Mobility limitation

移动性限制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在分析中国老年人对家庭和社区综合医疗保健和日常护理服务(简称“家庭和社区护理服务”)的需求和利用情况,并调查服务利用的不公平。
    方法:横断面数据来自2018年中国健康与退休纵向研究。分析了60岁及以上老年人家庭和社区护理服务的需求和利用率。进行了二元逻辑回归分析,以探讨与行动受限的老年人服务利用相关的因素。浓度指数,水平不公平指数,使用泰尔指数分析服务利用的不公平。进行了不公平指数的分解分析,以解释不同因素对观察到的不公平的贡献。
    结果:2018年中国约有32.6%的60岁及以上老年人行动不便,但其中只有18.5%的人使用了家庭和社区护理服务。在单一服务利用率中,使用率最高(15.5%)来自定期体检。流动性有限,年龄组,收入水平,区域,自我评估健康,和抑郁是与使用任何一种类型的服务相关的统计学显著因素。任何一种类型的服务利用和定期体检利用的集中度指数均高于0.1,收入对不平等的贡献均超过60%。区域内因素导致使用任何一种类型的服务约90%的不平等,定期体检和现场访问。
    结论:目前的研究表明,有家庭和社区护理服务需求的老年人未充分利用这些服务。确定了服务利用中的富人不平等现象,收入是不平等的最大来源。各省之间家庭和社区护理服务利用的差异很大,但各地区之间的差异很小。需要制定政策,优化与家庭和社区护理服务相关的资源分配,以更好地满足行动不便的老年人的需求,特别是在低收入群体和中部地区。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the needs and utilization of the home and community integrated healthcare and daily care services (\"home and community care services\" for short) among older adults in China and to investigate the inequity in services utilization.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional data were obtained from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Needs and utilization rates of the home and community care services in older adults of 60 years old and above were analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with services utilization among older adults with limited mobility. Concentration index, horizontal inequity index, and Theil index were used to analyze inequity in services utilization. Decomposition analyses of inequity indices were conducted to explain the contribution of different factors to the observed inequity.
    RESULTS: About 32.6% of older adults aged 60 years old and above had limited mobility in China in 2018, but only 18.5% of them used the home and community care services. Among the single service utilization, the highest using rate (15.5%) was from regular physical examination. Limited mobility, age group, income level, region, self-assessed health, and depression were statistically significant factors associated with utilization of any one type of the services. Concentration indices of any one type service utilization and regular physical examination utilization were both above 0.1, and the contribution of income to inequity were both over 60%. Intraregional factor contributed to about 90% inequity of utilizing any one type service, regular physical examination and onsite visit.
    CONCLUSIONS: This current study showed that older adults with needs of home and community care services underused the services. Pro-rich inequities in services utilization were identified and income was the largest source of inequity. The difference of the home and community care service utilization was great among provinces but minor across regions. Policies to optimize resources allocation related to the home and community care services are needed to better satisfy the needs of older adults with limited mobility, especially in the low-income group and the central region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们估计了教育研讨会和10周户外步行组(OWG)与研讨会和10周每周提醒(WR)对增加户外步行(主要结果)和步行能力的短期影响,促进健康的行为,和成功的衰老定义为参与有意义的活动和老年人户外行走困难的幸福感(次要结果)。
    方法:在4个站点中,平行组随机对照试验,两组报告户外行走困难的社区生活老年人(≥65岁)参加.在为期1天的研讨会之后,参与者被分层并随机分配到为期10周的公园OWG或10电话WR强化研讨会内容.掩蔽评价发生在0、3和5.5个月。我们使用带有对数链接函数的零膨胀负二项回归对室外步行分钟数进行建模(从加速度计和全球定位系统数据得出),对缺失的观察进行估算。我们对步行能力的非估算复合测量进行了建模,促进健康的行为,并使用具有基于正态分布和非结构化相关矩阵的一般估计方程的广义线性模型成功老化。对网站的分析进行了调整,独自或与合作伙伴一起参与,和队列。
    结果:我们将190人随机分为OWG(n=98)和WR干预(n=92)。在0、3和5.5个月时,OWG的室外步行分钟中位数为22.56、13.04和0,WR组的24.00、26.07和0,分别。根据3个月(IRR=0.74,95%CI0.47,1.14)和5.5个月(IRR=0.77,95%CI0.44,1.34)的发生率比(IRR)和95%置信区间(CI),两组之间的户外步行分钟基线变化无差异。与WR组相比,OWG观察到步行能力的0至3个月变化更大(βz评分差异=0.14,95%CI0.02,0.26),这是由于步行自我效能感的显着改善所致;其他比较没有统计学意义。
    结论:A组,基于公园的OWG在增加户外步行活动方面并不优于WR,在户外行走困难的老年人中促进健康的行为或成功衰老;然而,OWG在通过提高步行自我效能来提高步行能力方面优于电话WR。讨论了OWG的社区实施。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03292510注册日期:2017年9月25日。
    BACKGROUND: We estimated the short-term effects of an educational workshop and 10-week outdoor walk group (OWG) compared to the workshop and 10 weekly reminders (WR) on increasing outdoor walking (primary outcome) and walking capacity, health-promoting behavior, and successful aging defined by engagement in meaningful activities and well-being (secondary outcomes) in older adults with difficulty walking outdoors.
