背景:久坐行为(SB)在社区居住的2型糖尿病(T2DM)老年人的日常生活中根深蒂固。然而,与SB相关的决定因素的具体潜在机制仍然难以捉摸。我们旨在基于行为变化轮框架以及文献综述来探索SB的决定因素。
方法:这项横断面研究招募了济南市489名社区居住的T2DM老年人,山东省,中国。使用便利抽样从相关社区中选择参与者。这项研究使用了老年人久坐时间-T2DM的测量,缩写-邻里环境可步行性量表,社会支持评定量表,鲁本社会网络量表6,久坐行为主观社会规范问卷,功能活动问卷,数值评级量表,短物理性能电池,和蒙特利尔认知评估文本来评估SB的水平和决定因素。进行描述性统计分析和路径分析以分析和解释数据。
结果:疼痛,认知功能,社会孤立,和社会支持对社区居住的T2DM老年人的SB有直接和间接影响(总影响分别为:β=0.426,β=-0.171,β=-0.209和β=-0.128),和身体功能,行走环境,和社会功能对患者SB有直接影响(总影响:β=-0.180,β=-0.163和β=0.127)。上述通路均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。路径分析显示,模型拟合指数RMSEA=0.014,χ2/df=1.100,GFI=0.999,AGFI=0.980,NFI=0.997,RFI=0.954,FI=1.000,TLI=0.996,CFI=1.000。
结论:能力(身体机能,疼痛,和认知功能),机会(社会孤立,行走环境,和社会支持),动机(社会功能)是社区居住的T2DM老年人SB的有效预测因子。关于这些关联的更深入的知识可以帮助医疗保健提供者设计有针对性的干预策略,以降低该特定人群中的SB水平。
BACKGROUND: Sedentary behavior (SB) is deeply ingrained in the daily lives of
community-dwelling older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the specific underlying mechanisms of the determinants associated with SB remain elusive. We aimed to explore the determinants of SB based on the behavior change wheel framework as well as a literature review.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 489
community-dwelling older adults with T2DM in Jinan City, Shandong Province,
China. Convenience sampling was used to select participants from relevant communities. This study used the Measure of Older Adults\' Sedentary Time-T2DM, the Abbreviated-Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale, the Social Support Rating Scale, the Lubben Social Network Scale 6, the Subjective Social Norms Questionnaire for Sedentary Behavior, the Functional Activities Questionnaire, the Numerical Rating Scale, the Short Physical Performance Battery, and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Text to assess the levels of and the determinants of SB. Descriptive statistical analysis and path analysis were conducted to analyze and interpret the data.
RESULTS: Pain, cognitive function, social isolation, and social support had direct and indirect effects on SB in
community-dwelling older adults with T2DM (total effects: β = 0.426, β = -0.171, β = -0.209, and β = -0.128, respectively), and physical function, walking environment, and social function had direct effects on patients\' SB (total effects: β = -0.180, β = -0.163, and β = 0.127, respectively). All the above pathways were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The path analysis showed that the model had acceptable fit indices: RMSEA = 0.014, χ 2/df = 1.100, GFI = 0.999, AGFI = 0.980, NFI = 0.997, RFI = 0.954, IFI = 1.000, TLI = 0.996, CFI = 1.000.
CONCLUSIONS: Capability (physical function, pain, and cognitive function), opportunity (social isolation, walking environment, and social support), and motivation (social function) were effective predictors of SB in
community-dwelling older adults with T2DM. Deeper knowledge regarding these associations may help healthcare providers design targeted intervention strategies to decrease levels of SB in this specific population.