Mobility limitation

移动性限制
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在分析中国老年人对家庭和社区综合医疗保健和日常护理服务(简称“家庭和社区护理服务”)的需求和利用情况,并调查服务利用的不公平。
    方法:横断面数据来自2018年中国健康与退休纵向研究。分析了60岁及以上老年人家庭和社区护理服务的需求和利用率。进行了二元逻辑回归分析,以探讨与行动受限的老年人服务利用相关的因素。浓度指数,水平不公平指数,使用泰尔指数分析服务利用的不公平。进行了不公平指数的分解分析,以解释不同因素对观察到的不公平的贡献。
    结果:2018年中国约有32.6%的60岁及以上老年人行动不便,但其中只有18.5%的人使用了家庭和社区护理服务。在单一服务利用率中,使用率最高(15.5%)来自定期体检。流动性有限,年龄组,收入水平,区域,自我评估健康,和抑郁是与使用任何一种类型的服务相关的统计学显著因素。任何一种类型的服务利用和定期体检利用的集中度指数均高于0.1,收入对不平等的贡献均超过60%。区域内因素导致使用任何一种类型的服务约90%的不平等,定期体检和现场访问。
    结论:目前的研究表明,有家庭和社区护理服务需求的老年人未充分利用这些服务。确定了服务利用中的富人不平等现象,收入是不平等的最大来源。各省之间家庭和社区护理服务利用的差异很大,但各地区之间的差异很小。需要制定政策,优化与家庭和社区护理服务相关的资源分配,以更好地满足行动不便的老年人的需求,特别是在低收入群体和中部地区。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the needs and utilization of the home and community integrated healthcare and daily care services (\"home and community care services\" for short) among older adults in China and to investigate the inequity in services utilization.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional data were obtained from the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Needs and utilization rates of the home and community care services in older adults of 60 years old and above were analyzed. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the factors associated with services utilization among older adults with limited mobility. Concentration index, horizontal inequity index, and Theil index were used to analyze inequity in services utilization. Decomposition analyses of inequity indices were conducted to explain the contribution of different factors to the observed inequity.
    RESULTS: About 32.6% of older adults aged 60 years old and above had limited mobility in China in 2018, but only 18.5% of them used the home and community care services. Among the single service utilization, the highest using rate (15.5%) was from regular physical examination. Limited mobility, age group, income level, region, self-assessed health, and depression were statistically significant factors associated with utilization of any one type of the services. Concentration indices of any one type service utilization and regular physical examination utilization were both above 0.1, and the contribution of income to inequity were both over 60%. Intraregional factor contributed to about 90% inequity of utilizing any one type service, regular physical examination and onsite visit.
    CONCLUSIONS: This current study showed that older adults with needs of home and community care services underused the services. Pro-rich inequities in services utilization were identified and income was the largest source of inequity. The difference of the home and community care service utilization was great among provinces but minor across regions. Policies to optimize resources allocation related to the home and community care services are needed to better satisfy the needs of older adults with limited mobility, especially in the low-income group and the central region.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移动性限制(例如,使用轮椅)与老年人的功能独立性和生活质量下降密切相关。流动性的调节与多种神经生理和社会人口统计学因素有关。我们在此旨在描述这些因素与老年人活动受限风险的关系。
    方法:在这项纵向研究中,668名基线时活动完整的老年人完成了临床特征的基线评估,认知功能,睡眠质量,日常生活活动(ADL),行走性能,血压逐级跳动,和大脑的结构核磁共振成像。然后,其中506人(平均年龄=70.7±7.5岁)对行动不便的后续访谈做出了回应(定义为使用轮椅,甘蔗,或者步行者,或残疾并躺在床上)后18±3.5个月。进行Logistic回归分析以检查基线特征与随访活动限制之间的关系。
    结果:在基线时,与完整移动性组(n=475)相比,行动不便组(n=31)年龄较大,ADL和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)得分较低,匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)得分更高,心血管和脑血管功能较差,步行速度较慢(ps<0.05)。Logistic回归分析表明,有跌倒史的参与者,不受控制的高血压,和/或更大的Fazekas量表(优势比(ORs):1.3〜13.9,95%置信区间(CI)=1.1〜328.2),走得慢,和/或基线时ADL评分较低(ORs:0.0026~0.9;95CI:0.0001~0.99),活动受限的风险显著增加(p<0.05;VIFs=1.2~1.9)。
    结论:这些发现提供了潜在风险因素的新概况,包括血管特征,心理认知和运动表现,为了在不久的将来发展老年人的行动不便,最终帮助设计适当的临床和康复计划,以应对该人群的流动性。
    BACKGROUND: Mobility limitations (e.g., using wheelchair) have been closely linked to diminished functional independence and quality of life in older adults. The regulation of mobility is pertaining to multiple neurophysiologic and sociodemographic factors. We here aimed to characterize the relationships of these factors to the risk of restricted mobility in older adults.
