Community

社区
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过达成共识声明,为有效的社区药房丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)检测服务制定蓝图。
    方法:这是一个改进的Delphi过程。
    方法:我们通过有目的和连锁转诊方法招募了一个异质专家小组(参与了社区药房HCV检测服务的设置或交付)。我们进行了三轮修改的Delphi过程。首先是一系列带有自由文本回答的问题,并使用主题分析进行了分析,第二个和第三个是受访者使用7分Likert量表进行评分的陈述。共识是在已发布的协议中预定义的,结果在声明定稿前由公众和患者参与小组审查.
    结果:我们有24名参与者,包括社区和医院的药剂师,当地药物委员会成员,慈善代表(丙型肝炎信托),当地临床服务负责人,护士专家和医生。第一个的反应率,第二轮和第三轮是100%,96%和88%,分别。第三轮之后,我们有60份声明达成共识。我们与患者和公众参与小组讨论了公认的陈述。我们使用这些语句来生成I-COPTIC语句和图形摘要。
    结论:我们为黄金标准社区药房HCV检测服务的设计制定了蓝图。我们相信这将支持成功实施社区药房HCV检测。社区药房检测是帮助实现和维持HCV消除的重要服务。
    OBJECTIVE: This aimed to develop a blueprint for an effective community pharmacy Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing service by producing a consensus statement.
    METHODS: This was a modified Delphi process.
    METHODS: We recruited a heterogenous panel of experts (who had been involved in the setup or delivery of a community pharmacy HCV testing service) by purposive and chain referral methods. We had three rounds of a modified Delphi process. The first was a series of questions with free text responses and was analysed using thematic analysis, and the second and third were statements for the respondents to rate using a 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was predefined in a published protocol, and the results were reviewed by a public and patient involvement panel before the statement was finalised.
    RESULTS: We had 24 participants, including community and hospital-based pharmacists, local pharmaceutical committee members, charity representatives (Hepatitis C Trust), local clinical service lead, nurse specialists and doctors. The response rate of the first, second and third rounds were 100%, 96% and 88%, respectively. After the third round, we had 60 statements that reached consensus. We discussed the accepted statements with a patient and public involvement group. We used these statements to produce the I-COPTIC statement and a graphical summary.
    CONCLUSIONS: We developed a blueprint for the design of a gold standard community pharmacy HCV testing service. We believe this will support the successful implementation of community pharmacy testing for HCV. Community pharmacy testing is an important service to help achieve and maintain HCV elimination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    老年人营养不良会降低生活质量,增加发病率和死亡率的风险。准确和及时地识别营养不良以及随后实施有效的干预措施对于减少老年人营养不良相关的不良后果至关重要。营养与饮食学会证据分析中心对文献进行了系统回顾,以制定预防和治疗老年人营养不良(MiOA)的循证实践指南。本指南的目的是提供基于证据的建议,防止,或治疗在长期护理和社区环境中生活的老年人(平均年龄≥65岁)的蛋白质能量营养不良。该指南提供了11项营养建议,以告知营养师之间的共同决策,医疗团队的成员,家庭成员或看护人,以及居住在LTC或社区的老年人,以预防或治疗营养不良。主题包括营养师的有效性,营养评估工具,口服营养补充剂,食物强化,在家送餐和聚餐。指南的实施应包括考虑对老年人进行全面个性化营养护理的重要性。未来的研究需要解决与有效性相关的差距,可靠性,营养评估工具的可行性以及营养师干预对生活在LTC和社区的老年人的兴趣结果的有效性。
    Malnutrition in older adults can decrease quality of life and increase risk of morbidities and mortality. Accurate and timely identification of malnutrition, as well as subsequent implementation of effective interventions, are essential to decrease poor outcomes associated with malnutrition in older adults. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Center conducted a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based nutrition practice guideline for the prevention and treatment of malnutrition in older adults. The objective of this guideline was to provide evidence-based recommendations to identify, prevent, or treat protein-energy malnutrition in older adults (mean age ≥65 years) living in long-term care and community settings. This guideline provides 11 nutrition recommendations to inform shared decision making among dietitians, members of the health care team, family members or caregivers, and older adults living in long-term care or the community to prevent or treat malnutrition. Topics include dietitian effectiveness, nutrition assessment tools, oral nutrition supplements, food fortification, and home-delivered and congregate meals. Guideline implementation should include consideration of the importance of comprehensive individualized nutrition care for older adults. Future research is needed to address gaps that were identified related to the validity, reliability, and feasibility of nutrition assessment tools, as well as the effectiveness of dietitian interventions on outcomes of interest in older adults living in long-term care and the community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在微真核生物中,遗传变异和功能变异有时比形态差异积累得更快。