Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors

肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缺乏关于二甲双胍和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASis)对钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂(SGLT2i)相关肾脏结局的影响的真实世界证据。本研究旨在调查2型糖尿病患者合并使用二甲双胍或RAS是否改变SGLT2i相关肾脏结局。
    SGLT2i用户在2016年5月和2017年12月期间从三个电子健康记录数据库中被识别,并被分为有和没有同时使用二甲双胍或RASis的用户。进行倾向评分匹配以最小化组间的基线差异。研究结果是平均估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)变化和时间达到30%,40%,和50%的eGFR降低。进行了荟萃分析,以结合数据库中的估计值。
    匹配后,有6,625和3,260名SGLT2i用户有和没有二甲双胍,以及6,654和2,746个SGLT2i用户,分别。有和没有二甲双胍治疗的SGLT2i用户的eGFR下降相似,但与没有RAS的用户相比,使用RAS的SGLT2i用户更大。二甲双胍和RASi的使用对SGLT2i相关的eGFR降低均无显著影响,如使用二甲双胍/RASis的SGLT2is降低30%eGFR的危险比(95%CI)所证明的那样,即1.02(0.87-1.20)/1.09(0.92-1.31)。在eGFR降低40%和50%的结果中也观察到了这些发现。
    使用二甲双胍或RASis并未改变2型糖尿病患者SGLT2i相关肾脏结局。
    UNASSIGNED: There is a lack of real-world evidence regarding the impact of concomitant metformin and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) on sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i)-associated kidney outcomes. This study was aimed to investigate whether SGLT2i-associated kidney outcomes were modified by the concomitant use of metformin or RASis in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    UNASSIGNED: SGLT2i users were identified from three electronic health record databases during May 2016 and December 2017 and categorized into those with and without concomitant use of metformin or RASis. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize baseline differences between groups. Study outcomes were mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change and time to 30%, 40%, and 50% eGFR reductions. A meta-analysis was performed to combine the estimates across databases.
    UNASSIGNED: After matching, there were 6,625 and 3,260 SGLT2i users with and without metformin, and 6,654 and 2,746 SGLT2i users with and without RASis, respectively. The eGFR dip was similar in SGLT2i users with and without metformin therapy, but was greater in SGLT2i users with RASis compared to those without RASis. Neither metformin nor RASi use had a significant effect on SGLT2i-associated eGFR reductions, as evidenced by the hazard ratios (95% CIs) of 30% eGFR reductions for SGLT2is with versus without metformin/RASis, namely 1.02 (0.87-1.20)/1.09 (0.92-1.31). Such findings were also observed in the outcomes of 40% and 50% eGFR reductions.
    UNASSIGNED: Using metformin or RASis did not modify SGLT2i-associated kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:许多指南都推荐肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASI)作为慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的一线治疗方法。我们研究了2010年至2019年RASI处方趋势,并分析了中国住院CKD患者与RASI处方相关的特征。
    目的:研究肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂在中国CKD住院患者中的处方。
    方法:回顾性分析,横断面回顾2010年至2019年中国住院CKD患者的RASI处方。分析了2010年至2019年的RASI处方趋势,并进行了双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与RASI处方相关的特征。
    结果:共纳入35090例CKD患者,10043(28.6%)RASI处方。在这些患者中,18919(53.9%)符合基于2012肾脏疾病:改善全球结果指南的RASI治疗标准。其中,7246例(38.3%)患者接受RASI处方。RASI处方从2011年到2012年显示出最初的快速增长,在2015年和2016年左右达到峰值,然后表现出随后的小幅下降趋势。双变量和多变量分析都表明,包括男性,年龄小于60岁,肾内科入院,CKD阶段较低,高血压或糖尿病史,蛋白尿,肾小球肾炎作为CKD的病因,非急性肾损伤与RASI处方相关。
    结论:近年来,RASI处方的使用频率呈初期增加趋势,但略有下降。CKD患者具有某些特征,如高龄,晚期疾病阶段,外科入院,或急性肾损伤患者接受RASI处方的可能性较小.RASI在住院CKD患者中的应用不足。实际临床实践有待改进。相关研究的开展有助于指导临床治疗策略的正确选择。
    BACKGROUND: Many guidelines have recommended renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) as the first-line treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We studied RASI prescription trends from 2010 to 2019, and analyzed the characteristics associated with RASI prescription in Chinese hospitalized CKD patients.