    METHODS: In this longitudinal study, 668 older adults with intact mobility at baseline completed the baseline assessments of clinical characteristics, cognitive function, sleep quality, activities of daily living (ADL), walking performance, beat-to-beat blood pressure, and structural MRI of the brain. Then 506 of them (mean age = 70.7 ± 7.5 years) responded to the follow-up interview on the mobility limitation (as defined by if using wheelchair, cane, or walkers, or being disabled and lying on the bed) after 18 ± 3.5 months. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the relationships between the baseline characteristics and the follow-up mobility restriction.
    RESULTS: At baseline, compared to intact-mobility group (n = 475), restricted-mobility group (n = 31) were older, with lower score of ADL and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), greater score of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), poorer cardio- and cerebral vascular function, and slower walking speeds (ps < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis demonstrated that participants who were with history of falls, uncontrolled-hypertension, and/or greater Fazekas scale (odds ratios (ORs):1.3 ~ 13.9, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.1 ~ 328.2), walked slower, and/or with lower ADL score (ORs: 0.0026 ~ 0.9; 95%CI: 0.0001 ~ 0.99) at baseline, would have significantly greater risk of restricted mobility (p < 0.05; VIFs = 1.2 ~ 1.9).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide novel profile of potential risk factors, including vascular characteristics, psycho-cognitive and motor performance, for the development of restricted mobility in near future in older adults, ultimately helping the design of appropriate clinical and rehabilitative programs for mobility in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在:1)探索城市社区中步行速度慢(SSWS)的老年人的行动体验;和2)调查他们的环境障碍和支持。
    对居住在重庆市市区的36个SSWS进行了访谈,中国。通过制图分析和专题分析揭示了影响其流动性的流动模式和建筑环境因素。
    SSWS主要将活动集中在其房屋半径400米的范围内。建筑环境主题包括地形,邻里服务,人行道,座位,交通安全,天气,绿化,和照明。重要的行动障碍包括长楼梯,陡坡,人行道上快速移动的物体,十字路口,和快速的交通。可用的扶手,附近的餐饮服务场所,充足的座位,绿化被确定为其流动性的支持因素。
    这项研究是第一个专门检查SSWS在建筑环境中的移动性的研究。我们建议在为通用设计框架建立基准时应考虑SSWS。这些改进不仅有助于慢步行者的流动性,而且对更广泛的人口产生积极影响。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to: 1) Explore the mobility experiences of seniors with slow walking speeds (SSWS) in urban neighborhoods; and 2) Investigate their environmental barriers and supports.
    UNASSIGNED: Go-along interviews were conducted with 36 SSWS residing in urban neighborhoods of Chongqing City, China. The mobility patterns and built environment factors influencing their mobility were revealed through cartographic analysis and thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: SSWS primarily focused their activities within a 400-meter radius of their homes. Built environment themes included topography, neighborhood services, sidewalks, seating, traffic safety, weather, greenery, and lighting. Significant mobility barriers included long stairs, steep slopes, fast-moving objects on sidewalks, road crossings, and fast traffic. Available handrails, nearby food-service places, ample seating, and greenery were identified as supportive factors for their mobility.
