polypharmacy

Polypharmacy
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多重用药在患有精神疾病的老年人中很常见,但是对于评估多重用药中药物-药物相互作用(DDI)的益处和风险的可靠指标尚未达成共识。我们旨在确定适合评估DDI在患有精神疾病的老年人多重用药中的临床意义的指标。
    方法:使用在线工具分发和收集问卷。采用德尔菲法分析专家意见。利用变异系数分析了专家的权威性和协调性,协调系数,专家的判断因素,熟悉学习内容因素,和肯德尔协调系数。使用IBMSPSS®StatisticsPackage版本26.0进行统计分析。
    结果:经过三轮专家咨询,确定了5个主要指标和11个次要指标。主要的“药效学指标”包括“药物不良反应的严重程度”,“药物不良反应的持续时间”,“症状缓解”,“症状缓解开始的时间”,\"住院天数\",和“药物持续时间”。次要“药代动力学指标”包含“给药剂量”和“给药间隔”。主要的“患者耐受性指标”包含一个次要指标“患者耐受性”。主要指标“患者依从性”包含一个次要指标“患者对药物的依从性”。主要指标“药物组合成本”包含一个次要指标“再接纳”。这些指标用于确定在多重用药期间DDI的临床意义。
    结论:老年患者使用复方制剂时,应考虑联合用药的临床意义。五个主要指标和11个次要指标可能是评估其风险和收益的首选。该人群的药物管理需要多学科团队,其中护士起着关键作用。未来的研究应该集中在如何建立有效的多学科团队工作流程,并使用功能因素来评估多药治疗精神疾病的DDI。
    BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy is common in older adults with psychiatric disorders, but no consensus has reached about the reliable indicators evaluating the benefits and risks of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in polypharmacy. We aimed to identify indicators suitable for evaluating the clinical significance of DDIs in polypharmacy in older adults with psychiatric disorders.
    METHODS: The online tools were used to distribute and collect the questionnaires. The Delphi method was applied to analyze experts\' opinions. The degree of authority and coordination of experts were analyzed using the coefficient of variation, coefficient of coordination, expert\'s judgment factor, familiarity with the study content factor, and Kendall coordination coefficient. Statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM SPSS® Statistics Package version 26.0.
    RESULTS: After three rounds of expert consultation, five primary and eleven secondary indicators were identified. The primary \"pharmacodynamic indicator\" included \"severity of adverse drug reactions\", \"duration of adverse drug reaction\", \"symptom relief\", \"time to onset of symptomatic relief\", \"number of days in hospital\", and \"duration of medication\". The secondary \"pharmacokinetic indicator\" contained \"dosage administered\" and \"dosing intervals\". The primary \"patient tolerance indicator\" contained one secondary indicator of \"patient tolerability\". The primary indicator \"patient adherence\" contained one secondary indicator of \"patient adherence to medication\". The primary indicator \"cost of drug combination\" contained one secondary indicator of \"readmission\". These indicators were used to determine the clinical significance of DDIs during polypharmacy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical significance of drug combinations should be taken into account when polypharmacy is used in the elderly. The five primary indicators and eleven secondary indicators might be preferred to evaluate their risks and benefits. Medication management in this population requires a multidisciplinary team, in which nurses play a key role. Future research should focus on how to establish efficient multidisciplinary team workflows and use functional factors to assess DDIs in polypharmacy for psychiatric disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可能不适当的药物(PIM)使用是老年患者的常见问题。这项研究旨在比较新诊断的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的老年患者中PIMs的患病率。并确定PIM的相关性。
    对前瞻性队列研究进行了二次分析。从2014年1月至2020年12月招募患者,并从患者的电子病历(EMR)中提取信息。我们使用四种不同的PIM标准评估了PIM。使用kappa检验计算四个PIM标准之间的一致性。采用多因素logistic回归分析与PIMs相关的可能危险因素。
    在514名患者中,由四个标准确定的至少一种PIM的患病率范围为25.1%至48.2%。GO-PIM量表与AGS/Beers标准之间存在中度一致性,而与其他标准(STOPP标准和中国标准)的一致性较差。在所有标准中发现多重用药与PIM的发生显著相关(p<0.001)。
    我们的结果显示,老年非小细胞肺癌患者中PIMs的患病率很高,这与多重用药密切相关,四项标准的一致性从低到中等。
    UNASSIGNED: Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use is a common problem among older patients. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of PIMs in older patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and to identify the correlates of PIMs.