    METHODS: In a 4-site, parallel-group randomized controlled trial, two cohorts of community-living older adults (≥ 65 years) reporting difficulty walking outdoors participated. Following a 1-day workshop, participants were stratified and randomized to a 10-week OWG in parks or 10 telephone WR reinforcing workshop content. Masked evaluations occurred at 0, 3, and 5.5 months. We modeled minutes walked outdoors (derived from accelerometry and global positioning system data) using zero-inflated negative binomial regression with log link function, imputing for missing observations. We modeled non-imputed composite measures of walking capacity, health-promoting behavior, and successful aging using generalized linear models with general estimating equations based on a normal distribution and an unstructured correlation matrix. Analyses were adjusted for site, participation on own or with a partner, and cohort.
    RESULTS: We randomized 190 people to the OWG (n = 98) and WR interventions (n = 92). At 0, 3, and 5.5 months, median outdoor walking minutes was 22.56, 13.04, and 0 in the OWG, and 24.00, 26.07, and 0 in the WR group, respectively. There was no difference between groups in change from baseline in minutes walked outdoors based on incidence rate ratio (IRR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) at 3 months (IRR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.47, 1.14) and 5.5 months (IRR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.44, 1.34). Greater 0 to 3-month change in walking capacity was observed in the OWG compared to the WR group (βz-scored difference = 0.14, 95% CI 0.02, 0.26) driven by significant improvement in walking self-efficacy; other comparisons were not significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: A group, park-based OWG was not superior to WR in increasing outdoor walking activity, health-promoting behavior or successful aging in older adults with difficulty walking outdoors; however, the OWG was superior to telephone WR in improving walking capacity through an increase in walking self-efficacy. Community implementation of the OWG is discussed.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03292510 Date of registration: September 25, 2017.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很少有经过验证的上下文度量来预测采用基于证据的程序。临床地点的背景变化会阻碍传播。我们检查了实施STRIDE的退伍军人事务医院的组织特征,医院步行计划,和特征对程序采用的影响。使用并行混合方法设计,我们通过计划采用来描述背景和组织特征。组织特征包括:组织弹性,实施气候,组织准备实施变革,与其他网站相比,复杂性最高的网站,材料支撑,调整后的住院时间(LOS)高于全国中位数和低于全国中位数,和改进经验。我们在医院启动时收集了入学表格,并对4家医院的工作人员进行了定性访谈,这些医院符合最初的采用基准,定义为在低接触实施支持下启动后的5至6个月内与5名独特的住院退伍军人一起完成监督步行。我们发现,31%(35家医院中有11家)的医院达到了采用基准。7%的最高复杂性医院采用,而48%的复杂性较低。接受资源的比例为43%,没有资源的比例为29%。LOS高于中位数的医院中有36%采用,而低于中位数的医院为23%。35%至少有一些实施经验,而0%则很少甚至没有经验。采用者报告的组织弹性高于非采用者(平均值=23.5[SD=2.6]vs22.7[SD=2.6])。与未采用的医院相比,采用的医院报告了更大的组织变更准备(平均值=4.2[SD=0.5]vs3.8[SD=0.6])。定性,所有网站都报告说,工作人员致力于实施STRIDE。与会者报告了采用的其他障碍,包括人员配备方面的挑战以及与雇用人员相关的延误。采用者报告说,有足够的工作人员促进了实施。在这项研究中,实施气候与满足STRIDE计划采用基准没有关联。可能易于评估的上下文因素,例如资源可用性,如果没有密集的实施支持,可能会影响新计划的采用。