    UNASSIGNED: This study stands out as the first to specifically examine the mobility of SSWS within the built environment. We suggest that SSWS should be taken into account when establishing a benchmark for general design frameworks. These improvements not only contribute to the mobility of slow walkers but also have positive impacts on the broader population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探讨感觉和行动脆弱对整体和特定领域认知功能的不同影响。Further,其他复杂容量(IC)维度之间的独立关联,包括活力和心理维度,并对整体认知功能和特定领域认知功能进行了研究。共有429名参与者(平均年龄,72.91±7.014岁;57.30%女性)接受了IC容量评估。其他协变量,例如人口统计,还评估了健康相关变量.总体或特定领域的认知障碍被用作逻辑回归分析的因变量,健康相关,和心理社会混杂因素。在人口统计调整后,健康相关,和心理社会混杂因素,有感觉虚弱的个体(比值比[OR]=0.435;95%置信区间[CI]=0.236-0.801;P=.008)的轻度认知障碍(MCI)风险显著较低,轻度延迟记忆障碍(OR=0.601,95%CI=0.347-1.040;P=0.069),和语言障碍(OR=0.534,95%CI=0.305-0.936;OR=0.318,P=.029;OR=0.318,95%CI=0.173-0.586;P<.001)通过波士顿命名和动物流利度测试,而不是同时具有感觉和活动能力虚弱或仅有活动能力虚弱的人。抑郁症状对执行功能有显著的负面影响。心血管疾病和非皮肤恶性肿瘤是MCI的独立决定因素,糖尿病与处理速度独立相关,注意,和执行功能。感觉和行动能力虚弱是认知功能障碍的独立危险因素。与感觉虚弱相比,流动性虚弱对整体认知功能,记忆和语言功能的负面影响更大。IC和慢性病心理维度的储备下降也对整体和特定领域的认知功能产生了显着不利影响。
    This study aimed to investigate the different impacts of sensorial and mobility frailty on overall and domain-specific cognitive function. Further, the independent associations between other intricate capacity (IC) dimensions, including vitality and psychological dimensions, and overall and domain-specific cognitive function were investigated. A total of 429 participants (mean age, 72.91 ± 7.014 years; 57.30% female) underwent IC capacity assessment. Other covariates, such as demographics, health-related variables were also assessed. Overall or domain-specific cognitive impairment was used as a dependent variable in logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic, health-related, and psychosocial confounders. After adjustment for demographic, health-related, and psychosocial confounders, individuals with sensorial frailty (odds ratio [OR] = 0.435; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.236-0.801; P = .008) had a significantly lower risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), marginally low delayed memory impairment (OR = 0.601, 95% CI = 0.347-1.040; P = .069), and language impairment (OR = 0.534, 95% CI = 0.305-0.936; OR = 0.318, P = .029; OR = 0.318,95% CI = 0.173-0.586; P < .001) by Boston naming and animal fluency tests than did those with both sensorial and mobility frailty or mobility frailty only. Depressive symptoms had a significant negative influence on executive function. Cardiovascular disease and non-skin malignancy were independent determinants of MCI, and diabetes mellitus was independently associated with processing speed, attention, and executive function. Sensorial and mobility frailty were independent risk factors for cognitive impairment. Mobility frailty had a greater negative influence on the overall cognitive function and memory and language function than did sensorial frailty. The reserve decline in the psychological dimension of IC and chronic diseases also had a significant adverse influence on overall and domain-specific cognition function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查移动设备的使用情况,是否存在年龄和性别相关的使用差异,以及跌倒是否可以进一步解释需要设备的中国老年人随着时间的推移的使用差异。
    方法:纳入需要移动设备并完成2011-2018年中国健康与退休调查四波的社区居住老年人(N=1,302)。创建了一个分类变量来代表受访者年龄(50-64岁、65-74岁和≥75岁)和性别(男性与women).
