Cholecystitis, Acute

胆囊炎, 急性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆囊切除术仍然是急性胆囊炎的标准治疗方法。鉴于非手术管理的比率有所增加,我们假设手术率存在显著的医院水平变异性.因此,我们对在正常和低等手术医院接受非手术治疗的患者进行了表征(>第90百分位数).
    方法:使用2016-2019年全国再入院数据库查询所有急性胆囊炎成人入院。中心按非手术率排序,使用多层次,混合效果建模。非手术率最高的医院(>9.4%)被归类为低手术医院(LOH;其他:nLOH)。建立单独的回归模型来确定与LOH和nLOH非手术治疗相关的因素。
    结果:在估计的418,545名患者中,9.9%在880LOH时管理。多水平建模表明,20.6%的变异性仅归因于医院因素。调整后,年龄较大(调整后赔率[AOR]1.02/年,95%置信区间[CI]1.01-1.02)和公共保险(MedicareAOR1.31,CI1.21-1.43和MedicaidAOR1.43,CI1.31-1.57;参考:私人保险)与LOH的非手术管理有关。这些在nLOH是相似的。在LOH,SNH状态(AOR1.17,CI1.07-1.28)和小机构规模(AOR1.20,CI1.09-1.34)与非手术治疗的几率增加相关。
    结论:我们注意到急性胆囊炎非手术治疗的院际差异存在显著差异。然而,可比较的临床和社会经济因素有助于LOH和非LOH的非手术治疗.解决持续的非临床差异的定向策略对于最大程度地减少与标准方案的偏差并确保公平护理是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy remains the standard management for acute cholecystitis. Given that rates of nonoperative management have increased, we hypothesize the existence of significant hospital-level variability in operative rates. Thus, we characterized patients who were managed nonoperatively at normal and lower operative hospitals (>90th percentile).
    METHODS: All adult admissions for acute cholecystitis were queried using the 2016-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Centers were ranked by nonoperative rate using multi-level, mixed effects modeling. Hospitals in the top decile of nonoperative rate (>9.4%) were classified as Low Operative Hospitals (LOH; others:nLOH). Separate regression models were created to determine factors associated with nonoperative management at LOH and nLOH.
    RESULTS: Of an estimated 418,545 patients, 9.9% were managed at 880 LOH. Multilevel modeling demonstrated that 20.6% of the variability was due to hospital factors alone. After adjustment, older age (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 1.02/year, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.01-1.02) and public insurance (Medicare AOR 1.31, CI 1.21-1.43 and Medicaid AOR 1.43, CI 1.31-1.57; reference: Private Insurance) were associated with nonoperative management at LOH. These were similar at nLOH. At LOH, SNH status (AOR 1.17, CI 1.07-1.28) and small institution size (AOR 1.20, CI 1.09-1.34) were associated with increased odds of nonoperative management.
    CONCLUSIONS: We noted a significant variability in the interhospital variation of the nonoperative management of acute cholecystitis. Nevertheless, comparable clinical and socioeconomic factors contribute to nonoperative management at both LOH and non-LOH. Directed strategies to address persistent non-clinical disparities are necessary to minimize deviation from standard protocol and ensure equitable care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究回顾性评估了在急性胆囊炎(AC)高危患者中,使用新型电灼增强的腔内贴壁金属支架(LAMS)进行内镜超声引导下胆囊引流(EUS-GBD)的结果。在2021年1月1日至2022年11月30日之间,58例AC高危手术患者接受了新型电灼增强LAMS的EUS-GBD。技术成功率为94.8%(55/58),1例十二指肠穿孔需要手术,支架完全移位,2例支架部分移位进入胆囊。然而,临床成功率为100%(55/55)。复发AC发生在3.6%的病例中(2/55),通过LAMS用双尾纤塑料支架管理。观察到由于支架阻塞导致的早期AE为1.8%(1/55)。晚期不良事件发生率为5.4%(3/55),包括2例胆管炎和1例支架阻塞。对于33名患者,随访超过6个月,30例维持LAMS。两名患者在LAMS移除后接受了双尾纤塑料支架置换术,其中一人在胆管癌化疗后肿瘤分期消退后在手术期间接受了LAMS切除。新型电灼增强的LAMS在高风险的AC手术患者中显示出很高的技术和临床成功率,在长期随访期间保持有效的胆囊引流,并将不良事件降至最低,从而突出了其在挑战性患者中的疗效和安全性。