    There are few validated contextual measures predicting adoption of evidence-based programs. Variation in context at clinical sites can hamper dissemination. We examined organizational characteristics of Veterans Affairs hospitals implementing STRIDE, a hospital walking program, and characteristics\' influences on program adoption. Using a parallel mixed-method design, we describe context and organizational characteristics by program adoption. Organizational characteristics included: organizational resilience, implementation climate, organizational readiness to implement change, highest complexity sites versus others, material support, adjusted length of stay (LOS) above versus below national median, and improvement experience. We collected intake forms at hospital launch and qualitative interviews with staff members at 4 hospitals that met the initial adoption benchmark, defined as completing supervised walks with 5+ unique hospitalized Veterans during months 5 to 6 after launch with low touch implementation support. We identified that 31% (n = 11 of 35) of hospitals met adoption benchmarks. Seven percent of highest complexity hospitals adopted compared to 48% with lower complexity. Forty-three percent that received resources adopted compared to 29% without resources. Thirty-six percent of hospitals with above-median LOS adopted compared to 23% with below-median. Thirty-five percent with at least some implementation experience adopted compared to 0% with very little to no experience. Adopters reported higher organizational resilience than non-adopters (mean = 23.5 [SD = 2.6] vs 22.7 [SD = 2.6]). Adopting hospitals reported greater organizational readiness to change than those that did not (mean = 4.2 [SD = 0.5] vs 3.8 [SD = 0.6]). Qualitatively, all sites reported that staff were committed to implementing STRIDE. Participants reported additional barriers to adoption including challenges with staffing and delays associated with hiring staff. Adopters reported that having adequate staff facilitated implementation. Implementation climate did not have an association with meeting STRIDE program adoption benchmarks in this study. Contextual factors which may be simple to assess, such as resource availability, may influence adoption of new programs without intensive implementation support.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内,人口正在迅速老龄化,由于最近死亡率的下降,和预期寿命的增加。到2020年,全球约有7.27亿人年龄≥65岁,到2050年,六分之一的人将≥65岁。2010年,加纳约有7%的人口超过60岁,预计到2050年将达到12%。然而,老年人面临着退化的状况,这些状况转化为行动困难。进行这项研究是为了调查加纳老年人的行动困难。
    方法:该研究利用了2014/2015(第2波)全球老龄化和成人健康研究的横截面数据集,包括1,856名年龄≥50岁的参与者。应用调查命令来调整采样偏差和研究设计。在5%的α水平,采用卡方检验独立性,以确定因变量和自变量之间的关联.在95%的置信区间和5%的α水平下,采用三级多水平logistic回归模型.固定效应以比值比表示,随机效应使用类内相关性表示。所有分析均使用STATA统计软件16.0版进行。
    结果:在1,856名参与者中,40.3%的人行动不便。此外,年龄(80岁及以上)[AOR=3.05,95CI=1.78-5.22],自我报告的不良/不良健康状况[AOR=2.39,95CI=1.35-4.23],执行家庭活动有严重/极端困难[AOR=25.12,95CI=11.49-44.91],经历了严重/极端的身体疼痛[AOR=4.56,95CI=2.16-9.64],严重/极端睡眠问题[AOR=4.15,95CI=1.68-10.29],视力/视力困难[AOR=1.56,95CI=1.16-2.10]的参与者行动不便的几率更高.
    结论:加纳老年人的行动困难患病率相对较高(40.3%),受人口统计学影响,健康状况,和衰老相关的退化。这凸显了加纳为老年人提供社会支持和加强社会资本的必要性,尤其是那些视力有困难的人,经历身体疼痛,健康状况不佳。此外,政府和利益攸关方应提供老年人辅助设备和老年护理,包括娱乐场和护理院,以满足加纳老年人的健康和身体需求。
    BACKGROUND: Globally, the population is rapidly ageing, stemming from a recent decline in mortality, and an increase in life expectancy. About 727 million people globally were aged ≥65 in 2020, and 1 in 6 people will be ≥65 years by 2050. About 7% of Ghana\'s population was over 60 years in 2010, and projected to be 12% by 2050. However, the aged are confronted with degenerative conditions that translate into difficulty with mobility. The study was conducted to investigate the difficulty with mobility among the aged in Ghana.