    OBJECTIVE: To study the prescription of renin angiotensin system inhibitors in hospitalized patients with CKD in China.
    METHODS: It was retrospectively, cross-sectional reviewed RASI prescriptions in hospitalized CKD patients in China from 2010 to 2019. RASI prescribing trends were analyzed from 2010 to 2019, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with RASI prescription.
    RESULTS: A total of 35090 CKD patients were included, with 10043 (28.6%) RASI prescriptions. Among these patients, 18919 (53.9%) met the criteria for RASI treatments based on the 2012 kidney disease: Improving global outcomes guidelines. Of these, 7246 (38.3%) patients received RASI prescriptions. RASI prescriptions showed an initial rapid increase from 2011 to 2012, reached its peak around 2015 and 2016, and then exhibited a subsequent slight decreasing trend. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that several characteristics, including the male gender, age less than 60-year-old, nephrology department admission, lower CKD stage, history of hypertension or diabetes, proteinuria, glomerulonephritis as the CKD etiology, and non-acute kidney injury were associated with RASI prescriptions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of RASI prescriptions showed an initial increase but a slight decreasing trend in more recent years. CKD patients with certain characteristics such as elderly age, advanced disease stage, surgery department admission, or acute kidney injury were less likely to receive RASI prescriptions. In the application of RASI in hospitalized CKD patients is insufficient. The actual clinical practice needs to be improved. The development of related research is helpful to guide the correct choice of clinical treatment strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASI)对接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的高血压癌症患者的预后的影响仍然不明确。本研究旨在阐明在ICIs治疗的背景下使用RASI对该特定患者组的预后的影响。渴望为理性提供更清晰的基础,这些药物的临床处方中的循证选择。
    在PubMed上进行了全面搜索,Embase,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆的原始研究发表到2023年8月6日。包括以英文报道的总生存期(OS)和/或无进展生存期(PFS)的95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(HR)发表的研究。使用R软件(版本4.2.2)执行所有统计分析。
    共13项研究,包括大约12,595名患者,满足纳入标准。荟萃分析表明,RASI的使用与OS中的有利结果之间存在统计学上的显着关联(HR,0.74;95%CI,0.62-0.88)和PFS(HR,0.77;95%CI,0.62-0.96)在接受ICIs治疗的癌症患者中。
    这项研究提供了令人信服的证据,支持RASI对接受ICI的癌症患者的有益预后影响。RASI为接受ICIs治疗的高血压癌症患者提供了一种可行的抗高血压药物选择。通过前瞻性研究进一步探索和验证是必要的,以建立使用RASIs管理接受ICIs免疫治疗的高血压癌症患者的明确指南。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/普华永道/,标识符CRD42023454886。
    UNASSIGNED: The impact of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) on the outcome of hypertensive cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) therapy remains ambiguous. This investigation sought to elucidate the consequences of RASIs use on the prognosis for this specific patient group within the context of ICIs treatment, aspiring to provide a clearer basis for rational, evidence-driven choices in the clinical prescription of these medications.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for original studies published up to 6 August 2023. Studies published in English reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS) were included. All statistical analyses were executed utilizing R software (version 4.2.2).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 13 studies, encompassing approximately 12,595 patients, satisfied the inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses demonstrated a statistically significant association between the use of RASIs and a favorable outcome in OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.88) and PFS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62-0.96) among cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: This investigation provides compelling evidence supporting the beneficial prognostic impact of RASIs on cancer patients receiving ICIs. RASIs present a viable option as antihypertensive agents for cancer patients with hypertension undergoing ICIs treatment. Further exploration and validation through prospective studies are necessary to establish definitive guidelines for the use of RASIs in managing hypertensive cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy with ICIs.