%0 Systematic Review
%T Non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility among people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.
%A Petrasso C
%A Bayly J
%A Arculeo S
%A Bowers M
%A Costi S
%A Nottelmann L
%A Turola E
%A Vanzulli E
%A Maddocks M
%J Support Care Cancer
%V 32
%N 9
%D 2024 Aug 5
%M 39102127
%F 3.359
%R 10.1007/s00520-024-08767-x
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>To synthesise evidence evaluating non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility among people with advanced cancer, considering the type, efficacy and contextual factors that may influence outcome.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Systematic review of studies of non-pharmacological interventions in adults (≥ 18 years) with advanced (stage III-IV) cancer, and assessing mobility using clinical or patient-reported outcome measures. Searches were conducted across three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) up to June 2024. Methodological quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools and contextual factors were evaluated through the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions framework. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to clinical heterogeneity of included studies.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>38 studies encompassing 2,464 participants were included. The most frequent mobility outcome measure was the 6-min walk test (26/38 studies). Exercise was the most common intervention, (33 studies: 27 aerobic and resistance, 5 aerobic, 1 resistance versus aerobic training) and improvements in mobility were found in 21/33 outcomes. Electrotherapy interventions led to significant improvements in mobility in 3/5 studies. Geographical factors (e.g. distance, transport, parking requirements) potentially limited participation in 18/38 studies. A lack of ethnic diversity among populations was evident and language proficiency was an inclusion criterion in 12 studies.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation appear to improve mobility outcomes in advanced cancer. The evaluation of other non-pharmacological interventions targeting mobility should consider access and inclusivity, and be adaptable to the needs of this population.