    METHODS: The study utilised a cross-sectional dataset of the 2014/2015 (wave 2) Study on Global Ageing and Adult Health and included 1,856 participants aged ≥50 years. The survey command was applied to adjust for sampling biases and the design of the study. At 5% alpha level, a chi-square test of independence was conducted to determine the association between dependent and independent variables. At 95% confidence interval and 5% alpha level, three-level multilevel logistic regression models were performed. The fixed-effects were presented in odds ratio and the random effects were presented using the Intra-Class Correlation. All analysis were performed using STATA statistical software version 16.0.
    RESULTS: Out of the 1,856 participants, 40.3% had difficulty with mobility. Additionally, age (80 and above) [AOR = 3.05, 95%CI = 1.78-5.22], self-reported poor/bad health status [AOR = 2.39, 95%CI = 1.35-4.23], having severe/extreme difficulty performing household activities [AOR = 25.12, 95%CI = 11.49-44.91], experienced severe/extreme bodily pains [AOR = 4.56, 95%CI = 2.16-9.64], severe/extreme sleep problems [AOR = 4.15, 95%CI = 1.68-10.29], and participants with difficulty with sight/vision [AOR = 1.56, 95%CI = 1.16-2.10] had higher odds of difficulty with mobility.
    CONCLUSIONS: The aged in Ghana had relatively higher prevalence (40.3%) of difficulty with mobility which is influenced by demographics, health status, and degeneration associated with ageing. This highlights the need to provide social support and strengthen social capital for the aged in Ghana, especially those with difficulty with vision, experiencing bodily pains and had poor health status. Additionally, the Government and stakeholders should provide assistive devices for the aged and geriatric care including recreational fields and care homes to address the health and physical needs of the aged in Ghana.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:运动疗法是治疗结核(TB)相关周围神经病变(PN)的多学科方法中的关键组成部分。个性化运动方案最大化治疗益处,同时最小化症状恶化的风险。这项研究旨在确定多组分运动计划对肺结核幸存者抗结核药物治疗诱导的PN中疼痛和功能活动性的影响。
    方法:在批准的实验研究中,110名抗结核研究药物诱导的PN参与者被随机分配到两组,并使用IBMSPSSStatisticsforWindows分析数据,版本26(2019年发布;IBMCorp.,Armonk,纽约,美国)。该研究的目的是评估多组分运动计划对PN症状的疗效。
    结果:该研究评估了多组分运动方案在结核病相关PN患者中的有效性。实验组显示出显著的疼痛减轻(p<0.0001),改善神经症状(p<0.0001),12分钟步行试验(p<0.0001)和静坐试验(p<0.0001)的功能结果更好。相反,对照组的改善不明显.低p值表示干预的有效性,强调其对减轻疼痛的影响,神经症状,和功能能力比较实验组和对照组。
    结论:该研究表明,8周多成分运动计划对肺结核相关的PN患者具有显著的有效性。与对照组的常规单组分方案相比,显示出疼痛减轻和功能活动性的显着改善。
    OBJECTIVE:  Exercise therapy is a pivotal component in the multidisciplinary approach to managing tuberculosis (TB)-related peripheral neuropathy (PN). A personalized exercise protocol maximizes therapeutic benefits while minimizing the risk of symptom exacerbation. This study aimed to determine the effect of multicomponent exercise programs on pain and functional mobility in antitubercular drug therapy-induced PN in pulmonary TB survivors.
    METHODS: In the approved experimental study, 110 participants with antitubercular study drug-induced PN were randomly assigned to two groups, and data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). The study\'s purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of a multicomponent exercise program on PN symptoms.
