83 Av. paragallinarum isolates and strains were collected from 15 countries. To select unrelated isolates for method validation steps, macrorestriction analyses were performed with 15 Av. paragallinarum. The visible growth of Av. paragallinarum was examined in six broth media and growth curves were compiled. In Veterinary Fastidious Medium and cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) + 1% chicken serum + 0.0025% NADH (CAMHB + CS + NADH), visible growth of all isolates was detected and both media allowed adequate bacterial growth. Due to the better readability of Av. paragallinarum growth in microtiter plates, CAMHB + CS + NADH was chosen for AST. Repetitions of MIC testing with five epidemiologically unrelated isolates using a panel of 24 antimicrobial agents resulted in high essential MIC agreements of 96%-100% after 48-h incubation at 35 ± 2°C. Hence, the remaining 78 Av. paragallinarum were tested and demonstrated easily readable MICs with the proposed method. Differences in MICs were detected between isolates from different continents, with isolates from Africa showing lower MICs compared to isolates from America and Europe, which more often showed elevated MICs of aminoglycosides, quinolones, tetracyclines, and/or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. PCR analyses of isolates used for method development revealed that isolates with elevated MICs of tetracyclines harbored the tetracycline resistance gene tet(B) but none of the other tested resistance genes were detected. Therefore, whole-genome sequencing data from 62 Av. paragallinarum were analyzed and revealed the presence of sequences showing nucleotide sequence identity to the genes aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, blaTEM-1B, catA2, sul2, tet(B), tet(H), and mcr-like. Overall, the proposed method using CAMHB + CS + NADH for susceptibility testing with 48-h incubation time at 35 ± 2°C in ambient air was shown to be suitable for Av. paragallinarum. Due to a variety of resistance genes detected, the development of clinical breakpoints is highly recommended.
    Avibacterium paragallinarum is an important pathogen in veterinary medicine that causes infectious coryza in chickens. Since antibiotics are often used for treatment and resistance of the pathogen is known, targeted therapy should be given after resistance testing of the pathogen. Unfortunately, there is currently no accepted method in standards that allows susceptibility testing of this fastidious pathogen. Therefore, we have worked out a method that allows harmonized susceptibility testing of the pathogen. The method meets the requirements of the CLSI and could be used by diagnostic laboratories.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)或欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)等组织为各种非挑剔和挑剔的细菌提供了抗菌药物敏感性测试的标准化方法。但到目前为止还没有支原体。动物起源。最近,提出了一种使用商业Sensittre微量滴定板对猪鼻支原体进行标准化肉汤微量稀释测试的方法。在这项研究中,我们用37种现场分离物评估了这种肉汤微量稀释方法,并测试了它们对以下抗菌剂的敏感性:多西环素,恩诺沙星,红霉素,氟苯尼考,庆大霉素,马波沙星,四环素,tiamulin,替米考星,泰拉霉素,还有泰乐菌素.这些分离株来自不同的国家,隔离站点,和几年。使用改良的Friis肉汤作为培养物和测试培养基进行肉汤微量稀释方法。对于大环内酯类和lincosamides,几乎一半的测试现场分离株可以观察到MIC值升高的双峰分布,推断对这些物质的敏感性降低。根据最近发布的协议,我们能够测试各种野外分离株,可以获得一致的数据。使用此方法,猪鼻支原体分离株的监测研究可以以类似的方式进行,并且可以筛选观察到的敏感性曲线,以了解将来MIC值的可能变化。