    UNASSIGNED: A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2020 and information were extracted from patients\' electronic medical records (EMRs). We evaluated the PIMs using four different PIM criteria. The concordance among the four PIM criteria was calculated using kappa tests. The possible risk factors associated with PIMs were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.
    UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of at least one PIM identified by the four criteria ranged from 25.1% to 48.2% among 514 patients. There was moderate consistency between the GO-PIM scale and the AGS/Beers criteria, while poor consistency with the other criteria (the STOPP criteria and the Chinese criteria). Polypharmacy was found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of PIMs in all criteria (p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Our results showed a high prevalence of PIMs in older patients with NSCLC, which was significantly associated with polypharmacy, and the consistency across the four criteria was poor-to-moderate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多重用药会增加老年人发生不良药物事件的风险和肾脏药物排泄的负担。然而,用药数量与慢性肾脏病(CKD)风险之间的关联仍存在争议.因此,本研究旨在探讨老年人中药物治疗数量与CKD发病率之间的关系.
    方法:本研究调查了2019年至2022年中国南方社区卫生服务中心2672名老年人(≥65岁)的用药数量与CKD的关系。采用Logistic回归分析评价多重用药与CKD的关系。
    结果:在基线时,研究对象的平均年龄为71.86±4.60,61.2%为女性,53人(2.0%)患有多重用药。平均随访3年,413名(15.5%)参与者出现新发CKD.Logistic回归分析显示,服用较多药物与CKD的增加有关。与不服药的人相比,服用5种以上药物的老年人患CKD的风险较高(OR3.731,95%CI1.988,7.003),其次是服用四次的人(OR1.621,95%CI1.041,2.525),三(OR1.696,95%CI1.178,2.441),两种药物(OR1.585,95%CI1.167,2.153),或一种药物(OR1.503,95%CI1.097,2.053)。此外,年龄,收缩压(SBP),白细胞(WBC),尿素氮(BUN)和甘油三酯(TG)也是CKD的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。
    结论:老年患者的用药数量与CKD相关。随着服用药物数量的增加,CKD的风险增加.
    BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy would increase the risk of adverse drug events and the burden of renal drug excretion among older people. Nevertheless, the association between the number of medication and the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains controversial. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the association between the number of medication and the incidence of CKD in older people.
    METHODS: This study investigates the association between the number of medications and CKD in 2672 elderly people (≥ 65 years older) of the community health service center in southern China between 2019 and 2022. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between polypharmacy and CKD.
    RESULTS: At baseline, the average age of the study subjects was 71.86 ± 4.60, 61.2% were females, and 53 (2.0%) suffer from polypharmacy. During an average follow-up of 3 years, new-onset CKD developed in 413 (15.5%) participants. Logistic regression analysis revealed that taking a higher number of medications was associated with increase of CKD. Compared with people who didn\'t take medication, a higher risk of CKD was observed in the older people who taken more than five medications (OR 3.731, 95% CI 1.988, 7.003), followed by those who take four (OR 1.621, 95% CI 1.041, 2.525), three (OR 1.696, 95% CI 1.178, 2.441), two drugs (OR 1.585, 95% CI 1.167, 2.153), or one drug (OR 1.503, 95% CI 1.097, 2.053). Furthermore, age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), white blood cell (WBC), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and triglyceride (TG) were also independent risk factors CKD (P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of medications was associated with CKD in older people. As the number of medications taken increased, the risk of CKD was increased.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估用药依从性和家庭医疗支持如何影响多重用药在老年糖尿病患者低血糖事件中的作用。
    方法:本病例交叉研究检索了台湾2002年至2012年发生严重低血糖的65岁糖尿病患者的记录。将定义为严重低血糖前1-3天的病例期与相同长度的先前对照期进行比较,全冲洗期为30天.此外,我们通过分层分析评估了用药依从性和家庭保健服务使用的可改变效应.