    结果:器械使用的基线患病率为18.2%(n=237)。总的来说,设备的使用随着时间的推移而增加。交叉性方面,随着时间的推移,年龄最大的女性使用设备的可能性是年龄最小的男性的1.53倍。随着时间的推移,跌倒的受访者更有可能使用设备。
    结论:患有行动不便的老年人,尤其是年龄最大的妇女和跌倒的妇女,移动设备利用率滞后,建议未来量身定制的干预措施来支持这些人群。
    To investigate the utilization of mobility device, whether age and gender-related use disparities exist, and whether falls can further explain use disparities over time among Chinese older adults in need of devices.
    Community-dwelling older adults who needed mobility devices and completed four waves of the China Health and Retirement Survey 2011-2018 were included (N = 1,302). A categorical variable was created to represent respondents\' intersectionality of age (50-64, 65-74, and ≥75 years) and gender (men vs. women).
    The baseline prevalence of device use was 18.2 % (n = 237). Overall, the device use increased over time. Intersectionality-wise, oldest-old women were 1.53 times more likely than youngest-old men to use devices over time. Respondents with falls were more likely to use devices over time.
    Older adults with mobility impairment, especially the oldest-old women and those with falls, lag in mobility devices utilization, suggesting future tailored interventions to support these populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:向后走是日常生活活动不可或缺的组成部分。向后行走测试已用于评估平衡,移动性,不同人群的跌倒风险。本系统综述旨在识别和综合平衡和行动缺陷人群的向后步行测试的测量特性。
    方法:三个书目数据库,PubMed,Embase,还有Scopus,6月18日被搜查,2023年。评估测量特性的横截面或队列研究(可靠性,有效性,包括向后步行测试的反应能力)。COSMIN偏倚风险检查表用于方法学质量评估。研究选择,数据提取,质量评估由两名审核员独立完成,一式两份。
    结果:从三个数据库中确定了总共786条记录。从2019年到2023年发表的14项研究包括853名参与者。两项研究在质量评估中被评为不足,所有其他研究都证明了足够的质量。参与者包括脑瘫患者,中风,多发性硬化症,帕金森病,纤维肌痛,髋关节和膝关节置换术,痴呆症,和社区居住的老年人。良好的评估者和内部可靠性,并证明了向后步行测试的中等到良好的并发有效性。
    结论:该综述表明,在不同的患者人群中,向后步行测试似乎是一种有效和可靠的工具。3米向后步行时间和3米向后步行速度可用作临床实践中的结果指标,以评估平衡和活动能力,并在整个身体康复过程中跟踪进展。需要进行前瞻性队列设计的未来研究,以提供有关向后步行测试对跌倒风险评估的预测有效性的信息。
    Backward walking is an indispensable component of activities of daily living. The backward walk test has been used to assess balance, mobility, and fall risk in different populations. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize measurement properties of the backward walk test in people with balance and mobility deficits.
    Three bibliographic databases, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus, were searched on June 18th, 2023. Cross-sectional or cohort studies assessing the measurement properties (reliability, validity, responsiveness) of the backward walk test were included. The COSMIN risk of bias checklist was used for methodological quality assessment. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were completed by two reviewers independently and in duplicate.
    A total of 786 records were identified from three databases. Fourteen studies published from 2019 to 2023 with a total of 853 participants were included. Two studies were rated inadequate in quality assessment, all other studies demonstrated adequate to very good quality. The participants population included patients with cerebral palsy, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson\'s disease, fibromyalgia, hip and knee arthroplasty, dementia, and community-dwelling older adults. Good interrater and intrarater reliability, and moderate to good concurrent validity of the backward walk test were demonstrated.