    Organizations like the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) or the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) provide standardized methodologies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of a wide range of nonfastidious and fastidious bacteria, but so far not for Mycoplasma spp. of animal origin. Recently, a proposed method for the standardized broth microdilution testing of Mycoplasma hyorhinis using commercial Sensititre microtiter plates was presented. In this study, we evaluated this broth microdilution method with 37 field isolates and tested their susceptibility toward the following antimicrobial agents: doxycycline, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, florfenicol, gentamicin, marbofloxacin, tetracycline, tiamulin, tilmicosin, tulathromycin, and tylosin. The isolates originated from different countries, isolation sites, and years. The broth microdilution method was carried out using a modified Friis broth as the culture and test medium. For macrolides and lincosamides, a bimodal distribution with elevated MIC values could be observed for almost half of the tested field isolates, deducing reduced susceptibility toward these substances. With a recently published protocol, we were able to test a variety of field isolates, and consistent data could be obtained. Using this method, monitoring studies of Mycoplasma hyorhinis isolates can be carried out in a comparable manner, and the observed susceptibility profiles can be screened for possible changes in MIC values in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假伯克霍尔德菌对许多抗生素具有内在抗性。本研究旨在评估细菌菌落形态类型以及使用圆盘扩散法(DD)确定马来西亚临床假单胞菌分离株对头孢他啶(CAZ)的抗生素抗性的有效性。美罗培南(MEM),阿莫西林-克拉维酸(AMC)和多西环素(DOX)。DD产生了良好的分类协议,与参考方法具有100%的一致性,CAZ和DOX的肉汤微量稀释,MEM为98.6%,AMC为97.2%。最常观察到以平滑为中心的菌落。EUCASTDD解释标准适用于解释假链状芽孢杆菌CAZ,MEM,AMC和DOX抗性。增加假单胞菌的AMCMIC是一个问题。
    Burkholderia pseudomallei is intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics. This study aimed to assess bacterial colony morphotypes and the validity of using disk diffusion method (DD) to determine antibiotic resistance in Malaysian clinical B. pseudomallei isolates for ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MEM), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) and doxycycline (DOX). DD produced good categorical agreements exhibiting concordance of 100% with reference method, broth microdilution for CAZ and DOX, 98.6% for MEM and 97.2% for AMC. Smooth-centred colonies were most frequently observed. EUCAST DD interpretative criterion is suitable to interpret B. pseudomallei CAZ, MEM, AMC and DOX resistance. Increasing AMC MIC in B. pseudomallei is a concern.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2017年,美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)建立了抗菌素耐药性实验室网络,以改善国内对多重耐药生物的检测。CDC和四个实验室评估了商业肉汤微量稀释面板。使用敏感GN7F(ThermoFisherScientific,Lenexa,KS)通过测试100个CDC和食品药品监督管理局ARIsolateBank分离株[40个肠杆菌(ENT),30铜绿假单胞菌(PSA),和30鲍曼不动杆菌(ACB)]。我们评估了接种物和管状11mL阳离子调节的Mueller-Hinton肉汤之间的多个转移体积(TV):1µL[仅Proteeae部落(P部落)]和10、30和50µL,导致每毫升的CFU分别为1×104、1×105、3×105和5×105。分析了四种电视组合:标准(STD)[1微升(P-部落)和10微升],增强型标准品(E-STD)[1微升(P-部落)和30微升],30微升,和50微升。基本协议(EA),绝对协议,主要错误(ME),和非常主要的错误(VME)通过生物体然后电视进行分析。对于ENT,使用STD和E-STD电视的15种β-内酰胺中的7种的实验室平均EA<90%。随着电视的增加,EA增加(>90%),和VME减少。对于PSA,EA随着电视的增加而改善;但是,ME也增加了。对于ACB,增加的电视提供了轻微的EA改进;所有电视都产生了多个VME和ME。对于ENT和ACB,使用1或10微升电视时,最小抑制浓度(MIC)呈下降趋势;电视对PSA没有明显的MIC趋势。耐药性缺失的公共卫生和临床后果保证GN7F的电视增加30微升,尤其是对P部落来说,尽管被认为是“标签外”使用。
    In 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network to improve domestic detection of multidrug-resistant organisms. CDC and four laboratories evaluated a commercial broth microdilution panel. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the Sensititre GN7F (ThermoFisher Scientific, Lenexa, KS) was evaluated by testing 100 CDC and Food and Drug Administration AR Isolate Bank isolates [40 Enterobacterales (ENT), 30 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA), and 30 Acinetobacter baumannii (ACB)]. We assessed multiple amounts of transfer volume (TV) between the inoculum and tubed 11-mL cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth: 1 µL [tribe Proteeae (P-tribe) only] and 10, 30, and 50 µL, resulting in respective CFU per milliter of 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 3 × 105, and 5 × 105. Four TV combinations were analyzed: standard (STD) [1 µL (P-tribe) and 10 µL], enhanced standard (E-STD) [1 µL (P-tribe) and 30 µL], 30 µL, and 50 µL. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement, major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were analyzed by organism then TVs. For ENT, the average EA across laboratories was <90% for 7 of 15 β-lactams using STD and E-STD TVs. As TVs increased, EA increased (>90%), and VMEs decreased. For PSA, EA improved as TVs increased; however, MEs also increased. For ACB, increased TVs provided slight EA improvements; all TVs yielded multiple VMEs and MEs. For ENT and ACB, Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) trended downward using a 1 or 10 µL TV; there were no obvious MIC trends by TV for PSA. The public health and clinical consequences of missing resistance warrant increased TV of 30 µL for the GN7F, particularly for P-tribe, despite being considered \"off-label\" use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不断增加的抗生素耐药性,例如耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)的出现,耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB),和耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)导致使用有毒和较老的药物,如粘菌素用于这些生物。但是在世界范围内,甚至对染色体和质粒介导的粘菌素的抗性也在增加。这就需要准确检测电阻。这受到无法用于常规临床微生物学实践的用户友好的表型方法的阻碍。本研究试图评估两种不同的方法-Vitek两种方法的粘菌素肉汤圆盘洗脱和MIC检测,与CLSI批准的用于肠杆菌的粘菌素微量稀释(BMD)相比,铜绿假单胞菌,和鲍曼不动杆菌临床分离株。
    6013个碳青霉烯类耐药菌株的粘菌素敏感性通过BMD测定,粘菌素肉汤盘洗脱液(CBDE),和Vitek两种方法,并按照CLSI指南进行解释。CBDE的MIC结果,Vitek两人与BMD和基本一致(EA)进行了比较,绝对协议(CA),灵敏度,特异性,非常主要的错误(VME),计算了主要误差(ME)和科恩的卡帕(CK)。通过常规聚合酶链反应在所有粘菌素抗性分离株中评估了任何质粒介导的粘菌素抗性(mcr-1、2、3、4和5)的存在。
    在碳青霉烯类耐药菌株中,有778株(12.9%)对粘菌素耐药。通过BMD方法,肺炎克雷伯菌对粘菌素的耐药性最高(18.9%)。Vitek2的MIC敏感性为78.2-84.8%,特异性>92%。通过Vitek两种方法,有171个VME和323个MEs,远超过CLSI可接受范围。鲍曼不动杆菌的错误百分比最高(VME的27.8%和ME的7.9%)。另一方面,CBDE方法与EA表现良好,CA,VME和ME在所有生物体可接受的范围内。与黄金标准BMD相比,CBDE方法的灵敏度在不同菌株的97.5-98.8%之间变化,特异性超过97.6%。分离出的粘菌素抗性生物均未携带mcr质粒。
    由于BMD具有许多技术复杂性,CBDE是印度等国家最可行的替代方案。Vitek两人报告的敏感MIC需要仔细考虑,因为VME的高倾向,特别是克雷伯菌属。
    UNASSIGNED: The increasing antibiotic resistance like the advent of carbapenem resistant Enterobactarales (CRE), Carbapenem Resistant Acinetobacter baumanii (CRAB), and Carbapenem Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) has led to to the use of toxic and older drugs like colistin for these organisms. But worldwide there is an increase in resistance even to colistin mediated both by chromosomes and plasmids. This necessitates accurate detection of resistance. This is impeded by the unavailability of a user-friendly phenotypic methods for use in routine clinical microbiology practice. The present study attempts to evaluate two different methods - colistin broth disc elution and MIC detection by Vitek two in comparison to CLSI approved broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin for Enterobactarales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Acinetobacter baumanii clinical isolates.
    UNASSIGNED: Colistin susceptibility of 6013 carbapenem resistant isolates was determined by BMD, Colistin Broth Disc Elution (CBDE), and Vitek two methods and was interpreted as per CLSI guidelines. The MIC results of CBDE, Vitek two were compared with that of BMD and essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), sensitivity, specificity, very major error (VME), major error (ME) and Cohen\'s kappa (CK) was calculated. The presence of any plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) was evaluated in all colistin-resistant isolates by conventional polymerase chain reaction.