    RESULTS: The study assessed a multicomponent exercise regimen\'s effectiveness in individuals with TB-related PN. The experiment group demonstrated noteworthy pain reduction (p < 0.0001), improvement in neurological symptoms (p < 0.0001), and better functional outcomes in the 12-minute walk test (p < 0.0001) and sit-and-reach test (p < 0.0001). Conversely, the control group exhibited less significant improvements. The low p-values indicate the intervention\'s effectiveness, emphasizing its impact on pain reduction, neurological symptoms, and functional abilities in comparing the experimental and control groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated the significant effectiveness of an eight-week multicomponent exercise program in individuals with pulmonary TB-related PN, showcasing notable improvements in pain reduction and functional mobility compared to a conventional single-component regimen in the control group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:综合评估针对晚期癌症患者行动的非药物干预措施的证据,考虑到类型,可能影响结果的疗效和环境因素。
    方法:对成人(≥18岁)晚期(III-IV期)癌症非药物干预研究的系统评价,并使用临床或患者报告的结果指标评估移动性。在三个电子数据库(MEDLINE,EMBASE和CINAHL)截至2024年6月。使用JoannaBriggs研究所工具评估方法质量,并通过复杂干预框架的背景和实施评估环境因素。由于纳入研究的临床异质性,进行了叙述性综合。
    结果:纳入了包括2,464名参与者的38项研究。最常见的移动性结果测量是6分钟步行测试(26/38研究)。运动是最常见的干预措施,(33项研究:27项有氧和抗性,5有氧,在21/33个结果中发现了1个阻力与有氧训练)和活动能力的改善。在3/5的研究中,电疗干预导致了移动性的显着改善。地理因素(如距离、运输,停车要求)可能限制参与18/38研究。人群中缺乏种族多样性是显而易见的,语言能力是12项研究的纳入标准。
    结论:运动和神经肌肉电刺激似乎可以改善晚期癌症的运动结果。针对流动性的其他非药物干预措施的评估应考虑获取和包容性,并适应这些人口的需求。
    OBJECTIVE: To synthesise evidence evaluating non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility among people with advanced cancer, considering the type, efficacy and contextual factors that may influence outcome.
    METHODS: Systematic review of studies of non-pharmacological interventions in adults (≥ 18 years) with advanced (stage III-IV) cancer, and assessing mobility using clinical or patient-reported outcome measures. Searches were conducted across three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) up to June 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools and contextual factors were evaluated through the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to clinical heterogeneity of included studies.
    RESULTS: 38 studies encompassing 2,464 participants were included. The most frequent mobility outcome measure was the 6-min walk test (26/38 studies). Exercise was the most common intervention, (33 studies: 27 aerobic and resistance, 5 aerobic, 1 resistance versus aerobic training) and improvements in mobility were found in 21/33 outcomes. Electrotherapy interventions led to significant improvements in mobility in 3/5 studies. Geographical factors (e.g. distance, transport, parking requirements) potentially limited participation in 18/38 studies. A lack of ethnic diversity among populations was evident and language proficiency was an inclusion criterion in 12 studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation appear to improve mobility outcomes in advanced cancer. The evaluation of other non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility should consider access and inclusivity, and be adaptable to the needs of this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与年轻人相比,老年人的急诊科(ED)入院率更高。机动性是四处走动的能力,但也包括环境和适应它的能力。助行器可用于提高机动性和防止跌倒。根据国际准则,它们必须在老年ED中可用。这项研究旨在评估训练计划和提供助行器(WA)的有效性,与远程监护相关或不相关,害怕跌倒,移动性,在ED中接受护理的老年人的生活质量和下降3个月和6个月的风险。将在ED中进行随机对照试验。参与者将被随机分为三组,如下:A)助行器小组将接受使用助行器的培训,并接受安全步态的指导;B)助行器和远程监护小组将接受使用助行器的培训,关于安全步态的指导,和远程监护(前三个月每两周一次);C)对照组将仅接受安全步态指导。患者将接受包括社会人口统计学和临床数据的基线评估,在生活空间中的流动性,步态速度,肌肉力量,功能,生活质量,害怕跌倒,瀑布的历史,干预前的认知和情绪。在ED干预后,将再次评估步态时间和对跌倒的恐惧。最后,在生活空间中的流动性,功能,生活质量,害怕跌倒,瀑布的历史,认知,和情绪将在老年ED出院后3个月和6个月通过电话访谈进行评估。目前建议在老年ED中提供助行器。这项研究将是第一个随机对照试验,将评估培训和提供这些设备在ED中的影响。试验注册号:NCT05950269。
    Older adults have higher rates of emergency department (ED) admissions when compared to their younger counterparts. Mobility is the ability to move around, but also encompasses the environment and the ability to adapt to it. Walking aids can be used to improve mobility and prevent falls. According to international guidelines, they must be available in Geriatric EDs. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a program of training and provision of walking aids (WA), associated or not with telemonitoring, on fear of falling, mobility, quality of life and risk of falls up to 3 and 6 months in older adults cared for in an ED. A randomized controlled trial will be carried out in the ED. Participants will be randomized and allocated into three groups, as follows: A) walking aid group will be trained for the use of a walking aid and receive guidance on safe gait; B) walking aid and telemonitoring group will receive training for the use of a walking aid, guidance on safe gait, and telemonitoring (every two weeks for first three months); C) Control group will receive only guidance on safe gait. Patients will undergo a baseline evaluation encompassing sociodemographic and clinical data, mobility in life spaces, gait speed, muscle strength, functionality, quality of life, fear of falling, history of falls, cognition and mood before the intervention. Gait time and fear of falling will be assessed again after the intervention in ED. Finally, mobility in life spaces, functionality, quality of life, fear of falling, history of falls, cognition, and mood will be assessed 3 and 6 months after discharge from the geriatric ED through a telephone interview. Provision of walking aids in the geriatric ED is currently recommended. This study will be the first randomized controlled trial that will evaluate the impact of training and provision of these devices in the ED. Trial registration number: NCT05950269.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移动性限制(例如,使用轮椅)与老年人的功能独立性和生活质量下降密切相关。流动性的调节与多种神经生理和社会人口统计学因素有关。我们在此旨在描述这些因素与老年人活动受限风险的关系。
    方法:在这项纵向研究中,668名基线时活动完整的老年人完成了临床特征的基线评估,认知功能,睡眠质量,日常生活活动(ADL),行走性能,血压逐级跳动,和大脑的结构核磁共振成像。然后,其中506人(平均年龄=70.7±7.5岁)对行动不便的后续访谈做出了回应(定义为使用轮椅,甘蔗,或者步行者,或残疾并躺在床上)后18±3.5个月。进行Logistic回归分析以检查基线特征与随访活动限制之间的关系。
    结果:在基线时,与完整移动性组(n=475)相比,行动不便组(n=31)年龄较大,ADL和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)得分较低,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)得分更高,心血管和脑血管功能较差,步行速度较慢(ps<0.05)。Logistic回归分析表明,有跌倒史的参与者,不受控制的高血压,和/或更大的Fazekas量表(优势比(ORs):1.3〜13.9,95%置信区间(CI)=1.1〜328.2),走得慢,和/或基线时ADL评分较低(ORs:0.0026~0.9;95CI:0.0001~0.99),活动受限的风险显著增加(p<0.05;VIFs=1.2~1.9)。
    结论:这些发现提供了潜在风险因素的新概况,包括血管特征,心理认知和运动表现,为了在不久的将来发展老年人的行动不便,最终帮助设计适当的临床和康复计划,以应对该人群的流动性。
    BACKGROUND: Mobility limitations (e.g., using wheelchair) have been closely linked to diminished functional independence and quality of life in older adults. The regulation of mobility is pertaining to multiple neurophysiologic and sociodemographic factors. We here aimed to characterize the relationships of these factors to the risk of restricted mobility in older adults.
    METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 668 older adults with intact mobility at baseline completed the baseline assessments of clinical characteristics, cognitive function, sleep quality, activities of daily living (ADL), walking performance, beat-to-beat blood pressure, and structural MRI of the brain. Then 506 of them (mean age = 70.7 ± 7.5 years) responded to the follow-up interview on the mobility limitation (as defined by if using wheelchair, cane, or walkers, or being disabled and lying on the bed) after 18 ± 3.5 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the relationships between the baseline characteristics and the follow-up mobility restriction.
    RESULTS: At baseline, compared to intact-mobility group (n = 475), restricted-mobility group (n = 31) were older, with lower score of ADL and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), greater score of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), poorer cardio- and cerebral vascular function, and slower walking speeds (ps < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that participants who were with history of falls, uncontrolled-hypertension, and/or greater Fazekas scale (odds ratios (ORs):1.3 ~ 13.9, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.1 ~ 328.2), walked slower, and/or with lower ADL score (ORs: 0.0026 ~ 0.9; 95%CI: 0.0001 ~ 0.99) at baseline, would have significantly greater risk of restricted mobility (p < 0.05; VIFs = 1.2 ~ 1.9).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide novel profile of potential risk factors, including vascular characteristics, psycho-cognitive and motor performance, for the development of restricted mobility in near future in older adults, ultimately helping the design of appropriate clinical and rehabilitative programs for mobility in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究探讨了COVID-19公共卫生任务对美国行动不便者日常生活的影响。它强调了残疾与健康的社会决定因素的交叉,强调需要采取全面的政策应对措施。
    定性数据是通过对行动不便者进行的76次半结构化访谈收集的。访谈侧重于COVID-19任务授权和社区访问的经验,使用主题分析进行分析,并对紧急次主题进行编码。
    社区参与与COVID-19依从性之间的关系对于残疾人来说很复杂。难以接近的环境和不灵活的政策使残疾人难以实施良好的安全措施,虽然社区成员普遍不遵守限制了他们的社区参与。调查结果显示,COVID-19社区参与政策的其他混合生活经验,可访问性,获得资源和支持。虽然技术促进了社区参与的某些方面,可访问性问题,公共交通,个人援助服务加剧。
    COVID-19政策对行动不便的人有复杂的影响。调查结果表明,有必要制定包容性的政策,提高残疾意识,并继续支持可获得的技术和服务。未来的研究应该进一步探索这些动态,为政策和实践提供信息。
    UNASSIGNED: This study explores the influence of COVID-19 public health mandates on people with mobility disabilities in the United States in their everyday lives. It highlights the intersection of disability with social determinants of health, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive policy response.