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023454886.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于晚期慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者是否应停用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASI)存在争议。最近,据报道,晚期CKD患者停止RASI与死亡率和心血管事件(CV)增加相关;尚不清楚在透析开始前停止RASI是否会影响透析后的临床结局,这项研究旨在评估。在日本的这项多中心前瞻性队列研究中,我们纳入了717名患者(平均年龄,67岁;68%的男性)肾病护理持续时间≥90天,开始血液透析,并在血液透析开始前3个月使用RASI。多变量校正Cox模型用于比较650(91%)在血液透析开始之前持续RASI的患者和67(9.3%)停止RASI的患者之间的死亡率和CV事件风险。在3.5年的中位随访期间,170例(24%)患者死亡,228例(32%)发生CV事件。与连续RASI相比,终止RASI与死亡率无关(校正风险比[aHR]:0.82;95%置信区间[CI]:0.50-1.34),但与较高的CV事件相关(aHR:1.59;95%CI:1.06-2.38).亚组分析显示,在年龄<75岁的患者中,因CV事件停止RASI的风险特别高。停止RASI和年龄之间存在显著的相互作用。这项研究表明,在透析开始前立即停止RASI的患者与随后的较高CV事件有关。主动筛查CV疾病可能对这些患者特别有益。
    It is controversial whether renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) should be stopped in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, it was reported that stopping RASIs in advanced CKD was associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular (CV) events; however, it remains unclear whether stopping RASIs before dialysis initiation affects clinical outcomes after dialysis, which this study aimed to evaluate. In this multicenter prospective cohort study in Japan, we included 717 patients (mean age, 67 years; 68% male) who had a nephrology care duration ≥90 days, initiated hemodialysis, and used RASIs 3 months before hemodialysis initiation. The multivariable adjusted Cox models were used to compare mortality and CV event risk between 650 (91%) patients who continued RASIs until hemodialysis initiation and 67 (9.3%) patients who stopped RASIs. During a median follow-up period of 3.5 years, 170 (24%) patients died and 228 (32%) experienced CV events. Compared with continuing RASIs, stopping RASIs was unassociated with mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.34) but was associated with higher CV events (aHR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.06-2.38). Subgroup analyses showed that the risk of stopping RASIs for CV events was particularly high in patients aged <75 years, with a significant interaction between stopping RASIs and age. This study revealed that patients who stopped RASIs immediately before dialysis initiation were associated with subsequent higher CV events. Active screening for CV disease may be especially beneficial for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:术前血浆N末端B型利钠肽(NT-proBNP>100pgml-1)升高的患者在非心脏手术后会出现更多并发症。使用肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂治疗心脏代谢疾病的个体特别容易发生围手术期心肌损伤和并发症。我们假设在手术前停用RAS抑制剂会增加围手术期心肌损伤的风险,根据血浆NT-proBNP浓度的术前风险分层。
    方法:在对英国六个中心的2a期试验的预先计划分析中,≥60岁的择期非心脏手术患者在手术前被随机分配停止或继续使用RAS抑制剂.单个RAS抑制剂的药代动力学特征确定了手术前停用的时间。主要结果,给调查人员蒙面,临床医生,和病人,是心肌损伤(血浆高敏肌钙蛋白T≥15ngL-1或≥5ngL-1增加,术前高敏肌钙蛋白-T≥15ngL-1),术后48h内。感兴趣的共同暴露为术前血浆NT-proBNP(<或>100μgml-1)和停止或继续RAS抑制剂。
    结果:在241名参与者中,101(41.9%;平均年龄71[7]岁;48%女性)术前NT-proBNP>100pgml-1(中位数339[160-833]pgml-1),其中9/101(8.9%)被正式诊断为心力衰竭。63/101(62.4%)NT-proBNP>100pgml-1的受试者发生心肌损伤,而45/140(32.1%)NT-proBNP<100pgml-1的受试者发生心肌损伤。对于术前NT-proBNP<100pgml-1的受试者,停用RAS抑制剂的30/75(40%)有心肌损伤,与继续使用RAS抑制剂的15/65(23.1%)相比(停用OR为2.22[95%CI1.06-4.65];P=0.03)。对于术前NT-proBNP>100pgml-1,无论停止(62.2%)还是继续(62.5%)RAS抑制剂(或停止0.98[95%CI0.44-2.22]),心肌损伤率相似。
    结论:在低风险患者中停用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(术前NT-proBNP<100pgml-1)会增加非心脏手术前心肌损伤的可能性。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with elevated preoperative plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP >100 pg ml-1) experience more complications after noncardiac surgery. Individuals prescribed renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors for cardiometabolic disease are at particular risk of perioperative myocardial injury and complications. We hypothesised that stopping RAS inhibitors before surgery increases the risk of perioperative myocardial injury, depending on preoperative risk stratified by plasma NT-proBNP concentrations.
