背景:许多指南都推荐肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASI)作为慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的一线治疗方法。我们研究了2010年至2019年RASI处方趋势,并分析了中国住院CKD患者与RASI处方相关的特征。
目的:研究肾素血管紧张素系统抑制剂在中国CKD住院患者中的处方。
方法:回顾性分析,横断面回顾2010年至2019年中国住院CKD患者的RASI处方。分析了2010年至2019年的RASI处方趋势,并进行了双变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与RASI处方相关的特征。
结果:共纳入35090例CKD患者,10043(28.6%)RASI处方。在这些患者中,18919(53.9%)符合基于2012肾脏疾病:改善全球结果指南的RASI治疗标准。其中,7246例(38.3%)患者接受RASI处方。RASI处方从2011年到2012年显示出最初的快速增长,在2015年和2016年左右达到峰值,然后表现出随后的小幅下降趋势。双变量和多变量分析都表明,包括男性,年龄小于60岁,肾内科入院,CKD阶段较低,高血压或糖尿病史,蛋白尿,肾小球肾炎作为CKD的病因,非急性肾损伤与RASI处方相关。
结论:近年来,RASI处方的使用频率呈初期增加趋势,但略有下降。CKD患者具有某些特征,如高龄,晚期疾病阶段,外科入院,或急性肾损伤患者接受RASI处方的可能性较小.RASI在住院CKD患者中的应用不足。实际临床实践有待改进。相关研究的开展有助于指导临床治疗策略的正确选择。
BACKGROUND: Many guidelines have recommended renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) as the first-line treatment for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We studied RASI prescription trends from 2010 to 2019, and analyzed the characteristics associated with RASI prescription in Chinese hospitalized CKD patients.
OBJECTIVE: To study the prescription of renin angiotensin system inhibitors in hospitalized patients with CKD in
China.
METHODS: It was retrospectively, cross-sectional reviewed RASI prescriptions in hospitalized CKD patients in
China from 2010 to 2019. RASI prescribing trends were analyzed from 2010 to 2019, and bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify characteristics associated with RASI prescription.
RESULTS: A total of 35090 CKD patients were included, with 10043 (28.6%) RASI prescriptions. Among these patients, 18919 (53.9%) met the criteria for RASI treatments based on the 2012 kidney disease: Improving global outcomes guidelines. Of these, 7246 (38.3%) patients received RASI prescriptions. RASI prescriptions showed an initial rapid increase from 2011 to 2012, reached its peak around 2015 and 2016, and then exhibited a subsequent slight decreasing trend. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that several characteristics, including the male gender, age less than 60-year-old, nephrology department admission, lower CKD stage, history of hypertension or diabetes, proteinuria, glomerulonephritis as the CKD etiology, and non-acute kidney injury were associated with RASI prescriptions.
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of RASI prescriptions showed an initial increase but a slight decreasing trend in more recent years. CKD patients with certain characteristics such as elderly age, advanced disease stage, surgery department admission, or acute kidney injury were less likely to receive RASI prescriptions. In the application of RASI in hospitalized CKD patients is insufficient. The actual clinical practice needs to be improved. The development of related research is helpful to guide the correct choice of clinical treatment strategy.