    结果:共确认2,237例患者。多重用药与严重低血糖风险相关。没有家庭保健服务(aOR:1.34;95%CI:1.16-1.54)的患者和对抗糖尿病药物依从性差的患者(aOR:1.48;95%CI:1.24-1.77)与严重低血糖风险升高显著相关。在依从性良好的患者中,接受多重用药的非家庭保健患者发生严重低血糖的风险较高.在接受家庭保健服务的群体中,多用药依从性差的患者发生严重低血糖的风险较高.
    结论:良好的依从性和接受家庭保健服务与老年糖尿病患者发生严重低血糖事件的几率降低有关。不管他们是否开了复方药。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess how medication adherence and home healthcare support influence the role of polypharmacy in induced hypoglycemia events among elderly diabetic patients.
    METHODS: This case-crossover study retrieved records on diabetic patients >=65 years with severe hypoglycemia from 2002 to 2012 in Taiwan. Case period defined as 1-3 days before severe hypoglycemia was compared with a preceding control period of the same length, with an all-washout period of 30 days. Moreover, the modifiable effects of medication adherence and home healthcare service use were evaluated by stratified analysis.
    RESULTS: Totally 2,237 patients were identified. Polypharmacy use was associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia. Patients receiving polypharmacy without home healthcare services (aOR: 1.34; 95 % CI: 1.16-1.54) and those with poor adherence to anti-diabetic medications (aOR: 1.48; 95 % CI: 1.24-1.77) were significantly associated with an elevated risk of severe hypoglycemia. In patients with good adherence, non-home healthcare users being prescribed with polypharmacy had a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia. In the group that received home healthcare services, patients with poor adherence using polypharmacy had a higher risk of severe hypoglycemia.
    CONCLUSIONS: Good adherence and receiving home healthcare services were associated with a decreased odds of severe hypoglycemic events in elderly diabetic patients, regardless of the fact whether they were prescribed with polypharmacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虚弱是在进行透析的患者中经常观察到的病症。它的特点是生理和认知状态都下降,导致体重减轻等症状的组合,疲惫,低体力活动,弱点,缓慢的行走速度。虚弱的患者不仅生活质量差,但是他们住院的风险也更高,感染,心血管事件,透析相关并发症,和死亡。虚弱是由于透析患者中各种医学问题的组合和相互作用而发生的。不幸的是,没有治愈脆弱的方法。为了解决脆弱,多方面的方法是必要的,涉及肾病学家的协调努力,老年病学家,护士,专职医疗人员,和家庭成员。优化营养和CKD相关并发症等策略,通过处方减少多重用药,个性化透析处方和考虑家庭透析或辅助透析可能有助于减缓虚弱患者身体功能随时间的下降.这篇综述讨论了透析患者虚弱的根本原因,并研究了该组中管理虚弱的方法和困难。
    Frailty is a condition that is frequently observed among patients undergoing dialysis. Frailty is characterized by a decline in both physiological state and cognitive state, leading to a combination of symptoms, such as weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity level, weakness, and slow walking speed. Frail patients not only experience a poor quality of life, but also are at higher risk of hospitalization, infection, cardiovascular events, dialysis-associated complications, and death. Frailty occurs as a result of a combination and interaction of various medical issues in patients who are on dialysis. Unfortunately, frailty has no cure. To address frailty, a multifaceted approach is necessary, involving coordinated efforts from nephrologists, geriatricians, nurses, allied health practitioners, and family members. Strategies such as optimizing nutrition and chronic kidney disease-related complications, reducing polypharmacy by deprescription, personalizing dialysis prescription, and considering home-based or assisted dialysis may help slow the decline of physical function over time in subjects with frailty. This review discusses the underlying causes of frailty in patients on dialysis and examines the methods and difficulties involved in managing frailty among this group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:我们旨在研究美国2型糖尿病患者整体处方药使用趋势,为患者护理提供见解。