    This study retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) using novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis (AC). Between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2022, 58 high-risk surgical patients with AC underwent EUS-GBD with the novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS. The technical success rate was 94.8% (55/58), with one case of duodenal perforation requiring surgery with complete stent migration and two of partial stent migration into the gallbladder. However, the clinical success rate was 100% (55/55). Recurrent AC occurred in 3.6% of the cases (2/55), managed with double pigtail plastic stents through the LAMS. Early AEs observed in 1.8% (1/55) due to stent obstruction. Late AEs occurred in 5.4% (3/55), including two cases of cholangitis and one of stent obstruction. For 33 patients followed over 6 months, LAMS maintenance was sustained in 30 cases. Two patients underwent double-pigtail plastic stent replacement after LAMS removal, and one underwent LAMS removal during surgery following tumor stage regression after chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma. The novel electrocautery-enhanced LAMS demonstrated high technical and clinical success rates in high-risk surgical patients with AC, maintaining effective gallbladder drainage with minimal AEs during long-term follow-up, thus highlighting its efficacy and safety in challenging patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,治疗性内窥镜检查已成为胆囊疾病的基本工具,鉴于其最小的侵入性,临床疗效高,和良好的安全性。内镜经乳头胆囊引流(TGBD)和内镜超声(EUS)引导胆囊引流(EUS-GBD)为不适合胆囊切除术的急性胆囊炎患者提供有效的内引流。避免了经皮胆囊外引流术(PGBD)的弊端。用于EUS引导的腔内干预的专用腔内金属支架(LAMS)的可用性有助于扩大急性胆囊炎的内窥镜治疗。使内镜下胆囊引流更容易,更快,因此更广泛地可用。此外,使用LAMS的EUS-GBD打开了几种胆囊镜检查指导干预措施的可能性,如胆结石碎石和清除。最后,EUS-GBD也被提议作为标准技术失败后恶性胆道梗阻的抢救引流方式。结果令人鼓舞。在这次审查中,我们将描述TBGD和EUS-GBD技术,我们将讨论与PGBD相比,不同环境下临床疗效的可用数据。最后,我们将评论EUS-GBD的未来前景,讨论更强烈期待新数据的不确定性领域。
    In recent years, therapeutic endoscopy has become a fundamental tool in the management of gallbladder diseases in light of its minimal invasiveness, high clinical efficacy, and good safety profile. Both endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (TGBD) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD) provide effective internal drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis unfit for cholecystectomy, avoiding the drawbacks of external percutaneous gallbladder drainage (PGBD). The availability of dedicated lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for EUS-guided transluminal interventions contributed to the expansion of endoscopic therapies for acute cholecystitis, making endoscopic gallbladder drainage easier, faster, and hence more widely available. Moreover, EUS-GBD with LAMS opened the possibility of several cholecystoscopy-guided interventions, such as gallstone lithotripsy and clearance. Finally, EUS-GBD has also been proposed as a rescue drainage modality in malignant biliary obstruction after failure of standard techniques, with encouraging results. In this review, we will describe the TBGD and EUS-GBD techniques, and we will discuss the available data on clinical efficacy in different settings in comparison with PGBD. Finally, we will comment on the future perspectives of EUS-GBD, discussing the areas of uncertainty in which new data are more strongly awaited.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在调查急性和慢性胆囊炎患者血清外泌体微生物组成的差异。
    方法:通过离心法从胆囊炎患者的血清中分离外泌体,并使用透射电子显微镜和纳米流式细胞术进行鉴定和表征。使用16SrRNA测序进行微生物区系分析。
    结果:与慢性胆囊炎患者相比,急性胆囊炎患者的丰富度和多样性较低。β多样性分析显示,急性和慢性胆囊炎患者之间的微生物组成存在显着差异。在急性胆囊炎患者的外泌体中,变形杆菌的相对丰度明显较高,而放线菌,拟杆菌,和Firmicutes在慢性胆囊炎患者的外泌体中明显更丰富。此外,使用Tax4Fun分析对微生物群落的功能预测揭示了氨基酸代谢等代谢途径的显着差异,碳水化合物代谢,和两个患者组之间的膜运输。
    结论:本研究证实了急性和慢性胆囊炎患者血清外泌体中微生物组成的差异。血清外泌体可作为鉴别急性和慢性胆囊炎的诊断指标。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the differences in the microbiota composition of serum exosomes from patients with acute and chronic cholecystitis.
