Background The escalating global rise in multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria presents an increasingly substantial threat to patient safety. Over the past decade, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) have emerged as one of the most critical pathogens in hospital-acquired infections, notably within intensive care units. Colistin has become one of the last-resort antimicrobial agents utilized to combat infections caused by CRE. However, the use of colistin has been accompanied by a notable increase in the prevalence of colistin-resistant bacteria. This study aimed to investigate plasmid-mediated colistin resistance genes ranging from mcr-1 to mcr-8 among members of the Enterobacterales order. Materials and methods This prospective study was conducted in the microbiology laboratory of Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University Health Research and Practice Center between May 1, 2021 and July 31, 2022. A total of 2,646 Enterobacterales isolates were obtained from all culture-positive clinical samples sent from various clinics. Of these, 79 isolates exhibiting resistance to carbapenem antibiotics were included in the study. Among the 79 isolates, the presence of mcr-1 to mcr-8 genes was investigated in 27 isolates that were shown to be resistant to colistin. The identification of bacteria at the species level and antibiotic susceptibility tests were conducted using the VITEK 2 automated system (bioMérieux, USA). Colistin resistance among Enterobacterales strains exhibiting carbapenem resistance was evaluated using the broth microdilution technique (ComASP™ Colistin, Liofilchem, Italy), in accordance with the manufacturer\'s instructions. Results In our in vitro investigations, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for meropenem were determined to be >8 µg/ml, whereas for colistin, the MIC50 value was >16 µg/ml and the MIC90 value was 8 µg/ml. A total of 27 colistin-resistant strains were identified among the 79 carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales strains analyzed. The most prevalent agent among colistin-resistant strains was Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae), representing 66.7% of the isolates. This was followed by Proteus mirabilis (P. mirabilis) with 29.6% and Escherichia coli (E. coli) with 3.7%. The colistin resistance rate among carbapenem-resistant strains was found to be 34.2%, with colistin MIC values in strains tested by the broth microdilution method ranging from 4 to >16 µg/ml concentrations. In polymerase chain reaction (PCR) studies, the mcr-1 gene region was successfully detected by real-time PCR in the positive control isolate. Nevertheless, none of the gene regions from mcr-1 to mcr-8 were identified in our study investigating the presence of plasmid-mediated genes using a multiplex PCR kit. Conclusion Although our study demonstrated the presence of increased colistin resistance rates in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates, it resulted in the failure to detect genes from mcr-1 to mcr-8 by the multiplex PCR method. Therefore, it is concluded that the colistin resistance observed in Enterobacteriaceae isolates in our region is not due to the mcr genes screened, but to different resistance development mechanisms.

Despite the first-line recommendation of fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), there are pressing barriers for optimizing its use for the treatment of non-Escherichia coli Enterobacterales UTI. There are no approved breakpoints for oral use against other Enterobacterales, and the recommended agar dilution (AD) reference method for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination is largely impractical. Using 160 clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, we sought to understand rates of skipped wells and MIC imprecision in broth microdilution (BMD) and how that compares to rates of error using AD. Though the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute refers to the skipped well phenomena in their recommendation against the use of BMD, there is a paucity of data on its frequency. While AD and BMD produced similar MIC50/90 values (32/256 µg/mL for AD and 64/256 µg/mL for BMD), essential agreement was poor. No-growth wells at concentrations below the MIC occurred in up to 10.9% of wells at a given concentration, as the most frequent scientific error. Growth in concentrations above the measured MIC occurred in up to 3.3% of wells and was seen within three dilutions of the MIC for BMD. Observation of single colonies either at or beyond the measured MIC for AD was also common and occurred up to 8.3% and 2.5% of the time, respectively. The frequent scientific error in both testing methods should prompt re-evaluation of AD guidelines and expansion of MIC testing methods for fosfomycin susceptibility testing, as poor agreement with another method prone to scientific error should not be the main detractor from BMD use.IMPORTANCEDespite the recommendation of fosfomycin for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), there are barriers for optimizing its use. There are no approved breakpoints for oral use against other Enterobacterales, and the recommended agar dilution (AD) reference method for MIC determination is largely impractical. The use of broth microdilution (BMD) for fosfomycin testing is not recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute due to unsatisfactory precision and skipped wells-occurrence of no-growth in a single well before the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)-and trailing endpoints. We sought to understand rates of skipped wells and growth at concentrations above measured MICs in BMD and how that compares to scientific error using AD. No-growth wells at concentrations below the MIC occurred in up to 10.9% of wells for BMD and single colonies at or beyond measured MICs for AD were also common. Frequent scientific error in both methods should prompt re-evaluation of both AD and BMD for fosfomycin susceptibility testing.