    The review demonstrates that the backward walk test appears to be a valid and reliable tool in different patient populations. The 3-meter backward walk time and 3-meter backward walk speed can be used as outcome measures in clinical practice to assess balance and mobility and track progress throughout the course of physical rehabilitation. Future studies with a prospective cohort design are required to provide information regarding the predictive validity of the backward walk test for fall risk assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究平行形式的可靠性,最小可检测变化(MDC95),四个远程康复版本的移动性相关功能量表的可行性:Fugl-Meyer评估-下肢分量表(Tele-FMA-LE),Berg平衡量表(Tele-BBS),以Tinetti绩效为导向的机动性评估-步态子量表(Tele-POMA-G),和Rivermead流动性指数(Tele-RMI)。
    方法:可靠性和一致性研究以及横断面研究。
    方法:医疗中心。
    方法:中风幸存者可以使用辅助设备独立行走3米,参与者及其伴侣年龄≥18岁,稳定的身体状况,和没有认知障碍。
    方法:不适用。
    方法:并行形式Tele-FMA-LE的可靠性和MDC95,Tele-BBS,Tele-POMA-G,和Tele-RMI.
    结果:在远程康复版本和面对面版本的移动性相关功能量表的平均得分之间没有观察到显着差异(p>0.05)。类内相关系数(ICC)表明大多数量表具有良好的可靠性,用Tele-FMA-LE,Tele-BBS,和Tele-RMI得分达到0.81、0.78和0.84的值。Tele-POMA-G评分显示中等可靠性(ICC=0.72)。加权κ(κw)对大多数单个项目显示良好至优异的可靠性(κw>0.60)。Tele-FMA-LE的MDC,Tele-BBS,Tele-POMA-G,和Tele-RMI分别为5.84、8.10、2.74和1.31。Bland-Altman分析显示,所有量表的远程评估和面对面评估之间都有足够的一致性。这五个维度肯定了远程评估的稳健可行性:评估时间,主观疲劳感知,总体偏好,参与者满意度,和系统可用性。
    结论:该研究证明了良好的平行形式可靠性,最小的可检测变化,四个远程康复版本的移动性相关功能量表(Tele-FMA-LE,Tele-BBS,Tele-POMA-G,和Tele-RMI)在中风幸存者中。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the parallel-forms reliability, minimal detectable change with 95% confidence interval (MDC95), and feasibility of the 4 telerehabilitation version mobility-related function scales: Fugl-Meyer Assessment-lower extremity subscale (Tele-FMA-LE), Berg Balance Scale (Tele-BBS), Tinetti Performance Oriented Mobility Assessment-Gait subscale (Tele-POMA-G), and Rivermead Mobility Index (Tele-RMI).
    METHODS: Reliability and agreement study and cross-sectional study.
    METHODS: Medical center.
    METHODS: Stroke survivors\' ability to independently walk 3 meters with assistive devices, age of ≥18 years for participants and their partners, stable physical condition, and absence of cognitive impairment (N=60).
    METHODS: Not applicable.
    METHODS: Parallel-forms reliability and MDC95 of Tele-FMA-LE, Tele-BBS, Tele-POMA-G, and Tele-RMI.