    UNASSIGNED: Colistin resistance was found in 778 (12.9 %) strains among the carbapenem resistant isolates. Klebsiella pneumoniae had the highest (18.9 %) colistin resistance by the BMD method. MIC of Vitek two had sensitivity ranging from 78.2-84.8% and specificity of >92 %. There were 171 VMEs and 323 MEs by Vitek two method, much more than CLSI acceptable range. The highest percentage of errors was committed for Acinetobacter baumanii (27.8 % of VME and 7.9 % ME). On the other hand, the CBDE method performed well with EA, CA, VME and ME within acceptable range for all the organisms. The sensitivity of the CBDE method compared to gold standard BMD varied from 97.5-98.8 % for different strains with a specificity of more than 97.6 %. None of the isolated colistin resistant organisms harboured mcr plasmids.
    UNASSIGNED: As BMD has many technical complexities, CBDE is the best viable alternative available for countries like India. A sensitive MIC reported by Vitek two needs to be carefully considered due high propensity for VMEs particularly for Klebsiella spp.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是根据临床和实验室标准研究所(CLSI)和欧洲抗菌药物敏感性测试委员会(EUCAST)标准,使用圆盘扩散和肉汤微量稀释(BMD)方法对鲍曼不动杆菌复合物进行头孢地洛时,评估抑制区与最低抑制浓度(MIC)之间的相关性。从2019年至2021年,从中国抗菌药物监测网的56家医院收集了468株非重复鲍曼不动杆菌复合临床分离株。根据CLSI指南,使用贫铁阳离子调节的Mueller-Hinton肉汤(ID-CAMHB)和标准圆盘扩散方法进行BMD。根据CLSI和EUCAST断点解释结果。分类协议(CA),小错误(mE),主要错误(ME),并计算了磁盘扩散方法的主要误差(VME)。所有鲍曼不动杆菌复合物分离株的BMD敏感性分别为98.7%(CLSI)和97.6%(EUCAST)。对于所有鲍曼不动杆菌复合体分离株,CA分别为98.1%(CLSI)和97.0%(EUCAST),VME的0.9%(CLSI)和1.9%(EUCAST),分别。对于碳青霉烯类敏感的鲍曼不动杆菌复合物,CA是100%,没有使用CLSI和EUCAST断点的mE或VME。对于耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌复合物,CA分别为97.5%(CLSI)和96.2%(EUCAST),1.1%(CLSI)和2.5%(EUCAST)的VME,分别。关于难以治疗的耐药性鲍曼不动杆菌复合体分离株,CA分别为97.6%(CLSI)和95.7%(EUCAST),VME的1.2%(CLSI)和3.1%(EUCAST),分别。在这项研究中,很难评估头孢德罗二醇的圆盘扩散。使用CLSI断点的BMD对头孢地洛有抗性的分离株很少,这些被归类为容易受到磁盘扩散测试的影响。这项研究确实如此,然而,表明鲍曼不动杆菌分离株的主要比例对头孢地洛敏感,包括耐碳青霉烯的鲍曼不动杆菌。重要性耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌因其流行率高和治疗选择有限而成为全球主要健康问题。头孢地洛是唯一一种新型的食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的β-内酰胺药物,用于耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌感染的补救治疗。目前,cefiderocol的商业自动敏感性测试小组不可用。在常规微生物学实验室中,贫铁阳离子调节的Mueller-Hinton肉汤的制备和肉汤微量稀释的性能都很麻烦。圆盘扩散法方便头孢地洛抗菌药敏试验,但针对鲍曼不动杆菌临床分离株的数据有限。此外,临床和实验室标准研究所于2022年发布了对鲍曼不动杆菌头孢多醇圆盘扩散断点的修订。因此,我们评估了头孢地洛圆盘扩散的性能与参考BMD对鲍曼不动杆菌临床分离株的比较,尤其是头孢地洛区直径≤14毫米的那些。
    OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is a major global health concern due to its high prevalence and limited treatment options. Cefiderocol is the only novel Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved β-lactam agent for the salvage treatment of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii infection. Currently, a commercial automated susceptibility testing panel of cefiderocol is unavailable. Both the preparation of iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth and the performance of broth microdilution are cumbersome in routine microbiology laboratories. A disk diffusion method is convenient for cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing, but limited data are available specifically for A. baumannii clinical isolates. Moreover, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute published revisions to the A. baumannii cefiderocol disk diffusion breakpoints in 2022. Hence, we evaluated the performance of cefiderocol disk diffusion compared with the reference BMD against A. baumannii clinical isolates, especially those with cefiderocol zone diameters ≤ 14 mm.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号