OBJECTIVE: Due to the potential for Aspergillus species to cause lethal infections and the rising rates of antifungal resistance, the significance of antifungal susceptibility tests has increased. We aimed to assess the sensitivities of Aspergillus species to amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VOR), itraconazole (ITZ), and caspofungin (CAS) using disk diffusion (DD) and gradient diffusion (GD) methods and compare them with broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference susceptibility method.
METHODS: The study involved 62 Aspergillus fumigatus, 28 Aspergillus flavus, and 16 Aspergillus terreus isolates, totaling 106 Aspergillus isolates. BMD and DD methods were performed in accordance with CLSI M38-A2 and CLSI M51-A documents, respectively. The GD method utilized nonsupplemented Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) as the medium.
RESULTS: In the BMD method, the lowest minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)90 or minimal effective concentration (MEC)90 values were observed for VOR and CAS (0.5 μg/mL and 0.06 μg/mL, respectively). AMB and ITZ MIC90 values were both 2 μg/mL. In our comparison of the GD method with the BMD method at ±2 dilution, we observed essential agreement rates of 91.6%, 99.1%, 100%, and 38.6% for AMB, VOR, ITZ, and CAS, respectively. When comparing DD and BMD methods, we found categorical agreement rates of 65.1%, 99.1%, 77.3%, and 100% for AMB, VOR, ITZ, and CAS, respectively. For GD and BMD methods, these rates were 79.2%, 99.1%, 87.8%, and 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high essential and categorical agreement rates, we posit that the GD method is a viable alternative to the BMD method for AMB, ITZ and VOR but not for CAS. In addition, the use of nonsupplemented MHA in the GD method proves advantageous due to its cost-effectiveness and widespread availability compared to other growth media.

BACKGROUND: Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) facilitates the optimization of antimicrobial therapy, preventing antimicrobial resistance and improving patient outcomes. QMAC-dRAST (QuantaMatrix Inc., Korea) is a rapid AST platform based on microfluidic chip technology that performs AST directly using positive blood culture broth (PBCB). This study evaluated the performance of QMAC-dRAST for Gram-negative bacteria using PBCB and subcultured colony isolates, comparing it with that of VITEK 2 (bioMérieux, France) using broth microdilution (BMD) as the reference method.
METHODS: We included 141 Gram-negative blood culture isolates from patients with BSI and 12 carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales spiked into blood culture bottles. QMAC-dRAST performance was evaluated using PBCB and colony isolates, whereas VITEK 2 and BMD were tested only on colony isolates.
RESULTS: For PBCB, QMAC-dRAST achieved 92.1% categorical agreement (CA), 95.3% essential agreement (EA), with 1.8% very major errors (VMEs), 3.5% major errors (MEs), and 5.2% minor errors (mEs). With colony isolates, it exhibited 92.5% CA and 95.1% EA, with 2.0% VMEs, 3.2% MEs, and 4.8% mEs. VITEK 2 showed 94.1% CA and 96.0% EA, with 4.3% VMEs, 0.4% MEs, and 4.3% mEs. QMAC-dRAST yielded elevated error rates for specific antimicrobial agents, with high VMEs for carbapenems and aminoglycosides. The median time to result for QMAC-dRAST was 5.9 h for PBCB samples and 6.1 h for subcultured colony isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: The QMAC-dRAST system demonstrated considerable strengths and comparable performance to the VITEK 2 system; however, challenges were discerned with specific antimicrobial agents, underlining a necessity for improvement.

