BACKGROUND: Lower limb artery disease (LEAD) is accompanied by multiple comorbidities; however, the effect of hyperpolypharmacy on patients with LEAD has not been established. This study investigated the associations between hyperpolypharmacy, medication class, and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with LEAD.
METHODS: This study used data from a prospective multicenter observational Japanese registry. A total of 366 patients who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) for LEAD were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause death.
RESULTS: Of 366 patients with LEAD, 12 with missing medication information were excluded. Of the 354 remaining patients, 166 had hyperpolypharmacy (≥10 medications, 46.9 %), 162 had polypharmacy (5-9 medications, 45.8 %), and 26 had nonpolypharmacy (<5 medications, 7.3 %). Over a 4.7-year median follow-up period, patients in the hyperpolypharmacy group showed worse outcomes than those in the other two groups (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the total number of medications was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE (hazard ratio per medication increase 1.078, 95 % confidence interval 1.02-1.13 p = 0.012). Although an increased number of non-cardiovascular medications was associated with an elevated risk of MACE, the increase in cardiovascular medications was not statistically significant (log-rank test, p = 0.002 and 0.35, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Hyperpolypharmacy due to non-cardiovascular medications was significantly associated with adverse outcomes in patients with LEAD who underwent EVT, suggesting the importance of medication reviews, including non-cardiovascular medications.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic disease that often requires medication for control. Polypharmacy remains a major issue to medication adherence; however, its evidence among patients with asthma is limited.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence and determinants of polypharmacy and its associations with asthma control among adults with asthma in the United States.
METHODS: Data from the 2005-2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used to estimate the weighted prevalence of polypharmacy. Selected variables, including demographics, comorbidities, prescription medications, and asthma-related adverse events, were extracted from the NHANES. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to identify factors associated with polypharmacy. Another two sets of multivariable logistic regression models were employed to further assess the association between polypharmacy and asthma-related adverse events: one for asthma attacks and the other for asthma-related emergency room visits.
RESULTS: From 2005 to 2020, polypharmacy prevalence was 34.3% and 14.1% among adults with and without asthma, respectively. Characteristics, including older age (P<0.01), non-Hispanic blacks (P<0.01), health insurance coverage (P<0.01), number of healthcare visits (P<0.01), and multiple comorbidities (P<0.01) were associated with polypharmacy. Polypharmacy was associated with increased risks of having asthma attacks (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.08-1.76) and asthma-related emergency room visits (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94) among adults with asthma. Among patients taking at least one asthma medication, risks of asthma attacks and asthma-related ER visits did not differ between those with and without polypharmacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one in three adults with asthma experienced polypharmacy in the United States. Disparities existed in several characteristics, highlighting the necessity for appropriate care and policies among vulnerable populations. Further validation on the impact of polypharmacy on asthma control is required.

As the Japanese population continues to age steadily, the number of older adults requiring healthcare has increased. Evidence demonstrates that hospitalization for acute care has a negative impact on the health outcomes of older adults. Frail older adults tend to have multifactorial conditions collectively known as \"geriatric syndromes.\" When those with these premorbid conditions are hospitalized for acute care, they tend to develop new problems such as delirium and new functional impairments. Adverse consequences of hospitalization include the risk of loss of functional independence and chronic disability. In 2019, the new concept of \"hospital-associated complications\" (HACs) was proposed to describe these new problems. HACs comprise five conditions: hospital-associated falls, delirium, functional decline, incontinence, and pressure injuries. This review discusses the important issues of HACs in relation to their classification, prevalence, risk factors, prevention, and management in older adults hospitalized for acute care. Robust prevention and management are imperative to address the serious consequences and escalating medical costs associated with HACs, and a multidimensional and multidisciplinary approach is key to achieving this goal. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is the cornerstone of geriatric medicine and offers a holistic approach involving multidisciplinary and multidimensional assessments. Considerable evidence is accumulating regarding how CGA and coordinated care can improve the prognosis of hospitalized older adults. Further research is needed to understand the occurrence of HACs in this population and to develop effective preventive measures.