    方法:我们使用了1999年至2020年全国健康和营养调查的全国代表性数据,并纳入了2型糖尿病成年患者。我们检查了处方药的使用,总体上和按药物类别,多药(使用≥5种药物),以及归因于特定类别的药物数量。
    结果:在2015-2020年期间,患者的平均年龄为59.6(51.0-70.0)岁,其中46.8%(43.6-49.9)为女性,57.8%(52.8-62.8)为非西班牙裔白人。在9489名2型糖尿病成年人中,多药疗法的患病率很高,从1999-2002年的35.1%(31.6-38.6)上升至2003-2006年的47.2%(43.7-50.7),并进一步上升至2015-2020年的51.1%(48.3-53.9)(p<0.001).在所有人群亚组和大多数治疗类别中发现了多药疗法的增加趋势。使用非心脏代谢药物是常见的。其中,最常见的是抗抑郁药(19.8%),质子泵抑制剂(19.0%)和镇痛药(16.2%)。在多重用药的患者中,约40%的药物使用归因于非心脏代谢药物.
    结论:2型糖尿病患者的处方药负担和复杂性显著增加,超过50%的患者使用多种药物。应注意这种不断升级的药物使用和方案复杂性,这需要多学科和协调的护理。
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine trends in overall prescription medication use among patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States to provide insights for patient care.
    METHODS: We used nationally representative data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 1999 to 2020 and included adult patients with type 2 diabetes. We examined the use of prescription drugs, overall and by drug class, polypharmacy (use of ≥5 medications), and number of medications attributed to specific classes.
    RESULTS: In the period 2015-2020, the mean patient age was 59.6 (51.0-70.0) years, with 46.8% (43.6-49.9) being female and 57.8% (52.8-62.8) being non-Hispanic White. Among 9489 adults with type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of polypharmacy was high and increased from 35.1% (31.6-38.6) in 1999-2002 to 47.2% (43.7-50.7) in 2003-2006, and further to 51.1% (48.3-53.9) in 2015-2020 (p for trend <0.001). Increasing trends of polypharmacy were found across all population subgroups and across the majority of therapeutic classes. Use of non-cardiometabolic medications was common. Among them, the most common were antidepressants (19.8%), proton pump inhibitors (19.0%) and analgesics (16.2%). Among patients with polypharmacy, approximately 40% of medication use was attributed to non-cardiometabolic medications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prescription medication burden and complexity increased substantially among patients with type 2 diabetes, with more than 50% of patients with polypharmacy. Attention should be paid to this escalating medication use and regimen complexity, which requires multidisciplinary and coordinated care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏关于老年人用药数量和质量的当代数据。这项研究调查了美国老年人使用处方药的数量和适当性的最新趋势。
    方法:使用2011年至2020年3月的国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据,包括6336名65岁及以上的成年参与者。我们检查了处方药的数量,多药流行(≥5种处方药),使用可能不适当的药物(PIM),和使用推荐的药物(心力衰竭患者的ACEI/ARBs加β受体阻滞剂和蛋白尿患者的ACEI/ARBs)。
    结果:多重用药的患病率略有增加(2011-2012年为39.3%,2017-2020年为43.8%,趋势p=0.32)。抗高血压,抗高脂血症,抗糖尿病药物,抗抑郁药是最常用的药物。PIM的使用没有实质性变化(17.0%至14.7%)。不到50%的老年心力衰竭患者接受ACEI/ARBs加β受体阻滞剂(2017-2020年为44.3%),约50%的白蛋白尿患者接受ACEI/ARBs(2017-2020年为54.0)。在研究期间没有改善。多药,年龄较大,女性,较低的社会经济地位通常与较多的PIM使用但较少的推荐药物使用相关.
