Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors

肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂(RASi)在老年高血压和有骨折风险的患者中的治疗效果一直备受关注,因为越来越多的证据表明骨组织中的局部RAS激活导致破骨细胞吸收,导致骨质疏松症。本研究旨在调查大型队列中RASi使用与骨折发生率之间的关联。
    方法:我们采用嵌套病例对照设计来研究RASi使用与新出现的骨折之间的关联。病例定义为2004年1月至2015年12月期间新诊断为骨折的患者。我们使用1:1倾向评分匹配选择了1,049例病例和对照。进行条件logistic回归分析以估计RASi暴露与骨折发生率之间的关联。
    结果:总体而言,RASi的使用与较低的骨折发生率显着相关(曾经使用过的人与从未使用过的人:OR,0.73;95%CI,0.59-0.91)。我们发现,仅使用ARB的用户比从未使用RASi的用户经历更少的骨折(或,0.65;95%CI,0.49-0.86),而仅ACEi的用户或ARB/ACEi曾经的用户则没有。在亚组分析中,RASi-曾经没有脑血管疾病的使用者,BMI超过23且他汀类药物暴露者的OR显著较低.
    结论:本研究建立了使用RASi和减少骨折发生率之间的显著关联,因此突出了RASi作为有骨质疏松性骨折风险的老年患者的预防策略的潜在临床实用性。
    BACKGROUND: The therapeutic efficacy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in elderly patients with hypertension and at risk of fractures has been in the limelight because of accumulating evidence that localized RAS activation in bone tissue leads to osteoclastic bone resorption, resulting in osteoporosis. This study set out to investigate the association between RASi use and fracture incidence in a large cohort.
    METHODS: We employed a nested case-control design to investigate the association between RASi use and newly developed fractures. A case was defined as a patient newly diagnosed with a fracture between January 2004 and December 2015. We selected 1,049 cases and controls using 1:1 propensity score matching. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the association between RASi exposure and fracture incidence.
    RESULTS: Overall, RASi usage was significantly associated with lower odds for fracture incidence (ever-users vs never-users: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91). We found that ARB-only users experienced fewer fractures than RASi-never users (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86), whereas ACEi-only users or ARB/ACEi-ever users did not. In subgroup analysis, RASi-ever users without cerebrovascular disease, those with a BMI exceeding 23, and statin exposure had significantly lower ORs.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study established a significant association between RASi use and reduced fracture incidence, thus highlighting the potential clinical utility of RASi use as a preventive strategy in elderly patients at risk for osteoporotic fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名33岁妇女出现高血压急症(268/168mmHg),伴有肾衰竭和高血压视网膜病变。开始持续输注尼卡地平的抗高血压治疗后四小时,她的血压(BP)降至168/84mmHg;然而,病人出现了失明。她被诊断为后部缺血性视神经病变(PION)。她的血压维持在约175/90mmHg直到她的视力改善。在第13天开始服用奥美沙坦,她的血压降至约135/95mmHg,但视力丧失没有再加重。虽然PION的预后较差,其早期诊断和逐步降压治疗可能有助于保护患者的视力。
    A 33-year-old woman developed hypertensive emergency (268/168 mmHg) with renal failure and hypertensive retinopathy. Four hours after the initiation of antihypertensive therapy with the continuous infusion of nicardipine, her blood pressure (BP) decreased to 168/84 mmHg; however, the patient developed blindness. She was diagnosed with posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION). Her BP was maintained at approximately 175/90 mmHg until her vision improved. Olmesartan was initiated on day 13, and her BP decreased to approximately 135/95 mmHg without the re-exacerbation of vision loss. Although the prognosis of PION is poor, its early diagnosis and gradual antihypertensive therapy may help preserve the patient\'s vision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: To date, there has been a renewed interest in renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) for HCC prevention because they may reduce potent angiogenic factors.
    OBJECTIVE: This study set out to investigate associations between RASi use and HCC development.
    METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study. A case was defined as a patient who was newly diagnosed with HCC. We selected 567 cases and controls using 1:1 propensity score matching. RASi exposure was classified into ever-user and never-user, then categorized according to cumulative dose and prescription period. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for HCC incidence according to RASi use were analyzed.
    RESULTS: Overall, no significant association was found between exposure to RASi and HCC incidence (ever-user vs. never-user: aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.07). In subgroup analysis, women receiving RASi ≥30 cumulative defined daily doses (cDDDs) showed significantly lower aORs (0.49; 95% CI, 0.24-0.95. Angiotensin II receptor blockers only-use ≥30 cDDD was significantly associated with reduced risk of HCC (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.97). In cases where subjects did not have diabetes mellitus and where the cDDD of RASi was 1800 or more, the risk of HCC development was significantly reduced compared to that in subjects with no RASi exposure (aOR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.72).
    CONCLUSIONS: The present study did not verify a significant overall association between RASi use and HCC but indicated lower HCC incidence in some subgroups. The possibility of a beneficial effect at a higher cumulative RASi dose was also presented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号