为了了解这些谱系的进化史和生态学,关键是检查组织多个层面的多样性。在鞭毛藻科共生菌科中,可以与刺胞动物形成内共生(例如,珊瑚,八角珊瑚,海葵,水母),其他海洋无脊椎动物(例如,海绵,软体动物,扁虫),和原生生物(例如,有孔虫),在过去的三十年中,分子数据已被广泛用于描述表型并做出进化和生态推断。尽管在共生子科基因组学方面取得了进展,研究人员在解释遗传数据方面缺乏共识,这减缓了该领域的进展,并成为调和观察结果的障碍。这里,我们确定了在三个层面上评估和解释共生菌科遗传多样性的关键挑战:物种,人口,和社区。我们总结了协议的领域,并强调了被广泛接受的技术和方法。在仍有争论的领域,我们确定了尚未解决的问题,并讨论了可以帮助填补与遗传和表型多样性相关的知识空白的技术和方法。我们还讨论了刺激进步的方法,特别是通过培养一个更具包容性和协作性的研究社区。我们希望这种观点将通过作为设计实验的资源来激发和加速珊瑚礁科学,出版研究,并申请与共生科及其共生伙伴关系有关的资金。
    Within microeukaryotes, genetic variation and functional variation sometimes accumulate more quickly than morphological differences. To understand the evolutionary history and ecology of such lineages, it is key to examine diversity at multiple levels of organization. In the dinoflagellate family Symbiodiniaceae, which can form endosymbioses with cnidarians (e.g., corals, octocorals, sea anemones, jellyfish), other marine invertebrates (e.g., sponges, molluscs, flatworms), and protists (e.g., foraminifera), molecular data have been used extensively over the past three decades to describe phenotypes and to make evolutionary and ecological inferences. Despite advances in Symbiodiniaceae genomics, a lack of consensus among researchers with respect to interpreting genetic data has slowed progress in the field and acted as a barrier to reconciling observations. Here, we identify key challenges regarding the assessment and interpretation of Symbiodiniaceae genetic diversity across three levels: species, populations, and communities. We summarize areas of agreement and highlight techniques and approaches that are broadly accepted. In areas where debate remains, we identify unresolved issues and discuss technologies and approaches that can help to fill knowledge gaps related to genetic and phenotypic diversity. We also discuss ways to stimulate progress, in particular by fostering a more inclusive and collaborative research community. We hope that this perspective will inspire and accelerate coral reef science by serving as a resource to those designing experiments, publishing research, and applying for funding related to Symbiodiniaceae and their symbiotic partnerships.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:提供临床指南的智能手机应用程序等移动健康平台无处不在,然而,它们对指南依从性的长期影响尚不清楚.2016年,抗生素指南应用程序,叫做SCRIPT,是在奥克兰市医院介绍的,新西兰,在智能手机上向临床医生提供当地抗生素指南。
    目的:我们旨在评估在智能手机应用中提供抗生素指南是否导致处方者对抗生素指南依从性的持续改变。
    方法:我们使用中断的时间序列研究分析了被诊断患有社区获得性肺炎的成年人在入院的前24小时内的抗生素指南依从率(即,3、12和24个月)。
    结果:依从性从基线时的23%(46/200)增加到3个月时的31%(73/237)和12个月时的34%(69/200),在应用实施后24个月减少到31%(62/200)(P=.07与基线相比)。然而,在X线检查时,肺实变患者的依从性持续增加(基线时9/63,14%;3个月后23/77,30%;12个月后32/92,35%;24个月后32/102,31%;与基线相比P=.04).
    结论:抗生素指南应用程序提高了总体依从性,但这并没有持续下去。在肺实变患者中,坚持的增加是持续的。
    Mobile health platforms like smartphone apps that provide clinical guidelines are ubiquitous, yet their long-term impact on guideline adherence remains unclear. In 2016, an antibiotic guidelines app, called SCRIPT, was introduced in Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand, to provide local antibiotic guidelines to clinicians on their smartphones.
    We aimed to assess whether the provision of antibiotic guidelines in a smartphone app resulted in sustained changes in antibiotic guideline adherence by prescribers.
    We analyzed antibiotic guideline adherence rates during the first 24 hours of hospital admission in adults diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia using an interrupted time-series study with 3 distinct periods post app implementation (ie, 3, 12, and 24 months).