    结论:美国老年人的药物负担仍然很高,最近十年来药物的适当利用没有改善。我们的结果强调了需要对老年人的药物使用质量给予更多关注和干预。
    BACKGROUND: Contemporary data on the quantity and quality of medication use among older adults are lacking. This study examined recent trends in the number and appropriateness of prescription medication use among older adults in the United States.
    METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2011 and March 2020 were used, and 6 336 adult participants aged 65 and older were included. We examined the number of prescription medication, prevalence of polypharmacy (≥5 prescription drugs), use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM), and use of recommended medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACEI]/angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs] plus beta-blockers among patients with heart failure and ACEI/ARBs among patients with albuminuria).
    RESULTS: There has been a slight increase in the prevalence of polypharmacy (39.3% in 2011-2012 to 43.8% in 2017-2020, p for trend = .32). Antihypertensive, antihyperlipidemic, antidiabetic medications, and antidepressants are the most commonly used medications. There was no substantial change in the use of PIM (17.0% to 14.7%). Less than 50% of older adults with heart failure received ACEI/ARBs plus beta-blockers (44.3% in 2017-2020) and approximately 50% of patients with albuminuria received ACEI/ARBs (54.0% in 2017-2020), with no improvement over the study period. Polypharmacy, older age, female, and lower socioeconomic status were generally associated with greater use of PIM but lower use of recommended medications.
    CONCLUSIONS: The medication burden remained high among older adults in the United States and the appropriate utilization of medications did not improve in the recent decade. Our results underscore the need for greater attentions and interventions to the quality of medication use among older adults.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:各个医疗系统的开药机会可能不同,疗养院设置,和规定文化。这项研究的目的是根据澳大利亚疗养院居民的虚弱状况比较STOPPFrail药物的患病率,中国,Japan,和西班牙。
    方法:对4项队列研究的数据进行二级横断面分析。
    方法:31所疗养院共1142名居民。
    方法:从居民记录中提取用药数据。使用FRAIL-NH量表评估虚弱(非虚弱0-2;虚弱3-6;最虚弱7-14)。卡方检验和患病率比(PR)用于比较队列中的STOPPFrail药物使用情况。
    结果:总计,84.7%的非脆弱,95.6%的脆弱,90.6%的最虚弱的居民接受了≥1次STOPPFrail药物治疗。总的来说,最普遍的STOPPFrail药物是抗高血压药(中国为53.0%,澳大利亚为73.3%,P≤.001),维生素D(中国为零,澳大利亚为52.7%,P≤.001),降脂治疗(日本为11.1%,澳大利亚为38.9%,P≤.001),阿司匹林(日本为13.5%,中国为26.2%,P≤.001),质子泵抑制剂(日本为2.1%,澳大利亚为32.0%,P≤.001),和抗糖尿病药物(日本为12.3%,中国为23.5%,P=.010)。整体使用抗高血压药(PR,1.15;95%CI,1.06-1.25),降脂疗法(PR,1.78;95%CI,1.45-2.18),阿司匹林(PR,1.31;95%CI,1.04-1.64),和抗糖尿病药物(PR,1.31;95%CI,1.00-1.72)在非虚弱和虚弱的居民中比大多数虚弱的居民更为普遍。在中国和日本,随着虚弱的增加,抗高血压的使用更加普遍。但随着澳大利亚日益脆弱,这种情况就不那么普遍了。在中国和西班牙,随着虚弱的增加,抗糖尿病药物的使用不那么普遍,但在澳大利亚和日本的虚弱群体中,抗糖尿病药物的使用是一致的。
    结论:不同STOPPFrail药物在不同队列中的患病率存在总体和脆弱的特异性差异。这可能反映了处方文化的差异,临床实践指南在疗养院环境中的应用,和临床医生或居民对开药的态度。
    OBJECTIVE: Deprescribing opportunities may differ across health care systems, nursing home settings, and prescribing cultures. The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of STOPPFrail medications according to frailty status among residents of nursing homes in Australia, China, Japan, and Spain.
    METHODS: Secondary cross-sectional analyses of data from 4 cohort studies.