Antihypertensive drugs are commonly used by older adults because of the high prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors, and the increased absolute benefit of blood pressure reduction with increasing age. Clinical trials of blood pressure reduction in older adults have generally excluded older adults with multimorbidity, frailty and limited life expectancy. In this population, the benefit-harm ratio of aggressive blood pressure lowering may become unfavourable; a more relaxed blood pressure target may be appropriate; and deprescribing (cessation or dose reduction) of one or more antihypertensive drugs can be considered. Before deprescribing an antihypertensive drug, it is important to consider other indications for which it may have been prescribed (e.g. heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, diabetic nephropathy, atrial fibrillation). Evidence from randomised controlled deprescribing trials indicates that it is possible to deprescribe antihypertensives in frail older people. However, some patients may experience an increase in blood pressure that warrants restarting the drug. There are limited data on long-term outcomes (follow-up in deprescribing trials ranged from 4 to 56 weeks). The risk of adverse outcomes associated with deprescribing, such as withdrawal effects, can be minimised through appropriate planning, patient engagement, dose tapering and monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is important in heart failure management; however, polypharmacy itself may impact heart failure. Although measures against polypharmacy are needed, current discussion on unilateral drug tapering (including the drugs that should be tapered) is insufficient. In this study, we investigated the relationship between the number of prescribed GDMT drugs and prognosis in patients with heart failure.
METHODS: In this single-centre retrospective study, 3,146 eligible patients with heart failure were included and divided into four groups based on the median number of prescribed GDMT drugs and the median number of drugs not included in the GDMT (ni-GDMT) at the time of hospital discharge. The definition of GDMT was based on various Japanese guidelines. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 3 years of hospital discharge.
RESULTS: A total of 252 deaths were observed during the 3-year follow-up period. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that groups with GDMT drug count ≥ 5 and ni-GDMT drug count < 4 had the lowest mortality, and those with GDMT drug count < 5 and ni-GDMT drug count ≥ 4 had the highest mortality (log-rank, P < 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed a significant association between ni-GDMT drug count and all-cause mortality, even after adjustment for number of GDMT medications, age, male, left ventricular ejection function < 40%, hemoglobin, albumin levels, and estimated glomerular filtration rate [HR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01-1.11), P = 0.020]. Conversely, the GDMT drug count was not associated with increased mortality rates.
CONCLUSIONS: The ni-GDMT drug count was significantly associated with 3-year mortality in patients with heart failure. Conversely, the GDMT drug count did not worsen the prognosis. Polypharmacy measures should consider ni-GDMT drug quantity to improve the prognosis and outcomes in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is usually associated with a higher risk of adverse health outcomes. It is therefore important to identify PIP in older adults. However, there are no clear prioritisation strategies to select patients requiring prescription reviews.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the association between the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) score and the number of PIPs.
METHODS: A 12-month retrospective hospital-based study was conducted. PIPs, including potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs), were detected using the STOPP/START tool. Multivariate linear regressions were conducted to identify factors associated with the number of PIPs. Sensitivity, specificity, Youden index, and ROC curve were calculated to determine the predictive power of ISAR score.
RESULTS: This study included 266 records. The analysis led to the detection of 420 PIMs and 210 PPOs, with a prevalence of 80.1% and 54.9%, respectively. Multivariate linear regression revealed that the ISAR score (p = 0.041), and the number of medications (p < 0.001) were determinants of PIP. The number of medications remained the sole determinant of the number of PIMs (p < 0.001), while living in a nursing home was the only determinant of the number of PPOs (p = 0.036).
CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the ISAR score and the number of medications were independently associated with the number of PIPs. Considering the use of the ISAR score and the number of medications may be useful strategies to prioritise patients for whom prescribing appropriateness should be assessed using explicit criteria.

UNASSIGNED: Muscle weakness in older adults elevates mortality risk and impairs quality of life, with the phase angle (PhA) indicating cellular health. Polypharmacy, common in geriatric care, could influence PhA. This investigates whether the number of medications and polypharmacy with PhA as a biomarker of muscle quality in older inpatients aged ≧ 65 and determines the extent to which multiple medications contribute to the risk of reduced muscle quality.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed data from older inpatients requiring rehabilitation. PhA was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. The number of medications taken by each patient was recorded at admission. Polypharmacy was defined as the concurrent use of five or more medications at admission.
UNASSIGNED: In this study of 517 hospitalized older adults (median age: 75 years; 47.4% men), 178 patients (34.4%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. Polypharmacy was present in 66% of patients. The median PhA was 4.9° in men and 4.3° in women. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed separately for men and women. In men, PhA was negatively correlated with the number of medications (β = -0.104, p=0.041) and polypharmacy (β = -0.045, p=0.383). In women, PhA was negatively correlated with the number of medications (β = -0.119, p=0.026) and polypharmacy (β = -0.098, p=0.063). Analyses were adjusted for age, BMI, sarcopenia, CRP, and hemoglobin levels.
UNASSIGNED: The number of medications at admission negatively impacted PhA in older inpatients, highlighting the importance of reviewing prescribed drugs and their interactions.