    Adherence increased from 23% (46/200) at baseline to 31% (73/237) at 3 months and 34% (69/200) at 12 months, reducing to 31% (62/200) at 24 months post app implementation (P=.07 vs baseline). However, increased adherence was sustained in patients with pulmonary consolidation on x-ray (9/63, 14% at baseline; 23/77, 30% after 3 months; 32/92, 35% after 12 month; and 32/102, 31% after 24 months; P=.04 vs baseline).
    An antibiotic guidelines app increased overall adherence, but this was not sustained. In patients with pulmonary consolidation, the increased adherence was sustained.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2020年国家哮喘教育和预防计划(NAEPP)更新和2021年全球哮喘倡议(GINA)的最新建议指导了基于证据的临床决策。然而,考虑到目前按年龄划分的健康状况,收入,和种族,没有进一步的指导,这些准则的公平执行和传播将是不可能的。该工作组报告回顾了新哮喘指南实施的现状,提供更新的循证治疗方案,关注特定患者人群,并解决了实施这些指导方针的障碍,边缘化,资源不足的社区。变态反应学家和免疫学家可以利用实用的方法来实现在整个生命周期中改善哮喘护理和高级哮喘护理的目标。对历史边缘化人群的具体考虑。指南实施的可修改障碍包括财务障碍,环境因素,以及过敏亚专科的准入和护理协调。改善基于指南的哮喘护理的各种计划包括社区计划,以学校为基础的哮喘项目,和数字健康解决方案,强调缩小种族差距。
    The most recent recommendations from the 2020 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Update and Global Initiative for Asthma 2021 guide evidence-based clinical decision making. However, given the present state of health disparities by age, income, and race, the equitable implementation and dissemination of these guidelines will be unlikely without further guidance. This work group report reviews the current state of the new asthma guideline implementation; presents updated evidence-based therapeutic options with attention to specific patient populations; and addresses barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in minoritized, historically marginalized, and underresourced communities. Allergists and immunologists can use practical ways to accomplish the goals of improved asthma care access and advanced asthma care across the life span, with specific considerations to historically marginalized populations. Modifiable barriers to guideline implementation include financial barriers, environmental factors, and allergy subspecialty access and care coordination. Various programs to improve access to guideline-based asthma care include community programs, school-based asthma programs, and digital health solutions, with an emphasis on reducing disparities by race.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有组织的运动是参与运动的最常见设置。尽管参与有一系列有案可查的好处,这些积极的结果并不总是得到保证。压力和伤害造成的情绪困扰可能意味着一些参与者会经历负面结果。为确保有组织的运动设施良好,以促进其成员的心理健康,他们需要基于证据的指导方针。使用基于社区的参与式研究框架,将制定社区体育心理健康指南。在第一阶段,社区体育利益相关者将参与焦点小组。目的是了解自己对内容的喜好,准则的目的和范围。在第二阶段,一项e-Delphi研究将与澳大利亚心理健康和体育专家一起进行,以收集有关指南目的和范围的建议。在第三阶段,将与专家准则发展委员会举行一次全国共识会议,以起草准则。第四阶段,后续焦点小组将与社区体育利益相关者举行,以了解准则草案的可用性和可接受性。在第五阶段,在社区利益相关者审查后,将进行第二次e-Delphi研究,以对修订后的指南提供反馈。在第六阶段,实施案例研究将评估社区体育俱乐部实施准则的情况。这些心理健康指南将回应专家的紧急行动呼吁。准则将根据部门需求和偏好,可以接受和使用,并能够在2025年之前由全球社区体育俱乐部实施。
    Organised sports are the most common settings for sports participation. Despite a range of documented benefits from participation, these positive outcomes are not always guaranteed. Emotional distress from pressure and injuries can mean some participants experience negative outcomes. To ensure organised sports are well equipped to promote the mental health of their members, evidence-based guidelines for them are required. Using a Community-Based Participatory Research framework, mental health guidelines for community sport will be developed. In Phase One, community sport stakeholders will participate in focus groups. The aim is to understand their preferences of the content, purpose and scope of the guidelines. In Phase Two, an e-Delphi study will be conducted with experts in mental health and sport in Australia to gather recommendations on the purpose and scope of the guidelines. In Phase Three, a national consensus meeting with an Expert Guideline Development Committee will be held to draft the guidelines. In Phase Four, follow-up focus groups will be held with community sport stakeholders to understand the usability and acceptability of the draft guidelines. In Phase Five, a second e-Delphi study will be conducted to provide feedback on the revised guidelines after community stakeholder review. In Phase Six, implementation case studies will assess the implementation of the guidelines in community sport clubs. These mental health guidelines will answer an urgent call for action by experts. The guidelines will be based on sector needs and preferences, be acceptable and useable, and be able to be implemented by community sport clubs globally by 2025.