    METHODS: A total of 1142 residents in 31 nursing homes.
    METHODS: Medication data were extracted from resident records. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL-NH scale (non-frail 0-2; frail 3-6; most-frail 7-14). Chi-square tests and prevalence ratios (PRs) were used to compare STOPPFrail medication use across cohorts.
    RESULTS: In total, 84.7% of non-frail, 95.6% of frail, and 90.6% of most-frail residents received ≥1 STOPPFrail medication. Overall, the most prevalent STOPPFrail medications were antihypertensives (53.0% in China to 73.3% in Australia, P < .001), vitamin D (nil in China to 52.7% in Australia, P < .001), lipid-lowering therapies (11.1% in Japan to 38.9% in Australia, P < .001), aspirin (13.5% in Japan to 26.2% in China, P < .001), proton pump inhibitors (2.1% in Japan to 32.0% in Australia, P < .001), and antidiabetic medications (12.3% in Japan to 23.5% in China, P = .010). Overall use of antihypertensives (PR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25), lipid-lowering therapies (PR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.45-2.18), aspirin (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.64), and antidiabetic medications (PR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.72) were more prevalent among non-frail and frail residents compared with most-frail residents. Antihypertensive use was more prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Japan, but less prevalent with increasing frailty in Australia. Antidiabetic medication use was less prevalent with increasing frailty in China and Spain but was consistent across frailty groups in Australia and Japan.
    CONCLUSIONS: There were overall and frailty-specific variations in prevalence of different STOPPFrail medications across cohorts. This may reflect differences in prescribing cultures, application of clinical practice guidelines in the nursing home setting, and clinician or resident attitudes toward deprescribing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的内在能力(IC)已被证明对个体的健康状况和健康轨迹具有最大的影响,并且可以独立预测老年人的死亡率和护理依赖性等不良后果。然而,目前对与IC相关的不良结局的理解是不完整的.方法对PubMed的文献进行范围审查,WebofScience(WOS),科克伦图书馆,CINAHL,和Embase数据库于2015年1月至2023年3月进行,以确定与老年人IC相关的不良结局相关的文章.结果711项研究符合筛选标准,25项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究报告了总共17个与IC相关的不良结局,涉及四个领域。(1)生理功能领域的不良结局包括虚弱,肺炎发作,记忆障碍,多药,失禁,和不良/公平的自我评价健康。(2)临床结果领域包括IADL残疾,ADL残疾,死亡率,falls,自主性下降,和事件依赖。(3)资源利用领域包括住院,疗养院住宿,多药房医疗保健成本,急诊部门的访问。(4)其他领域主要包括生活质量差。结论明显的是,老年人的IC下降与广泛的认知功能不良结局有关。活动能力,感官知觉,身心健康和生活水平。未来的研究应进一步深化集成电路的探索。
    Background and Purpose Intrinsic capacity (IC) has been shown to have the greatest impact on an individual\'s health status and health trajectory and can independently predict adverse outcomes such as mortality and care dependency in older adults. However, the current understanding of adverse outcomes associated with IC is incomplete. Methods A scoping review of the literature from PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted from January 2015 to March 2023 to identify articles related to the adverse outcomes associated with IC in older adults. Results 711 studies met screening criteria, and 25 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies reported a total of 17 adverse outcomes related to IC across four domains. (1) Adverse outcomes in the physiological function domains included frailty, pneumonia onset, memory impairment, polypharmacy, incontinence, and poor/fair self-rated health. (2) Clinical outcomes domains included IADL disability, ADL disability, mortality, falls, autonomy decline, and incident dependence. (3) The resource utilization domains included hospitalization, nursing home stays, polypharmacy healthcare costs, and emergency department visits. (4) The other domains mainly included poor quality of life. Conclusion It is evident that IC decline in older adults is associated with a broad spectrum of adverse outcomes spanning cognitive function, activity ability, sensory perception, physical and mental health and living standards. Future studies should further deepen the exploration of IC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中国老年人口的数量和比例一直在不断增加,导致慢性病和多发病的患病率上升,最终给社会和家庭带来沉重的负担。同时,老年住院患者的多发病状况往往比社区人群更为复杂.鉴于上述关注,本研究旨在通过分析中国人民解放军总医院2008年至2019年的临床资料,包括常见病的构成,调查老年住院患者的健康状况。合并症,多发病率的状况,老年住院患者的住院死亡和多重用药,从而更好地了解老年住院患者的疾病谱和多发病情况,为老年慢性病的针对性管理提供依据。