    METHODS: In a preplanned analysis of a phase 2a trial in six UK centres, patients ≥60 yr old undergoing elective noncardiac surgery were randomly assigned either to stop or continue RAS inhibitors before surgery. The pharmacokinetic profile of individual RAS inhibitors determined for how long they were stopped before surgery. The primary outcome, masked to investigators, clinicians, and patients, was myocardial injury (plasma high-sensitivity troponin-T ≥15 ng L-1 or a ≥5 ng L-1 increase, when preoperative high-sensitivity troponin-T ≥15 ng L-1) within 48 h after surgery. The co-exposures of interest were preoperative plasma NT-proBNP (< or >100 pg ml -1) and stopping or continuing RAS inhibitors.
    RESULTS: Of 241 participants, 101 (41.9%; mean age 71 [7] yr; 48% females) had preoperative NT-proBNP >100 pg ml -1 (median 339 [160-833] pg ml-1), of whom 9/101 (8.9%) had a formal diagnosis of cardiac failure. Myocardial injury occurred in 63/101 (62.4%) subjects with NT-proBNP >100 pg ml-1, compared with 45/140 (32.1%) subjects with NT-proBNP <100 pg ml -1 {odds ratio (OR) 3.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.05-5.99); P<0.0001}. For subjects with preoperative NT-proBNP <100 pg ml-1, 30/75 (40%) who stopped RAS inhibitors had myocardial injury, compared with 15/65 (23.1%) who continued RAS inhibitors (OR for stopping 2.22 [95% CI 1.06-4.65]; P=0.03). For preoperative NT-proBNP >100 pg ml-1, myocardial injury rates were similar regardless of stopping (62.2%) or continuing (62.5%) RAS inhibitors (OR for stopping 0.98 [95% CI 0.44-2.22]).
    CONCLUSIONS: Stopping renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in lower-risk patients (preoperative NT-proBNP <100 pg ml -1) increased the likelihood of myocardial injury before noncardiac surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)在老年高血压和有骨折风险的患者中的治疗效果一直备受关注,因为越来越多的证据表明骨组织中的局部RAS激活导致破骨细胞吸收,导致骨质疏松症。本研究旨在调查大型队列中RASi使用与骨折发生率之间的关联。
    方法:我们采用嵌套病例对照设计来研究RASi使用与新出现的骨折之间的关联。病例定义为2004年1月至2015年12月期间新诊断为骨折的患者。我们使用1:1倾向评分匹配选择了1,049例病例和对照。进行条件logistic回归分析以估计RASi暴露与骨折发生率之间的关联。
    结果:总体而言,RASi的使用与较低的骨折发生率显着相关(曾经使用过的人与从未使用过的人:OR,0.73;95%CI,0.59-0.91)。我们发现,仅使用ARB的用户比从未使用RASi的用户经历更少的骨折(或,0.65;95%CI,0.49-0.86),而仅ACEi的用户或ARB/ACEi曾经的用户则没有。在亚组分析中,RASi-曾经没有脑血管疾病的使用者,BMI超过23且他汀类药物暴露者的OR显著较低.
    结论:本研究建立了使用RASi和减少骨折发生率之间的显著关联,因此突出了RASi作为有骨质疏松性骨折风险的老年患者的预防策略的潜在临床实用性。
    BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in elderly patients with hypertension and at risk of fractures has been in the limelight because of accumulating evidence that localized RAS activation in bone tissue leads to osteoclastic bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis. This study set out to investigate the association between RASi use and fracture incidence in a large cohort.
    METHODS: We employed a nested case-control design to investigate the association between RASi use and newly developed fractures. A case was defined as a patient newly diagnosed with a fracture between January 2004 and December 2015. We selected 1,049 cases and controls using 1:1 propensity score matching. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association between RASi exposure and fracture incidence.