    UNASSIGNED: Qualitative data were collected through 76 semi-structured interviews with people with mobility disabilities. Interviews focused on experiences with COVID-19 mandates and community access, analyzed using thematic analysis and coded for emergent subthemes.
    UNASSIGNED: The relationship between community participation and COVID-19 compliance was complex for people with disabilities. Inaccessible environments and inflexible policies made it difficult for people with disabilities to practice good safety measures, while widespread noncompliance by community members limited their community participation. The findings revealed additional mixed lived experiences of COVID-19 policies on community participation, accessibility, and access to resources and support. While technology facilitated some aspects of community participation, issues with accessibility, public transportation, and personal assistance services were exacerbated.
    UNASSIGNED: COVID-19 policies have complex implications for people with mobility disabilities. Findings suggest a need for inclusive policymaking, improved disability awareness, and continued support for accessible technology and services. Future research should further explore these dynamics to inform policy and practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Mobility is crucial for independent living in old age. Older people with reduced physical ability (frailty) begin to limit their personal range of activities to their immediate living environment and ultimately to their immediate home. Diseases of the musculoskeletal system as well as neurological, psychological, cognitive, sensory, and circulatory disorders can limit functional competence (ability to live independently).In the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS), from which selected results are reported in this article, participants were categorized into different functional classes (Robust, postRobust, preFrail, Frail) using the LUCAS functional index. The results show that losses in functional competence were associated with impaired mobility and reduced car driving. Impaired mobility led to restricted radius of action.The aim of healthcare in old age is to preserve independence and quality of life as long as possible. Car driving is an important part of older peoples\' activities of daily living. Therefore, primary care physicians should address car driving regularly because preventive measures to strengthen functional health also strengthen car driving ability in older persons.
    UNASSIGNED: Mobilität ist auch im höheren Alter maßgeblich für die selbstständige Lebensführung. Ältere Menschen beginnen bei geringerer körperlicher Leistungsfähigkeit (Gebrechlichkeit, engl. Frailty) ihren persönlichen Aktionsradius auf das nähere Wohnumfeld und schließlich die unmittelbare Häuslichkeit zu begrenzen. Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparates, neurologische, psychische, kognitive, Sinnes- oder Kreislaufstörungen können die funktionale Kompetenz (Fähigkeit, unabhängig zu leben) einschränken.In einer Längsschnittstudie zur Alterung urbaner Kohorten (LUCAS), aus der in diesem Artikel ausgewählte Ergebnisse berichtet werden, wurden die Teilnehmenden mittels des LUCAS-Funktions-Index unterschiedlichen Funktionsklassen zugeordnet (Robust, postRobust, preFrail und Frail). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass zunehmende Verluste funktionaler Kompetenz mit abnehmender Mobilität und weniger häufigem selbstständigen Autofahren verknüpft waren. Beeinträchtigungen der Mobilität engten den Aktionsradius ein.Das Ziel der gesundheitlichen Versorgung im Alter ist es, Unabhängigkeit und Lebensqualität der Menschen lange zu erhalten. Autofahren ist ein wichtiger Teil der Alltagsaktivitäten älterer Menschen. Deshalb sollte insbesondere hausärztlich auch regelmäßig wiederholt die Frage nach dem Autofahren gestellt werden, denn präventive Maßnahmen zum Erhalt funktionaler Gesundheit dienen auch dem Erhalt der Fahreignung älterer Menschen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号