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一般肌肉健康随着年龄的增长而下降,特别是,肌少症-定义为肌肉质量和力量/身体表现的进行性丧失-在亚洲是一个日益严重的问题,社区居住的老年人人口不断增加。一些指南已经解决了肌肉减少症的早期识别和管理,尽管营养是治疗少肌症的核心,目前很少有专门针对亚洲人群的指南对此进行检查。因此,亚洲肌肉减少症工作组成立了一个特别兴趣小组(SIG),由亚洲的七名专家和澳大利亚的一名专家组成,形成以证据为基础的专家共识。使用MEDLINE对肌肉健康这一主题进行了系统的文献检索,从2016年(含)到2021年7月,在亚洲或与健康相关,亚洲社区居住的老年人(≥60岁)。确定了几个关键主题:(1)营养状况:营养不良和筛查;(2)饮食和饮食因素;(3)营养补充;(4)生活方式干预加营养;(5)结果和评估。围绕这些主题开发了临床问题,达成14项共识。通过两轮投票,使用改进的德尔菲法取得了共识。此外,共识解决了COVID-19对营养的影响,肌肉健康,和亚洲的肌少症。这些陈述涵盖了亚洲各地的临床专业知识和知识,并与当前文献中的发现保持一致。为解决社区肌肉健康提供一个实用的框架,总体目标是鼓励和促进更广泛地获得这一目标人群的公平护理。
    General muscle health declines with age, and in particular, sarcopenia-defined as progressive loss of muscle mass and strength/physical performance-is a growing issue in Asia with a rising population of community-dwelling older adults. Several guidelines have addressed early identification of sarcopenia and management, and although nutrition is central to treatment of sarcopenia, there are currently few guidelines that have examined this specifically in the Asian population. Therefore, the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia established a special interest group (SIG) comprising seven experts across Asia and one from Australia, to develop an evidence-based expert consensus. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE on the topic of muscle health, from 2016 (inclusive) to July 2021, in Asia or with relevance to healthy, Asian community-dwelling older adults (≥60 years old). Several key topics were identified: (1) nutritional status: malnutrition and screening; (2) diet and dietary factors; (3) nutritional supplementation; (4) lifestyle interventions plus nutrition; and (5) outcomes and assessment. Clinical questions were developed around these topics, leading to 14 consensus statements. Consensus was achieved using the modified Delphi method with two rounds of voting. Moreover, the consensus addressed the impacts of COVID-19 on nutrition, muscle health, and sarcopenia in Asia. These statements encompass clinical expertise and knowledge across Asia and are aligned with findings in the current literature, to provide a practical framework for addressing muscle health in the community, with the overall aim to encourage and facilitate broader access to equitable care for this target population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管社区参与艾滋病毒研究具有广泛公认的道德和实践利益,认知不公正在该领域内持续存在。即,受艾滋病毒不成比例影响的社区所掌握的知识在系统上的可信度低于更有特权的学术研究人员。为了说明这在实践中是什么样子,我们在最近的高影响力HIV干预研究论文中综合了社区参与报告的程度.然而,我们还认为,艾滋病毒研究部门有潜力设计和展示公平的研究社区伙伴关系的世界领先实例,并提出实现这一目标的可行关键步骤。
    在发布过程中没有报告要求的情况下,很难推断在设计中是否以及如何咨询社区,实施,分析和/或解释结果。作为一个说明性的练习,我们对2017年至2019年社区参与艾滋病毒研究的报告程度进行了快速综合,其中突出了近期高影响力艾滋病毒干预研究中社区参与报告的零星和非常低的比率.值得注意的是,没有一项纳入的研究报告了研究过程的所有阶段的社区参与。报告社区参与的方式也存在差异。我们提供了三个可行的建议,以加强社区参与艾滋病毒研究的报告:(1)社区主导的组织,研究人员和科技期刊应该联合起来发展,(2)研究资助者应(继续)在提交资助申请之前,详细说明相关社区的参与情况;(3)研究人员应采取积极措施,以明确和透明的方式描述他们与社区组织的参与情况。
    有一个明确的和迫切的需要的指导方针,以促进透明和一致的报告社区参与艾滋病毒干预研究。研究部门没有标准化的报告要求和问责机制,有意义的社区参与的程度无法确定,可能仍然是一个口号,而不是现实。
    Despite the widely recognized ethical and practical benefits of community engagement in HIV research, epistemic injustice persists within the field. Namely, the knowledge held by communities disproportionately affected by HIV is systematically afforded less credibility than that of more privileged academic researchers. In order to illustrate what this looks like in practice, we synthesized the extent of reporting on community engagement within recent high-impact HIV intervention research papers. However, we also posit that the HIV research sector has the potential to devise and showcase world-leading examples of equitable research-community partnerships and suggest actionable key steps to achieving this goal.