    RESULTS: Overall, RASi usage was significantly associated with lower odds for fracture incidence (ever-users vs never-users: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91). We found that ARB-only users experienced fewer fractures than RASi-never users (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), whereas ACEi-only users or ARB/ACEi-ever users did not. In subgroup analysis, RASi-ever users without cerebrovascular disease, those with a BMI exceeding 23, and statin exposure had significantly lower ORs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study established a significant association between RASi use and reduced fracture incidence, thus highlighting the potential clinical utility of RASi use as a preventive strategy in elderly patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    放射性肺炎(RP)是与放射疗法相关的主要剂量限制性毒性。本研究旨在观察肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂在接受胸部放疗的中国肺癌患者中的作用。
    在2017年10月至2022年12月期间接受总剂量≥45Gray的胸部放疗的肺癌患者被纳入本研究。我们回顾性评估了影响2级或更高RP的因素。
    本研究共纳入320例患者;62例患者被确定为血管紧张素受体阻滞剂或血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂使用者。此外,99例患者(30.9%)有2级或更高的RP,肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂组的发病率为17.7%(62例患者中有11例)。肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)组的患者年龄较大,男性比例较高,ECOG评分0百分比较低,高血压百分比较高,腺癌的百分比高于非RASi组。ECOG评分[危险比(HR)=1.69,p=0.009],吸烟史(HR=1.76,p=0.049),平均剂量(HR=3.63,p=0.01),RASi(HR=0.3,p=0.003)是RP的独立预测因素。所有亚组均受益于RASi。
    这项研究表明,口服RASi有可能减轻接受胸部放疗的肺癌患者的2级或更高RP的发生率。为了验证和进一步证实这些发现,有必要进行额外的前瞻性研究.
    UNASSIGNED: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is the primary dose-limiting toxicity associated with radiotherapy. This study aimed to observe the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in Chinese patients with lung cancer who received thoracic radiation.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with lung cancer who received thoracic radiation at a total dose of ≥45 Gray between October 2017 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the factors influencing grade 2 or higher RP.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 320 patients were enrolled in this study; 62 patients were identified as angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor users. Additionally, 99 patients (30.9%) had grade 2 or higher RP, and the incidence in the renin-angiotensin system inhibitor group was 17.7% (11 out of 62 patients). Patients in the renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) group were older and had a higher percentage of males, lower percentage of ECOG score 0, higher percentage of hypertension, and higher percentage of adenocarcinoma than those in the non-RASi group. ECOG score [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.69, p = 0.009], history of smoking (HR = 1.76, p = 0.049), mean dose (HR = 3.63, p = 0.01), and RASi (HR = 0.3, p = 0.003) were independent predictive factors for RP. All subgroups benefited from RASi.
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed that oral RASi administration has the potential to mitigate the incidence of grade 2 or higher RP in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracic radiotherapy. To validate and further substantiate these findings, additional prospective research is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇叙述性综述旨在评估病理生理学,诊断,和难治性高血压(RH)的终末期肾病(ESKD)患者的透析治疗,特别关注肾脏去神经(RDN)对短期和长期血压(BP)控制的影响。此外,我们分享我们在接受RH血液透析的淀粉样变性患者中使用RDN的经验.
    结果:高BP,一个重要的可改变的心血管危险因素,经常在ESKD患者中观察到,尽管服用了多种抗高血压药物。然而,在临床实践中,由于在这种情况下缺乏对RH的具体定义,因此鉴定接受透析治疗的RH患者仍然具有挑战性.此外,使用侵入性方法,如RDN,在临床试验中排除肾功能降低(eGFR<45mL/min/1.73m3)的患者,限制了RH的治疗.然而,最近的研究报告了关于RDN在3期和4期慢性肾脏病(CKD)和ESKD透析患者中的有效性的令人鼓舞的结果,血压降低近10mmhg。尽管多种潜在的病理生理机制有助于RH,在ESKD透析患者的交感神经系统过度激活中起着至关重要的作用。RH的诊断需要通过动态BP监测或家庭BP监测来确认对抗高血压治疗的依从性以及不受控制的BP值的存在。治疗涉及非药物方法的组合(如干重减少,限钠,透析液钠浓度降低,和运动)和药物治疗。一种有前途的RH管理方法是基于基于导管的RDN,通过射频,超声,或酒精输液,直接针对交感神经过度活动。
    This narrative review aims to assess the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of resistant hypertension (RH) in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis, with a specific focus on the effect of renal denervation (RDN) on short-term and long-term blood pressure (BP) control. Additionally, we share our experience with the use of RDN in an amyloidotic patient undergoing hemodialysis with RH.