    METHODS: Exosomes were isolated from the serum of cholecystitis patients through centrifugation and identified and characterized using transmission electron microscopy and nano-flow cytometry. Microbiota analysis was performed using 16S rRNA sequencing.
    RESULTS: Compared to patients with chronic cholecystitis, those with acute cholecystitis exhibited lower richness and diversity. Beta diversity analysis revealed significant differences in the microbiota composition between patients with acute and chronic cholecystitis. The relative abundance of Proteobacteria was significantly higher in exosomes from patients with acute cholecystitis, whereas Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were significantly more abundant in exosomes from patients with chronic cholecystitis. Furthermore, functional predictions of microbial communities using Tax4Fun analysis revealed significant differences in metabolic pathways such as amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and membrane transport between the two patient groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the differences in the microbiota composition within serum exosomes of patients with acute and chronic cholecystitis. Serum exosomes could serve as diagnostic indicators for distinguishing acute and chronic cholecystitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是确定C反应蛋白等标志物的意义,降钙素原,全血细胞计数参数,中性粒细胞指数,缺血修饰白蛋白,presepsin,和氧化应激指标,与炎症有关,氧化应激,和缺血在成人急性胆囊炎的病理和诊断中的应用。
    方法:将急诊科诊断为急性胆囊炎的患者和对照组的健康个体纳入研究。对参与者进行常规血细胞计数和生化分析。血清用于测量缺血修饰白蛋白,presepsin,和氧化应激指标。
    结果:白细胞计数,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,血小板与淋巴细胞比率,中性粒细胞指数,C反应蛋白,降钙素原,缺血修饰白蛋白,缺血修饰的白蛋白与白蛋白之比,presepsin,胆囊炎患者的氧化应激指标明显高于对照组。白细胞计数的测量,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,血小板与淋巴细胞比率,和delta中性粒细胞指数可以作为全血细胞计数的一部分。全血细胞计数参数是容易获得的,并且不会给医疗保健系统带来额外的成本。
    结论:作者认为中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,中性粒细胞指数,缺血修饰白蛋白,缺血修饰的白蛋白与白蛋白之比,Presepsin值具有较高的敏感性,可作为诊断急性胆囊炎的新指标,特异性,和低的负似然比。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine the significance of markers such as C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, complete blood count parameters, delta neutrophil index, ischemia-modified albumin, presepsin, and oxidative stress indicators, which are associated with inflammation, oxidative stress, and ischemia in the pathology and diagnosis of acute cholecystitis in adults.
    METHODS: Patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis in the emergency department and healthy individuals in the control group were included in the study. Routine blood count and biochemistry analyses were performed on the participants. Blood serum was used to measure ischemia-modified albumin, presepsin, and oxidative stress indicators.
    RESULTS: White blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, delta neutrophil index, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ischemia-modified albumin, ischemia-modified albumin to albumin ratio, presepsin, and oxidative stress indicators were significantly higher in patients with cholecystitis compared to the control group. Measurements of white blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and delta neutrophil index can be included as part of the complete blood count. The complete blood count parameters are readily available and do not incur additional costs to the healthcare system.