    RESULTS: No significant differences (P>.05) were observed among the mean scores of the telerehabilitation version and face-to-face version mobility-related function scales. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) indicated good reliability for most scales, with Tele-FMA-LE, Tele-BBS, and Tele-RMI scores achieving values of 0.81, 0.78, and 0.84. Tele-POMA-G scores demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC=0.72). Weighted kappa (κw) showed good-to-excellent reliability for most individual items (κw>0.60). The MDCs of the Tele-FMA-LE, Tele-BBS, Tele-POMA-G, and Tele-RMI were 5.84, 8.10, 2.74, and 1.31, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis showed adequate agreement between tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment for all scales. The 5 dimensions affirm the robust feasibility of tele-assessment: assessment time, subjective fatigue perception, overall preference, participant satisfaction, and system usability.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates good parallel-forms reliability, MDC, and promising feasibility of the 4 telerehabilitation version mobility-related function scales (Tele-FMA-LE, Tele-BBS, Tele-POMA-G, and Tele-RMI) in survivors of stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移动性限制,内在能力受损的表现,是功能下降的第一个明显迹象。然而,关于行动不便的患病率和发生率的研究很少。本研究旨在评估中国老年人(60岁以上)行动不便的患病率和发生率,并评估其对死亡率的影响。
    方法:本研究使用了2011年和2013年中国健康与退休纵向研究(CHARLS)的两波数据。使用世界卫生组织在老年人综合护理指南中推荐的方法评估了行动受限的患病率和发生率,使用五次静坐试验作为筛查,然后使用短物理性能电池评估进行诊断。采用多变量logistic回归分析行动不便与死亡之间的关系。
    结果:在具有完整基线数据的5507名参与者中,1486年流动性有限,4021在基线时具有完整的流动性;4093名参与者在2年后完成了随访评估,在基线和随访评估之间有189人死亡.在完成随访流动性评估的2828名基线流动性完好的参与者中,408发达的流动性限制。标准化患病率为30.4%(95%CI=28.8-32.1%)。2年内行动受限的标准化发生率为18.1%(95%CI=15.8-20.4%)。随访期间共有189例患者死亡。在调整社会人口因素和慢性病后,活动受限与死亡风险增加相关(比值比=1.84,95%CI=1.33-2.55,P<.001).
    结论:居住在社区的中国老年人行动受限的标准化患病率为30.4%,标准化发病率为18.1%。流动性限制显著预测老年人2年死亡。这表明早期筛查,评估内在能力(特别是运动领域)以及针对老年人行动不便的量身定制干预措施可能会降低死亡率.
    Mobility limitation, a manifestation of impaired intrinsic capacity, is the first obvious sign of functional decline. However, few studies have been conducted on the prevalence and incidence of mobility limitation. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of mobility limitation in Chinese older adults (over 60 years old) and evaluate its impact on mortality.
    The study used two waves of data from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) in 2011 and 2013. The prevalence and incidence of mobility limitation were assessed using the methods recommended by the World Health Organization in the integrated care for older people guidelines, using the five-time sit-to-stand test as a screening and then the Short Physical Performance Battery assessment for diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association between mobility limitation and death.
    Of the 5507 participants with complete baseline data, 1486 had limited mobility, and 4021 had intact mobility at baseline; 4093 participants completed follow-up assessment 2 years later, and 189 died between the baseline and follow-up assessments. Of the 2828 participants with intact mobility at baseline who completed the follow-up mobility assessment, 408 developed mobility limitation. The standardized prevalence was 30.4% (95% CI = 28.8-32.1 %). The standardized incidence of mobility limitation in 2 years was 18.1% (95% CI = 15.8-20.4 %). A total of 189 patients died during the follow-up period. After adjusting for sociodemographic factors and chronic diseases, mobility limitation was associated with an increased risk of death (odds ratio = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.33-2.55, P < .001).