    High BP, an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor, is often observed in patients in ESKD, despite the administration of multiple antihypertensive medications. However, in clinical practice, it remains challenging to identify RH patients on dialysis treatment because of the absence of specific definition for RH in this context. Moreover, the use of invasive approaches, such as RDN, to treat RH is limited by the exclusion of patients with reduced renal function (eGFR < 45 mL/min/1.73 m3) in the clinical trials. Nevertheless, recent studies have reported encouraging results regarding the effectiveness of RDN in stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESKD patients on dialysis, with reductions in BP of nearly up to 10 mmhg. Although multiple underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to RH, the overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system in ESKD patients on dialysis plays a crucial role. The diagnosis of RH requires both confirmation of adherence to antihypertensive therapy and the presence of uncontrolled BP values by ambulatory BP monitoring or home BP monitoring. Treatment involves a combination of nonpharmacological approaches (such as dry weight reduction, sodium restriction, dialysate sodium concentration reduction, and exercise) and pharmacological treatments. A promising approach for managing of RH is based on catheter-based RDN, through radiofrequency, ultrasound, or alcohol infusion, directly targeting on sympathetic overactivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名33岁妇女出现高血压急症(268/168mmHg),伴有肾衰竭和高血压视网膜病变。开始持续输注尼卡地平的抗高血压治疗后四小时,她的血压(BP)降至168/84mmHg;然而,病人出现了失明。她被诊断为后部缺血性视神经病变(PION)。她的血压维持在约175/90mmHg直到她的视力改善。在第13天开始服用奥美沙坦,她的血压降至约135/95mmHg,但视力丧失没有再加重。虽然PION的预后较差,其早期诊断和逐步降压治疗可能有助于保护患者的视力。
    A 33-year-old woman developed hypertensive emergency (268/168 mmHg) with renal failure and hypertensive retinopathy. Four hours after the initiation of antihypertensive therapy with the continuous infusion of nicardipine, her blood pressure (BP) decreased to 168/84 mmHg; however, the patient developed blindness. She was diagnosed with posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION). Her BP was maintained at approximately 175/90 mmHg until her vision improved. Olmesartan was initiated on day 13, and her BP decreased to approximately 135/95 mmHg without the re-exacerbation of vision loss. Although the prognosis of PION is poor, its early diagnosis and gradual antihypertensive therapy may help preserve the patient\'s vision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂的停药在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中很常见,一些研究已经报道了潜在的危险。然而,尚未进行全面分析。
    目的:本研究旨在评估停用RAS抑制剂对CKD的影响。
    方法:截至2022年11月30日的相关研究已在PubMed中确定,Embase,WebofScience,和Cochrane图书馆数据库。疗效结果包括全因死亡率,心血管事件,和终末期肾病(ESKD)。使用随机效应或固定效应模型组合结果,敏感性分析采用留一法。
    结果:六项观察性研究和一项随机临床试验,包括244,979名患者,符合纳入标准。汇总数据表明,停用RAS抑制剂与全因死亡率风险增加相关(HR1.42,95%CI1.23-1.63)。心血管事件风险(HR1.25,95%CI1.17-1.22),和ESKD(HR1.23,95%CI1.02-1.49)。在敏感性分析中,ESKD的风险降低.亚组分析显示,eGFR高于30mL/min/m2的患者和高钾血症相关停药的患者死亡风险更为明显。相比之下,eGFR低于30mL/min/m2的患者有很高的心血管事件风险.
    结论:CKD患者停用RAS抑制剂与全因死亡和心血管事件的风险显著增加相关。这些数据表明,如果临床情况允许,应在CKD中继续使用RAS抑制剂。
    Discontinuation of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and the potential danger has been reported in several studies. However, a comprehensive analysis has not been conducted.
    This study sought to evaluate the effects of discontinuation of RAS inhibitors in CKD.
    Relevant studies up to November 30, 2022, were identified in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Efficacy outcomes included the composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Results were combined using a random-effects or fixed-effects model, and sensitivity analysis used the leave-one-out method.
    Six observational studies and one randomized clinical trial including 244,979 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled data demonstrated that discontinuation of RAS inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.23-1.63), cardiovascular event risk (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.17-1.22), and ESKD (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.49). In sensitivity analyses, the risk for ESKD was reduced. Subgroup analysis showed that the risk of mortality was more pronounced in patients with eGFR above 30 mL/min/m2 and in patients with hyperkalemia-related discontinuation. In contrast, patients with eGFR below 30 mL/min/m2 were at great risk of cardiovascular events.
    The discontinuation of RAS inhibitors in patients with CKD was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. These data suggest that RAS inhibitors should be continued in CKD if the clinical situation allows.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号