BACKGROUND: There has been significant investment in pharmacists working in UK general practice to improve the effective and safe use of medicines. However, evidence of how to optimise collaboration between GPs and pharmacists in the context of polypharmacy (multiple medication) is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To explore GP and pharmacist views and experiences of in-person, inter-professional collaborative discussions (IPCDs) as part of a complex intervention to optimise medication use for patients with polypharmacy in general practice.
METHODS: A mixed-method process evaluation embedded within the Improving Medicines use in People with Polypharmacy in Primary Care (IMPPP) trial conducted in Bristol and the West Midlands.
METHODS: Audio-recordings of IPCDs between GPs and pharmacists, and individual semi-structured interviews exploring their reflections on these discussions. All recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically.
RESULTS: Fourteen practices took part in the process evaluation (Feb 2021- Sept 2023). Seventeen IPCD meetings were audio recorded discussing 30 patients (range of 1-6 patients per meeting). Six GPs and 13 pharmacists were interviewed. The IPCD was highly valued by GPs and pharmacists who described benefits including: strengthening their working relationship; learning from each other; and gaining in confidence to manage more complex patients. It was often challenging, however, to find time for the IPCDs.
CONCLUSIONS: The model of IPCD studied provided protected time for GPs and pharmacists to work together to deliver whole-patient care, with both professions finding this beneficial. Protected time for inter-professional liaison and collaboration, and structured interventions may facilitate improved patient care.

Background: Individuals with disabilities may require specific medications in pregnancy. The prevalence and patterns of medication use, overall and for medications with known teratogenic risks, are largely unknown. Methods: This population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, 2004-2021, comprised all recognized pregnancies among individuals eligible for public drug plan coverage. Included were those with a physical (n = 44,136), sensory (n = 13,633), intellectual or developmental (n = 2,446) disability, or multiple disabilities (n = 5,064), compared with those without a disability (n = 299,944). Prescription medication use in pregnancy, overall and by type, was described. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (aRR) for the use of medications with known teratogenic risks and use of ≥2 and ≥5 medications concurrently in pregnancy, comparing those with versus without a disability, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Results: Medication use in pregnancy was more common in people with intellectual or developmental (82.1%), multiple (80.4%), physical (73.9%), and sensory (71.9%) disabilities, than in those with no known disability (67.4%). Compared with those without a disability (5.7%), teratogenic medication use in pregnancy was especially higher in people with multiple disabilities (14.2%; aRR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-2.20). Furthermore, compared with people without a disability (3.2%), the use of ≥5 medications concurrently was more common in those with multiple disabilities (13.4%; aRR 2.21, 95% CI: 2.02-2.41) and an intellectual or developmental disability (9.3%; aRR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.86-2.45). Interpretation: Among people with disabilities, medication use in pregnancy is prevalent, especially for potentially teratogenic medications and polypharmacy, highlighting the need for preconception counseling/monitoring to reduce medication-related harm in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have a central role to play on reduction of polypharmacy and deprescribing. This study aimed to assess beliefs and attitudes towards deprescribing in patients, aged 65 years or older in primary care, and to identify factors associated with deprescribing and their willingness to stop medication.
METHODS: A questionnaire study was performed between 23 May and 29 July 2022 on patients aged 65 years or older attending a GP\'s surgery in a French area. We used the French version of the revised Patients\' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing self-report questionnaire (rPATD), which measures four subscales (\"Burden\", \"Appropriateness\", \"Concerns about stopping\" and, \"Involvement\"), patients\' willingness to stop one of their regular medicines, and patients\' satisfaction with their current medicines.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 200 patients. Median age was 76 years old (IQR 71-81), 55% were women, and 42.5% took 5 or more medications per day. Although most patients (92.5%) were satisfied with their current medicines, 35% were reluctant to stop medications they had been taking for a long time, and 89.5% were willing to stop medication if asked to by their GP. Patients aged less than 75 years old reported more concerns about stopping. Women and patients with higher educational attainment showed significantly higher involvement in medication management.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of older adults were willing to stop one or more of their regular medicines if asked to do so by their GP. GPs should address deprescribing into their current practice.