There are increasing reports of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) that test as cefepime-susceptible (S) or susceptible-dose dependent (SDD). However, there are no data to compare the cefepime testing performance of BD Phoenix automated susceptibility system (BD Phoenix) and disk diffusion (DD) relative to reference broth microdilution (BMD) against carbapenemase-producing (CPblaKPC-CRE) and non-producing (non-CP CRE) isolates. Cefepime susceptibility results were interpreted according to CLSI M100Ed32. Essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (miEs), major errors (MEs), and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for BD Phoenix (NMIC-306 Gram-negative panel) and DD relative to BMD. Correlates were also analyzed by the error rate-bounded method. EA and CA for CPblaKPC-CRE isolates (n = 64) were <90% with BD Phoenix while among non-CP CRE isolates (n = 58), EA and CA were 96.6%, and 79.3%, respectively. CA was <90% with DD for both cohorts. No ME or VME was observed for either isolate cohort; however, miEs were >10% for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix and DD tests. For error rate-bounded method, miEs were <40% for IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 ranges for CPblaKPC-CRE and non-CP CRE with BD Phoenix. Regarding disk diffusion, miEs were unacceptable for all MIC ranges among CPblaKPC-CRE. For non-CP CRE isolates, only IHigh + 1 to ILow - 1 range was acceptable at 37.2%. Using this challenge set of genotypic-phenotypic discordant CRE, the BD Phoenix MICs and DD susceptibility results trended higher (toward SDD and resistant phenotypes) relative to reference BMD results yielding lower CA. These results were more prominent among CPblaKPC-CRE than non-CP CRE.

BACKGROUND: Colistin is the last resort treatment against resistant Gram-negative bacteria, necessitating reliable and rapid means for sensitivity testing of colistin. Automated systems like VITEK®2 are adopted to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) due to easy usage. Broth microdilution (BMD) for colistin MIC was suggested by EUCAST and CLSI.
OBJECTIVE: To compare and evaluate colistin MIC by BMD and VITEK®2 against Gram-negative organisms from the ICU in a tertiary care hospital.
METHODS: Clinically significant organisms isolated from ICU patients were included. MIC was determined using BMD and VITEK®2. Very major error (VME), major error (ME), essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity were analysed.
RESULTS: 533 isolates were obtained from blood (435,81.60%), respiratory samples (57,10.70%), pus and exudates (20,3.80%), urine (18,3.40%), and CSF (3,0.60%). The Enterobacterales were K. pneumoniae (185,34.70%) E. coli (73,13.70%) and E. cloacae (26,4.90%) while non-fermenters were A. baumannii (209,39.20%) and P. aeruginosa (40,7.50%). The VITEK®2 sensitivity was >99%; specificity ranged from 14.28 to 52.94%. PPV was 93.81% while NPV was 93.75%. VME ranged from 47 to 100% between isolates. ME was up to 20%. The highest VME was obtained in E. coli (100%). The total EA and CA observed were 68.5% and 99.79% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Automated system VITEK®2 failed to detect the resistance in 32 (60%) isolates. The obtained VME and ME values were >3%, which is unacceptable as per the standard guidelines. EA of ≥90% wasn\'t obtained. Sensitivity for VITEK®2 was >99%, but had low specificity (14.28%). Hence, VITEK®2 is not reliable for colistin susceptibility testing.

Introduction. The increasing prevalence and growing resistance of fungi present a significant peril to public health. There are only four classes of antifungal medicines available today, and few candidates are in clinical trials.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Rapid and sensitive diagnostic techniques are lacking for most fungal pathogens, and those that do exist are expensive or hard to obtain.Aim. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a novel automated antifungal susceptibility testing system, Fungus AST, in comparison to the broth microdilution method (BMD) recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).Methodology. A total of 101 clinical Candida spp. isolates were collected from the Zengcheng Branch of Nanfang Hospital and subjected to antifungal susceptibility testing. Antifungal susceptibility was assessed using the Fungus AST method and the BMD.Results. In this study, we introduce a novel automated antifungal susceptibility testing system, Fungus AST, which detects the turbidity and/or colour intensity of microdilution wells using a four-wavelength detection technology in real time and is designed to match the growth characteristics of strains over time. Based on our analysis, all reportable ranges of Fungus AST were suitable for clinical fungal isolates in PR China. Within ±twofold dilutions, reproducibility was 100 %. Considering the BMD as a referenced method, ten antifungal agents (anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, 5-flucytosine and nystatin) showed an essential agreement of >95 %. The category agreement of five antifungal agents (anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole and voriconazole) was excellent at >90 %. One Candida albicans isolate and voriconazole showed a major error (ME) (1.7 %), and no other ME or very ME agents were found.Conclusion. Given the above, it can be argued that the utilization of Fungus AST is a discretionary automated approach. More improvements are needed in Fungus AST compared to the BMD system for a wider range of clinical isolates, including different types of fungi.