    In the absence of reporting requirements within the publishing process, it is difficult to infer whether and how the community have been consulted in the design, implementation, analysis and/or interpretation of findings. As an illustrative exercise, we offer a rapid synthesis of the extent of reporting on community engagement in HIV research from 2017 to 2019, which highlighted sporadic and very low rates of reporting of community engagement in recent high-impact HIV intervention studies. Of note is that none of the included studies reported on community engagement through all stages of the research process. There were also discrepancies in how community involvement was reported. We provide three actionable recommendations to enhance reporting on community engagement in HIV research: (1) community-led organizations, researchers and scientific journals should band together to develop, publish and require adherence to standardized guidelines for reporting on community involvement in HIV research; (2) research funders should (continue to) require details about how relevant communities have been engaged prior to the submission of funding requests; and (3) researchers should take proactive measures to describe their engagement with community organizations in a clear and transparent manner.
    There is a clear and urgent need for guidelines that facilitate transparent and consistent reporting on community engagement in HIV intervention research. Without standardized reporting requirements and accountability mechanisms within the research sector, the extent of meaningful community engagement cannot be established and may remain a catchphrase rather than reality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    药学院的多学科部门利用多步骤的共识建立过程来创建与部门的使命和愿景相一致的社区参与的共享部门定义。在建立共识和参与部门的整个过程中,教职员工有机会参与社区参与的工作和部门活动,包括定期部门会议的更新。这使教师在努力实现概述的晋升目标时,可以对社区参与的概念有参考和共同理解。对社区参与的共同理解是必要的,以确保跨学科部门的所有成员都朝着共同的目标和共同的愿景努力。
    A multidisciplinary department at a College of Pharmacy utilized a multi-step consensus-building process to create a shared departmental definition of community engagement that was consistent with the department\'s mission and vision. Throughout the consensus building and engaged department process, faculty and staff were given opportunities to participate in community-engaged work and departmental activities, including updates in regular scheduled department meetings. This allowed faculty to have a reference and common understanding of the concept of community engagement when striving towards outlined promotion objectives. A shared understanding of what constitutes community engagement was necessary to ensure that all members of the interdisciplinary department are working toward a common goal and shared vision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: In South Sudan, the civil war in 2016 led to mass displacement in Juba that rapidly spread to other regions of the country. Access to health care was limited because of attacks against health facilities and workers and pregnant women and newborns were among the most vulnerable. Translation of newborn guidelines into public health practice, particularly during periods of on-going violence, are not well studied during humanitarian emergencies. During 2016 to 2017, we assessed the delivery of a package of community- and facility-based newborn health interventions in displaced person camps to understand implementation outcomes. This case analysis describes the challenges encountered and mitigating strategies employed during the conduct of an original research study.
    CONCLUSIONS: Challenges unique to conducting research in South Sudan included violent attacks against humanitarian aid workers that required research partners to modify study plans on an ongoing basis to ensure staff and patient safety. South Sudan faced devastating cholera and measles outbreaks that shifted programmatic priorities. Costs associated with traveling study staff and transporting equipment kept rising due to hyperinflation and, after the July 2016 violence, the study team was unable to convene in Juba for some months to conduct refresher trainings or monitor data collection. Strategies used to address these challenges were: collaborating with non-research partners to identify operational solutions; maintaining a locally-based study team; maintaining flexible budgets and timelines; using mobile data collection to conduct timely data entry and remote quality checks; and utilizing a cascade approach for training field staff.
    CONCLUSIONS: The case analysis provides lessons that are applicable to other humanitarian settings including the need for flexible research methods, budgets and timelines; innovative training and supervision; and a local research team with careful consideration of sociopolitical factors that impact their access and safety. Engagement of national and local stakeholders can ensure health services and data collection continue and findings translate to public health action, even in contexts facing severe and unpredictable insecurity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号