    方法:收集解放军总医院2008-2019年老年住院患者病历,建立临床住院患者数据库。重点研究老年住院患者的疾病谱和特点。在这项研究中,我们收集了年龄≥65岁的住院患者的数据,并进一步分析了疾病的构成,过去十年的多发病率和死亡率原因。此外,并对处方进行分析,调查老年住院患者的多药用药情况。
    结果:从1月1日起,共有210,169名老年患者住院,2008年至12月31日,2019.相应的住院人数为290,833。研究人群的平均年龄为72.67岁。在总人口中,一年内再次收治老年患者73493人,再住院率为25.27%。恶性肿瘤,高血压,缺血性心脏病,糖尿病和脑血管疾病是前5位疾病。在研究人群中,患有两种或两种以上长期健康状况的患者为267,259例,占91.89%,平均4.68种疾病。此外,研究人群平均服用的药物数量为5.4,其中,服用5种以上药物的患者比例为55.42%。
    结论:通过分析疾病和多发病的构成,我们发现多发病已经成为老年住院患者的一个突出问题,影响健康老龄化进程,增加家庭和社会负担。因此,加强多学科综合治疗,制定合理的防治策略,提高老年人的生活质量。同时,老年多病患者应注意合理用药,避免因不合理用药而引起的副作用。
    BACKGROUND: The number and proportion of the elderly population have been continuously increasing in China, leading to the elevated prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity, which ultimately brings heavy burden to society and families. Meanwhile, the status of multimorbidity tends to be more complex in elderly inpatients than community population. In view of the above concerns, this study was designed to investigate the health status of elderly inpatients by analyzing clinical data in Chinese People\'s Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital from 2008 to 2019, including the constitution of common diseases, comorbidities, the status of multimorbidity, in-hospital death and polypharmacy among elderly inpatients, so as to better understand the diseases spectrum and multimorbidity of elderly inpatients and also to provide supporting evidence for targeted management of chronic diseases in the elderly.
    METHODS: A clinical inpatients database was set up by collecting medical records of elderly inpatients from 2008 to 2019 in Chinese PLA General Hospital, focusing on diseases spectrum and characteristics of elderly inpatients. In this study, we collected data of inpatients aged ≥ 65 years old, and further analyzed the constitution of diseases, multimorbidity rates and mortality causes in the past decade. In addition, the prescriptions were also analyzed to investigate the status of polypharmacy in elderly inpatients.
    RESULTS: A total of 210,169 elderly patients were hospitalized from January 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2019. The corresponding number of hospitalizations was 290,833. The average age of the study population was 72.67 years old. Of the total population, 73,493 elderly patients were re-admitted within one year, with the re-hospitalization rate of 25.27%. Malignant tumor, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular disease were the top 5 diseases. Among the study population, the number of patients with two or more long-term health conditions was 267,259, accounting for 91.89%, with an average of 4.68 diseases. In addition, the average number of medications taken by the study population was 5.4, among which, the proportion of patients taking more than 5 types of medications accounted for 55.42%.
    CONCLUSIONS: By analyzing the constitution of diseases and multimorbidity, we found that multimorbidity has turned out to be a prominent problem in elderly inpatients, greatly affecting the process of healthy aging and increasing the burden on families and society. Therefore, multidisciplinary treatment should be strengthened to make reasonable preventive and therapeutic strategies to improve the life quality of the elderly. Meanwhile, more attention should be paid to reasonable medications for elderly patients with multimorbidity to avoid preventable side effects caused by irrational medication therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号