    The standardized prevalence of mobility limitation in Chinese older adults living in the community was 30.4%, and the standardized incidence was 18.1%. Mobility limitation significantly predicts 2-year death in older adults. This suggests that early screening, assessment of intrinsic capacity (particularly locomotion domain) as well as tailored interventions to tackle mobility limitation in older adults might reduce mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多发病率(即≥2慢性疾病)和失禁(即尿和/或粪便失禁)之间的关系研究不足。这项研究调查了50岁以上中国成年人多发病与尿失禁之间的关系。
    方法:使用2011年和2015年中国健康与退休纵向研究的数据。12种慢性病之间的关联,使用加权逻辑回归模型分析多发病率和新发尿失禁。进行了中介分析,以探索潜在的中介(自我报告的健康状况,主观记忆,抑郁症状,残疾,认知功能,握力,流动性限制,药物和虚弱状态)介于多发病率和失禁之间。
    结果:在9,986名年龄≥50岁的人中,5.3%(n=521)在4年后出现新的失禁(事件病例)。尿失禁的风险随身体多发病率而增加(OR2.04,95%CI1.62-2.57)。与没有慢性病相比,患有1、2、3和≥4种慢性疾病与尿失禁相关,OR(95%CI):1.41(1.01-1.97),1.74(1.24-2.44),2.82(1.93-4.12)和3.99(2.29-6.95),分别。多发病和失禁之间的关联是由自我报告的健康状况介导的(41.2%),药物(26.6%),流动性限制(20.9%),抑郁症状(12.8%),残疾(11.6%),主观记忆(8.7%)和虚弱状态(8.3%)。
    结论:这项纵向研究发现,在50岁以上的中国成年人中,身体多发病和特定的慢性疾病可能会增加新发尿失禁的风险。自我报告的健康状况,药物治疗和活动受限似乎是介于多发病和意外失禁之间的重要中间条件。
    The relationship between multimorbidity (i.e. ≥ 2 chronic conditions) and incontinence (i.e. urinary and/or faecal incontinence) is underexplored. This study investigated the association between multimorbidity and incident incontinence in Chinese adults aged ≥50 years.
    Data from the 2011 and 2015 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study were used. The association between 12 chronic conditions, multimorbidity and new-onset incontinence was analysed using weighted logistic regression models. Mediation analysis was conducted to explore the potential mediators (self-reported health, subjective memory, depressive symptoms, disability, cognitive function, handgrip strength, mobility limitations, medications and frailty status) between multimorbidity and incontinence.
    Among 9,986 individuals aged ≥50 years who were continent at baseline, 5.3% (n = 521) were newly incontinent 4 years later (incident cases). The risk of incident incontinence increased with physical multimorbidity (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.62-2.57). Compared to no chronic condition, having 1, 2, 3 and ≥ 4 chronic conditions were associated with incident incontinence with OR (95% CI): 1.41 (1.01-1.97), 1.74 (1.24-2.44), 2.82 (1.93-4.12) and 3.99 (2.29-6.95), respectively. The association between multimorbidity and incontinence was mediated by self-reported health (41.2%), medications (26.6%), mobility limitations (20.9%), depressive symptoms (12.8%), disability (11.6%), subjective memory (8.7%) and frailty status (8.3%).
    This longitudinal study found that physical multimorbidity and specific chronic conditions may increase the risk of new-onset incontinence among Chinese adults aged ≥50 years. Self-reported health, medications and mobility limitations seemed to be important intermediate conditions between multimorbidity and incident incontinence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    描述和分析社区老年人生活空间流动的研究现状。PubMed中的文献,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Embase,EBSCOhost,Scopus,OpenGrey,SinoMed,CNKI,万方,VIP数据库被电脑搜索,时间框架建立在2023年5月23日。共纳入42篇文献,包括35个英文和7个中文,其中30项为横断面研究。与空间迁移率相关的理论模型包括“同心圆”模型和“锥”模型。33篇文献报道了空间流动性限制的患病率或水平,使用了9种评估工具,影响因素可分为四类。9篇文献报道了不良反应,9篇文献报道了预防和干预措施。生活空间流动的限制是社区老年人中常见且未得到充分认可的现象,有严重的不良影响,影响因素复杂多样。
    To describe and analyze the current research status of life-space mobility of the older persons in community. The literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCOhost, Scopus, OpenGrey, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases was computer searched, and the time frame was build to May 23, 2023. A total of 42 literatures were included, including 35 in English and 7 in Chinese, 30 of which were cross-sectional studies. Theoretical models related to spatial mobility included the \"concentric circles\" model and the \"cone\" model. 33 literatures reported the prevalence or level of spatial mobility limitations, and 9 assessment instruments were used, The influencing factors can be divided into four categories. 9 literatures reported on the adverse effects, and 9 literatures reported on the prevention and intervention. The limitation of life-space mobility is a common and under-recognized phenomenon among the older persons in the community,with serious adverse effects, complex and diverse influencing factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号