This study aimed to develop a method for standardized broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Avibacterium (Av.) paragallinarum, the causative agent of infectious coryza in chickens. For this, a total of 83 Av. paragallinarum isolates and strains were collected from 15 countries. To select unrelated isolates for method validation steps, macrorestriction analyses were performed with 15 Av. paragallinarum. The visible growth of Av. paragallinarum was examined in six broth media and growth curves were compiled. In Veterinary Fastidious Medium and cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) + 1% chicken serum + 0.0025% NADH (CAMHB + CS + NADH), visible growth of all isolates was detected and both media allowed adequate bacterial growth. Due to the better readability of Av. paragallinarum growth in microtiter plates, CAMHB + CS + NADH was chosen for AST. Repetitions of MIC testing with five epidemiologically unrelated isolates using a panel of 24 antimicrobial agents resulted in high essential MIC agreements of 96%-100% after 48-h incubation at 35 ± 2°C. Hence, the remaining 78 Av. paragallinarum were tested and demonstrated easily readable MICs with the proposed method. Differences in MICs were detected between isolates from different continents, with isolates from Africa showing lower MICs compared to isolates from America and Europe, which more often showed elevated MICs of aminoglycosides, quinolones, tetracyclines, and/or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. PCR analyses of isolates used for method development revealed that isolates with elevated MICs of tetracyclines harbored the tetracycline resistance gene tet(B) but none of the other tested resistance genes were detected. Therefore, whole-genome sequencing data from 62 Av. paragallinarum were analyzed and revealed the presence of sequences showing nucleotide sequence identity to the genes aph(6)-Id, aph(3″)-Ib, blaTEM-1B, catA2, sul2, tet(B), tet(H), and mcr-like. Overall, the proposed method using CAMHB + CS + NADH for susceptibility testing with 48-h incubation time at 35 ± 2°C in ambient air was shown to be suitable for Av. paragallinarum. Due to a variety of resistance genes detected, the development of clinical breakpoints is highly recommended.
OBJECTIVE: Avibacterium paragallinarum is an important pathogen in veterinary medicine that causes infectious coryza in chickens. Since antibiotics are often used for treatment and resistance of the pathogen is known, targeted therapy should be given after resistance testing of the pathogen. Unfortunately, there is currently no accepted method in standards that allows susceptibility testing of this fastidious pathogen. Therefore, we have worked out a method that allows harmonized susceptibility testing of the pathogen. The method meets the requirements of the CLSI and could be used by diagnostic laboratories.

Gepotidacin (GSK2140944) is a novel, bactericidal, first in class triazaacenaphthylene bacterial type II topoisomerase inhibitor in development for the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections and gonorrhea. The performance of several antimicrobial susceptibility methods (broth microdilution, gradient diffusion, and disk diffusion) for gepotidacin were evaluated using over 5800 recent Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus saprophyticus clinical isolates. Reference broth microdilution gepotidacin MICs showed an essential agreement of 95.9 % and 98.1 % with MICs by gradient diffusion for E. coli and S. saprophyticus isolates, respectively. Gepotidacin susceptibility using disks produced by 2 manufacturers had good agreement with an R2 values of 0.95 and 99.2 % of overall zone diameters agreeing within 3 mm. A correlation with an overall R2 value of 0.72 between MICs by broth microdilution and zone diameters by disk diffusion was observed. This data should assist in the clinical development of gepotidacin and provide reliable susceptibility methods to evaluate its activity.

Organizations like the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) or the European Committee of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) provide standardized methodologies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of a wide range of nonfastidious and fastidious bacteria, but so far not for Mycoplasma spp. of animal origin. Recently, a proposed method for the standardized broth microdilution testing of Mycoplasma hyorhinis using commercial Sensititre microtiter plates was presented. In this study, we evaluated this broth microdilution method with 37 field isolates and tested their susceptibility toward the following antimicrobial agents: doxycycline, enrofloxacin, erythromycin, florfenicol, gentamicin, marbofloxacin, tetracycline, tiamulin, tilmicosin, tulathromycin, and tylosin. The isolates originated from different countries, isolation sites, and years. The broth microdilution method was carried out using a modified Friis broth as the culture and test medium. For macrolides and lincosamides, a bimodal distribution with elevated MIC values could be observed for almost half of the tested field isolates, deducing reduced susceptibility toward these substances. With a recently published protocol, we were able to test a variety of field isolates, and consistent data could be obtained. Using this method, monitoring studies of Mycoplasma hyorhinis isolates can be carried out in a comparable manner, and the observed susceptibility profiles can be screened for possible changes in MIC values in the future.