    CONCLUSIONS: The authors believe that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, delta neutrophil index, ischemia-modified albumin, ischemia-modified albumin to albumin ratio, and presepsin values can be used as new markers in the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis due to their high sensitivity, specificity, and low negative likelihood ratio.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性非结石性胆囊炎(AAC)代表无胆结石的胆囊炎,约5-10%的成人急性胆囊炎病例。已经认识到几个危险因素,而传染病可能是其他健康人群胆囊炎的原因。2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)由严重急性呼吸道综合症冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起,并已在全球范围内传播,导致前所未有的大流行。病毒通过刺突蛋白与许多人体组织中表达的血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)受体结合进入细胞,包括胃肠道(GI)的上皮细胞,这解释了消化系统的症状。据报道,COVID-19患者出现急性胆囊炎。这篇综述的目的是对目前关于发病机制的文献进行详细分析,诊断,管理,以及COVID-19患者的AAC结果。
    Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) represents cholecystitis without gallstones, occurring in approximately 5-10% of all cases of acute cholecystitis in adults. Several risk factors have been recognized, while infectious diseases can be a cause of cholecystitis in otherwise healthy people. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and has spread worldwide, leading to an unprecedented pandemic. The virus enters cells through the binding of the spike protein to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors expressed in many human tissues, including the epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and this explains the symptoms emanating from the digestive system. Acute cholecystitis has been reported in patients with COVID-19. The purpose of this review is to provide a detailed analysis of the current literature on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of AAC in patients with COVID-19.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:教科书结局患者是指手术过程顺利通过的患者,无并发症,再入院或死亡。缺乏关于急性胆囊炎的TO方面的出版物。
    目的:本研究的目的是分析急性胆囊炎紧急早期胆囊切除术(UEC)患者的TO成就。并确定哪些因素与实现TO相关。
    方法:这是SPRiMACC研究的事后研究。这是一项由WSES进行的前瞻性多中心观察性研究。在紧急早期胆囊切除术(TOUEC)中定义TO的标准是无30天死亡率,无术后30天并发症,30天内没有再入院,住院时间≤7天(第75百分位数),和全腹腔镜手术。满足所有这些条件的患者被视为呈现TOUEC。
    结果:1246例紧急早期胆囊切除术治疗ACC。总之,789名患者(63.3%)达到所有TOUEC参数,而457(36.6%)未能达到一个或多个参数,被认为是非TOUEC。在所有分析的风险量表上,达到TOUEC的患者更年轻,得分明显较低。在血清学测试中,TOUEC患者在许多变量中的值低于非TOUEC患者。TOUEC组并发胆囊炎的发生率较低。考虑到手术时间,较短的持续时间也与较高的到达TOUEC的概率相关.
    结论:了解影响TOUEC的因素可以使我们在教科书结果方面改善结果。
    A textbook outcome patient is one in which the operative course passes uneventful, without complications, readmission or mortality. There is a lack of publications in terms of TO on acute cholecystitis.
    The objective of this study is to analyze the achievement of TO in patients with urgent early cholecystectomy (UEC) for Acute Cholecystitis. and to identify which factors are related to achieving TO.
    This is a post hoc study of the SPRiMACC study. It´s a prospective multicenter observational study run by WSES. The criteria to define TO in urgent early cholecystectomy (TOUEC) were no 30-day mortality, no 30-day postoperative complications, no readmission within 30 days, and hospital stay ≤ 7 days (75th percentile), and full laparoscopic surgery. Patients who met all these conditions were taken as presenting a TOUEC.
    1246 urgent early cholecystectomies for ACC were included. In all, 789 patients (63.3%) achieved all TOUEC parameters, while 457 (36.6%) failed to achieve one or more parameters and were considered non-TOUEC. The patients who achieved TOUEC were younger had significantly lower scores on all the risk scales analyzed. In the serological tests, TOUEC patients had lower values for in a lot of variables than non-TOUEC patients. The TOUEC group had lower rates of complicated cholecystitis. Considering operative time, a shorter duration was also associated with a higher probability of reaching TOUEC.
    Knowledge of the factors that influence the TOUEC can allow us to improve our results in terms of textbook outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是良性胆道疾病患者的首选治疗方法。有必要评估80岁以上患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术后的生存率,以确定长期死亡率是否高于报告的复发率。如果是,这个年龄组可以从更保守的方法中受益,如抗生素治疗或胆囊造口术。因此,本研究的目的是评估80岁以上患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术后2年生存率的相关因素.
    方法:我们进行了一项回顾性观察性队列研究。我们包括所有80岁以上接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者。使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析。进行Cox回归分析以确定与24个月时死亡率相关的潜在因素。
    结果:总共144名患者被纳入研究,其中37人(25.69%)在两年的随访中死亡。比较不同ASA组的生存曲线,显示在被分类为ASA1-2的患者中,两年存活的比例较高,为87.50%,而ASA3-4为63.75%(p=0.001).ASA评分3-4分被确定为与死亡率相关的统计学显著因素。表明风险较高(HR:2.71,CI95%:1.20-6.14)。
    结论:ASA3-4例患者可从保守治疗中获益,因为他们2年死亡风险较高,疾病复发概率较低。
    BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with benign biliary disease. It is necessary to evaluate survival after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients over 80 years old to determine whether the long-term mortality rate is higher than the reported recurrence rate. If so, this age group could benefit from a more conservative approach, such as antibiotic treatment or cholecystostomy. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with 2 years survival after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients over 80 years old.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study. We included all patients over 80 years old who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan‒Meier method. Cox regression analysis was implemented to determine potential factors associated with mortality at 24 months.
    RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included in the study, of whom 37 (25.69%) died at the two-year follow-up. Survival curves were compared for different ASA groups, showing a higher proportion of survivors at two years among patients classified as ASA 1-2 at 87.50% compared to ASA 3-4 at 63.75% (p = 0.001). An ASA score of 3-4 was identified as a statistically significant factor associated with mortality, indicating a higher risk (HR: 2.71, CI95%:1.20-6.14).
    CONCLUSIONS: ASA 3-4 patients may benefit from conservative management due to their higher risk of mortality at 2 years and a lower probability of disease recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮胆囊造口管(PCT)是治疗急性胆囊炎的常规首选非手术干预措施。然而,PCT受到高不良事件发生率的困扰,需要定期的重新干预,和无意的移位,以及患者对经皮引流的不满。内镜治疗的最新进展涉及内镜经乳头引流(ETP-GBD)和内镜超声引导胆囊引流(EUS-GBD)的实施。由于其有利的技术和临床成功以及较低的并发症发生率,它们越来越优于PCT。在这篇文章中,我们对EUS-GBD和ETP-GBD的文献进行了全面的综述,描述临床医生应选择内镜治疗的情况,并强调与每种方法相关的潜在风险.
    A percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (PCT) is the conventionally favored nonoperative intervention for treating acute cholecystitis. However, PCT is beset by high adverse event rates, need for scheduled reintervention, and inadvertent dislodgement, as well as patient dissatisfaction with a percutaneous drain. Recent advances in endoscopic therapy involve the implementation of endoscopic transpapillary drainage (ETP-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD), which are increasingly preferred over PCT due to their favorable technical and clinical success combined with lower complication rates. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the literature on EUS-GBD and ETP-GBD, delineating instances when clinicians should opt for endoscopic management and highlighting potential risks associated with each approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的主要目的是探讨在急性胆囊炎的调查和诊断过程中发现胆囊癌的患者的预后。原发性胆囊癌在急性胆囊炎中的发病率在文献中没有很好的定义。轶事报告表明,他们的预后比偶然发现的胆囊癌患者差。
    方法:对1998年至2022年5月在堪培拉卫生服务局治疗的所有胆囊癌患者进行了回顾性审查。
    结果:在研究期间,共有65例患者被诊断为原发性胆囊癌,平均年龄为70.4岁(SD11.4,范围59-81.8岁),女性优势(74%对26%),比例为2.8。20例(31%)患者出现急性结石性胆囊炎,并被发现患有原发性胆囊癌。这组患者年龄较大,以女性为主,但差异无统计学意义。该队列的5年总生存率为20%(1期63%,第二阶段23%,阶段316%,和阶段40%)。急性胆囊炎患者与其他患者之间的生存率没有统计学上的显着差异。
    结论:1/3的胆囊癌患者表现为急性胆囊炎。胆囊切除术中胆汁溢出的患者以及急性胆囊炎患者的生存率没有统计学上的显着差异。
    The main purpose of this study is to explore the outcomes of patients found to have gallbladder cancer during investigation and diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. The incidence of primary gallbladder cancer co-existing in acute cholecystitis is not well defined in the literature, with anecdotal reports suggesting that they experience worse outcomes than patients with gallbladder cancer found incidentally.
    METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with gallbladder cancer managed at the Canberra Health Service between 1998 and May 2022 were identified and reviewed.
    RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were diagnosed with primary gallbladder cancer during the study period with a mean age of 70.4 years (SD 11.4, range 59-81.8 years) and a female preponderance (74% versus 26%) with a ratio of 2.8. Twenty (31%) patients presented with acute calculus cholecystitis and were found to have a primary gallbladder cancer. This group of patients were older and predominantly female, but the difference was not statistically significant. The overall 5-year survival in the cohort was 20% (stage 1 63%, stage 2 23%, stage 3 16%, and stage 4 0%). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between those who presented with acute cholecystitis vs other presentations.
    CONCLUSIONS: A third of the patients with gallbladder cancer presented with acute cholecystitis. There was no statistically significant difference in survival in those with bile spillage during cholecystectomy as well those presenting with acute cholecystitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号